Role of nitrates in silent myocardial ischemia

Time significance of acute thrombotic reactant markers in patients with and without silent myocardial ischemia and overt unstable angina pectoris

Ischemic electrocardiographic changes were recorded within 2 hours of admission using a 12-lead electrocardiographic continuous monitor with a 20-second scanning interval and an alarm mode for asymptomatic events. Blood samples were obtained at admission and at the moment of asymptomatic events (group A). In the other patients who did not develop ischemia, a second blood sample was taken 12 hours later (group B). We determined prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, clotting factor VIII activity, tissue plasminogen activator activity, tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, cross-linked fibrin degradation product, and thrombin-antithrombin III complexes. There was a statistically significant difference between group A and B patients when the basal samples were analyzed for thrombin-antithrombin III (p = 0.046) and d-Dimer (p = 0.005). Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 were significantly reduced, and d-Dimer was elevated when basal blood samples were compared with the second sample in patients who developed silent events (p = 0.008 and 0.055, respectively). A plasma concentration of thrombin-antithrombin III complex was also significantly decreased when sample 2 was compared with the basal blood sample (p = 0.039). Five recurrent episodes of angina and 2 nonfatal infarctions occurred, and 4 urgent revascularization procedures were performed in group A. In group B, there was only 1 nonfatal infarction (p = 0.01). The results of the present study suggest that a time-dependent thrombotic process is detectable in the blood stream as a cyclic movement. Further studies are needed to determine if some other factors, such as intensive shear stress in the vessel wall, may activate plaque instability during asymptomatic episodes.

Nitrates in silent ischemia

In recent years it has become clear that episodes of transient myocardial ischemia commonly occur in patients with coronary artery disease in the absence of chest pain or angina equivalent. These episodes of "silent myocardial ischemia" are particularly well documented during continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in daily life. Evidence suggests that these episodes represent true ischemia, and appear to be a marker of unfavorable outcome. While the pathophysiology is not completely understood, it appears as though the mechanisms of angina and silent ischemia are the same. Both forms of ischemia respond to conventional antianginal medication. While long-acting nitrates are effective in reducing or preventing myocardial ischemia, because of their propensity to cause tolerance they should be used intermittently and in association with either beta-blockers or calcium antagonists. Nitrates are safe and comparatively inexpensive, and will continue to play an important role in the treatment and prevention of angina. However, in the light of current knowledge, there is no specific indication for the treatment of silent ischemia by nitrates.

Use of nitrates in ischemic heart disease

The organic nitrates have remarkably diverse actions that are or should be beneficial in patients with ischemic heart disease. These drugs are effective in all the important ischemic syndromes. Preliminary data in patients with acute infarction suggest that the drugs may be truly cardioprotective, resulting in improved mortality. This review has not discussed the role of nitrates in congestive heart failure or LV dysfunction, a subject of great importance. The nitrates are useful adjunctive agents in these syndromes, and the two VeHfT trials support the concept that long-term nitrate administration, in conjunction with hydralazine, may favorably alter the natural history of heart failure. This cardioprotective effect is similar to that suggested for the post-MI patient. The data are not strong enough for definitive conclusions at this time. The clinical benefits of nitrates in decreasing subjective (angina) and objective indices of ischemia in stable and unstable angina, as well as limited data in asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, are unequivocal and are as favorable as those for beta blockers or calcium antagonists. Tolerance is an important problem that unfavorably influences the potential benefits of nitrate therapy. I believe that this problem can be avoided with well-designed dosing regimens. Current research into endothelial biology in health and disease has further supported a physiologic role for the organic nitrates in patients with ischemic heart disease. The nitrate-platelet story, while controversial, is promising and offers another positive rationale for nitrate administration. The concept of nitrates replenishing disordered EDRF release or action is an exciting one. Physicians should feel fortunate to have such a remarkable group of drugs available for their patients.

Efficacy of a single dose of slow-release isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of silent or painful myocardial ischemia in stable angina pectoris

A double-blind study was performed in 32 patients with stable angina pectoris to assess the effects of slow-release isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) (a single dose of 120 mg/day) on the frequency and duration of painless and painful ischemic episodes, and on electrocardiographic changes and exercise tolerance. Forty-eight-hour electrocardiographic monitoring and treadmill exercise tests were performed before, and at 20 and 21 days of therapy. Holter monitoring showed a significant decrease in the frequency of painful and silent episodes (p less than 0.001), and in the duration of painful (1,623 +/- 664 seconds vs 323 +/- 161 seconds; p less than 0.001) and silent episodes (2,818 +/- 1,496 seconds vs 223 +/- 102 seconds; p less than 0.001). The magnitude of painful and silent ST-segment depression was significantly reduced (2.7 +/- 0.9 mm to 0.7 +/- 0.7 mm and 2.0 +/- 1.1 mm to 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively; p less than 0.001). Time of exercise testing to the onset of ST-segment depression (442 +/- 137 seconds vs 858 +/- 110 seconds; p less than 0.001) or anginal pain was doubled (461 +/- 128 seconds vs 830 +/- 130 seconds; p less than 0.001). The work load increased from 6 to 10 METs (p less than 0.001). ISDN in a single dose of 120 mg/day is a valuable drug for stable angina pectoris, decreasing the frequency of silent and painful ischemic episodes and the magnitude of ST-segment depressions, and increasing exercise tolerance. It particularly shortened the duration of silent episodes. For patients' compliance, a once-daily dose of ISDN could be advantageous.

Buccal versus intravenous nitroglycerin in unstable angina pectoris

The clinical syndrome of unstable angina includes patients with the first onset of angina, change in a previous stable pattern or the development of chest pain at rest. Administration of intravenous nitroglycerin is established therapy in unstable angina. Buccal nitroglycerin has been introduced as an alternative means of administering nitroglycerin, which provides relief of anginal pain within 2 to 3 min and a sustained effect for 3 to 5 h. Twenty-nine patients admitted to the coronary care unit due to unstable angina were randomized to receive treatment with nitroglycerin i.v. for 24 h or buccal nitroglycerin every 4 h. Therapy was titrated according to haemodynamic effects. The mean dose of buccal nitroglycerin was 4.42 mg versus 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 in the intravenous group. The efficacy of treatment was similar in the two groups. Buccal nitroglycerin appeared to cause fewer adverse effects, especially less haemodynamic intolerance and headache, although the differences were not significant. Repeated administration of buccal nitroglycerin appears to be a safe and well tolerated alternative to high-dose i.v. nitroglycerin treatment in unstable angina pectoris.

Long-term efficacy of nitroglycerin patch in stable angina pectoris

Subchronic and chronic efficacy of a 10 mg of nitroglycerin (NTG) patch was studied in 30 patients with stable angina pectoris. The trial consisted of 2 periods of study: 1 period of 2 months with a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design and a second period of open treatment with verum patch. Two 7-day washout periods were performed at entry and at the end of the study. Efficacy was evaluated by clinical assessment of anginal attacks and NTG consumption and by means of multistage treadmill exercise testing. Exercise tests were performed at time 0 (24 hours from application of last patch), at 4 and 12 hours after dosing at the end of first 7-day washout, at the end of the first month of treatment, at the end of the second month of treatment after crossover, at the end of 3 months of treatment with active patch and at the end of the second 7-day washout period. Statistics were obtained by multivariate analysis of difference. In 27 patients whose records were available for final analysis the daily attacks of angina and NTG consumption decreased significantly during both the subchronic and chronic phases of the trial compared with placebo (p less than 0.001). Subchronic study showed significant improvement of maximal exercise duration, time to onset of angina, time to ST-segment depression of 1.0 mm, time to regression of angina and time to regression of ST depression, compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nitrates: why and how should they be used today? Current status of the clinical usefulness of nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate and isosorbide-5-mononitrate

Nitrates are highly effective both in terminating acute attacks of angina pectoris and in the prophylaxis of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. Preload reduction by venodilatation is the prevailing mechanism of nitrates in patients with chronic stable angina and is the unique feature distinguishing them from beta and calcium-channel blockers. Nitrates dilate coronary arteries not only in pre- and poststenotic vessels, but also in eccentric lesions. In patients with endothelial dysfunction, nitrates seem to be the physiological substitute for endothelium-derived relaxing factor. During the past decade, however, there has been substantial evidence of a clinically relevant loss of the anti-ischemic effects ("nitrate tolerance"). Many studies with oral dosing of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate at least three times daily have proven nitrate tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease and/or congestive heart failure. Complete loss of anti-ischemic effects after repetitive, continuous patch attachments has also been found. As we first showed in 1983, intermittent therapy with once-daily ingestion of high-dose sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate was successful in preventing the development of tolerance. Similarly, tolerance to isosorbide-5-mononitrate also does not develop when it is ingested once daily. It is now generally accepted that a daily low-nitrate interval is required to prevent tolerance development. Although the minimal patch-free interval required to prevent tolerance needs further investigation, a 12-h patch-free interval should prevent tolerance in most patients. The prolonged duration of action of once-daily high-dosage administration of sustained-release formulations, the improved patient compliance with a single daily administration, and the increased likelihood of maximal anti-ischemic effects are important reasons for recommending high single daily doses of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate.

Silent myocardial ischemia: an update

Silent myocardial ischemia is diagnosed by several different techniques and has been documented in all the anginal syndromes. In addition to other factors, its presence may be related to increased pain threshold and increased pain tolerance. Although some patients with painless ischemia may have less extensive coronary artery disease, cumulative evidence indicates that silent myocardial ischemia does not necessarily signify a lesser degree of cardiac ischemia or a less severe coronary abnormality. As judged by ambulatory monitoring studies, it shows circadian variation; occurs more frequently than symptomatic ischemia; and appears to depend, in large part, on activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Frequent silent ischemic events during ambulatory monitoring are worrisome because they reflect the disease "activity" of single or multiple coronary atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, there may be a direct association between the severity of ischemia seen during Holter monitoring, the extent of underlying coronary artery disease or disease activity, and prognosis. When diagnosed by exercise testing, silent myocardial ischemia may be associated with significant coronary involvement. In this regard, patients with three vessel coronary disease, impaired left ventricular function, and silent ischemia during stress testing should benefit from coronary revascularization. Compared with symptomatic patients, other evidence suggests that patients with exercise-induced asymptomatic ischemia have at least the same or perhaps even a worse outlook; this may be related to the lack of symptoms that would prompt evaluation and therapy. Awareness of the possibility of silent myocardial ischemia and use of commonly available tests, both to establish its presence and severity and to guide treatment, are emerging as new clinical goals. Further data, however, are necessary to determine how vigorously this should be pursued in different patient subgroups. In association with unstable angina or post-myocardial infarction, the added risk of silent myocardial ischemia warrants a more aggressive approach.