Direct cardiac and peripheral vascular effects of intracoronary and intravenous nifedipine

Pressure induces intracellular calcium changes in juxtaglomerular cells in perfused afferent arterioles

Calcium (Ca(2+)) has an important role in nearly all types of cellular secretion, with a particularly novel role in the juxtaglomerular (JG) cells in the kidney. In JG cells, Ca(2+) inhibits renin secretion, which is a major regulator of blood pressure and renal hemodynamics. However, whether alterations in afferent arteriolar (Af-Art) pressure change intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in JG cells and whether [Ca(2+)](i) comes from extracellular or intracellular sources remains unknown. We hypothesize that increases in perfusion pressure in the Af-Art result in elevations in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells. We isolated and perfused Af-Art of C57BL6 mice and measured changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells in response to perfusion pressure changes. The JG cells' [Ca(2+)](i) was 93.3±2.2 nM at 60 mm Hg perfusion pressure and increased to 111.3±13.4, 119.6±7.3, 130.3±2.9 and 140.8±12.1 nM at 80, 100, 120 and 140 mm Hg, respectively. At 120 mm Hg, increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were reduced in mice receiving the following treatments: (1) the mechanosensitive cation channel blocker, gadolinium (94.6±7.5 nM); (2) L-type calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (105.8±7.5 nM); and (3) calcium-free solution plus ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (96.0±5.8 nM). Meanwhile, the phospholipase C inhibitor, inositol triphosphate receptor inhibitor, T-type calcium channel blocker, N-type calcium channel blocker and Ca(2+)-ATPase inhibitor did not influence changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in JG cells. In summary, JG cell [Ca(2+)](i) rise as perfusion pressure increases; furthermore, the calcium comes from extracellular sources, specifically mechanosensitive cation channels and L-type calcium channels.

Vasodilator response to nifedipine in human coronary arteries with endothelial dysfunction

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate nifedipine-induced epicardial and microvascular response in human coronary arteries with and without endothelial dysfunction and intimal thickening. The investigation was performed in 70 patients 5 +/- 5 months after heart transplantation. Coronary vasomotor function was determined with intracoronary acetylcholine adenosine, and nifedipine, respectively. Intravascular ultrasound was used to detect significant intimal hyperplasia. In a subgroup (n = 38), coronary sinus and aortic endothelin concentrations were determined. Epicardial dilation to nifedipine was significantly enhanced in coronary arteries with endothelial dysfunction (p = 0.04), whereas adenosine-induced epicardial dilation was attenuated in segments with endothelial dysfunction (p = 0.002). In cases of intimal hyperplasia, nifedipine-mediated distal vasodilation was increased compared with normal segments (p = 0.03). Coronary flow index nifedipine was enhanced in patients with microvascular endothelial dysfunction (p = 0.037). A trend was observed between high endothelin plasma levels in the coronary sinus and an increased microvasodilation to nifedipine (p = 0.04). The study shows that epicardial and microvascular dilation to nifedipine is enhanced in the setting of coronary endothelial dysfunction, suggesting supersensitive dilator response. The association between microvascular response to nifedipine and endothelin levels in the coronary sinus needs further clarification.

Effects of nicardipine and nitroglycerin on perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

Perioperative myocardial ischemic episodes are predictive of adverse cardiac outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. We compared the efficacy of continuous infusions of nicardipine (group NIC) and nitroglycerin (group NTG) in reducing the frequency and severity of myocardial ischemic episodes. Patients received either a nicardipine infusion, 0.7 to 1.4 microg/kg/min (n = 30), nitroglycerin infusion, 0.5 to 1 microg/kg/min (n = 30), or neither medication (group C; n = 17) after aortic occlusion clamp release and for 24 hours postoperatively. Myocardial ischemic episodes were considered as ST segment depressions or elevations of 1 mm or greater from baseline, each at J + 60 milliseconds and lasting 1 minute or greater, using a two-channel Holter monitor. Only nicardipine significantly decreased the duration (3.2 +/- 1.2 min/h) and the area under the ST time curve (AUC; 5.7 +/- 15.7 AUC/h) of 1-mm or greater myocardial ischemic episodes compared with group C (17.2 +/- 5.6 min/h and 30.1 +/- 49 AUC/h, respectively) during the intraoperative postbypass period. A trend toward lower frequency, duration, and area under the ST time curve of myocardial ischemic episodes was observed in group NIC compared with group NTG. Cardiac indices and mixed venous oxygen saturations were significantly greater, whereas systemic pressures were less in group NIC compared with group NTG for the same period. These results suggest that nicardipine, but not nitroglycerin, decreased the duration and area under the ST time curve of myocardial ischemic episodes shortly after coronary revascularization. Larger studies are required to verify the efficacy of nicardipine in reducing the severity of myocardial ischemia during cardiac surgery.

Antiischemic effects of nicardipine and nitroglycerin after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficacy of a continuous infusion of nicardipine and nitroglycerin in reducing the incidence and severity of perioperative myocardial ischemia during elective coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

METHODS

Patients received either nicardipine infusion (0.7 to 1.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); n = 30) or nitroglycerin (0.5 to 1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); n = 30) or neither medication (n = 17) after aortic occlusion clamp release and for 24 hours postoperatively. Myocardial ischemic episodes (MIE) were considered to have occurred with ST-segment depressions or elevations of at least 1 mm and at least 2 mm (for both depressions or elevations), each at J + 60 ms and lasting at least 1 minute, using a two-channel Holter monitor.

RESULTS

Only nicardipine significantly decreased the duration (p = 0.02) of the 1-mm or greater minutes per hour (3.2 +/- 1.2 minutes per hour) and eliminated the number (p = 0.02) of the 2-mm or greater minutes per hour (zero minutes per hour) when compared with control patients (17.2 +/- 5.6 minutes per hour and 0.17 minutes per hour, respectively) during the intraoperative postbypass period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that nicardipine lessened the severity of myocardial ischemia shortly after coronary revascularization and could be considered as an alternative to standard antiischemic therapy.

Comparison of perioperative myocardial protection with nifedipine versus nifedipine and metoprolol in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting

A randomized study was performed on 70 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass grafting to examine whether the combined infusion of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (10 micrograms/kg per hour) and the beta 1-blocker metopropol (12 micrograms/kg per hour, n = 34) reduces the prevalence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias. The control group received nifedipine alone (n = 36). In both groups the infusion was started from the onset of extracorporal circulation and maintained over a period of 24 hours. Repeated 12-lead electrocardiographic and 3-channel Holter monitor recordings for 48 hours were used to define perioperative myocardial ischemia (transient ischemic event, myocardial infarction) and arrhythmias (sinus tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter/fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia). Hemodynamic parameters were repeatedly assessed for 24 hours and serum enzyme levels (creatine kinase, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase) for up to 36 hours after the operation. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to preoperative anamnestic and surgical data. No signs of perioperative myocardial infarction were detected in either group. However, a significantly lower incidence of transient ischemic episodes was observed in the nifedipine-metoprolol group than in the nifedipine group (3% vs 11%; p < 0.05). In addition, there was a tendency toward lower creatine kinase MB levels and peak values of creatine kinase and creatine kinase MB in the nifedipine-metoprolol group. With regard to perioperative arrhythmias, there was a significantly lower incidence of sinus tachycardia and atrial flutter/fibrillation in the nifedipine-metoprolol group (9% and 6%) than in the nifedipine group (33% and 27%, p < 0.05). In addition, postoperative heart rate was lower in the nifedipine-metoprolol group starting from the sixth hour after release of the aortic crossclamp (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). No other hemodynamic parameters showed significant differences between the two groups and all returned to preoperative levels within 24 hours. In conclusion, perioperative application of nifedipine and metoprolol in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass grafting reduces the prevalence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias without significant negative inotropic effects. The combined infusion of the two drugs appears superior to nifedipine alone in preventing perioperative myocardial ischemia and reducing reperfusion-induced arrhythmias.

Comparison of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and atenolol on antianginal efficacies and exercise hemodynamic responses in stable angina pectoris

A gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) of nifedipine has been developed to provide a once-daily dosing, and predictable, relatively constant plasma concentrations. This study compared the antianginal efficacy of nifedipine GITS with a once-a-day beta-receptor blocker, atenolol. Seventeen patients with documented coronary artery disease and stable stress-induced angina pectoris were studied during a 2-week, single-blind, placebo baseline phase and a 12-week randomized, double-blind, active drug crossover efficacy phase, using the bicycle exercise test and ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. Patients exercised significantly longer with nifedipine GITS (883 +/- 47 seconds) and atenolol (908 +/- 44 seconds) than with placebo (794 +/- 41 seconds). Nifedipine GITS reduced systolic blood pressure at all stages of exercise compared with placebo but, because heart rate tended to increase more during nifedipine therapy, there was no difference in rate-pressure products between the placebo and nifedipine GITS periods. In contrast, atenolol reduced heart rate, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product during exercise compared with placebo. Whereas left ventricular ejection fractions (by radionuclide angiocardiography) increased with exercise, the maximal increase was smaller with atenolol than with placebo and nifedipine. The net increase in left ventricular ejection fraction at the end of exercise was greater with nifedipine than with placebo or atenolol. Ambulatory electrocardiograms showed only a small number of ischemic events. Neither nifedipine GITS nor atenolol reduced the number of ischemic events or total duration of ST-segment deviations significantly. It is concluded that nifedipine GITS is as effective an antianginal agent as atenolol, but the hemodynamic effects of the 2 agents differ.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intravenous nifedipine for prevention of myocardial ischaemia after coronary revascularization

We sought to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of a continuous infusion of nifedipine given for prevention of myocardial ischaemia following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients scheduled for elective CABG, who had good left ventricular function, were included. Only normotensive patients who did not require treatment with vasoactive drugs and were bleeding less than 100 ml.hr-1 following surgery were included. The patients were randomly distributed into two groups: a control group not receiving any treatment and a treated group receiving a bolus (3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 5 min) and maintenance (0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) infusion of nifedipine, starting upon arrival in the recovery room and continuing for four hours. Patients given nifedipine were compared with control patients in order to determine the effects of nifedipine on haemodynamic function and on the postoperative incidence of hypotension, hypertension, myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Continuous 2-lead Holter monitoring was used to detect myocardial ischaemia. Infarction was diagnosed by 12-lead ECGs and by assessment of the MB-isoenzyme creatine kinase. The infusion of nifedipine rapidly achieved and maintained plasma concentrations between 30 and 40 ng.ml-1. The pharmacokinetic studies revealed a systemic clearance of nifedipine of 0.371 +/- 0.101 L.hr-1.kg-1, an apparent volume of distribution of 0.764 +/- 0.288 L.kg-1 and an elimination half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.6 hr. No correlation was found between plasma concentration of nifedipine and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The incidence of postoperative hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg) and hypertension (MAP > 100 mmHg) was comparable between the groups. All haemodynamic variables were similar in both groups during the study period. Of 23 patients who received nifedipine, none showed evidence of ischaemia within six hours of starting the infusion. During the same period, five of 24 patients in the control group had ST-segment deviation suggestive of myocardial ischaemia (P = 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Three patients in the control group and none in the nifedipine group suffered perioperative myocardial infarction (P = NS). In conclusion, the continuous infusion of nifedipine used in this study is safe and reduces the incidence of myocardial ischaemia in normotensive patients with good left ventricular function following CABG. Further studies of larger number of patients are required to determine the role of calcium entry blockers following coronary artery surgery.

Attenuation of circadian variation by combined antianginal therapy with suppression of morning and evening increases in transient myocardial ischemia

The circadian variation of total ischemic activity was examined during 3289 hours of ambulatory ECG monitoring in 101 patients with stable angina pectoris and proved coronary artery disease, who were not receiving any prophylactic antianginal therapy. The 101 patients displayed 411 episodes of ischemia, 312 (76%) of which were silent; a circadian rhythm was noted for the occurrence of total and silent ischemia. Thirty-eight percent of the ischemic episodes occurred between 6 AM and 12 noon, and total and silent ischemia were significantly more frequent during this period compared with the other three 6-hour periods (p less than 0.01); a lesser peak was noted in the evening. The effects of metoprolol and combined therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine on the circadian variation of ischemic activity were studied in two subgroups of patients in a random, double-blind study design (31 patients receiving metoprolol and 42 receiving combined therapy). During therapy with metoprolol the morning increase in ischemic activity was attenuated, and the highest frequency of ischemia was then noted in the evening (6 AM to 12 noon compared with 6 PM to 12 midnight; p less than 0.05). Combined therapy abolished the morning peak as did metoprolol monotherapy, but even the evening increase in ischemic activity was attenuated (p less than 0.05). The diurnal distribution of the mean heart rate at the onset of ischemia, when patients were off therapy, showed a morning increase similar to the increase in ischemic activity but no second peak in the evening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nifedipine reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and transient ischemia in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting

A randomized study was performed on 104 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting to examine whether the infusion of nifedipine (n = 53) reduces the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and necrosis in the early postoperative period. Continuous hemodynamic and three-channel Holter monitoring was performed for 24 hours and serial assessment of serum enzymes and 12-lead electrocardiography were performed for 36 hours postoperatively. Nifedipine (minimum dose, 10 micrograms/kg/hr for 24 hours) was applied from the onset of extracorporal circulation. The control group (n = 51) received nitroglycerin (minimum dose, 1 micrograms/kg/min for 24 hours). Using the combined analyses of electrocardiography and Holter recordings, myocardial ischemia was defined as being either a transient ischemic event (TIE), transient coronary spasm (TCS), or myocardial infarction (MI). The two groups did not differ with respect to preoperative New York Heart Association classification, age, history of myocardial infarction, extracorporal circulation and aortic cross-clamp time, number of distal anastomoses, or systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics. The incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia was substantially lower in the nifedipine than in the nitroglycerin group [TIE: three of 53 patients (6%) versus nine of 50 patients (18%), p less than 0.001; MI: two of 53 patients (4%) versus six of 50 patients (12%), p less than 0.001; and TCS: none of 53 patients (0%) versus two of 50 patients (4%), p = NS].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Myocardial metabolic and hemodynamic effects of a sustained intravenous infusion of nifedipine with and without metoprolol in patients with unstable angina

We tested the usefulness of a sustained intravenous infusion of nifedipine and a combination of nifedipine and metoprolol in the early management of 14 patients with unstable angina pectoris. After a 24-hour run-in period, nifedipine was titrated in a stepwise fashion (mean dose 27 +/- 7 micrograms/min). After nifedipine treatment coronary blood flow increased from 150 +/- 66 to 183 +/- 74 ml/min (p less than 0.05), whereas double product, myocardial oxygen consumption, and both arterial and coronary sinus (nor)epinephrine levels were unchanged. Myocardial lactate uptake increased from 3.4 +/- 26.1 to 31.3 +/- 26.6 mumol/min (p less than 0.005) and free fatty acid uptake from 7.2 +/- 22.1 to 34.5 +/- 33.7 mumol/min (p less than 0.05). A small nonsignificant improvement in amino acid metabolism was observed. Metoprolol was added in seven patients and led to a decrease in double product (-2.2 +/- 1.6 x 10(3); p less than 0.01) and myocardial oxygen consumption (-3.2 +/- 3.8 ml/min; p less than 0.05). The lactate uptake/oxygen uptake ratio increased by 18% after metoprolol (p = NS). The number of episodes of chest pain decreased from 2.4 +/- 1.1/24 hours to 0.1 +/- 0.2 in the nifedipine group and from 2.9 +/- 1.1/24 hours to 0.3 +/- 0.5 in the nifedipine plus metoprolol group (both p less than 0.01). We conclude that in the acute phase of unstable angina, intravenous nifedipine can be carefully titrated to improve coronary blood flow and oxidative metabolism. The addition of metoprolol is also associated with a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand. This treatment results in significant hemodynamic stability.

Intravenous nifedipine prevents ergonovine-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with stable effort angina

Twelve of 40 consecutive patients with effort angina, documented coronary artery disease, and a positive exercise stress test had a positive ergonovine test. ST-segment depression (0.1 mV) occurred in ten and ST elevation (0.1 mV) in two patients. During the ergonovine maleate test the rate-pressure product recorded at the onset of ischemia (ST greater than or equal to 0.1 mV) was significantly lower than that recorded during the exercise stress test. The reproducibility of the rate-pressure product at ischemia was displayed in every patient with a second test; then, a third test after intravenous nifedipine infusion (1 mg over 5 minutes + 1 mg over 55 minutes) was performed. Six patients had negative results; out of the remaining six, three exhibited a significant increase in the dosage required for provoking ischemia. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were reduced by nifedipine, while only a slight increase in heart rate occurred, so that the rate-pressure product at any ergonovine dosage was decreased by nifedipine. No differences in the ischemic threshold during exercise and during the ergonovine maleate tests (in washout and after nifedipine) were found in patients with a positive or negative response to nifedipine. The ergonovine test was positive in a sizable (30%) number of patients with stable effort angina. In these patients nifedipine was effective in preventing ergonovine-induced myocardial ischemia.

Negative inotropic effect of intravenous nifedipine in coronary artery disease: relation to plasma levels

The relative extent of the vasodilator versus direct negative inotropic effects of nifedipine was studied in 15 male patients with documented coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function. At the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterization, three groups of five patients received dose of 1, 2, and 3 mg intravenous nifedipine at a rate of 0.33 mg/min. Hemodynamic measurements and blood collections were made before, during, and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes after infusion of nifedipine. Heart rate increased and mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after the 2 and 3 mg doses of nifedipine. Systemic vascular resistance was significantly decreased and cardiac index increased after all doses of nifedipine. Maximal left ventricular dp/dt (dp/dtmax) was significantly decreased after the 3 mg infusion. The reduction in dp/dtmax was most consistent with a reduction in left ventricular contractility as opposed to changes in loading conditions. Plasma concentrations of nifedipine were significantly correlated with bidirectional changes in dp/dtmax (r = 0.86). Nifedipine concentrations below 28.2 ng/ml were associated with a rise in dp/dtmax, whereas concentrations above that level were associated with a reduction in dp/dtmax. These data indicate that intravenous nifedipine produces dose- and concentration-dependent depression of myocardial contractility in patients with coronary artery disease. Nifedipine concentrations associated with negative inotropic effects are readily achievable with common oral and sublingual doses.

Vasodilatory effects of nisoldipine on coronary arteries--correlation with plasma levels

Vasomotion of angiographically normal and stenotic epicardial coronary arteries was analyzed up to 15 minutes after the onset of an intravenous infusion (4 minutes) of 0.5 mg (13 patients, group A) or 1 mg nisoldipine (13 patients, group B). After both doses the maximal increase of the mean diameters of normal coronary segments was achieved not before the 15th minute, averaging 11 +/- 6% in group A (p less than 0.001) and 18 +/- 9% in group B (p less than 0.001). Eleven of 15 and 8 of 9 coronary stenoses in groups A and B dilated to 5-80% and 15-70%, respectively. The nisoldipine concentration reached maximal levels at the end of the infusion (fourth minute) with an average of 8 +/- 4 ng/ml and 17 +/- 7 ng/ml in groups A and B, respectively. A significant correlation between nisoldipine plasma levels and dilation of normal coronary segments was obtained only with the individual maxima of these parameters and only in group A (p less than 0.01). The hysteresis of the coronary dilation in relation to the drug plasma levels may be due to the high receptor affinity of nisoldipine. In either group nisoldipine provoked a persistent increase in coronary sinus oxygen saturation (p less than 0.01) and a substantial and prolonged drop in systolic and diastolic aortic pressure (p less than 0.001). Both doses of nisoldipine induced a rise in heart rate (p less than 0.01) and a slight drop in the rate-pressure product (p less than 0.05).

Infusion of nifedipine after coronary artery bypass grafting decreases the incidence of early postoperative myocardial ischemia

We performed a randomized study on patients undergoing elective coronary bypass grafting to examine whether postoperative infusion of nifedipine (n = 25) could reduce the incidence of isolated transient myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, or both. The control group (n = 25) received nitroglycerin. Hemodynamic and Holter monitoring and serial assessment of enzymatic and electrocardiographic changes were performed for all patients. Both groups showed comparable preoperative and operative data. The incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the nifedipine group (n = 1) as compared with the control group (n = 4), whereas the number of patients with isolated transient myocardial ischemia was similar in both groups (nifedipine, 3; control, 4). At the time of peak activity, levels of creatine kinase (350 +/- 129 versus 511 +/- 287 IU/mL), creatine kinase-MB (8.4 +/- 5.4 versus 17.1 +/- 11.0 IU/mL), and glutamate-oxaloacetate-transaminase (30.4 +/- 4.4 versus 41.0 +/- 7.9 IU/mL) were markedly lower in the nifedipine group (p less than 0.05). We conclude that infusion of nifedipine after elective coronary artery bypass grafting effectively decreases the incidence of myocardial infarction and the extent of myocardial necrosis during the early postoperative period.

Effects of intravenous and intracoronary nicardipine

The systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of nicardipine, a calcium antagonist, were studied in 30 patients. Increased coronary blood flow (from 102 +/- 9 to 147 +/- 13 ml/min; p less than 0.001), heart rate (from 69 +/- 3 to 81 +/- 3 beats/min; p less than 0.001), stroke volume (108 +/- 6 to 123 +/- 6 ml; p less than 0.001) and cardiac output (from 7.3 +/- 0.5 to 9.9 +/- 0.5 liters/min; p less than 0.001) were demonstrated in 15 patients administered intravenous nicardipine (2 mg bolus given over 1 minute, followed by infusion of 50 micrograms/min to maintain 10 to 20 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure). Systemic vascular resistance decreased (from 1,183 +/- 70 to 733 +/- 33 dynes s cm-5) as did coronary resistance (from 1.47 +/- 0.1 to 0.7 +/- 0.1 mm Hg/ml/min; p less than 0.001). Other hemodynamic parameters such as left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, stroke volume and work, aortic blood flow and acceleration, ejection and external power, myocardial oxygen consumption and time constant for left ventricular isovolumic relaxation also were evaluated. To distinguish between direct myocardial effects of nicardipine and peripheral effects, 15 patients were given intracoronary nicardipine (0.1 or 0.2 mg) during cardiac catheterization. Nicardipine produced slight depression of left ventricular contractile function and impairment of left ventricular relaxation; but these changes were mild and transient compared with the marked and sustained increase in coronary blood flow that persisted 7 minutes after administration. Thus, nicardipine is a relatively selective vasodilator with minimal direct myocardial depressant activity n humans.

Effects of nifedipine on left ventricular distensibility, relaxation and filling dynamics during pacing-induced myocardial ischemia

Diastolic left ventricular properties were assessed in 8 patients with coronary artery disease at rest and during postpacing states before and after nifedipine (10 mg sublingually). Typical anginal pain developed in all patients during pacing tachycardia before but not after nifedipine. Postpacing increases in end-diastolic pressure (10 +/- 5 [mean +/- standard deviation] to 23 +/- 9 mm Hg) and volume (99 +/- 29 to 113 +/- 27 ml) were greatly attenuated with nifedipine (13 +/- 7 and 97 +/- 22 ml, respectively). These responses were associated with normalization of postpacing shifts of the ventricular diastolic pressure-volume curve upward or more to the right. The time constant of ventricular relaxation was prolonged by pacing tachycardia (44 +/- 10 to 62 +/- 5 ms) and was reduced to the control level in postpacing beats after nifedipine. The peak rate of early ventricular filling was affected neither by pacing stress nor by nifedipine. When regional myocardial function was expressed by a radial coordinate system, the nonischemic segment responded to the control pacing with an increase in end-diastolic length and comparable augmentation of the stroke excursion, while the ischemic segment showed a marked reduction in stroke excursion with end-diastolic length unchanged. Thus, the diastolic pressure-length relation moved up to the higher portion of the single curve in the nonischemic segment, while it shifted directly upward in the ischemic segment. These responses were markedly attenuated with nifedipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of antianginal efficacies and exercise hemodynamic effects of nifedipine and diltiazem in stable angina pectoris

The antianginal efficacies of nifedipine (40 to 120 mg/day) and diltiazem (120 to 360 mg/day) were studied in 21 normotensive patients with chronic stable angina pectoris, using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Patients received each agent titrated to maximum tolerated doses for 6 weeks, after a 2-week placebo baseline period. The maximum tolerated dose for nifedipine was 72 +/- 8 (standard error) mg/day and for diltiazem 297 +/- 20 mg/day. Two patients discontinued nifedipine early because of side effects. Duration of symptom-limited treadmill exercise was longer during the nifedipine (556 +/- 43 seconds) and diltiazem periods (546 +/- 39 seconds) compared with placebo baseline (474 +/- 41 seconds, p less than 0.02). Compared with placebo, nifedipine caused a significant increase in heart rate both at rest standing and at peak exercise. Nifedipine decreased resting systolic blood pressure but had no effect at peak exercise. In contrast, diltiazem caused a significant decrease in heart rate at rest but had no effect on blood pressure at rest or at peak exercise. Thus, nifedipine and diltiazem have differential effects on heart rate and systolic blood pressure suggesting different modes of action. However, despite the increase in exercise duration, neither nifedipine nor diltiazem increased the heart rate-systolic pressure product during maximum exercise. This suggests that the antianginal effects of the 2 agents probably are mediated via reduction of myocardial oxygen demand at submaximal exercise. In addition, diltiazem appears to be better tolerated than nifedipine.

The role of nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium antagonists in stable angina pectoris

Numerous controlled studies have shown that nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium antagonists are effective in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and hemodynamic effects of these agents are different, and thus combination therapy offers additive improvement and also counterbalancing of the undesirable side effects of each drug. The choice of therapy depends on the severity of symptoms, associated diseases, compliance, side effects, and status of left ventricular function. The main mechanism of improvement is a decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption, though an increase in coronary blood flow is another potential reason for the use of calcium blockers. This review considers the properties of these drugs, their mechanism of action, and the results of randomized studies.

Role of calcium channel blockers in experimental exercise-induced ischemia

Calcium channel blockers, which induce vasodilation by relaxing vascular smooth muscle cells, have proven effective in the treatment of angina pectoris. To study mechanisms of calcium blockade in ischemic heart disease, conscious chronically instrumented dogs with a single coronary artery ameroid constrictor were studied during steady-state treadmill runs which induced regional myocardial ischemia. During exercise-induced ischemia, regional systolic wall thickening and subendocardial blood flow were both significantly reduced in the ischemic zone. Calcium channel blockade with verapamil, diltiazem, or nifedipine enhanced regional systolic wall thickening. Regional subendocardial blood flow in the ischemic region, measured during diltiazem and nifedipine experiments, improved during exercise. Reduced coronary artery resistance in the native vessels and/or recruitment of collaterals appears to largely explain the increased total myocardial blood supply in the jeopardized area and the increased function. However, after diltiazem, reduced exercise heart rates as well as reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure also contributed to the improvement in the oxygen-supply imbalance in the ischemic myocardium. These data provide a basis for understanding the efficacy of calcium channel blocker treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Total ischemic burden: effect of vasoactive agents

Treatment of the total ischemic burden is dependent on adequate documentation of both painful and painless episodes of myocardial ischemia, an understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved, and knowledge of prognosis for affected patients. Because a vasoconstrictive component appears to be an important element in the genesis of many episodes of myocardial ischemia, those vasoactive drugs that produce increased flow in the coronary circulation should be clinically useful. Nitrates and calcium blockers--especially nifedipine--have been found to be particularly valuable in this regard in both experimental and clinical trials.