Identifying patients at high risk for restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for unstable angina pectoris

Achieving optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: can baseline and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

To predict which patients might not require stent implantation, we identified clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with repeat revascularization after standard balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Stents reduce the risk of repeat revascularization but are costly and may lead to in-stent restenosis, which remains difficult to treat. Identification of patients at low risk for repeat revascularization may allow clinicians to reserve stents for patients most likely to benefit.

METHODS

Data from five interventional trials (5,146 patients) were pooled for analysis. We identified patients with optimal angiographic results (final diameter stenosis < or =30% and no dissection) after balloon angioplasty and determined the multivariable predictors of repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Optimal angiographic results were achieved in 18% of patients after angioplasty. The repeat revascularization rate at six months was lower for patients with optimal results (20% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) but still higher than observed in stent trials. Independent predictors of repeat revascularization were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, p = 0.01), lesion length > or =10 mm (OR 1.62, p = 0.03) and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (OR 1.62, p = 0.03). For the 8% of patients with optimal angiographic results and none of these risk factors, the repeat revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were 14% and 8% respectively, similar to rates after stent implantation. Cost analysis estimated that $78 million per year might be saved in the U.S. with a provisional stenting strategy using these criteria compared with elective stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of baseline characteristics and angiographic results can be used to identify a small group of patients at very low risk for repeat revascularization after balloon angioplasty. Provisional stenting for these low risk patients could substantially reduce costs without compromising clinical outcomes.

Long-term outcome in patients with unstable angina treated by coronary balloon angioplasty

Comparison of balloon angioplasty results in 472 patients with stable angina (SA) and 158 patients with unstable angina (UA) in 5-year follow-up is reported. Clinical success rate did not differ significantly, while periprocedural complications rate was higher in UA group (22.3 vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). During follow-up UA patients demonstrated higher: restenosis rate (48.5 vs. 30.4%, P<0.001), incidence of myocardial infarction (8.8 vs. 3.0%, P=0.004), although cardiac mortality did not differ significantly (2.2 vs. 1.6%). Reintervention rate in patients with unstable angina resultant from restenosis or significant artherosclerosis progression in coronary vessels, or originating from both of them, was also higher (53.7 vs. 34.1%, P<0.001). Event-free survival was significantly lower in UA patients (43.4 vs. 61.3%, P=0.02). The uni- and multivariate analysis proved that unstable angina was an independent risk factor in restenosis, re-intervention and cardiac events rate, despite perceptible differences in the baseline characteristics. Sub-group analysis of UA patients according to Braunwald classification revealed lower success rate and higher incidence of myocardial infarction during follow-up in post-infarction angina (class C), whereas new onset, no-rest angina (class I) had higher event-free survival in comparison with rest angina (classes II and III).

CONCLUSIONS

UA patients treated by balloon angioplasty had higher periprocedural complications rate, as well as restenosis and re-intervention rate. Despite higher cardiovascular events rate during 5-year follow-up in UA group, survival rate in both groups was high and cardiac mortality did not differ significantly. Unstable angina constitutes a strong independent risk factor in adverse long-term outcome.

Long-term outcome in patients treated by intracoronary stenting with ticlopidine and aspirin, and deleterious prognostic role of unstable angina pectoris

Compared with stable clinical conditions, unstable angina carries an increased risk of immediate and delayed cardiac adverse events after balloon coronary angioplasty. The influence of stent use in reducing these differences remains unknown. We analyzed the early (30 days) and late outcome of a cohort of 459 consecutive patients who underwent stent placement with ticlopidine and aspirin as antithrombotic regimen according to the presence (group 1, n = 151) or absence (group 2, n = 308) of unstable angina at rest (Braunwald classes II and III). Group 1 patients were older and more likely to be current or former smokers. In group 2, prior myocardial infarction was more frequent. Procedural, in-hospital results, and early outcome were similar in the 2 groups. However, over the long term, the incidence of myocardial infarction (11% vs 6%, p <0.04), target lesion revascularization (19% vs 13%, p <0.04), or any revascularization (30% vs 20%, p <0.01) was significantly higher in group 1. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of survival without myocardial infarction (85% vs 91%, p <0.05), survival without revascularization of the target lesion (73% vs 83%, p <0.01), survival without any revascularization (65% vs 77%, p <0.006), and survival without any events (61% vs 73%, p <0.009) were significantly worse in group 1. In addition, Cox multivariate analysis showed that unstable angina at rest was an independent predictor of target lesion revascularization, of survival without any revascularization, and without any events. Thus, unstable angina at rest remains an adverse prognostic indicator in patients treated with intracoronary stents, particularly with regard to subsequent requirement of revascularization procedures and event-free survival.

Long-term (10-year) outcome in patients with unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine completed 10-year survival and event-free survival in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Patients with unstable angina are at increased risk for recurrent acute coronary events.

METHODS

The study included 208 consecutive patients (133 with stable and 75 with unstable angina pectoris) undergoing angioplasty from 1984 to 1986. The balloon crossed the lesion in 185 patients (121 with stable and 64 with unstable angina pectoris). Angioplasty was performed in patients with unstable angina pectoris 12+/-15 days (median 8) after symptom onset. Patients with unstable angina pectoris were classified retrospectively into Braunwald class I (n=3), class II (n=20), class III (n=28), class B (n=52) and class C (n=12). Follow-up data were obtained from hospital charts, telephone interview and official death certificates where applicable. The study had >80% power to detect a clinically significant 20% difference in survival and a 20% difference in event-free survival between the stable and unstable patient groups.

RESULTS

Despite similar baseline characteristics, early (40-day) mortality was slightly higher in patients with unstable angina (4.7% [3 of 64 patients] vs. 0.8% [1 of 121 patients], p=NS). Long-term outcome was not different, because survival curves were parallel thereafter (10-year survival was 83% for those with stable and 77% for those with unstable angina, p=NS). Survival free of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 10 years was 53% in patients with stable and 47% in patients with unstable angina (p=NS), and survival free of infarction, bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty was 32% for both groups at 10 years. In patients with Braunwald class III unstable angina, 10-year survival was 80%, as compared with 85% in other patients with unstable angina, due to the early hazard (p=NS). Survival and event-free survival were similar in patients who had had a recent myocardial infarction (Braunwald class C) and in patients with acute electrocardiographic changes. Repeat hospital admissions were not more frequent in patients with unstable angina (3.1+/-3.5 vs. 3.0+/-2.6, p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-year survival and event-free survival were similar in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty, with no evidence of an increased rate of recurrent cardiovascular events in the unstable group.

Importance of diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension rather than completeness of revascularization in determining long-term outcome after coronary balloon angioplasty (the LDCMC registry). Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center

The study examined the 10-year outcome in a cohort of 227 unselected, consecutive patients (age 58+/-10 years) undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty between 1984 and 1986 and followed in a single cardiac center (Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center registry). In particular, we sought to identify the relative importance of the systemic risk factors diabetes and hypertension and the extent of coronary disease as opposed to procedure-related technical variables, the immediate success of the procedure, or completeness of revascularization. By life-table analysis (99% follow-up), 94% of the patients were alive at 5 years, and 77% at 10 years after angioplasty. Ten-year survival was reduced in patients with diabetes mellitus (59% vs 83%, p = 0.0008), in patients with previous myocardial infarction (68% vs 85%, p = 0.01), in patients with ejection fraction <50% (55% vs 82%, p = 0.005), and in patients with 3-vessel disease (58% vs 84% and 86% for 1- and 2-vessel disease, respectively, p = 0.04). Diabetes mellitus was the major independent predictor of poor survival (adjusted odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 6.19, p = 0.001). Survival at 10 years was identical in 199 patients in whom angioplasty was complete and in 25 in whom the balloon catheter did not cross the lesion, although bypass surgery was more frequent in the latter group (45% vs 21%, p = 0.001). Incomplete revascularization did not predict poor survival (72% vs 79% with complete angioplasty, p = NS). Event-free survival at 10 years for the whole group was 29%, and 49% of patients survived with no event other than a single repeat angioplasty procedure. Multivessel disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of decreased event-free survival, but incomplete revascularization was not. Thus, long-term outcome after coronary balloon angioplasty was related to diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, and extent of coronary disease, but not to the immediate success of the procedure or completeness of revascularization.

Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated that planned coronary stenting may lower restenosis rate in patients with de novo short lesions. In a prospective study we sought to determine the frequency of restenosis, reocclusion, and adverse cardiovascular events after coronary stenting in a series of 258 consecutive nonselected patients, including those with complex lesions not fulfilling past and ongoing randomized trial criteria for stent implantation.

METHODS

Criteria for stenting were as follows: (1) dissection associated with occlusion or threatened closure, (2) a residual percentage stenosis > 30% or nonocclusive dissection, (3) restenotic lesion or chronic total occlusion.

RESULTS

In most cases (89%) the target lesion had two or more unfavorable morphologic characteristics, whereas only 11% of target lesions could be classified as type A or B1 lesions. Overall, the 6-month restenosis rate was 23%. By use of subgroup analysis restenosis rate was found to range widely, from 11% to 46%. With multivariate analysis, only four variables were found to be independently related to restenosis: age > 63 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.651, p = 0.011), female sex (OR = 3.807, p = 0.002), lesion length > 12 mm (OR 3.185, p = 0.002), and type C lesion (OR 2.527, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from randomized trials on coronary stenting cannot be extrapolated to current clinical practice because most of the treated lesions do not fulfill the criteria adopted in these studies for stent implantation. The restenosis rate is nearly four times greater for long and complex lesions treated by multiple stent implantation as compared with simple lesions, and additional studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of stenting on these lesions.

Smokers undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization present with fewer narrowings in the target coronary artery

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, cigarette smoking remained associated with fewer lesions in the target artery even after adjusting for age, extent of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. These findings support the hypothesis that smokers have less active, yet more active, coronary artery disease.

The continuing debate: conservative or interventional therapy for unstable coronary artery disease

A "look-and-act" approach, using a strategy of early intervention, and a "watchful waiting" approach, using medical therapy, are compared for the management of patients with unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD). Results from clinical trials are used to illustrate the advantages of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy and the problems associated with early intervention. Finally, a clinical management strategy for patients with UCAD is outlined. It is concluded that watchful waiting appears to be the most effective way of managing both patients and resources.

Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Observations from the TIMI IIIB Trial

BACKGROUND

This report describes the results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) IIIB Investigation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PTCA was performed before hospital discharge in 444 of 1473 patients with either unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQWMI) enrolled in TIMI IIIB. Angiographic success was observed in 96.1% of patients. For the entire cohort, the cumulative incidences of death and infarction at 1 year were 2.0% and 8.2%, respectively. The periprocedural incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.7%; emergency coronary bypass surgery, 1.4%; and death, 0.5%. By 1 year of follow-up, 122 patients (28.0%, Kaplan-Meier) had an additional revascularization procedure, 75 (61.5%) had PTCA only, 30 (24.6%) had coronary bypass surgery only, and 17 (13.9%) had both procedures. The results of PTCA were not improved by routine pretreatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (TPA). Periprocedural myocardial infarction was more common among patients receiving TPA than placebo (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; P = .03) and among those with unstable angina than those with NQWMI (OR, 15.5; P = .007). No difference in outcome was observed when patients were analyzed according to age (OR, 1.06; P = .092) or sex (OR, 1.54; P = .51). Variables predictive of poor outcome were PTCA within the first 24 hours of enrollment, PTCA site being the left anterior descending coronary artery, and unsuccessful angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

In TIMI IIIB, PTCA was performed for patients with unstable angina and NQWMI with a very high rate of angiographic success and a low incidence of complications. By 1 year, repeat revascularization was performed in 28.0% of patients. Routine pretreatment with thrombolysis did not enhance outcome.

Relation between estrogen replacement therapy and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to determine the relation between estrogen replacement therapy and the rate of restenosis after coronary angioplasty and atherectomy.

BACKGROUND

Although estrogen replacement therapy in women has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events and improvement in endothelial function, no study has examined whether estrogen reduces restenosis rates after percutaneous coronary interventions.

METHODS

A total of 204 women enrolled in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial with angiographic follow-up were contacted, and their menopausal and estrogen replacement status was determined. Late loss in minimal lumen diameter, late loss index, minimal lumen diameter, rate of restenosis > 50% and actual percent of stenosis were compared in estrogen users and nonusers by quantitative coronary angiography at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Late loss in minimal lumen diameter was significantly less in women using estrogen than in nonusers (-0.13 vs. -0.46 mm, p = 0.01). A regression analysis of the determinants of late loss in minimal lumen diameter revealed that estrogen use was the single most important predictor of subsequent late loss (F = 13.38, p = 0.0006). Formal testing revealed a highly significant interaction between the use of estrogen and intervention (angioplasty or atherectomy). Women undergoing atherectomy who received estrogen had a significantly lower late loss index (0.06 vs. -0.63, p = 0.002), less late loss (0.06 vs. -0.61 mm, p = 0.0006), larger minimal lumen diameter (p = 0.044) and lower restenosis rates (p = 0.038 for > 50% stenosis) than those not using estrogen. In contrast, estrogen had minimal effects on restenosis end points after angioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the potential for estrogen replacement therapy to reduce angiographic measures of restenosis in postmenopausal women after coronary intervention, particularly in those undergoing atherectomy.

Coronary artery stenting: indications and cost implications

The practice of coronary stenting is evolving rapidly, with new stent designs, deployment techniques, and adjunctive therapy. In many respects, clinical practice is changing in advance of the availability of supporting data. The consistent excellent angiographic result with stent deployment exceeds that achieved by any other previous interventional device, and the extent to which this accounts for the exponential increase in stent utilization cannot be accurately determined but is undoubtedly considerable. Controlled randomized trials have confirmed that stent deployment is superior to balloon angioplasty in certain lesion subsets or clinical scenarios. These include focal de novo native vessel lesions, lesions with late recoil after balloon angioplasty, acute closure after balloon angioplasty, and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions. In addition, observational data is persuasive in focal coronary saphenous vein graft lesions and aorto-ostial lesions. On the other hand, the evidence supporting the use of stents strictly to improve on a suboptimal result, possibly the most frequent indication, is indirect and circumstantial. Stents are expensive, but it was anticipated that with the reduction in restenosis not only would they be cost-effective but also ultimately would reduce costs. This hope has not as yet been realized. However, there is little question that the introduction of intracoronary stents has been the most significant and exciting development since the introduction of percutaneous revascularization almost 20 years ago. It has revitalized the field.

Influence of vessel dilatation on restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of vessel dilation on restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on the basis of quantitative angiographic analysis. To have the best comparison possible, we restrospectively studied a homogenous series of patients from the early 1980s treated according to a standardized PTCA procedure. The study group consisted of 86 patients with stable angina pectoris and single-vessel disease, all of whom underwent successful PTCA for a short concentric lesion in proximal vessel parts. The overall restenosis rate was 27%. Angiographically measured balloon size remained below specifications. The size of the inflated balloon at the site of minimal lumen diameter averaged 2.6 +/- 0.5 mm, and nominal balloon size was 3.3 +/- 0.4 mm (p < 0.001). In 22 patients with an oversized balloon (mean balloon/artery ratio 1.1 +/- 0.16) the restenosis rate was 5% compared with 34% in the corresponding group (p = 0.02). Minimal lumen diameters that were similar after the procedure (2.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.3 +/- 0.4, NS) were 2.3 +/- 0.4 mm and 1.8 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively, at follow-up (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed balloon/vessel size ratio (p < 0.001), postprocedure diameter stenosis (p = 0.02), and percentage diameter increase produced by PTCA (p = 0.04) as independent correlates of the late outcome. Postangioplasty minimal lumen diameter was not related to restenosis. The strongest and most significant predictor of late PTCA outcome both by univariate and multivariate analysis was balloon/vessel size ratio, especially when balloon expansion at the site of minimal lumen diameter was regarded. In patients with continued success at follow-up, the ratio was 0.81 +/- 0.15 compared with 0.60 +/- 0.11 in patients with restenosis (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that the late angiographic outcome of PTCA is strongly influenced by procedural factors. It appears that in a selected group of patients, an increased balloon/artery ratio, supposedly associated with increased vessel wall stretch, favorably affects the restenosis process.

Relation of coronary angioscopic findings at coronary angioplasty to angiographic restenosis

BACKGROUND

Discordant results have been reported regarding morphological predictors of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). These discrepancies may be related to the limitations of angiography in the study of plaque morphology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 117 consecutive patients who underwent successful PTCA and who underwent coronary angioscopy before and immediately after the procedure. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 99 (85%) patients. We analyzed the relationship between angioscopic variables at the time of PTCA and the occurrence of restenosis assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Plaque shape and color had no effect on late loss in luminal diameter (late loss: smooth lesions, 0.55 +/- 0.68 mm; complex lesions, 0.76 +/- 0.60 mm; white plaques, 0.51 +/- 0.56 mm; yellow plaques, 0.65 +/- 0.72 mm; P = NS). An angioscopic protruding thrombus at the PTCA site was associated with significantly greater loss in luminal diameter (late loss: no thrombus, 0.47 +/- 0.54 mm; lining thrombus, 0.59 +/- 0.67 mm; protruding thrombus, 1.07 +/- 0.77 mm; P < .05). Dissection assessed by angioscopy immediately after PTCA had no effect on late loss in luminal diameter (late loss: no dissection, 0.60 +/- 0.60 mm; simple dissection, 0.82 +/- 0.75 mm; complex dissection, 0.57 +/- 0.80 mm; P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that coronary angioscopy may be helpful in predicting the risk of restenosis after PTCA. The high rate of angiographic recurrence observed when PTCA is performed at thrombus-containing lesions supports a role for thrombus in the process of luminal renarrowing after PTCA.

Local lesion-related factors and restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Evidence from a quantitative angiographic study in patients with unstable angina undergoing double-vessel angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Restenosis rates are high when coronary angioplasty is performed in patients with unstable angina. The relative contributions of local and systemic factors to this excess risk of restenosis are unclear. To assess these, we compared changes in minimal lumen diameter and the incidence of restenosis, determined by quantitative coronary angiography, after coronary angioplasty at culprit and nonculprit lesions dilated in the course of a single procedure in patients with unstable angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 67 consecutive patients with unstable angina in whom two lesions, in different vessels, were dilated during the same procedure. Lesions were designated as culprit or nonculprit on the basis of the location of ECG changes during chest pain combined with assessment of the angiographic characteristics of the lesions. With these criteria, 43 patients had identifiable culprit lesions. Stenosis severity before and immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up was assessed with quantitative angiography. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 91% (39 patients) of this subgroup. Culprit lesions were more severe (P < .02) than nonculprit lesions. The late loss at culprit lesions (0.87 +/- 0.75 mm) was significantly (P < .01) greater than the equivalent value for nonculprit lesions (0.33 +/- 0.69 mm). With a categorical definition (> 50% stenosis at follow-up), restenosis occurred at 67% of culprit lesions and at 32% of nonculprit lesions (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater loss in minimal lumen diameter and the consequent higher rate of restenosis at culprit compared with nonculprit lesions suggest that local "lesion-related" factors are an important determinant of the high rate of restenosis when coronary angioplasty is performed in patients with unstable angina.

Effect of high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis: final results of the MARCATOR Study, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cilazapril. The Multicenter American Research Trial With Cilazapril After Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis (MARCATOR) Study Group

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of low and high dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril on angiographic restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors possess antiproliferative effects in animal models of vascular injury. However, a recent clinical trial using low dose cilazapril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, failed to prevent restenosis.

METHODS

Patients received either cilazapril (1 or 2.5 mg in the evening after successful coronary angioplasty, then 1, 5 or 10 mg twice daily for 6 months) or matched placebo. All patients received aspirin for 6 months. Coronary angiograms before and after angioplasty and at 6-month follow-up were quantitatively analyzed. In addition, the clinical, procedural and angiographic factors associated with restenosis were determined with the use of stepwise logistic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,436 patients with a successful coronary angioplasty were recruited. As assessed by an intention-to-treat analysis, the mean difference in minimal coronary lumen diameter (mean +/- 1 SD) between the postangioplasty and follow-up angiogram at 6 months (primary end point) was -0.35 +/- 0.51 for the placebo group and -0.37 +/- 0.52, -0.45 +/- 0.52 and -0.412 +/- 0.53, respectively, for the 1-, 5- and 10-mg twice daily cilazapril groups (p = NS). Clinical events during follow-up did not differ among the four study groups. Multivariate analysis revealed only six variables as independent predictors of the loss of minimal lumen diameter: duration of angina < 6 months, history of myocardial infarction, minimal lumen diameter before and after angioplasty as well as a proximal lesion location and reference diameters. Traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis did not relate to restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril in high as well as low dosages does not prevent restenosis and does not favorably influence the overall clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary angioplasty. Few factors are predictive of restenosis.

Comparison of results of intracoronary stenting in patients with unstable vs. stable angina

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has higher complication and restenosis rates when performed in the setting of unstable angina. Balloon-expandable intracoronary stenting is a new technique with the potential to improve the results of PTCA. In order to determine whether stenting is associated with a poorer outcome in patients with unstable angina, we retrospectively examined our experience with the Palmaz-Schatz balloon-expandable intracoronary stent in 105 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of symptoms at the time of stent insertion: group I (n = 57) had stable angina pectoris, and group II (n = 48) had unstable angina defined as pain at rest despite antianginal therapy (Braunwald class II, III). Initial (30-d) and final (6-mo) success rates were defined as stent insertion without myocardial infarction, need for bypass surgery, death, and significant angina. Baseline characteristics were similar, although the patients with unstable symptoms were older, more likely to be female, and had a higher incidence of postinfarction angina. A total of 136 stents were successfully delivered to 97 target sites in 92% of patients. Major complications occurred in 4 patients (4%) and were due to subacute thrombosis in 3 of them. There were no differences in complication rates between patients receiving stents electively with stable vs. unstable symptoms (2% vs. 6%, p = NS). Six-mo. follow-up status was ascertained in 96% of patients and revealed overall clinical success in 83% with angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% stenosis) in 28% of patients. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of restenosis, follow-up angina class, or overall clinical success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Smooth muscle cell abundance and fibroblast growth factors in coronary lesions of patients with nonfatal unstable angina. A clue to the mechanism of transformation from the stable to the unstable clinical state

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms responsible for the transformation of stable angina to unstable angina, a major cause of morbidity and mortality, are commonly believed to be plaque rupture and thrombosis. We determined whether additional mechanisms are operative by analyzing the histopathology and immuno-histopathology of coronary plaques retrieved by directional atherectomy of patients with unstable angina in whom no intraluminal thrombus was demonstrated by angiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The histological findings of atherectomy specimens from 34 patients with unstable angina were compared with those of 24 patients with postangioplasty restenosis, whose lesions are known to be composed of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and 10 patients with stable angina, whose lesions contain relatively few SMCs. We also studied the expression of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors (aFGF and bFGF), whose role in the vascular response to injury has been established. Specimens from unstable angina resembled those from postangioplasty restenosis in regard to SMC abundance (scale, 0 to 3; 1.4 +/- 0.9 versus 1.7 +/- 0.9; P = NS), and both differed from those of stable angina. Thrombus and/or hemorrhage occurred in only 34% of patients with unstable angina (compared with 8% of restenosis patients and in none of stable angina patients). Active lesions (defined as lesions (defined as lesions containing one or more of the following: thrombus, hemorrhage, abundant and disorganized SMCs in the presence of loose connective tissue, or inflammatory infiltrate) were observed in 56% of the unstable angina patients and in 50% of the restenosis patients but in none of the stable angina patients. The expression of aFGF and bFGF was detected in 80% to 100% of unstable angina (n = 11) and restenosis (n = 10) specimens but in only 1 of 5 stable angina specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic evidence of thrombosis and plaque rupture occurred in only one third of unstable angina patients, selected because they had no angiographic evidence of intracoronary thrombus. Moreover, their lesions resembled those of restenosis patients in regard to SMC abundance, lesion activity, and the expression of aFGF and bFGF. Our findings therefore suggest that an alternative mechanism to plaque rupture and thrombus formation may be operative in the precipitation of unstable angina; namely, in a subset of patients, SMC proliferation may lead to gradual plaque expansion and thereby to lumenal narrowing and unstable angina. Our data also suggest a role for aFGF and bFGF in this process.

Luminal narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A study of clinical, procedural, and lesional factors related to long-term angiographic outcome. Coronary Artery Restenosis Prevention on Repeated Thromboxane Antagonism (CARPORT) Study Group

BACKGROUND

The renarrowing process after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is now believed to be caused by a response-to-injury vessel wall reaction. The magnitude of this process can be assessed by the change in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at follow-up angiography. The aim of the present study was to find independent patient-related, lesion-related, and procedure-related risk factors for this luminal narrowing process. A model that accurately predicts the amount of luminal narrowing could be an aid in patient or lesion selection for the procedure, and it could improve assessment of medium-term (6 months) prognosis. Modification or control of the identified risk factors could reduce overall restenosis rates, and it could assist in the selection of patients at risk for a large loss in lumen diameter. This population could then constitute the target population for pharmacological intervention studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Quantitative angiography was performed on 666 successfully dilated lesions at angioplasty and at 6-month follow-up. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to obtain variables with an independent contribution to the prediction of the absolute change in minimal lumen diameter. Diabetes mellitus, duration of angina < 2.3 months, gain in MLD at angioplasty, pre-PTCA MLD, lesion length > or = 6.8 mm, and thrombus after PTCA were independently predictive of change in MLD. Overall prediction of the model was poor, however, percentage-correct classification for a predicted change between -0.1 to -0.4 mm was approximately 10%. Lesions showing no change or regression (change > -0.1 mm) and lesions showing large progression (< or = -0.4 mm) were more predictable (correct classification, 59.5% and 49.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Renarrowing after successful PTCA as determined with contrast angiography is a process that cannot be accurately predicted by simple clinical, morphological, and lesion characteristics.

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Coronary angioplasty is used to treat coronary disease in many patients. Indications for angioplasty have expanded since it was first performed, mainly as a result of improvement in equipment and techniques. One problem with coronary angioplasty is the phenomenon of renarrowing of the treated coronary lesion, a process called restenosis. The events that constitute restenosis appear to be a universal response to the arterial wall injury of angioplasty. They are currently characterized as follows: platelet adhesion and aggregation on the damaged endothelium and within deep splits into the tunica media; release of platelet-derived growth factors; inflammation of the mechanically injured medial zone; transformation of smooth muscle cells of the tunica media after their activation by several of the growth-promoting substances; migration and proliferation of transformed smooth muscle cells, with secretion of copious amounts of extracellular matrix material; and, finally, termination of the growth process with regrowth of endothelium over the injured area. A decade of research work has helped identify clinical correlates of restenosis after coronary angioplasty procedures. This work is hindered by lack of a uniform angiographic definition of restenosis. In addition, much of the information has come from small studies, with incomplete follow-up and retrospective orientation. Nevertheless, some data are available. Patient-related correlates include male gender, unstable angina, diabetes, and continued smoking after angioplasty. Lesion-related correlates include multilesional and multivessel procedures, higher postangioplasty residual stenosis, proximal vessel location, location in the left anterior descending artery, location in a vein graft, long lesions, and total occlusions. The only consistent procedure-related correlate has been incorrect sizing of the angioplasty balloon to the treated artery. For the purposes of individual patient care, clinical correlates are not helpful. No group of variables has been found to be associated with complete freedom from restenosis, and no group is completely predictive of restenosis. All patients undergoing angioplasty procedures require some follow-up through subsequent months and years. Symptom status and the results of noninvasive studies have been investigated for purposes of follow-up. Symptoms are virtually useless by themselves for predicting restenosis or its absence. When symptom status is combined with exercise thallium 201 scintigraphy performed 4 to 6 months after an angioplasty procedure, the two factors are less than ideal but have a negative predictive value of more than 90%. This means that more than 90% of patients who have neither symptoms nor evidence of ischemia by thallium 201 scintigraphy will not have angiographic restenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase and angioplasty versus lone angioplasty therapy of acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The value of routine administration of intravenous thrombolytic agents during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) therapy of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has not been determined. Therefore, we prospectively randomized 122 patients with evolving MI to PTCA therapy with or without adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with ECG ST segment elevation who presented within 4 hours of symptom onset, had no contraindication to thrombolytic therapy, and were not in cardiogenic shock were enrolled. They were treated immediately with intravenous heparin (10,000 units) and oral aspirin (325 mg) and randomized to treatment with placebo or streptokinase (1.5 M units) administered intravenously over 30 minutes. Patients then were taken immediately to the catheterization laboratory, and those with suitable coronary anatomy underwent immediate PTCA. Subsequent clinical course, serial radionuclide ventriculography, and 6-month repeat angiography were analyzed. A total of 106 patients were treated with PTCA. Use of PTCA was similar for placebo (92%) and streptokinase (83%) groups. Angioplasty was successful in 95% of patients, with no difference in placebo (93%) and streptokinase (98%) groups. Serial radionuclide ventriculography demonstrated no difference in 24-hour (52 +/- 12% versus 50 +/- 12%) or 6-week (51 +/- 12% versus 51 +/- 13%) ejection fraction values for placebo and streptokinase groups, respectively. Contrast ventriculography demonstrated improvement in immediate (54 +/- 12%) versus 6-month (60 +/- 15%, p < 0.05) values for the overall group. No differences in 6-month values were present (58 +/- 15% versus 62 +/- 15%, p = NS) for placebo and streptokinase groups, respectively. Coronary angiography was performed in 75% of the 90 patients eligible for restudy. Arterial patency was 87% at 6 months, and coronary restenosis was present in 38% of patients. No differences in chronic patency or restenosis were detected for the two treatment groups. Although adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy did not improve outcome, it did complicate the hospital course. Hospitalization was longer (9.3 +/- 5.0 versus 7.7 +/- 4.4 days, p = 0.046) and more costly ($25,191 +/- 15,368 versus $19,643 +/- 7,250, p < 0.02). Transfusion rate was higher (39% versus 8%, p = 0.0001) and need for emergency coronary bypass surgery was greater (10.3% versus 1.6%, p = 0.03) for the streptokinase-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy does not enhance early preservation of ventricular function, improve arterial patency rates, or lower restenosis rates after PTCA therapy of acute MI. Hospital course is longer, more expensive, and more complicated. For these reasons, PTCA therapy of acute MI should not be routinely performed with adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy.

Aggressive clinical pattern of angina at restenosis following coronary angioplasty in unstable angina

The frequency, clinical pattern, and timing of recurrent angina following successful single-lesion percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was assessed in a consecutive group of 104 patients with stable angina and in 85 with unstable angina. In addition, the relationship between lesion morphology and angiographic features and the pattern of recurrent angina was determined. Restenosis, defined as recurrence of symptoms with > 50% stenosis at the site of PTCA, occurred in 25 (24%) of the stable group and in 23 (27%) of the unstable group (p = NS). The pattern of angina at repeat presentation was aggressive in nature in 8% of the stable group and in 48% of the unstable group (p = 0.002). The time interval between the recurrence of symptoms and repeat coronary angiogram or PTCA was longer in the nonaggressive group than in the aggressive group, 16 +/- 12.1 and 5 +/- 6.8 weeks, respectively (p < 0.003). The key factors predicting the recurrent angina pattern identified by multiple logistic regression analysis were the angina status pre-PTCA (p = 0.001) and the presence of double-vessel disease (p = 0.01). An aggressive pattern of angina at the time of restenosis is frequent in patients with unstable angina at the time of PTCA, and close post-PTCA surveillance is necessary in these patients.

Ischemia: reperfusion injury and restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a very effective technology that allows, without surgery, successful mechanical revascularization of acutely or chronically obstructed coronary arteries. The success of PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina is questioned by early coronary reocclusion and by so-called reperfusion injury. In a biochemical context, reperfusion injury occurs as a very complex interaction between the different tissues that build heart muscle. Free radicals play a pivotal role and initiate a deleterious cascade of events after reperfusion. Protective mechanisms such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase are normally present in the cell to prevent damage by free radicals. Endothelial cells have a greater number of specific physiologic and metabolic functions and influence the microcirculatory flow. In the presence of exogenous glucose, coronary endothelial cells show a pronounced lactate production under well-oxygenated conditions. Low energy demand and high glycolytic activity may be the cause of why the coronary endothelium is less severely injured than the cardiomyocytes in the ischemic and anoxic heart. The success of PTCA in patients with chronically obstructed coronary arteries (stable angina) is questioned by vessel occlusion and restenosis. Restenosis is a very complex process involving clinical, morphological, procedural, regional flow-dependent, and biological determinants. Early platelet deposition, formation of mural thrombus, coronary vasospasm, and elastic recoil forces of stretched vessel wall may contribute to early restenosis in the first days after PTCA, but the peak incidence of restenosis occurs between two and three months after PTCA. Intimal hyperplasia or proliferation of smooth muscle cells is believed to be the fundamental process of restenosis. To solve the problem of restenosis, much effort has been expended, which includes several technical and pharmacological approaches. Pharmacological strategies, systemically or locally administered, aim at increased vasomotor tone, platelet function, smooth muscle cell proliferation/migration, and fibrocollagenous healing. Up to now none of the proposed drugs has been able to reduce the restenosis rate. There is experimental evidence for a claim that the antioxidant functions of vitamins (E, C, and beta-carotene) may prevent restenosis post-PTCA. Until recently, in most post-PTCA restenosis trials the angiographic analyses were not performed using computerized measurement methods. In order to assess the efficacy of acute or long-term interventions on the natural course or acute complications of coronary artery disease, quantitative measures have been introduced and validated that make use of digital coronary angiography and computerized image processing techniques.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical, physiologic, anatomic and procedural factors predictive of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

In a recent prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, a combination of aspirin and dipyridamole was not associated with a reduction in the rate of restenosis within the 1st 6 months after coronary angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinical, anatomic or procedural factors were predictive of the observed restenosis rates in that prospective trial. A total of 247 patients and 280 segments underwent follow-up angiography and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis between 4 and 7 months after coronary angioplasty. Two baseline clinical characteristics--angina class and duration of angina in months--were related to the rate of restenosis by univariate analysis. Patient-related stepwise logistic regression analysis identified severity of angina as the only clinical predictor of restenosis. Three univariate baseline anatomic characteristics--percent diameter stenosis before angioplasty, stenosis greater than 10 mm in length and calcific stenosis--and two early postangioplasty characteristics--residual percent diameter stenosis and residual mean pressure gradient--were predictive of restenosis. Of these, only two--length of stenosis and residual percent diameter stenosis--were independently related to restenosis by multivariate analysis and only the former is identifiable before the procedure. It is concluded that in prospective studies in contrast to retrospective studies, few clinical and anatomic factors appear to be predictive of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: an overview

Despite substantial basic and clinical efforts to address the problem of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, effective preventive therapies have not yet been developed. Nevertheless, the accumulated information has provided much insight into the process of restenosis in addition to allowing standards to be developed for adequate clinical trials. The pathophysiology of restenosis increasingly appears to be distinct from that of primary atherosclerosis. Restenosis involves elastic recoil, incorporation of thrombus into the lesion and fibrocellular proliferation in varying degrees in different patients. Lack of an animal model that satisfactorily mimics restenosis is a major impediment to further understanding of the process. Clinical studies are hampered by difficulties in finding a single unifying definition of restenosis and by variable methods of reporting follow-up. Reporting of clinical outcomes of all patients in angiographic substudies would allow a more satisfactory interpretation of the results of clinical trials. Current noninvasive test results are not accurate enough to substitute for angiographic and clinical outcome data in intervention trials. In the majority of observational studies, only diabetes and unstable angina have emerged as consistently associated with restenosis; whereas most of the standard risk factors for atherosclerosis have a less consistent relation. Disappointingly, the new atherectomy and laser technologies have not affected restenosis rates. The one possible exception is coronary stenting, as a result of the larger luminal diameter achieved by the placement of the stent. In conclusion, although substantial continued effort is necessary to explore the basic aspects of cellular proliferation and mechanical alteration of atherosclerotic vessels, attention to the principles of clinical trials and observation are required to detect the impact of risk factors and interventions on the multifactorial problem of restenosis. Adequate sample sizes, collection of clinical and angiographic outcomes and factorial study designs hold promise for unraveling this important limitation of percutaneous intervention.

Short-term and long-term benefits of coronary angioplasty in unstable angina pectoris

Primary coronary angioplasty was attempted in 288 patients (206 men and 82 women) who presented with stable (50%) or unstable (50%) angina pectoris. The success rates of angioplasty and the subsequent revascularization requirements in these two angina categories were compared during a one year prospective follow-up. The site and distribution of coronary artery stenoses did not differ between the categories. Three hundred and five dilatations were attempted (149 in 144 patients with unstable angina and 156 in 144 patients with stable angina). Of these procedures, 265 (87%) were technically successful--133 (89%) in 128 patients with unstable angina and 132 (85%) in 120 patients with stable angina. Lower success rates were achieved in 29 attempted dilatations of vessels with chronic total occlusion (19 successful [66%], P = 0.002) and in 19 patients who presented with unstable angina after recent (within two weeks) infarction (10 patients with successful angioplasty, [53%], P less than 0.0001). Subsequent revascularization requirements after an initially successful angioplasty in 57 patients were greater in unstable (36 patients) than in stable angina (21 patients; P = 0.05) and reflected the greater frequency of repeat angioplasty in patients with unstable angina (22 patients) compared with those with stable angina (10 patients; P = 0.04) among patients with recurrent symptoms. At one year, 245 patients (85%)-121 treated for unstable angina and 124 treated for stable angina--experienced no angina during normal daily activities. We conclude that a primary angioplasty success rate of 89% can be achieved in patients with unstable angina pectoris but this rate is significantly lower in patients presenting after recent infarction. Repeat angioplasty for recurrent symptoms after a successful primary procedure is required more frequently in patients presenting with unstable angina.