Renal response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition

Lowering blood pressure reduces renal events in type 2 diabetes

BP is an important determinant of kidney disease among patients with diabetes. The recommended thresholds to initiate treatment to lower BP are 130/80 and 125/75 mmHg for people with diabetes and nephropathy, respectively. We sought to determine the effects of lowering BP below these currently recommended thresholds on renal outcomes among 11,140 patients who had type 2 diabetes and participated in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study. Patients were randomly assigned to fixed combination perindopril-indapamide or placebo, regardless of their BP at entry. During a mean follow-up of 4.3 yr, active treatment reduced the risk for renal events by 21% (P < 0.0001), which was driven by reduced risks for developing microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria (both P < 0.003). Effects of active treatment were consistent across subgroups defined by baseline systolic or diastolic BP. Lower systolic BP levels during follow-up, even to <110 mmHg, was associated with progressively lower rates of renal events. In conclusion, BP-lowering treatment with perindopril-indapamide administered routinely to individuals with type 2 diabetes provides important renoprotection, even among those with initial BP <120/70 mmHg. We could not identify a BP threshold below which renal benefit is lost.

Does blood pressure reduction necessarily compromise cardiac function or renal hemodynamics? Effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril

Clinical studies indicate that the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril is an effective antihypertensive agent when administered once daily. At the end of a 4-week, double-blind crossover trial comparing quinapril and placebo, patients were admitted for a hemodynamic profile study 12 hours after taking the previous dose. A final 20 mg dose of quinapril had no additional effect on blood pressure. This is interesting inasmuch as the plasma half-life of the active metabolite quinaprilat is approximately 2 hours and the effective accumulation half-life is approximately 3 hours. The blood pressure reduction in patients with mild hypertension receiving long-term quinapril therapy may be more closely related to prolonged angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or to an effect on tissue angiotensin II concentration than to the plasma half-life. This may be the case particularly for cardiac output and renal circulation, because quinapril lowers total vascular resistance without increasing cardiac output or disturbing autoregulation of renal blood flow. Reduced ventricular wall stress, improved diastolic function, and lower renal perfusion pressure may spare cardiac function and glomeruli from hypertensive vascular damage.

Control of blood pressure by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

Modification of the renin-angiotensin system, part of a powerful feedback system for long-term control of arterial pressure and volume homeostasis, through use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, offers a powerful means of reducing blood pressure in many hypertensive patients. There is considerable evidence to suggest that the chronic renal and blood pressure actions of ACE inhibitors are mediated mainly by blockade of angiotensin II formation, rather than by other effects such as increased levels of kinins or prostaglandins. The long-term actions of angiotensin II and aldosterone on blood pressure are closely intertwined with their effects on volume homeostasis and the renal pressure natriuresis mechanism. In most instances, changes in angiotensin II and aldosterone act to amplify the effectiveness of pressure natriuresis and minimize changes in blood pressure needed to maintain sodium balance. When angiotensin II or aldosterone levels are inappropriately elevated, the antinatriuretic effects of these hormones shift pressure natriuresis to higher levels, thereby necessitating increased blood pressure to maintain sodium balance. Control of renal excretory function and modulation of pressure natriuresis by angiotensin II is mediated by intrarenal and extrarenal effects, including stimulation of aldosterone secretion. Current evidence indicates that the intrarenal effects of angiotensin II are quantitatively more important than changes in aldosterone in regulating renal excretion and arterial pressure. The intrarenal actions of angiotensin II include a direct effect on tubular sodium transport as well as a potent constrictor action on efferent arterioles, which increases reabsorption by altering peritubular capillary forces. The constrictor effect of angiotensin II on efferent arterioles also helps to stabilize glomerular filtration rate and therefore excretion of metabolic waste products, an action that may be particularly important when renal perfusion is impaired (e.g., in renal artery stenosis or heart failure).

Immediate and short-term cardiovascular effects of fosinopril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with essential hypertension

Immediate and short-term cardiovascular effects of a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, fosinopril, were assessed in 10 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Administration of a 10 mg oral dose of fosinopril reduced mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.001) as a result of a 24% fall in total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.001). Short-term therapy (12 weeks) maintained the decrease in mean arterial pressure (p less than 0.05) by decreasing total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.01), without reflexive cardiac stimulation or expanding intravascular volume. Renal vascular resistance decreased (p less than 0.05) while renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction remained unchanged. The response pattern to mental, isometric and orthostatic stress was similarly unchanged. Left ventricular mass diminished by 11% (p less than 0.01); myocardial contractility was unaffected. Afterload was reduced (p less than 0.05), and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening and stroke volume increased (p less than 0.05). Thus, arterial pressure reduction produced by fosinopril was associated with improved systemic and renal hemodynamics and reduced left ventricular mass.

The evolution of antihypertensive therapy: an overview of four decades of experience

Hypertension is a major public health problem amendable to treatment. Numerous large scale clinical trials have demonstrated that effective, sustained control of elevated arterial pressure to a level below 140/90 mm Hg results in reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Over the past 4 decades antihypertensive drug therapy has evolved from a stepwise, but physiologically rational, selection of agents to specific programs tailored to individualized therapy for specific clinical situations. This evolution has taken place because of a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertensive diseases, the development of new classes of antihypertensive agents that attack specific pressor mechanisms, and the ability to wed these concepts into a rational and specific therapeutic program. Thus, with the currently available spectrum of antihypertensive therapy, we are now able to select treatment for special patient populations utilizing a single agent and, therefore, we can protect the heart, brain and kidneys and maintain organ function without exacerbating associated diseases. These benefits are clear-cut and have resulted in many millions of patients becoming the beneficiaries of this transfer of careful, painstaking and purposeful investigative experiences into clinical practice.

Immediate and short-term cardiovascular effects of a new converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) in essential hypertension

The immediate and short-term effects of lisinopril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor, on systemic and regional hemodynamics, cardiac structure and function and humoral indexes were evaluated in 10 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. A single oral dose of 5 mg lisinopril reduced mean arterial pressure from 118 to 104 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) and significantly increased (p less than 0.05) all load-dependent indexes of ventricular function (i.e., ejection fraction, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening and fractional fiber shortening rate). After 10 to 12 weeks of once-daily administration of lisinopril, mean arterial pressure remained reduced over a full 24-hour period (p less than 0.01), and was mediated through arteriolar dilation as expressed by the close correlation (r = 0.93, p less than 0.01) between changes in mean arterial pressure and changes in total peripheral resistance. Cardiac index decreased from 3.06 to 2.68 liters/min/m2 (p less than 0.01) without correlation to the decrease in arterial pressure (r = 0.06). Despite this reduction in cardiac index, renal blood flow increased from 861 to 1,053 ml/min (p less than 0.05) and renal vascular resistance decreased from 14 to 9 units (p less than 0.01). Left ventricular mass index decreased from 124 to 109 g/m2 (p less than 0.05), and left ventricular function remained unchanged. Thus, the decrease in arterial pressure produced by lisinopril was associated with improved renal hemodynamics and reduced left ventricular mass.

Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. II: Investigation of the potential role of enalapril in deaths with renal failure

The possibility that enalapril might damage renal function was investigated in 1098 deaths recorded in a prescription-event monitoring study. Case notes for 913 patients were examined. In seventy five there was a rise in the urea or creatinine concentration of 50% or more above pretreatment values. Enalapril appeared to have contributed to a decline in renal function and subsequent death in 10 of these patients. Several characteristics were identified among these patients, including old age, the use of high dose or potassium sparing diuretics, and pre-existing renal disease. Adding a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug was also associated with a deterioration in patients with previously stable renal function. No death was encountered of a patient with uncomplicated hypertension. Enalapril infrequently contributed to a substantial decline in renal function in certain vulnerable patients, especially those receiving other drugs known to be capable of adversely affecting renal function. Awareness of the characteristics of these patients and of their concomitant treatment may serve to reduce the risk.

Dependence of enhanced maximal exercise performance on increased peak skeletal muscle perfusion during long-term captopril therapy in heart failure

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), skeletal muscle blood flow by xenon-133 washout technique and femoral vein arteriovenous oxygen difference and lactate were measured at rest and during maximal bicycle exercise in eight patients with severe congestive heart failure before and after 8 weeks of therapy with captopril. During therapy, skeletal muscle blood flow at rest increased significantly from 1.5 +/- 0.6 to 2.6 +/- 1.0 ml/100 g per min (p less than 0.05), with a concomitant decrease in the femoral arteriovenous oxygen difference from 10.0 +/- 1.7 to 8.3 +/- 1.9 ml/100 ml (p less than 0.05). Maximal VO2 increased significantly from 13.4 +/- 3.0 to 15.5 +/- 4.1 ml/kg per min (p less than 0.05). In four patients, the increase in maximal VO2 averaged 3.7 ml/kg per min (range 2.7 to 4.9), whereas in the remaining four patients, it was less than 1 ml/kg per min. Overall, peak skeletal muscle blood flow attained during exercise did not change significantly during long-term therapy with captopril (19.6 +/- 6.2 versus 27.6 +/- 14.3 ml/100 g per min, p = NS). However, the four patients with a significant increase in maximal VO2 experienced substantial increases in peak skeletal muscle blood flow and the latter changes were linearly correlated with changes in maximal VO2 (r = 0.95, p less than 0.001). Femoral arteriovenous oxygen difference at peak exercise was unchanged (12.6 +/- 2.6 versus 12.6 +/- 2.4 ml/100 ml). Thus, improvement in maximal VO2 produced by long-term therapy with captopril is associated with an increased peripheral vasodilatory response to exercise, and this improvement only occurs when the peak blood flow is augmented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Humoral effects of long-term oral enalapril therapy

Twenty-seven subjects with essential hypertension were prospectively followed for a minimum of 100 weeks, receiving either enalapril monotherapy or enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy. Blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system were assessed following 4 weeks of placebo therapy, and 56 and 96 weeks of maintenance drug therapy. Blood pressure was well controlled with either form of therapy. Plasma renin activity remained stimulated following both long-term monotherapy and combination therapy. However, immunoreactive plasma angiotensin II concentration was not suppressed following either long-term monotherapy or combination therapy. Similarly, plasma aldosterone concentration was not suppressed following either form of therapy; indeed, combination therapy was associated with stimulation of plasma aldosterone concentration. We conclude that enalapril monotherapy or enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide therapy was effective in controlling blood pressure, but that long-term blood pressure control must be related to an angiotensin II independent antihypertensive mechanism.

Adverse reactions with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Teprotide, a nonapeptide isolated from the venom of a Brazilian pit viper, Bothrops jararaca, was the first angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to be discovered and tested. It was found to be an effective, non-toxic antihypertensive agent as well as an afterload-reducing agent for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The primary activity of teprotide resulted from blockade of the angiotensin I converting enzyme--the pivotal step in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and consequent reductions in angiotensin II levels. There was limited clinical testing for teprotide because of: its scarcity; the need for parenteral administration; and the subsequent discovery and synthesis of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Captopril is the prototype oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and has been extensively studied since the initiation of formal studies in 1976. Perhaps one of the most closely researched drugs in modern times, the experience with captopril now includes more than 12,000 patients studied in formalized trials and over 4,000,000 patients treated world-wide by physicians for hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril (MK421) is the first of what appears to be a growing number of analogues which are structurally and pharmacodynamically different from captopril; yet, they possess the same capacity for inhibiting the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme. The side effect profile of enalapril (and presumably future) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors appears to be similar to captopril, though clearly more experience is needed with newer agents. The initial use of captopril was troubled by a relatively high incidence of side effects which will form the focus of this discussion. Partially the result of incomplete pharmacokinetic information, captopril was administered in early studies at dosages now recognised to be far in excess of those necessary for drug action. In addition, dosages were given without regard for deficiencies of renal function, now known to be the main excretory route of captopril. The population of those patients studied frequently had chronic, treatment-resistant hypertension, often associated with concomitant end-organ disease (especially renal disease); and many additional factors further complicating the clinical setting, e.g. a relatively high incidence of collagen vascular disease and immunosuppressive treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hemodynamic effects of enalapril on neonatal chronic partial ureteral obstruction

To evaluate the role of angiotensin II (ANG II) in renal vasoconstriction due to ipsilateral CPUO, guinea pigs were subjected to incomplete left ureteral stenosis within the first 48 hr of life, and were given enalapril from the 14th day of life until study at 23 +/- 3 days or 8 weeks of age. Renal blood flow (RBF) was measured using radioactive microspheres, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was derived from inulin extraction. The number of perfused glomeruli per kidney was determined following in vivo India ink perfusion. Enalapril treatment resulted in an 83% rise in RBF of the obstructed kidney, from 2.58 +/- 0.26 to 4.73 +/- 0.48 ml/min (P less than 0.001), which was associated with a 26% increase in number of perfused glomeruli (P less than 0.01). Mean GFR of the hydronephrotic kidney increased from 0.13 +/- 0.02 to 0.37 +/- 0.10 ml/min (P less than 0.05). Enalapril had no effect on intraureteral pressure of the obstructed left kidney after 7 to 13 days of administration, and did not affect renal mass or ureteral diameter after 6 weeks of treatment. It is concluded that hemodynamic consequences of CPUO in the neonate may be attenuated by ANG converting enzyme inhibition. The primary effect of enalapril is most likely inhibition of intrarenal ANG II formation.

Systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of captopril and milrinone administered alone and concomitantly in patients with heart failure

The effects of milrinone and captopril on ventricular performance, renal blood flow, and femoral vein oxygen content were compared in 11 patients with severe chronic heart failure. The increase in stroke volume index was greater with milrinone than with captopril (28 +/- 7 vs 24 +/- 7 ml/m2; p less than .05), while pulmonary capillary wedge pressures fell similarly (19 +/- 10 vs 21 +/- 7 mm Hg). Mean systemic arterial pressure decreased significantly from 84 +/- 10 to 73 +/- 11 mm Hg (p less than .05) with captopril but did not with milrinone. Neither drug changed heart rate significantly. Although milrinone produced a greater improvement in ventricular performance than captopril, renal blood flow increased similarly with both drugs from 289 +/- 78 to 417 +/- 111 ml/min (p less than .05) and from 278 +/- 77 to 441 +/- 115 ml/min (p less than .05), respectively. Femoral vein oxygen content was increased by milrinone from 7.9 +/- 2.6 to 9.8 +/- 3.0 ml/100 ml (p less than .05) and was not changed by captopril. In seven additional patients, intravenous milrinone, administered at the peak effect of captopril, further augmented stroke volume index from 24 +/- 6 to 32 +/- 6 ml/m2 (p less than .05) and tended to reduce pulmonary capillary wedge pressure further from 20 +/- 8 to 18 +/- 9 mm Hg (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Monotherapy of hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are clearly effective treatment for all stages of hypertension. Since the introduction of captopril in 1981, numerous ACE inhibitors have been synthesized and are under investigation. Their exact antihypertensive mechanism of action remains unclear. Part of their effect may be mediated by vasodilator prostaglandins. Early studies with as much as 1,000 mg a day captopril demonstrated the agent's ability to reduce blood pressure, but only 10 percent of the severely hypertensive patients were controlled with monotherapy. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that patients with mild to moderate hypertension can be controlled with ACE inhibitor alone, although there is a tendency for the very low doses to lose their effect with time. Black patients are less readily controlled with monotherapy. Captopril has now been demonstrated to be effective in the hypertension of scleroderma and has reversed scleroderma renal crisis. ACE inhibitors are also effective for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure.

Enalapril in treatment of hypertension with renal artery stenosis. Changes in blood pressure, renin, angiotensin I and II, renal function, and body composition

The converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, in single daily doses of 10 to 40 mg, was given to 20 hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis. The decrease in blood pressure six hours after the first dose of enalapril was significantly related to the pretreatment plasma concentrations of active renin and angiotensin II, and to the concurrent decrease in angiotensin II. Blood pressure decreased further with continued treatment; the long-term decrease was not significantly related to pretreatment plasma renin or angiotensin II levels. At three months, 24 hours after the last dose of enalapril, blood pressure, plasma angiotensin II, and converting enzyme activity remained low, and active renin and angiotensin I high; six hours after dosing, angiotensin II had, however, decreased further. The increase in active renin during long-term treatment was proportionately greater than the increase in angiotensin I; this probably reflects the diminution in renin substrate that occurs with converting enzyme inhibition. Long-term enalapril treatment increased renin secretion by more than 10-fold, and renal venous and peripheral plasma renin concentration by more than 20-fold; however, the mean renal venous renin ratio was not changed. Enalapril caused a reduction in effective renal plasma flow via the affected kidney but a marked and consistent increase on the contralateral side, where renal vascular resistance decreased. The overall increase in effective renal plasma flow was significantly related to the decrease in angiotensin II. Overall glomerular filtration rate was lowered, and serum creatinine and urea increased. Enalapril alone caused a long-term reduction in exchangeable sodium, with slight but distinct increases in serum potassium. In five patients with bilateral renal artery lesions, enalapril given alone for three months did not cause renal function to deteriorate. Enalapril was well tolerated and provided effective long-term control of hypertension; only two of the 20 patients studied required concomitant diuretic treatment.

Enalapril in the treatment of hypertension with renal artery stenosis

The converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, in single daily doses of 10-40 mg, was given to 20 hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis. The blood pressure fall six hours after the first dose of enalapril was significantly related to the pretreatment plasma concentrations of active renin and angiotensin II and to the concurrent fall in angiotensin II. Blood pressure fell further with continued treatment; the long term fall was not significantly related to pretreatment plasma renin or angiotensin II concentrations. At three months, 24 hours after the last dose of enalapril, blood pressure, plasma angiotensin II, and converting enzyme activity remained low and active renin and angiotensin I high; six hours after dosing, angiotensin II had, however, fallen further. The rise in active renin during long term treatment was proportionally greater than the rise in angiotensin I; this probably reflects the fall in renin substrate that occurs with converting enzyme inhibition. Enalapril alone caused reduction in exchangeable sodium, with distinct increases in serum potassium, creatinine, and urea. Enalapril was well tolerated and controlled hypertension effectively long term; only two of the 20 patients required concomitant diuretic treatment.

Antihypertensives and their impact on renal function

Antihypertensive agents possess many properties that could cause alterations in renal function. These are: alterations in systemic hemodynamics, changes in the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system, direct intrarenal effects, and alterations in salt and water metabolism. This article reviews the antihypertensive agents in general usage and major points are made concerning potential deleterious effects of methyldopa and nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking drugs on renal function. In particular, recent data are shown concerning the effects of labetalol on renal function indicating the absence of decrements in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in patients with normal renal function and in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. A possible decrease in these parameters in patients with severe renal insufficiency is presented and discussed.