Effects of concurrent sucralfate administration on pharmacokinetics of naproxen

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs

The safety profile of any pharmacological agent is defined on the basis of its toxicity, tolerability and potential for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions with other compounds, which may belong to the same or to a different pharmacological class. Drug-drug interactions are important in clinical practice because short and long term therapeutic regimens frequently require coadministration of different drugs. The pharmacological treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers (and of related syndromes) includes older and newer compounds, which have different mechanisms of action and exert different therapeutic effects. These compounds are widely prescribed in combination with other drugs being given for the treatment of concomitant diseases. This article reviews pharmacokinetic interactions with anti-ulcer drugs, paying particular attention to those which have clinically relevant adverse effects. Drugs mentioned in the literature as causing any pharmacokinetic interaction with anti-ulcer compounds are considered in this article.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen

Naproxen is a stereochemically pure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug of the 2-arylpropionic acid class. The absorption of naproxen is rapid and complete when given orally. Naproxen binds extensively, in a concentration-dependent manner, to plasma albumin. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of naproxen is linearly proportional to the dose for oral doses up to a total dose of 500 mg. At doses greater than 500 mg there is an increase in the unbound fraction of drug, leading to an increased renal clearance of total naproxen while unbound renal clearance remains unchanged. Substantial concentrations of the drug are attained in synovial fluid, which is a proposed site of action for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Relationships between the total and unbound plasma concentration, unbound synovial fluid concentration and therapeutic effect have been established. Naproxen is eliminated following biotransformation to glucuroconjugated and sulphate metabolites which are excreted in urine, with only a small amount of the drug being eliminated unchanged. The excretion of the 6-O-desmethylnaproxen metabolite conjugate may be tied to renal function, as accumulation occurs in end-stage renal disease but does not appear to be influenced by age. Hepatic disease and rheumatoid arthritis can also significantly alter the disposition kinetics of naproxen. Although naproxen is excreted into breast milk the amount of drug transferred comprises only a small fraction of the maternal exposure. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for probenecid, lithium and methotrexate.

Short-term sucralfate administration alters potassium diclofenac absorption in healthy male volunteers

AIMS

Since patients who regularly take NSAIDS may use sucralfate because of its cytoprotective properties, we examined the influence of this compound on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac.

METHODS

Potassium diclofenac (105 mg) was administered orally to eighteen healthy male volunteers with or without a 5-day pre-treatment with sucralfate (2000 mg twice daily). Blood samples were collected at intervals post-dose and serum concentrations of diclofenac were determined by reverse-phase h.p.l.c.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment with sucralfate significantly decreased both the AUC(0,8 h) [2265 ng h ml-1 (geometric mean) (range 1815-2827) vs 1821 ng h ml-1 (1295-2562)] and the Cmax [1135 ng ml-1 (geometric mean) (range 898-1436) 701 ng ml-1 (501-981)] with no significant delay in absorption [tmax 1.0 h (median) (range 0.5-2.0) vs 1.0 h (0.5-4.0)].

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term treatment of healthy male volunteers with sucralfate decreases potassium diclofenac bioavailability. These findings suggest that either an appropriate increase in the diclofenac intake or the use of another gastric mucosa protector must be adopted.

Effects of ranitidine and sucralfate on ketoconazole bioavailability

Ketoconazole is an oral imidazole antifungal agent useful in the treatment of opportunistic fungal infections. Gastrointestinal absorption of this agent is variable and dependent on the presence of gastric acid. This study compared the effects of concomitant sucralfate administration with ranitidine administration on the pharmacokinetic disposition of a 400-mg ketoconazole dose. Six healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive 400 mg of ketoconazole alone, 1.0 g of sucralfate concomitantly with a 400-mg ketoconazole dose, or ranitidine, administered 2 h prior to a 400-mg ketoconazole dose to titrate to a gastric pH of 6. All subjects received all three regimens in crossover fashion. Gastric pH was measured continuously for 4 h after ketoconazole administration in all subjects by using a Heidelberg radiotelemetry pH capsule. Relative ketoconazole bioavailability was compared between treatments. With sucralfate, five of six subjects demonstrated a decrease in the peak drug concentration in serum as well as an increase in the time to peak concentration, indicating a delay in ketoconazole absorption. The mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h for ketoconazole following gastric alkalinization was significantly different from that of either ketoconazole alone or ketoconazole with sucralfate (P less than 0.01). Continuous gastric pH monitoring allowed correlation between the decrease in ketoconazole bioavailability observed with ranitidine and the increase in gastric pH. The apparent decrease in ketoconazole bioavailability observed with sucralfate appears to be caused by an alternative mechanism since a change in gastric pH was not observed. On the basis of these findings, separating the administration of ketoconazole and sucralfate should be considered to decrease the potential for interaction of sucralfate on ketoconazole bioavailability.

Influence of sucralfate on trilisate bioavailability

Twelve healthy human volunteers were randomized to receive either choline-magnesium trisalicylate (CMT) 1.5 g orally every 12 hours or a combination of CMT plus sucralfate 1 g orally every 6 hours for 5 days before the blood sampling day. After a 3-week washout period, the subjects were crossed over to receive the alternate treatment for 5 days. The mean (+/- SD) area under the curve was 2668 (729) mg - hr/L and 2748 (716) mg - hr/L for CMT and CMT/sucralfate treatments, respectively. Mean (+/- SD) maximum concentration was 275 (69) mg/L and 283 (75) mg/L for CMT and CMT/sucralfate administrations, respectively. Mean (+/- SD) time to maximum concentration for CMT and CMT/sucralfate treatments was 1.8 (0.6) hours and 1.7 (0.7) hours, respectively. There were no significant differences detected for any parameter, therefore sucralfate does not affect rate or extent of CMT absorption.

Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states

Naproxen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) advocated for use in painful and inflammatory rheumatic and certain nonrheumatic conditions. It may be administered orally or rectally using a convenient once or twice daily regimen. Dosage adjustments are not usually required in the elderly or those with mild renal or hepatic impairment although it is probably prudent to start treatment at a low dosage and titrate upwards in such groups of patients. Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that the analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of naproxen is equivalent to that of the many newer and established NSAIDs with which it has been compared. The drug is effective in many rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and nonarticular rheumatism, in acute traumatic injury, and in the treatment of and prophylaxis against acute pain such as migraine, tension headache, postoperative pain, postpartum pain and pain associated with a variety of gynaecological procedures. Naproxen is also effective in treating the pain and associated symptoms of primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea, and decreases excessive blood loss in patients with menorrhagia. The adverse effect profile of naproxen is well established, particularly compared with that of many newer NSAIDs, and the drug is well tolerated. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of naproxen have been clearly established over many years of clinical use, and it can therefore be considered as a first-line treatment for rheumatic diseases and various pain states.

Effect of sucralfate and cimetidine on rheumatoid patients with active gastroduodenal lesions who are taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A pilot study

In a pilot study, 26 rheumatoid arthritic patients taking continuous, stable dosage regimens of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and with developed gastric and duodenal lesions were administered sucralfate 1 g four times per day (14 patients) or cimetidine 400 mg twice daily (12 patients) in a single-blind regimen for six weeks. Eleven of the patients given sucralfate and eight of the patients taking cimetidine had improved lesion scores. The lesion score of 10 of the 14 patients taking sucralfate and four of the 12 patients taking cimetidine improved by 50 percent or better (not significant). The antrum and body of the gastric mucosa and the mucosa of the duodenum synthesized prostanoids and thromboxane A2, and there was no significant difference in the synthesis of individual prostanoids at entry to the trial in the groups assigned to sucralfate or cimetidine. After six weeks of administration of sucralfate, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis by the antrum and body, but not the duodenum, was significantly greater than observed in the biopsy specimens at entry despite continuation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. After six weeks of cimetidine treatment, no change in PGE2 synthesis was noted in any biopsy specimens when compared with the synthesis at entry. No change in the synthesis of PGF2 alpha, 6-oxo-PGF1 alpha, or thromboxane B2 was noted in gastric or duodenal biopsy specimens in any treatment group. Sucralfate and cimetidine administration resulted in improved gastroduodenal lesion scores in rheumatoid arthritic patients continuing with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy.

Sucralfate for prevention of naproxen-induced mucosal lesions in the proximal and distal gastrointestinal tract

To study the protective effect of Sucralfate on Naproxen-induced mucosal lesions, 16 healthy, male volunteers were given Naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. together with Sucralfate 2 g b.i.d. or placebo in a double-blind, crossover study. Drug periods were 1 week, with a 3-week wash out in between. Mucosal lesions in stomach and duodenum were assessed by upper endoscopy before and after each drug period, using a visual analogue with separate scoring of mid- and distal duodenal lesions. 51Cr-EDTA absorption tests were performed to demonstrate possible changes in distal gut permeability. In addition, subjective symptoms were registered. Both drug periods induced significant lesions in the stomach and duodenum. Statistically speaking, fewer changes were found in the stomach and duodenal bulb after Sucralfate co-administration, whereas no significant reduction of lesions was seen in the distal duodenum. The 51Cr-EDTA absorption was increased in both periods, indicating deleterious effects to distal parts of the gut, but our results did not demonstrate Sucralfate-mediated protection from these changes. Symptoms were modest, and equal in the two periods. We conclude that Sucralfate may offer protection in the gastric and proximal duodenal mucosa, but no such protective effect was seen distally to the duodenal bulb.