Double-blind randomized study of prophylactic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in granulocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancies

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Modifications of the Gut Microbiota in Children with Cancer

In children with cancer, chemotherapy can produce cytotoxic effects, resulting in immunosuppression and an augmented risk of febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infections. This has led to widespread use of antibiotic prophylaxis which, combined with intensive chemotherapy treatment, could have a long-term effect on the gastrointestinal microbiome. In this review, we aimed to analyze the current literature about the widespread use of antibiotic prophylaxis in children experiencing infectious complications induced by chemotherapy and its effects on the gut microbiome. Our review of the literature shows that antimicrobial prophylaxis in children with cancer is still a trending topic and, at the moment, there are not enough data to define universal guidelines. Children with cancer experience long and painful medical treatments and side effects, which are associated with great economic and social burdens, important psychological consequences, and dysbiosis induced by antibiotics and also by chemotherapy. Considering the importance of a healthy gut microbiota, studies are needed to understand the impact of dysbiosis in response to therapy in these children and to define how to modulate the microbiome to favor a positive therapeutic outcome.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Associated Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but known adverse event associated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in adults. No studies to date have looked at the risk of this association in children. We systematically reviewed the evidence for a potential association between TMP-SMX and DILI in the pediatric population.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Web of Science was searched using a combination of terms to identify reports of TMP-SMX exposure, liver injury and pediatrics (≤18 years old). We included any studies with hepatic adverse events occurring after exposure to TMP-SMX. Bibliographies were reviewed for additional relevant references. The Narajno scale was used to assess causality in case studies.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were identified: 3 randomized trials, 1 prospective observational study, 8 retrospective observational studies and 10 case reports. Among the randomized trials and prospective studies, only mild, transient hepatic function abnormalities were reported. Retrospective observational studies reported 1 fatal DILI and statistically significant increased odds of DILI with TMP-SMX use compared with nonuse. Among the 10 case reports, severe liver outcomes and mild hepatic function abnormalities were both reported. Naranjo scores suggested reported hepatic adverse events were probably because of exposure in 5, possible in 4, and doubtful in 1 case report.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding DILI associated with TMP-SMX exposure in pediatrics is limited. Observational population studies show mild hepatic abnormalities. Case reports suggest more severe manifestations of DILI. Additional studies may reveal the association between TMP-SMX and DILI in pediatrics.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in children with cancer or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplantation

Bacterial infections are common in children with cancer and can lead to life-threatening complications. Infections in these patients mainly occur during neutropenic periods, and may be caused by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The patients at highest risk of serious infections include those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and those undergoing myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This is a review with the main aim of making a critical appraisal of the literature, and summarising what is currently known and can be recommended. The most significant studies support the use of floroquinolones (mainly ciprofloxacin) as the most rational approach to treat pediatric patients with probably long-lasting neutropenia, although trimetoprim-sulphametoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate may theoretically be valid alternatives. No prophylaxis seems to be needed for children with cancer without severe neutropenia. However, a global evaluation of the studies of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with cancer indicates that there are not enough data to prepare definite guidelines for its use or avoidance in pediatric oncology, and so further studies are needed. It is not only important to define the best antibiotic regimens for the children in whom such prophylaxis is useful, but also to identify precisely those who do not need it. This would avoid the antibiotic misuse that probably occurs at the moment because many low-risk children with cancer are treated. As prophylaxis against infections requires long-term adherence to an antibiotic regimen, the attitudes and beliefs of stakeholders need to be fully considered.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who are neutropenic following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of bacterial infections but not in reducing mortality rates. Our systematic review from 2006 also showed a reduction in mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This updated review aimed to evaluate whether there is still a benefit of reduction in mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), abstracts of conference proceedings and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic, to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.1 software.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and nine trials (involving 13,579 patients) that were conducted between the years 1973 to 2010 met the inclusion criteria. When compared with placebo or no intervention, antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of death from all causes (46 trials, 5635 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79) and the risk of infection-related death (43 trials, 5777 participants; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). The estimated number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one death was 34 (all-cause mortality) and 48 (infection-related mortality).Prophylaxis also significantly reduced the occurrence of fever (54 trials, 6658 participants; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87), clinically documented infection (48 trials, 5758 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.76), microbiologically documented infection (53 trials, 6383 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.62) and other indicators of infection.There were no significant differences between quinolone prophylaxis and TMP-SMZ prophylaxis with regard to death from all causes or infection, however, quinolone prophylaxis was associated with fewer side effects leading to discontinuation (seven trials, 850 participants; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.87) and less resistance to the drugs thereafter (six trials, 366 participants; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients significantly reduced all-cause mortality. In our review, the most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis outweighed the harm such as adverse effects and the development of resistance since all-cause mortality was reduced. As most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, we strongly recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for these patients, preferably with a quinolone. Prophylaxis may also be considered for patients with solid tumours or lymphoma.

Antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic children with cancer

During the period of neutropenia induced by chemotherapy, patients have a high risk of infection. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce neutropenia-related complications in patients with cancer is still disputed. Recent meta-analysis and clinical trials demonstrated that antibiotic prophylaxis with quinolones reduces febrile episodes, bacterial infections and mortality in adult oncological patients with neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in acute leukaemia. In paediatric patients, the only randomized, double-blind, prospective study until now suggests that amoxicillin/clavulanate may represent an effective prophylactic treatment in reducing fever and infections in oncological children with neutropenia, with an efficacy that is statistically demonstrated only in patients with acute leukaemia. Considering the risk of resistances, antibiotic-prophylaxis should be used only in selected patients.

Antibiotic prophylaxis during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia for patients with acute leukemia

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia places patients with acute leukemia at high risk for bacterial infections. A number of studies performed over the past 20 years have investigated the utility of prophylactic antimicrobials, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones, to prevent infection in the setting of mucositis and neutropenia. Many of these studies have found a benefit of prophylaxis in terms of the incidence of fever and bacterial infection. Clinical guidelines do not recommend antibacterial prophylaxis, however, in part because of increasing reports of infections due to resistant organisms, including fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli, fluoroquinolone-insensitive viridans streptococci, and Clostridium difficile. To effectively use prophylaxis and simultaneously limit emerging antibiotic resistance, only patients at high risk for bacterial infections should receive prophylaxis.

[Febrile neutropenia in adult patients with solid tumours: a review of literature toward a rational and optimal management]

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia represents a frequent emergency and evidence based management of this event remains an exigency for each patient. Appropriate use of antibiotics is mandatory, growth factors have to be proposed according to validated guidelines and benefits and risks of antiobioprophylaxy must be discussed. This review propose to summarize available data on these important questions, with a special focus on this management of febrile neutropenia in daily practice.

Antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic patients

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used for several decades to prevent infection in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its benefits have been debated just as long. Recent analysis suggests that quinolones may actually be life saving in high-risk groups such as acute leukaemia and autologous bone marrow transplant but these benefits are likely to be negated in the long term by the development of quinolone resistance.

Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions (which may include placebo or no treatment) for the prevention of oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Computerised searches of Cochrane Oral Health Group and PAPAS Trials Registers, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, SIGLE and LILACS were undertaken. Reference lists from relevant articles were searched and the authors of eligible trials were contacted to identify trials and obtain additional information. Date of the most recent searches: June 2006: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design - random allocation of participants; participants - anyone receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment for cancer; interventions - agents prescribed to prevent oral candidiasis; primary outcome - prevention of oral candidiasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were recorded on the following secondary outcomes if present: relief of pain, amount of analgesia, relief of dysphagia, incidence of systemic infection, duration of stay in hospital (days), cost of oral care, patient quality of life, death, use of empirical antifungal treatment, toxicity and compliance. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. The Cochrane Oral Health Group statistical guidelines were followed and risk ratios (RR) calculated using random-effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random-effects metaregression analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-eight trials involving 4226 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Drugs absorbed and partially absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract were found to prevent oral candidiasis when compared to a placebo, or a no treatment control group, with RR for absorbed drugs = 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.78). For absorbed drugs in populations with an incidence of 20% (mid range of results in control groups), this implies a NNT of 9 (95% CI 7 to 13) patients need to be treated to avoid one patient getting oral candidiasis. There was no significant benefit shown for drugs not absorbed from the GI tract.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence, from randomised controlled trials, that drugs absorbed or partially absorbed from the GI tract prevent oral candidiasis in patients receiving treatment for cancer. There is also evidence that these drugs are significantly better at preventing oral candidiasis than drugs not absorbed from the GI.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of bacterial infections, but not in reducing mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic patients reduced mortality when compared to placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches on The Cochrane Cancer Network Register of Trials (2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to 2004) and abstracts of conference proceedings; references of identified studies; the first author of each included trial was contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention, or another antibiotic to prevent bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from the included trials. Relative risks (RR) or average differences, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred trials (10,274 patients) performed between the years 1973 to 2004 met inclusion criteria. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk for death when compared with placebo or no intervention (RR, 0.66 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.81]). The authors estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) in order to prevent 1 death from all causes as 60 (95% CI 34 to 268). Prophylaxis resulted in a significant decrease in the risk of infection-related death, RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.74) and in the occurrence of fever, RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.82). A reduction in mortality was also evident when the more recently conducted quinolone trials were analysed separately. Quinolone prophylaxis reduced the risk for all-cause mortality, RR 0.52 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.84).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated that prophylaxis significantly reduced all-cause mortality. The most significant reduction in mortality was observed in trials assessing prophylaxis with quinolones. The benefit demonstrated in our review outweighs harm, such as adverse effects, and development of resistance, since all-cause mortality is reduced. Since most trials in our review were of patients with haematologic cancer, prophylaxis, preferably with a quinolone, should be considered for these patients.

Efficacy of oral prophylactic antibiotics in neutropenic afebrile oncology patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics in oncology patients is still a matter of debate. A systematic review was performed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of oral prophylactic antibiotics to decrease bacteraemia and infection-related mortality in oncology patients during neutropenic episodes. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane register of controlled trials were searched from 1966 until 2002. The main outcome was the number of patients with documented bacteraemia (Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteraemia) and infection related mortality. Data-extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A total of 22 trials met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen trials compared prophylaxis (quinolones or Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ)) to no prophylaxis. The incidence of Gram-negative bacteraemia decreased significantly (pooled OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.62) without an increase in Gram-positive bacteraemia. Quinolone-based regimens showed a stronger reduction in Gram-negative bacteraemia while TMP/SMZ based regimens were more effective in Gram-positive bacteraemia. Infection related mortality due to bacterial causes decreased with the use of prophylactic antibiotics (pooled OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88). No increase in fungaemia or fungal related mortality was seen with the use of oral prophylaxis. In conclusion, this study has shown that oral prophylactic antibiotics decreased Gram-negative bacteraemia and infection related mortality due to bacterial causes during neutropenic episodes in oncology patients.

Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions (which may include placebo or no treatment) for the prevention of oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, MEDLINE Pre-indexed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, SIGLE and LILACS were searched. Date of the most recent searches April 2004 (CENTRAL Issue 2, 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design - random allocation of participants; participants - anyone receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment for cancer; interventions - agents prescribed to prevent oral candidiasis; primary outcome - prevention of oral candidiasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were recorded on the following secondary outcomes if present: relief of pain, amount of analgesia, relief of dysphagia, incidence of systemic infection, duration of stay in hospital (days), cost of oral care, patient quality of life, death, use of empirical antifungal treatment, toxicity and compliance. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two reviewers (HW & JC). The Cochrane Oral Health Group statistical guidelines were followed and relative risk values calculated using random effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects metaregression analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-eight trials involving 4226 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Drugs absorbed and partially absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract were found to prevent oral candidiasis when compared to a placebo, or a no treatment control group, with RR for absorbed drugs = 0.47 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.78). For absorbed drugs in populations with an incidence of 20% (mid range of results in control groups), this implies a NNT of 9 (95% CI 7 to 13) patients need to be treated to avoid one patient getting oral candidiasis. There was no significant benefit shown for drugs not absorbed from the GI tract.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence, from randomised controlled trials, that drugs absorbed or partially absorbed from the GI tract prevent oral candidiasis in patients receiving treatment for cancer. There is also evidence that these drugs are significantly better at preventing oral candidiasis than drugs not absorbed from the GI.

A multicenter, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial of amoxicillin/clavulanate for the prophylaxis of fever and infection in neutropenic children with cancer

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the effectiveness of oral amoxicillin/clavulanate (25 mg/kg every 12 h) for prevention of fever and/or infection in neutropenic children with cancer.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, amoxicillin/clavulanate had a 12% benefit increase in terms of reduction in the incidence of febrile or infectious episodes, compared with placebo [44 of 83 (53%) vs.55 of 84 (65%); 95% confidence interval, -28% to +3%; P = 0.101]. This benefit was also associated with a 30% increase in the probability of failure-free survival at Day 15 (P = 0.138). A logistic regression analysis showed the effect of prophylaxis to be relevant, especially in patients with leukemia or lymphoma and in those not receiving hematopoietic growth factors, with 17 and 15% absolute benefit increases (logistic P = 0.014 and 0.034, respectively). Compliance with oral drugs was good, with very few and nonsevere drug-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a detectable clinical effect in the reduction of fever and infection in neutropenic children with cancer, especially those with acute leukemia and not receiving growth factors; the study was not powered to demonstrate a statistically significant effect in the overall patient population.

Infections following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Numerous advances have been made in the management of infection in HSCT recipients. With increasing knowledge the authors are able to prevent several serious infections from occurring, and reduce the severity of infections once they occur. Despite these advances, several previously unrecognized pathogens have emerged and pose risks to this population. Ongoing surveillance and reporting of atypical infections are warranted. Transplant and infectious disease clinicians alike must be vigilant to the shifts in infectious syndromes as a consequence of various prophylaxis and preemptive strategies, and be ready to modify empiric strategies to meet the changing microbiologic milieu. As we increase our understanding of the HSCT process, and use the immune system rather than relying on high-dose chemotherapy, the authors are likely to reduce toxicities and improve patient outcomes.

Quinolone resistance in neutropenic patients: the effect of prescribing policy in the UK and Pakistan

Quinolones are increasingly used as prophylaxis in neutropenic patients to prevent serious Gram-negative septicaemias but practice is not uniform because of the controversial evidence as to their effectiveness. It is unclear if they are of real benefit in patients with short episodes of neutropenia such as those resulting from treatment for solid tumours and lymphomas. The concern over the use of ciprofloxacin in such settings is the increasing development of quinolone resistant Gram-negative bacteria. We have retrospectively analysed our bacterial isolate resistance patterns in the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QE) and in the Haematology Department of the Aga Khan Hospital (AKU), Pakistan where all patients would receive ciprofloxacin prophylaxis when neutropenic. Seven out of 57 (12.2%) and 18 out of 55 (32.7%) Gram-negative organisms isolated from blood cultures at the QE and AKU Haematology Departments, respectively, were resistant to ciprofloxacin (P < 0.01). In the Birmingham community this was significantly lower (P < 0.01) (55 out of 6423: 0.85%). We also showed a higher level of E. coli resistance at the AKU (18 out of 31: 58%) where ciprofloxacin use was more widespread than at the QE (1 out of 11, P < 0.01). We conclude that ciprofloxacin should not be used indiscriminately.

Concepts in design of comparative clinical trials of antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients

Fundamental to the successful implementation of antifungal compounds in neutropenic patients is the appropriate design of comparative clinical trials investigating their safety and efficacy. The key elements of comparative clinical trial design include issues of enrollment, stratification, randomization, blinding, administration of study drugs, monitoring of drug toxicity, definitions, and key statistical elements of end points, sample size, and tools for data analysis. The initial selection of compounds and the timing of initiation of antifungal therapy in comparative clinical trials are predicated to a large degree on the in vitro and in vivo activities, plasma pharmacokinetics, profiles of safety and toxicity of the study drugs. Phase I and II studies have a critical role in designing comparative clinical trials of antifungal therapy by providing data on safety, tolerance, and plasma pharmacokinetics of the investigational agent. As new antifungal agents are developed in response to the challenge of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer, thoughtfully designed and carefully implemented clinical trials will be essential in determining the future utility of these promising compounds.

Reflections on gut decontamination in hematology

In Europe, but decontamination (GD) is largely used in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in departments of oncohematology treating neutropenic patients, in particular those patients subject to profound (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <100/mm3) and prolonged (>10 days) neutropenia, such as patients undergoing bone marrow allografting or induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Initially, treatment was in the form of non-absorbable antibiotics, but this has been partially superseded by quinolone-containing regimens, in particular in the centers participating in EORTC trials. In the last two EORTC trials comparing different regimens for the treatment of febrile neutropenia, 57-73% of the patients were receiving GD. A French epidemiologic study, performed prospectively and consecutively in 36 oncohematology centers, has recently shown that 45% of febrile neutropenic patients receive digestive decontamination (DD) at the onset of their first febrile episode. The value of GD has been the subject of much controversy. Numerous trials, some of which were controlled, were performed in neutropenic patients in the 1980s, prior to trials of GD in intensive care units, but did not lead to a consensus in the medical community of the value of GD. Moreover, GD is not, or is infrequently, used in the USA. Apart from trials involving the quinolones, very few studies have been published during the last 10 years. Despite this, policies have not changed greatly in the various centers. The CLIOH group has gathered the opinions of experts invited to a multidisciplinary meeting that took place in Paris in October 1996. The text that follows summarizes the reflections arising from this forum. It should be noted that this meeting was not designed to be a consensus conference, but rather to re-examine the correlation between the data in the literature and actual clinical practice and to highlight the main problems posed by DD in current oncohematology. The experts were separated into three working groups, each of which has drafted a report which appears in the text below.

A randomized controlled trial of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim plus norfloxacin versus sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim alone for the prophylaxis of bacteria infection during chemotherapy for lung cancer

The efficacy of the prophylactic administration of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (ST) plus norfloxacin (NFLX) versus ST alone to prevent the development of bacterial infection during chemotherapy-induced leukopenia was compared in patients with lung cancer. Patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy were randomized into one of the prophylactic regimens when grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred. Prophylactic treatment was performed on 133 courses of leukopenia in 75 patients and the efficacy was evaluated on 127 of those courses after excluding those patients who demonstrated a fever within 24 h from the start of the prophylaxis. The number of patients who had leukopenia associated fever was two out of 63 (3.2%) with the ST plus NFLX regimen and 10 out of 64 (15.6%) with ST alone; the difference was statistically significant. The prophylactic use of ST plus NFLX was thus found to be more useful than ST alone for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in patients with lung cancer.

Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora of cancer patients receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis

We studied 122 stool samples collected from 25 patients with hematologic malignancies who received prophylactic norfloxacin. Fecal samples were obtained at admission and twice weekly thereafter during prophylaxis. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli strains were isolated from the feces of 10 (40%) of the patients; two patients had fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains prior to beginning norfloxacin treatment, and in the other eight patients, the strains appeared subsequently. One patient developed fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli bacteremia after 10 days of norfloxacin administration.

Selective discharge of patients with acute myeloid leukemia during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

PURPOSE

It is common practice for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to be observed in hospital during the entire nadir after intensive chemotherapy. In an attempt to lessen the likelihood of developing infections with hospital acquired pathogens, we usually discharge patients upon completion of chemotherapy and follow them as outpatients. They are readmitted if fever develops. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of this practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 29 patients with AML (median age 40 years, range 16-63) who were treated with intensive remission-induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Afebrile patients not receiving antibiotics were discharged immediately following chemotherapy and were followed every 3-4 days at the day care unit. Patients were instructed to return immediately if fever rose to 38.2 degrees C or a fever of 38 degrees C persisted for 2 hr. The 29 patients received a total of 86 courses. Following 50 courses, patients were discharged. These 50 ambulatory nadir periods (ANPs) were monitored.

RESULTS

Median WBC and platelet counts on discharge were 2,900 per cubic millimeter (range 300-8,300) and 137,000 per cubic millimeter (range 17,000-618,000), respectively. Mean traveling time from the hospital by car was 1.6 hr (range 15 min-3 hr). In three of the 50 ANPs (6%), patients were not readmitted during their entire nadir. During 47 of the ANPs, patients returned to the hospital (because of fever in 44 cases), a mean of 7.2 days (range 1.0-12.7 days) after discharge. In 45 ANPs, patients were readmitted in good general condition. Four patients had life-threatening complications. Two patients were admitted in septic shock due to delay in seeking admission, but rapidly recovered. Two other patients died, one of cardiogenic shock within 24 hr of readmission and one 24 days later. Only one of the 11 gram negative bacteria cultured was resistant to mezlocillin and gentamicin. After 45 ANPs, patients were discharged a mean of 12.2 days (range 5-42 days) following readmission. We estimate that approximately 383 hospital days were saved by this policy, a mean of 7.6 days per patient, representing 16% of total inpatient hospital days.

CONCLUSIONS

For AML patients who are reliable and without complicating medical conditions, selected discharge following chemotherapy is a low-risk practice and may reduce the incidence of infection with resistant hospital-acquired pathogens.

Infection prevention strategies for children with cancer and AIDS: contrasting dilemmas

Infectious complications represent significant challenges for children with cancer and those infected with HIV. Although both have similarities in the disease- and treatment-related alterations in host defences, there are significant differences that can have an impact on the approach to treatment and prevention of the dominant infectious complications. An important difference is that children with cancer readily recover from neutropenia. Thus, the immune deficits are interspersed with intervals of immunological recovery. On the other hand, children with HIV infection do not appreciably recover from the progressive, immunological changes associated with the underlying HIV infection. The loss of cellular and humoral immunity is generally not reversible, and thus the risk of infection only increases over time. Bacteria constitute the predominant pathogen for paediatric cancer patients but invasive mycoses, viruses and parasitic infections are emerging as important pathogens. In paediatric cancer patients, strategies have been directed at altering or suppressing the endogenous colonization patterns of pathogenic bacteria. The success of this approach has been limited and at the expense of selecting for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Children with HIV infection are at risk of developing a wide spectrum of pathogens. Strategies for infection prevention in the HIV setting have been directed at specific organisms, generally using more specific antimicrobial agents and with greater success.

Bacteremia due to viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients: a review

Viridans streptococci have long been considered, with the exception of the ability to cause endocarditis, as minor pathogenic agents. More recently, however, these bacteria have become a major concern in neutropenic patients undergoing a chemotherapeutic treatment. In this high-risk population, they can be responsible for up to 39% of bacteremia cases and are the most frequent cause of this type of infection. The most frequently isolated species in blood cultures are Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus sanguis II. Viridans streptococcus bacteremia can be accompanied by serious complications, like adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (3% to 33%), shock (7% to 18%) or endocarditis (7% to 8%). Mortality rates range from 6% to 30%. Case-control studies have identified the following risk factors: severe neutropenia (< 100 neutrophils/mm3), prophylactic antibiotic treatments with quinolone or co-trimoxazole, absence of intravenous antibiotics at the time of bacteremia, high doses of cytosine arabinoside, oropharyngeal mucositis, and heavy colonization by viridans streptococci. The introduction of penicillin in prophylactic antibiotic treatments has reduced the incidence of these infections, but the long-term use of penicillin could be compromised by the emergence of resistant strains.

Use of selective decontamination in the prevention of infection after accidental irradiation. A review

Exposure to radiation induces a reduction in the number of gastrointestinal, anaerobic bacterial flora, and an increase in the number of Enterobacteriaceae that are associated with sepsis and mortality. Antimicrobials that suppress anaerobic flora have a deleterious effect on survival by promoting earlier enterobacterial sepsis. In contrast, in studies of animals and immunosuppressed patients, antimicrobials that inhibit gram-negative enteric bacteria and preserve the anaerobic flora have shown a beneficial effect by preventing bacterial translocation and fatal sepsis. The quinolone antimicrobials hold potential for therapy of endogenous and exogenous infection after irradiation.

Use of the quinolones for the prophylaxis and therapy of infections in immunocompromised hosts

The prevention and treatment of infections are major issues of supportive care in patients with haematological malignancies. Because of their broad antimicrobial activity, the use of fluoroquinolones for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients has been extensively studied. In comparison with placebo, norfloxacin reduces the incidence of Gram-negative infections, whereas Gram-positive bacterial and fungal infections remain unaffected. Ofloxacin and enoxacin also bacterial and fungal infections remain unaffected. Ofloxacin and enoxacin also produce a reduction in fever and documented infections. In randomized studies comparing ciprofloxacin with cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) plus colistin (each in combination with nonabsorbable antifungal agents), conflicting results were obtained. The incidence of documented Gram-negative bacterial infections was markedly reduced by ciprofloxacin prophylaxis; however, the number of Gram-positive infections may increase dramatically. Combining ciprofloxacin with a macrolide antibiotic in an attempt to prevent streptococcal infections can result in breakthrough bacteraemias due to resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Empirical antimicrobial therapy after quinolone prophylaxis should also be directed against microorganisms susceptible to quinolones, since sustained eradication by oral administration cannot be assumed with certainty. Clinical trials comparing intravenous quinolones in combination with aminoglycosides with widely used standard regimens for the treatment of infections in cancer patients indicate equivalent efficacy; however, in studies of ciprofloxacin alone, response rates were significantly lower compared with standard combinations. Therefore, quinolone monotherapy as empirical treatment in febrile neutropenic patients cannot be recommended.

Selective decontamination in neutropenic patients

It is well known that severe neutropenia, as usually seen in patients with acute leukaemia, aplastic anaemia or secondary to aggressive chemotherapy, predisposes to infections with Gram-negative enteric bacilli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and to fungal infections. Infection with anaerobes, in contrast, is rare in patients with haematologic malignancy [1]. The spectrum of bacterial pathogens in this patient population has recently broadened, and now includes coagulase-negative staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and, occasionally, coryneforms and other rather unusual opportunistic organisms. All these microorganisms originate either from the patient's own microflora, especially from the digestive tract, or from the hospital environment after having colonized the patient during the hospital stay [2]. Studies have shown that the incidence of fever during periods of severe neutropenia approaches 100%, and most of these fever episodes actually represent bacterial infection. For more than 20 years, methods for the prevention of bacterial and fungal infections have been under investigation in patients with profound neutropenia. These included decontamination trails, oral or systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis, strict reverse isolation and maintenance of germ-free conditions [3–8], prophylactic granulocyte transfusions [9], and, more recently, the application of haemopoietic growth factors [10, 11]. The method which remains the most widely used is oral antimicrobial prophylaxis, especially with agents for so-called selective decontamination of the intestinal tract.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

The antimicrobial combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is active in vitro against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Clinically, it is useful for prophylaxis and treatment of selected infections of the genitourinary, respiratory, and gastrointestinal tracts. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by itself or in combination with other antimicrobial agents is indicated for most Nocardia asteroides infections and is the antimicrobial agent of choice for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The drug is relatively nontoxic in patients who do not have the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and is available in both oral and intravenous forms. The native compounds and the metabolites of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole are excreted primarily in the urine. When the creatinine clearance is less than 30 ml/min, the dosage of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be adjusted.

Protecting neutropenic patients from bowel-derived organisms

Prevention of infection from bowel-derived organisms in neutropenic patients requires both the appropriate use of chemoprophylaxis and close attention to the prevention of cross-colonization or cross-infection with resistant Enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonads. Control of common-source infection and control of Gram-positive infection are also important. The objectives of chemoprophylaxis should be considered and their efficacy regularly assessed. Non-absorbable antibiotics may have an important place in minimizing selection of resistant strains, but absorbed agents such as cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) and 4-quinolones offer advantages over these and nalidixic acid as prophylactic agents. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is probably more effective at reducing Gram-negative bacteraemia than co-trimoxazole but overall mortality may be higher. Further confirmation and investigation of the reasons for this are needed. Protocols of rational antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment involving these agents can be modified to cover only the Gram-negative superinfections that are likely.

Ofloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prevention of infection in patients with acute leukemia and granulocytopenia

In a prospective randomized study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral ofloxacin (dosage: 200 mg three times daily) versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (dosage: 960 mg three times daily) as antibacterial prophylaxis in 128 patients with acute leukemia who received aggressive cytotoxic chemotherapy and were granulocytopenic for a median duration of 30 days. Fewer patients receiving ofloxacin were colonized by Enterobacteriaceae (13% versus 90%, p less than 0.001) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3% versus 14%, p = 0.025), and developed gram-negative bacterial infection (4% versus 26%, p = 0.002), whereas the incidence of gram-positive bacterial (19% versus 22%) and fungal (7% versus 14%) infections was similar in both groups. Ofloxacin was significantly better tolerated than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and shortened the duration of fever (p = 0.02) and of parenteral antimicrobial therapy for presumed or documented acquired infection (p = 0.01). Ofloxacin appears to be a safe, effective, well-tolerated alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for preventing gram-negative infection in acute leukemia, but more effective prophylaxis of gram-positive infections is still needed.

Streptococcus mitis sepsis in bone marrow transplant patients receiving oral antimicrobial prophylaxis

PURPOSE

Streptococcal infection has increasingly become a problem in neutropenic patients. We report on an outbreak of Streptococcus mitis sepsis in six bone marrow transplant patients receiving oral antimicrobial prophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an epidemiologic study of all patients in our bone marrow transplant program from 1986 to 1988. The hospital and microbiology records for all patients were reviewed. All bone marrow patients were treated according to specified protocols, including an oral prophylactic antimicrobial regimen that was changed in late 1987 from vancomycin/polymyxin/tobramycin to norfloxacin. Identification, susceptibility testing, and whole cell protein analysis of streptococcal isolates were performed at the Reference and Antimicrobial Investigations Laboratories at the Centers for Disease Control.

RESULTS

We detected six cases of S. mitis sepsis among 21 patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. No other concurrent pathogen was isolated from any patient at the time of the S. mitis bacteremia. Bacteremia developed within 72 hours of transplant in five of six patients and was associated with severe mucositis in four patients. An environmental study failed to reveal any common source for the outbreak, and whole cell protein analysis of all six S. mitis isolates revealed each to be distinct. Of 12 patients receiving oral vancomycin/polymyxin/tobramycin, one developed S. mitis bacteremia, versus five of nine patients receiving norfloxacin (p less than 0.03).

CONCLUSION

We believe S. mitis bacteremia is a potential complication of bone marrow transplantation and is associated with antimicrobial prophylaxis with norfloxacin, especially in the setting of mucositis.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of infection in renal transplantation: clinical efficacy, absorption of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, effects on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of long-term prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) for prevention of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, the absorption of TMP-SMZ in transplant patients, the effects of prophylaxis on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-two adult patients selected to undergo renal transplantation participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to receive TMP-SMZ experienced fewer hospital days with fever (3.3% versus 7.7%, p less than 0.001) and significantly fewer bacterial infections during the transplant hospitalization after removal of a urethral catheter (0.76 versus 1.88 per 100 days, p less than 0.005) and following discharge from the hospital (0.08 versus 0.30 per 100 days, p less than 0.001). During the transplant hospitalization, a daily dose of 320/1,600 mg was highly effective for prophylaxis whereas 160/800 mg daily gave unexpectedly low blood levels and was effective only for prevention of urinary tract infections after catheter removal. Prophylaxis was most effective in prevention of infections of the urinary tract (24 versus 54, p less than 0.005) and bloodstream (one versus nine, p less than 0.01) and infections caused by enteric gram-negative bacilli (four versus 46, p less than 0.001), enterococci (six versus 22, p = 0.006), or Staphylococcus aureus (one versus nine, p = 0.01). Prophylaxis did not prevent urinary tract infection associated with urethral catheters in the early posttransplant period, but after catheter removal, reduced the risk of urinary tract infection threefold (p less than 0.001). No significant differences in colonization by TMP-SMZ-resistant gram-negative bacilli were identified between the two groups; patients given TMP-SMZ were, paradoxically, less likely to become colonized by candida, probably because of less exposure to antibiotics for treatment of infection. Recipients of prophylaxis did not have a higher rate of infection caused by TMP-SMZ-resistant bacteria or Candida; however, their infections were more likely to be caused by resistant bacteria than infections in patients in the placebo group (62% versus 18%, p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with TMP-SMZ, which is well tolerated, significantly reduces the incidence of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, especially infection of the urinary tract and bloodstream, can provide protection against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and is cost-beneficial. Subnormal absorption of TMP-SMZ in the early posttransplant period mandates 320/1,600 mg daily for optimal benefit. Prophylaxis has little discernible effect on the microflora.

Streptococcal bacteremia in adult patients with leukemia undergoing aggressive chemotherapy. A review of 55 cases

We reviewed 55 cases of streptococcal bacteremia in adult patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy for treatment of acute leukemia. Viridans group streptococci were the most frequent species isolated (45 isolates). Hemolytic streptococci (four isolates), pneumococci (three isolates), and enterococci (three isolates) were infrequent. Clinical features of streptococcal bacteremia included fever, upper and lower respiratory infection, respiratory distress syndrome, soft tissue infection, and septic shock. Forty patients who had only streptococci, but no other organisms isolated from their blood, were compared with 36 cases of gram-negative bacillary bacteremia that occurred during the same study period within the same population at risk. The comparison showed that patients with streptococcal bacteremia had more often received high dose cytosine arabinoside as part of their chemotherapy (17 vs. five), had a longer mean duration of fever (11 vs. seven days, p less than 0.01) needed slightly more days of antibacterial therapy (15 vs. 12 days, p = 0.07, not significant), and were more likely to have been treated with newer quinolones for infection prevention (30 vs. eight). No differences between both groups were found for age, underlying disease, remission status, duration of severe granulocytopenia, and number of superinfections. The overall mortality was 18% in streptococcal bacteremia and 17% in gram-negative bacillary bacteremia. Streptococci, especially viridans group streptococci, should now be regarded as frequent causes of serious life-threatening infections following aggressive chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Hepatosplenic candidiasis in children with acute leukemia

Three children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia developed disseminated fungal disease predominantly involving the liver and spleen. The three patients were undergoing induction chemotherapy and had neutropenia when they presented prolonged fever not responsive to antibiotics. Once neutropenia was recovered, hepatosplenomegaly leukocytosis, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, and hypoechoic areas in the spleen and liver ultrasound were observed. All fungal blood cultures were negative, with the diagnosis being confirmed by histologic study. One of the patients died without achieving control of the candidiasis. The other two patients received prolonged antifungal treatment concurrently with chemotherapy and both are alive, one of them cured and in complete remission. The increasing frequency of this infection in recent years and the importance of a prompt and prolonged administration of antifungal therapy to obtain the cure are discussed.

Ofloxacin versus vancomycin/polymyxin for prevention of infections in granulocytopenic patients

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of oral ofloxacin were compared with those of vancomycin/polymyxin for prophylaxis of bacterial infections in granulocytopenic patients undergoing chemotherapy for hematologic malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial prophylaxis was begun at the time of initiation of chemotherapy. Thirty patients received ofloxacin tablets (300 mg orally every 12 hours) plus a nystatin suspension. Thirty-two patients received vancomycin capsules (500 mg orally every eight hours) and polymyxin capsules (100 mg orally every eight hours) plus a nystatin suspension.

RESULTS

In the group of patients receiving ofloxacin, there were a lower number of acquired gram-negative bacillary organisms per patient (0.13 versus 1.37, p less than 0.00005), fewer patients with documented infection (11 of 30 versus 21 of 32, p = 0.04), and fewer cases of gram-negative septicemia (zero of 30 versus five of 32, p = 0.05). Ofloxacin was also better tolerated (24 of 30 versus 10 of 32 patients highly compliant, p = 0.01) and associated with fewer gastrointestinal side effects (one of 30 versus nine of 32 patients with gastrointestinal side effects, p = 0.01) than vancomycin/polymyxin. However, except for a reduction of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection by ofloxacin, neither ofloxacin nor vancomycin/polymyxin was effective in eliminating colonization or infection with viridans group streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, or other gram-positive organisms. Only three isolates of ofloxacin-resistant gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, and Enterobacter aerogenes) were isolated from surveillance cultures, but none caused infection.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that oral ofloxacin is a more tolerable and efficacious alternative to vancomycin/polymyxin for prevention of serious gram-negative bacillary infections in granulocytopenic patients. More effective prophylaxis of gram-positive infections, however, is still needed.

Prevention of infection in acute leukemia

In a randomized study comparing cotrimoxazole plus colistin with ciprofloxacin, each in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics, the incidence of major infections in terms of septicemias and pneumonias as well as of minor infections and episodes of unexplained fever (FUO) was higher in patients treated with ciprofloxacin. In cases of microbiologically documented infections, gram-positive cocci dominated by far. In surveillance cultures of oral washings and of feces, gram-negative enterobacteria were only rarely detected; however, large numbers of cultures were positive for Acinetobacter species. There were four cases of documented Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients not receiving cotrimoxazole. The incidence of documented mycotic infections as well as the detection of fungi in surveillance cultures was similar in both treatment groups. A decrease in the number of adverse events, especially of allergic reactions, could not be achieved by the administration of ciprofloxacin. In conclusion, cotrimoxazole plus colistin in combination with nonabsorbable antimycotics remains the standard regimen for prevention of infection in patients with acute leukemia undergoing aggressive remission induction therapy. A detailed analysis of study II will be prepared for publication.

Prevention of bacterial and fungal infections in granulocytopenic patients

Granulocytopenic patients are at high risk for infections caused by gram-negative bacteria mostly originating from the gastro-intestinal tract. Several antimicrobial prophylactic regimens are used for prevention of bacterial infections. Prophylaxis with absorbable antimicrobial agents such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or new fluorinated quinolones seems to be superior to non-absorbable drugs such as polymyxin, vancomycin and gentamicin. The most promising results are obtained with new quinolones. Use of prophylaxis in neutropenic patients leads to changes in the spectrum of infections from gram-negative towards gram-positive.

Analysis of early infectious complications after autologous bone marrow transplantation

We reviewed the hospital course of 35 patients who underwent autologous bone marrow transplantation. Fever and profound neutropenia developed in all. Microbiologically confirmed infection developed in 22 patients, and unconfirmed but clinically evident infection developed in six. A bacterial infection developed in 21 patients (most commonly bacteremia without a detectable focus). Mucocutaneous fungal (12 patients) and viral (13 patients) infections were common, whereas invasive fungal (two patients) and viral (one patient) infections were uncommon. New pulmonary infiltrates developed in seven patients. Six deaths occurred during the initial hospitalization for transplantation, only one of which was directly attributable to infection. Stepwise logistic regression analysis retained male gender, total body irradiation, administration of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and development of mucositis or diarrhea as predictors of decreased survival, whereas higher pretreatment albumin levels and the administration of oral nonabsorbable antifungals were associated with an increased likelihood of survival. A comparison of these infectious complications with those found in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients shows similarities and differences with potentially important implications for patient management.

Infectious complications in childhood acute leukemias

Infectious complications in children with acute leukemias are reviewed as to incidence, predisposing factors, microbiologic etiologies and treatment. Principles of antimicrobiologic therapy are presented for bacterial, fungal, viral, and protozoal infections seen in children with cancer. Prevention of infection is also discussed.