Effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and ketoprofen in humans

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Drugs Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine

In this review, we evaluate the variability in the pharmacokinetics of 11 drugs with established prophylactic effects in migraine to facilitate 'personalized medicine' with these drugs. PubMed was searched for 'single-dose' and 'steady-state' pharmacokinetic studies of these 11 drugs. The maximum plasma concentration was reported in 248 single-dose and 115 steady-state pharmacokinetic studies, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was reported in 299 single-dose studies and 112 steady-state pharmacokinetic studies. For each study, the coefficient of variation was calculated for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and we divided the drug variability into two categories; high variability, coefficient of variation >40%, or low or moderate variability, coefficient of variation <40%. Based on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in steady-state studies, the following drugs have high pharmacokinetic variability: propranolol in 92% (33/36), metoprolol in 85% (33/39), and amitriptyline in 60% (3/5) of studies. The following drugs have low or moderate variability: atenolol in 100% (2/2), valproate in 100% (15/15), topiramate in 88% (7/8), and naproxen and candesartan in 100% (2/2) of studies. For drugs with low or moderate pharmacokinetic variability, treatment can start without initial titration of doses, whereas titration is used to possibly enhance tolerability of topiramate and amitriptyline. The very high pharmacokinetic variability of metoprolol and propranolol can result in very high plasma concentrations in a small minority of patients, and those drugs should therefore be titrated up from a low initial dose, depending mainly on the occurrence of adverse events.

Effects of food on pharmacokinetics of immediate release oral formulations of aspirin, dipyrone, paracetamol and NSAIDs - a systematic review

Aims

It is common to advise that analgesics, and especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), be taken with food to reduce unwanted gastrointestinal adverse effects. The efficacy of single dose analgesics depends on producing high, early, plasma concentrations; food may interfere with this. This review sought evidence from single dose pharmacokinetic studies on the extent and timing of peak plasma concentrations of analgesic drugs in the fed and fasting states.

Methods

A systematic review of comparisons of oral analgesics in fed and fasting states published to October 2014 reporting kinetic parameters of bioavailability, time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max), and its extent (C_max) was conducted. Delayed-release formulations were not included.

Results

Bioavailability was not different between fasted and fed states. Food typically delayed absorption for all drugs where the fasting t_max was less than 4 h. For the common analgesics (aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen, paracetamol) fed t_max was 1.30 to 2.80 times longer than fasted t_max. C_max was typically reduced, with greater reduction seen with more rapid absorption (fed C_max only 44–85% of the fasted C_max for aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen and paracetamol).

Conclusion

There is evidence that high, early plasma concentrations produces better early pain relief, better overall pain relief, longer lasting pain relief and lower rates of remedication. Taking analgesics with food may make them less effective, resulting in greater population exposure. It may be time to rethink research priorities and advice to professionals, patients and the public.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen enantiomers in wild type of Cyp 2c8 and Cyp 2c9 patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen (KTP) enantiomers has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following administration of a single oral dose of 100 mg rac-KTP during multidrug therapy taking into consideration the genotype of RA patients Concentrations of (−)-R and (+)-S enantiomers of KTP in plasma, urine and synovial fluid samples were determined using a validated HPCE method. The genotype of the patients was analyzed using PCR-RFLP method to determine the polymorphic variants of genes coding CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 isoenzymes. The levels of KTP enantiomers in synovial fluid at 4 h following administration were insignificantly greater [(−)-R = 1.34 ± 0.91 mg/L; (+)-S = 1.38 ± 0.91 mg/L] than in plasma [(−)-R = 1.15 ± 0.95 mg/L; (+)-S = 1.22 ± 0.95 mg/L]. The values of AUC_0−∞ were 11.89 ± 5.00 and 10.92 ± 4.10 mg h/L for (−)-R and (+)-S enantiomer, respectively, and were lower compared with data obtained in healthy volunteers following administration of the same dose of rac-KTP. But, no statistically significant differences were observed also for C_max, Cl, V_d, t_0.5 and MRT of KTP enantiomers. The total percentage of unchanged KTP eliminated with urine of RA patients was in the range of 30–50% of the administered dose. Though RA patients represented the same wild genotype, quite significant variabilities (Cl_(−)-R = 2.37–13.50 L/h and Cl_(+)-S = 2.44–9.90 L/h) existed in the pharmacokinetics parameters of KTP. We concluded that KTP data obtained from healthy volunteers cannot be sufficient to predict disposition of KTP enantiomers in RA patients, especially when undergoing long-term multidrug therapy.

Evaluation of bioequivalence after oral, intramuscular, and intravenous administration of racemic ketoprofen in pigs

OBJECTIVE

To assess bioequivalence after oral, IM, and IV administration of racemic ketoprofen in pigs and to investigate the bioavailability after oral and IM administration.

ANIMALS

8 crossbred pigs.

PROCEDURES

Each pig received 4 treatments in a randomized crossover design, with a 6-day washout period. Ketoprofen was administered at 3 and 6 mg/kg, PO; 3 mg/kg, IM; and 3 mg/kg, IV. Plasma ketoprofen concentrations were measured by use of high-performance liquid chromatography for up to 48 hours. To assess bioequivalence, a 90% confidence interval was calculated for the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)).

RESULTS

Equivalence was not detected in the AUCs among the various routes of administration nor in C(max) between oral and IM administration of 3 mg/kg. The bioavailability of ketoprofen was almost complete after each oral or IM administration. Mean +/- SD C(max) was 5.09 +/- 1.41 microg/mL and 7.62 +/- 1.22 microg/mL after oral and IM doses of 3 mg/kg, respectively. Mean elimination half-life varied from 3.52 +/- 0.90 hours after oral administration of 3 mg/kg to 2.66 +/- 0.50 hours after IV administration. Time to peak C(max) after administration of all treatments was approximately 1 hour. Increases in AUC and C(max) were proportional when the orally administered dose was increased from 3 to 6 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Orally administered ketoprofen was absorbed well in pigs, although bioequivalence with IM administration of ketoprofen was not detected. Orally administered ketoprofen may have potential for use in treating pigs.

Absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between orally co-administered naproxen sodium and diphenhydramine hydrochloride

The potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between naproxen and diphenhydramine was examined in a randomized three-way crossover design with a 1-week washout between dosing. Single oral doses of 220 mg of naproxen sodium and 50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride were given separately and together to 30 healthy male and female subjects. Heparinized blood samples obtained for 48 h postdose were assayed for plasma naproxen and diphenhydramine concentrations using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) assay methods, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)), time of C(max) (T(max)) and terminal exponential half-life (t(1/2,z)), were analysed for significant treatment differences by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Based on absence of significant treatment effects on AUC and C(max), single-dose oral co-administration of 220 mg of naproxen sodium with 50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride does not alter the pharmacokinetics of either naproxen or diphenhydramine. Significant treatment differences seen for naproxen T(max) (0.3 h, males only) and diphenhydramine t(1/2,z) (0.8 h, females only) were minor and are unlikely to have therapeutic consequences. Thus, efficacy and safety of concomitant naproxen and diphenhydramine should not be altered due to a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Short-term sucralfate administration alters potassium diclofenac absorption in healthy male volunteers

AIMS

Since patients who regularly take NSAIDS may use sucralfate because of its cytoprotective properties, we examined the influence of this compound on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac.

METHODS

Potassium diclofenac (105 mg) was administered orally to eighteen healthy male volunteers with or without a 5-day pre-treatment with sucralfate (2000 mg twice daily). Blood samples were collected at intervals post-dose and serum concentrations of diclofenac were determined by reverse-phase h.p.l.c.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment with sucralfate significantly decreased both the AUC(0,8 h) [2265 ng h ml-1 (geometric mean) (range 1815-2827) vs 1821 ng h ml-1 (1295-2562)] and the Cmax [1135 ng ml-1 (geometric mean) (range 898-1436) 701 ng ml-1 (501-981)] with no significant delay in absorption [tmax 1.0 h (median) (range 0.5-2.0) vs 1.0 h (0.5-4.0)].

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term treatment of healthy male volunteers with sucralfate decreases potassium diclofenac bioavailability. These findings suggest that either an appropriate increase in the diclofenac intake or the use of another gastric mucosa protector must be adopted.