Lack of correlation between the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and regional wall motion abnormalities in coronary artery disease

Effect of body characteristics on the variables of signal-averaged electrocardiograms in healthy subjects

Late potentials have been reported to be affected by body size or left ventricular mass. To our knowledge, however, the effect of subadipose tissue, which is known to influence QRS amplitudes of the surface ECG on the variables of late potentials, has not been evaluated. The relationships between the variables of late potentials and various obesity indices were assessed in 45 men, aged 24 to 38 years, without structural heart disease and bundle branch blocks. QRS duration (DUR), root mean square voltage in the last 40 ms (RMS), and low-amplitude signals < 40 microV (LAS) were obtained by signal-averaged ECG. Left ventricular mass (LV mass) was determined by echocardiography. The DUR and RMS had no correlation with body height, weight, body mass index (BMI), sum of skin folds (triceps and subscapular), or LV mass. Positive linear correlations were found between LAS and weight (r = 0.48, p < 0.002), BMI (r = 0.54, p < 0.002), sum of skin folds (r = 0.57, p < 0.002), and percent BMI (r = 0.54, p < 0.002). Subadipose tissue may shift the onset of the 40-microV point of LAS to the left with a consequent prolongation of LAS by attenuation of the QRS complex. These data suggest that the use of LAS alone or as a combination in an obese population for the definition of positive late potentials is inappropriate.

Current usefulness of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram

Signal-averaged electrocardiography is a relatively simple, noninvasive technique by which valuable information can be gained to help in the management of patients with cardiovascular disease. The presence of late potentials on the SAECG is a good marker for the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate that is believed to be the source of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. The value of the detection of late potentials has been studied best after myocardial infarction, when the absence of late potentials makes the occurrence of an arrhythmic event very unlikely. The positive predictive value for an arrhythmic event to occur in the presence of late potentials is low, however, comparable to the predictive value of decreased left ventricular function, complex ventricular ectopy, or abnormal autonomic tone. This appears to have its explanation in the complex pathophysiology behind the occurrence of arrhythmic events. Improved accuracy for the SAECG is achieved when the result of the test is interpreted with consideration of the presence or absence of other predictive markers. A thorough understanding of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram makes optimal clinical use of the information gained from this easily acquired test possible.