Addition of nifedipine to maximal nitrate and beta-adrenoreceptor blocker therapy in coronary artery disease

Cardiovascular effects of nifedipine in the dog

This study was designed to measure certain cardiovascular effects of 2 or 11 micrograms nifedipine/kg body weight given intravenously to dogs anesthetized with fentanyl-droperidol-pentobarbital. Parameters measured were: cardiac output, stroke volume, stroke work, systemic arterial pressure and vascular resistance, splenic weight (a measure of venous capacitance), and fractionation of cardiac output to many tissues. In response to doses of nifedipine, systemic vascular resistance decreased, cardiac output and flows to most organs increased, and heart rate, stroke work, and splenic capacitance were unchanged. The flow to the diaphragm increased more than that to other organs.

Nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate alone and in combination for patients with chronic stable angina: a double-blind crossover study

Since not all patients tolerate beta-blockers, the efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate was evaluated alone and in combination in patients with stable angina pectoris. The study was a randomized double-blind crossover design with patients titrated to maximally tolerated doses of both drugs. Phases included isosorbide dinitrate alone, nifedipine alone, and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine in combination, with efficacy determined by stress testing. Eleven men and one woman patient with a mean age of 60 years and a mean of five anginal episodes/week completed the study. Patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I, II, and III. With nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone, patients had fewer angina attacks/week (p less than 0.02), exercised longer before experiencing angina (p less than 0.03), and had less ST segment depression during (p less than 0.03) or after (p less than 0.05) exercise. When patients received isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine, only time to onset of angina during exercise (p less than 0.05) was significantly different from the response with isosorbide dinitrate alone. Analysis of variance between nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine was not significant. Diastolic blood pressure with isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine (p less than 0.04) was lower than with isosorbide dinitrate alone. No significant differences in systolic blood pressure were noted between the treatment groups. The drugs alone and in combination were relatively well tolerated. Nifedipine alone may be superior to isosorbide dinitrate alone. The combination of isosorbide dinitrate plus nifedipine demonstrated no advantage over nifedipine alone compared with isosorbide dinitrate alone.

Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review

Calcium-channel antagonists and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have become important modalities in the cardiovascular therapeutic armamentarium. These drugs are often administered as monotherapy to a wide range of cardiological patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and other diseases. Since within each class these drugs exhibit pharmacologic differences, it follows that their effectiveness varies in different disease states and that they exhibit a wide variety of side effects. In an attempt to optimize therapy, the individual drugs from these two classes can be combined; and the efficaciousness and side-effect profile of various combinations between calcium-channel antagonists and beta blockers are discussed in this review. Recommendations as to which patients may benefit from a combination and as to which patients may be harmed by the combination therapy will be made. Very few studies have compared the safety and efficacy of a single agent with the combination and with placebo in a controlled randomized fashion. To determine which therapy is superior and to determine which combination one should recommend under what circumstances, such placebo-controlled, randomized trials are a necessity, and will hopefully be performed although the complexity is enormous.

The role of nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium antagonists in stable angina pectoris

Numerous controlled studies have shown that nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium antagonists are effective in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and hemodynamic effects of these agents are different, and thus combination therapy offers additive improvement and also counterbalancing of the undesirable side effects of each drug. The choice of therapy depends on the severity of symptoms, associated diseases, compliance, side effects, and status of left ventricular function. The main mechanism of improvement is a decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption, though an increase in coronary blood flow is another potential reason for the use of calcium blockers. This review considers the properties of these drugs, their mechanism of action, and the results of randomized studies.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part IV: Side effects and contraindications drug interactions and combinations

With the correct selection of drug and patient, the calcium antagonists as a group can be remarkably effective at relatively low cost of serious side effects. Almost all side effects are dose related. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil (or diltiazem) is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine which actually has the most marked negative inotropic effect. Yet caution is required when even calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide. The most marked interaction with digoxin is that with verapamil, which may raise digoxin levels by over 50%. Combination therapy of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers is increasingly common, and is probably safest in the case of dihydropyridines. Other combinations being explored are those with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.

Efficacy of the calcium antagonist isradipine in angina pectoris

Thirty-six patients with chronic, stable angina pectoris were studied during 2-week treatment periods in which they received, in a randomized double-blind, crossover study, a new calcium entry blocking agent, isradipine, 7.5 mg three times daily or placebo. Antianginal efficacy was determined by treadmill exercise testing carried out 3 and 9 hours after drug administration on the final day of each treatment period. During placebo therapy, treadmill exercise time to the onset of angina (P1) and to the development of moderate angina (P2) was similar at 3 and 9 hours and similar to the placebo run-in period. During isradipine therapy, treadmill exercise time 3 hours after dosing was greater than with placebo therapy (P1 312 +/- 23.0 vs. 267 +/- 19.5 seconds, p less than 0.001; P2 410 +/- 20.2 vs. 355 +/- 18.8 seconds, p less than 0.002). Nine hours after drug administration, the results of exercise testing were similar to placebo.

Comparison of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate when added to maximal propranolol therapy in stable angina pectoris

A study was performed to compare isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine as adjunctive therapy in 14 patients with coronary artery disease and stable angina pectoris taking maximal beta-blocking drugs. Drug titration phases ensured maximal therapy of propranolol, isosorbide or nifedipine. The combination of nifedipine and propranolol was more effective than the combination of isosorbide and propranolol in reducing angina and increasing exercise capacity (323 vs 416 seconds, p less than 0.005) during exercise treadmill testing. Nifedipine produced a greater reduction in systolic blood pressure at submaximal exercise than isosorbide. Global and regional ejection fraction at rest and exercise was assessed with radionuclide ventriculography. The substitution of nifedipine for isosorbide depressed the global ejection fraction at rest (0.61 to 0.56 p less than 0.05) and produced a slight improvement in exercise ejection fraction (0.47 to 0.51, difference not significant). The decrease in ejection fraction from rest to exercise was 0.14 to 0.04 with nifedipine (p less than 0.005). The benefit of nifedipine compared with isosorbide occurred in regions with marked exercise-induced ischemia. In patients treated with maximal beta-blocking therapy, nifedipine is an effective alternative to isosorbide as a combination agent with propranolol. The salutary effects of nifedipine included afterload reduction with exercise and possible improvements in coronary blood supply.

Silent myocardial ischemia: clinical characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and implications for treatment

A great deal of interest is being generated by the possibility that patients with coronary artery disease and typical angina pectoris may also experience periods of ischemia during activities of daily living that are not necessarily associated with angina or increased myocardial oxygen demand. It might be that the majority of ischemic episodes during daily life are not preceded by increases in myocardial oxygen demand, and are probably related to dynamic changes in coronary blood flow. Questions still remain, however, regarding the prevalence of asymptomatic ischemia in patients who present with effort angina and positive results on exercise tolerance tests. Therefore, in susceptible patients with coronary artery disease, calcium channel blockers, especially nifedipine, may be of particular benefit since they decrease myocardial oxygen demand during effort and may increase coronary blood flow, thereby aborting asymptomatic ischemia, which tends to occur at low levels of cardiac oxygen demand. It appears that a greater awareness of the total ischemic burden, i.e., the sum total of symptomatic and asymptomatic and exertional and nonexertional ischemia, may facilitate individualization of therapy for patients with coronary artery disease. Agents that both reduce myocardial oxygen demand and improve coronary blood flow, such as nifedipine, may particularly benefit individuals whose ischemia may be both asymptomatic and symptomatic, and who seem to constitute the majority of patients with coronary artery disease.

Effect of nifedipine on left ventricular function in patients with angina pectoris

Calcium channel blocking agents function as negative inotropic agents when they are administered in vitro directly to the myocardium. In patients with coronary artery disease, however, such direct effects are attenuated by a number of other factors, including decreased afterload and resultant reflex sympathetic stimulation, increased coronary blood flow with improved myocardial perfusion, and protection of mitochondria. Nifedipine has not been observed to cause significant left ventricular depression in patients with angina pectoris; this is primarily due to peripheral arteriolar vasodilatation, which reduces impedance of left ventricular ejection. In addition, the relief of myocardial ischemia by nifedipine plays a major role in improving systolic and diastolic function. The clinical response to calcium channel blockers may differ in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for whom the factor of fluctuating ischemia is less important.