Treatment of refractory familial hypercholesterolemia by low-density lipoprotein apheresis using an automated dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption system. The Liposorber Study Group

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

LDL-apheresis-induced remission of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis recurrence in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in pediatric patients is typically difficult to treat and will progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in about 10% of cases. Following kidney transplantation, FSGS can recur in up to 56% of renal allografts-with a near 100% recurrence in subsequent transplants.

METHODS

Four different pediatric centers across the USA and the UK employed a protocol using LDL-apheresis (LDL-A) and pulse solumedrol to treat recurrent FSGS after transplantation in seven patients. All the patients included in this series demonstrated immediate, or early, recurrence of FSGS, which clinically presented as nephrotic-range proteinuria within hours to days after implantation of the kidney.

RESULTS

All patients experienced reductions in urinary protein to creatinine ratios resulting in partial or complete remission. All patients demonstrated improvements in their estimated GFRs at their most recent follow-up since LDL-A discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series describes the successful treatment, across four different pediatric centers, of seven pediatric patients with recurrent post-transplant FSGS using the Liposorber® LA-15 in combination with pulse solumedrol.

An update on LDL apheresis for nephrotic syndrome

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has been used increasingly in clinical practice for the treatment of renal diseases with nephrotic syndrome (NS), specifically focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Persistent hyperlipidemia for prolonged periods is nephrotoxic and leads to chronic progressive glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury. Effective management of hyperlipidemia with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or LDL apheresis in drug-resistant NS patients may prevent the progression of renal disease and, in some patients, resolution of NS symptoms. Available literature reveals beneficial effects of LDL apheresis for NS refractory to drug therapy. Here we update on the current understanding of lipid nephrotoxicity and application of LDL apheresis to prevent progression of renal diseases.

Discontinuation of LDL apheresis with evolocumab in an FH patient with a duplication of exon 2-6 in the LDLR gene

We report here a familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patient with a rare mutation, exon 2-6 duplication in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene, who had received LDL apheresis with drug treatment for 15 years. We added evolocumab (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) 140 mg bi-weekly to the treatment, and checked lipid profiles [LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), malondialdehyde-modified LDL, etc.] for 34 weeks. Evolocumab enabled the patient to discontinue LDL apheresis and decrease the dose of statin. We demonstrate that evolocumab contributed to the management of atherogenic lipoproteins in an FH patient with exon 2-6 duplication as an alternative to LDL apheresis. <Learning objective: LDL apheresis has been the last therapeutic tool for FH patients, however, the treatment is invasive and time consuming. FH patients show various clinical presentations and different responses to medication depending on their genetic mutations. In this severe heterozygous FH patient which seemed to be homozygous FH, we explored various lipid profiles and assessed the treatment when altering the treatment from LDL apheresis to evolocumab, moreover decreasing the dose of statin.>.

Long-term treatment with evolocumab added to conventional drug therapy, with or without apheresis, in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: an interim subset analysis of the open-label TAUSSIG study

BACKGROUND

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a genetic disorder characterised by substantially raised LDL cholesterol, reduced LDL receptor function, xanthomas, and cardiovascular disease before age 20 years. Conventional therapy is with statins, ezetimibe, and apheresis. We aimed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor evolocumab in a subset of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia enrolled in an open-label, non-randomised phase 3 trial.

METHODS

In this interim subset analysis of the TAUSSIG study, which was undertaken at 35 sites in 17 countries, we included patients aged 12 years or older with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who were on stable LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy for at least 4 weeks; all patients received evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly, or if on apheresis every 2 weeks. Dosing could be increased to every 2 weeks after 12 weeks in patients not on apheresis. The primary outcome of the TAUSSIG study was treatment-emergent adverse events; secondary outcomes were the effects of evolocumab on LDL cholesterol and other lipids. We analysed patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and all statistical comparisons were done post hoc in this interim analysis. The TAUSSIG study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01624142, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

106 patients were included in this analysis, 34 receiving apheresis at study entry and 14 younger than 18 years. The first patient was enrolled on June 28, 2012, and the cutoff date for the analysis was Aug 13, 2015; mean follow-up was 1·7 years (SD 0·63). After 12 weeks, mean LDL cholesterol decreased from baseline by 20·6% (SD 24·4; mean absolute decrease 1·50 mmol/L [SD 1·92]); these reductions were maintained at week 48. 47 of 72 patients not on apheresis at study entry increased evolocumab dosing to every 2 weeks, with an additional mean reduction in LDL cholesterol of 8·3% (SD 13·0; mean absolute decrease 0·77 mmol/L [SD 1·38]; p=0·0001). In a post-hoc analysis, mean reductions in LDL cholesterol in patients on apheresis were significant at week 12 (p=0·0012) and week 48 (p=0·0032), and did not differ from reductions achieved in patients not on apheresis (p=0·38 at week 12 and p=0·09 at week 48). We noted a small reduction (median -7·7% [IQR -21·6 to 6·8]) in lipoprotein(a) at week 12 (p=0·0015), with some additional reduction at week 48 (-11·9% [-28·0 to 0·0]; p<0·0001). HDL cholesterol was increased by a mean of 7·6% (SD 18·1) at week 12 (p<0·0001) and 7·6% (SD 20·6) at week 48 (p=0·0007). Evolocumab was well tolerated; 82 (77%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events, which were mostly minor. The most common were nasopharyngitis (14 patients [13%]), influenza (13 [12%]), headache (11 [10%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (11 [10%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 18 (17%) patients, with the most common being cardiovascular events (four patients [4%]). There were no deaths and four positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, one (3%) among patients on apheresis and three (4%) among patients who did not receive apheresis.

INTERPRETATION

Our interim results suggest that evolocumab is an effective additional option to reduce LDL cholesterol in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, with or without apheresis.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Lipoprotein apheresis: present and future uses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For the past 40 years, apheresis, in particular, lipoprotein apheresis, has been the therapy of choice to lower LDL-C for familial hypercholesterolemia patients with uncontrolled dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. With the advent of recent and future lipid-modifying agents and their ability to lower LDL-C, the question arises on what will be the future of lipoprotein apheresis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipoprotein apheresis lowers not only plasma levels of apolipoprotein B lipoproteins but also markers of vascular inflammation and blood rheology. Other vascular diseases, not necessarily associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, such as nephrotic syndrome and peripheral arterial disease have profited from lipoprotein apheresis therapy. In 2013, the Food and Drug Administration approved lipoprotein apheresis therapy for patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Since 2010, the German healthcare ministry has approved lipoprotein apheresis therapy for patients with an elevated lipoprotein(a) and ongoing cardiovascular disease irrespective of LDL-C levels.

SUMMARY

Recent and future lipid-modifying therapies will most likely reduce the practice of lipoprotein apheresis therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Future implications for lipoprotein apheresis will involve vascular diseases that are at present lacking clinically effective therapy, whereas acute and chronic reductions of lipids, vascular inflammation, and/or rheology may improve the clinical outcome.

Removal of Soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1 by Dextran Sulfate Apheresis in Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a devastating complication of pregnancy. Soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) is an antiangiogenic protein believed to mediate the signs and symptoms of preeclampsia. We conducted an open pilot study to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of therapeutic apheresis with a plasma-specific dextran sulfate column to remove circulating sFlt-1 in 11 pregnant women (20-38 years of age) with very preterm preeclampsia (23-32 weeks of gestation, systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, new onset protein/creatinine ratio >0.30 g/g, and sFlt-1/placental growth factor ratio >85). We evaluated the extent of sFlt-1 removal, proteinuria reduction, pregnancy continuation, and neonatal and fetal safety of apheresis after one (n=6), two (n=4), or three (n=1) apheresis treatments. Mean sFlt-1 levels were reduced by 18% (range 7%-28%) with concomitant reductions of 44% in protein/creatinine ratios. Pregnancy continued for 8 days (range 2-11) and 15 days (range 11-21) in women treated once and multiple times, respectively, compared with 3 days (range 0-14) in untreated contemporaneous preeclampsia controls (n=22). Transient maternal BP reduction during apheresis was managed by withholding pre-apheresis antihypertensive therapy, saline prehydration, and reducing blood flow through the apheresis column. Compared with infants born prematurely to untreated women with and without preeclampsia (n=22 per group), no adverse effects of apheresis were observed. In conclusion, therapeutic apheresis reduced circulating sFlt-1 and proteinuria in women with very preterm preeclampsia and appeared to prolong pregnancy without major adverse maternal or fetal consequences. A controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Loss of plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) after lipoprotein apheresis

RATIONALE

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We have recently reported that >30% of plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) is bound to LDL, thus we predicted that LA would also reduce plasma PCSK9 levels by removing LDL.

OBJECTIVE

Pre- and post-apheresis plasma from 6 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia on 3 consecutive treatment cycles was used to determine changes in PCSK9 levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LA drastically reduced plasma LDL (by 77 ± 4%). Concomitantly, PCSK9 levels fell by 52 ± 5%, strongly correlating with the LDL drop (P=0.0322; r(2)=0.26), but not with decreases in triglyceride (49 ± 13%) or high-density lipoprotein levels (18 ± 2%). Levels of albumin, creatinine, and CK-MB did not show significant changes after LA. Similar to LDL, PCSK9 levels returned to pretreatment values between cycles (2-week intervals). Fractionation of pre- and post-apheresis plasma showed that 81 ± 11% of LDL-bound PCSK9 and 48 ± 14% of apolipoprotein B-free PCSK9 were removed. Separation of whole plasma, purified LDL, or the apolipoprotein B-free fraction through a scaled-down, experimental dextran sulfate cellulose beads column produced similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show, for the first time, that modulation of LDL levels by LA directly affects plasma PCSK9 levels, and suggest that PCSK9 reduction is an additional benefit of LA. Because the loss of PCSK9 could contribute to the LDL-lowering effect of LA, then (1) anti-PCSK9 therapies may reduce frequency of LA in patients currently approved for therapy, and (2) LA and anti-PCSK9 therapies may be used synergistically to reduce treatment burden.

Prospective multicentre study of the effect of voluntary plasmapheresis on plasma cholesterol levels in donors

Background and Objectives LDL apheresis is used to treat patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and low-volume plasmapheresis for plasma donation may similarly lower cholesterol levels in some donors. This study was designed to assess the effect of plasmapheresis on total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels in a plasma donor population.

Materials and Methods This was a prospective, unblinded longitudinal cohort study in which a blood sample was obtained for analysis before each donation. Data from 663 donors were analysed using a multivariable repeated measures regression model with a general estimating equations approach with changes in cholesterol as the primary outcome measure.

Results The model predicted a significant decrease in total and LDL cholesterol for both genders and all baseline cholesterol levels (P < 0·01). The greatest total cholesterol decreases (women, −46·8 mg/dL; men, −32·2 mg/dL) were associated with high baseline levels and 2–4 days between donations. Small but statistically significant increases (P ≤ 0·01) in HDL cholesterol were predicted for donors with low baseline levels.

Conclusions These results suggest that, in donors with elevated baseline cholesterol levels, total and LDL cholesterol levels may decrease during routine voluntary plasmapheresis.

LDL-apheresis: technical and clinical aspects

The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, and coronary heart disease refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are five different LDL-apheresis systems available: cascade filtration or lipid filtration, immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption, and the LDL hemoperfusion. There is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors, in severe hyperlipidemia therapeutic strategies should focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. Despite maximum conventional therapy with a combination of different kinds of lipid-lowering drugs, sometimes the goal of therapy cannot be reached. Hence, in such patients, treatment with LDL-apheresis is indicated. Technical and clinical aspects of these five different LDL-apheresis methods are shown here. There were no significant differences with respect to or concerning all cholesterols, or triglycerides observed. With respect to elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be most effective. The different published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia refractory to maximum conservative therapy is effective and safe in long-term application.

LDL-apheresis depletes apoE-HDL and pre-β1-HDL in familial hypercholesterolemia: relevance to atheroprotection

Subnormal HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo)AI levels are characteristic of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), reflecting perturbed intravascular metabolism with compositional anomalies in HDL particles, including apoE enrichment. Does LDL-apheresis, which reduces HDL-cholesterol, apoAI, and apoE by adsorption, induce selective changes in HDL subpopulations, with relevance to atheroprotection? Five HDL subpopulations were fractionated from pre- and post-LDL-apheresis plasmas of normotriglyceridemic FH subjects (n = 11) on regular LDL-apheresis (>2 years). Apheresis lowered both plasma apoE (-62%) and apoAI (-16%) levels, with preferential, genotype-independent reduction in apoE. The mass ratio of HDL2:HDL3 was lowered from ~1:1 to 0.72:1 by apheresis, reflecting selective removal of HDL2 mass (80% of total HDL adsorbed). Pre-LDL-apheresis, HDL2 subpopulations were markedly enriched in apoE, consistent with ~1 copy of apoE per 4 HDL particles. Large amounts (50-66%) of apoE-HDL were removed by apheresis, preferentially in the HDL2b subfraction (-50%); minor absolute amounts of apoE-HDL were removed from HDL3 subfractions. Furthermore, pre-β1-HDL particle levels were subnormal following removal (-53%) upon apheresis, suggesting that cellular cholesterol efflux may be defective in the immediate postapheresis period. In LDL-receptor (LDL-R) deficiency, LDL-apheresis may enhance flux through the reverse cholesterol transport pathway and equally attenuate potential biglycan-mediated deposition of apoE-HDL in the arterial matrix.

Severe hypercholesterolemia mediated by lipoprotein X in a pediatric patient with chronic graft-versus-host disease of the liver

We describe a case of extreme hypercholesterolemia, mediated by lipoprotein X, in a 12-year-old Caucasian female who underwent an unrelated allogenic bone marrow transplant for relapsed acute myelocytic leukemia (AML). Her post-transplant course was complicated by severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the liver. Previously normal serum cholesterol and triglycerides rose to 1,122 mg/dl (29.0 mmol/L) and 1,100 mg/dl (12.4 mmol/L), respectively. Serum cholesterol appeared to be dominantly carried by lipoprotein X. Intra-hepatic cholestasis leading to reflux of bile lipoproteins into the blood stream and subsequent formation of lipoprotein X appears to be the mechanism underlying this phenomenon.

Long-term efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis for focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis

Recently, there have been reports on the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis (LDL-A) for focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in pediatric patients. However, there have been few reports on the long-term efficacy of LDL-A for FSGS in such patients. We report here a case of long-term efficacy of LDL-A for FSGS. The patient was a 13-year-old boy with FSGS who presented with steroid-resistant and cyclosporine-resistant nephrotic syndrome and hyperlipidemia. LDL-A was performed 24 times on one year. Following LDL-A, serum concentrations of LDL, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), apoprotein B, and vascular endothelial growth factor significantly decreased, and urinary excretion of protein also decreased. In addition, 3 years after LDL-A, the pathology findings on a second renal biopsy had improved. The patient has been in remission from FSGS for 12 years since LDL-A. These findings suggest that LDL-A may be useful in maintaining long-term remission from pediatric FSGS.

Apheresis in Coronary Heart Disease With Elevated Lp (a): A Review of Lp (a) As a Risk Factor and Its Management

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) increases global cardiovascular risk, especially when LDL cholesterol is concomitantly elevated. Epidemiologic data show that Lp (a) concentration in plasma can be used to predict the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent manner and late stages of atherosclerosis are accelerated by elevated Lp (a). Therapeutic means to lower Lp (a) are limited. The most effective method to reduce plasma Lp (a) concentration significantly is therapeutic apheresis. Because apheresis is laborious and expensive, patients considered for this procedure should suffer from high Lp (a) concentrations, well beyond 50 mg/dL, and have manifested and progressive coronary heart disease despite maximal drug therapy. Experimental data and therapeutic results will be discussed in the present paper.

A systematic review of LDL apheresis in the treatment of cardiovascular disease

LDL apheresis is an effective method of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who are either refractory to treatment or intolerant of medical therapy. We searched the medical literature through July 2004 using PubMed and Medline and the search terms "LDL apheresis", "cardiovascular", and "disease" to identify apheresis techniques and to evaluate their effects on cardiovascular pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. We conclude that LDL apheresis reduces cardiovascular events in hypercholesterolemic patients and may be an effective treatment for other vascular diseases including cholesterol embolic disease, focal segmental glomerular sclerosis, sudden hearing loss, and age-related macular degeneration.

Long-term effects of LDL apheresis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder of lipoprotein metabolism involving mutations in the LDL receptor (LDL-R). Patients with mutation in one (heterozygous) or both (homozygous) genes have markedly elevated LDL cholesterol and are at increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Aggressive lipid lowering is required for homozygous and many heterozygous FH patients. This often involves LDL-apheresis, where LDL and other apo-B containing lipoproteins are selectively removed from the plasma. We have retrospectively studied 34 patients treated with biweekly LDL-apheresis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. In our patient population, adverse events were uncommon and rarely resulted in shortened treatment time. There was a dramatic decrease in the relative risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions in patients treated with LDL-apheresis for an average of 2.5 years. Some but not all patients had long-term reduction in their LDL levels as a result of LDL-apheresis, suggesting that time-averaged reduction in LDL and/or LDL:HDL ratios were responsible for clinical improvement. These data support the use of LDL-apheresis in patients with FH, as well as medication-intolerant patients that have elevated LDL cholesterol despite maximal pharmacological treatment.

Ten-year Follow-up of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients After Intensive Cholesterol-lowering Therapy

To prevent coronary artery disease, it is necessary for patients with familial hyper-cholesterolemia (FH) to maintain a low cholesterol level. Recently a combination therapy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis and statins has been used for FH patients, but their long-term prognosis over 10 years is unknown. In this single center prospective report, 18 FH patients with severe coronary stenosis received LDL apheresis every 2 or 4 weeks and statin therapy for 9.8 +/- 3.0 years. Probucol was given to 17 of the 18 patients. We observed their clinical events as well as coronary stenosis findings and ejection fractions for 10.7 +/- 2.6 years. Total and LDL cholesterol levels before therapy were 345 +/- 46 and 277 +/- 48 mg/dL, respectively. Immediately following LDL-apheresis, these levels decreased to 104 +/- 7.5 and 66 +/- 16 mg/dL, respectively. There were no cardiac deaths and 4 patients were free from any coronary events. There was one noncardiac death. Nonfatal myocardial in-farction occurred in 2 patients and coronary bypass surgery was required in one patient. Twelve patients received additional coronary angioplasty. There was little change in coronary stenosis and ejection fraction following 10 years of the combination therapy. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the calculated mean LDL cholesterol level was the predictive value of treatment efficacy (mean LDL cholesterol < 140 mg/dL, hazard ratio 0.23, P = 0.028). The combination therapy of LDL-apheresis and antilipid drugs delayed the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and prevented a major cardiac event, although complete inhibition was limited to a small group. Additional coronary angioplasty is likely to be required for a favorable clinical outcome in FH patients.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia presenting with cutaneous xanthomas: response to liver transplantation

A 19-month-old girl with cutaneous xanthomas was diagnosed with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, treated with atorvastatin, plasma exchange and finally at the age of 3.5 years, with liver transplantation. Her serum cholesterol levels fell to normal and the xanthomas regressed following liver transplantation. She remains well 17 months post transplant.

Severe hypercholesterolemia mediated by lipoprotein X in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease of the liver

We describe a series of cases of extreme hypercholesterolemia mediated by lipoprotein X in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease of the liver after an allogeneic bone marrow transplant. All of the patients presented with a total cholesterol in excess of 1000 mg/dl (25.9 mmol/l). At the time they were also noted to have pseudohyponatremia. Cholesterol appeared to be predominantly carried by lipoprotein X. Intrahepatic cholestasis leading to reflux of bile lipoproteins into the bloodstream and subsequent formation of protein X appears to be the mechanism underlying this phenomenon. Complications, including retinal cholesterol thromboembolism and cholesteroloma of the lung have been seen in the patient with the highest cholesterol levels. Severe hypercholesterolemia is an important, and likely more common than previously reported, long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It is important for clinicians to familiarize themselves with the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges this condition presents.

Long-term survival of childhood coronary artery disease in a patient severely affected with familial hypercholesterolemia

This brief account of a patient severely affected with familial hypercholesterolemia and with coronary artery disease since age 13 reviews his therapy and survival into the fifth decade of life. This is heretofore unreported in phenotypically homozygous patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in the era before statin drugs, low-density lipoprotein apheresis, or their combination.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis: an overview

Atherosclerosis with myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral cellular disease still maintains its position at the top of morbidity and mortality statistics in industrialized nations. Established risk factors widely accepted are smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lpa) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are four different LDL apheresis systems available: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption and LDL hemoperfusion. Regarding the different LDL apheresis systems used, there is no significant difference with respect to the clinical outcome or concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or triglyceride concentrations. With respect to elevated Lpa levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be the most effective. In 45 patients (25 women, 20 men) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis was performed over 95.6 +/- 44.7 months. Four different systems (Liposorber, 32 of 45, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; Therasorb, 6 of 45, Baxter, Munich, Germany; Lipopak, 2 of 45, Pocard, Moscow, Russia; and Dali, 5 of 45, Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) were used. With all methods, average reductions of 57% for total cholesterol, 55.9% for LDL, 75.8% for lipoprotein a (Lpa), and 45.9% for triglycerides, and an average increase of 14.3% for HDL were reached. Severe side-effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.3%) in all methods. In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced by 44 of 45 patients. The present data demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to maximum conservative therapy is very effective and safe even in long-term application.

LDL Apheresis: an effective and safe treatment for refractory hypercholesterolemia

Through the efforts of Edward H. Ahrens, LDL apheresis became available for the treatment of patients, often with familial hypercholesterolemia, who have no alternative therapy for severely elevated LDL cholesterol levels. In the U.S., the FDA has approved this treatment for individuals on maximum diet and drugs with an LDL cholesterol greater than 300 mg/dL or greater than 200 mg/dL with coronary artery disease. Unlike plasmapheresis, apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins (LDL, Lp(a), and VLDL) are selectively removed by heparin precipitation or columns containing dextran sulfate cellulose or antibodies to apolipoprotein B. The acute lowering of LDL-cholesterol by a typical 2 - 3 h treatment is up to 80%, and the time-averaged lowering in the 1 to 2 week interval between treatments is up to 50%, with very few side effects. The lowering of LDL-cholesterol and other cardioprotective effects of LDL apheresis have reduced chest pain, prevented new disability and prolonged life. Whole blood compatible columns in development offer the possibility of simpler and less expensive treatments.

LDL apheresis

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis provides a safe and effective means of treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). It also has a role in preventing the progression of coronary artery disease in heterozygotes and others with severe dyslipidaemia who are refractory to or intolerant of high doses of lipid-lowering drugs. Established methods involve either adsorption of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by affinity columns containing anti-apolipoprotein B antibodies or dextran sulphate, or their precipitation at low pH by heparin, in each instance after first separating plasma from blood cells with a cell separator. The most recently developed method enables lipoproteins to be adsorbed directly from whole blood, using polyacrylate columns. All 4 methods have proved to be similarly efficient when used weekly or biweekly to lower LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) without unduly reducing HDL cholesterol. Economic constraints restrict the use of LDL apheresis to the treatment of potentially fatal disorders such as FH, where there is clear evidence of benefit compared with conventional therapy. Widening the indications to include the treatment of other dyslipidaemic disorders such as steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, post-transplant donor vessel disease, stroke and prevention of re-stenosis after coronary angioplasty requires evidence from controlled trials that is currently lacking.

Meaning of low-density lipoprotein-apheresis for hypercholesterolemic patients at high risk for recurrence of coronary heart disease

The goal of cholesterol-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients at high risk for recurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) is the prevention of acute coronary syndrome by stabilization of coronary atheromatous plaque. We often encounter patients in whom it is difficult to maintain the serum cholesterol level at a desirable level with dietary therapy and drug treatment, despite the development and use of statins. For secondary prevention in patients who are at high risk for the recurrence of CHD and whose cholesterol level cannot be controlled by drugs alone, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis therapy, which involves removal of LDL through extracorporeal circulation, is now available. Many reports concerning improvement of vascular endothelial function, improvement of myocardial ischemia, regression of coronary atherosclerotic lesions, stabilization of coronary plaque, and reduction in the incidence of cardiac events as a result of LDL-apheresis treatment have been published in various countries. We believe that LDL-apheresis should be performed on hypercholesterolemic patients with existing CHD for whom diet and maximum cholesterol-lowering drug therapies have been ineffective or not tolerated and whose LDL cholesterol level is 160 mg/dL or higher.

The current status of therapeutic apheresis devices in the United States

Over the last 40 years, plasmapheresis technology and its indications for use have been continually evolving. With the growing incidence for autoimmune diseases, unsatisfactory therapeutic options, side effects of drug therapy, and economic relevance, apheresis clinicians have been leaning toward more selective plasmapheresis techniques through the use of plasma fractionators and immunoadsorption columns. Plasma fractionators are mostly used in Asia, and rarely utilized in the U.S. The majority of plasma filters approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are primary membrane plasma separators, which still require replacement fluid. The secondary plasma fractionators available in the U.S. are limited in used and mostly investigational. Immunoadsorption columns, mostly used in Europe, are gaining popularity in the U.S. Some FDA-approved immunoadsorption columns include the Prosorba protein-A silica column, Immunosorba tryptophan and phenylalanine columns, Immunosorba protein-A sepharose column, and Liposorber dextran sulfate column. In addition, the heparin-induce extracorporeal lipoprotein precipitation (HELP) system is also FDA-approved. However, there are other immunoadsorption technologies used in Europe, such as direct adsorption lipoprotein LDL-hemoperfusion, not yet available in the U.S. While each method of apheresis carries its own risks and benefits, it is the opinion of the authors that these additional apheresis techniques be available to U.S. researchers and clinicians as a therapeutic option. The authors believe that the U.S. need to aggressively investigate more specific plasmapheresis modalities and establish appropriate dialogue with regulatory and reimbursement officials for FDA-approval of these devices.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis: clinical results with different methods

In 40 patients (22 women, 18 men) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis was performed over 84.9 +/- 43.2 months. Four different systems (Liposorber, 28 of 40, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; Therasorb, 6 of 40, Baxter, Munich, Germany; Lipopak, 2 of 40, Pocard, Moscow, Russia; and Dali, 4 of 40, Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) were used. With all methods, average reductions of 50.6% for total cholesterol, 52.2% for LDL, 64.3% for lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), and 43.1% for triglycerides, and an average increase of 10.3% for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were reached. Severe side effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.5%) in all methods. In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well being and increased performance were experienced by 39 of 40 patients. Assessing the different apheresis systems used, at the end of the trial, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome experienced with the patients' total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations. However, to reduce high Lp(a) levels, the immunoadsorption method with special Lp(a) columns (Lipopak) seems to be most effective: -59% versus -25% (Kaneka) - (Baxter), and -29% (Dali). The present data demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to maximum conservative therapy is very effective and safe even in long-term application.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of refractory hyperlipidemia

The advent of treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors has meant that, with a combination of diet and drug therapy, adequate control of serum cholesterol concentrations can be achieved in most patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, some patients, primarily those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), may require additional therapy to lower their cholesterol levels. In recent years, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has emerged as an effective method of treatment in these patients. The criteria for commencement of LDL apheresis are LDL cholesterol levels of 500 mg/dL or higher for homozygous FH patients, 300 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients in whom medical therapy has failed, and 200 mg/dL or higher for heterozygous FH patients with documented coronary disease and in whom medical therapy has failed. In addition to cholesterol lowering in patients with FH, other indications for LDL apheresis are emerging. These include its use in the treatment of graft vascular disease in patients receiving cardiac transplants as well as in the treatment of certain glomerulonephritides. This review examines the role of LDL apheresis in the management of lipid disorders and the evidence available to support its use in clinical practice.

Effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on coronary and carotid atherosclerosis and diabetic scleredema in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia

Correlations between serum cholesterol levels and progression of coronary and peripheral atherosclerosis have been found in many recent studies. It has also been demonstrated that aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis, a method of LDL elimination by extracorporeal circulation, is effective not only for coronary artery disease, but also for systemic circulatory disturbance in severe hypercholesterolemic patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in particular. We found that LDL apheresis treatment with medical therapy improved coronary atherosclerotic lesions, based on coronary angiography evaluation and histopathological observation, suppressed progression of early carotid atherosclerotic lesions on annual B-mode ultrasonography, and improved diabetic scleredema in FH patients. This effectiveness of LDL apheresis appears to be due to recovery of vascular endothelial function and improvement of blood rheology. For diseases that are possibly due to circulation disturbance and that are intractable with drugs alone. LDL apheresis may be worth trying, particularly for patients complicated by hyperlipemia.

Current topics on low-density lipoprotein apheresis

The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are four different LDL-apheresis systems available: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL-adsorption, and LDL-hemoperfusion. Despite substantial progress in diagnostics, drug therapy, and cardiosurgical procedures, atherosclerosis with myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral cellular disease still maintains its position at the top of morbidity and mortality statistics in industrialized nations. Established risk factors widely accepted are smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors, in severe hyperlipidemia (HLP) therapeutic strategies should focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. Despite maximum conventional therapy with a combination of different kinds of lipid-lowering drugs, however, sometimes the goal of therapy cannot be reached. Mostly, the prognosis of patients suffering from severe HLP, sometimes combined with elevated Lp(a) levels and CHD refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. Hence, in such patients, treatment with LDL-apheresis can be useful. Regarding the different LDL-apheresis systems used, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome or concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high-density lipoprotein, or triglyceride concentrations. With respect to elevated Lp(a) levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be the most effective. The published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia refractory to maximum conservative therapy is effective and safe in long-term application.

Lipid reductions by low-density lipoprotein apheresis: a comparison of three systems

There are currently three established low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis systems: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP), and dextran sulfate. We treated the same patient with all three systems and compared the lipid reductions achieved. A total of 135 consecutive treatments were studied, 57 with immunoadsorption, followed by 30 with HELP and 48 with dextran sulfate adsorption. The mean plasma volume (mean +/- SD) treated was 4.9 +/- 0.05, 3.08 +/- 0.091, and 3.39 +/- 0.71 L, respectively. The LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction was 75.5% +/- 7.4%, 61.6% +/- 5.1%, and 57.1% +/- 12.4%, respectively (P < .001 for immunoadsorption vHELP and dextran sulfate). The mean removal efficiency (mass removed/plasma volume treated) for LDL-C was 1.0 +/- 0.12, 1.42 +/- 0.25, and 1.15 +/- 0.21 g/L, respectively (P < .001 for HELP v immunoadsorption and dextran sulfate). The mean LDL-C plasma concentration before apheresis was 199 +/- 23.9, 201 +/- 25.7, and 186 +/- 28 mg/dL, respectively (P < .001 for dextran sulfate adsorption v immunoadsorption and HELP). Among the three LDL apheresis systems, immunoadsorption caused the greatest percent reduction in LDL-C, while HELP eliminated LDL-C from the plasma most efficiently. Dextran sulfate was similar to HELP in terms of LDL-C reduction, and its removal efficiency was similar to immunoadsorption. Dextran sulfate was also associated with the lowest pretreatment plasma LDL-C concentration.

Plasmapheresis-related hypotension

Hypotension is an uncommon complication of procedures involving extracorporeal circulation, including plasmapheresis. From November 1993 to March 1999, we treated 139 patients who underwent a total of 1,137 sessions of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFP). Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (BP) < 80 mm Hg or any decrease of systolic BP with systemic reactions. A total of 17 (1.5%) episodes of hypotension were documented in 15 patients during the study period. Hypotensive episodes occurred in 2.3% of patients with inflammatory neuropathy, 1.2% of patients with myasthenia gravis, and 1.2% of patients with all other medical diseases. Involvement of the autonomic nerve system (ANS) and a low baseline BP were associated with the occurrence of hypotension. Eight (47%) of 17 episodes were symptomatic and 2 were complicated with seizure. Patients with symptomatic hypotension had a higher level of systolic BP prior to DFP and a larger drop of systolic BP and pulse rate during hypotensive attacks compared to asymptomatic patients. Most hypotensive episodes were resolved briefly after intravenous infusion of saline within 30 min. Eight (47%) of the hypotensive episodes occurred during the first session of DFP treatment. Twelve (71%) of 17 episodes occurred during the last half period of treatment; 6 of them were noted during the terminating stage of DFP. In conclusion, in this series plasmapheresis-related hypotension occurred in 1.5% of DFP sessions and had a higher prevalence in patients with ANS instability and low BP. Extra caution in monitoring BP during DFP therapy is warranted in these vulnerable patients, especially during the termination phase of the first DFP session.

Long-term effects of LDL apheresis on carotid arterial atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolaemic patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term effect of LDL apheresis on carotid arterial atherosclerosis in severe familial hypercholesterolaemic (FH) patients.

DESIGN

Changes in existing plaque, new plaque formation and annual progression rate of carotid early plaque were evaluated by B-mode ultrasonography.

SUBJECTS

LDL apheresis group: two homozygous FH and nine heterozygous FH patients received a combination of LDL apheresis and cholesterol-lowering drug therapy for a mean of 7.8 years.

CONTROL GROUP

10 heterozygous FH patients were maintained by medication only for a mean of 5.5 years.

RESULTS

As a result of LDL apheresis treatment, LDL cholesterol levels reduced from 16.0+/-3.60 to 6.43+/-0.07 mmol L(-1) in homozygous FH patients and from 11.5+/-2.46 to 4.32+/-1.2 mmol L(-1) in heterozygous FH patients. During the long-term treatment period, the existing plaque tended to progress and new plaque formation in carotid arteries was also observed in both groups. The annual progression rate of mean maximum intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery was a mean of -0.0023+/-0.0246 mm year(-1) in heterozygous FH patients in the LDL apheresis group, suggesting regression. This was significantly lower when compared with the control group, which had a mean of 0.0251+/-0.0265 mm year(-1) CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the long-term treatment with combined LDL apheresis and drugs may delay the progression of the atherosclerotic process and prompt the stabilization of atheromatous plaque in severe FH patients.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis retards the progression of hyperlipidemic overt diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia has recently received attention as being involved in the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) can remove a large amount of plasma lipid directly from the patients in a short time.

METHODS

Fifteen type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy received LDL-A in two different manners: short-term intensive therapy (SIT) for nine patients and long-term intermittent therapy (LIT) for six patients.

RESULTS

The changes in the monthly decline rates of reciprocal serum creatinine (1/Cr) were -0.035 +/- 0.020 in the three-month period before SIT, 0.047 +/- 0.041 during and until two weeks after SIT, and -0.035 +/- 0.015 after a period of two weeks from the therapy. The mean duration of LIT in six patients was 8.2 +/- 7.4 months, and the mean monthly decline rates of 1/Cr significantly decreased during the period of LIT as compared with the six-month period before the treatment.

CONCLUSION

LDL-A can retard the progression of overt DN, especially when it is performed repeatedly for a long period at two-week intervals.

Effects of intensive lipid lowering by low-density lipoprotein apheresis on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: Japan Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Coronary Atherosclerosis Prospective Study (L-CAPS)

Twenty-five heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemic patients treated with LDL-apheresis and drugs and 11 patients treated with drugs underwent follow-up angiography 2.3 years later. One-hundred thirteen lesions were measured by quantitative angiography. Mean LDL-cholesterol levels during the trial were 140 +/- 34 mg/dl in the apheresis group and 170 +/- 58 mg/dl (P < 0.05) in the control group. The mean changes in minimal lumen diameter of lesions were +0.19 +/- 0.30 mm (improved) in the apheresis group (n = 76) and -0.44 +/- 0.40 mm (worsened) in the control group (n = 37) (P < 0.0001). When progression and regression were defined as a change in minimal lumen diameter of +/- 0.67 mm, in the apheresis group, two (8%) patients had progression, 19 (76%) stayed unchanged and four (16%) had regression, but in the control group seven (64%) patients had progression and four (36%) stayed unchanged. The frequency of regression or no change was significantly higher in the apheresis group than in the control group (P < 0.004). Intensive cholesterol lowering therapy with LDL-apheresis and lipid lowering drugs can achieve a substantial decrease in LDL-cholesterol levels to induce regression of coronary lesions in familial hypercholesterolemic patients with advanced coronary artery disease.

Application of bioaffinity technology in therapeutic extracorporeal plasmapheresis and large-scale fractionation of human plasma

This paper describes the increasingly unique and powerful role that affinity chromatography is occupying both as a tool for the treatment of extracorporeal plasma exchange (to discard biological compounds with noxious metabolic or immunologic effects in patients) and as a purification tool in the production of therapeutic plasma protein derivatives. Management of both applications requires careful monitoring of the parameters applied to the plasma material, to avoid immunological stimulation or activation of the coagulation cascade. Examples of direct current applications of affinity ligands in therapeutic removal and industrial production of plasma compounds are presented.

Therapeutic efficiency of lipoprotein(a) reduction by low-density lipoprotein immunoapheresis

This study was performed to investigate the effect of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) immunoapheresis on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] reduction in patients with heterozygous and homozygous familial hyperlipidemia (N=16) and insufficient response to lipid-lowering agents. By desorption of approximately 5,700+/-500 mL of plasma, a mean reduction in total cholesterol of 62% (P < .001) and in LDL-cholesterol of 70% (P < .001) was achieved. Lp(a), which was elevated at study entry in seven of these patients (82.1+/-34.3 mg/dL; range, 48 to 148 mg/dL), was reduced during the initial LDL-apheresis procedure by 74.8%+/-14.1% (P < .001). Long-term apheresis treatment performed at weekly intervals resulted in an mean reduction in Lp(a) pretreatment values to 39.1+/-28.5 mg/dL (-54%; P < .001). Desorbed Lp(a) was measured at the waste of the columns for 31 apheresis treatments. Lp(a) concentration of the column waste was higher in patients with elevated serum Lp(a) pretreatment values as compared with those with Lp(a) serum values within the normal range (elevated Lp(a), 1,420+/-380 mg; without elevated Lp(a), 235+/-190 mg; P < .001). The rate of return of Lp(a) following apheresis treatment scheduled at weekly intervals was comparable to that of LDL-cholesterol.

Aortic stiffness in young patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is a primary risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. Aortic distensibility is an important determinant of left ventricular function and coronary blood flow whose possible alterations in patients with dyslipidemia have not been fully investigated.

METHODS

To assess the effect of dyslipidemia on the elastic properties of the aorta, we studied 60 patients (mean age 37+/-11 years) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and no manifest arterial disease and compared them with 20 of their normolipidemic siblings (mean age 34+/-10 years). Two indexes of the aortic elastic properties were measured: aortic distensibility was calculated by use of the formula: 2 x (AoS-AoD)/PP x AoD, and aortic stiffness index was calculated by use of the formula: In (SBP/DBP)/(AoS-AoD)/AoD, where AoS and AoD are aortic root end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters, respectively, SBP and DBP are systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, respectively, and PP is pulse pressure. Internal aortic root diameters were measured at 3 cm above the aortic valve by use of two-dimensional guided M-mode transthoracic echocardiography, and arterial pressure was measured simultaneously at the brachial artery by sphygmomanometry.

RESULTS

The mean aortic systolic and diastolic diameter index did not differ significantly between the two groups. In contrast, aortic distensibility was found to be significantly reduced in subjects with isolated familial hypercholesterolemia compared with that in the control group (2.15+/-1.72 cm2.dynes(-1).10(-6) vs 3.18+/-1.58 cm2.dynes(-1).10(-6), p < 0.02). In addition, the mean aortic stiffness index was double in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia compared with that in normolipidemic subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe dyslipidemia does not overtly influence aortic dimensions but leads to impairment of aortic elastic properties before the occurrence of clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic disease.

Long-term effects of low-density lipoprotein apheresis using an automated dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption system. Liposorber Study Group

The short-term effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis using a dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption column technique was previously examined in a 9-center, 22-week controlled trial in 64 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who did not adequately respond to diet and drug therapy. Forty-nine patients (40 treatment, 9 controls) subsequently received LDL apheresis procedures as part of an optional follow-up phase. This study reports on the long-term safety, lipid lowering, and clinical efficacy of LDL apheresis for the 5-year period that includes both the initial controlled study and follow-up phase. During this time, patients received a total of 3,902 treatments of which 3,314 treatments were given during the follow-up phase. Adverse events were infrequent, occurring in 142 procedures (3.6%). Immediate reduction in LDL cholesterol was 76% both in homozygotes and in heterozygotes. Patients with homozygous FH had a progressive decrease in pretreatment LDL cholesterol level along with an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level. There was no appreciable change in pretreatment lipoprotein level over time in heterozygotes. The rate of cardiovascular events during therapy with LDL apheresis and lipid-lowering drugs was 3.5 events per 1,000 patient-months of treatment compared with 6.3 events per 1,000 patient-months for the 5 years before LDL apheresis therapy. These findings support the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of LDL apheresis in patients with heterozygous and homozygous FH who are inadequately controlled with drug therapy.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis using the Liposorber system: features of the system and clinical benefits

LDL apheresis using the Liposorber system is indicated for use to remove selectively LDL from the plasma of hypercholesterolemic patients for whom diet and maximum cholesterol-lowering drug therapy have been ineffective or not tolerated. The dextran sulfate immobilized to porous cellulose beads is contained in the adsorption column as the adsorbent. The dextran sulfate has a structure similar to that of the LDL receptor and seems to act as a type of pseudoreceptor for LDL. There have been reported a number of clinical benefits using the Liposorber system for drug refractory hypercholesterolemic patients. Among them, the improvement of endothelial cell function of coronary and brachial arteries by a single treatment is the focus of the world's attention. Moreover, it is also noteworthy that LDL apheresis reduced the incidence of the cardiac events by 70% compared to drug therapy alone. In addition to the clinical benefits of the Liposorber system on familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), the preliminary data suggest that LDL apheresis may improve arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities and focal glomerular sclerosis (FGS).

Plasma cholesterol regulates soluble cell adhesion molecule expression in familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemia is associated with endothelial dysfunction. On the basis of the hypothesis that high plasma cholesterol per se may be a sufficient stimulus to upregulate endothelial adhesiveness and that this phenomenon might be reversible, soluble endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecules (sELAMs) were studied in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia undergoing LDL apheresis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Selective LDL absorption by dextran sulfate columns was used to treat plasma volumes of 6.5 to 9.2 L; after LDL apheresis, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a) levels were reduced by 74%, 82%, 79%, 56%, and 86%, respectively. Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and sELAM- were measured before, immediately after, and 2 and 6 days after LDL apheresis. Basal sICAM-1 and sELAM-1 values were higher than in healthy control subjects. After LDL apheresis, they decreased (P<.0001 and P<.0004, respectively); their removal by extracorporeal circulation components was excluded. Individual pretreatment and posttreatment values of sICAM-1 and sELAM-1 were positively correlated (P<.0001 and P<.001, respectively) with total cholesterol; their rebound curves showed patterns similar to the total cholesterol rebound curve but not to the triglyceride and lipoprotein(a) curves.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of changes in clinical chemical parameters, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and acute-phase reactant proteins, these results confirm in a clinical setting the upregulation of endothelial adhesiveness observed in experimental hypercholesterolemia and suggest a direct role for cholesterol in regulating this phenomenon, at least in familial hypercholesterolemia.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for prevention and regression of atherosclerosis: clinical results

Hypercholesterolemia can be adequately controlled by appropriate diet and maximum lipid lowering drug therapy in most patients. Nevertheless, there exists a group of patients, including those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), who remain at high risk for the development or progression of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). For these patients additional measures such as surgery and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis have to be considered. The objective of this multicenter trial, which included 30 clinical centers (28 in Germany and one each in Scotland and Luxembourg), was to determine if repeated LDL apheresis using the Liposorber LA-15 system (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) could lead to an additional acute and time averaged lowering of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in severely hypercholesterolemic patients whose cholesterol levels could not be controlled by appropriate diet and maximum drug therapy. A total of 6,798 treatments were performed on 120 patients, including 8 with homozygous FH, 75 with heterozygous FH, and 37 with unclassified FH or other hyperlipidemias from 1988 through 1994. The mean TC and mean LDL-C levels at baseline were 410.0 mg/dl and 333.9 mg/dl, respectively. LDL apheresis was performed once a week or at least once every 2 weeks in all patients. During treatment with the Liposorber system the mean acute percentage reduction was 52.6% for TC and 63.1% for LDL-C. Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) were also substantially reduced to 60.6% and 47.5%, respectively. Fibrinogen, a potential risk factor for CHD, was reduced by 26.2%. In contrast, the mean acute reduction of high density lipoprotein (HDL) was only 3.4%. During the course of the treatment, the time averaged levels of TC and LDL-C were reduced by approximately 39% and 50%, respectively, compared to baseline levels. The adverse events (AEs) were those generally associated with extracorporeal treatments. The most common AE was hypotension, with 69 episodes corresponding to 1% of all treatments reported in 44 of the 120 patients treated. All other kinds of AEs occurred in less than 0.2% of the treatments. The treatment with the Liposorber LA-15 system was overall well tolerated. It should be noted, however, that a more severe type of hypotensive reaction associated with flush, bradycardia, and dyspnea was reported in patients taking concomitant angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor medication. Except for such anaphylactoid-like reactions associated with the intake of ACE inhibitors, the Liposorber LA-15 system represents a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients suffering from severe hypercholesterolemia that could not be adequately controlled by diet and maximum drug therapy.

Clinical experience and future directions for low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the United States

The United States Liposorber Study was a 22 week randomized controlled study of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis with an optional follow-up phase. The procedure was found to acutely lower LDL cholesterol by up to 81%, have good tolerability, and produce a reduction in the frequency of cardiovascular events. Studies outside the United States have found therapy with LDL apheresis to be associated with a favorable clinical outcome including improved myocardial perfusion, but variable regression of coronary artery disease (CAD). Improvement in blood viscosity and endothelial function may help explain the symptomatic benefits observed with relatively small changes in angiography. Based upon favorable clinical experience, LDL apheresis using dextran sulfate cellulose columns has recently received approval for commercialization in the United States in patients with inadequate responses to diet and drug therapy and LDL levels > or = 200 mg with CAD present or LDL levels > or = 300 mg/dl without CAD.