Usefulness of excitable gap and pattern of resetting in atrial flutter for determining reentry circuit location

Variations in duration and composition of the excitable gap around the tricuspid annulus during typical atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Differences in the duration of the excitable gap along the reentry circuit during typical atrial flutter are poorly known.

AIM

To prospectively evaluate and compare the duration and composition of the excitable gap during typical counterclockwise atrial flutter in different parts of the circuit all around the tricuspid annulus.

METHODS

The excitable gap was determined by introducing a premature stimulus at various sites around the tricuspid annulus during typical counterclockwise atrial flutter in 34 patients. Excitable gap was calculated as the difference between the longest resetting coupling interval and the effective atrial refractory period.

RESULTS

The duration of the excitable gap, the effective atrial refractory period and the resetting coupling interval differed significantly along the tricuspid annulus. Duration of excitable gap was significantly longer at the low lateral right atrium (79±22 ms) than at the cavotricuspid isthmus (66±23 ms; P=0.002). The effective atrial refractory period was significantly longer at the cavotricuspid isthmus (160±26 ms) than at the high lateral right atrium (149±29 ms; P=0.004). Other locations, such as coronary sinus ostium, right atrial septum and atrial roof displayed intermediate values.

CONCLUSION

The duration of the excitable gap differed significantly along the tricuspid annulus, with a larger excitable gap at the lateral right atrium and a shorter excitable gap at the cavotricuspid isthmus, because of longer refractory periods at the isthmus.

Assessment of clockwise cavotricuspid isthmus block based on conduction times during transient entrainment: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

In typical counterclockwise atrial flutter (AFL), the route of impulse propagation to anteroinferior right atrium (AIRA) during transient entrainment (TE) from the coronary sinus (CS) is expected to be similar to that during pacing from the same CS site during sinus rhythm (SR) when cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block has occurred. This could be used to identify CTI block during ablation procedures.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with AFL (cycle length [CL], 240 +/- 25 ms) underwent CTI ablation during AFL. CS pacing was performed at a CL of 20 ms less than AFL CL before ablation (n = 36), and at several CL during SR with conduction through the CTI (n = 21) and after CTI block (n = 36).

RESULTS

TE with orthodromic activation of AIRA occurred in all 36 patients. Conduction time from CS to AIRA during TE (T-entr, 199 +/- 29 ms) was significantly longer than during pacing in SR (T-CTI) at the same rate not only with CTI conduction (T-CTI-C, 135 +/- 24 ms, P < 0.001), but also with CTI block (T-CTI-B, 186 +/- 24 ms, P < 0.01). T-entr did not correlate with T-CTI-C, but there was an excellent correlation between T-entr and T-CTI-B (r = 0.874, P < 0.001). A "TE index" that corrected T-CTI for individual T-entr identified CTI block with 97% sensitivity and 91% specificity. T-CTI at low rates differed from T-CTI at high rates but correlated significantly with them.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of conduction times during TE from the CS and during pacing from the same site and rate in SR can help to establish whether clockwise CTI block has been achieved in patients with typical AFL.

Electrophysiological mechanisms of atrial flutter

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Several experimental models, such as tricuspid regurgitation model, tricuspid ring model, sterile pericarditis model and atrial crush injury model, have provided important information about reentrant circuit and can test the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs. Human AFL has typical and atypical forms. Typical AFL rotates around the tricuspid annulus and uses the crista terminalis and sometimes sinus venosa as the boundary. The tricuspid isthmus is a slow conduction zone and the target of radiofrequency ablation. Atypical AFL may arise from the right or left atrium. Right AFL includes upper loop reentry, free wall reentry and figure-of-8 reentry. Left AFL includes mitral annular AFL, pulmonary vein-related AFL and left septal AFL. Radiofrequency ablation of the isthmus between the boundaries can eliminate these arrhythmias.

Alternans amplification following a two-stimulus protocol in a one-dimensional cardiac ionic model of reentry: from annihilation to double-wave quasiperiodic reentry

Electrical pacing is a common procedure in both experimental and clinical settings to study and/or annihilate anatomical reentry. A previous study [Comtois and Vinet, Chaos 12, 903 (2002)] has described new ways to terminate reentry in a one-dimensional loop model by a protocol consisting of only two stimulations. Annihilation of the reentrant activity was much more likely with these new scenarios than through a unidirectional block. This paper investigates the sensitivity of these scenarios of annihilation to the length of the pathway. It shows that double-pulse stimulation can stop the reentry if the circuit is shorter than a limiting length. Beyond this upper limit, stimulation rather yields sustained double-wave reentry. The same dynamical mechanism, labeled alternans amplification, is found to be responsible for these two types of post-stimulus dynamics.

Tachycardia circuit in typical atrial flutter: the role of a posterolateral line of block in the perpetuation of the tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The essential boundaries in typical atrial flutter (AF) are unknown.

METHODS

To examine the role of the tricuspid annulus (TA) and posterolateral line of block (LB) in maintaining AF, single extrastimuli were delivered during AF both around the LB and the TA in 29 patients. Single extrastimuli were delivered from the superior, middle, and inferior third of the anterior LB, superior, middle, and inferior third of the posterior LB, and the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA. The longest coupling interval (LCI) of single extrastimuli that reset AF and subsequent return cycle (RC) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The resetting response showed two patterns (groups 1 and 2). The differences between the AF cycle length (AFCL) and the LCI (AFCL-LCI) at the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA were the shortest, and were significantly shorter than those at the other sites (P < 0.0001) in group 1. However, the AFCL-LCI at the superior, middle, and inferior third of the anterior LB, and the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA were the shortest, and were significantly shorter than those at the other sites (P < 0.0001) in group 2. The difference between the RC and the AFCL exhibited the same two patterns, similar to the AFCL-LCI. In group 1, a single extrastimulus produced an artificial conduction across the LB, but AF was not reset.

CONCLUSIONS

Two types of reentry circuits exist in AF; one has its essential reentry circuit confined to the TA and thus the LB acts as a bystander, while the LB and the TA are essential boundaries in the other one.

Resetting and annihilation of reentrant activity in a model of a one-dimensional loop of ventricular tissue

Resetting and annihilation of reentrant activity by a single stimulus pulse (S1) or a pair (S1-S2) of coupled pulses are studied in a model of one-dimensional loop of cardiac tissue using a Beeler-Reuter-type ionic model. Different modes of reentry termination are described. The classical mode of termination by unidirectional block, in which a stimulus produces only a retrograde front that collides with the activation front of the reentry, can be obtained for both S1 and S1-S2 applied over a small vulnerable window. We demonstrate that another scenario of termination-that we term collision block-can also be induced by the S1-S2 protocol. This scenario is obtained over a much wider range of S1-S2 coupling intervals than the one leading to a unidirectional block. In the collision block, S1 produces a retrograde front, colliding with the activation front of the pre-existing reentry, and an antegrade front propagating in the same direction as the initial reentry. Then, S2 also produces an antegrade and a retrograde front. However, the propagation of these fronts in the spatial profile of repolarization left by S1 leads to a termination of the reentrant activity. More complex behaviors also occur in which the antegrade fronts produced by S1 and S2 both persist for several turns, displaying a growing alternation in action potential duration ("alternans amplification") that may lead to the termination of the reentrant activity. The hypothesis that both collision block and alternans amplification depend on the interaction between the action potential duration restitution curve and the recovery curve of conduction velocity is supported by the fact that the dynamical behaviors were reproduced using an integro-delay equation based on these two properties. We thus describe two new mechanisms (collision block and alternans amplification) whereby electrical stimulation can terminate reentrant activity. (c) 2002 American Institute of Physics.

Demonstration of the exact anatomic tachycardia circuit in the fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The tachycardia circuit in the fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (FS-AVNRT) has not been convincingly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To define the tachycardia circuit, single extrastimuli were delivered during FS-AVNRT to 9 intra-atrial sites in 12 patients: the His bundle (HB) site; the superior portion of the HB site (S-HB); 3 arbitrarily divided sites on the AV junction extending from the HB site to the coronary sinus ostium (CSOS) (sites S, M, and I); the superior, posterior, and posteroinferior portions of the CSOS (S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS, respectively); and the CSOS. The inferior portion of coronary sinus ostium (I-CSOS), at which the earliest retrograde activation was observed, was excluded. At each site, the longest coupling interval of the single extrastimulus that reset the tachycardia and the subsequent return cycle was measured. The mean tachycardia cycle length was 370+/-55 ms. The longest coupling intervals at sites S-HB, HB, S, M, I, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were 328+/-53, 360+/-55, 358+/-55, 358+/-54, 360+/-55, 338+/-56, 323+/-54, 331+/-56, and 321+/-58 ms, respectively, and the subsequent return cycles were 408+/-58, 371+/-55, 370+/-55, 372+/-56, 370+/-55, 396+/-56, 411+/-60, 405+/-58, and 412+/-59 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at sites HB, S, M, and I were longer than those at S-HB, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS (P<0.0001). The return cycles at sites HB, S, M, and I did not differ from the tachycardia cycle length, whereas those at CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were longer than the tachycardia cycle length (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The perinodal atrium extending from the HB site to the I-CSOS is an integral limb of the reentry circuit in FS-AVNRT.

Influence of propafenone on resetting and termination of canine atrial flutter

Previous studies on atrial flutter (AF) presumed that resetting was due to the prematurity effect (PE) in which the stimulated antegrade wavefront travels in the tail of the AF preexisting wavefront. We studied the collision effect (CE) between the AF and the stimulated retrograde wavefronts, its contribution to resetting, and its relationship to AF termination and how they are affected by the Class IC agent propafenone (PPF). A canine model of AF was created using a Y-shaped lesion in the right atrium in 14 dogs (33 +/- 3 kg). Five atrial bipolar electrodes were positioned around the tricuspid valve. In a subsequent set of 11 dogs, we used 16 bipolar electrodes for recording. AF was induced by burst pacing. Single and multiple stimuli were applied to measure conduction time and reset-response curves (RRCs). This was repeated after the administration of PPF (1 mg/kg loading dose for 10 minutes, followed by 1.8 mg/kg/per hour infusion). Three distinct mechanisms were found to contribute to the RRC: the PE, the CE, and heterogeneity. PPF stabilized the RRC, increased significantly the cycle length (CL), the duration of the effective refractory period, as well as the duration of the excitable gap. However, PPF did not alter the duration of the fully excitable portion. We studied 36 annihilations without and 48 with PPF. Transient fibrillation was found in 75% of the episodes without, compared to 22% with PPF. Other types of termination such as conduction block, CL oscillations, and reversal of activation were found for 25% of the episodes without and 78% with PPF. In many cases, conduction block and CL oscillations were associated with a failure of propagation of the stimulated antegrade wavefront in the region of collision. Termination by reversal of activation suggests that propagation was two dimensional and could not be represented by a one dimensional movement. The average coupling interval (in percent of CL), that induced fibrillation was not significantly different from that at which conduction block occurred. This suggests that transient fibrillation is associated with a weak CE rather than with rapid pacing. The CE is amplified by multiple stimuli and PPF. The incidence of transient fibrillation in AF annihilation diminishes with PPF as the CE becomes more important. This suggests that the evaluation of PE and CE in AF may be an indication of the risk of atrial fibrillation.

Atypical atrial flutter originating in the right atrial free wall

BACKGROUND

Data from experimental models of atrial flutter indicate that macro-reentrant circuits may be confined by anatomic and functional barriers remote from the tricuspid annulus-eustachian ridge atrial isthmus. Data characterizing the various forms of atypical atrial flutter in humans are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 6 of 160 consecutive patients referred for ablation of counterclockwise and/or clockwise typical atrial flutter, an additional atypical atrial flutter was mapped to the right atrial free wall. Five patients had no prior cardiac surgery. Incisional atrial tachycardia was excluded in the remaining patient. High-density electroanatomic maps of the reentrant circuit were obtained in 3 patients. Radiofrequency energy application from a discrete midlateral right atrial central line of conduction block to the inferior vena cava terminated and prevented the reinduction of atypical atrial flutter in each patient. Atrial flutter has not recurred in any patient (follow-up, 18+/-17 months; range, 3 to 40 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial flutter can arise in the right atrial free wall. This form of atypical atrial flutter could account for spontaneous or inducible atrial flutter observed in patients referred for ablation and is eliminated with linear ablation directed at the inferolateral right atrium.

Electrophysiological delineation of the tachycardia circuit in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The exact boundaries of the reentry circuit in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have not been convincingly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To define the tachycardia circuit, single extrastimuli were delivered during AVNRT to 8 sites of the right intra-atrial septum: 3 arbitrarily divided sites of the AV junction extending from the His bundle (HB) site to the coronary sinus ostium (CSOS) (sites S, M, and I) and the superior (S-CSOS), inferior (I-CSOS), posterior (P-CSOS), and posteroinferior (PI-CSOS) portions of the CSOS and the CSOS in 18 patients. The mean tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 368+/-52 ms. Retrograde earliest atrial activation was observed at the HB site in all patients. The longest coupling intervals of single extrastimuli that reset AVNRT at sites S, M, I, I-CSOS, CSOS, S-CSOS, P-CSOS, and PI-CSOS were 356+/-51, 356+/-51, 355+/-52, 357+/-51, 318+/-47, 305+/-53, 311+/-56, and 312+/-56 ms, respectively, and the following return cycles at these sites were 368+/-52, 368+/-53, 367+/-53, 367+/-53, 407+/-66, 431+/-73, 415+/-55, and 412+/-56 ms, respectively. The longest coupling intervals at sites S, M, I, and I-CSOS did not differ from each other and were longer than those at CSOS and S-, P-, and PI-CSOS (P<0.0001). The return cycles at sites S, M, I, and I-CSOS did not differ from the TCL, whereas those at CSOS and S-, P-, and PI-CSOS were longer than the TCL (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The perinodal atrium extending from the HB site to I-CSOS was involved in the tachycardia circuit. I-CSOS was thought to be the entrance of the slow pathway.

Electrophysiological determinant for induction of isthmus dependent counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter in humans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the electrophysiological determinant underlying the electrical induction of counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus dependent atrial flutter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The isthmus bordered by the inferior vena caval orifice-tricuspid annulus-coronary sinus ostium (IVCO-TA-CSO) has been assumed to be the site of both slow conduction and unidirectional block critical to the initiation of atrial flutter. Trans-isthmus and the global atrial conduction were studied in 25 patients with isthmus dependent atrial flutter (group A) and in 21 patients without atrial flutter (group B), by pacing at the coronary sinus ostium and the low lateral right atrium (LLRA) and mapping with a 20 pole Halo catheter in the right atrium.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) fluoroscopic isthmus length between the coronary sinus ostium and LLRA sites was 28.1 (4.0) mm in group A and 28.0 (3.9) mm in group B (p = 0.95), but the trans-isthmus conduction velocity of both directions at various pacing cycle lengths was nearly halved in group A compared with group B (mean 0.39-0.46 m/s v 0.83-0.89 m/s, p < 0.0001). Pacing at coronary sinus ostium directly induced counterclockwise atrial flutter in 14 patients and pacing at LLRA induced clockwise atrial flutter in 11 patients, following abrupt unidirectional trans-isthmus block. Transient atrial tachyarrhythmias preceded the onset of atrial flutter in 10 counterclockwise and six clockwise cases of atrial flutter. None of the group B patients had inducible atrial flutter even in the presence of trans-isthmus block. The intra- and interatrial conduction times, as well as the conduction velocities at the right atrial free wall and the septum, were similar and largely within the normal range in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical slowing of the trans-IVCO-TA-CSO isthmus conduction, but not the unidirectional block or the global atrial performance, is the electrophysiological determinant of the induction of counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus dependent atrial flutter in man.

Electropharmacologic effects of class I and class III antiarrhythmia drugs on typical atrial flutter: insights into the mechanism of termination

BACKGROUND

Acute effects of class I and class III antiarrhythmia drugs on the reentrant circuit of typical atrial flutter are not fully studied. Furthermore, the critical electrophysiologic determinants of flutter termination by antiarrhythmia drugs are not clear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 36 patients (mean age, 53+/-17 years) with clinically documented typical atrial flutter. A 20-pole "halo" catheter was positioned around the tricuspid annulus. Incremental pacing was performed to measure the conduction velocity along the isthmus and lateral wall, and extrastimulation was performed to evaluate atrial refractory period in the baseline state and after intravenous infusion of ibutilide, propafenone, and amiodarone. Efficacy of these drugs in conversion of typical atrial flutter and patterns of termination were also determined. Ibutilide significantly increased the atrial refractory period and decreased conduction velocity in the isthmus at short pacing cycle length. It terminated atrial flutter in 8 (67%) of 12 patients after prolongation of flutter cycle length due to increase (86+/-19%) of conduction time in the isthmus. Propafenone predominantly decreased conduction velocity with use dependency and significantly increased atrial refractory period, but it only converted atrial flutter in 4 (33%) of 12 patients. Amiodarone had fewer effects on atrial refractory period and conduction velocity than did ibutilide and propafenone, and it terminated atrial flutter in only 4 (33%) of 12 patients. Termination of typical atrial flutter was due to failure of wave front propagation through the isthmus, which occurred with cycle length oscillation, abruptly without variability of cycle length, or after premature activation of the reentrant circuit.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibutilide, with a unique increase in atrial refractoriness, was more effective in conversion of atrial flutter than were propafenone and amiodarone.

Effects of procainamide on the excitable gap composition in common human atrial flutter

The composition of the excitable gap (EG) in common atrial flutter (AF1) was determined before and during infusion of procainamide (PA) in 9 patients (6 men and 3 women; age 70 +/- 7 years). The EG was determined by introducing a premature stimulus after every 20th AF1 complex detected using a quadripolar electrode catheter placed just above the tricuspid valve. Diastole was scanned in 2- to 4-ms decrements to the atrial effective refractory period (ERP). The relationship between the coupling interval and the return cycle length (CL) determined a reset-response curve (RRC), which described the EG. PA (15 mg/kg) was administered during AF1 over 30 minutes and RRC was repeated at maximum AF1 CL. PA prolonged AF1 CL from 227 +/- 29 to 296 +/- 62 ms (P < 0.01) but did not terminate AF1. ERP during AF1 prolonged from 169 +/- 24 to 219 +/- 41 ms (P < 0.01). Control EG was 57 +/- 16 ms or 25% +/- 6% of AF1 CL and on PA EG was 77 +/- 30 ms (P = 0.01), which was still 26% +/- 7% of the CL. Without drug, RRC was mixed in eight cases demonstrating an EG composed of fully excitable tissue (10 +/- 4 ms or 19% +/- 10% of the EG) and partially refractory tissue (48 +/- 18 ms). PA did not change the duration of the fully excitable region (13 +/- 10 ms or 19% +/- 15% of EG). Peak PA plasma concentration was 47 +/- 20 mumol/L. PA prolonged AF1 CL, ERP, and EG duration but did not change the proportion of AF1 CL occupied by the EG. The persistance of fully excitable tissue at the head of the wavefront in the presence of PA may largely explain its inefficacy in the acute termination of common AF1.

Antiarrhythmic actions of intravenous ibutilide compared with procainamide during human atrial flutter and fibrillation: electrophysiological determinants of enhanced conversion efficacy

BACKGROUND

The selective class III antiarrhythmic agent ibutilide prolongs action potential duration and terminates atrial flutter (AFL) and fibrillation (AF), but the mechanism of its antiarrhythmic efficacy in humans has not been fully characterized. This study compared the antiarrhythmic effects of ibutilide with the class IA agent procainamide in humans during AFL and AF. Antiarrhythmic drug actions and electrophysiological characteristics of AFL and AF that enhanced pharmacological termination were investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Right atrial monophasic action potentials were recorded during 148 episodes of AFL (n=89) or AF (n=59) in 136 patients treated with intravenous ibutilide (n=73) or placebo (n=22) as participants in randomized, double-blinded comparative studies or intravenous procainamide (n=53) in a concurrent open-label study. The conversion rates in AFL with ibutilide, procainamide, and placebo were 64% (29 of 45 patients), 0% (0 of 33), and 0% (0 of 11), respectively, whereas in AF the rates were 32% (9 of 28), 5% (1 of 20), and 0% (0 of 11), respectively. In AFL, ibutilide increased atrial monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) more (30% versus 18%, P<.001) and prolonged atrial cycle length (CL) less (16% versus 26%, P<.001) than procainamide. Ibutilide shortened and procainamide prolonged action potential diastolic interval during AFL (-12% versus 51%, P<.001). Ibutilide increased MAPD/CL ratio, whereas procainamide tended to decrease this ratio (13% versus -6%, P<.01). In AF, ibutilide and procainamide induced similar increases in atrial CL (48% versus 45%), but ibutilide induced a greater increase in MAPD (52% versus 37%, P<.05). Independent electrophysiological predictors of pharmacological arrhythmia termination were increase in MAPD/CL ratio (P=.005) in AFL and longer baseline mean MAPD (P=.011) in AF. Termination of AFL with ibutilide was characterized by significant increases in beat-to-beat atrial CL, MAPD, and diastolic interval variability. Ibutilide was significantly more effective in converting AF when the mean atrial CL was > or = 160 ms (64% versus 0%, P<.001) or MAPD was > or = 125 ms (57% versus 0%, P=.002) at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced conversion efficacy of ibutilide compared with procainamide in AFL is correlated with a relatively greater prolongation of atrial MAPD than atrial CL, and termination of AFL by ibutilide is characterized by oscillations in atrial CL and MAPD. Conversion of AF by ibutilide is enhanced by a longer baseline mean atrial CL or MAPD.

Characterization of the excitable gap in human type I atrial flutter

OBJECTIVES

We sought to characterize the excitable gap of the reentrant circuit in atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND

The electrophysiologic substrate of typical atrial flutter has not been well characterized. Specifically, it is not known whether the properties of the tricuspid valve isthmus differ from those of the remainder of the circuit.

METHODS

Resetting was performed from two sites within the circuit: proximal (site A) and distal (site B) to the isthmus in 14 patients with type I atrial flutter. Resetting response patterns and the location where interval-dependent conduction slowing occurred were assessed.

RESULTS

Some duration of a flat resetting response (mean +/- SD 40.1 +/- 20.9 ms, 16 +/- 8% of the cycle length) was observed in 13 of 14 patients; 1 patient had a purely increasing response. During the increasing portion of the resetting curve, interval-dependent conduction delay most commonly occurred in the isthmus. In most cases, the resetting response was similar at both sites. In three patients, the resetting response differed significantly between the two sites; this finding suggests that paced beats may transiently change conduction within the circuit or the circuit path, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

Some duration of a flat resetting response was observed in most cases of type I atrial flutter, signifying a fully excitable gap in all portions of the circuit. The isthmus represents the portion of the circuit most vulnerable to interval-dependent conduction delay at short coupling intervals.

The upper link of human common atrial flutter circuit: definition by multiple endocardial recordings during entrainment

Common atrial flutter is due to a macroreentry circuit in the right atrium, but the cranial path of the circuit has not been defined. The objectives of this article are to determine the cranial turning point of flutter activation in relation to a hypothetic obstacle, the superior vena cava opening, by examining the changes in activation sequence produced by entrainment from different points. In 13 cases of common atrial flutter with typical counter-clockwise right atrial circuits confirmed by endocardial mapping the atrium was paced from the high posterior and mid-septal walls. Entrainment was confirmed by simultaneous recordings of 6-7 right atrial electrograms. Changes in sequence of electrograms from high septum and high anterolateral walls was sought. Electrogram sequence and morphology did not change with entrainment at the posterior wall with respect to the basal flutter or mid-septal wall entrainment. Pacing "below" the superior vena cava did not advance the anterior wall electrogram in relation to the septal electrogram. These findings support the concept that common flutter activation turned around (cranial and anterior to) the superior vena cava opening, and not around the free end of a line of block below the superior vena cava in the posterior wall. Common atrial flutter activation rotates cranial (and anterior) to the superior vena cava opening, through the "right atrial roof." The line of functional block should span from inferior to superior vena cava openings.

The upper turnover site in the reentry circuit of common atrial flutter

The upper turnover site of the reentry circuit of common atrial flutter was examined with the uses of atrial activation mapping and extrastimulus techniques during atrial flutter. The findings suggest that it is anterior to the orifice of the superior vena cava, i.e., between the superior vena cava and tricuspid annulus.

Pharmacologic therapy of atrial flutter

Atrial flutter is a relatively rare but nonetheless important arrhythmia. Its mechanism and anatomy have been defined as right atrial macroreentry. It responds to treatment with a variety of antiarrhythmic agents but, in general, drug efficacy for acute termination is low. The addition of pacing to drug therapy markedly improves the success rate for restoration of sinus rhythm. Useful antiarrhythmic agents include amiodarone, sotalol, disopyramide, flecainide, and propafenone, but definitive efficacy studies have not been performed. The risk of provoking 1:1 AV conduction and a marked increase in ventricular response rate is always present. AV nodal blocking drugs (digoxin and verapamil) probably offer protection from this unwanted effect, but the prevalence of 1:1 conduction and the efficacy of AV nodal blockade remain to be established. When drug management fails, there is a place for radiofrequency ablation. Little is known about the thromboembolic risk of atrial flutter. As a consequence, the role of prophylactic anticoagulation is uncertain. Current interest in atrial flutter will ensure that these and other clinical questions are answered in the near future.

Role of right atrial endocardial structures as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter. Activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The importance of barriers in atrial flutter has been demonstrated in animals. We used activation and entrainment mapping, guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), to determine whether the crista terminalis (CT) and eustachian ridge (ER) are barriers to conduction during typical atrial flutter in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In eight patients, ICE was used to guide the placement of 20-pole and octapolar catheters along the CT and interatrial septum and a roving catheter to nine sites: just posterior (1) and anterior (2) to the CT along the lateral right atrium, at the fossa ovalis (3), and just posterior and anterior to the ER at the low posterolateral (4 and 5), low posterior (6 and 7), and low posteromedial (8 and 9) right atrium. Entrainment was performed, and each site was considered within the flutter circuit if the postpacing interval-flutter cycle length (PPI-FCL) and the stimulus time-activation time (stim time-act time) were < 10 msec. Split potentials were recorded along the CT with components activated in a low-to-high pattern and a high-to-low pattern. Conduction times, as percentage of FCL, were significantly different at sites on either side of the CT and ER: site 1 (33 +/- 13%) and site 2 (43 +/- 12%) (P = .02), site 4 (48 +/- 24%) and site 5 (75 +/- 8.9%) (P = .02), and site 6 (22 +/- 10%) and site 7 (82 +/- 5.3%) (P = .0009). During entrainment, no surface fusion was observed at sites 5, 7, or 9. The PPI-FCL and stim time-act time were not significantly different than 0 at sites 2, 7, 5, or 9, indicating that they were within the flutter circuit, whereas sites 1, 3, 4, and 6 were not.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE enabled the correlation of functional electrophysiological properties with specific anatomic landmarks, identifying the CT and ER as barriers to conduction during human atrial flutter.

Frequency and implications of resetting and entrainment with right atrial stimulation in atrial flutter

Thirty-three patients (24 with typical and 9 with atypical flutter-wave morphology) were studied to evaluate the incidence and implications of resetting and entrainment of atrial flutter with right atrial stimulation. Resetting with single extrastimulus was present in 23 cases (group A) and absent in 10 (group B). Most cases of reset flutter were typical (20 of 23). Fixed fusion indicative of entrainment was observed in all 29 cases with pacing trains. Groups A and B did not differ significantly in flutter cycle length (230 +/- 20 vs 223 +/- 19 ms), atrial functional refractory period (165 +/- 18 vs 167 +/- 22 ms) or longest paced cycle length producing entrainment (213 +/- 19 vs 210 +/- 19 ms). In contrast, the return cycle after the longest paced cycle length producing entrainment was significantly shorter in group A (228 +/- 27 vs 284 +/- 56 ms; p = 0.001). The return cycle in group A was virtually identical to the flutter cycle length, whereas in group B it was greater (p = 0.002 compared with group A). Resetting was more frequent in typical than atypical flutter (20 of 24 vs 3 of 9; p = 0.01). Both typical and atypical flutter can be transiently entrained by right atrial pacing. Lack of resetting and longer return cycle, suggesting a longer conduction time between the reentrant circuit and the stimulation site, were mostly observed in atypical flutter. The data suggest a different location for both types of flutter, and may have implications for ablation techniques. A more cautious approach, with more extensive mapping, appears appropriate for ablation attempts of atypical flutter.