Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease

High-resolution Manometry can Characterize Esophagogastric Junction Morphology and Predict Esophageal Reflux Burden

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows characterization of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology and identification of hiatus hernia using novel software tools.

AIM

The main purpose of this study was to determine the impact of HRM-based EGJ and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) metrics in predicting abnormal reflux burden.

METHODS

Total, upright, and supine acid exposure times (AETs) were extracted from ambulatory reflux monitoring performed off therapy in 482 patients (54.2±0.6 y, 63.3% female patients). EGJ morphology was categorized into type 1 (superimposed LES and crural diaphragm), type 2 (<3 cm separation between LES and crural diaphragm), and type 3 (≥3 cm separation). EGJ-contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and distal contractile integral (DCI) were extracted. Conventional EGJ and LES metrics, including basal and end-expiratory LES pressure, and LES length were also analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the value of HRM parameters in predicting abnormal esophageal reflux burden.

RESULTS

Type 1 EGJ was noted in 298 (61.8%), type 2 in 125 (25.9%), and type 3 in 59 (12.2%); EGJ-CI and mean DCI were lower with abnormal EGJ morphology. Mean AET, and proportions with abnormal AET increased as EGJ morphology became progressively disrupted (P<0.0001 across groups); low EGJ-CI was additive in predicting abnormal AET. All HRM parameters assessed (EGJ morphology, EGJ-CI, and DCI) were independent predictors for abnormal AET (P≤0.02). Conventional LES and EGJ metrics were also associated with abnormal reflux burden, but intra-abdominal LES length, and hiatus hernia size did not independently predict total AET.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM-based EGJ morphology and EGJ barrier assessment independently predict esophageal reflux burden.

Imaging of Asthma

Asthma is one of the most common diseases of the lung. Asthma manifests with common, although often subjective and nonspecific, imaging features at radiography and high-resolution computed tomography. The primary role of imaging is not to make a diagnosis of asthma but to identify complications, such as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, or mimics of asthma, such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis. This article reviews the imaging features of asthma as well as common complications and mimics.

Liquid-containing Refluxes and Acid Refluxes May Be Less Frequent in the Japanese Population Than in Other Populations: Normal Values of 24- hour Esophageal Impedance and pH Monitoring

Background/Aims

Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring allows detection of all types of reflux episodes and is considered the best technique for identifying gastroesophageal refluxes. However, normative data for the Japanese population are lacking. This multicenter study aimed to establish the normal range of 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH data both in the distal and the proximal esophagus in Japanese subjects.

Methods

Forty-two healthy volunteers (25 men and 17 women) with a mean ± standard deviation age of 33.3 ± 12.4 years (range: 22–72 years) underwent a combined 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring. According to the physical and pH properties, distal or proximal esophageal reflux events were categorized.

Results

Median 45 reflux events occurred in 24 hours, and the 95th percentile was 85 events. Unlike previous reports, liquid-containing reflux events are median 25/24 hours with the 95th percentile of 62/24 hours. Acidic reflux events were median 11/24 hours with the 95th percentile of 39/24 hours. Non-acidic gas reflux events were median 15/24 hours with the 95th percentile of 39/24 hours. Proximal reflux events accounted for 80% of the total reflux events and were mainly non-acidic gas refluxes. About 19% of liquid and mixed refluxes reached the proximal esophagus.

Conclusions

Unlike previous studies, liquid-containing and acidic reflux events may be less frequent in the Japanese population. Non-acidic gas reflux events may be frequent and a cause of frequent proximal reflux events. This study provides important normative data for 24-hour impedance and pH monitoring in both the distal and the proximal esophagus in the Japanese population.

Role of saliva in esophageal defense: implications in patients with nonerosive reflux disease

Background:

It has been previously demonstrated that patients with reflux esophagitis exhibit a significant impairment in the secretion of salivary protective components versus controls. However, the secretion of salivary protective factors in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is not explored. The authors therefore studied the secretion of salivary volume, pH, bicarbonate, nonbicarbonate glycoconjugate, protein, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) and prostaglandin E2 in patients with NERD and compared with the corresponding values in controls (CTRL).

Methods:

Salivary secretion was collected during basal condition, mastication and intraesophageal mechanical (tubing, balloon) and chemical (initial saline, acid, acid/pepsin, final saline) stimulations, respectively, mimicking the natural gastroesophageal reflux.

Results:

Salivary volume, protein and TGF-α outputs in patients with NERD were significantly higher than CTRL during intraesophageal mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulations (P < 0.05). Salivary bicarbonate was significantly higher in NERD than CTRL group during intraesophageal stimulation with both acid/pepsin (P < 0.05) and saline (P < 0.01). Salivary glycoconjugate secretion was significantly higher in the NERD group than the CTRL group during chewing (P < 0.05), mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulation (P < 0.01). Salivary EGF secretion was higher in patients with NERD during mechanical stimulation (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Patients with NERD demonstrated a significantly stronger salivary secretory response in terms of volume, bicarbonate, glycoconjugate, protein, EGF and TGF-α than asymptomatic controls. This enhanced salivary esophagoprotection is potentially mediating resistance to the development of endoscopic mucosal changes by gastroesophageal reflux.

Refractory GERD: increased body mass index is associated with persisting acid exposure but not hypersensitive esophagus or functional heartburn

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of persistent abnormal acid exposure, hypersensitive esophagus (HE), and functional heartburn (FH) in obese/overweight and normal-weight patients referred for impedance-pH monitoring, because of persisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms despite therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). ΜETHODS: Patients with normal endoscopy and typical GERD symptoms, despite PPI therapy twice daily, underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring while on therapy. Distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH<4) was measured and reflux episodes were classified into acid or nonacid. A positive symptom index was defined when at least 50% of symptom events were preceded by reflux episodes. Patients were categorized as those with persistent abnormal acid exposure, those with HE, and those with FH. The incidence of persistent abnormal acid exposure, HE, and FH between overweight/obese patients (BMI≥25 kg/m) and normal-weight patients (BMI<25 kg/m) was subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients (women: 158, men: 88, increased BMI: 151, normal BMI: 95, mean age 55, range 18-75 years) were included. Persistent abnormal acid exposure was found in 39 patients (increased BMI: 31, normal BMI: 8), HE in 77 patients (increased BMI: 43, normal BMI: 34), and FH in 118 patients (increased BMI: 69, normal BMI: 49). When comparing BMI among all three groups, patients with increased BMI were more likely to have acid reflux than HE or FH (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

In patients with GERD symptoms refractory to double-dose PPI therapy, those with increased BMI are more likely to have persistent abnormal acid exposure than HE or FH.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of hypersensitive esophagus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring can be used to assess the relationship of persistent symptoms and reflux episodes, despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Using this technique, we aimed to identify patients with hypersensitive esophagus and evaluate the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on their symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with normal endoscopy and typical reflux symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, and regurgitation), despite PPI therapy twice daily, underwent 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH <4) was measured and reflux episodes were classified into acid or non-acid. A positive symptom index (SI) was declared if at least half of the symptom events were preceded by reflux episodes. Patients with a normal distal esophageal acid exposure time, but with a positive SI were classified as having hypersensitive esophagus and were randomized to receive citalopram 20 mg or placebo once daily for 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients (150 females (59.5%); mean age 55 (range 18-75) years) underwent 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Two hundred and nineteen patients (86.9%) recorded symptoms during the study day, while 105 (47.9%) of those had a positive SI (22 (20.95%) with acid, 5 (4.76%) with both acid and non-acid, and 78 (74.29%) with non-acid reflux). Among those 105 patients, 75 (71.4%) had normal distal esophageal acid exposure time and were randomized to receive citalopram 20 mg (group A, n=39) or placebo (group B, n=36). At the end of the follow-up period, 15 out of the 39 patients of group A (38.5%) and 24 out of the 36 patients of group B (66.7%) continue to report reflux symptoms (P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with SSRIs is effective in a select group of patients with hypersensitive esophagus.

Selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of hypersensitive esophagus

In patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) resistant reflux symptoms, ambulatory 24 h pH impedance monitoring can be used to assess whether a relationship exists between symptoms and reflux episodes. Using this technique it has been suggested that patients with typical reflux symptoms and a normal upper endoscopy should be subclassified as follows: normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure (patients with acid reflux); normal endoscopy, with normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a positive symptom association for either acid or nonacid reflux (patients with hypersensitive esophagus); and normal endoscopy, normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a negative symptom association for acid and nonacid reflux (patients with functional heartburn). Although for patients with a normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure more aggressive acid suppression can be recommended, managing patients with hypersensitive esophagus and functional heartburn remains a real challenge.Therefore, investigators have evaluated the role of tricyclic antidepressants or selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in influencing esophageal perception. Imipramine has been shown to decrease pain perception in healthy male volunteers and improve symptoms of patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Trazodone improved symptoms in patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities, while administration of SSRIs lowered chemical and mechanical sensitivity and benefited patients with diffuse esophageal spasm. Furthermore, in a recent study conducted by our group, citalopram administered once daily for 6 months was effective in a select group of patients with hypersensitive esophagus, suggesting that there is a role for SSRIs in the treatment of this disorder.

Determination of pH turning point with pH mapping of the gastroesophageal junction: an alternative technique to orientate esophageal pH monitoring

Manometric location of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has been mandatory before esophageal pH monitoring, despite costs and discomfort related with esophageal manometry. The aims of the study were: (i) to map the pH of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) to determine a pH turning point (PTP) and its relation with LES; and (ii) to test the feasibility of this technique to orientate esophageal pH monitoring. We studied 310 adult patients who underwent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring off acid-suppressive therapy. GEJ pH mapping was carried out by step-pulling the pH sensor from 5 cm below to 5 cm above LES, and a PTP was determined when pH changed from below to above 4, in centimeters from the nostril. Thirty-six patients referred only for pH monitoring were studied with pH sensor placed at 5 cm above the PTP. Out of 310 patients, a PTP was found in 293 (94.5%): inside LES in 86.3%, into the stomach in 8.2% and in the esophageal body in 5.5% of patients. The median distance between PTP and place where pH sensor monitored reflux was 8 cm. Among 36 patients who performed pH monitoring without LES manometry, there was no gastric monitoring during reflux testing. In adult patients investigated off acid suppressive therapy, GEJ pH mapping with reflux monitoring 5 cm above the PTP can be an alternative technique to perform esophageal pH monitoring when LES manometry is not available. Additional studies are needed before the widespread use of GEJ pH mapping in the clinical practice.

Update on esophagitis: controversial and underdiagnosed causes

CONTEXT

Esophagitis is a common cause of symptoms for which patients seek the advice of a physician. Esophagitis of differing etiologies often demonstrate overlapping histopathologic features, making their distinction difficult. This is especially true in esophageal disorders associated with increased numbers of intraepithelial eosinophils, some of which have just recently been recognized.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the important clinical and pathologic features of the 2 most common disorders associated with esophageal eosinophilic infiltrates--reflux esophagitis and eosinophilic esophagitis--with special emphasis on features that allow the surgical pathologist to distinguish between these disorders. The various forms of drug-induced esophagitis are also discussed because these are frequently underrecognized by pathologists.

DATA SOURCES

Data were extracted from articles identified through PubMed-based research. Histologic figures have been taken from the personal case collection of the author.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux and eosinophilic esophagitis demonstrate overlapping histologic features, which may make their distinction difficult. Drug-induced esophagitis is probably a common phenomenon but is underrecognized by pathologists.

Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma: a study using pH-impedance monitoring

RATIONALE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is considered a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of ILD.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize GER (acid and nonacid) in patients with SSc with and without ILD.

METHODS

Patients with SSc underwent pulmonary high-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) scan and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring off-proton pump inhibitor therapy. The presence of pulmonary fibrosis was assessed using validated HRCT-scores. Reflux monitoring parameters included number of acid and nonacid reflux episodes, proximal migration of the refluxate, and distal esophageal acid exposure. Unless otherwise specified, data are presented as median (25th-75th percentile).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients with SSc (35 female; mean age, 53 yr; range, 24-71; 15 patients with diffuse and 25 with limited SSc) were investigated; 18 (45%) patients with SSc had pulmonary fibrosis (HRCT score >or= 7). Patients with SSc with ILD had higher (P < 0.01) esophageal acid exposure (10.3 [7.5-15] vs. 5.2 [1.5-11]), higher (P < 0.01) number of acid (41 [31-58] vs. 19 [10-23]) and nonacid (25 [20-35] vs. 17 [11-19]) reflux episodes, and higher (P < 0.01) number of reflux episodes reaching the proximal esophagus (42.5 [31-54] vs. 15 [8-22]) compared with patients with SSc with normal HRCT scores. Pulmonary fibrosis scores (HRCT score) correlated well with the number of reflux episodes in the distal (r(2) = 0.637) and proximal (r(2) = 0.644) esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SSc with ILD have more severe reflux (i.e., more reflux episodes and more reflux reaching the proximal esophagus). Whether or not the development of ILD in patients with SSc can be prevented by reflux-reducing treatments needs to be investigated.

Estudo prospectivo comparativo de duas modalidades de posicionamento do sensor de phmetria esofágica prolongada: por manometria esofágica e pela viragem do Ph

RACIONAL: Por padronização aceita internacionalmente, posiciona-se o sensor distal de pHmetria esofágica a 5 cm acima da borda superior do esfíncter inferior do esôfago, localizado por manometria esofágica. Porém, vários autores sugerem técnicas alternativas de posicionamento que prescindem da manometria. Dentre essas, destaca-se a da viragem do pH, tema este controverso pela sua duvidosa confiabilidade. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a adequação do posicionamento do sensor distal de pHmetria pela técnica de viragem do pH, considerando-se a presença, o tipo e o grau de erro de posicionamento que tal técnica proporciona, e também estudar a influência da posição adotada pelo paciente durante a técnica da viragem. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados de modo prospectivo, durante o período de 1 ano, 1.031 pacientes. Durante entrevista clínica, foram registrados os dados demográficos e as queixas clínicas apresentadas. Todos foram submetidos a manometria esofágica para localização do esfíncter inferior do esôfago e a técnica da viragem do pH. A identificação do ponto de viragem foi realizada de dois modos distintos, caracterizando dois grupos de estudo: com o paciente sentado (grupo I - 450 pacientes) e com o paciente em decúbito dorsal horizontal (grupo II - 581 pacientes). Após a identificação do ponto de viragem, o sensor distal de pHmetria era posicionado na posição padronizada, baseada na localização manométrica do esfíncter. Registrava-se onde seria posicionado o sensor de pH se fosse adotada a técnica da viragem. Para avaliação da adequação do posicionamento, considerou-se que o erro é representado pela diferença (em centímetros) entre a localização padronizada (manométrica) e a localização que seria adotada caso fosse empregada a técnica da viragem. Considerou-se que o erro seria grosseiro se fosse maior que 2 cm. Analisou-se também o tipo de erro mais freqüente (se acima ou abaixo da posição padronizada). Foram incluídos todos pacientes que aceitaram participar da pesquisa e excluídos os casos nos quais não se identificou acidificação intragástrica. RESULTADOS: Se fosse adotada a técnica da viragem, haveria erro no posicionamento do sensor em 945 pacientes (91,6%), portanto, o sensor seria posicionado na posição padronizada em apenas 86 (8,4%) casos. Em relação à caracterização do grau de erro, haveria erro considerado grosseiro em 597 (63,2%) pacientes. Em relação ao tipo de erro, o sensor seria posicionado abaixo do local padronizado em 857 (90,7%) casos. Não houve diferença significante entre os dois grupos de estudo em relação a nenhum dos parâmetros analisados, indicando que a posição adotada pelo paciente durante a manobra da viragem não interfere no erro inerente à técnica. CONCLUSÕES: 1. O posicionamento do sensor distal de pHmetria pela técnica da viragem do pH não é confiável. 2. A técnica da viragem proporciona margem de erro expressiva. 3. O tipo de erro mais comum que tal modalidade técnica proporciona é o posicionamento mais distal do sensor, que pode superestimar a ocorrência de refluxo. 4. Não há influência da posição adotada pelo paciente durante a realização da técnica da viragem do pH na eficiência do método.

The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy

INTRODUCTION

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. While the role of acid reflux has been established, the relevance of nonacid reflux in generating symptoms in NERD is unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of impedance-pH monitoring in NERD patients.

METHODS

Patients with typical reflux symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) and normal endoscopy (NERD) underwent a combined impedance-pH monitoring off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Previously investigated 48 healthy volunteers served as controls. Distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4), number of acid and nonacid reflux episodes, 2-min window symptom index (SI; positive if > or = 50%), and symptom association probability (SAP; positive if > or = 95%) were calculated.

RESULTS

Between June 2004 and June 2007, 150 NERD patients (82 women, mean age 48 yr, range 18-78 yr) reported symptoms during the impedance-pH monitoring. NERD patients had more reflux episodes (median [25th-75th percentile]) compared with healthy volunteers (total: 46 [26-65] vs 32 [18-43], P < 0.05; acid: 29 [14-43] vs 17 [8.5-31.0], P < 0.05; and nonacid: 20 [15-27] vs 18 [13.5-26.0], P = NS). Sixty-three (42%) patients had abnormal % time pH < 4. Among 87 patients with normal % time pH < 4., 22 (15%) had a positive SAP for acid, 19 (12%) for nonacid reflux, and 7 (5%) for both. Classifying patients with symptomatic nonacid reflux as having a hypersensitive esophagus reduced the number of patients with functional heartburn from 65 (43%) to 39 (26%).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring for nonacid reflux in NERD patients reduces the proportion of patients classified as having "functional heartburn." Studies assessing the clinical implications of these findings are warranted.

Barium study associated with water siphon test in gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of digital cineradiography associated with the water siphon test (WST) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux and to compare the results with oesophageal motility study, pH monitoring and endoscopy associated with biopsy and histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixty consecutive patients underwent digital cineradiography with WST, motility study, pH monitoring and endoscopy with biopsy. The presence of gastroesophageal reflux, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and intestinal metaplasia was evaluated.

RESULTS

WST vs. pH monitoring showed sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 31%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 53% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 50%; when middle-proximal refluxes only were considered, sensitivity decreased to 45% and specificity increased to 55%. Furthermore, the association between reflux and oesophagitis demonstrated by the chi-square (chi(2)) test proved to be statistically significant both for WST and pH monitoring, whereas the association between reflux and Barrett's oesophagus was not significant for either WST or for pH monitoring. With regard to intestinal metaplasia, WST (middle-proximal refluxes) showed higher sensitivity (64% vs. 58%) and specificity (63% vs. 51%) than pH monitoring, whereas the statistical association between reflux and metaplasia proved to be significant for WST but not for pH monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

WST is a simple, inexpensive and reliable test that might be useful in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A positive WST might be an additional indication for endoscopy with biopsy.

Dynamic MR imaging of the gastroesophageal junction in healthy volunteers during bolus passage

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive dynamic fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during swallowing in healthy volunteers, and to determine esophageal function at the gastroesophageal junction during swallowing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 healthy volunteers underwent MRI while swallowing in the supine position. Dynamic gradient-echo (GRE) sequences (balanced fast field echo [B-FFE]) were employed in three planes on a 1.5T unit using a phased-array body coil. Buttermilk spiked with gadolinium (Gd) chelate (40:1) for bolus passage was used as an oral contrast agent. We evaluated visualization of esophageal bolus transit, bolus transit time (BTT), peristalsis, identification of the gastroesophageal junction, and reflux during the Valsalva maneuver.

RESULTS

The mean visible length of the esophagus was 16.2+/-5.3 cm in the sagittal view, and 13.8+/-4.9 cm in the coronal view. In the sagittal view the BTT was defined in 15 of 20 volunteers and was 7.6+/-1.4 seconds. The BTT in the coronal view was measured in seven of 20 volunteers and was 8+/-1.3 seconds on average. The axial view yielded higher scores (2.25) than the coronal (1.98) and sagittal (1.78) views for identification of the cardia and during the Valsalva maneuver. Bolus contrast was better displayed in the sagittal (2.2) view than in the coronal (2.08) or axial (1.73) planes. In six volunteers, gastroesophageal abnormalities, such as axial hernia, reflux, and nonperistaltic contractions, were identified. For statistical analysis we used the Friedman test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that dynamic MR swallowing is a feasible and reproducible technique that warrants further studies in patients.

Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry is a novel technique for studying gastro-oesophageal reflux. As refluxes are particularly frequent after meals, we carried out this study in order to assess the impact of a Mediterranean diet on normal values of impedancemetry.

METHODS

Twenty-five Italian healthy subjects (13 men, median age 29 years, range 22-67 years) without reflux symptoms were recruited for this study. They underwent oesophageal 24-h impedance + pH-metry. A Mediterranean diet was given to all subjects on the day of examination and its total energy intake was 9668.5 kJ (2300 kcal).

RESULTS

A total of 1518 refluxes were recorded during 24 h with more upright than recumbent episodes (median 15 versus 0; p<0.01). The median total acid exposure time was 0.5% (range 0-4.2%). Acid and weakly acidic refluxes were equally reported (49% versus 51%). Weakly acidic episodes were more frequent than acid ones during 1-h postprandial periods (68% versus 32%; p<0.0001). Liquid-only and mixed refluxes reached the proximal oesophagus (15 cm above lower oesophageal sphincter) in 42.6% of cases. Median acid clearing time was longer than median bolus clearing time (28 s versus 12 s; p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides normal values of pH-impedancemetry in Italian people eating a Mediterranean diet and are suitable for comparative pathophysiological investigations on reflux patients who have dietary habits similar to those of our country.

Association between esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophaeal reflux on barium studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is an association between abnormal primary peristalsis in the esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) on barium studies.

METHODS

A computerized search of radiologic reports revealed 151 patients with esophageal dysmotility (characterized by intermittently decreased or absent peristalsis in the esophagus on upper gastrointestinal tract examinations) who fulfilled our study's entry criteria. These 151 patients were stratified into two groups depending on whether this dysmotility was associated with nonperistaltic contractions (NPCs): 92 patients had no NPCs (Dysmotility and No NPCs Group) and 59 had NPCs (Dysmotility and NPCs Group). An age-matched control group of 92 patients with normal motility was also generated from the radiologic reports. The reports were also reviewed for the presence and degree of GER and other complications of GER. The frequency and degree of GER were tabulated for each group, and the data were analyzed using a Pearson chi square test to determine if significant differences were present in the frequency and degree of GER or other findings among the groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of GER was significantly higher in patients with abnormal peristalsis and no NPCs than in controls (p = 0.02). When GER was stratified based on the degree of reflux, the frequency of moderate-to-marked GER was significantly higher in patients with abnormal peristalsis and no NPCs than in patients with abnormal peristalsis and NPCs (p = 0.01) or in controls (p = 0.0031). The frequency of reflux esophagitis also was significantly higher in patients with abnormal peristalsis and no NPCs than in controls (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients with esophageal dysmotility characterized by intermittently decreased or absent peristalsis without NPCs have a significantly higher frequency and degree of GER than patients with normal motility. The presence of this specific form of esophageal dysmotility on barium studies therefore should suggest underlying reflux disease.

Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of wireless pH monitoring has been touted as a significant advance in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux and associated disorders. We prospectively enrolled patients in a research registry to assess the feasibility and safety in clinical use.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endoscopy with wireless pH studies (Medtronic Bravo pH system) for a 12-month period starting in April 2004 were prospectively enrolled. Probes were placed 6 cm above the endoscopically localized squamocolumnar junction. Successful completion was defined as at least 24 hours of pH recording. Safety data were obtained by review of patient diaries. All results are given as median with 25% to 75% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 217 studies with endoscopy and capsule placement were performed (65% women; median age, 51 years; range, 42-58 years) and included in the study; 1 patient refused participation in the registry and 5 studies were performed without preceding endoscopy and were excluded from this analysis. The pH study was successfully completed in 95.1%; early capsule detachment (1 hours; CI, 0-5 hours) or receiver malfunction occurred in 7 and 2 cases, respectively. There were no immediate adverse effects; 18 patients (9%) complained about significant chest discomfort, associated with odyno- or dysphagia, requiring removal of the capsule in 3 patients (1.5%). Of the completed studies, 56% were abnormal with 32.2% being abnormal on both days, whereas 16.1% and 6.9% only showed increased acid exposure on day 1 or 2, respectively. The higher likelihood of abnormal results for day 1 was associated with a significantly increased esophageal acid exposure during the first 6 hours after capsule insertion on day 1 (total time with pH < 4: 6.9%; CI, 3.2%-16.5%) compared with the corresponding time on day 2 (5.0%; CI, 0.9%-10.8%; P < 0.01), without differences esophageal acidification during the remaining time or differences in recorded activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large registry of patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, our data show that wireless pH studies can be safely completed in more than 90% of patients. Whereas variability during prolonged recordings should be expected, the significantly higher likelihood of abnormal findings during the initial period of pH monitoring suggests a systematic influence of endoscopy and associated premedication, typically performed prior to capsule insertion, which needs to be considered when pH data are analyzed.

Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico

BACKGROUND

The traditional system for esophageal 24-h pH monitoring requires transnasal introduction of the catheter with pH sensors; this technique produces discomfort, inconvenience, and interference with daily activity. Recently, a catheter-free pH monitoring system (Bravo) has been proposed as an alternative and promising method for 24-h pH.

AIM

To evaluate performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to this new technology in our population.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with indication for 24-h pH were included. pH Bravo capsule was placed 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using endoscopic measurement. Symptoms associated were evaluated daily in a personal diary until 7 days after the capsule attachment. Severity of symptoms was assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Capsule detachment was assessed by chest X-ray.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included. Forty-nine were female (mean age 44 +/- 12 yr). Indications for pH monitoring were: nonresponse to proton pump inhibitor therapy in 38 (45%), preoperative evaluation for anti-reflux surgery in 36 (43%), previous failed transnasal 24-h pH monitoring in 6 (7%), and extra-esophageal manifestations of GERD in 4 (5%). The capsule was successfully attached in 95% of patients. At day 7, capsule detachment occurred spontaneously in all cases. Symptoms related to capsule attachment were: chest pain in 26 (33%), foreign body sensation in 11 (14%), nausea in 5 (6%), and 9 (11%) patients had more than one symptom. Severities of those symptoms were mild, and no patient required removal of the capsule. Women and younger patients had more symptoms related to the procedure (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule is a safe, reliable, and tolerable method in patients with GERD.

Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were published in 1995 and updated in 1999. These and other guidelines undergo periodic review. Advances continue to be made in the area of GERD, leading us to review and revise previous guideline statements. GERD is defined as symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. Diagnostic guidelines address empiric therapy and the use of endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry in GERD. Treatment guidelines address the role of lifestyle changes, patient directed (OTC) therapy, acid suppression, promotility therapy, maintenance therapy, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic therapy in GERD. Finally, there is a discussion of the rare patient with refractory GERD and a list of areas in need of additional study.

Features of gastroesophageal reflux disease in women

OBJECTIVES

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is as common in women as in men, and may present with various symptoms, such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, or chest pain. In this study, we evaluated the patterns of symptomatic GERD and the spectrum of disease activity in women and compared them to a cohort of disease- and age-matched men.

METHODS

We studied 543 adults, both men and women, referred for evaluation because of symptoms or signs suggestive of GERD. All patients were assessed immediately before testing using a standardized symptom questionnaire. Endoscopic, ambulatory pH, and motility findings were categorized and graded according to their extent and severity. The prevalence, nature, and severity of esophageal symptoms and their relationship to endoscopic disease severity were then analyzed. Comparisons were made between the two groups, i.e., 341 men (mean age 54, age range 25-90) and 202 women (mean age 50, age range 22-80).

RESULTS

Heartburn without esophagitis was noted in 38% of men and 55% of women patients. Hiatal hernia was noted in 28% of men and in 26% of women. There were no differences in the magnitude of esophageal acid exposure by pH criteria and motility abnormalities between the two groups. The prevalence of endoscopic stages of GERD (0-IV, Savary-Miller classification) was similar between the two groups (p > 0.1, chi2 test) but women were less likely to harbor Barrett's esophagus (p < 0.05, chi2 test). Quantitative esophageal symptom analysis revealed significantly higher symptom severity scores for heartburn (p < 0.01), regurgitation (p < 0.05), belching (p < 0.01), and nocturnal (p < 0.01) symptoms in women as compared to men. Women also experienced higher symptoms scores of lower abdominal symptoms, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and constipation (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among symptomatic adults undergoing evaluation for GERD, women appear to have generally similar patterns of endoscopic severity of GERD as men but they are less likely to harbor Barrett's esophagus. The severity of symptoms in women is significantly more than in men and may contribute to earlier disease recognition and different disease management.

Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system

BACKGROUND

Traditional catheter-based oesophageal pH testing is limited by patient discomfort and the tendency for patients to alter their diet and activities during the study. A catheter-free pH monitoring system (Bravo) designed to avoid these problems has recently become available, but the advantages and limitations of this device have not been fully explored.

AIM

To report our initial experience with this new technology.

METHODS

The records of consecutive patients undergoing Bravo pH monitoring were reviewed. The squamo-columnar junction was localized endoscopically and the pH capsule was placed 6 cm above this junction. All patients were re-endoscoped immediately following placement to document mucosal attachment. Patients were monitored for 24-48 h and then returned the radiotelemetry recording device. Data were subsequently downloaded to a personal computer.

RESULTS

Sixty studies were performed over an 11-month period. In seven of the 60 (12%), the probe did not attach properly, but in six of these a replacement probe was prepared and deployed without difficulty. In one case, the probe could not be attached after two attempts and the procedure was abandoned. During one procedure, the probe was attached to the mucosa at a point 9 cm from the squamo-columnar junction, but a positive test result was obtained. In two cases, the data were not initially retrievable from the recorder, but in one case the manufacturer was able to retrieve the data overnight. Finally, two patients were away from the data recorder for extended periods, resulting in a loss of data, in two cases, but there was sufficient information for interpretation in both studies. Therefore, adequate diagnostic data were obtained in 58 of the 60 (97%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter-free pH testing is a major advance in patient convenience and comfort. The technical difficulties associated with this new technology are minimal and appear to be no more frequent than those seen with catheter-based systems.

Belching: dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease?

OBJECTIVES

Eructation (belching) is a common symptom seen in clinical practice. Because either belching or heartburn may result from transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, it has been proposed that belching may be a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this retrospective study we evaluated the prevalence of belching in dyspepsia and GERD and the relation of belching to acid reflux events documented by pH monitoring.

METHODS

We examined the prevalence, frequency, and severity of belching and other GERD symptoms by use of standardized questionnaires in 180 GERD patients (group A) and 78 dyspeptic controls (group B) referred for evaluation at our institution. GERD was defined as either endoscopic esophagitis (or Barrett's esophagus) or positive DeMeester score (>14.2) on pH monitoring or both. Dyspeptic patients had normal endoscopy and pH studies. We also analyzed the relationship of belching to acid reflux events during the 24-h period of pH studies.

RESULTS

Of 180 GERD patients, 132 (70%) reported belching during pH monitoring, versus 63 of 78 dyspeptic patients (80%) (p = ns). Similarly, 163 of 180 GERD patients (90%) reported heartburn versus 64 of 78 of dyspeptic patients (82%) (p = ns). Review of symptom questionnaires revealed no significant difference in belching severity between groups. However, heartburn and acid regurgitation were significantly more severe among GERD patients. There was a significantly higher correlation of both heartburn and belching with acid events in patients with GERD compared with patients with dyspepsia. In addition, although both belching and heartburn were significantly improved in patients with GERD, belching scores remained unchanged after proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Belching is as common and as severe in patients with dyspepsia as it is in patients with GERD. Belching and heartburn in GERD patients are more likely correlated with episodes of pathological acid reflux. Because belching cannot be clinically used as a discriminatory symptom, ambulatory pH monitoring should be considered to elucidate the relationship of belching to acid reflux in patients with dyspepsia or GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux: comparison of barium studies with 24-h pH monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between massive gastroesophageal reflux (GER) on barium studies and pathologic acid reflux on 24-h pH monitoring.

METHODS

A search of hospital records from January 1997 to January 2001 revealed 28 patients who underwent both barium studies and 24-h pH monitoring. The radiologic reports were reviewed to determine the presence and degree of GER. Patients with reflux to or above the thoracic inlet either spontaneously or with provocative maneuvers in the recumbent position were classified as having massive reflux, whereas the remaining patients with reflux below the thoracic inlet or no reflux comprised the control group. The pH monitoring reports were also reviewed to determine if pathologic acid reflux was present in the recumbent position. The findings on these studies were then compared to determine the frequency of pathologic acid reflux in the recumbent position on pH monitoring in patients with massive reflux on barium studies compared with the control group.

RESULTS

Massive GER was observed on barium studies in 11 (39%) of the 28 patients and reflux below the thoracic inlet or no reflux in the remaining 17 patients (61%) who comprised the control group. All 11 patients (100%) with massive reflux on barium studies had pathologic acid reflux on pH monitoring in the recumbent position compared with six (35%) of 17 patients in the control group (P = 0.0009). The pH in the distal esophagus on pH monitoring was less than 4.0 for 13.1% of the recumbent period for patients with massive GER on barium studies compared with 6.2% of the recumbent period for the control group (P = 0.0076).

CONCLUSION

Although 24-h pH monitoring remains the gold standard for the detection of GER, our experience suggests that patients with massive reflux on barium studies are so likely to have pathologic acid reflux in the recumbent position that these individuals can be further evaluated and treated for their gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without need for pH monitoring.

Esophageal pH monitoring, indications, and methods

Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem that affects a substantial proportion of the American population. It is estimated that the symptoms of GERD may afflict 40% to 45% of Americans each month. The diagnosis of GERD can be difficult, as its symptoms vary from typical symptoms like heartburn to atypical symptoms such as hoarseness, coughing, and chest pain. Most patients present with typical symptoms and are diagnosed with GERD if they respond to empiric trials of acid suppression. Many tests are available to help with diagnosing GERD in patients who either present with atypical symptoms or who do not respond to acid suppression; however, each test has its own shortcomings. The only test that directly measures whether acid is refluxing into the esophagus is the pH probe, but this test is uncomfortable for the patient, can be difficult to interpret, and may not be necessary in all cases. This article reviews the indications for pH monitoring, its technique, its advantages and limitations, and its role the diagnosis of GERD.

Upright versus supine reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Postural measures are early recommendations in the management of heartburn, and are aimed at preventing acid reflux through an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter (LES). However, LES incompetence is found in only a minority of patients, and transient LES relaxations, primarily in the upright position, are currently recognized as the main pathophysiological abnormality in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the importance of supine acid reflux in patients with GERD.

METHODS

Upon review of their clinical, manometric, pH monitoring and endoscopic characteristics, 85 patients with reflux symptoms were classified into three groups: Group A (n=22), consisting of symptomatic patients without esophagitis or pathological reflux; group B (n=38), symptomatic patients with reflux but no endoscopic esophagitis; and group C (n=25), symptomatic patients with both ulcerative or complicated esophagitis and pathological reflux.

RESULTS

All groups were similar in age distribution. Groups B and C had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia and reflux symptoms. Manometry revealed similar LES pressures in groups A and B, but lower LES pressure in group C (P < 0.005). In groups A and B, supine reflux, in terms of percentage of time with pH < 4, was less pronounced than upright reflux (P < 0.0001). In contrast, group C supine reflux was as pronounced as the upright reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients reflux in the upright position. Only patients with complicated esophagitis have significant bipositional acid reflux. These findings suggest that unless the patient has severe reflux disease, postural measures may not be indicated.

Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry

OBJECTIVE

Historically, manometry has been used for sphincter localization before ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring to ensure accurate placement of the probes. Recently, direct-vision placement (DVP), using transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL), has been offered as an alternative technique. Presumably, DVP might be used to precisely place the proximal (pharyngeal) pH probe; however, using DVP, there appears to be no way to accurately position the distal (esophageal) probe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of DVP for pH probe placement using manometric measurement as the gold standard.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing pH monitoring participated in this prospective study. Each subject underwent manometric examination of the esophagus to determine the precise location of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES). In addition, external anatomic landmarks were used to estimate interprobe distances. A physician blinded to the manometry results then placed a pH catheter using DVP so that the proximal probe was located just above the UES. The results were recorded and compared with those obtained by manometry.

RESULTS

Accurate DVP of the proximal pH probe was achieved in 70% (23 of 30) of the subjects. The use of external anatomic landmarks to estimate interprobe distance resulted in accurate positioning of the distal probe in only 40% (12 of 30) of the subjects. Using fixed interprobe distances of 15 cm and 20 cm, distal probe position accuracy was 3% (1 of 30) and 40% (12 of 30), respectively. Therefore, using DVP, the distal esophageal probe was in an incorrect position in 60% to 97% of subjects.

CONCLUSION

For double-probe pH monitoring, the proximal probe can be accurately positioned by DVP; however, there is no precise way to determine the interprobe distance required to correctly position the distal pH probe. Failure to accurately position the distal probe results in grossly inaccurate esophageal acid-exposure times. Thus, manometry is needed to ensure valid double-probe pH monitoring data.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endoscopic, and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation

One hundred and twenty-two patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied (90 with and 32 without esophagitis) with the objective of analyzing possible differences between those with and without esophagitis. Evaluation consisted of clinical interview, endoscopy of the high digestive tract, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. There was no significant difference between the groups in age, sex, or symptoms. The incidence of hiatal hernia was greater in the group with esophagitis. Although the frequency of motor changes was similar, the type of anomaly was different. The reflux pattern was very similar in both groups. Therefore, the concept of reflux disease, esophagitis, and pathological reflux still needs a broader definition for greater diagnostic precision and for comparing the results of different studies on the subject. Normal reflux (confirmed using pH esophageal monitoring) in 12.2% of patients with esophagitis suggests that other factors are implicated in the etiology of the disease besides those measured using this examination.

Twenty-four hour pH monitoring in the assessment of esophageal function

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring is an important test in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. It quantifies esophageal acid exposure while patients pursue their everyday activities without restrictions. The test is performed with a compact portable data logger, miniature pH electrode, and computerized data analysis. The pH electrode should be positioned 5 cm above the manometrically defined lower esophageal sphincter. The patient is asked to press a button on the data logger indicating the onset of the symptom in question, which allows symptoms and acid reflux correlation. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring is generally performed after a therapeutic trial of antireflux medications, preferably proton pump inhibitors.

Decreased sympathetic inhibition in gastroesophageal reflux disease

This study was undertaken to evaluate autonomic nervous system function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Based on clinical criteria, 28 consecutive patients with no history of heart, metabolic, or neurologic disease (mean age 41 y, range 20-62 y) reporting with upper gastrointestinal symptoms typical of gastroesophageal reflux underwent esophageal manometry, ambulatory 24-hour pH study with electrocardiographic monitoring, power spectral analysis of heart rate variability, and cardiovascular tests. Twelve healthy subjects served as controls. A positive result of prolonged esophageal pH study (pH in the distal esophagus less than 4, lasting more than 4.2% of recording time) was observed in 21 patients (reflux group); seven patients were categorized in the nonreflux group. No patient showed arrhythmias or any correlation between heart rate variability changes during electrocardiographic monitoring and episodes of reflux (pH less than 4, lasting more than 5 minutes). A decrease of sympathetic function occurred only in the reflux group (p <0.05) supported by the lower increase of systolic/diastolic blood pressure at sustained handgrip. No other cardiovascular tests showed statistically significant differences in the control or nonreflux groups. Total time reflux showed an inverse correlation with sympathetic function in the reflux group (r = -0.415, p <0.028). We concluded that there is some evidence for a slightly decreased sympathetic function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease that is inversely correlated with total time reflux. In these patients, decreased sympathetic function may cause dysfunction of intrinsic inhibitory control with increased transient spontaneous lower-esophageal sphincter relaxations, thus resulting in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Lack of endoscopic esophagitis does not exclude gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Ambulatory pH testing is also an imperfect standard, and patients with both a normal endoscopy and a normal pH test may still have symptoms produced by acid reflux. A therapeutic trial of acid suppression is often the best approach to these patients. Ideally, therapeutic trials should use a medication with a high degree of efficacy in the treatment of GERD to avoid a false-negative test. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the best currently available medical therapy for all forms of GERD. If the patient does not respond to a once daily PPI, options include increasing the dose of PPIs, and, perhaps, adding another class of agent or studying the patient with an ambulatory pH test. Patients with a negative endoscopy, negative pH test. and those who do not respond to an adequate trial of acid suppression are unlikely to benefit from antireflux surgery.

A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies suggest an association between chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux. Our study aims were 1) to define the prevalence of acid reflux induced cough in the general community, 2) to examine the ability of esophageal testing to identify gastroesophageal reflux related cough, and 3) to assess the utility of omeprazole in a chronic cough algorithm.

METHODS

Patients with chronic cough of unknown etiology, who were mostly from the community, were evaluated. Subjects underwent a chest x-ray, methacholine challenge test, and empiric trial of postnasal drip therapy, and completed daily cough symptom diaries subjectively evaluating cough frequency and severity on a graded scale of 0-4 (combined maximum 8). After excluding other causes of cough, the remaining patients underwent esophageal and pH testing. Those testing positive were randomized to omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks. Follow-up was 1 yr.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients were screened; 48 were excluded. Twenty-three patients were evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease; six (26%) were eventually determined to have an acid-related cough. Of these patients, 17 had a positive pH test, six (35%) of whom showed a striking improvement or resolution of their cough during omeprazole treatment which was sustained for up to 1 yr. Six had a negative pH test, none of whom responded to omeprazole therapy. No significant differences were seen between responders (n = 6) and nonresponders (n = 11) for demographic factors, baseline symptom frequency and duration, or physiological parameters (motility/pH).

CONCLUSIONS

Acid-related chronic cough was present in 26% (six of 23) of patients evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal testing does not reliably identify patients with acid induced chronic cough responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy. We suggest that the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach, after excluding asthma and postnasal drip syndrome, is empiric treatment for 2 wk with a high dose proton pump inhibitor.

The effect of omeprazole on gastro-oesophageal reflux and symptoms during strenuous exercise

BACKGROUND

Strenuous exercise exacerbates gastro-oesophageal reflux and symptoms and this may be diminished by antisecretory medication with omeprazole.

METHODS

Fourteen well-trained athletes (13 men, one woman), who indicated suffering from either heartburn, regurgitation or chest pain during competition running, performed two experimental trials at 2-week intervals using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. During the 6 days preceding the trial and on the trial day itself either 20 mg of omeprazole or a placebo was administered. Two hours after a low-fat breakfast and 1 h after the last study dose, the trial started with five successive 50-min periods: rest, three running periods on a treadmill, and recovery. Reflux (percentage time and number of periods oesophageal pH <4) was measured with an ambulant pH system during these periods.

RESULTS

Compared to rest, reflux lasted significantly longer and occurred more frequently during the first running period, irrespective of the intervention, whereas during the second running period this effect was only observed with the placebo. Reflux occurred for longer and more frequently with the placebo than with omeprazole, but this was significant during the first two running periods only. Seven subjects reported heartburn, regurgitation and/or chest pain during exercise, irrespective of the intervention. Only a minority of the symptom periods was actually associated with acid reflux and in all cases this concerned periods with heartburn.

CONCLUSIONS

Running-induced acid reflux, but not symptoms, were decreased by omeprazole, probably because most symptoms were not related to acid reflux.

Does progesterone fluctuation across the menstrual cycle predispose to gastroesophageal reflux?

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) occurs in 30-50% of all pregnancies. The progressive rise in plasma progesterone has been suggested as a possible mediator of GER during pregnancy. It is not known whether progesterone, at physiological concentrations, has an effect on acid contact time. We sought to evaluate the relationship between progesterone concentrations, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), and acid contact time across the normal menstrual cycle.

METHODS

LESP, 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and serum progesterone levels were determined in 19 healthy women known to have normal menstrual cycles. All tests were performed during the follicular phase (days 2-7) and the luteal phase (days 22-28) of one or two consecutive menstrual cycles.

RESULTS

Despite marked oscillations in progesterone levels between the follicular phase (0.37 +/- 0.3 ng/ml) and luteal phase (4.64 +/- 2.92 ng/ml) we observed no significant differences in LESP (29.82 +/- 9.49 vs 30.45 +/- 8.56 mm Hg) or 24-h ambulatory pH levels (pH < 4) in total time (3.04 +/- 0.3% vs 3.18 +/- 2.51%), upright time (4.41 +/- 3.54% vs 4.18 +/- 3.36%), or supine time (0.77 +/- 1.32% vs 1.42 +/- 2.18%).

CONCLUSIONS

The fluctuations in progesterone levels across the normal menstrual cycle have no significant impact on LESP and 24-h ambulatory pH parameters. Progesterone, at physiological concentrations, does not predispose to GER in healthy menstruating women.

Evaluation and outcome of patients with chronic non-productive cough using a comprehensive diagnostic protocol

BACKGROUND

Asthma, post-nasal drip syndrome (PNDS), and gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) account for many cases of chronic non-productive cough (CNPC). Each may simultaneously contribute to cough even when clinically silent, and failure to recognise their contribution may lead to unsuccessful treatment.

METHODS

Patients (all lifetime non-smokers with normal chest radiographs and spirometric measurements) referred with CNPC persisting for more than three weeks as their sole respiratory symptom underwent histamine challenge, home peak flow measurements, ear, nose and throat (ENT) examination, sinus CT scanning, and 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring. Treatment was prescribed on the basis of diagnoses informed by investigation results.

RESULTS

Forty three patients (29 women) of mean age 47.5 years (range 18-77) and mean cough duration 67 months (range 2-240) were evaluated. On the basis of a successful response to treatment, a cause for the cough was identified in 35 patients (82%) as follows: cough variant asthma (CVA) (10 cases), PNDS (9 cases), GOR (8 cases), and dual aetiologies (8 cases). Histamine challenge correctly predicted CVA in 15 of 17 (88%) positive tests. ENT examination and sinus CT scans each had low positive predictive values for PNDS (10 of 16 (63%) and 12 of 18 (67%) positive cases, respectively), suggesting that upper airways disease frequently co-exists but does not always contribute to cough. When negative, histamine challenge and 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring effectively ruled out CVA and GOR, respectively, as a cause for cough.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive approach aids the accurate direction of treatment and, while CVA, PNDS and GOR remain the most important causes of CNPC to consider, a group with no identifiable aetiology remains.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori colonization on immunoreactive epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-alpha in gastric juice. Its potential pathogenetic implications

Epidermal growth factor (EGF), pivotal in mucosal protection, is partly degraded proteolytically at low pH in the gastric milieu; gastric acid secretion, on the other hand, remains influenced by H. pylori colonization. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the impact of low pH and H. pylori colonization status on immunoreactive EGF and the other member of EGF-family, immunoreactive transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha). Eighteen patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) colonized by H. pylori and 55 NUD patients without H. pylori colonization were investigated. Gastric juice samples were aspirated at the beginning of the endoscopy procedure and immediately placed on ice, and their pH was recorded. The measurement of immunoreactive EGF and TGF-alpha was performed using commercially available radioimmunoassays (RIAs) after adjustment of pH to neutral using an assay buffer. Statistical analysis was performed using sigma-Stat for Windows. The concentration of immunoreactive EGF in patients with NUD colonized by H. pylori was 80% lower (P < 0.02) than in those without H. pylori and in both groups immunoreactive EGF was significantly lower when the pH of gastric juice was below 4.0. The concentration of immunoreactive EGF in H. pylori(+) and H. pylori(-) patients was similar when the pH of aspirated gastric juice was above 4.0. However, with gastric juice pH < 4.0, the EGF concentration was 64% lower in H. pylori(+) patients than H. pylori(-) patients (P < 0.05). In general, the concentration of immunoreactive TGF-alpha in gastric juice was unaffected by H. pylori colonization or pH of gastric juice. It is concluded that: (1) significantly lower immunoreactive EGF concentrations in patients with pH below 4.0 indicate that immunoreactive EGF but not immunoreactive TGF-alpha is affected by an acidic gastric milieu; (2) the further reduction of gastric juice immunoreactive EGF at pH below 4.0 in patients colonized by H. pylori suggests that this microorganism may elaborate factors that accelerate its proteolytic degradation or inhibit its rate of synthesis and/or secretion; and (3) this diminished content of immunoreactive EGF at low pH, especially in patients colonized by H. pylori, may facilitate the development and/or progression of mucosal damage.

Cost-effective management of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Dyspepsia and heartburn are common symptoms in primary care practice. This article outlines the diagnosis and management of these problems with an emphasis on cost-effectiveness as well as the prevention of complications. It reviews what evaluations and treatments have been shown in the literature to be helpful and which have been found to be ineffective or much more expensive without clear benefit. It also clarifies the various diseases that can present as dyspepsia and refers readers to the appropriate articles included in this book.

Respiratory complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease

There is a relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and certain respiratory symptoms and findings. Among these are cough, laryngitis, and wheezing dyspnea. The pathophysiology of these conditions can vary from actual aspiration of gastric content to esophageal mucosal inflammation with the respiratory symptoms induced by a vagally mediated reflex mechanism.

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalences of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux (GER), reflux-associated respiratory symptoms (RARS), and reflux-associated beta-agonist inhaler use in asthmatics.

DESIGN

Questionnaire-based, cross-sectional analytic survey.

SETTING

Outpatient asthma and clinical research clinics attached to the University of Calgary tertiary care centre and two family practices.

PATIENTS

Asthma group consisted of 109 patients referred to an outpatient asthma clinic. First control group consisted of 68 patients visiting their family physicians. Second control group consisted of 67 patients with thyroid disease, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes participating in drug trials.

RESULTS

Among the asthmatics, 77%, 55%, and 24% experienced heartburn, regurgitation, and swallowing difficulties, respectively. Symptoms were less prevalent in the control groups. At least one antireflux medication was required by 37% of asthmatics (p < 0.001, vs controls). None of the asthma medications were associated with an increased likelihood of symptomatic GER. In the week prior to completing the questionnaire, 41% of the asthmatics noted RARS, including cough, dyspnea, and wheeze and 28% used their inhalers while experiencing GER symptoms. Inhaler use correlated with the severity of heartburn (r = 0.28, p < 0.05) and regurgitation (r = 0.40, p < 0.05)

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire demonstrated a greater prevalence of GER symptoms, RARS, and reflux-associated inhaler use in asthmatics. This excessive inhaler use may explain how GER indirectly causes asthma to worsen.

Detecting oesophageal-related changes using electrical impedance tomography

Preliminary work has been carried out using the Sheffield mark II real time EIT system, looking for changes in conductivity which occur in the stomach and oesophagus following a swallow of a small volume of either a conducting or a non-conducting liquid. This has been done using three different configurations: a conventional transverse array placed around the thorax, a rosette array on the abdomen, and a rosette array placed on the back. Results show a significant difference between the two liquids, which can be detected equally well by the three electrode configurations.

Current diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To review recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Original English language reports were obtained through a Medline search of the National Library of Medicine up to and including 1993. The reference lists of all original reports and review articles were searched to locate any further material. In the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, randomized studies were preferentially considered; greatest priority was given to double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Abstracts, nonrandomized trials, and non-English language publications were considered only when other data were unavailable.

RESULTS

Information obtained from histories and physical examinations suggests that GERD occurs in many patients. Evaluation of mucosal injury with use of either endoscopy or air contrast barium radiography is an important early step in the diagnosis of GERD. Endoscopy obtains tissue for histologic study, especially in Barrett's esophagus. Prolonged esophageal pH monitoring is the most useful determinant of the presence and amount of reflux of acid. Patients with GERD should be counseled on lifestyle modification and the use of antacids and antirefluxants. Histamine type 2 receptor antagonists provide symptomatic relief in 32 to 82% of patients with GERD and resolution of verified esophagitis in 0 to 82%. Responses with omeprazole therapy are higher; symptomatic responses were noted in 62 to 94% of patients, and healing of esophagitis occurred in 71 to 96%. Promotility agents and surgical therapy have a role in selected patients.

CONCLUSION

GERD is a chronic disorder that often necessitates individualized lifelong therapy. Many questions remain to be answered about the cost-effectiveness of both diagnostic tests and therapy for GERD.

Symptoms and disease severity in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The definition of criteria relevant to disease severity assessments should be considered in parallel with the long-term aims of treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). There is no doubt that the resolution of symptoms is the major management aim. Heartburn and regurgitation are specific for GORD when they are the predominant symptoms, but prove to be insensitive when the diagnosis of GORD is based on the measurement of oesophageal acid exposure. A relationship between the frequency of heartburn and the degree of acid exposure has been reported in GORD patients both with and without oesophagitis. GORD may also, however, cause a wide spectrum of atypical symptoms (e.g. non-cardiac chest pain or respiratory symptoms). To the extent that a causal relationship between these symptoms and reflux episodes has been established, evaluation of symptom severity should also encompass these atypical presentations. The role of symptoms in the prediction of relapse of oesophagitis is controversial, but in several studies the presence of residual symptoms of GORD at the time of healing has indicated a greater probability of relapse. Endoscopy is a useful technique for the evaluation of disease severity. Indeed, even typical symptoms may not predict the presence and severity of oesophagitis in an individual patient. Despite the fact that the interpretation of therapeutic trials is often impeded by differences in the grading systems used, healing rates of oesophageal lesions are inversely proportional to the initial severity of oesophagitis when drugs such as H2-receptor antagonists are used. Differences are less evident with highly effective drugs such as omeprazole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux. Clinical, diagnostic, and pathogenetic aspects

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common cause of chronic cough. Moreover, chronic cough can be the sole presenting manifestation of GER disease (GERD). It has been suggested recently that GER most often causes chronic cough by stimulating the distal esophagus. To gain further diagnostic and pathophysiologic knowledge, we prospectively evaluated a group of patients with chronic cough likely to be due to GER with extensive gastrointestinal and respiratory studies and then observed their response to antireflux therapy.

METHODS

We prospectively characterized 12 subjects whose chronic cough was likely to be due to GER by chest radiographs, barium esophagography, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring (EPM) with probes in the distal and proximal esophagus, esophagoscopy, and bronchoscopy. Then, prior to instituting antireflux therapy, we objectively counted coughs during the distal esophageal infusion of 0.1 N HCl or 0.9 percent saline solution administered in a randomized, double-blind, standardized fashion (ie, Bernstein acid-perfusion test).

RESULTS

Gastroesophageal reflux was determined to cause cough in all subjects based on disappearance of cough with antireflux therapy. It was clinically "silent" in 75 percent. The EPM was the test most frequently abnormal (sensitivity, 92 percent). Distal esophageal data revealed that 10 of 12 subjects had GER-induced coughs (12 +/- 12) while only 7 of 12 had an abnormal esophageal pH conventional parameter (eg, percent time pH < 4). Compared with the distal esophagus, GER to the proximal esophagus occurred (p = 0.017) and induced cough (p = 0.004) less often. Compared with baseline (9.3 +/- 17.6), there were no differences in coughs induced by the infusion of saline solution (9.2 +/- 15.9) or acid (15.1 +/- 26.7); the number of coughs induced by acid was negatively correlated with distal esophageal acid-GER events during EPM (r = -0.64, p = 0.01). Neither bronchoscopy nor chest radiographs were consistent with aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clinical profile that prospectively predicts which patients have chronic cough due to GER. The cough was most likely due to stimulation of the distal esophagus, not aspiration. Intraesophageal acid is unlikely to be the sole mediator in gastric juice causing the cough. While EPM is the single most helpful diagnostic test, conventionally utilized diagnostic indices of GERD can be misleadingly normal; observing GER-induced coughs is more frequently helpful.