Hemodialysis with low-molecular-weight heparin in high-risk hemorrhagic patients with acute renal failure

The approach to anticoagulation in patients treated with extracorporeal therapy in the intensive care unit

No wholly satisfactory drug or system has yet been devised for preventing thrombosis in extracorporeal blood circuits needed for renal replacement treatments. Heparin is still regarded by some as a standard approach, but advances in many areas of intensive care unit (ICU) medicine have created the potential for saving the lives of many patients in whom heparin anticoagulation is no longer appropriate. Several nonheparin methods are now readily performed, and the great risk of bleeding that is imposed by the use of heparin demands that citrate or other nonheparin methods be made available in the ICUs of all major medical centers that deal with trauma or major surgical procedures. Details of the practicalities, difficulties, and advantages are compared for low-dose heparin, regional heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, no-anticoagulant systems, citrate, and other anticoagulants for both intermittent and continuous modalities. The clinical features and complications in individual patients that impact on the selection of the best method of management are reviewed.

Beneficial effect of low molecular weight heparin on the hemodialysis model in dogs

The effect of FR-860, one of low molecular weight heparins, was investigated on the hemodialysis model in dogs for comparison with that of conventional unfractionated heparin (UF-heparin). In a bolus injection model, FR-860 at 12.5-100 U/kg prolonged the dialysis time (the time until the arterial circuit pressure reaching 500 mmHg) in a dose-dependent manner and UF-heparin at 50 U/kg also prolonged it. Additionally, FR-860 (12.5-50 U/kg/hr) and UF-heparin (25 and 50 U/kg/hr) continuously inhibited the rise of the arterial circuit pressure in an infusion model. In both models, the efficacy of FR-860 was more potent than that of UF-heparin. FR-860 and UF-heparin decreased the amount of blood loss remaining in the dialyzer in the infusion model. During hemodialysis, both FR-860 and UF-heparin showed activated plasma anti-F.Xa activity, prolongation of aPTT and such of thrombin time in a dose-dependent manner in those models. However, FR-860 was higher in anti-F.Xa activity and weaker in prolongation of aPTT and thrombin time than UF-heparin. These results suggest that FR-860 is more beneficial in in efficacy and higher in safety against the bleeding risk than UF-heparin hemodialysis.