Issues surrounding a local cardiac renin system and the beneficial actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in ischemic myocardium

Cardioprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease

Clinical and experiments study with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors suggest that these agents may improve coronary artery disease by acting at multiple sites in the series of events leading to end-stage heart disease. These agents reduce blood pressure, improve prognosis and symptoms in patients with severe heart failure and in patients after acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction. They are useful in the early, acute phase of myocardial infarction. More recently, ACE inhibitors have been shown to reduce in vitro vascular hypertrophy, to attenuate arteriosclerosis, and to maintain endothelium function. Whether these effects occur at clinical levels is still uncertain. The exciting clinical data have led to the proposal that alteration of ACE activity, particularly in tissue, is an important factor in development and progression of CAD. The ACE system is complex, with endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine effects. ACE is present in cardiac and vascular tissue. Therefore, the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors can be classified as "cardio" and "vasculo" protective. This article summarizes a number of independent and complementary mechanisms pointing to a role of ACE and ACE inhibition in coronary artery disease.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: an overview

There are multiple mechanisms whereby ACE inhibitors could be beneficial during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion, including: i) reduced formation of angiotensin II, ii) decreased metabolism of bradykinin, iii) antioxidant activity, and iv) possibly other unknown mechanisms. Reduced formation of angiotensin II should be beneficial because this peptide exerts several actions that are potentially detrimental to the ischemic/reperfused myocardium, including vasoconstriction, increased release of norepinephrine, stimulation of phospholipase C and/or A2, and increased afterload with an attendant increase in oxygen demands. Reduced metabolism of bradykinin could be beneficial by increasing myocardial glucose uptake, by causing vasodilation, and by stimulating production of endothelium-derived relaxing factor and prostacyclin. Although earlier studies suggested that sulfhydryl-containing ACE inhibitors scavenge superoxide anions, recent data have shown that these drugs scavenge hydroxyl radical and hypochlorous acid with no effect on superoxide anion. Studies in isolated hearts have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors attenuate the metabolic, arrhythmic, and contractile dearrangements associated with ischemia and reperfusion, and have suggested that such beneficial effects are mediated by potentiation of bradykinin and/or increased synthesis of prostacyclin. Studies in models of myocardial stunning after brief (15-min) ischemia in vivo (anesthetized dogs) suggest that ACE inhibitors enhance the recovery of contractile function after a single brief ischemic episode. No data are available regarding the effect of these drugs on myocardial stunning after a prolonged, partly reversible episode, after multiple consecutive brief ischemic episodes, and after global ischemia. The mechanism for the salutary effects of ACE inhibitors on stunning remains a mystery. It may involve an antioxidant action (in the case of thiol-containing molecules) or potentiation of prostaglandins (in the case of non-thiol-containing molecules). What is clear is that the enhanced recovery of function effected by these drugs is not due to hemodynamic effects, inhibition of the converting enzyme per se, or an "antischemic" action (since the drugs were effective when given at the time of reperfusion). The effects of ACE inhibitors on myocardial infarct size remain controversial. Further studies will be necessary to conclusively establish whether ACE inhibitors can protect against the detrimental effects of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Nevertheless, the evidence provided thus far is encouraging and warrants an in-depth assessment of the role of these drugs in attenuating myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

GISSI-3 study protocol on the effects of lisinopril, of nitrates, and of their association in patients with acute myocardial infarction

The role of thrombolysis in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI) has been definitely established in terms of mortality and ventricular function, as has the equivalence of different thrombolytic agents. The Second Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2) trial showed that a large number of patients have either clinical heart failure or severe left ventricular damage on discharge from the hospital, with a large risk of death and poor prospects in terms of quality of life. Additional measures to limit ventricular damage are therefore essential to reducing morbidity. The GISSI-3 study protocol on the effects of lisinopril and nitrates, used alone or in combination, in patients with AMI is described in detail.

Effects of captopril on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after acute myocardial infarction

The left ventricle progressively dilates in some patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Both systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction can be of significance in the development of heart failure. Captopril has been shown to prevent dilatation, but the effect on LV diastolic function is unknown. In a placebo-controlled double-blind parallel study, 58 AMI patients with heart failure or low ejection fraction, or both, were consecutively randomized at day 7 to either placebo or captopril (25 mg twice daily). No differences were present between the groups at baseline. Fifty-three patients completed the 6-month study period. Both LV diastolic and systolic volume indexes increased significantly in the placebo group (17 and 14%, respectively); in the captopril group there was no change in LV diastolic volume index, but a 13% reduction in LV systolic volume index. Ejection fraction increased significantly in the captopril group. The peak flow velocities of the early and atrial filling phases were measured, and the ratio between the velocities was calculated. A significant reduction was observed during the study period in early peak flow velocity (65 to 52 cm/s) and in the ratio between early and atrial peak flow velocity (1.3 to 0.8) in the placebo group (p less than 0.05), but no significant changes occurred in the captopril group. No correlation was found between dilatation of the left ventricle and reduction in early peak flow velocity or the ratio between early and atrial peak flow velocity. In conclusion, captopril prevented LV dilatation, improved ejection fraction and prevented LV diastolic dysfunction in AMI patients with early signs of LV systolic dysfunction.

Adjunctive use of beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium antagonists and other therapies in coronary thrombolysis

The availability of thrombolytic agents for use in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction is an important step in the management of a common, often debilitating, and potentially lethal disorder. However, despite the proven benefits of coronary thrombolysis, the importance of adjunctive treatment modalities is being increasingly recognized. Beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium antagonists, nitrates, magnesium, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors each exert favorable cardiovascular properties that may offer additional benefits. Clinical trials combining thrombolytic and adjunctive pharmacologic agents offer hope for further advances in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.