Entrainment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardias during overdrive pacing from high right atrium and coronary sinus. With special reference to atrioventricular dissociation and 2:1 retrograde block during tachycardias

Unique electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with different ventriculoatrial block patterns: effects of slow pathway ablation and insights into the location of the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND

The electrophysiologic mechanisms of different ventriculoatrial (VA) block patterns during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize AVNRTs with different VA block patterns and to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation.

METHODS

Electrophysiologic data from six AVNRT patients with different VA block patterns were reviewed.

RESULTS

All AVNRTs were induced after a sudden AH "jump-up" with the earliest retrograde atrial activation at the right superoparaseptum. Different VA block patterns comprised Wenckebach His-atrial (HA) block (n = 4), 2:1 HA block (n = 1), and variable HA conduction times during fixed AVNRT cycle length (CL) (n = 1). Wenckebach HA block during AVNRT was preceded by gradual HA interval prolongation with fixed His-His (HH) interval and unchanged atrial activation sequence. AVNRT with 2:1 HA block was induced after slow pathway ablation for slow-slow AVNRT with 1:1 HA conduction, and earliest atrial activation shifted from right inferoparaseptum to superoparaseptum without change in AVNRT CL. The presence of a lower common pathway was suggested by a longer HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL than during AVNRT (n = 5) or Wenckebach HA block during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL (n = 1). In four patients, HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL was unusually long (188 +/- 30 ms). Ablations at the right inferoparaseptum rendered AVNRT noninducible in 5 (83%) of 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

Most AVNRTs with different VA block patterns were amenable to classic slow pathway ablation. The reentrant circuit could be contained within a functionally protected region around the AV node and posterior nodal extensions, and different VA block patterns resulted from variable conduction at tissues extrinsic to the reentrant circuit.

Ventriculatrial Block During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Suggesting Existence of an Upper Common Pathway

Studies on the mechanisms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have yet to clarify whether the slow and fast pathways connect directly with the atria or via an upper common pathway. Although a "final common pathway" connecting the slow and fast pathways to the proximal His bundle was thought to be part of the reentrant circuit, debate on the presence of an upper common pathway continues. We report a case of AVNRT continuing despite the occurrence of ventriculoatrial block, thus supporting the existence of an upper common pathway.

V-A block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: reentry confined to the AV node

Retrograde block during atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia is considered a rare phenomenon that can potentially occur in the AV node or in the atrium. A patient with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and transient VA block localized in the AV node is presented. Pharmacological and stimulation maneuvers identified the site of block in the AV node and not in the atrium. Thus, AV nodal reentry can be confined to the AV node.

Irregular atrial activation during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: evidence of an upper common pathway

Controversy continues regarding the precise nature of the reentrant circuit of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, especially the existence of an upper common pathway. In this case report, we show that marked variation and irregularity in atrial activation (maximum AA interval variation of 80 msec) can exist with fixed and constant activation of the His bundle and ventricles during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in a 45-year-old female patient. We propose that irregular atrial activation is due to variable and inconsistent conduction from the AV node to the atria through the perinodal transitional cell envelope extrinsic to the reentrant circuit. Our observations support the concept of an upper common pathway, at least in some patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Case report: anterograde 2:1 and retrograde 3:2 Wenckebach block during atrioventricular nodal tachycardia: controversies of the upper and lower common pathways

The exact nature of the reentry circuit for the atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and particularly the concept and role of the upper and lower common pathways is not well defined. Although it is well accepted that the His-Purkinje system and the ventricles are not an essential part of the tachycardia circuit, controversy still exists as to whether the atria are essential components of the circuit. We describe a patient in whom the AVNRT perpetuated despite the spontaneous development of 2:1 anterograde and 3:2 retrograde block. To our knowledge, such a combination of electrophysiological phenomenon has not been previously reported. The electrophysiological basis of these observations and their clinical implications are discussed.

Atrioventricular nodal tachycardia occurring during atrial fibrillation

We describe the case of a 32-year-old woman with palpitations and atrial fibrillation (AF) as the only documented arrhythmia. The patient underwent electrophysiologic study and was found to have inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). During a prolonged episode of AVNRT, AF developed in both atria, but AVNRT persisted. Dissociation of the atria during AVNRT is evidence that the atrium is not necessary in AVNRT. This case also illustrates the utility of an electrophysiologic study in locating a potentially curable arrhythmia as the primary cause of AF in young patients.

Location of the lower turnaround point in typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: a quantitative model

INTRODUCTION

Recent observations suggest that the circuit of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) may extend down to the His bundle. The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model indicating the location of the lower turnaround point in AVNRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Slow pathway modification was performed in 70 patients with typical AVNRT. During sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing was performed with the AVNRT cycle length. During AVNRT, the HinitAinit interval was measured from initial His to the initial atrial deflection recorded in the His-bundle lead. During ventricular pacing, the HendAinit interval was measured from end of the His to the beginning of the atrial deflection. It was hypothesized that x reflects conduction time from the lower turnaround point to Ainit, whereas y reflects conduction time from the lower turnaround point to Hinit. Anterograde conduction during AVNRT and retrograde conduction during ventricular pacing were assumed to be identical if there was 1:1 retrograde conduction at the AVNRT cycle length. The following formulas describe the relation of the measured parameters: x - y = HinitAinit; and x + y = HendAinit. Resolving both formulas yields the unknown x and y: y = (HendAinit - HinitAinit)/2, x = (HendAinit + HinitAinit)/2. These criteria were present in 52 of 70 patients. The mean cycle length of AVNRT was 355 +/- 42 msec, mean HinitAinit was 54 +/- 27 msec, and mean HendAinit was 60 +/- 29 msec. Accordingly, in 20 of 52 patients, the lower turnaround point was located within the His bundle (y = -15.4 +/- 16.1 msec), in 3 of 52 it was in the nodal-His junctional area (y = 0), and in 29 of 52 it was above the His bundle (y = +12.7 +/- 10.3 msec). The HinitAinit interval was significantly longer (66 +/- 32 msec vs 47 +/- 20 msec; P = 0.02) and the HendAinit interval was significantly shorter (45 +/- 30 msec vs 69 +/- 24 msec; P = 0.004) when the first group was compared with the others.

CONCLUSION

In about 1 of 3 of patients with typical AVNRT, the lower turnaround point of the circuit is within the His bundle; in more than half of the patients it is above the His bundle. These data do not support the concept that all AVNRTs have an intranodal circuit, but are in accordance with the finding of longitudinal dissociation of the His bundle.

Ventriculoatrial block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing multiple retrograde pathways

A rare case of narrow QRS tachycardia continuing despite the occurrence of VA block is reported. Right ventricular stimulation suggested dual AV nodal physiology. The tachycardia was induced by ventricular premature stimulation, which failed to depolarize the atrium. Two types of tachycardia that had different retrograde conduction sequences, HA intervals, and cycle lengths were induced. The occurrence of VA block did not terminate the tachycardia but transiently prolonged the tachycardia cycle length. These findings suggest the mechanism is AV nodal reentry utilizing multiple retrograde pathways with intranodal reentry bridging the VA block and maintaining the tachycardia.

Acceleration of typical atrial flutter due to double-wave reentry induced by programmed electrical stimulation

BACKGROUND

Acceleration of reentrant tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation is a well-documented phenomenon, but the mechanisms remain poorly understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve patients with typical atrial flutter were studied. Activation sequence of the underlying reentrant circuit was recorded by multiple multipolar electrodes placed in the right atrium. In five patients, 27 episodes of atrial flutter acceleration were induced by single extrastimuli delivered in the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and eustachian ridge (TA-ER isthmus) and one by rapid overdrive atrial pacing. Analyses of the activation sequences, intracardiac electrograms, and 12-lead surface ECG P-wave morphology indicated that the acceleration was caused by two successive activation wave fronts circulating in the same direction along the same reentrant circuit (double-wave reentry, DWR). DWR was induced only within a narrow range of coupling interval, from 2 to 45 ms beyond the effective refractory period, and was associated with unidirectional antidromic block of the paced impulse. Patients with DWR had a shorter effective refractory period (138.8+/-13.4 versus 163.8+/-12.2 ms, P<.015) and larger excitable gap (124.0+/-22.6 versus 83.2+/-13.2 ms, P<.009) compared with patients without inducible DWR. All of the DWR episodes were transient. Most (78.6%) terminated after one of the double wave fronts was blocked in the TA-ER isthmus.

CONCLUSIONS

DWR is one of the mechanisms responsible for programmed electrical stimulation-induced atrial flutter acceleration in human subjects. Its induction requires a sufficient excitable gap and antidromic unidirectional block of the paced impulse in the TA-ER isthmus. In addition, the TA-ER isthmus is the usual site of DWR termination.

Analysis of the degree of QRS fusion necessary for its visual detection: importance for the recognition of transient entrainment

BACKGROUND

Fixed fusion is the hallmark for the demonstration of transient entrainment. However, the degree of accuracy of its recognition on the surface ECG is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability to detect fusion in the QRS complex.

METHODS AND RESULTS

While pacing the ventricles at a fixed rate, a model of ventricular fusion was created by introducing late extra stimuli at a second site. In this model, the presence and degree of fusion are known. Pacing sites were the RV apex, outflow tract, and left ventricle in various configurations. We analyzed 433 QRS complexes with different degrees of fusion (or no fusion) in 21 patients. Each QRS was "read" by three investigators blinded to intracardiac recordings but having a reference QRS with no fusion. There was a statistically significant correlation between the degree of fusion and its recognition. Fusion was detected with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 87%. Fusion was accurately detected in all configurations only when >22% of the QRS was fused. In patients with organic left ventricular disease, fusion was better recognized when the driving pacing site was the left ventricle than when it was a right ventricular site. The interobserver agreement was moderate between two pairs of observers and only fair between the remaining pair.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that an accurate detection of ventricular fusion can only be accomplished when fusion occurs during a significant proportion of the QRS duration. The potential lack of recognition of minor degrees of fusion may produce underdetection of transient entrainment.

Neurohumoral and hemodynamic mechanisms of diuresis during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Thirty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, with previously defined mechanisms of the tachycardias, were interviewed by noninvestigators about whether they experienced symptoms of diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias, to test the hypothesis that patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would have a feeling of diuresis, polyuria, or both during or at the termination of the tachycardia. Twelve of the 13 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (92%), two of the 15 patients with AV reentrant tachycardia (13%), and one of the 4 patients with atrial flutter associated with 2:1 AV conduction (25%) felt diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia vs other forms of tachycardia; P < 0.001). In 14 of the 32 patients, the right atrial pressure and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured during both the tachycardias and sinus rhythm. The mean right atrial pressure during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was significantly elevated compared to that during other forms of tachycardia (P < 0.01). The plasma ANP concentration during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was also elevated significantly compared to that during other forms of tachycardias (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the cycle lengths of the tachycardias, age, left atrial dimensions, or the left ventricular ejection fraction between the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and the other forms of tachycardia. We concluded that the feeling of diuresis during or at the termination of tachycardia was a more common symptom in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The higher secretion of plasma ANP from the right atrium might be involved in the mechanism of this symptom.

Overdrive atrial stimulation during transesophageal electrophysiological study: usefulness of post-pacing VA interval analysis in differentiating supraventricular tachycardias with 1:1 atrio-ventricular relationship

We evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of overdrive atrial pacing to identify the relationship between atrial and ventricular activation in supraventricular tachycardias with a stable 1:1 atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction ratio during a transesophageal electrophysiological investigation. Overdrive atrial stimulation was performed in 42 consecutive patients (11 males and 31 females; mean age 49 +/- 17 years) during AV junctional reentrant tachycardia, orthodromic AV reentrant tachycardia and ectopic atrial tachycardia (22, 13 and seven subjects, respectively). Trains of 12 stimuli at a constant rate were introduced starting at a cycle length 10 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length; stimulation was repeated with a 10-ms decrement in pacing cycle length at each step until tachycardia terminated and/or second-degree AV block occurred. The difference between the VA interval duration at baseline and in the first post-pacing tachycardia beat was measured at each step and provided identification of the AV relationship. At least one post-pacing VA interval was evaluable in 90% of the cases and measured 2 +/- 4 and 1 +/- 3 ms in AV junctional and AV reentrant tachycardia groups, respectively, and 83 +/- 42 ms in the ectopic atrial tachycardia group (P < 0.0000001 ectopic atrial tachycardia group vs. others). When three or more post-pacing VA intervals were obtained during the same tachycardia, a curve was constructed by plotting their values against the corresponding pacing cycle lengths. A curve could be constructed in 36% of the cases and was flat in all patients with AV junctional and AV reentry, while it was completely irregular in the ectopic atrial tachycardia group (P < 0.003). The analysis of post-pacing VA interval behaviour in response to overdrive atrial stimulation provides a rapid and reliable differentiation between supraventricular tachycardias with 1:1 AV conduction ratio during a transesophageal electrophysiological study.

Atrial flutter: entrainment characteristics

Entrainment was first described based on observations during rapid (overdrive) pacing of type I atrial flutter. Entrainment is capture of the reentrant circuit of a tachycardia without interrupting the tachycardia, so that with cessation of pacing, the spontaneous reentrant tachycardia is still present. During entrainment, the orthodromic wavefront from the pacing impulse resets the tachycardia to the pacing rate, while the antidromic wavefront either collides with the orthodromic wavefront of the previous beat (usual case) or is blocked by some other mechanism (refractoriness or another cause of block). Entrainment may be either manifest or concealed. The principles of entrainment during type I atrial flutter have permitted identification of targets for successful ablation, of mapping sites within or outside the reentrant circuit, and of appropriate pacing rates to successfully interrupt atrial flutter and restore sinus rhythm.

Transient entrainment: the evolution of a medical concept from description to prescription

Entrainment is a phenomenon that has come to have considerable utility in cardiac electro-physiology diagnosis and treatment; specifically, to identify a zone of slow conduction in a reentrant circuit, a zone hypothetically vulnerable to intervention from the application of RF energy. The observation of entrainment has gone through an evolutionary sequence in the literature, from the initial simple observations of the phenomenon to the present stage of relatively fixed criteria of identification. This article follows the evolution of the specific features of the criteria of entrainment to their current crystallization into features that are suggested to prescribe sites for attempted ablation. This examination of the evolutionary course of the development of the conception of entrainment is of interest not only to cardiac electrophysiology, but also to philosophers of science, by illustrating how scientists emphasize and develop certain observations with the ultimate aim of applying the observations for successful intervention in pathological entities.

Double atrial responses to a single ventricular impulse in long RP' tachycardia

Double atrial responses (DARs) to a single ventricular impulse have been described in patients with long RP' tachycardia. To define the determinants for the occurrence of DARs, 8 cases with long RP' tachycardia were examined. The mechanism of long RP' tachycardia was the orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) involving a slow conducting concealed accessory pathway in 4 cases and uncommon (fast-slow) type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in the other 4 cases. Programmed and rapid ventricular pacing was performed during sinus rhythm and also rapid ventricular pacing during tachycardia (i.e., entrainment). The retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) and the retrograde maximal 1:1 conduction rate of the fast and slow conducting pathways were examined. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVRT, DARs were observed during programmed and rapid ventricular pacing, performed during sinus rhythm and also during entrainment. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVNRT, DARs were observed only during entrainment. The determinants of DARs in cases with long RP' tachycardia were: (1) presence of two different retrogradely conducting pathways; (2) short ERP of the retrograde fast and slow conducting pathways and a short minimal pacing cycle length at which 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction occurs via these pathways; (3) crucial conduction delay in the slow conducting pathway; and (4) preexisting antegrade unidirectional block in the slow conducting pathway or the antegrade block in the slow conducting pathway produced by collision with a previous retrograde impulse during entrainment.

An algorithm for complete enumeration of the mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardias that use multiple atrioventricular, AV nodal, and/or Mahaim pathways

The EINTHOVEN system is a model-based expert system that interprets the cardiac rhythm from the electrocardiogram. It simulates the expected behavior of realistic semi-quantitative cardiac models constructed by heuristic rules to generate interpretations that include both text descriptions and event-by-event causal explanations in the form of ladder diagrams. The simulation has been limited by an inability to predict all possible behaviors of hearts with more than one reentrant circuit. We now describe an algorithm that overcomes this limitation. Its output has been validated by an independent possibility-tree analysis. Timing and storage measurements are presented for models with up to three slow atrioventricular nodal pathways, four atrioventricular pathways, and a single atriofascicular (Mahaim) pathway. This is the first report in the literature of an algorithm that enumerates all possible mechanisms for reentrant supraventricular tachycardias that use atrioventricular, atrioventricular nodal, and/or atriofascicular pathways in humans.

Electrophysiological manifestations of the excitable gap of slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia demonstrated by single extrastimulation

BACKGROUND

Although AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a well-known rhythm disorder, its anatomic substrate and electrophysiological mechanism remain to be defined. Previously, the description of the excitable gap (EG) of AVNRT was based on electrical stimulation performed from sites remote from the reentrant circuit. In the present study, we characterized the EG of AVNRT by atrial extrastimulation close to the putative reentrant circuit in the AV junction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 16 patients (3 men, 13 women; mean age, 45 +/- 13 years) with inducible slow-fast AVNRT (mean cycle length, 353 +/- 52 ms), single extrastimuli with a 10-ms decrement in the premature coupling interval were delivered from the anterosuperior interatrial septum (fast pathway area) and the posteroinferior interatrial septum (slow pathway area) from late diastole until atrial refractoriness. An EG was considered present when resetting or termination of AVNRT was induced by single atrial extrastimulation. The study showed that the duration of the EG of AVNRT was wide, measuring 121 +/- 56 and 123 +/- 47 ms and occupying 33 +/- 11% and 34 +/- 9% of the tachycardia cycle length during single extrastimulation from the slow pathway area and the fast pathway area, respectively. The resetting pattern most commonly manifested as the sum of the coupling interval and the return cycle being less than a fully compensatory pause (two times the basic tachycardia cycle length). However, patterns equal to and greater than a fully compensatory pause were also observed. Of note, in 2 of the 16 patients, atrial extrastimulation from either the fast or slow pathway area also affected the preceding tachycardia cycle length (HH interval), indicating alteration of the anterograde input. In all patients, the curve derived from plotting the coupling interval of extrastimuli against the return cycle during resetting exhibited an "increasing" pattern. The mode of tachycardia termination usually occurred when the premature atrial impulse was orthodromically blocked in the anterograde slow pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

The EG of slow-fast AVNRT is relatively wide, as demonstrated by single atrial extrastimulation from the interatrial septum near the AV junction. Overall, the electrophysiological manifestations of the EG of AVNRT are very similar to those described in AV reciprocating tachycardia incorporating an accessory connection. These findings lend further support to the notion that, in humans, AVNRT involves a reentrant mechanism with a wide excitable gap.

AV nodal-His-Purkinje reentry: a novel form of tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Bundle branch reentry (BBR) typically occurs in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and infra-Hisian conduction system disease. The macroreentrant circuit of BBR is confined to the His-Purkinje system (HPS) and ventricular myocardium. As such, the atrioventricular (AV) node plays no role in the tachycardia circuit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the present study, we identified a novel form of wide complex tachycardia in a patient with coronary disease and severe aortic regurgitation. The tachycardia morphology was right bundle branch block with a left superior axis. Ventriculoatrial block was present during tachycardia. An unusual feature of this rhythm was two sequential His-bundle deflections (H and H') for each ventricular beat of tachycardia. The H'V interval was identical to the HV interval during supraventricular rhythm. Changes in the ventricular cycle length (VV) preceded changes in the HH interval, consistent with retrograde activation of the first His-bundle deflection. Changes in the H'H' interval preceded changes in the VV interval, consistent with anterograde activation of the second His-bundle deflection. Tachycardia could be terminated with ventricular extrastimuli that did not capture the proximal HPS as well as with ventricular extrastimuli that advanced the His deflection, consistent with block in the HPS and in the AV node, respectively. Reproducible termination of the tachycardia following the first His deflection was demonstrated with adenosine, consistent with an upper pivot in the AV node.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified a new form of reentrant tachycardia in which the AV node, HPS, and ventricular myocardium each obligatorily participates in the tachycardia circuit, with the left posterior fascicle and right bundle functioning as the anterograde and retrograde limbs, respectively. Unlike BBR, however, the His bundle is activated twice as the wavefront pivots in the AV node. This model requires longitudinal dissociation at the levels of the AV node and His bundle.

Elimination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia with 2:1 VA block by posteroseptal ablation

AV nodal reentry capable of VA block during tachycardia was successfully eliminated using a posteroseptal ablation pulse delivered well away from the site of earliest atrial activation during tachycardia. A possible explanation is that the arrhythmia represented typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia with transient intra-atrial conduction block during tachycardia.

Ventricular fusion during resetting and entrainment of orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia involving septal accessory pathways. Implications for the differential diagnosis with atrioventricular nodal reentry

BACKGROUND

Ventricular fusion during transient entrainment of orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardias (OAVRT) was originally found to be absent and recently observed only with left ventricular stimulation. However, previous studies were restricted to cases with a left free wall accessory pathway. The hypothesis of the present study was that fusion is likely during resetting and entrainment of OAVRT with right ventricular stimulation if the accessory pathway is septally located, since its insertion is relatively close to the stimulation site. This phenomenon can help in the differential diagnosis with atrioventricular nodal reentry (AVNR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed programmed right ventricular stimulation during regular inducible supraventricular tachycardia with concentric atrial activation in 44 patients--20 with OAVRT and 24 with AVNR. Fusion in the ECG morphology of extrastimuli producing resetting was observed in 19 of 19 OAVRT but in 0 of 11 AVNR reset (P < .001). Transient entrainment was demonstrated in all 31 cases undergoing rapid ventricular pacing (14 OAVRT and 17 AVNR). Entrainment with fusion occurred in 13 of 14 OAVRT and in 0 of 17 AVNR (P < .001). Fusion was critically dependent on the coupling intervals or pacing rates, sometimes having a narrow window for its observation.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative proximity (conduction time) among pacing site, site of entrance to a reentrant circuit, and site of exit from the circuit to the paced chamber are critical for the occurrence of fusion during resetting and/or entrainment. The presence or absence of fusion during these phenomena can help in the differential diagnosis of certain supraventricular tachycardias.

Orthodromic capture of the atrial electrogram during transient entrainment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The reentry circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) has not been fully demonstrated. We hypothesized that if an upper common pathway was present, the atrial electrogram could not be captured orthodromically during transient entrainment of AVNRT by rapid atrial pacing. Based on this hypothesis, the presence of an upper common pathway was investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The atrial electrogram at the recording site of the His bundle potential was identified during induced AVNRT in 9 patients. To entrain AVNRT transiently, rapid pacing from the high right atrium and coronary sinus was applied at a cycle length 10 milliseconds shorter than that of AVNRT and repeated after a decrement of the paced cycle length in steps of 5 milliseconds until AVNRT was interrupted. In 5 of 7 patients, orthodromic capture of the atrial electrogram at the recording site of the His bundle potential was observed during transient entrainment of AVNRT by coronary sinus pacing, ie, the first postpacing interval of the atrial electrogram at the recording site of the His bundle potential was the same as the paced cycle length. In these 5 patients, the mean minimum paced cycle length capable of orthodromic atrial capture was 349 milliseconds, and the mean difference from the cycle length of AVNRT was only 16 milliseconds. During transient entrainment of AVNRT by high right atrial pacing, the atrial electrogram could not be captured orthodromically.

CONCLUSIONS

Observation of orthodromic capture of the atrial electrogram at the recording site of the His bundle potential by coronary sinus pacing ruled out the presence of an upper common pathway in AVNRT, and the concept that perinodal atrial tissue is involved in the reentry circuit of AVNRT was supported.

The response of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to overdrive atrial and ventricular pacing: can it help determine the tachycardia mechanism?

INTRODUCTION

Standard electrophysiologic techniques generally allow discrimination among mechanisms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the response of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to atrial and ventricular overdrive pacing can help determine the tachycardia mechanism.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia were studied. Twenty-two patients had the typical form of atrioventricular (AV) junctional (nodal) reentry, 18 patients had orthodromic AV reentrant tachycardia, 10 patients had atrial tachycardia, and 3 patients had the atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. After paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia was induced, 15-beat trains were introduced in the high right atrium and right ventricular apex sequentially with cycle lengths beginning 10 msec shorter than the spontaneous tachycardia cycle length. The pacing cycle length was shortened in successive trains until a cycle of 200 msec was reached or until tachycardia was terminated. Several responses of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to overdrive pacing were useful in distinguishing atrial tachycardia from other mechanisms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. During decremental atrial overdrive pacing, the curve relating the pacing cycle length to the VA interval on the first beat following the cessation of atrial pacing was flat or upsloping in patients with AV junctional reentry or AV reentrant tachycardia, but variable in patients with atrial tachycardia. AV reentry and AV junctional reentry could always be terminated by overdrive ventricular pacing whereas atrial tachycardia was terminated in only one of ten patients (P < 0.001). The curve relating the ventricular pacing cycle length to the VA interval on the first postpacing beat was flat or upsloping in patients with AV junctional reentry and AV reentry, but variable in patients with atrial tachycardia. The typical form of AV junctional reentry could occasionally be distinguished from other forms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia by the shortening of the AH interval following tachycardia termination during constant rate atrial pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial and ventricular overdrive pacing can rapidly and reliably distinguish atrial tachycardia from other mechanisms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and occasionally assist in the diagnosis of other tachycardia mechanisms. In particular, the ability to exclude atrial tachycardia as a potential mechanism for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia has important implications for the use of catheter ablation techniques to cure paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Atrioventricular nodal reentry: evidence supporting an intranodal location

The exact site of the reentrant circuit in AV nodal reentry remains controversial. While recent ablative techniques have yielded information, the interpretation of which suggests that the atrium is required, other explanations for these interpretations are available. Prior pathophysiological studies with three-dimensional reconstruction of the node suggest that it is a highly anisotropic structure and extends through Koch's Triangle. Data from humans suggesting the atria are not necessary include the presence of AV dissociation during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), depolarization of atrial tissue surrounding the node without affecting SVT, pacing induced AH intervals exceeding those during SVT, and site dependency of a critical AH interval (exceeding atrial refractoriness) that is required for initiation of AV nodal reentry.

Double response of the ventricle during transient entrainment in a common atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

We report a patient with slow-fast atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which double ventricular response was demonstrated during rapid pacing at cycle length of 300 msec or less from the high right atrium. The determinants of double ventricular response during transient entrainment in the present case were: (1) a crucial conduction delay in the slow pathway; (2) the collision between the activation via the antegrade fast pathway (antidromically) of the last paced beat and the activation via the antegrade slow pathway (orthodromically) of the previous paced beat, instead of the unidirectional block in the slow pathway; and (3) the enhanced AV nodal conduction over the antegrade fast pathway.

Significance of ventricular pacing site in manifest entrainment during orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia with left-sided accessory pathway

We examined entrainment by ventricular pacing in six patients during orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) utilizing a left-sided lateral accessory pathway. Constant fusion and progressive fusion were demonstrated in all patients by left ventricular pacing during tachycardia, but in none of the patients by right ventricular pacing. When left ventricular pacing was performed during AVRT, the antidromic wave front from the pacing impulse (n) collided with the orthodromic wave front of the previous pacing beat (n - 1) within the ventricle, therefore, constant fusion and progressive fusion were demonstrated in the surface electrocardiographic QRS complexes. On the other hand, when right ventricular pacing was performed during orthodromic AVRT, the antidromic wave front from the pacing impulse (n) collided with the orthodromic wave front of the previous paced beat (n - 1) within the normal atrioventricular pathway, and constant fusion and progressive fusion were therefore not demonstrated. These phenomena were explained by the relationship of the ventricular pacing site and the reentrant circuit. This study demonstrates the importance of the pacing site in manifest entrainment of orthodromic AVRT during ventricular pacing.

Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the most common form of supraventricular tachycardia, results from conduction through a reentrant circuit comprising fast and slow atrioventricular nodal pathways. Antiarrhythmic-drug therapy is not consistently successful in controlling this rhythm disturbance. Catheter ablation of the fast pathway with radiofrequency current eliminates AVNRT, but it can produce heart block. We hypothesized that catheter ablation of the site of insertion of the slow pathway into the atrium would eliminate AVNRT while leaving normal (fast-pathway) atrioventricular nodal conduction intact.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty patients with symptomatic AVNRT were studied. Retrograde slow-pathway conduction (in which the earliest retrograde atrial potential was recorded at the posterior septum, close to the coronary sinus) was present in 33 patients. The retrograde atrial potential was preceded by a potential consistent with activation of the atrial end of the slow pathway (ASP). In 46 of the 47 patients without retrograde slow-pathway conduction, a potential with the same characteristics as the ASP potential was recorded during sinus rhythm. Radiofrequency current delivered through a catheter to the ASP site (in the posteroseptal right atrium or coronary sinus) abolished or modified slow-pathway conduction in 78 patients, eliminating AVNRT without affecting normal atrioventricular nodal conduction. In the single patient without ASP, the application of radiofrequency current to the proximal coronary sinus ablated the fast pathway and AVNRT: Atrioventricular block occurred in one patient (1.3 percent) with left bundle-branch block, after inadvertent ablation of the right bundle branch. AVNRT has not recurred in any patient during a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 15.5 +/- 11.3 months. Electrophysiologic study 4.3 +/- 3.3 months after ablation in 32 patients demonstrated normal atrioventricular nodal conduction without AVNRT:

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of the atrial end of the slow pathway using radiofrequency current, guided by ASP potentials, can eliminate AVNRT with very little risk of atrioventricular block.

Circus movement atrial flutter in canine sterile pericarditis model. Activation patterns during entrainment and termination of single-loop reentry in vivo

BACKGROUND

Recently, we used a custom designed "jacket" electrode with 127 bipolar electrodes in a flexible nylon matrix to map the total atrial epicardial surface in the in situ canine heart. Atrial flutter in dogs with sterile pericarditis was shown to be due to a single wave front circulating around a combined functional/anatomic obstacle, with the arc of functional conduction block contiguous with one or more of the atrial vessels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the present study, this model was used to analyze the activation pattern during pacing-induced entrainment and termination of single reentrant loops in a syncytium without anatomically predetermined pathways. Sustained atrial flutter was induced in five dogs with 3-5-day-old sterile pericarditis. Atrial pacing at a cycle length 5-30 msec shorter than the spontaneous cycle length entrained the arrhythmia and could result in a "classical" activation pattern, characterized by an antidromic stimulated wave that collided with the reentrant orthodromic wave front of the previous beat at a constant site. However, two variations of this classical activation pattern were also observed: 1) Pacing at short cycle lengths could lead to localized conduction block in antidromic direction, forcing a change in the pathway of the antidromic wave front. This could prevent the expected shift of the site of collision in antidromic direction. 2) The stimulated orthodromic wave front could also use a pathway different from that of the original reentrant impulse, so that a different circuit was active during the pacing period. Termination of atrial flutter by rapid atrial stimulation was associated with progressive slowing and finally blocking of the paced orthodromic wave front and a progressive shift of the site of collision in antidromic direction. The occurrence of conduction block was determined by the cycle length of stimulation and the number of stimulated beats. A longer train at the critical cycle length or the critical number of beats at a shorter cycle length could reinduce the same reentrant circuit or a different reentrant circuit, respectively, during stimulated cycles following the beat that terminated reentry.

CONCLUSIONS

The epicardial activation sequence during entrainment of reentrant arrhythmias does not necessarily follow a standard activation pattern. Instead, the stimulated orthodromic as well as the antidromic wave front might use a pathway different from that of the original reentrant wave front. The mechanisms of termination, failure of termination, and reinitiation of single-loop reentry are similar to those in the "figure-eight" reentrant circuit.

Recovery of retrograde fast pathway excitability in the atrioventricular node reentrant circuit after concealed anterograde impulse penetration

The recovery of the retrograde fast pathway excitability in atrioventricular (AV) node reentry has been difficult to assess with ventricular extrastimulation because of difficulty in achieving sufficiently short intranodal coupling intervals and the potential interposition of "lower common pathway" nodal tissue. To circumvent these methodologic obstacles in 10 patients with inducible AV node reentrant tachycardia, a fixed atrial extrastimulus (A2) coupled to a basic atrial drive (A1) at a cycle length of 500 ms was utilized to reproducibly initiate AV node reentrant echoes. A ventricular extrastimulus (V3) was then introduced after A2 at progressively shorter coupling intervals (A2V3) in an attempt to pre-excite the retrograde fast pathway after concealed anterograde penetration by A2. In six patients, retrograde fast pathway pre-excitation was achieved at critical A2V3 intervals, as evidenced by the appearance of A3 by up to 28 +/- 6 ms in advance of the expected first AV node reentrant echo. In five of the six cases, the V3A3 interval was virtually unaltered (less than or equal to 5 ms decrease) when A2 was omitted. In seven patients, at a critically short A2V3 coupling interval (195 +/- 27 ms ), V3 abruptly failed to elicit A3 and concomitantly abolished all AV node echoes; yet when A2 was omitted, an A3 response returned, with V3A3 identical to previous values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reappraisals of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: lessons learned from surgical treatment

The exact site of reentrant circuit involved in the atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia was questioned. Seven patients (6 females and 1 male), aged 21 to 64 years (mean = 40 +/- 17 years), with refractory nodal reentry, underwent surgical treatment. The associated cardiac diseases included rheumatic valvar disease in two and an atrial septal defect. Electrophysiologic studies before surgery showed dual nodal pathways in 4 patients. Right atrial endocardial mapping was performed and the earliest retrograde atrial activation during tachycardia was mapped to the apex of the triangle of Koch in 6 patients and near the orifice of coronary sinus in one. Perinodal dissection was performed according to the location of earliest retrograde atrial activity. Care was taken to preserve as much of the atrioventricular node and its arterial supply as was possible. Immediately after surgery, conduction in an antegrade direction recovered and the tachycardia could no longer be reproduced. There was no surgical mortality or morbidity. At 10 to 26 months of follow-up, all patients remain free of tachycardia without antiarrhythmic drugs. Four patients underwent repeated electrophysiologic studies at 2 weeks to 6 months after surgery. Dual nodal pathways were no longer demonstrated. It is concluded that the perinodal atrial tissue plays a part in the atrioventricular nodal reentry, and that surgical dissection is a simple and effective treatment for patients with refractory atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia.

Characterization of double potentials in human atrial flutter: studies during transient entrainment

Double potentials, defined as atrial electrograms with two discrete deflections per beat separated by an isoelectric interval or a low amplitude baseline, have been observed during right atrial endocardial mapping of human atrial flutter. In this study, bipolar atrial electrograms were recorded during atrial flutter (mean cycle length 235 +/- 27 ms [+/- SEM]) from the high right atrium, the His bundle region, the coronary sinus and at least 30 right atrial endocardial mapping sites in 10 patients. Double potentials were recorded from the right atrium in all patients during atrial flutter. Double potentials were evaluated during transient entrainment of atrial flutter by rapid high right atrial pacing in 5 of the 10 patients. In four of these five patients during such transient entrainment 1) one deflection of the double potential was captured with a relatively short activation time (mean interval 89 +/- 45 ms) and the other deflection was captured with a relatively long activation time (mean interval 233 +/- 24 ms), producing a paradoxical decrease in the short interdeflection interval from a mean of 75 +/- 20 ms to a mean of 59 +/- 24 ms; and 2) the configuration of the double potential remained similar to that observed during spontaneous atrial flutter. On pacing termination 1) the two double potential deflections were found to be associated with two different atrial flutter complexes in the electrocardiogram (ECG); 2) the previous double potential deflection relation resumed; and 3) when sinus rhythm was present, the double potentials were replaced by a broad, low amplitude electrogram recording at the same site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The excitable gap in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Characterization with ventricular extrastimuli and pharmacologic intervention

Our purpose was to characterize the excitable gap during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) to elucidate the electrophysiologic substrate of this clinically familiar microreentrant arrhythmia. Accordingly, in 11 patients with classic slow-fast AVNRT (mean cycle length, 342 +/- 41 msec), a single ventricular extrastimulus (V2) was periodically delivered after a spontaneous tachycardia beat (V1) until ventricular refractoriness was reached. With this technique, an excitable gap was considered present when atrial preexcitation of at least 20 msec could be achieved along with tachycardia resetting (noncompensatory pause after V2). The range of V1V2 intervals that resulted in atrial preexcitation constituted the preexcitation zone. Five patients (45%) showed evidence of an excitable gap at baseline, with a maximal atrial preexcitation achievable of 33 +/- 6 msec, representing 9 +/- 1% of the tachycardia cycle length. Verapamil was then administered to all 11 patients with the purpose of slowing the anterograde tachycardia wavefront before arrival of V2. This resulted in widening of the preexcitation zone in three patients by a mean of 50 +/- 37 msec, with a corresponding increase in maximal atrial preexcitation to 70 +/- 32 msec, or 16 +/- 4% of AVNRT cycle length, and the appearance of atrial preexcitation in two patients who lacked it during baseline. In the remaining six patients, AVNRT was not sustained after verapamil or was too unstable for evaluation. During baseline, V2A2 conduction time increased by only 5 +/- 3 msec throughout the preexcitation zone, with values at the outer border unchanged after verapamil, implying a fully excitable gap in the retrograde limb. In all patients with a preexcitation zone, AVNRT was consistently reset by V2, both at baseline and after verapamil, with a "flat" but mainly "increasing" response pattern as V1V2 was shortened. Hence, a significant number of patients with AVNRT have evidence of an excitable gap whose demonstrability can be facilitated by pharmacologic intervention; documentation of an increasing resetting response pattern, most apparent after verapamil, provides new evidence for a reentrant mechanism in AVNRT; and while not definitively proven, the presence of a fully excitable gap during AVNRT is most consistent with a microreentry circuit that incorporates an anatomic obstacle.

Electrophysiologic manifestations of the excitable gap of orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia demonstrated by single extrastimulation

To assess the electrophysiologic characteristics of the excitable gap, 12 patients with orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reciprocating tachycardia were studied. During tachycardia, 8 patients used a left-sided and 4 patients a right-sided anomalous bypass tract for retrograde conduction. QRS complex-synchronized single extrastimuli were delivered from high right atrium, right ventricular apex and coronary sinus, respectively, scanning the whole cycle length of tachycardia. An excitable gap was determined to be present if tachycardia resetting or tachycardia termination occurred. The duration of the excitable gap varied among different pacing sites and occupied 0 to 48% (mean 17 +/- 16) of basic tachycardia cycle length (240 to 480 ms, mean 327 +/- 70). Three patterns of tachycardia resetting were observed: the sum of coupling interval and return cycle being (1) less than a fully compensatory pause in 12 of 12 patients, (2) more than a fully compensatory pause in 5 of 12 patients and (3) equal to a fully compensatory pause in 2 of 12 patients, depending on extent of AV nodal conduction delay exhibited in return cycle. Tachycardia termination was possible when extrastimuli were delivered from right ventricular apex and coronary sinus but not from high right atrium, and only when basic tachycardia cycle length was greater than or equal to 290 ms in 7 of 12 patients. Tachycardia termination was accounted for by development of orthodromic conduction block in AV node in 7 of 7 patients and in bypass tract in 2 of 7 patients. Therefore, site of extra-stimulation and basic tachycardia cycle length affect electrophysiologic manifestations of excitable gap. Further, functional properties of the AV node influence patterns of tachycardia resetting and are primarily responsible for tachycardia termination during programmed single extrastimulation.

Use of transient entrainment during ventricular tachycardia to localize a critical area in the reentry circuit for ablation

We have previously shown that demonstration of any of the criteria for transient entrainment is possible only when pacing is performed orthodromically proximal to the area of slow conduction in a reentrant circuit with an excitable gap. Pacing orthodromically distal to the area of slow conduction will not permit demonstration of the transient entrainment criteria (concealed entrainment). Additionally, the demonstration of one form of concealed entrainment, namely pacing during a ventricular tachycardia from a site which increases the tachycardia to the pacing rate but does not change the morphology of the QRS complexes, we suggest also identifies the area of slow conduction is a keystone for maintenance of the reentrant circuit, ablation of this area should be expected to provide effective therapy of the tachycardia. Thus, we propose that using the principles of transient entrainment, one should be able to localize a critical area of slow conduction in the reentrant circuit of a ventricular tachycardia, ablate it effectively, and thereby successfully treat the ventricular tachycardia.

Shift of atrial reentrant tachycardia with transient entrainment to an uncommon and a common type of atrial flutter

Atrial reentrant tachycardia (ART) which demonstrated transient entrainment shifted to an uncommon type of atrial flutter (AF) with premature atrial stimulation, and then returned to ART spontaneously. Subsequently, this ART shifted to a common type of AF by rapid atrial pacing, which was further transformed into an uncommon type of AF and finally terminated by rapid atrial pacing. The mechanism of AF in clinical cases is still controversial, but in this case, AF, both uncommon and common types, is considered due to macro-reentry within the atria. To explain the shift of ART to AF and mutual transformation between common and uncommon type of AF, we made a schematic figure of reentry loop within the atria of ART and AF.

Cryosurgical ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry: histologic localization of the proximal common pathway

A method using cryosurgery has been previously described to selectively ablate atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia while preserving intact atrioventricular conduction. The purpose of the present study was to define the histologic features of the cryolesions in relationship to the specialized conduction system. In 12 adult dogs a series of nine discrete cryolesions was placed along the perimeter of the triangle of Koch while continuously monitoring the His bundle electrogram. All animals survived the operation and maintained intact atrioventricular conduction. At 14 weeks after surgery the hearts were sectioned and examined. In all 12 animals there was a confluent mass of dense fibrous tissue present in the lower atrial septum that was in immediate proximity to but did not involve the atrioventricular node-His bundle. The ablation of perinodal tissue with preservation of the specialized conduction system with the use of this cryosurgical technique was confirmed. It is likely that the cryoablated perinodal tissue represents the proximal common pathway of the circuit for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia.

A fourth criterion for transient entrainment: the electrogram equivalent of progressive fusion

Prior data pertaining to transient entrainment and associated phenomena have been best explained by pacing capture of a reentrant circuit. On this basis, we hypothesized that rapid pacing from a single site of two different constant pacing rates could constantly capture an appropriately selected bipolar electrogram recording site from one direction with a constant stimulus-to-electrogram interval during pacing at one rate, yet be constantly captured from another direction with a different constant stimulus-to-electrogram interval when pacing at a different constant pacing rate. To test this hypothesis, we studied a group of patients, each with a representative tachycardia (ventricular tachycardia, circus-movement tachycardia involving an atrioventricular bypass pathway, atrial tachycardia, and atrial flutter). For each tachycardia, pacing was performed from a single site for at least two different constant rates faster than the spontaneous rate of the tachycardia. We observed in these patients that a local bipolar recording site was constantly captured from different directions at two different pacing rates without interrupting the tachycardia at pacing termination. The evidence that the same site was captured from a different direction at two different pacing rates was supported by demonstrating a change in conduction time to that site associated with a change in the bipolar electrogram morphology at that site when comparing pacing at each rate. The mean conduction time (stimulus-to-recording site electrogram interval) was 319 +/- 69 msec while pacing at a mean cycle length of 265 +/- 50 msec, yet only 81 +/- 38 msec while pacing at a second mean cycle length of 233 +/- 51 msec, a mean change in conduction time of 238 +/- 56 msec. Remarkably, the faster pacing rate resulted in a shorter conduction time. The fact that the same electrode recording site was activated from different directions without interruption of the spontaneous tachycardia at pacing termination is difficult to explain on any mechanistic basis other than reentry. Also, these changes in conduction time and electrogram morphology occurred in parallel with the demonstration of progressive fusion beats on the electrocardiogram, the latter being an established criterion for transient entrainment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Characteristics of entrainment during autodecremental atrial and ventricular stimulation

The entrainment characteristics of orthodromic circus movement tachycardias occurring during autodecremental atrial and ventricular stimulation were studied in 9 patients with manifest Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The phenomenon occurred in 34 of 38 episodes of tachycardia during autodecremental atrial stimulation. It was not seen in 4 episodes because the first impulse penetrating the circuit terminated the arrhythmia. Invariably, the HH and VV intervals were not equal to, but longer than, the stimulus-stimulus intervals, thus not fulfilling the definition of "classic" (constant cycle length) entrainment postulated by Okumura et al. Furthermore, the first 2 of the 3 diagnostic criteria were not demonstrated and the third only could be demonstrated in 7 episodes. Tachycardia termination was achieved in all 38 episodes. Entrainment occurred during autodecremental ventricular stimulation in 79 of 80 episodes, with the AA and H-H- intervals (when visible) being equal to the corresponding paced cycle lengths. Moreover, the intervals between the last paced ventricular beat and the first ventricular beat of the resumed tachycardia were invariably longer than the last stimulus-stimulus intervals. These characteristics were those which Okumura et al attributed to "concealed" entrainment. Tachycardia termination was achieved in 77 of 80 episodes. In summary: (1) autodecremental atrial pacing produced a specific form of entrainment that did not fulfill the "classic" definition of Okumura et al; (2) autodecremental ventricular pacing consistently produced "concealed" entrainment; and (3) autodecremental stimulation was very effective in terminating 115 of 118 (98%) of episodes of circus movement tachycardias.

Resetting of ventricular tachycardia with electrocardiographic fusion: incidence and significance

The incidence and significance of fusion of the QRS complex during resetting of sustained ventricular tachycardias (VTs) was determined in 53 VTs induced by programmed stimulation in 46 patients with prior myocardial infarction. All 53 VTs were reset with one or two extrastimuli delivered at the right ventricular apex (RVA); 29 (54.7%) demonstrated fusion of the VT QRS complex coincident with the extrastimulus resetting the VT. Activation time at the RVA during VT (measured from the onset of the VT QRS complex to the first rapid deflection of the RVA electrogram) was longer in VT reset with fusion compared with those without fusion (91 +/- 30 vs 33 +/- 32 msec; p less than .001). A right bundle branch block VT QRS morphology and a rightward and inferior axis were more common in VT reset with electrocardiographic (ECG) fusion. Additionally, the shortest return cycle following the extrastimulus resetting the VT was shorter in VT reset with ECG fusion compared with those without (327 +/- 66 vs 423 +/- 84 msec; p less than .001). Fusion of the endocardial electrogram recorded at the site of VT origin was noted in 11 of 15 VTs that were reset while a recording catheter was positioned at this site, including all eight VTs with evidence of surface ECG fusion and three of seven VTs without fusion. Seventeen VTs were reset from the right ventricular outflow tract as well as the RVA; eight demonstrated QRS fusion at both sites, five from the right ventricular outflow tract only, and four from neither site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Incidence of reentry with an excitable gap in ventricular tachycardia: a prospective evaluation utilizing transient entrainment

The demonstration of transient entrainment has been proposed as evidence of reentry, with an excitable gap as the probable mechanism of tachycardia. A prospective series of 27 consecutive patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation was studied to determine the frequency with which transient entrainment can be demonstrated and to define the optimal location of pacing and recording electrodes. In all patients, electrodes for pacing and recording were placed in both the left and right ventricles during electrophysiologic study. Among the 19 patients in whom the response to rapid pacing could be evaluated (25 episodes of ventricular tachycardia), transient entrainment was demonstrated in 79% (76% of episodes). Ten of 12 episodes of ventricular tachycardia with a left bundle branch block QRS configuration in lead V1 and 9 of 13 episodes with a right bundle branch block QRS configuration could be transiently entrained (p = NS). Transient entrainment was demonstrated for 8 of 11 episodes of ventricular tachycardia with a left bundle branch block configuration during pacing from the left ventricle, but for only 2 of 10 episodes during pacing from the right ventricular apex (p less than 0.05). Conversely, 9 of 13 episodes of ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration were transiently entrained during pacing from the right ventricular apex, but 0 of 10 episodes were transiently entrained by left ventricular pacing (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Region of slow conduction in sustained ventricular tachycardia: direct endocardial recordings and functional characterization in humans

Direct endocardial recording from a discrete region of slow conduction in the left ventricle was performed in a patient during sustained ventricular tachycardia. The tachycardia had a right bundle branch block and superior axis configuration with the earliest site of endocardial activation in the posterolateral left ventricle. At this site, the left ventricular electrogram during the tachycardia displayed two deflections with distinctly different responses to rapid pacing. During rapid pacing from the right ventricular apex, one deflection was transiently entrained, representing activation of the ventricle distal to a region of slow conduction in the reentrant circuit. However, the other deflection was not entrained and arose from activation proximal to this region. At a critically rapid pacing rate, interruption of the tachycardia was associated with conduction block in the region of slow conduction, as demonstrated by dissociation of the two deflections on the posterolateral left ventricular electrogram. At pacing rates that transiently entrained but did not terminate the tachycardia, decremental properties of conduction were demonstrated in the region of slow conduction, but not in the rest of the reentrant circuit. These responses of the posterolateral left ventricular electrogram to pacing during ventricular tachycardia strongly suggest that the recordings bracketed a discrete region of slow conduction in the left ventricle that was critical for the maintenance of ventricular tachycardia. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that this region of slow conduction in the left ventricle had decremental conduction properties and was the site of block during rapid pacing at rates sufficient to interrupt the tachycardia.