Effects of antihypertensive therapy on blood pressure control, cognition, and reactivity. A placebo-controlled comparison of prazosin, propranolol, and hydrochlorothiazide

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in people without prior cerebrovascular disease for the prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006 (McGuinness 2006), and previously updated in 2009 (McGuinness 2009). Hypertension is a risk factor for dementia. Observational studies suggest antihypertensive treatment is associated with lower incidences of cognitive impairment and dementia. There is already clear evidence to support the treatment of hypertension after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether pharmacological treatment of hypertension can prevent cognitive impairment or dementia in people who have no history of cerebrovascular disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, as well as many trials registries and grey literature sources, most recently on 7 July 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which pharmacological interventions to treat hypertension were given for at least 12 months. We excluded trials of pharmacological interventions to lower blood pressure in non-hypertensive participants. We also excluded trials conducted solely in people with stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information regarding incidence of dementia, cognitive decline, change in blood pressure, adverse effects and quality of life. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 studies, totaling 30,412 participants, in this review. Eight studies compared active treatment with placebo. Of the four non-placebo-controlled studies, two compared intensive versus standard blood pressure reduction. The two final included studies compared different classes of antihypertensive drug. Study durations varied from one to five years. The combined result of four placebo-controlled trials that reported incident dementia indicated no evidence of a difference in the risk of dementia between the antihypertensive treatment group and the placebo group (236/7767 versus 259/7660, odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.09; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations and indirectness). The combined results from five placebo-controlled trials that reported change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) may indicate a modest benefit from antihypertensive treatment (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.29; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations, indirectness and imprecision). The certainty of evidence for both cognitive outcomes was downgraded on the basis of study limitations and indirectness. Study durations were too short, overall, to expect a significant difference in dementia rates between groups. Dementia and cognitive decline were secondary outcomes for most studies. Additional sources of bias include: the use of antihypertensive medication by the placebo group in the placebo-controlled trials; failure to reach recruitment targets; and early termination of studies on safety grounds. Meta-analysis of the placebo-controlled trials reporting results found a mean change in systolic blood pressure of -9.25 mmHg (95% CI -9.73, -8.78) between treatment (n = 8973) and placebo (n = 8820) groups, and a mean change in diastolic blood pressure of -2.47 mmHg (95% CI -2.70, -2.24) between treatment (n = 7700) and placebo (n = 7509) groups (both low certainty evidence downgraded on the basis of study limitations and inconsistency). Three trials - SHEP 1991, LOMIR MCT IL 1996 and MRC 1996 - reported more withdrawals due to adverse events in active treatment groups than placebo groups. Participants on active treatment in Syst Eur 1998 were less likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects, and participants on active treatment in HYVET 2008 reported fewer 'serious adverse events' than in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference in withdrawals rates between groups in SCOPE 2003, and results were unclear for Perez Stable 2000 and Zhang 2018. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five of the placebo-controlled trials provided quality of life (QOL) data. Heterogeneity again precluded meta-analysis. SHEP 1991, Syst Eur 1998 and HYVET 2008 reported no evidence of a difference in QOL measures between active treatment and placebo groups over time. The SCOPE 2003 sub-study (Degl'Innocenti 2004) showed a smaller drop in QOL measures in the active treatment compared to the placebo group. LOMIR MCT IL 1996 reported an improvement in a QOL measure at twelve months in one active treatment group and deterioration in another.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

High certainty randomised controlled trial evidence regarding the effect of hypertension treatment on dementia and cognitive decline does not yet exist. The studies included in this review provide low certainty evidence (downgraded primarily due to study limitations and indirectness) that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, leads to less cognitive decline compared to controls. This difference is below the level considered clinically significant. The studies included in this review also provide very low certainty evidence that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, prevents dementia.

An acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, eserine, induces long-term depression at CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus of adult rats

Studies in humans and rodents support a role for muscarinic ACh receptor (mAChR) and nicotinic AChR in learning and memory, and both regulate hippocampal synaptic plasticity using complex and often times opposing mechanisms. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are commonly prescribed to enhance cholinergic signaling in Alzheimer's disease in hopes of rescuing cognitive function, caused, in part, by degeneration of cholinergic innervation to the hippocampus and cortex. Unfortunately, therapeutic efficacy is moderate and inconsistent, perhaps due to unanticipated mechanisms. M1 mAChRs bidirectionally control synaptic strength at CA3-CA1 synapses; weak pharmacological activation using carbachol (CCh) facilitates potentiation, whereas strong agonism induces muscarinic long-term depression (mLTD) via an ERK-dependent mechanism. Here, we tested the prediction that accumulation of extracellular ACh via inhibition of AChE is sufficient to induce LTD at CA3-CA1 synapses in hippocampal slices from adult rats. Although AChE inhibition with eserine induces LTD, it unexpectedly does not share properties with mLTD induced by CCh, as reported previously. Eserine-LTD was prevented by the M3 mAChR-preferring antagonist 1,1-dimethyl-4-diphenylacetoxypiperidinium iodide (4-DAMP), and pharmacological inhibition of MEK was completely ineffective. Additionally, pharmacological inhibition of p38 MAPK prevents mLTD but has no effect on eserine-LTD. Finally, long-term expression of eserine-LTD is partially dependent on a decrease in presynaptic release probability, likely caused by tonic activation of mAChRs by the sustained increase in extracellular ACh. Thus these findings extend current literature by showing that pharmacological AChE inhibition causes a prolonged decrease in presynaptic glutamate release at CA3-CA1 synapses, in addition to inducing a likely postsynaptic form of LTD.

The combined propranolol/TSST paradigm--a new method for psychoneuroendocrinology

Upon perception of a stimulus as stressful, the human brain reacts with the activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), to mobilize energy resources to better cope with the stressor. Since the perception of the stressor is the initial stimulus, a synchronicity between the subjective perception of stress and the physiological stress reactivity should be expected. However, according to a recent meta-analysis, these associations are weak and inconsistent. The goal of the current study was to investigate the interaction between the SNS, HPA and subjective stress perceptions, by introducing an experimental manipulation of this interaction. For this purpose, we combined the SNS inhibitor propranolol with the Trier Social Stress Test, and measured endocrinological and psychological responses to the stressor. Thirty healthy male participants were recruited and randomly assigned to either a propranolol (PROP; n = 15) or placebo (PLC; n = 15) group. All subjects were administered 80 mg of propranolol 60 minutes prior to exposure to psychosocial stress. Salivary cortisol and alpha amylase (sAA), heart rate, blood pressure and subjective stress responses were assessed throughout the study. We observed significantly reduced sAA levels and heart rate increases in the PROP group in response to stress, with no effects of the drug on systolic or diastolic blood pressure changes. In line with previous studies, a significant increase in cortisol was seen in response to the stress exposure. Importantly, the cortisol increase was significantly higher in the PROP group. A typical increase in subjective stress could be seen in both groups, with no significant group differences emerging. Complementing previous work, this study further demonstrates a significant interaction between the HPA and the SNS during acute stress. The HPA activity was found to be elevated in the presence of a suppressed SNS in reactivity to the TSST.

Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias

BACKGROUND

Implicit negative attitudes towards other races are important in certain kinds of prejudicial social behaviour. Emotional mechanisms are thought to be involved in mediating implicit "outgroup" bias but there is little evidence concerning the underlying neurobiology. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of noradrenergic mechanisms in the generation of implicit racial attitudes.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers (n = 36) of white ethnic origin, received a single oral dose of the β-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (40 mg), in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, design. Participants completed an explicit measure of prejudice and the racial implicit association test (IAT), 1-2 h after propranolol administration.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo, propranolol significantly lowered heart rate and abolished implicit racial bias, without affecting the measure of explicit racial prejudice. Propranolol did not affect subjective mood.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that β-adrenoceptors play a role in the expression of implicit racial attitudes suggesting that noradrenaline-related emotional mechanisms may mediate negative racial bias. Our findings may also have practical importance given that propranolol is a widely used drug. However, further studies will be needed to examine whether a similar effect can be demonstrated in the course of clinical treatment.

Blood pressure lowering in patients without prior cerebrovascular disease for prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a previous review (McGuinness 2006).Hypertension and cognitive impairment are prevalent in older people. Hypertension is a direct risk factor for vascular dementia (VaD) and recent studies have suggested hypertension impacts upon prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore does treatment of hypertension prevent cognitive decline?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of blood pressure lowering treatments for the prevention of dementia and cognitive decline in patients with hypertension but no history of cerebrovascular disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS as well as many trials databases and grey literature sources were searched on 13 February 2008 using the terms: hypertens$ OR anti-hypertens$.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials in which pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions to lower blood pressure were given for at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. The following outcomes were assessed: incidence of dementia, cognitive change from baseline, blood pressure level, incidence and severity of side effects and quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials including 15,936 hypertensive subjects were identified. Average age was 75.4 years. Mean blood pressure at entry across the studies was 171/86 mmHg. The combined result of the four trials reporting incidence of dementia indicated no significant difference between treatment and placebo (236/7767 versus 259/7660, Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.74, 1.07) and there was considerable heterogeneity between the trials. The combined results from the three trials reporting change in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) did not indicate a benefit from treatment (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30, 0.53). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were reduced significantly in the three trials assessing this outcome (WMD = -10.22, 95% CI -10.78, -9.66 for systolic blood pressure, WMD = -4.28, 95% CI -4.58, -3.98 for diastolic blood pressure). Three trials reported adverse effects requiring discontinuation of treatment and the combined results indicated no significant difference (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.92, 1.11). When analysed separately, however, more patients on placebo in Syst Eur 1997 were likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects; the converse was true in SHEP 1991. Quality of life data could not be analysed in the four studies. Analysis of the included studies in this review was problematic as many of the control subjects received antihypertensive treatment because their blood pressures exceeded pre-set values. In most cases the study became a comparison between the study drug against a usual antihypertensive regimen.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no convincing evidence from the trials identified that blood pressure lowering in late-life prevents the development of dementia or cognitive impairment in hypertensive patients with no apparent prior cerebrovascular disease. There were significant problems identified with analysing the data, however, due to the number of patients lost to follow-up and the number of placebo patients who received active treatment. This introduced bias. More robust results may be obtained by conducting a meta-analysis using individual patient data.

Coactivation of M(1) muscarinic and alpha1 adrenergic receptors stimulates extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and induces long-term depression at CA3-CA1 synapses in rat hippocampus

Intact cholinergic innervation from the medial septum and noradrenergic innervation from the locus ceruleus are required for hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. However, much remains unclear about the precise roles of acetylcholine (ACh) and norepinephrine (NE) in hippocampal function, particularly in terms of how interactions between these two transmitter systems might play an important role in synaptic plasticity. Previously, we reported that activation of either muscarinic M(1) or adrenergic alpha1 receptors induces activity- and NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression (LTD) at CA3-CA1 synapses in acute hippocampal slices, referred to as muscarinic LTD (mLTD) and norepinephrine LTD (NE LTD), respectively. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that mLTD and NE LTD are independent forms of LTD, yet require activation of a common Galphaq-coupled signaling pathway for their induction, and investigated the net effect of coactivation of M(1) and alpha1 receptors on the magnitude of LTD induced. We find that neither mLTD nor NE LTD requires phospholipase C activation, but both plasticities are prevented by inhibiting the Src kinase family and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) activation. Interestingly, LTD can be induced when M(1) and alpha1 agonists are coapplied at concentrations too low to induce LTD when applied separately, via a summed increase in ERK activation. Thus, because ACh and NE levels in vivo covary, especially during periods of memory encoding and consolidation, cooperative signaling through M(1) and alpha1 receptors could function to induce long-term changes in synaptic function important for cognition.

Neuropsychiatric consequences of cardiovascular medications

The use of cardiovascular medications can have a variety of neuropsychiatric consequences. Many cardiovascular agents cause higher rates of fatigue and sedation than placebo, and case reports of medication-induced mood syndromes, psychosis, and cognitive disturbances exist for many cardiovascular drugs. Depression has been associated with β-blockers, methyldopa, and reserpine, but more recent syntheses of the data have suggested that these associations are much weaker than originally believed. Though low cholesterol levels have been associated with depression and suicide, lipid-lowering agents have not been associated with these adverse effects. Finally, cardiovascular medications may have beneficial neuropsychiatric consequences; for example, the use of clonidine in patients with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, the use of prazosin for patients with post-traumatic stress disorder, and the use of propranolol for performance anxiety and akathisia.

The effects of blood pressure reduction on cognitive function: a review of effects based on pooled data from clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To review systematically and synthesize quantitatively the evidence from completed randomized, controlled trials of blood pressure reduction on cognitive performance.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized, controlled trials that measured the effect of blood pressure reduction on cognitive performance. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies of retrieved articles and contacting experts in the field. Data were extracted on study quality, blood pressure, performance on cognitive function tests, antihypertensive treatment regimens and the duration of treatment. Studies were reviewed and abstracted independently by two trained researchers.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with 19 501 subjects were identified. Modest reductions in blood pressure (< 5/3 mmHg) in 13 860 subjects were associated with improvements in Mini Mental State Examination score [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.19-0.19] and performance on immediate (WMD = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.21-1.02) and delayed (WMD = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.23-1.11) logical memory tasks. However, studies in 2380 subjects that included tests of perceptual processing and learning capacity (trail making test-A, paired associated learning test) showed impaired performance (WMD = -1.12 s; 95% CI = -1.22 to -1.02 and WMD = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.04 to -0.04) on these tests.

CONCLUSION

Blood pressure lowering may have a heterogeneous effect on different aspects of cognitive function. Future studies with specific cognitive end-points are needed for greater clarity to guide practice.

The impact of medical illness on executive function

Executive function can be defined as one's ability to plan, initiate, sequence, monitor, and inhibit complex goal-directed behaviors. Although executive impairment is generally associated with dementia, recent studies have suggested that patients with chronic diseases, such as hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes, may also have executive deficits independent of psychiatric comorbidities. Because executive function is associated with functional outcomes, medication compliance, and the capacity to give informed consent, it is important that it be assessed. However, it is the authors' impression that executive function is not adequately assessed in medical settings, despite the availability of reliable measures. This article reviews the impact of medical illness on executive function and discusses practical diagnostic instruments and treatment strategies. The changes in functional status associated with executive impairment as well as pathophysiology and treatment strategies are also discussed.

Assessment of cognitive function in patients with essential hypertension treated with lercanidipine

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this longitudinal, open-label, comparative, multicenter study was to assess cognitive function in hypertensive patients receiving mid-term treatment with lercanidipine.

METHODS

Hypertensive patients aged 40 years or older were treated with lercanidipine (10 mg daily) after 7-10 days washout period. The duration of the study was 6 months. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 4 weeks (JNC 6th report). In patients with inadequate BP control, doxazosin was added and up-titrated. At baseline and after 6 months of treatment, cognitive function was evaluated using the Spanish validated version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Trail Making Test (TMT).

RESULTS

In the study population of 467 patients, BP decreased from 154.4/95.3 mmHg at baseline to 134.8/80.7 mmHg at 6 months. At the end of the study, 98% of patients were receiving lercanidipine, 20% an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and 6% doxazosin. Adequate BP control was obtained in 68% of patients. The mean (standard deviation) MMSE scores improved from 32.35 (2.59) to 33.25 (2.36) (p < 0.0001). Patients with good BP control scored significantly better than those with inadequate BP control (p < 0.05), which was already observed at the first month.

CONCLUSIONS

The third-generation calcium channel antagonist, lercanidipine, improved cognitive function after 6 months of treatment especially in patients with good BP control, suggesting that improvements in cognitive function may be associated with a decrease in BP.

Heart rate and blood pressure responses to mental stress and clinical cardiovascular events in men and women after coronary artery bypass grafting: the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (Post-CABG) biobehavioral study

BACKGROUND

The Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) biobehavioral study measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) responses to mental stress testing (MST) after surgery and prospectively observed the clinical events in patients who had undergone recent CABG surgery. To the extent that CABG surgery restores myocardial blood flow and prevents myocardial ischemia, patients who have recently recovered from CABG surgery may have nearly normal HR and BP responses to MST.

METHODS

A study population of 521 patients (351 men,170 women) from the cohort of 759 patients in the Post-CABG biobehavioral Study was monitored during a mirror tracing test (MTT) and a speech test task (STT) at the 6-month post-CABG surgery follow-up. Medical status for as long as 3 years after CABG surgery was ascertained from questionnaires and medical records.

RESULTS

The HR and BP responses during MTT and STT were similar to those reported in other studies of healthy individuals and patients without myocardial ischemia during MST. In contrast to results from other studies of patients with coronary artery disease, the quartile of Post-CABG biobehavioral study patients with the greatest responses in HR, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) during MST had half the rate of clinical events (10% in 3 years) as the quartile (20%) with the lowest changes in HR and BP (HR, P =.01; SBP, P =.07; DBP, P =.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Vigorous HR and BP responses to MST may be markers for a lower risk of incidence of clinical cardiovascular events among patients who have undergone recent CABG surgery.

Protective effect of anti-hypertensive treatment on cognitive function in essential hypertension: analysis of published clinical data

Hypertension is a risk factor for stroke and may also contribute to the development of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and vascular dementia (VaD). Cognitive complications of hypertension and the influence of anti-hypertensive treatment were underestimated until recently. In this paper, trials investigating the effect of anti-hypertensive treatment on cognitive function were evaluated. Analysis of these studies revealed that until approximately 1990-1995 investigations have assessed primarily if anti-hypertensive treatment impaired cognitive function. Only more recent studies have investigated positive effects on cognition of anti-hypertensive medication. Drugs more extensively evaluated were diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, sartanes and Ca(2+) channel blockers. Available studies have confirmed that elevated diastolic blood pressure or pulse pressure and isolated systolic hypertension play an important role in the development of cognitive impairment. Randomized placebo-controlled trials have provided evidence that reduction of hypertension safely and effectively decreases morbidity and mortality rates and cognitive complications of hypertension. Ca(2+) channel blockers and ACE inhibitors have been shown to be effective and probably better than diuretics and beta-blockers on cognitive domains of hypertension. More extensive investigations could contribute to establishing optimal choice and drug dosage for the treatment of cognitive complications of hypertension.

Chronic, severe hypertension does not impair spatial learning and memory in Sprague-Dawley rats

This study tested the hypothesis that long-term hypertension impairs spatial learning and memory in rats. In 6-wk-old Sprague-Dawley rats, chronic hypertension was induced by placing one of three sizes of stainless steel clips around the descending aorta (above the renal artery), resulting in a 20-80-mm Hg increase of arterial pressure in all arteries above the clip, that is, the upper trunk and head. Ten months later, the rats were tested for 5 d in a repeated-acquisition water maze task, and on the fifth day, they were tested in a probe trial; that is, there was no escape platform present. At the end of the testing period, the nonsurgical and sham control groups had similar final escape latencies (16 +/- 4 sec and 23 +/- 9 sec, respectively) that were not significantly different from those of the three hypertensive groups. Rats with mild hypertension (140-160 mm Hg) had a final escape latency of 25 +/- 6 sec, whereas severely hypertensive rats (170-199 mm Hg) had a final escape latency of 21 +/- 7 sec and extremely hypertensive rats (>200 Hg) had a final escape latency of 19 +/- 5 sec. All five groups also displayed a similar preference for the correct quadrant in the probe trial. Together, these data suggest that sustained, severe hypertension for over 10 mo is not sufficient to impair spatial learning and memory deficits in otherwise normal rats.

Autonomic dysfunction associated with locked-in syndrome in a child

This is a report of a young boy with the unusual combination of autonomic dysfunction with locked-in syndrome following multiple shunt revisions for hydrocephalus. A review of the literature on autonomic dysfunction syndrome and the complex clinical picture of the combined syndromes in a pediatric patient are discussed. The marked effectiveness of treatment with carbidopa/levodopa over bromocriptine for both syndromes is noted.

Neuropsychological consequences of antihypertensive medication use

A growing proportion of the general population is being prescribed antihypertensive medications for the long-term treatment of essential hypertension. Untreated hypertensive individuals exhibit some neuropsychological performance decrements, and numerous researchers have sought to determine whether drug therapy for hypertension worsens, improves, or leaves unaltered objectively measured cognitive skills. These issues may be especially important in the elderly, among whom both high blood pressure and compromised cognitive function are common. In this review, we collate the findings of more than 50 clinical studies according to class of antihypertensive medication studied and domains of neuropsychological performance assessed. Special attention is given to investigations of elderly subjects, and a critical summary is provided.

Effectiveness of doxazosin in systemic hypertension

Most alpha-receptor blocking drugs require divided daily administration because of a short plasma half-life. This multicenter study examined the effectiveness and safety of once-daily administration with doxazosin, a quinazoline analog alpha 1-receptor blocking drug with a plasma half-life of 19 hours. Patients with diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 90 to 115 mm Hg entered 4 weeks of single-blind placebo therapy and then were randomized to double-blind treatment with doxazosin (63 patients) or placebo (67 patients). After 10 weeks of titration, standing arterial BP was lowered by 14/11 mm Hg with doxazosin and by 0.5/0.9 mm Hg with placebo (p less than 0.001). Measured hourly for 12 hours after the dose, all standing and supine arterial BP values were significantly lower in the doxazosin group at each hour. Pulse rate increased slightly in both groups int he double-blind phase, but the increase with doxazosin never significantly exceeded that of placebo. Dizziness was the most common complaint with doxazosin, but syncope did not occur. Side effects were mild and transient and did not necessitate withdrawing any participants from the study. Body weight increased by 1.5 kg in the doxazosin group and decreased by 0.2 kg in the placebo group (p less than 0.01). Safe and effective in once-daily administration, doxazosin is suitable for initial therapy in mild and moderate hypertension.

Prazosin versus hydrochlorothiazide as initial antihypertensive therapy in black versus white patients

A randomized, drug-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide versus prazosin in controlling mild diastolic hypertension in black and white patients. Serum lipid and lipoprotein levels were also studied. Overall, 22 men and 14 women, of whom 50 percent were black, aged 21 to 69 years, were randomly assigned to treatment with either of these two agents. If diastolic blood pressure was not reduced below 90 mm Hg, the other agent was added. Results showed that hydrochlorothiazide and prazosin lowered blood pressure effectively in both black and white patients, but there was a trend for more patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide to need combination therapy than for those receiving prazosin, regardless of ethnic status. Prazosin therapy reduced total cholesterol levels by 20.5 mg/dl and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 19.0 mg/dl, and hydrochlorothiazide increased total cholesterol levels by 11.4 mg/dl and increased low-density lipoprotein levels by 9.3 mg/dl; but no differences in triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, plasma high-density lipoprotein2, or high-density lipoprotein3 levels were noted. Both agents were well tolerated in black and white patients. The combination of effective blood pressure control with no adverse effects on the serum lipid profile may make prazosin preferable to hydrochlorothiazide for treating mild diastolic hypertension in black as well as white patients.