Mechanism of the repetitive ventricular response in man

Prognostic value of programmed electrical stimulation in patients with a recent episode of unstable angina

Patients with a recent episode of unstable angina have a 10% 1-year risk of sudden cardiac death. To determine prospectively whether electrophysiologic testing might be useful in predicting sudden death, 20 patients admitted to our hospital underwent programmed electrical stimulation as part of their evaluation. None had persistent angina, severe congestive heart failure, or sustained arrhythmias at the time of testing. Because of their long-term benefits, beta-blocking agents were continued whenever possible (18 of 20 patients). Ten of 20 patients (50%) had inducible ventricular tachycardia. In 19.5 months' mean follow-up, three patients (15%) either died suddenly or survived an episode of ventricular fibrillation. Programmed electrical stimulation was an insensitive (33%) and nonspecific (47%) predictor of sudden death in these patients. Programmed ventricular stimulation soon after admission for unstable angina is not a useful prognostic indicator for sudden death. Such patients do have a frequent induction of ventricular arrhythmias which appears to be a nonspecific marker of underlying coronary disease.

Determinants of prognosis in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as determined by programmed electrical stimulation

The incidence and prognostic significance of electrically induced ventricular arrhythmias were prospectively assessed in 42 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent 24-hour, long-term electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring and 30 were analyzed by a signal-averaging vectorcardiographic procedure at entry into the study. Their response to programmed electrical stimulation during basic right ventricular pacing was investigated using 1 and 2 ventricular extrastimuli. A monomorphic tachycardia was not induced in any patient. In 36 patients (86%) polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias were initiated. Three or more induced consecutive ventricular premature complexes occurred in 9 patients (21%), nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 2 (4.8%) and ventricular fibrillation in 1 patient (2.4%). There was no association between electrically induced polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias and the degree of impairment of left ventricular function. Furthermore, the incidence of induced ventricular arrhythmias was not related to the Lown grade or to the total number of ventricular premature complexes during Holter monitoring. A late potential was detected by the averaged vectorcardiogram in only 1 of the 30 patients. During follow-up (mean 16 +/- 7 months) 7 patients died, 5 from chronic congestive heart failure and 2 from sudden cardiac death. No patient had an electrically induced arrhythmia of 3 or more ventricular premature complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prediction of sudden death and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in survivors of complicated myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation using a maximum of three ventricular extrastimuli

The prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias induced by programmed electrical stimulation was evaluated in 50 survivors of acute myocardial infarction complicated by a major new conduction disturbance (38 patients), congestive heart failure (33 patients) or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (22 patients), alone or in combination. Programmed stimulation was performed in patients in stable condition 7 to 36 days (mean 16) after infarction using one to three extrastimuli at four times diastolic threshold at a maximum of two right ventricular sites. Two groups were identified by the response to programmed stimulation: 17 patients with sustained (greater than 15 seconds) or nonsustained (greater than 7 beats but less than or equal to 15 seconds) ventricular tachycardia (group I), and 33 patients with 0 to 7 intraventricular reentrant complexes in response to maximal stimulation efforts (group II). Group I patients had a higher incidence of anterior infarction than that of patients in group II (71 versus 42%), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 0.35 versus 0.48) and were more often treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (47 versus 18%, p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in the occurrence of congestive failure, new conduction disorders or sustained ventricular arrhythmias with infarction, or in the proportions treated with a beta-receptor blocking agent, coronary bypass grafting or a permanent pacemaker. Total cardiac mortality was 24% during a mean follow-up period of 23 months and did not differ between groups; however, the response to programmed stimulation identified a group at high risk of late sudden death or spontaneous ventricular tachycardia: 7 (41%) of 17 group I patients compared with 0 of 33 group II patients (p less than 0.001). The induction of sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia identified all patients who died suddenly or had spontaneous tachycardia (sensitivity 100%), but triple extrastimuli were required to induce prognostically significant arrhythmias in five of these seven patients; the specificity of this protocol was only 57%. When the clinical variables of the group were evaluated individually, the response to programmed stimulation had a stronger association with occurrence of late sudden death than did any other factor (Fisher's exact test, p less than 0.001); however, a type II error could not be excluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Demonstration of reentry within the right bundle branch in man

Reentry within the right bundle branch which, to our knowledge is a hitherto undescribed mechanism of His-Purkinje reentry in man, was elicited during programmed right ventricular stimulation. Electrophysiologic analysis excluded atrioventricular nodal reentry. His bundle reentry, reentry involving both bundle branches, and intraventricular micro-reentry.

Comparison of programmed electrical stimulation and ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring in the management of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation

Forty-four patients with primary ventricular fibrillation or recurrent ventricular tachycardia were stabilized on an antiarrhythmic drug regimen before electrophysiologic study and 24 to 72 hours of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring were performed. The long-term predictive value of these two tests was then compared retrospectively for a 12 to 32 month (mean 18) follow-up period, during which all patients continued receiving the same antiarrhythmic drug regimen. Electrophysiologic testing induced ventricular tachycardia (greater than or equal to 3 beats) in 26 patients; 23 had a poor clinical outcome (positive predictive value 88%), defined as sudden death or sustained ventricular tachycardia. In 18 patients with a negative electrophysiologic test, only 1 had a poor clinical outcome (negative predictive value 94%). Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring accurately predicted outcome in 7 of 10 patients with a positive recording (positive predictive value 70%), defined as three or more consecutive ventricular extrasystoles, and in 17 of 34 patients with negative ambulatory monitor recordings (negative predictive value 50%). The long-term predictive accuracy of the electrophysiologic study was significantly higher than that of the ambulatory electrocardiographic monitor (p less than 0.001). Electrophysiologic studies offer advantages over ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in this high risk patient group, providing a high degree of accuracy in predicting the long-term clinical response to antiarrhythmic drugs for at least 18 months.

Prevalence and clinical significance of the repetitive ventricular response during sinus rhythm in coronary disease patients

The prevalence of the repetitive ventricular response (RVR) after single and double premature stimulation during sinus rhythm or a paced supraventricular rhythm at a rate of 85 bpm was assessed in 343 patients (group 1: 237 patients studied prospectively who were referred for coronary arteriography and ventriculography; group 2: 44 patients after recent acute myocardial infarction; group 3: 61 patients with documented ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation). In group 1 patients, RVR testing was performed from both the right ventricular apex (n = 237) and outflow tract (n = 190), whereas in the remaining patients only the apex was stimulated. In group 1, RVR after a single premature stimulus occurred in 21.9% and after two stimuli in 63.2%. In patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function (n = 63) the prevalence of RVR after a single stimulus was significantly less (9.5%) than in those with LV dysfunction (n = 174;26.4%,p less than 0.01). However, after double stimulation, there was no longer any difference. In group 2, the prevalence of RVR was 25% after one and 34.1% after two premature stimuli. In group 3 patients, RVR was observed in only 14.8% after one and in 41% of patients after two premature stimuli. Ventricular tachycardia (greater than or equal to 10 QRS) was induced in nine patients during a supraventricular rhythm. Two hundred thirty-seven patients of group 1, who were prospectively studied in order to assess the prognostic significance of the RVR, were followed for a mean period of 27.2 +/- 10.7 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in coronary artery disease

The induction of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with a history of malignant ventricular arrhythmia by programmed electrical stimulation (PES) is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the incidence and significance of inducible arrhythmia in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who do not have a history of serious arrhythmia are unknown. We studied 32 such patients (31 men, mean age 55 years) with PES at the time of cardiac catheterization. Fourteen patients (Group I) manifested greater than or equal to 3 extraventricular responses when challenged with 1 to 3 propagated right ventricular extrastimuli during ventricular pacing. Twelve (86%) of these 14 had evidence of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), defined by a global ejection fraction of less than 50% or regional wall motion abnormalities. The remaining 18 patients (Group II) manifested less than or equal to 2 responses to extrastimulation. Only 4 (22%) of these 18 had LVD. Proximal 3-vessel CAD was more frequent in Group I patients (10 of 14, 71%) than in Group II (7 of 18, 39%). Only 5 patients (4 from Group I and 1 from Group II) demonstrated complex arrhythmia during exercise testing or ambulatory monitoring. The induction of extraventricular responses during PES may serve as an independent marker of electrical instability in the coronary population and is a much more common finding in those with LVD.

Response to programmed ventricular stimulation: sensitivity, specificity and relation to heart disease

This prospective study of 100 patients evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the repetitive ventricular response and ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation for identifying patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The influence of underlying heart disease on such sensitivity and specificity was also evaluated. The repetitive ventricular response was sensitive (92 percent) for detecting patients with prior spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but lacked specificity (57 percent); the rate of false positive responses was 43 percent. Inducible ventricular tachycardia was less sensitive (65 percent) but more specific (98 percent); the rate of false positive responses was only 3 percent. Among the 100 patients, 71 had heart disease, 29 did not. The presence of underlying heart disease had no significant effect on the sensitivity and specificity of repetitive ventricular responses or ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed stimulation; it did not increase the rate of false positive responses. It is concluded that (1) ventricular tachycardia induced with programmed ventricular stimulation is an excellent basis for guiding the management of clinically significant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, regardless of underlying heart disease; and (2) the repetitive ventricular response is not useful for this purpose because of its high rate of false positive responses among patients with or without significant heart disease.

Prediction of sudden death by electrophysiologic studies in high risk patients surviving acute myocardial infarction

Seventy patients surviving a myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure or arrhythmias, or both, were studied 7 to 20 days after the infarction. Twenty-four hour electrocardiographic ambulatory monitoring and intracardiac electrophysiologic studies were performed in each patient. Electrophysiologic studies included introduction of single right ventricular premature stimuli during sinus rhythm (70 patients), atrial pacing (35 patients) and ventricular pacing (70 patients) at a stimulating voltage of 2 V, with the use of higher stimulating voltages (up to 10 V), and double right ventricular premature stimuli in 33 patients and pacing at a second right ventricular site in 50 patients. A repetitive response was defined as two or more spontaneous ventricular depolarizations in response to the premature stimuli, with His bundle reentry and aberrant conduction of supraventricular impulses excluded by a His bundle recording. Repetitive responses were initiated in 20 patients, and 12 patients had responses that were either sustained ventricular tachycardia or self-terminating ventricular tachycardia of more than five complexes in duration. The finding of a repetitive response was not related to the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias during ambulatory monitoring or in the coronary care unit. Five of the 12 patients with sustained or self-terminating responses of more than five complexes died during the 12 month follow-up period, 4 suddenly, and these responses were significantly associated with late sudden death (p less than 0.05), because only 1 of 25 patients with responses of fewer than five complexes or no response to maximal provocation died suddenly. It is concluded that induced responses of more than five complexes in duration may be an important indicator of a potentially reversible risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction.

Repetitive responses to single ventricular extrastimuli in patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias: incidence and clinical significance

Electrophysiologic studies were carried out in 85 patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias: 44 with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia (group A), 16 with recurrent nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (group B), and 25 with recent prehospital ventricular fibrillation not associated with acute myocardial infarction (group C). Programmed ventricular stimulation from the right ventricular apex included premature stimulation during normal sinus rhythm, atrial pacing, and ventricular pacing, as well as brief bursts of rapid ventricular pacing (RVP). A repetitive ventricular response (RVR) was defined as one or more non-stimulated premature ventricular depolarizations in response to a single paced premature ventricular depolarization during normal sinus rhythm or atrial pacing. RVRs were observed in seven of 44 (16%) group A patients, one of 16 (6%) group B patients, and three of 25 (12%) group C patients. In contrast, single and double premature ventricular stimuli during ventricular pacing and/or bursts of RVP resulted in the reproducible initiation of ventricular tachycardia in 40 of 44 (91%) group A patients, 10 of 16 (63%) group B patients, and 19 of 25 (76%) group C patients. We conclude that RVRs to single ventricular extrastimuli during normal sinus rhythm or atrial pacing are rare, and therefore are an insensitive index of susceptibility to serious ventricular arrhythmias in these patients.