Effect of age on antiarrhythmic drug efficacy and toxicity

Internal low energy atrial cardioversion: efficacy and safety in older patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Low-energy internal atrial cardioversion is a relatively new technique based on delivery of intracardiac shocks through transvenous catheters placed into the atria or the vessels.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess in older and younger patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) the efficacy and safety of transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion performed without routine administration of sedatives or anesthetics.

DESIGN

A prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

A cardiological university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

82 patients, divided into older (> or = 60 years) (n = 49) and younger (n = 33) subjects.

MEASUREMENTS

Atrial defibrillation threshold for internal cardioversion, measured as leading edge voltage (V) and delivered energy (J) of effective shocks, percentage of patients maintaining sinus rhythm at short-term (within 3 days) and at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with chronic persistent AF, treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 to 4 weeks, were admitted to hospital. Following a clinical work-up, patients were subjected to low-energy internal atrial cardioversion with shock delivery according to a step-up protocol.

RESULTS

Internal cardioversion was effective in restoring sinus rhythm in 90% (44/49) of the older patients and in 94% (31/33) of the younger patients. Shocks were effective at a mean energy between 6 and 8 joules (range 0.9-23) and administration of sedatives or anesthetics was required during the procedure in 22% (11/49) of older and in 48% (16/33) of younger patients (P = .026 at chi-square). No major complications occurred during the procedure. Pharmacological prophylaxis of AF recurrences was instituted immediately following the procedure. During inhospital stay and during the follow-up (mean 12 +/- 9 months for older patients and 15 +/- 10 months for younger patients), AF recurred in 39% (17/44) of older patients and in 16% (5/31) of younger subjects (P = .064 at chi-square).

CONCLUSIONS

Internal low energy cardioversion is a very effective procedure for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with AF; it can be performed in older patients, and administration of sedatives or anesthetics can be avoided or minimized in a substantial proportion of subjects. Recurrences of AF in the long term tend to be higher in older subjects and intensive prophylaxis with antiarrhythmic drugs is required.

Prolonged thrombocytopenia associated with procainamide in an elderly patient

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of thrombocytopenia associated with the use of extended-release procainamide hydrochloride in a geriatric patient.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for four-vessel coronary artery bypass surgery. He subsequently developed new onset atrial fibrillation and was started on extended-release procainamide on hospital day 7. The patient's platelet count on admission was 229 x 10(9)/L. The platelet count began to decrease on hospital day 22 and was 79 x 10(9)/L by day 30 and 13 x 10(9)/L by hospital day 37. The patient exhibited gross hematuria and lower extremity petechiae. There were no signs of splenic sequestration and other hematologic indices were normal. Procainamide was discontinued on hospital day 32. There was full recovery of the platelet count to baseline 33 days after procainamide was discontinued.

DISCUSSION

Other possible medical and drug-related causes of thrombocytopenia are reviewed and ruled out. Previous reports of procainamide-associated thrombocytopenia describe an immune-mediated peripheral destruction of platelets with platelet recovery within three to eight days after drug discontinuation. However, the prolonged recovery period and the presence of antiplatelet antibodies suggest an immune-mediated process in the bone marrow of this patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of the possible adverse hematologic effects of procainamide in the elderly.

Moricizine concentration to guide arrhythmia treatment: with attention to elderly patients

To test the relationship between plasma moricizine concentration and the electrocardiogram (ECG) and arrhythmia suppression, 17 symptomatic cardiac patients with 30 or more ventricular premature complexes per hour were studied. Seven patients were mature adults, less than 60 years of age; and ten were elderly adults, more than 60 years of age. During steady-state moricizine therapy, patients had plasma moricizine concentration determined over a dosing interval, and had standard 12-lead ECG and a 24-hour ambulatory ECG recorded. The mean moricizine dose was 215 +/- 29 mg every 8 hours; mean maximal moricizine concentration was 1.4 +/- 0.84 micrograms/ml; and mean t1/2 beta was 1.5 +/- 0.7 hours. Baseline age-related differences were found, including prolonged electrocardiographic intervals (PR and QRS) (P < .05), increased ventricular arrhythmias (P < .05), and reduction in creatinine clearance (P < .05) in the elderly. Compared with pretreatment values, PR (P < .05) and QRS (P < .05) prolongation was observed, and was more marked in elderly patients. Over a dosing interval, there were dynamic changes on the ECG that paralleled plasma moricizine concentration; that is, peak and nadir intact moricizine concentration occurred simultaneously with ECG changes: QRS and JTc prolonged (P < .05), and PR prolongation approached significance (P = 0.09). Suppression of ventricular premature complexes of 80% or more occurred in 15 patients, and ventricular tachycardia was abolished in 10 of 12 patients. Probit analysis revealed that the therapeutic antiarrhythmic concentration ranged from 0.20 to 3.6 micrograms/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of quinidine, procainamide and mexiletine

Quinidine and procainamide have the potential for major organ toxicity, whereas mexiletine has been reported to have little risk of organ toxicity, serious proarrhythmia or congestive heart failure, but a relatively high incidence of nuisance side effects. In light of the potential adverse effects of all antiarrhythmic agents as highlighted by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, the relative cost-effectiveness of these 3 agents was assessed. Based on a review of greater than 1,000 published reports, studies included in the analysis examined greater than or equal to 1 of these agents in adults, with adequate efficacy or safety data, or both. The majority of studies assessed patients with symptomatic or malignant arrhythmias, or both. Data were analyzed using a decision analysis/cost-effectiveness model. Probabilities were averaged using techniques of meta-analysis. Costs were obtained from a university medical center cost-accounting system and from expected follow-up visits to university clinics. Thirty-seven separate side effects were included in the analysis. In terms of overall cost, 12 months of mexiletine would engender $875, quinidine $1,239 and procainamide $1,911 of expenses. Mexiletine dominates the older agents in terms of cost per successful drug response, a result that holds over a wide range of efficacy and safety data. Analyses demonstrated no increase in all-cause mortality for quinidine and mexiletine over placebo, but a trend toward higher mortality with procainamide. The results suggest that mexiletine is a cost-saving alternative therapy for ventricular arrhythmias when adverse reactions are considered in addition to pharmaceutical costs and treatment efficacy.

Mexiletine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias

As a member of the class Ib antiarrhythmic drugs mexiletine's primary mechanism of action is blocking fast sodium channels, reducing the phase 0 maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential. It increases the ratio of effective refractory period to action potential duration, but has little effect on conductivity. Unlike quinidine it does not prolong QRS and QT (QTc) intervals. In the dosage range 600 to 900 mg daily mexiletine effectively suppresses premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 25% to 79% of patients, with or without underlying cardiac disease. In comparative studies the response rate was comparable to that with quinidine or disopyramide. However, the use of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with asymptomatic arrhythmias is controversial. More importantly, mexiletine abolishes spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the short term in 20% to 50% of patients with refractory arrhythmias. Arrhythmia suppression is maintained in 57% to over 80% of these early therapeutic successes in the long term, with mexiletine alone or in combination with another antiarrhythmic drug. As with other antiarrhythmic drugs, there is no substantial evidence that administration of mexiletine after acute myocardial infarction improves long term prognosis. Although the incidence of adverse effects associated with mexiletine is high, the majority are minor gastrointestinal or neurological effects which can be adequately controlled through dosage adjustment. Furthermore, mexiletine has minimal effects on haemodynamic variables, or on cardiac function in patients with or without pre-existing deterioration of left ventricular function, and it appears to have a low proarrhythmic potential. Thus, while the therapeutic efficacy of mexiletine for the prevention or suppression of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias may be no greater than that of other antiarrhythmic drugs, and less than that of some (e.g. amiodarone), it is effective in a significant proportion of patients refractory to other treatments and can be administered without causing adverse haemodynamic effects to patients with complicating factors such as acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure.