Clinical use of serum digoxin concentrations

Clinical Use of Digitalis: A State of the Art Review

The history of digitalis is rich and interesting, with the first use usually attributed to William Withering and his study on the foxglove published in 1785. However, some knowledge of plants with digitalis-like effects used for congestive heart failure (CHF) was in evidence as early as Roman times. The active components of the foxglove (Digitalis purpurea and Digitalis lanata) are classified as cardiac glycosides or cardiotonic steroids and include the well-known digitalis leaf, digitoxin, and digoxin; ouabain is a rapid-acting glycoside usually obtained from Strophanthus gratus. These drugs are potent inhibitors of cellular membrane sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase). For most of the twentieth century, digitalis and its derivatives, especially digoxin, were the available standard of care for CHF. However, as the century closed, many doubts, especially regarding safety, were raised about their use as other treatments for CHF, such as decreasing the preload of the left ventricle, were developed. Careful attention is needed to maintain the serum digoxin level at ≤ 1.0 ng/ml because of the very narrow therapeutic window of the medication. Evidence for benefit exists for CHF with reduced ejection fraction (EF), also referred to as heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF), especially when considering the combination of mortality, morbidity, and decreased hospitalizations. However, the major support for using digoxin is in atrial fibrillation (AF) with a rapid ventricular response when a rate control approach is planned. The strongest support of all for digoxin is for its use in rate control in AF in the presence of a marginal blood pressure, since all other rate control medications contribute to additional hypotension. In summary, these days, digoxin appears to be of most use in HFrEF and in AF with rapid ventricular response for rate control, especially when associated with hypotension. The valuable history of the foxglove continues; it has been modified but not relegated to the garden or the medical history book, as some would advocate.

Digoxin remains useful in the management of chronic heart failure

Despite the introduction of a variety of new classes of drugs for the management of heart failure, digoxin continues to have an important role in long-term outpatient management. A wide variety of placebo-controlled clinical trials have unequivocally shown that treatment with digoxin can improve symptoms, quality of life, and exercise tolerance in patients with mild, moderate, or severe heart failure. These benefits are evident regardless of the underlying rhythm (normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation), etiology of the heart failure, or concomitant therapy (eg. ACE inhibitors). Unlike other agents with positive inotropic properties, digoxin does not increase all-cause mortality and has a substantial benefit in reducing heart failure hospitalizations. Consensus guidelines have recently been published by the Heart Failure Society of America and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, and they contain the following recommendations for digoxin treatment: 1. Digoxin should be considered for the outpatient treatment of all patients who have persistent symptoms of heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) despite conventional pharmacologic therapy with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and a beta-blocker when the heart failure is caused by systolic dysfunction (the strength of evidence = A for NYHA class II and III; strength of evidence = C for NYHA class IV). 2. Digoxin is not indicated as primary treatment for the stabilization of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. (Strength of evidence = B). Digoxin may be initiated after emergent treatment of heart failure has been completed in an effort to establish a long-term treatment strategy. 3. Digoxin should not be administered to patients who have significant sinus or atrioventricular block, unless the block has been treated with a permanent pacemaker (strength of evidence = B). The drug should be used cautiously in patients who receive other agents known to depress sinus or atrioventricular nodal function (such as amiodarone or a beta-blocker) (strength of evidence = B). 4. The dosage of digoxin should be 0.125-0.25 mg daily in the majority of patients (strength of evidence = C). The lower dose should be used in patients over 70 years of age, those with impaired renal function, or those with a low lean body mass. Higher doses (eg, digoxin 0.375-0.50 mg daily) are rarely needed. Loading doses of digoxin are not necessary during initiation of therapy for patients with chronic heart failure. 5. Serial assessment of serum digoxin levels is unnecessary in most patients. The radioimmunoassay was developed to assist in the evaluation of toxicity, not the efficacy of the drug. There appears to be little relationship between serum digoxin concentration and the drug's therapeutic effects. 6. Digoxin toxicity is commonly associated with serum levels >2 ng/mL but may occur with lower digoxin levels if hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, or hypothyroidism coexist. Likewise, the concomitant use of agents such as quinidine, verapamil, spironolactone, flecainide, and amiodarone can increase serum digoxin levels and increase the likelihood of digoxin toxicity. 7. For patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response, the administration of high doses of digoxin (>0.25 mg daily) for the purpose of rate control is not recommended. When necessary, additional rate control should be achieved by the addition of beta-blocker therapy or amiodarone (strength of evidence = C). If amiodarone is added, the dose of digoxin should be reduced. Digitalis preparations are now entering their fourth century of clinical use for the treatment of chronic heart failure symptoms. Its clinical efficacy can no longer be doubted and its safety has been verified by the multicenter DIG trial. Future advances in pharmacogenetics should facilitate identification of those patients most likely to benefit from its pharmacologic effects.

Analytical performance of a monoclonal digoxin assay by dry chemistry on the Vitros 950

Digoxin assay in plasma/serum samples is used for therapeutic measurements as a guide to clinical management of cardiac patients. A thin dry film multilayer monoclonal immunoassay for digoxin, Vitros, was evaluated for analytical performance. The effect of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) was studied assaying plasma samples taken from 100 renal disease patients, 62 hepatic disease patients and 40 pregnant women not receiving digoxin. The Vitros digoxin assay was compared with the AxSym digoxin II assay using plasma samples from 180 patients treated with digoxin. The results revealed satisfactory precision and accuracy for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes: the coefficient of variation (CV%) was lower than 5%; results for dilutions were linear in the range 0.4-3.9 microlg/L and mean analytical recovery was 105%. Measurable DLIS concentrations were observed in 29% of hepatic disease patients and in 7% of renal disease patients with apparent digoxin concentration ranging from 0.4 to 0.75 microg/L. The incidence of DLIS was comparable to that observed with AxSym digoxin II. Comparative results from patient samples gave a regression line equation: Yvitros 950=0.96XAxym +0.14, r=0.89. The data revealed a mean difference of 0.09+/-0.26 microg/L significantly greater than zero (p=0.02). We concluded that Vitros digoxin assay for precision, accuracy and extent of DLIS interference may be a good method for therapeutic drug monitoring; care needs to be taken since assay results generated by Vitros and AxSym analysers are not necessarily interchangeable.

A case series of hospitalized patients with elevated digoxin levels

PURPOSE

Although there is renewed enthusiasm for the use of digoxin in patients with heart failure, current dosing guidelines are based on a nomogram published in 1974. We studied the incidence of and risk factors for elevated digoxin levels in patients admitted to a community hospital, and compared their dosage regimens to published guidelines.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all patients who had serum digoxin levels greater than 2.4 ng/mL during a 6-month period. We collected demographic and clinical data, indications for digoxin use, digoxin dosage, concurrent medications, laboratory data, and clinical and electrocardiographic features of digoxin toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 1,433 patients with digoxin assays, 115 (8%) patients had elevated levels. Of the 82 patients with complete records and correctly timed digoxin levels, 59 (72%) had electrocardiographic or clinical features of digoxin toxicity. Patients with serum digoxin levels >2.4 ng/mL were slightly older (78 +/- 8 versus 73 +/- 9 years of age; P = 0.12) and had greater serum creatinine levels (3.1 +/- 7.3 versus 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL; P = 0.01) than those with levels < or =2.4 ng/mL. Forty-seven patients had elevated digoxin levels on admission, including 21 patients admitted for digoxin toxicity. Impaired or worsening renal function contributed to high levels in 37 patients, and a drug interaction was a contributory factor in 10 cases. Twenty (43%) of these patients were taking the recommended maintenance dose based on the scheme employed in the Digitalis Investigation Group study. Thirty-five patients developed high digoxin levels while in hospital. In 26 patients, this followed a loading dose of digoxin for the control of rapid atrial fibrillation. Impaired renal function was implicated in all of these patients. Despite the elevated digoxin level, rate control was achieved in only 11 patients of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated digoxin levels and clinical toxicity remains a common adverse drug reaction. Elderly patients, particularly those with impaired renal function and low body weights, are at the greatest risk. As published digoxin nomograms often result in toxicity, clinical variables need to be monitored. In patients with congestive heart failure and normal sinus rhythm the potential benefit of digoxin is small; thus, patients should receive a dose that minimizes the risk of toxicity. For patients with new onset atrial fibrillation, other agents may be preferable for rate control.

Monitoring blood levels of selected drugs. Remember to factor in the many confounding variables

Appropriate use of various pharmacologic agents involves not only awareness of therapeutic indications and side effects but also familiarity with clinical use and timing of blood level monitoring. The effective as well as the toxic level of antiepileptic drugs varies widely among patients, so the patient's response is more important than the serum drug level. These agents may interact with other disease states, other drugs, and even other antiepileptic agents. Because of digoxin's long half-life and the effect of physical exercise on serum concentration, the timing of serum collection is important. The usefulness of measuring amiodarone serum concentrations is controversial, but findings may help identify patients at risk for side effects related to the drug. Procainamide has a very short half-life and concentrations change over a short period, so blood levels of this agent should be measured before administration of a dose. The dose of levothyroxine required to restore a normal thyroid hormone level varies with age, coexistent conditions, and use of other medications. After the appropriate dose is determined, follow-up monitoring yearly is necessary (more often in the elderly). Efficacy and toxicity of theophylline are directly related to serum concentrations, and a reduced target level of 5 to 15 micrograms/mL has recently been suggested. Proper monitoring is important, because metabolic changes and drug interactions can cause either subtherapeutic or toxic levels.

Ouabain-sensitive Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity in toad brain

Toads of the genus Bufo are highly resistant to the toxic effects of digitalis glycosides, and the Na+,K(+)-ATPase of all toad tissues studied to date has been relatively insensitive to inhibition by digitalis and related compounds. In studies of brain microsomal preparations from two toad species, Bufo marinus and Bufo viridis, inhibition of ATPase activity and displacement of [3H]ouabain from Na+,K(+)-ATPase occurred over broad ranges of ouabain or bufalin concentrations, consistent with the possibility that more than one Na+,K(+)-ATPase isoform may be present in toad brain. The data could be fitted to one- or two-site models, both of which were consistent with the presence of Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity with high sensitivity to ouabain and bufalin. Ki (concentration capable of producing 50% inhibition of activity) values for ouabain in the one-site model were in the 0.2 to 3.7 microM range, whereas Ki1 values in the two-site model ranged from 0.085 to 0.85 microM, indicating that brain ATPase was at least three orders of magnitude more sensitive to ouabain than B. marinus bladder ATPase (Ki = 5940 microM). Ouabain was also an effective inhibitor of 86Rb+ uptake in B. marinus brain tissue slices (Ki = 3.1 microM in the one-site model; Ki1 = 0.03 microM in the two-site model). However, the relative contribution of the high ouabain-sensitivity site to the total activity was 17% in the transport assay as compared with 63% in the Na+,K(+)-ATPase enzymatic assay. We conclude that a highly ouabain-sensitive Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity is present and functional in toad brain but that its function may be partially inhibited in vivo.

Itraconazole increases serum digoxin concentration

Itraconazole can interact with several drugs by inhibiting their metabolism. Many drugs known to increase serum digoxin concentration are inhibitors of CYP enzymes (e.g. verapamil, diltiazem, amiodarone, cyclosporine). Case reports suggest that itraconazole, added to digoxin therapy, may induce digoxin intoxications; hence we wanted to study their possible interaction. In this two-phase study ten healthy young volunteers ingested 0.25 mg of digoxin daily for 20 days. Concomitantly, they received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once daily for 10 days in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study design. Serum concentrations of digoxin and itraconazole were measured (12 hr after administration) on days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20. Digoxin concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and confirmed (days 10 and 20) by affinity column-mediated immunoassay. Itraconazole increased serum digoxin concentration in each of the subjects. On the 10th day of the placebo phase serum digoxin concentration was 1.0 +/- 0.1 nmol/l, and on the 10th day of the itraconazole phase 1.8 +/- 0.1 nmol/l (P < 0.001). Care should be taken if itraconazole is prescribed to patients using digoxin. The mechanism of the itraconazole-digoxin interaction is unclear but may be related to CYP3A4-mediated changes in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Value of digoxin in heart failure and sinus rhythm: new features of an old drug?

Digoxin has been a controversial drug since its introduction >200 years ago. Although its efficacy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation is clear, its value in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm has often been questioned. In the 1980s, reports of some large-scale trials indicated that digoxin, with or without vasodilators or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, reduced signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure and improved exercise tolerance. This beneficial influence was mainly found in patients with more advanced heart failure and dilated ventricles, whereas the effect in those with mild disease appeared to be less pronounced. In the last few years, new data have shown that digoxin may also have clinical value in mild heart failure, either when used in combination with other drugs or when administered alone. As neurohumoral activation has increasingly been recognized to be a contributing factor in the disease progression of chronic heart failure, the modulating effects of digoxin on neurohumoral and autonomic status have received more attention. Also, there is evidence that relatively low doses of digoxin may be at least as effective as higher doses and have a lower incidence of side effects. Further, the recognition that the use of digoxin too early after myocardial infarction may be harmful and the development of other drugs, in particular angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, have obviously changed the place of digoxin in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The large-scale survival trial by the Digitalis Investigators Group (DIG), whose preliminary results have recently been presented, has shown that although digoxin has a neutral effect on total mortality during long-term treatment, it reduces the number of hospital admissions and deaths due to worsening heart failure. The potentially new features of the old drug digoxin are discussed in this review.

Changing physician behavior in ordering digoxin assays

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability to modify physicians' use of serum digoxin assays in a sustained fashion through (1) an educational intervention by a clinical pharmacist, and (2) changes in the computerized medical information system.

DESIGN

A before/after methodology was used to compare test use by hospital staff physicians in two phases. Phase 1 was an educational intervention conducted by a clinical pharmacist with an 8-month follow-up. Phase 2 was a medical information system intervention with a 12-month follow-up.

PATIENTS

Adult inpatients from July 1990 through December 1993 who received either digoxin therapy or at least one serum digoxin assay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Digoxin assays per patient day while receiving digoxin (assays/digoxin day), in-hospital mortality, and length of stay were compared before and after implementation of the interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 9468 patients received a digoxin and/or serum digoxin assay. Baseline use of serum digoxin assays was 0.178 assays/digoxin day. Following phase 1, the educational intervention, use declined 20.2% to 0.142 assays/digoxin day (p < 0.03). After phase 2, the implementation of changes in the medical information system, digoxin assay use was maintained at 16.3% less than that at baseline (p < 0.03). Patient mortality was unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

A low-intensity educational intervention by a clinical pharmacist supplemented by medical information system modification resulted in an important decrease in the use of digoxin assays. The change in physician behavior was sustained for more than 18 months. The model presented is not labor intensive, does not require continuous maintenance by healthcare personnel for a sustained effect, and may be widely applicable to healthcare providers.

Falsely elevated serum digoxin levels secondary to endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances

Endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) are produced by the human body and can be significantly elevated in specific clinical conditions. Commercially available digoxin assays do not have the specificity to fully distinguish DLIS from exogenous digoxin, though DLIS do not possess the same therapeutic properties as do the drug. The resultant artificial elevation of a reported digoxin level or a completely factitious level in a patient not taking the drug can have clinically significant consequences.

A controlled study on oral propafenone versus digoxin plus quinidine in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

Eighty-seven patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation (< or = 8 days) without clinical signs of heart failure were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: (i) oral propafenone (600 mg as a loading dose followed after 8 h by 300 mg t.i.d.); (ii) intravenous digoxin as acute scheme (up to 1.125 mg/24 h) followed after 6 h by hydroquinidine chlorhydrate (total dose, 1350 mg); or (iii) placebo. The patients were submitted to Holter monitoring for 48 h.

RESULTS

propafenone achieved higher successful conversion rates at 6, 12 and 24 h compared either with placebo (62% vs. 17%, 83% vs. 34%; 86% vs. 55%; P < 0.01, respectively) or with digoxin at 6 h (62% vs. 38%; P < 0.05) and digoxin plus quinidine at 12 h (83% vs. 48%; P < 0.05). At 48 h, a placebo conversion rate of 76% was observed with consequent lack of any significant difference with the active treatments. Mean conversion times within 48 h were 267 +/- 238 min for propafenone, 648 +/- 631 min for digoxin plus quinidine (P < 0.01 vs. propafenone) and 893 +/- 622 min for placebo (P < 0.001 vs. propafenone). Propafenone and digoxin plasma levels were within the therapeutic range. Asymptomatic phases of atrial flutter with > or = 2:1 atrio-ventricular conduction ratio were observed during Holter monitoring, before conversion to sinus rhythm, in four patients treated with propafenone, in one patient taking digoxin plus quinidine and in four patients with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)