Bronchial effects of alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists and of other antihypertensive agents in asthma

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive treatment for acute asthma

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of using dexmedetomidine with salbutamol and salbutamol nebulization alone in patients with acute exacerbation of asthma presenting to the emergency department.

Methods

This clinical trial included 60 patients, in the age range of 18 to 55 years, with signs of bronchospasm presenting to the emergency department. In the intervention group, dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg was injected intravenously and three doses of salbutamol nebulization were administered over 60 minutes. In the control group, salbutamol nebulization was administered for 60 minutes three times. The patient’s clinical status, based on clinical symptoms, consciousness, speech, breathing rate, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded before the intervention, and peak expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were measured at 20, 40, and 60 minutes after intervention. Patients who did not respond to the intervention were excluded from the study within 60 minutes.

Results

The increased mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second and mean peak expiratory flow rate were found to be similar in both groups during the treatment (P=0.304). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded at 40 and 60 minutes were significantly lower in the intervention group. During this study, no patient was excluded before 60 minutes.

Conclusion

Administration of dexmedetomidine in addition to standard salbutamol treatment has no beneficial effect in patients with acute asthma attacks and merely causes hypotension in patients.

Moxonidine inhibits excitatory inputs to airway vagal preganglionic neurons via activation of both α2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline I1 receptors

As an imidazoline I1 receptor agonist with very weak binding affinity for α₂-adrenoceptors, moxonidine is commonly used in the treatment of hypertension. Moxonidine also has been implicated to act centrally to reduce airway vagal outflow. However, it is unknown at which central sites moxonidine acts to affect airway vagal activity, and how moxonidine takes effect at synaptic and receptor levels. In this study, airway vagal preganglionic neurons (AVPNs) were retrogradely labeled in neonatal rats from the intrathoracic trachea; retrogradely labeled AVPNs in the external formation of the nucleus ambiguus (NA) were identified in rhythmically active medullary slices using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques; and the effects of moxonidine on the spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) of AVPNs were observed at synaptic level. The results show that moxonidine (10 μmol·L^-1) significantly inhibited the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs in both inspiratory-activated and inspiratory-inhibited AVPNs. This effect was partially blocked by SKF-86466 (10 μmol·L^-1), a highly selective antagonist of α₂-adrenoceptors, or AGN-192403, a selective antagonist of imidazoline I1 receptors, and was completely blocked by efaroxan (10 μmol·L^-1), an antagonist of both α₂-adrenoceptors and imidazoline I1 receptors. These results demonstrate that moxonidine inhibits the excitatory inputs to AVPNs via activation of both α₂-adrenoceptors and imidazoline I1 receptors, and suggest that physiologically both of these two types of receptors are involved in the central regulation of airway vagal activity at preganglionic level. Moxonidine might be potentially useful in diseases with aberrant airway vagal activity such as asthma and chronic obstructive diseases.

[Dexmedetomidine and clonidine: a review of their pharmacodynamy to define their role for sedation in intensive care patients]

Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists ("alpha-2 agonists") present multiple pharmacodynamic effects: rousable sedation, decreased incidence of delirium in the setting of critical care, preservation of respiratory drive, decreased whole body oxygen consumption, decreased systemic and pulmonary arterial impedance, improved left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, preserved vascular reactivity to exogenous catecholamines, preserved vasomotor baroreflex with lowered set point, preserved kidney function, decreased protein catabolism. These pharmacodynamic effects explain the interest for these drugs in the critical care setting. However, their exact role for sedation in critically ill-patients remains open for further studies. Given the few double-blind randomized multicentric trials available, the present non exhaustive analysis of the literature aims at presenting the utilization of alpha-2 agonists as potential first-line sedative agents, in the critical care setting. Suggestions regarding the use of alpha-2 agonists as sedatives are detailed.

The pharmacologic treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction

Because many antihypertensive drugs can affect airway function, the treatment of hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction is complex. For example, the worsening or precipitation of asthma by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists is well-recognized, but beta(1)-adrenoceptor blockers that exert mild beta(2)-agonist effects, and those that modulate the endogenous production of nitric oxide, affect airway function to a lesser extent. Therapy with selective alpha(1)-blockers is not contraindicated in cases of chronic airway obstruction. Conversely, alpha(2)-agonists must not be given to asthmatic subjects because they can adversely affect the bronchi. Calcium channel blockers do not exert severe side effects on the airways. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may cause cough and exacerbate or even induce asthma; however, angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) antagonists do not cause cough. 5-Hydroxytryptamine modifiers such as urapidil are a treatment option for patients with chronic airway obstruction. In patients with airway dysfunction, we suggest treatment with thiazide diuretics as the initial drug choice, and calcium channel blockers if the response is poor. In the case of no response, calcium channel blockers alone must be used. However, there is no strict rule because individual patients may respond differently to individual drugs and drug combinations. Consequently, it is important to adopt a flexible approach. For patients who are unresponsive to the aforementioned drugs, AT(1) receptor antagonists, newer beta(1)-adrenoceptor-blocking agents with ancillary properties (eg, celiprolol or nebivolol), and/or vasodilators can be considered.

I1 imidazoline agonists. General clinical pharmacology of imidazoline receptors: implications for the treatment of the elderly

In recent years evidence has accumulated for the existence of central imidazoline (I1) receptors that influence blood pressure. While there is some controversy, it has been suggested that clonidine exerts its blood pressure-lowering effect mainly by activation of imidazoline I1 receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, while its sedative effect is mediated by activation of central alpha2-receptors. Moxonidine and rilmenidine are 2 imidazoline compounds with 30-fold greater specificity for I1 receptors than for alpha2-receptors. In comparison, clonidine displays a 4-fold specificity for I1 receptors compared with alpha2 receptors. Moxonidine and rilmenidine lower blood pressure by reducing peripheral resistance. They reduce circulating catecholamine levels and moxonidine reportedly reduces sympathetic nerve activity in patients with hypertension. Moxonidine and rilmenidine modestly reduce elevated blood glucose levels and moxonidine has been reported to reduce insulin resistance in hypertensive patients with raised insulin resistance. Small reductions in plasma levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides have been reported with rilmenidine. Both moxonidine and rilmenidine are well absorbed after oral administration and are eliminated unchanged by the kidneys. The elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of rilmenidine and moxonidine is 8 and 2 hours, respectively, but trough/peak plasma concentration ratios indicate that moxonidine can be administered once daily, suggesting possible CNS retention. As would be expected, t(1/2) values are increased in patients with reduced renal function, and in elderly individuals. Both drugs have been compared with established antihypertensive drugs from all the major groups. Studies, almost all of which were of a double-blind, parallel-group design, indicate that blood pressure control with moxonidine or rilmenidine is similar to that with established drugs, i.e. alpha-blocking drugs, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, beta-blocking drugs and diuretic agents. There have been few studies conducted solely in elderly patients. However, evidence clearly suggests that the antihypertensive effect of the imidazoline compounds is not reduced in elderly patients. The overall adverse effect profile of moxonidine and rilmenidine compares reasonably with established agents. In accord with the receptor-binding studies, drowsiness and dry mouth are observed less often with these drugs than with other centrally acting drugs, although the symptoms occur more often than with placebo. An overshoot of blood pressure was seen when treatment with clonidine, but not moxonidine, was abruptly discontinued in conscious, spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clinical evidence of withdrawal reaction with moxonidine or rilmenidine is scant but caution should be observed pending more formal studies.

Effects of three alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists, rilmenidine, UK 14304 and clonidine on bradykinin- and substance P-induced airway microvascular leakage in guinea-pigs

The effects of three alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists, clonidine, rilmenidine and UK 14304 on the increase of microvascular permeability induced by bradykinin or substance P in guinea-pigs airways have been studied in vivo. Extravasation of intravenously (i.v.) injected Evans blue dye was used as index of permeability. The effects of the three alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists on the contraction induced by bradykinin (0.3 micrograms.kg-1, i.v.) and substance P (0.3 micrograms.kg-1, i.v.) were also studied on the isolated guinea-pig trachea. The increase of plasma exudation induced by bradykinin (0.3 micrograms.kg-1, i.v.) was inhibited partially by rilmenidine and UK 14304 (20 micrograms and 100 micrograms, intratracheally) respectively. These two substances had no action on the effects of substance P. The effects of rilmenidine and UK 14304 were abolished by alpha 2-blockers (idazoxan 1mg.kg-1 i.v. and RX 821001 100 micrograms.kg-1, i.v.), but they were not altered by the alpha 1-blocker prazosin (30 micrograms.kg-1, i.v.). Under similar conditions, clonidine or the alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine were without significant effects. In vitro, rilmenidine and UK 14304 inhibited partially the contractile effects of bradykinin but not those of substance P. To conclude, both rilmenidine and UK 14304 inhibit the bradykinin-induced increase of vascular permeability in the airways, and they probably do so on peptidergic nerve endings at the prejunctional level since these substances are without effect on substance P. The absence of activity of clonidine in our study might be due to a difference in spectrum of action on the several types of alpha 2-adrenergic or imidazole receptors.