Relation of acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy to left ventricular function in coronary artery disease

A history of heart failure predicts arrhythmia treatment efficacy: data from the Antiarrythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) study

BACKGROUND

In survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT), a history of CHF (HxCHF) before the VT episode may provide different prognostic information than their measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

We evaluated outcomes from patients in the AVID study. Patients were included in the study if they presented with ventricular fibrillation, VT with syncope or VT with hemodynamic compromise, and LVEF < or = 40%. Treatment options included implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), usually amiodarone.

RESULTS

As expected, a HxCHF is associated with an increased and high risk of arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death. However, an interaction was observed between arrhythmia treatment (ICD or AAD) and HxCHF status: the survival advantage with an ICD, as compared with AAD therapy, is largely restricted to HxCHF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICD is no better than AAD therapy in preventing arrhythmic death in patients with no HxCHF. In this data set, a HxCHF is somewhat more accurate in predicting prognosis and the response to therapy than a reduced LVEF.

Infarct related artery patency: relation to serial electropharmacological studies and outcome in patients with previous myocardial infarction and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Evidence suggests that infarct related artery (IRA) patency may improve survival after acute myocardial infarction, which is thought to be partially due to a lower incidence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of IRA patency on antiarrhythmic drug response and long-term outcome in patients with previous infarction who already experienced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A total of 152 patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) underwent coronary angiography and programmed ventricular stimulation before and after oral administration of d,l-sotalol (240-640 mg/day). D,l-sotalol suppressed inducibility of VT/VF in 37 (25.2%) patients. The IRA was patent in 38.1% of all patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of drug response between patients with patent or occluded IRAs (26.8% vs 24.2%, P = 0.87). In patients with a patent IRA, d,l-sotalol tended to be more effective in the absence of a left ventricular aneurysm, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.38). Ejection fraction and collateral blood flow had no effect on drug response in the presence or absence of IRA patency. During follow-up (13.0 +/- 19.9 months) of 29 patients discharged on oral d,l-sotalol, 3 patients experienced symptomatic VT and 4 sudden death. Arrhythmia recurrence and death of all cause (n = 6) and cardiac death (n = 4) were independent of IRA patency status. IRA patency had no effect on short-term drug response to d,l-sotalol in patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented VT/VF. Long-term outcome of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias is independent of IRA patency status. In contrast to a previous report, outcome of electropharmacological testing was not predicted by the patency of the IRA.

Relative effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction who have survived malignant ventricular arrhythmias. AVID Investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effect of baseline ejection fraction on survival difference between patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who were treated with an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

BACKGROUND

The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) study demonstrated improved survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =0.40 or hemodynamic compromise.

METHODS

Survival differences between AAD-treated and ICD-treated patients entered into the AVID study (patients presenting with sustained ventricular arrhythmia associated with an LVEF < or =0.40 or hemodynamic compromise) were compared at different levels of ejection fraction.

RESULTS

In patients with an LVEF > or =0.35, there was no difference in survival between AAD-treated and ICD-treated patients. A test for interaction was not significant, but had low power to detect an interaction. For patients with an LVEF 0.20 to 0.34, there was a significantly improved survival with ICD as compared with AAD therapy. In the smaller subgroup with an LVEF <0.20, the same magnitude of survival difference was seen as that in the 0.20 to 0.34 LVEF subgroup, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that patients with relatively well-preserved LVEF (> or =0.35) may not have better survival when treated with the ICD as compared with AADs. At a lower LVEF, the ICD appears to offer improved survival as compared with AADs. Prospective studies with larger patient numbers are needed to assess the effect of relatively well-preserved ejection fraction (> or =0.35) on the relative treatment effect of AADs and the ICDs.

Comparison of metoprolol and sotalol in preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmias after the implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate, on an intention-to-treat basis, the efficacy of d,l-sotalol and metoprolol with regards to the recurrence of arrhythmic events after implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. After ICD implantation, 70 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either metoprolol (mean dosage 104+/-37 mg/day in 35 patients) or d,l-sotalol (mean dosage 242+/-109 mg/day in 35 patients). During follow up ventricular tachycardia (VT), fast VT, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes were calculated. Metoprolol treatment led to a marked reduction in the recurrence of arrhythmic events. Actuarial rates for absence of VT recurrence at 1 and 2 years were significantly higher in the metoprolol group compared with the d,l-sotalol group (83% and 80% vs 57% and 51%, respectively, p=0.016). The actuarial rates for absence of fast VT or VF were 80% in the metoprolol group compared with 46% in the d,l-sotalol group (p=0.002). During a follow up of 26+/-16 months, there were 3 deaths in the metoprolol group compared with 6 deaths in the d,l-sotalol group. Actuarial rates of overall survival were not significantly different in the 2 groups (91% vs 83%, p=0.287). In this prospective, randomized, controlled study the recurrence rate of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients treated with metoprolol was lower than in patients treated by d,l-sotolol.

Mechanisms of arrhythmias in heart failure

The diagnosis of heart failure infers a bad prognosis. Mortality is high and many patients die suddenly. Ventricular arrhythmias, commonly observed in patients with heart failure, are thought to underlie at least some of these sudden deaths. The mechanism of arrhythmias occurring in the setting of heart failure is still unclear. Experimental evidence points to a higher tendency for failing myocardium to develop delayed and early afterdepolarization-induced triggered activity and automaticity. Conditions favoring reentry also have been described in failing hearts. Modulating factors such as sympathetic activation, electrolyte disturbances, and chronic stretch are present in the setting of heart failure and may favor all of the mentioned mechanisms of arrhythmias. Clinical evaluation of arrhythmias in patients and animals with heart failure and the effects of pharmacologic treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with depressed left ventricular function further accentuate that more than one mechanism of arrhythmia may be operating in heart failure and underscore the importance of modulating factors such as sympathetic activation and stretch.

Arrhythmias and sudden death in heart failure

Survival of patients with heart failure has improved over the past decade due to advances in medical therapy. Sudden death continues to cause 20 to 50% of deaths. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure. Ventricular hypertrophy, scars from prior myocardial infarction, sympathetic activation, and electrolyte abnormalities contribute. Some sudden deaths are due to bradyarrhythmias and electromechanical dissociation rather than ventricular arrhythmias. The risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapies continue to be defined. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided due to proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects that may increase mortality. For patients resuscitated from sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered. ICDs markedly reduce sudden death in VT/VF survivors, but in advanced heart failure, this may not markedly extend survival. Catheter or surgical ablation can be considered for selected patients with bundle branch reentry VT or difficult to control monomorphic VT. For patients who have not had sustained VT/VF antiarrhythmic therapy should generally be avoided, but may benefit some high risk patients. Amiodarone may be beneficial in patients with advanced heart failure and rapid resting heart rates. ICDs may improve survival in selected survivors of myocardial infarction who have inducible VT.

Efficacy and safety of d,l-sotalol in patients with ventricular tachycardia and in survivors of cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of d,l-sotalol in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and in survivors of cardiac arrest and to identify the factors that are associated with arrhythmia suppression and therefore might be helpful in predicting drug efficacy.

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing use of the class III antiarrhythmic agent d,l-sotalol, data on its short- and long-term efficacy in a large patient cohort are lacking. Information on its long-term tolerability and safety is limited.

METHODS

A total of 396 patients with inducible sustained VT or VF (VT/VF) underwent programmed stimulation before and after receiving oral d,l-sotalol (240 to 640 mg/day). Patients in whom VT/VF was rendered either noninducible or more difficult to induce (more extrastimuli or faster drive cycle length needed for VT/VF induction) were discharged on a regimen of oral d,l-sotalol.

RESULTS

d,l-Sotalol suppressed VT/VF in 151 patients (38.1%) and rendered the arrhythmia more difficult to induce in 76 patients (19.2%). The extent of drug-induced prolongation of right ventricular refractoriness and a shorter VT cycle length at baseline were independent predictors of immediate drug efficacy. Torsade de pointes developed in seven patients (1.8%). Two hundred ten patients (53%) continued to receive d,l-sotalol and were followed up for 34 +/- 18 months (mean +/- SD). The actuarial rates for the absence of arrhythmic recurrence (either VT/VF or sudden death) at 1 and 3 years were 89% and 77%, respectively. Actuarial rates for overall survival at 1 and 3 years were 94% and 86%, respectively. VT/VF suppression by d,l-sotalol was an independent discriminant variable that separated patients with and without arrhythmia recurrence. However, noninducibility of VT/VF did not predict freedom from sudden death.

CONCLUSION

Oral d,l-sotalol is effective and safe in patients with VT/VF. However, sudden cardiac death develops in a significant proportion of patients, and programmed stimulation seems to be of limited value for its prediction.

Evaluation and Management of Sudden Death Survivors

Only 20% of patients survive a cardiac arrest. Up to 80% of patients have a cardiac arrest secondary to a ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In the adult population, over 70% of the above patients have obstructive coronary artery disease; thus, coronary arteriography should be performed in all survivors of cardiac arrest. Once reversible causes have been treated, antiarrhythmic therapy is usually guided by Holter monitoring, electrophysiologic testing or both. Due to high recurrence rates on antiarrhythmic drugs, many patients are now treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Although these devices appear to improve sudden death survival, long-term overall survival may not be superior to “best drug therapy.” This hypothesis is currently being tested in two prospective randomized, multicenter trials.

Cycle length dependence of the electrophysiological effects of increased load on the myocardium

BACKGROUND

Mechanoelectric feedback, the process by which changes in mechanical activity change the electrophysiology of the myocardium, has been linked to the genesis of arrhythmias. We investigated possible arrhythmogenic mechanisms by measuring changes in steady-state action potential duration and, more particularly, electrical restitution on a transiently applied load change, because action potential recovery may provide clues to arrhythmogenesis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pigs were anesthetized and their hearts exposed. A snare was placed around the aorta, and the right atrium was paced. Ventricular pressure, monophasic action potential, and segment motion were recorded from the left ventricle. The action potential duration was measured before and during transient aortic occlusion. Electrical restitution curves were constructed from the records obtained during normal loading or during transient aortic occlusion. The degree of shortening of action potential duration on aortic occlusion decreased with decreases in the steady-state beat-to-beat interval (P = .0008). Control restitution curves had the typical configuration, with a rapid initial, usually monotonic, rise toward a plateau. Some curves showed a marginal "supernormal" section. Increased load reduced the action potential duration at the plateau of the restitution curve (9.4 ms, P < .0001) but increased the action potential duration at the start of the restitution curve (8.7 ms, P = .03). Increased loading increased the maximum slope of the electrical restitution curve by 32 ms/100 ms (P = .04). Increased load also increased the supernormal period of the electrical restitution curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanoelectric feedback produces changes in rate-dependent electrophysiology, which could favor a matrix conducive to arrhythmogenesis.

Beta adrenergic blockade in the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation

The value of beta-blockers as antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with sustained VT or VF has received only little attention. This article summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the identification of patients with sustained VT or VF with the highest benefit of beta-blockade. The antiarrhythmic mechanisms of beta-blockade and its efficacy as single or adjuvant therapy in patients with sustained VT or VF are reviewed. Current insights into the effects of beta-blockade in patients suffering from VT, in particular in the setting of heart failure, are discussed and future directions are considered.

Relations between heart failure, ejection fraction, arrhythmia suppression and mortality: analysis of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

OBJECTIVES

We studied the relations between heart failure, ejection fraction, arrhythmia suppression and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Both left ventricular ejection fraction and functional class of heart failure are strongly associated with mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Both are also related to the presence of ventricular arrhythmias and have been identified as factors related to the ability to suppress ventricular arrhythmias. Little has been reported about the relations between these two factors and arrhythmia suppression or mortality.

METHODS

Baseline data from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial were used to define several categories of heart failure and to relate both the resulting categories and ejection fraction to arrhythmia suppression and mortality using logistic and survival regression analytic methodologies.

RESULTS

Regardless of the prospective baseline definition of heart failure used, the data consistently showed that heart failure was a more powerful predictor of subsequent congestive heart failure events and arrhythmia suppression and was equally powerful in predicting death. However, each variable provided incremental information when included in the prediction model. Heart failure and ejection fraction appeared to be independent predictors of death. Interactions were observed: A low ejection fraction was more predictive of failure of arrhythmia suppression in patients with than without evidence of heart failure before or at baseline; a low ejection fraction was more predictive of subsequent congestive heart failure events in patients without than with evidence of heart failure before or at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Although heart failure as a prognostic feature appears to be somewhat superior to ejection fraction, both are powerful predictors of arrhythmia suppression and cardiac events in patients with ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction. Each provides incremental prediction.

Association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmia and survival

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are easy to suppress have a lower rate of arrhythmic death, defined as arrhythmic death and nonfatal cardiac arrest, the primary end point in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials (CAST-I and CAST-II), than patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are hard to suppress. In addition, we evaluated the association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality of all causes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CAST-I investigated the effect on arrhythmic death of ventricular premature depolarization (VPD) suppression achieved by three drugs, encainide, flecainide, and moricizine, at two different dose levels; CAST-II investigated the same effect, using moricizine alone at three dose levels. If suppression was achieved, patients were randomized to the effective active drug or corresponding placebo. To examine the independence of easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias as a predictor of arrhythmic death, we adjusted statistically for other variables that were related both to ease of suppression and arrhythmic death. Patients with ventricular arrhythmias (n = 1778) that were easy to suppress had fewer arrhythmic deaths during follow-up than those with ventricular arrhythmias that were hard to suppress (n = 1173) (relative risk, .59; P = .003). Patients whose VPDs were easily suppressed were older and had a lower frequency of prior history of heart failure and myocardial infarction. They also had a higher incidence of anterior myocardial infarction, VPD frequency, and average ejection fraction. After adjusting for these variables, we found that easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias were still significant predictors of arrhythmic death (relative risk, .66; P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the ease of VPD suppression identifies a subgroup of postmyocardial infarction patients who have low risk of arrhythmic death.

Lipids and cardiac arrhythmia

In any discussion of lipids and heart disease it is beneficial from the outset to recognise that at least three different pathological processes may be involved. The first of these is atherosclerosis which involves the deposition of "fat" in the coronary vessels, another is thrombogenesis which describes the formation of blood clots in the coronary vessels, and the third is arrhythmia which refers to disorders in the beating of the heart which may become sufficiently serious to cause sudden cardiac death (SCD). Also it is this disturbance in the rhythmic beating of the heart which is responsible for much of the mortality from 'heart attacks' which occur 'outside-of-hospital' in societies like U.S.A., U.K. and Australia. It is this latter condition of cardiac arrhythmia which is the major concern of this review. Because it is often difficult to differentiate the role of lipids in 'heart disease' in man, it has frequently been assumed that all dietary fatty acids have similar effects on the different processes involved, and many unwarranted generalisations have been made which have led to conflicts of opinion amongst physicians and confusion in the lay public. From the animal studies discussed in this review, it is apparent that dietary fatty acids have an important role to play in determining the vulnerability of the myocardium to develop serious ventricular fibrillation (VF) and potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia. In general, diets rich in saturated fatty acids promote a state of myocardial vulnerability, whilst diets rich in PUFA significantly diminish the probability of developing lethal disorders in cardiac rhythm when the heart is placed under pharmacological (or emotional) stress, or deprived of sufficient blood flow and supply of oxygen. Very recent experiments with the monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) oleic acid clearly demonstrate that, at least in rats subjected to ligation of their coronary artery, this acid is not 'neutral' as has been suggested by some for its role in atherosclerosis, but in fact is indistinguishable from saturated fatty acids in its effect in promoting arrhythmia during either regional ischaemia or reperfusion arrhythmia in this animal model of SCD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A prospective study of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant metoprolol and xamoterol in combination with amiodarone for resistant ventricular tachycardia associated with impaired left ventricular function

Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy may be more effective than treatment with a single agent for control of refractory cases of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). In a prospective randomized crossover study of 20 patients with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction of 28% +/- 8%) and recurrent VT in spite of treatment with amiodarone, we compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapy with metoprolol, 50 mg two times daily and xamoterol, 200 mg two times daily. Metoprolol caused hemodynamic deterioration in five patients, and only one also experienced intolerance to xamoterol. Sustained VT was inducible in all 20 patients who were receiving amiodarone alone but was suppressed or rendered nonsustained in 8 of 20 patients during treatment with amiodarone plus xamoterol and in 6 of 17 patients during treatment with amiodarone plus metoprolol. Addition of xamoterol restored sinus rhythm in four patients who presented with incessant VT, and metoprolol was effective for three of them. Neither beta-blocker significantly altered tachycardia cycle length or any electrophysiologic parameter other than the slowing of the sinus rate. Both beta-blockers suppressed exercise-induced VT in 3 of 4 patients, and addition of xamoterol significantly increased treadmill exercise duration (7.1 +/- 1.8 min) compared with administration of amiodarone alone (3.8 +/- 1.5 min; p < 0.01). Fourteen patients were discharged with prescriptions for amiodarone-beta-blocker combinations. During a mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 2 to 24 months), there were three cases of recurrent VT (in all patients VT remained inducible) and no sudden deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prevention of sudden cardiac death: the ICD, or an electrical end-point with preceding opportunities for intervention?

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is usually due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation. However, in the vast majority of patients these arrhythmias are associated with advanced structural disease. In our society, this is usually due to coronary artery disease (CAD). The implantable cardioverter--defibrillator is the logical approach to management in survivors of SCD. Its rational use must be guided by electrophysiology study. However, a realistic and cost-effective approach to the prevention of a first cardiac arrest must be multifaceted and take cognisance of other aspects including primary prevention. Limitation of the size of myocardial infarction (MI) is vital. Trials already suggests that effective thrombolysis may impinge long-term on arrhythmic end-points. Following infarction, ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death may also be decreased by aspirin, beta-blockers, and possibly angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and amiodarone. Many post-infarction studies employ a combined end-point of death and clinical arrhythmias. However, death is usually confined to those with an ejection fraction < 35%. In them, treatment of associated heart failure is often a consideration and if the ejection fraction < 15-20%, depending on donor availability, transplantation may even be the preferred therapeutic option to the cardioverter-defibrillator.

Short- and long-term antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic effects of d,l-sotalol in patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic effects of sotalol (160 to 480 mg/day), a beta-blocking agent that prolongs ventricular repolarization, were examined in 38 patients with complex symptomatic ventricular ectopic activity. During ambulatory monitoring, 24 patients (63%) exhibited a reduction of greater than 75% in single ventricular premature beats (VPBs) and greater than 90% reduction in repetitive arrhythmia. In contrast to the effects of other agents, left ventricular ejection fraction as determined by radionuclide angiography was not impaired, increasing slightly from 45 +/- 14% to 47 +/- 14% during therapy (p less than 0.05). Antiarrhythmic drug efficacy did not correlate with baseline ejection fraction or sotalol-induced changes in ventricular function. Late follow-up studies disclosed that antiarrhythmic efficacy and tolerance were maintained in the majority of patients. Repeat radionuclide angiography at 6 months revealed no late drug-induced depression of left ventricular function. Sotalol appears to be an effective and well tolerated agent for treatment of complex ventricular ectopic activity, even in the setting of compromised cardiac function.

Events in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST): mortality in patients surviving open label titration but not randomized to double-blind therapy

The patient characteristics and outcomes were studied in the 318 patients who survived open label drug titration in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) and who were not randomized to double-blind therapy and in 942 patients, who were randomized to double-blind placebo therapy. The patients randomized to placebo therapy had a lower total mortality or resuscitated cardiac arrest rate (4% vs. 8.5%). However, at baseline, nonrandomized patients were dissimilar from patients randomized to placebo in the following ways: older; lower left ventricular ejection fraction; greater use of digitalis, diuretic drugs and antihypertensive agents; lesser use of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents and more frequent prior cardiac problems, including runs of ventricular tachycardia and left bundle branch block. A matched comparison that took these inequities into account showed no significant differences in mortality or rate of resuscitation from cardiac arrest between nonrandomized patients and clinically equivalent patients randomized to placebo. Cox regression analysis indicated that two factors significantly increased the hazard ratio for arrhythmic death or resuscitated cardiac arrest in the nonrandomized patients: female gender (4.7, p less than 0.05) and electrocardiographic events (ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, widened QRS complex, heart block, bradycardia) during open label titration (7.0, p less than 0.005). However, some potentially important differences between men and women were not included in the Cox regression model. Of the nonrandomized patients, approximately 70% were not randomized because of lack of suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations or adverse events, or both, and the remaining 30% because of patient or private physician request with no indication of another reason.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term follow-up after sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: Causes, pump failure, and empiric antiarrhythmic therapy that modify survival

We analyzed the actuarial cardiac mortality rate of 295 consecutive patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia who were referred to us between 1978 and 1988. Patients were divided into four groups: group I of 156 patients with coronary disease, group II of 55 patients with nonischemic left ventricular disease, group III of 65 patients with right ventricular disease, and group IV of 19 patients without detectable heart disease. Patients were treated empirically according to a prospective schema: (1) class I antiarrhythmic drugs, (2) in case of recurrence of ventricular tachycardia: amiodarone or beta-blockers, (3) in case of recurrence of ventricular tachycardia: drug combinations or surgery. The mean follow-up duration was 61 +/- 40 months after the first occurrence of ventricular tachycardia, and the clinical outcome was known in 67.5% of patients at 5 years. The actuarial mortality rates were considerably higher in groups I and II compared with those in groups III and IV (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate was slightly higher in group I than in group II (p less than 0.05). In groups I and II, actuarial mortality rate were much higher when left ventricular ejection fraction was less than 0.30 (p less than 0.01). Comparisons between treatments showed no difference in actuarial mortality rates in patients with ventricular tachycardia and left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 0.30.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term effect of mexiletine on left ventricular function and relation to suppression of ventricular arrhythmia

The effects of oral mexiletine on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and ventricular arrhythmias--and a possible relation between these effects--were evaluated during 3 months of therapy in 29 patients with chronic ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and a moderately reduced to normal LVEF by 24-hour Holter monitoring and by radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during maximum tolerable exercise testing. After an average titration period of 13 days, a mean daily mexiletine dose of 739 mg was maintained throughout the treatment. At the end of titration and after 3 months of treatment, patients with a baseline LVEF less than or equal to 40% (group 2) responded with a median reduction of the hourly VPC rate by 90 and 81%, respectively, compared with 79 and 72% in those with a baseline LVEF greater than 40% (group 1). Couplets and runs of ventricular tachycardia were almost completely suppressed in nearly all patients. A single patient had a proarrhythmic increase in VPCs during treatment. Compared with baseline, there were no significant changes in resting or exercise LVEF after 1 or 3 months of treatment in either of the 2 groups of patients. No correlation was found between treatment-induced changes in arrhythmia frequency and in resting EF. No symptoms of congestive heart failure developed. The study confirms that long-term use of mexiletine is efficacious and relatively free of cardiac depressant effects even in patients with diminished LV function.

Reassessment of benefit-risk ratio and treatment algorithms for antiarrhythmic drug therapy after the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) has led to serious reconsideration of both the benefit-risk ratio of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and the appropriate therapeutic approach to various cardiac arrhythmias. Class IC drugs, such as encainide and flecainide, should not be used to treat asymptomatic postinfarction arrhythmias. Furthermore, because the CAST raises serious questions about the concept of treating asymptomatic but "potentially malignant" (prognostically important) arrhythmias guided by ambulatory monitoring, the prophylactic use of any of the antiarrhythmic agents (except beta blockers) must be considered inappropriate and potentially harmful until otherwise established by specific clinical trials. For prophylaxis of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation), treatment may still begin with standard agents in classes IA, IB, or both, preferably guided by electrophysiologic testing alone or in combination with noninvasive testing. Class IC therapy may be most useful in those patients in this group who do not have such high-risk characteristics for proarrhythmia as a history of multiple myocardial infarctions (MIs), congestive heart failure, or low ejection fraction. Amiodarone is moderately effective for treating these arrhythmias but is reserved as second- or third-line therapy because of its potential organ toxicity. Sotalol, a beta blocker with class III activity, is often effective and relatively well tolerated in these patients and may become a preferred drug when approved. For symptomatic but nonmalignant ventricular arrhythmias, a more conservative approach is more appropriate than in the past, with therapy reversed for those with debilitating symptoms. An initial trial of beta blockade is often appropriate before class I agents are considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Predictive value of electrophysiologic studies during treatment of ventricular tachycardia with the beta-blocking agent nadolol. The Working Group on Arrhythmias of the French Society of Cardiology

Sixty patients with recurrent inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia were prospectively treated with nadolol (40 or 80 mg/day). Old myocardial infarction was present in 43 patients and dilated cardiomyopathy in 12. In group I (n = 36), nadolol was given alone, whereas in group II (n = 24), previously ineffective treatment with amiodarone was continued in combination with nadolol. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in patients in group I (0.40 +/- 0.12) than in group II (0.30 +/- 0.10, p less than 0.01) patients. Electrophysiologic study was repeated after short-term treatment with nadolol, which was continued regardless of the results of this test, according to the scheme of the parallel approach. Recurrence of spontaneous tachycardia or sudden death occurred in 21 patients after 10 +/- 9.2 months; sustained tachycardia was inducible in 19 on nadolol therapy. The remaining 39 patients (of whom 21 had inducible tachycardia while taking the drug) have had no recurrence of tachycardia after 27.8 +/- 9.3 months of follow-up study. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a positive and negative test were 90.5%, 46%, 47.5% and 90%, respectively. The results differ between group I and group II patients, the latter having a high percent of false positive responses. This difference is even more obvious with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction: the predictive value of a positive test was 86% when ejection fraction was greater than 0.40 and 39% when it was less than 0.40.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims with coronary artery disease

The effect of empiric antiarrhythmic therapy with quinidine and procainamide on long-term mortality was examined in 209 patients with coronary artery disease resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The antiarrhythmic agent used was determined by the patient's private physician without knowledge of the study ambulatory electrocardiogram. Of the 209 patients, procainamide was prescribed in 45 (22%), quinidine in 48 (23%) and no antiarrhythmic therapy in 116 (55%). Digoxin therapy was initiated in 101 patients. The 2-year total survival rate for the quinidine, procainamide and nontreated patients was 61, 57 and 71% (p less than 0.05), and for sudden death was 69, 69 and 89% (p less than 0.01), respectively. These observations suggest that empiric antiarrhythmic therapy in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not affect total mortality and was associated with an increased frequency of sudden death.

Efficacy and safety of moricizine in patients with congestive heart failure: a summary of the experience in the United States

Patients with ventricular premature beats (VPBs) and congestive heart failure (CHF) have an increased risk of sudden death, yet suppression of arrhythmia in this population is frequently complicated by proarrhythmia and by the negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of moricizine in patients with clinical CHF. The New Drug Application data base submitted to the Food and Drug Administration was analyzed. A total of 908 patients were treated with moricizine for ventricular arrhythmias; CHF developed in 49 of them (5.4%). Of the 908 patients, 374 had a history of CHF, 326 of whom tolerated moricizine for a mean of 97 +/- 217 days. New-onset CHF occurred only once (1/546 = 0.2%). Recurrence or exacerbation of clinical CHF during treatment with moricizine occurred in 48 of 374 patients (12.8%), 28 of whom continued to take moricizine with alteration in CHF therapy. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of those patients in whom CHF developed was 26%. It is important to note that patients with a history of CHF were as likely to have suppression of VPBs (defined as greater than or equal to 75% reduction) as those without a history of CHF. In fact, suppression of arrhythmia was achieved as often in patients with LVEF less than 30% as in those with more preserved LVEF. Of the 374 patients with a history of CHF, 15 (4%) had a proarrhythmic event within 14 days of therapy. The incidence of sudden cardiac death in this group was 0.8%. These proarrhythmia rates compare favorably with those of other antiarrhythmic drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The inverse relationship between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and outcome of antiarrhythmic therapy: a dangerous imbalance in the risk-benefit ratio

Each year, millions of prescriptions are written for antiarrhythmic drug suppression of ventricular arrhythmias. A large portion of these prescriptions are written for patients with asymptomatic, complex ventricular arrhythmias and organic heart disease, termed "potentially malignant" or "potentially lethal." Since arrhythmia suppression in this population is of unproven benefit, we performed the following study: A total of 246 patients (42% with significant left ventricular dysfunction) had complex ventricular arrhythmias, and were treated with one of eight antiarrhythmic drugs (Vaughan Williams classes IA, IB, IC, II, and III). The extent of arrhythmia suppression and the development of serious complications resulting from therapy after 2 weeks was of primary interest. A total of 82 of 246 (33%) maintained adequate (protocol definition) suppression of both ventricular premature beats (VPBs) as well as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) for 2 weeks, mostly in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 40% (p = 0.04 versus LVEF less than 40%). Life-threatening complications of antiarrhythmic therapy occurred most frequently in the 61 patients with an LVEF less than 30% compared to the 185 patients with LVEF greater than or equal to 30% (15% versus 2.1%, p = 0.0005). Suppression of VT was achieved nearly twice as commonly in patients with an LVEF greater than or equal to 30% than in those with an LVEF less than 30% (67% versus 36%; p = 0.0008). Life-threatening complications occurred seven times as frequently in patients presenting with nonsustained VT and an LVEF less than 30% (18% versus 2.3%; p = 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Drug therapy for survivors of sudden cardiac death

The proliferation of standard as well as novel community based systems for resuscitation of victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has provided a large group of sudden cardiac death survivors who present a therapeutic challenge. The nature and severity of the underlying heart disease must be delineated. Particularly, myocardial ischemia and congestive heart failure must be controlled. Prior to considering device therapy of surgical intervention, pharmacologic therapy should be evaluated. Baseline electrophysiological studies determine the applicability of serial pharmacologic testing. In patients with inducible VT/VF, serial electrophysiological testing can identify drug regimens that prevent the arrhythmia in approximately 40% of patients. In an additional 20% of patients, regimens which slow the ventricular tachycardia and significantly reduce the arrhythmia related mortality can be identified. Three to 5-year follow-up has shown such an approach can reduce the sudden death mortality in these patients to less than 3% per year. It has been suggested that certain medication, most notably amiodarone, electrophysiological testing has not been useful in assessing efficacy. Several recent studies, however, have shown that electrophysiological testing is indeed useful even in evaluating the efficacy of amiodarone. In patients in whom ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation cannot be prevented or significantly slowed, medical therapy is generally ineffective and the sudden death mortality is 20% to 40% per year. In such patients, other therapeutic modalities should be considered.