Efficacy and electrophysiologic effects of encainide for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Effects of cardioactive medications on retrograde conduction: Continuing relevance for current devices

INTRODUCTION

Retroconduction (ventriculo-atrial conduction) remains a problem for patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices. Pacemaker algorithms can detect and terminate endless loop tachycardia (ELT), but actual prevention of ELT may require anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Similarly, AADs can affect ICD rhythm discrimination algorithms that depend on atrio-ventricular ratios. There is concern whether these drugs remain effective during stress situations.

METHODS

Electrophysiologic studies that included retroconduction testing using slow ramp pacing were done in 1332 patients. The presence or absence of retroconduction at baseline and with drug was recorded, as was the rate at block. As a stress surrogate, isoproterenol was used to test retroconduction and reversal of drug-induced block.

RESULTS

Procainamide, mexiletine, phenytoin, disopyramide, quinidine, beta-blockers, encainide, and amiodarone caused complete retrograde block or decreased the rate at which block occurred (mean 76% of patients, p < 0.008), whereas digoxin, lidocaine, diltiazem, and verapamil did not. Isoproterenol (in the absence of AADs) increased the rate at block in 82% of 404 patients with retroconduction at baseline (p < 0.005). Of 319 patients without retroconduction at baseline, 134 (42%) developed retroconduction after isoproterenol. Isoproterenol reversed retrograde block in 39% of patients with block on an AAD. Amiodarone, digoxin, and the combination of digoxin plus a beta-blocker were most effective at resisting this reversal of ventriculo-atrial block (80%, 68%, and 75% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most of the AADs reviewed increase the cycle length at block or abolish retroconduction, while isoproterenol has the opposite effect. Anti-arrhythmic medications, particularly amiodarone, digoxin, and the combination of digoxin plus a beta-blocker may be considered for a patient with multiple ELT episodes or certain ICD detection problems.

Intravenous 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl-encainide in reentrant supraventricular tachycardia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing EP study

Encainide is an agent effective in atrioventricular and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE) are responsible for the clinical effects of encainide in most patients. In this study, intravenous MODE was evaluated in eight patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiological testing. After tachycardia was induced at least twice to ensure reproducibility, MODE (30 micrograms/kg/min x 15 min, then 7.5 micrograms/kg/min) or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion. If tachycardia remained inducible, the infusion was unblinded; in nonresponding subjects who received placebo, MODE was then administered. Placebo was ineffective in 3/3 patients. MODE prevented tachycardia induction in 5/8 patients and increased the tachycardia cycle length from 302 +/- 38 to 413 +/- 67 msec in the other three. At a mean concentration of 774 +/- 229 ng/ml, MODE prolonged PR, AH, HV, QRS, and QT intervals, right ventricular and accessory pathway effective refractory periods, and slowed or blocked antegrade accessory pathway conduction. Changes in intracardiac conduction were rate independent between cycle lengths 400 to 600 msec, while changes in ventricular effective refractory periods were most pronounced at rapid pacing rates. No adverse effects, hemodynamic changes, or conduction disturbances occurred. Thus, MODE can modify or suppress induction of reentrant atrioventricular or atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. The study design used here is well suited for the evaluation of newer antiarrhythmic agents by electrophysiological testing.

Efficacy of encainide in supraventricular arrhythmias

This review summarizes the data from all the studies conducted in the United States and Europe that have evaluated the efficacy of encainide in patients with a variety of supraventricular arrhythmias. Using clinical criteria of efficacy, encainide was found to be effective or partially effective in 77% of patients evaluated by electrophysiologic means. Similar levels of efficacy were observed in patients with AV as well as AV nodal reentry arrhythmias. Patients with other forms of supraventricular arrhythmias in smaller series also experienced comparable degrees of efficacy. Encainide was discontinued because of intolerance by 8% of the patients in these studies: 6% because of side effects and 2% because of proarrhythmia.

Use of intracardiac recordings to determine the site of drug action in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia most often results from atrioventricular (AV) reentry using an accessory AV pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or reentry within the region of the AV node. In AV reentry, using an accessory pathway, suppression of the tachycardia may be achieved by depressing either anterograde AV nodal conduction or retrograde accessory pathway conduction. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation have established that beta-adrenergic antagonists and calcium channel blockers principally affect AV nodal conduction (anterograde limb of the reentrant circuit), whereas class IA and IC agents principally affect the accessory AV pathway (retrograde limb). Pharmacologic therapy has been more effective when directed at the limb in which conduction is most marginal at the tachycardia rate (weak limb). In individual patients, intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can be used to identify the weak limb, indicating the class of agents most likely to be effective. Specialized techniques allowing direct recording of accessory pathway activation suggest that limitations in accessory pathway conduction may be explained by anatomic impediments. Conduction is most limited at the atrial interface of the accessory pathway in some patients, whereas in others the ventricular interface may be the limiting factor. Class IA and IC agents appear to have the greatest effect at sites where conduction is most tenuous, i.e., at the anatomic impediments. Similar considerations apply to AV nodal reentry. Anterograde slow AV nodal pathway conduction is most often depressed by digitalis preparations, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and calcium channel blockers, whereas retrograde fast AV nodal pathway conduction is more often depressed by class IA and IC agents. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can also be used in these patients to identify the weak limb and direct pharmacologic therapy. Direct catheter recordings of AV nodal conduction remain elusive, limiting knowledge of the different conduction properties of the anterograde and retrograde limbs and the site(s) of drug action. Studies in progress, comparing the retrograde AV nodal conduction time during tachycardia with that during ventricular pacing at the same rate, suggest that the His bundle may be incorporated in the reentrant circuit in some patients. It appears that verapamil more readily depresses retrograde fast pathway conduction in these patients than in those in whom the His bundle does not form part of the reentrant circuit, but the reasons for this are unknown.