Basic and clinical cardiac electrophysiology of encainide

Encainide

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent having little or no effect on action-potential duration or maximum diastolic potential but decreasing the maximum rate of phase O depolarization as well as increasing atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In intact animals or humans, encainide increases the AH, PR, QRS, and H-V intervals while not affecting the sinus node cycle length or JT interval. QT interval increases only by the concomitant increase in the QRS interval. Encainide is metabolized to O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), both of which are also antiarrhythmics with similar pharmacology to encainide. Encainide and its metabolites have little negative inotropic activity and ancillary pharmacology. Consequently, encainide has little or no effect on hemodynamic variables in patients with either normal or compromised cardiac function. The drug is well tolerated, with side effects being mainly those associated with its local anesthetic activity such as blurred vision and dizziness. Encainide is particularly effective in patients with excessive premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and less so in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Like all antiarrhythmics, encainide may aggravate or precipitate new arrhythmias (proarrhythmia). The overall incidence of proarrhythmia is about 10%, with less occurring in patients with PVCs and more in those with sustained VT; also, the incidence of proarrhythmia is higher in patients with underlying heart disease. Encainide is also effective for the treatment of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, PSVT (both PAF as well as reentry of the nodal or W-P-W type), and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Its dosage and role in antiarrhythmic therapy are discussed.

New antiarrhythmic agents in pediatrics

This article reviews recent developments in the pharmacologic management of arrhythmias in children and provides specific information about six newer antiarrhythmic agents. With the current increase in recognition, frequency, and complexity of rhythm disturbances in children, pediatricians can expect to encounter children on these antiarrhythmic medications in their practices with increasing frequency.

Effects of propafenone on ventricular arrhythmias: double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study

Propafenone is a new class Ic antiarrhythmic compound with a broad pharmacologic profile. In this study, its dose-response relationship was examined in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled five treatment parallel design protocol. Patients enrolled had heart disease with Lown grade 2 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (greater than or equal to 30/hr) documented on 24-hour Holter recordings. Propafenone was compared in four doses (337.5, 450, 675, and 900 mg/day) to placebo. The double-blind phase lasted 2 weeks. Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 171 were men and 55 were women; their mean age was 59.8 years and 85% were Caucasian and 4% were black. The arrhythmias were symptomatic in 173. Twenty (8.8%) withdrew from the study before completion: 15 had adverse reactions, two had intercurrent illnesses, and three withdrew for administrative reasons. In one patient, the density of arrhythmia appeared to increase with propafenone. Side effects were of central nervous system or gastrointestinal origin; less than 5% of patients developed first-degree atrioventricular block or intraventricular conduction defect. There were no deaths in the study. The occurrence of side effects was not related to dose. Propafenone had no effect on heart rate. It increased the PR interval at all doses (9% to 22% compared to placebo at baseline; p less than 0.01) at 450 to 900 mg/day after 2 weeks of therapy. The drug increased the QRS duration at all doses, highly significantly at 675 mg/day (8.5 msec; p less than 0.01) and at 900 mg/day (15.7 msec; p less than 0.01) after 2 weeks of therapy. Only at the highest dose was the QTc slightly but significantly (14.3 msec; p less than 0.01) increased. Propafenone exerted a dose-dependent effect on PVCs recorded on serial 24-hour Holter recordings: compared to placebo, at 2 weeks 337.5 mg/day reduced PVCs by 70.8% (p less than 0.05), 450 mg/day reduced PVCs by 82.0% (p less than 0.01), 675 mg/day reduced PVCs by 90.2% (p less than 0.01) and 900 mg/day reduced PVCs by 95.3% (p less than 0.01). The effects of the two highest doses of propafenone were significantly greater than those of 337.5 mg/day. In 68% of the patients receiving 900 mg/day, 80% or greater reduction in total PVCs was found. In addition, there was a greater than 90% decrease in ventricular couplets, and 96% decrease in ventricular tachycardia (VT) beats. Propafenone eliminated PVCs in 8% of all patients, ventricular couplets in 58%, and VT beats in 91%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Noninvasive evaluation of indecainide for serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Indecainide, a new class 1C agent, was administered to 16 patients with a history of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Evaluation of drug effect consisted of acute testing with 125 mg followed by a period of maintenance therapy. Efficacy, as evaluated with both ambulatory monitoring and exercise testing, was defined as total elimination of runs of ventricular tachycardia, greater than 90% reduction in couplets and greater than 50% decrease in ventricular premature complex. During acute drug testing 9 of the 16 patients responded to the drug. Four patients did not receive maintenance therapy with indecainide, because of toxic side effects. Of the remaining 12 patients, 7 responded to indecainide based on monitoring, 5 responded judged by exercise testing and 4 when both monitoring and exercise testing were considered. There was no correlation between dose, blood level of drug and effect on arrhythmia. In this small group acute drug testing did not appear to predict the response to the drug during maintenance therapy. Neurologic side effects were reported by 5 patients. Aggravation of arrhythmia occurred in 5 patients, 3 of whom had this complication during acute drug testing and 2 during maintenance therapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction, measured before and during therapy, decreased from an average of 43% to 35% (p less than 0.005). A reduction was observed irrespective of baseline left ventricular function. Indecainide is an effective antiarrhythmic agent in a small number of highly selected patients with serious ventricular arrhythmia, but potentially serious side effects limit its usefulness.

Newer antiarrhythmic drugs

The effective management of cardiac arrhythmias remains a major challenge in cardiovascular therapeutics. The management of arrhythmias encompasses a wide spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in patients with various cardiac diagnoses and different degrees of myocardial dysfunction. A number of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs that have either recently been released or appear promising are reviewed in this article. Drugs are described with respect to their basic pharmacology, electrophysiologic actions, pharmacokinetics and metabolism, hemodynamics, antiarrhythmic effects, side effects, interactions, indications, and dosage.

New antiarrhythmic drugs: tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, encainide, and amiodarone

Tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, encainide, and amiodarone are antiarrhythmic agents that have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for general use in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. All five agents are effective in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, whereas encainide, flecainide, and amiodarone are also useful in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (although not yet approved for these indications). Tocainide and mexiletine are similar to lidocaine and are as effective as quinidine in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Encainide and flecainide are superior to quinidine for the control of ventricular ectopic beats and as effective as quinidine for patients with ventricular tachycardia. Amiodarone is the most effective agent available for treating patients with ventricular tachycardia, but it is also the most toxic antiarrhythmic agent and should be used only when other antiarrhythmic drugs have not been effective or tolerated.

Encainide: its electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects, pharmacokinetics, and safety

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that has been under clinical investigation for the last decade. Laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated it to be a potent suppressor of ventricular extrasystoles. It is effective in approximately one-half of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The preliminary experience in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias indicates that the drug is particularly effective in arrhythmias associated with an accessory pathway. Side effects most commonly include blurred vision, nausea, heart block, and proarrhythmic effects. The hemodynamic effect of oral encainide are insignificant in patients with well-preserved left ventricular function. Despite minimal myocardial depression in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, there is the potential for worsening of heart failure. Encainide has a short half-life of 3 hours, but has 2 active metabolites with longer half-lives. No clinically significant drug interaction has been demonstrated with encainide therapy.