Mechanisms and relevance of arrhythmias induced by high-current programmed ventricular stimulation

Programmed ventricular stimulation using tandem versus simple sequential protocols

The objective was to determine whether two commonly used ventricular stimulation protocols, one more complex than the other, produced concordant results. If such were the case, the simpler protocol would streamline activities in clinical electrophysiology laboratories.

BACKGROUND

Two programmed ventricular stimulation protocols were compared. (1) With the tandem method, the first extrastimulus (S2) is moved stepwise to the effective refractory period and then moved out 50 msec; the second extrastimulus (S3) is then decremented until it fails to capture; S2 and S3 are then decremented in a semialternating (tandem) fashion so that both continue to capture. When S2 reaches the refractory period + 10 msec and S3 fails to capture, S3 is then moved out 50 msec, and S4 is decremented as described for S3. (2) With the simple sequential method, the first extrastimulus (S2) is decremented stepwise to the refractory period, and then moved out 10 msec to assure capture; S3 is then similarly decremented to the refractory period and then moved out 10 msec; and S4 is then similarly decremented.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, crossover, consecutive series study. Both protocols were tested in each patient on the same day in randomized order.

RESULTS

There were 84 matched studies. Fifty-six patients provided data from baseline electrophysiological studies, and 28 of these provided additional data during drug trials. There was a 93% concordance between the two methods, including the primary outcomes of inducibility of clinical arrhythmias, inducibility of nonclinical arrhythmias, and noninducibility (P < 0.001). Discordances were few and evenly distributed between the two protocols (P = NS). Results were similar for baseline studies and drug trials. The simple sequential method required less time to perform (P < or = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Tandem and simple sequential protocols provide concordant results. No advantage could be demonstrated for the more complex tandem method.

Programmed electrical stimulation protocols: variations on a theme

A series of prospective protocols were designed to determine the yield ratio (true positives vs. false positives = nonclinical) in various patient groups using a variety of programmed electrical stimulation (PES) variables. First, a PES protocol was used in 772 patients. Single, double, and triple extrastimuli were delivered in sequence (leaving each successive extrastimulus just beyond its refractory period before moving to the next extrastimulus) during sinus rhythm and two ventricular paced rates at the RV apex, before moving to the outflow tract and repeating the sequence and then moving on to isoproterenol infusion with the PES sequence repeated at the apex. This protocol met NASPE standards for induction of VT in patients with coronary artery disease and a history of VT, while failing to induce monomorphic VT in any control patient. The best yield ratios combined with the greatest likelihood of inducing clinical tachycardia were achieved with sinus rhythm and three extrastimuli, and pacing at the lower rate and three extrastimuli. Pacing at the faster rate and triple extrastimuli was highly inductive of clinical arrhythmias, but had a low yield ratio due to induction of more nonclinical arrhythmias than other steps. The next protocol was performed in 61 patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia. In each case, the protocol described above was completed at the RV apex, even if tachycardia was also induced at an earlier point in the protocol. This allowed for more accurate yield ratios to be established for each step in the protocol, since each patient was exposed to each of these steps.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of high-current stimulation in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia rendered noninducible by antiarrhythmic drugs

Successful antiarrhythmic drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is presumed to be related to effects on myocardium within the re-entrant circuit. To test the hypothesis that prevention of VT induction may be related to effects on myocardium other than that directly involved in the tachycardia circuit, high-current stimulation was used to achieve shorter coupling intervals in 22 patients with sustained uniform VT that was rendered noninducible by antiarrhythmic agents during stimulation at twice threshold. Sustained uniform VT was induced in 10 patients in response to high-current stimulation (group 1), including 4 tachycardias with the same morphology observed in the baseline study. There were no inducible arrhythmias in 12 patients (group 2). Patients were receiving several different antiarrhythmic regimens, but there was no particular drug associated with the induction of VT using high-current stimulation. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in baseline VT cycle length (247 +/- 41 vs 253 +/- 44 ms), drug-induced increase in effective refractory period (20 +/- 15 vs 16 +/- 7%), QRS duration (25 +/- 10 vs 20 +/- 17%) or maximal current strength delivered (10.9 +/- 5.3 vs 9.3 +/- 4.0 mA). There was no significant difference in local activation with high-current stimulation between groups 1 and 2. In conclusion, sustained uniform VT was induced in 45% (10 of 22) of patients whose arrhythmias were rendered noninducible by antiarrhythmic agents during programmed stimulation at twice threshold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Programmed electrical stimulation of the ventricle: an efficient, sensitive, and specific protocol

A relatively simple and efficient ventricular programmed electrical stimulation (PES) protocol was developed, capable of achieving high degrees of sensitivity and specificity. In a series of 481 subjects, 1, 2, and 3 extrastimuli (ES) were used successively during sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing at two drive cycle lengths, at one or more ventricular sites, together with rapid ventricular pacing, and other maneuvers such as isoproterenol infusion. Three ES were used immediately after two ES at each drive rate, rather than returning after completion of the protocol with two ES. Using the protocol, appropriate arrhythmias could be induced in 88% of all patients with ventricular fibrillation, 84% of all patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (91% with underlying coronary disease), and 58% of patients with severe nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. There were significant differences in inducibility between patients whose ventricular arrhythmias were due to coronary artery disease and other causes. In contrast, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (all ventricular fibrillation) could be induced in only 5% of a control group of control patients, for a specificity of 95%. The protocol described is simpler and more efficient than those that use exhaustive testing of two ES before going to three ES. Three ES during sinus rhythm proved to be the most productive step, with a higher yield ratio (true: false-positives) than two ES or three ES during pacing, especially at faster rates. Greater efficiency is also achieved by leaving the timing of an extrastimulus just beyond its effective refractory period when an additional extrastimulus is to be added, compared to protocols in which the extrastimulus is moved later in the cycle and then decremented in tandem with the additional extrastimulus. Coupling intervals less than 200 msec produced some false-positives, but fewer overall than intervals greater than or equal to 200 msec, and with yield ratios comparable to other protocol steps. The protocol described meets NASPE standards for ventricular programmed stimulation protocols, and with its demonstrated specificity and relative simplicity and efficiency may be useful as a model for groups not yet committed to an alternative protocol.

Effect of pacing current strength on indexes of myocardial activation in humans: influence of chronic infarction and polarity of pacing

The effects of current strength (threshold to 20 mA) and pacing polarity (bipolar versus unipolar) on indexes of ventricular activation during endocardial pacing (cycle length 400 to 500 ms) from 10 normal and 17 abnormal left ventricular sites were assessed in 19 patients. Abnormal sites were infarcted and demonstrated an electrogram duration greater than 70 ms and amplitude less than 3 mV during sinus rhythm. Bipolar pacing was performed from poles 1 (cathode) and 3 (1 cm interelectrode distance) of a quadripolar catheter. Unipolar cathodal pacing was performed from the tip electrode (pole 1). Local activation was indexed by the interval from the pacing stimulus to 1) the onset of the QRS complex, 2) the largest rapid deflection of the local electrogram, and 3) the end (total duration) of the local electrogram recorded from poles 2 and 4 of the quadripolar catheter used for left ventricular pacing. Distant activation was indexed by the interval from pacing stimulus to electrograms recorded at the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. Bipolar and unipolar pacing of normal sites produced a modest homogeneous reduction of all activation times by 3 to 11 ms (median) with increments in current strength from threshold (0.8 mA) to 20 mA. Bipolar pacing of abnormal sites showed marked (up to 110 ms) and heterogeneous changes in local (median 22 to 30 ms) as well as distant (median 14 to 23 ms) activation times with increases in current strength from threshold (2.7 mA) to 20 mA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Strength-interval relation for ventricular functional refractoriness

Successful initiation and termination of presumed reentrant ventricular tachycardia frequently depends on the ability to deliver closely coupled impulses to the region of the tachycardia origin. To evaluate systematically the relative influence of local latency and large-scale conduction delay in limiting the delivery of closely coupled impulses, the strength-interval relation of the effective refractory period (RP), and the local and remote functional RP in 35 patients at paced cycle length of 500 ms were measured. The pacing threshold was less than or equal to 0.25 mA in all patients. The drive-train (S1) and the extrastimulus (S2) were applied from the same site, the right ventricular (RV) apex, in 25 patients, and from separate sites (RV apex and RV outflow tract) in 10 patients. The effect of procainamide (plasma concentration 10.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/ml) on the strength-interval relations in 10 patients was also assessed. Although effective RP decreased significantly with each successive increase in current strength (p less than 0.001), local functional RP decreased only up to current strength of 4 mA, and remote functional RP decreased only up to 2 mA. Procainamide shifted the effective RP and local and remote functional RP strength-interval curves uniformly to the right without altering their relation. These data indicate that large-scale conduction delay provides the principal limitation for using increasing current strengths of a single extrastimulus to initiate or terminate ventricular tachycardia.

Induction of ventricular arrhythmias by programmed ventricular stimulation: a prospective study on the effects of stimulation current on arrhythmia induction

A protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation is described in which the effect of increasing stimulation current on ventricular refractoriness and arrhythmia induction was specifically examined. The protocol was evaluated prospectively in 70 patients undergoing electrophysiological study for documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias. Programmed electrical stimulation was performed at the right ventricular apex and outflow tract using single and double extrastimuli and burst pacing. Stimulation currents of 2, 5, 10, and 20 mA were used in ascending order. The initial (lowest) current was never less than twice diastolic threshold and was maintained during each stimulation run until refractoriness was reached. The current was then increased to the next level to facilitate premature capture until refractoriness was encountered at 20 mA or a sustained arrhythmia occurred. Ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 34 patients, 31 of whom had presented with a sustained ventricular arrhythmia. The incidence of induced arrhythmias was low in those patients who had presented with symptoms alone, a non-sustained arrhythmia, or a sustained arrhythmia in association with a predisposing clinical event. Only one patient with a negative result had further ventricular arrhythmias during the mean follow up period of 15 months. Although each increase in stimulation current caused a decrease in measured ventricular refractoriness, this resulted in only four arrhythmias. Only one arrhythmia was induced above 5 mA. These results suggest that this simple protocol using two extrastimuli and a single stimulation current of 5 mA will reliably identify most patients who have symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.

Summation and inhibition by ultrarapid train pacing in the human ventricle

Trains of ultrarapid stimuli that begin late in the refractory period have been reported both to produce early single captures to terminate tachyarrhythmias and to inhibit the response to subsequent threshold stimuli. To determine which characteristics of trains facilitate capture and which enhance inhibition, we compared the right ventricular strength interval relationship for single extrastimuli (S2) with that for 100 Hz trains with a duration of 100 msec in 29 patients. Pulse frequency was varied in 12 patients (50, 100, and 200 Hz) and train duration (50, 100, and 150 msec) was varied in 11 patients; the effect of procainamide (10.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/ml) was assessed in 10 patients. Relative to S2, 100 Hz trains with a duration of 100 msec prolonged the effective refractory period (ERP) at low current strength (inhibition), but shortened the ERP at high-current strength (summation): at 0.5 mA, the train ERP was 47 +/- 6 (SEM) msec longer than the S2 ERP (p less than .001); at 16 mA it was 12 +/- 1 msec shorter (p less than .001). Trains prolonged the functional refractory period (FRP) slightly at low currents (13 +/- 3 msec, p = .001 at .05 mA), but did not shorten FRP significantly at high currents (2 +/- 2 msec, p = NS at 16 mA) because of increased stimulus-response latency. Inhibition increased with increasing pulse frequency (p less than .001), increasing train duration (p less than .001), and procainamide (p less than .01). Summation increased with increasing pulse frequency (p less than .001), but not increasing train duration or procainamide, suggesting that inhibition and summation depend on different electrophysiologic mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrophysiologic study in the management of cardiac arrest survivors: a critical review

This review discusses the value and limitations of EPS in the management of cardiac arrest survivors. Uncertainties associated with EPS include a lack of consensus with respect to stimulation protocol, end points for VT suppression during drug testing, significance of induced polymorphic VT or VF, and timing of EPS after myocardial infarction. Despite methodologic shortcomings in most clinical studies, a useful body of knowledge has emerged. In cardiac arrest survivors, incidence of inducible sustained VT ranged from 35% to 75%. Where induced VT (sustained or nonsustained) was successfully suppressed, recurrent arrhythmic events occurred in 0% to 33% of patients over a 1- to 5-year follow-up period. Failed regimens correlated with a high risk of arrhythmic recurrence. EPS also helps to select patients for the implantable defibrillator or electrocardiac surgery. In conclusion, EPS appears empirically useful in the management of cardiac arrest survivors with coronary artery disease; its value in other disease entities is uncertain.