Effect on prognosis of abolition of exercise-induced painless myocardial ischemia by medical therapy

Identifying which patients with diabetes should be tested for the presence of coronary artery disease – The importance of baseline electrocardiogram and exercise testing

Numerous studies have reported that diabetic patients should not always be considered to be coronary artery disease (CAD)-equivalent as was previously suggested. Exercise testing is widely available at a relatively low cost, and even among patients in whom the diagnosis of CAD is highly probable on the basis of age, sex, description of chest pain and history of prior myocardial infarction, exercise testing is often a clinical requirement for risk or prognosis assessment to determine the need for possible coronary angiography or revascularization. Nevertheless, because of either the presence of atypical symptoms or the absence of symptoms often encountered, the screening approach may differ in patients with diabetes mellitus. Because CAD is the major cause of mortality in patients with diabetes, its early detection is important to improve medical interventions and outcomes. This is critical because the available evidence suggests that occult CAD is common among asymptomatic patients with diabetes. Therefore, noninvasive testing for asymptomatic CAD may be helpful for the identification of diabetic patients with severe coronary obstruction in whom revascularization therapy may be considered the first manifestation of silent CAD in patients with diabetes is a fatal cardiac event in approximately one-half of the patients. The present paper reviews some clinical markers that may be helpful to the clinician to increase the yield of finding significant occult CAD while screening patients with diabetes.

Silent myocardial ischemia: Recent developments

Silent myocardial ischemia is now in its fourth decade of recognition as a clinical syndrome within the spectrum of coronary artery disease. Prior decades have seen important research into the pathophysiology, detection, prevalence, prognosis, and therapy of this syndrome. More recent developments have continued to add data to each of these areas, with particular emphasis on the comparative value of various diagnostic procedures and the effect of therapy on prognosis. While controversy still exists concerning proper screening guidelines for the asymptomatic population, there is a growing consensus that some form of stress testing in high-risk individuals (ie, those with multiple coronary risk factors) is appropriate.

Atherosclerotic vascular disease: management of angina in the office setting

A discussion of primary care issues related to the management of angina in the office setting is warranted because of recent developments. These developments include new pharmacotherapies, recent insights into the pathophysiology of angina, and increased recognition of the role of the diseased endothelium in sequelae of coronary artery disease.

Rationale for the use of calcium antagonists in the treatment of silent myocardial ischemia

Silent myocardial ischemia, whether it occurs at rest or during exercise, is associated with an unfavorable prognosis and may lead to sudden cardiac death. Agents used to treat silent myocardial ischemia have included nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium antagonists (CAs). Despite treatment with traditional anti-ischemic agents, studies have shown that up to 40% of patients who receive what is considered to be clinically optimal antianginal therapy continue to have daily episodes of silent myocardial ischemia. The use of nitrates and beta-blockers is sometimes confounded by issues of tolerance and tolerability. Although the CAs have been found to be effective in decreasing the duration and frequency of episodes of silent ischemia, in general beta-blockers produce a greater reduction in these variables. Thus a need for effective and tolerable anti-ischemic agents persists. A new class of CAs, the tetralol derivatives, may show promise in this regard. The first of this new class, mibefradil, is characterized by selective blockade of T-type calcium-ion channels and has been shown in a few studies to reduce the frequency and duration of asymptomatic ischemic episodes in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Large-scale clinical trials are necessary before the efficacy and tolerability of this new CA can be compared fully with those of the beta-blockers and currently available CAs.

Efficacy of mibefradil compared with amlodipine in suppressing exercise-induced and daily silent ischemia: results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Mibefradil is a new benzimidazolyl-substituted tetraline-derivative calcium antagonist. Its vasodilatory activity combined with an ability to lower heart rate without negative inotropic effects as well as its long duration of action make it a promising anti-ischemic agent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred nine patients with coronary artery disease, stable angina pectoris, and positive exercise tests were randomized to receive mibefradil (50, 100, or 150 mg), amlodipine (10 mg), or placebo. The anti-ischemic effects of mibefradil on exercise test and silent ischemia parameters were assessed. At doses of 100 and 150 mg, mibefradil increased exercise duration (by 55.5 and 51.0 seconds, respectively; P<.001 for both), increased time to onset of angina (by 98.3 and 82.7 seconds, respectively; P<.001), and increased time to 1-mm ST depression (by 81.7 and 94.3 seconds, respectively; P<.001). By comparison, a 10 mg/d dose of amlodipine significantly improved only time to onset of angina (treatment effect: 38.5 seconds, P=.036). Mibefradil 100 mg and 150 mg decreased the number of episodes of silent ischemia (treatment effects: -3.1 and -3.6, respectively; P<.001) and the duration of silent ischemia (treatment effects: -9.2 minutes, P=.048, and -14.6 minutes, P=.002, respectively). The decrease in the number of episodes of silent ischemia was also statistically significant in the group receiving 10 mg of amlodipine (-1.5; P=.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily doses of 100 and 150 mg mibefradil were effective in improving exercise tolerance and reducing ischemic episodes during ambulatory monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease.

Mibefradil: A New Selective T-Channel Calcium Antagonist for Hypertension and Angina Pectoris

Calcium antagonists are an established therapy for patients with hypertension and angina pectoris, but their current usage is often limited by their pharmacologic profilers and side effects. Mibefradil is a recently developed calcium antagonist with a unique chemical structure, site of action, and set of pharmacologic effects. Unlike currently available calcium channels as well as L-type channels. It is further distinguished from the other calcium antagonists in that it is the first member of a new class of calcium antagonists, the tetralol derivatives. With chronic oral dosing, mibefradil attains steady-state plasma concentrations within 3-4 days, has a bioavailability of approximately 90%, and a plasma half-life of 17-25 hours. It has a gradual onset of action and can be administered once daily without regard to food intake. It increases coronary blood flow and lowers peripheral vascular resistance. The vasodilatory effects of mibefradil are associated with a lack of inotropic effect on myocardium, lack of neurohormonal activation, and a reduction in heart rate. In clinical trials it has been demonstrated to be an effective agent in the treatment of patients with hypertension and angina pectoris, with a good safety and tolerability profile regardless of age, gender, or race.

Daily life cardiac ischaemia. Should it be treated?

Daily life cardiac ischaemia is defined as reversible myocardial cellular hypoxia that occurs during activities of daily living, without artificial provocation. Most of these daily life ischaemic episodes are not associated with symptoms. However, it is not practical to distinguish silent versus symptomatic daily life ischaemia as both are associated with haemodynamic abnormalities and future adverse outcomes. Daily life cardiac ischaemia is best detected using ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring; however, there are other diagnostic tools (e.g. exercise treadmill) that can be used. Once detected, the optimal therapy for daily life myocardial ischaemia has yet to be identified. However, it does appear that usual antianginal medications including nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and antiplatelet drugs are effective in reducing the incidence and severity of daily life myocardial ischaemia. Medical therapy and revascularisation should be utilised to obliterate all episodes of daily life cardiac ischaemia to prevent future cardiac events. Moreover, the efficacy of the chosen therapeutic regimen for each patient should be documented with follow-up objective testing. The diagnosis and management of daily life myocardial ischaemia is continually evolving. Future research as well as economic considerations will shape future management strategies.

Medical treatment to reduce total ischemic burden: total ischemic burden bisoprolol study (TIBBS), a multicenter trial comparing bisoprolol and nifedipine. The TIBBS Investigators

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of bisoprolol on transient myocardial ischemia with those of nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina.

BACKGROUND

Both beta-adrenergic blocking agents and calcium antagonists reduce transient ischemic episodes, but comparisons of these agents have been made in only a few larger studies.

METHODS

The Total Ischemic Burden Bisoprolol Study (TIBBS) was a randomized double-blind controlled study with two parallel groups; 330 patients from 30 centers in seven European countries with stable angina pectoris, a positive exercise test and more than two transient ischemic episodes during 48 h of Holter monitoring (central evaluation) were included. Of these patients 161 were randomized to receive bisoprolol and 169 to receive nifedipine slow release. There were two treatment phases of 4 weeks each, with 48-h Holter monitoring after each phase. During phase 1, patients received either 10 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 20 mg of nifedipine slow release. During phase 2, they received either 20 mg of bisoprolol daily or 2 x 40 mg of nifedipine slow release.

RESULTS

In phase 1 of the trial, 4 weeks of bisoprolol therapy (10 mg daily) reduced the mean [+/- SD] number of transient ischemic episodes from 8.1 +/- 0.6 to 3.2 +/- 0.4/48 h. Nifedipine (2 x 20 mg) reduced transient ischemic episodes from 8.3 +/- 0.5 to 5.9 +/- 0.4/48 h. Total duration of ischemia was reduced from 99.3 +/- 10.1 to 31.9 +/- 5.5 min/48 h with bisoprolol and from 101 +/- 9.1 to 72.6 +/- 8.1 min/48 h with nifedipine. Reductions were statistically significant for both drugs; the difference between bisoprolol and nifedipine was also significant (p < 0.0001). Bisoprolol reduced the heart rate at onset of episodes by 13.7 +/- 1.4 beats/min from a baseline value of 99.5 +/- 1.2 beats/min (p < 0.001). Heart rate was unchanged with nifedipine. Bisoprolol had significantly higher responder rates than nifedipine. Doubling of the dose in phase 2 of the trial had small additive effects. Only bisoprolol showed a marked circadian effect by reducing the morning peak of transient ischemic episodes (by 68% at peak time, 8:00 to 8:59 AM).

CONCLUSIONS

Both bisoprolol and nifedipine reduced the number and duration of transient ischemic episodes in patients with chronic stable angina. Bisoprolol was significantly more effective than nifedipine in both doses tested and reduced the morning peak of ischemic activity.

Triggers of angina and ST-segment depression in ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease: evidence for an uncoupling of angina and ischemia

This study evaluated daily-life physical and mental triggers of painful and painless myocardial ischemia and of anginal pain in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) by using ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and a structured diary. Eighty-five percent of ambulant ischemic episodes occurred without chest pain; 66% of anginal pain reports were made in the absence of ischemic ST-segment depression. Chest pain reports in the absence of ischemia could not be attributed to "borderline" ST-segment changes. Compared with silent ischemia, painful ischemia was triggered at higher levels of physical activity (p < 0.05) and at higher levels of self-rated effort and negative emotion (p < 0.05). Painful episodes were associated with greater-magnitude ST depression (p < 0.02), but a substantial percentage of episodes with > or = 2 mm and > or = 3 mm ST depression were silent. These results reveal an uncoupling of anginal symptoms from ambulatory ischemic episodes in patients with CAD during daily life. In addition, specific activities and emotions correlate with the presence or absence of anginal symptoms as much as does the presence of ischemic ST depression. These results may have implications for antiischemic and antianginal treatment strategies.

Effects of treatment on outcome in mildly symptomatic patients with ischemia during daily life. The Atenolol Silent Ischemia Study (ASIST)

BACKGROUND

Detection of asymptomatic ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease has been associated with increased risk for adverse outcome, but treatment of patients with asymptomatic ischemia remains controversial. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine if treatment reduces adverse outcome in patients with daily life ischemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic outpatients with daily life silent ischemia due to coronary artery disease was conducted. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival at 1 year by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Events were death, resuscitated ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, aggravation of angina, or revascularization. The secondary outcome was ischemia during ambulatory ECG monitoring at 4 weeks. Three hundred six outpatients with mild or no angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II), abnormal exercise tests, and ischemia on ambulatory monitoring were randomized to receive either atenolol (100 mg/d) or placebo. After 4 weeks of treatment, the number (mean +/- SD, 3.6 +/- 4.2 versus 1.7 +/- 4.6 episodes, P < .001) and average duration (30 +/- 3.3 versus 16.4 +/- 6.7 minutes, P < .001) of ischemic episodes per 48 hours of ambulatory monitoring decreased in atenolol- compared with placebo-assigned patients (4.4 +/- 4.6 to 3.1 +/- 6.0 episodes and 36.6 +/- 4.1 to 30 +/- 5.5 minutes). Event-free survival improved in atenolol-treated patients (P < .0066), who had an increased time to onset of first adverse event (120 versus 79 days) and fewer total first events compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence intervals, 0.26 to 0.75; P = .001). There was a nonsignificant trend for fewer serious events (death, resuscitation from ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina) in atenolol-treated patients (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence intervals, 0.22 to 1.33; P = .175). The most powerful univariate and multivariate correlate of event-free survival was absence of ischemia on ambulatory monitoring at 4 weeks. Side effects were mild and generally similar comparing atenolol- and placebo-treated patients, although bradycardia was more frequent with atenolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Atenolol treatment reduced daily life ischemia and was associated with reduced risk for adverse outcome in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with placebo.

Concomitant use of nitrates, calcium channel blockers, and beta blockers for optimal antianginal therapy

Despite the introduction of new mechanical techniques for revascularization, pharmacologic therapy continues to be the mainstay of antianginal therapy. The conventional antianginal medications, which include nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers, act to correct the imbalance between myocardial supply and demand by increasing coronary blood flow, reducing myocardial oxygen requirements, or both. All three are appropriate for the management of angina caused by a fixed coronary obstruction, but nitrates and calcium channel blockers, which not only reduce demand but also increase supply, are preferred in cases of angina believed to involve a significant increase in vasomotor tone. Because of the different yet complementary mechanisms of action of the three classes of anti-ischemic drugs, use of these agents in combination is a rational approach to the treatment of angina unresponsive to monotherapy. Such combinations have been shown to enhance the therapeutic response achieved with single-agent therapy. In addition, the pharmacologic action of one of the components of the combination regimen may serve to offset side effects typically associated with the other.

The Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study: design of a randomized clinical trial, baseline data and implications for a long-term outcome trial

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot were 1) to compare the 12-week efficacy of three treatment strategies to suppress cardiac ischemia, and 2) to assess the feasibility of a prognosis trial in patients with asymptomatic cardiac ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ischemia has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, most cardiac ischemia is asymptomatic, and although therapeutic strategies ranging from no medication to revascularization are being used to treat ischemia, no prospective study evaluating different treatment strategies has been reported.

METHODS

Patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and ischemia on exercise and ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) in 11 clinical units were randomized to receive angina-guided medical therapy, angina-guided plus ambulatory ECG ischemia-guided medical therapy or revascularization (coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery). Patients were also randomized to receive either diltiazem plus isosorbide dinitrate or atenolol plus nifedipine when possible. After anti-ischemic medication adjustment to control angina, blinded medication was adjusted in the medical therapy groups to eliminate ischemia in the ischemia-guided group. The primary outcome was the absence of ischemia at 12 weeks. Follow-up was scheduled for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 1,959 patients were screened by ambulatory ECG monitoring; 982 (49%) had asymptomatic ischemia, and 618 (65%) were enrolled in the study. Most patients were men, were > 60 years old and had two or more ischemic episodes, early positive exercise tests and multivessel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Design and baseline data for a pilot study of ischemia treatment strategies are described.

Silent myocardial ischemia: to treat or not to treat?

The risk of infarction and sudden death is considerable in patients with silent ischemia, whether it occurs alone or is interspersed with episodes of angina. The ischemic activity can be modified or even abolished, most effectively with beta-blocker and nitrate therapy. But it is not yet clear whether treatment improves outcome, although the limited available data suggest that it does.

Suppression of inducible painless myocardial ischemia by conventional medical therapy: effect on short-term outcome and left ventricular systolic function

To test the hypothesis that abolition of exercise-induced painless myocardial ischemia by anti-ischemic medication improves prognosis in patients with medically treated coronary artery disease, we studied such patients with painless ischemia during exercise radionuclide ventriculography performed after temporary discontinuation of medication. The test was repeated while patients received conventional medical therapy that rendered angina no worse than New York Heart Association class I. The relative risk of adverse cardiac events was reduced by > 5-fold when painless ischemia was abolished by symptom-dictated therapy. Thus, the abolition of exercise-induced painless ischemia by conventional medical therapy carries a better short-term prognosis in medically treated coronary artery disease, suggesting that therapeutic efficacy may need to be assessed by titration against ischemia and not angina. In patients without overt cardiac events, there were no significant differences between baseline and 12-month measurements of ejection fraction at rest, peak exercise, and the change in ejection fraction from rest to exercise. Thus, in those who remain asymptomatic and event-free, painless ischemia that is easily inducible at baseline despite medication does not lead per se to deterioration of left ventricular systolic function at rest or during exercise over 12 months. Such an effect, if evident as early as at 12 months, would favor a strategy of early revascularization over medical treatment in asymptomatic patients who have inducible painless ischemia despite medication.

Long-term effect of inducible silent ischaemia on left ventricular systolic function

Silent myocardial ischaemia is readily detected by exercise radionuclide ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. In those who remain asymptomatic and event-free, it is not known whether silent ischaemia which is inducible despite anti-ischaemic medication exerts an insidious detrimental effect on left ventricular function. To study this, 34 medically treated patients (mean age 57; 26 men) underwent prospective measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during rest and exercise radionuclide ventriculography without interruption of anti-ischaemic medication at baseline and 12 months later. There was no significant mean (standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) deterioration from baseline to 12 months in LVEF at rest (50% v 49%, SD 5; 95% CI = -3 to +1), peak exercise (44% v 45%, SD 8; 95% CI = -1 to +4) and the change in LVEF from rest to exercise (-6% v -4%, SD 7; 95% CI = -1 to +5). Thus, in coronary artery disease patients who remain asymptomatic and event-free on medical therapy, silent myocardial ischaemia which is readily inducible at baseline despite medication does not lead per se to deterioration of left ventricular systolic function at rest or exercise over 12 months.

New insights into the management of myocardial ischemia

Episodes of ST depression are closely related to transient decreases in regional myocardial perfusion during physical or mental stress. At the onset of these events, there is transient constriction of atherosclerotic stenoses, with an increase in myocardial demand as reflected by increases in heart rate and blood pressure. Recent research has shown that normal epicardial coronary arteries respond to these provocations and to increasing blood flow with progressive vasodilation. In contrast, atherosclerotic vessels lose this ability to dilate and may show paradoxical constriction. This abnormal constriction parallels the response of the arteries to acetylcholine, which can be used to assess the ability of the coronary endothelium to regulate vasodilation. The loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation appears to be an important functional manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis and a potential triggering mechanism for transient ischemia. Dysfunctional endothelium may also result in a procoagulant surface, with cell adherence and local thrombus formation. Restoration of normal endothelial function is likely to emerge as an important therapeutic objective in the management of myocardial ischemia and coronary atherosclerosis.