Influence of oral prazosin therapy on exercise hemodynamics in patients with severe chronic heart failure

Interactive effect of body posture on exercise-induced atrial natriuretic peptide release

The purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that supine exercise elicits a greater atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) response than upright exercise because of higher atrial filling pressure attained in the supine posture. Plasma ANP concentration ([ANP]) was measured during continuous graded supine and upright exercise in eight healthy men at rest after 4 min of cycling exercise at 31, 51, and 79% of posture-specific peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), after 2 min of cycling at posture-specific VO2 peak, and 5 and 15 min postexercise. [ANP] was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) above rest by 64, 140, and 228% during supine cycling at 51 and 79% and VO2 peak, respectively. During upright cycling, [ANP] was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) at 79% (60%) and VO2 peak (125%). After 15 min of postexercise rest, [ANP] remained elevated (P less than 0.05) only in the supine subjects. [ANP] was 63, 79, and 75% higher (P less than 0.05) in the supine than in the upright position during cycling at 51 and 79% and VO2 peak. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were not significantly (P greater than 0.05) different between positions in all measurement periods. Heart rates were lower (P less than 0.05) in the supine position compared with the upright position. In conclusion, these results suggest that supine exercise elicits greater ANP release independent of blood pressure and heart rate but presumably caused by greater venous return, central blood volume, and concomitant atrial filling pressure and stretch.

Treatment of congestive heart failure--state of the art and future trends

1. Cardiac failure is a clinical syndrome of symptoms and signs, which can be confirmed by imaging or invasive haemodynamic techniques. It may be caused by systolic or diastolic dysfunction, but systolic dysfunction rarely occurs alone. It is important to ascertain the degree to which each contributes, and the precise aetiology of the condition, particularly in relation to surgically correctable lesions. 2. Non-pharmacological approaches including weight loss, salt restriction and lifestyle changes may be beneficial in some patients, and diuretics, which reduce the load on the heart, are the traditional baseline therapy. 3. Digitalis has been used where problems with contractility predominate, but its beneficial effect has been disputed, and expectations of improvement in patients in sinus rhythm should not be too high. 4. Vasodilators have been considered as the next line of treatment. Arteriolar dilators tend to increase cardiac output, but have little effect on pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and venodilators tend to have the opposite effect. Probably both actions are necessary and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which have both, have proved effective in terms of symptoms and survival. 5. Various other inotropic agents have been tried. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors improve exercise tolerance, but may increase the probability of serious arrhythmias, already a significant cause of sudden death. beta 1-partial adrenoceptor agonists such as xamoterol have shown some promise, and anti-arrhythmic therapy has also been considered. 6. Drugs which prevent progression of myocardial damage would prove a great advance, and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and calcium channel blockers appear to have considerable potential in this area.

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of nicardipine hydrochloride in patients with heart failure

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects at rest and during exercise of a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, nicardipine hydrochloride, were studied in 10 patients with chronic heart failure. Acute intravenous administration of nicardipine resulted in a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. There was a significant increase in cardiac index, stroke volume index, and the left ventricular stroke work index. Cardiac index measured at peak exercise increased significantly when compared with the cardiac index obtained at peak exercise before the infusion. After 9 days of continuous therapy with nicardipine, 30 mg three times a day, a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance and a significant increase in the cardiac index, stroke volume index, and left ventricular stroke work index at rest were observed in response to a single oral dose of 30 mg nicardipine. Data at peak exercise were also obtained before and 2 hours after the oral administration of nicardipine. With this comparison there was a significant increase in cardiac index, stroke work index, and exercise duration. It is concluded that in this group of patients with severe chronic heart failure, nicardipine enhanced myocardial performance during rest and exercise and this enhancement is sustained after 9 days of oral therapy.

Trimazosin in chronic congestive heart failure: improved left ventricular function at rest and during exercise

The hemodynamic effects of the oral vasodilator trimazosin were evaluated in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), initially over a 72-hour period (13 patients), and after 3 months of maintenance therapy (seven patients). During the initial evaluation, cardiac index and stroke work index increased an average of 24% and 37% respectively, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased by 26%. These beneficial hemodynamic effects were maintained during supine bicycle exercise. After 3 months of maintenance therapy, cardiac index (+30%) and stroke work index (+38%) remained elevated, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was lower (-38%). Improved hemodynamics during exercise were also seen after maintenance therapy. Withdrawal of trimazosin was associated with deterioration in hemodynamics and left ventricular function. Thus trimazosin has the potential to cause sustained improvement in left ventricular function, both at rest and during exercise, in patients with chronic CHF.

Vasodilator therapy in chronic congestive heart failure

Vasodilator agents are relatively new additions to the armamentarium for the management of patients with congestive heart failure. Myocardial failure, irrespective of the aetiology, tends to create a vicious cycle characterised by reduced cardiac output and elevated systemic vascular resistance, which further decrease cardiac output by increasing left ventricular ejection impedance. The rationale for the use of vasodilators is to interrupt the vicious cycle by decreasing the left ventricular ejection impedance by peripheral vasodilatation. Although most vasodilator agents produce qualitatively similar haemodynamic responses, quantitatively their haemodynamic effects differ considerably. Knowledge of the haemodynamic effects of the various vasodilators helps in the selection of a particular drug for the management of such patients. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, haemodynamic effects, pharmacokinetics, clinical usage and adverse effects of non-parenteral vasodilator agents currently available for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.

Efficacy of prazosin in the management of chronic congestive heart failure: a 6-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The beneficial effects of acute prazosin therapy in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) have been well documented; however, its chronic efficacy over several months has not previously been evaluated in a placebo-controlled manner. Therefore, an assessment was made by radionuclide ventriculography of the effect of prazosin, 20 mg/day, on left ventricular ejection fraction and end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes at rest and on peak upright bicycle exercise, as well as its effect on right ventricular ejection fraction at rest, exercise time and work load, and standard clinical variables in 23 patients with stable class III symptoms of CHF. The study consisted of a 6-month randomized, double-blind, controlled evaluation of prazosin versus placebo in patients receiving a stable dose of digitalis and diuretics for at least 1 month. At entry, the prazosin and placebo groups did not differ in any respect. Prazosin caused no demonstrable effect on clinical variables such as status of symptoms, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and cardiothoracic ratio when compared with placebo. Prazosin also caused no demonstrable effect compared with placebo on absolute or percent changes in radionuclide variables at rest or on peak exercise, or on exercise time or exercise work load. In addition, prazosin had no consistent effect compared with placebo on plasma renin activity or plasma catecholamine levels. However, there was a slight but significant increase in weight (p less than 0.0001) and in plasma renin activity in the upright position (p less than 0.002) with time, as well as a tendency for the diuretic dose to increase with time in both groups. Thus, long-term prazosin therapy generally produces no demonstrable subjective or objective improvement in patients with stable, chronic class III CHF receiving digitalis and diuretic therapy.