Needle catheter jejunostomy: a controlled, prospective, randomized trial in patients with gynecologic malignancy

Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at significant risk of malnutrition with incidence rates described as being between 28% to 67%. Nutrition interventions may improve clinical outcomes positively, nutritional status or quality of life measures in this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

This review was conducted to assess the effects of nutrition interventions during the perioperative period for women with ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted of the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2012, Issue 7), Medline (1946 to July week 4 2012), Embase (1980 to 2012 week 31), DARE (to 7th August 2012) AMED (1985 to April 2012), BNI (1992 to April 2012), CINAHL (to April 2012). We also searched trials databases, conference proceedings and related citation lists. Reference listings were handsearched. No restrictions were applied on language or date.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which women 18 years and over with any stage of ovarian cancer, including recurrent cancer, were in the perioperative phase of treatment and received any type of nutrition intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Titles and abstracts were screened by two review authors with study selection discussed by a team. Pairs of review authors worked independently on data collection and compared findings.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 4092 titles were screened and 14 full text reports reviewed; a single small study met the inclusion criteria. In the included RCT, 40 women (35 with ovarian cancer) had extensive elective surgery including bowel resection for treatment of gynaecological malignancy. Randomisation was made to either early oral feeding (oral fluids in the first 24 hours, solid foods on the following day) or to a 'traditional' feeding regimen where oral fluids and foods were delayed until there was evidence of bowel function. Most women in the early feeding group (14/18) were able to resume eating solid food one day after surgery. This resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay with no increase in postoperative complications or change in quality of life measures in comparison with the women on the 'traditional' feeding regimen. The incidence of nausea and vomiting during the postoperative stay was similar in both groups and was noted in slightly more than half of the women. Overall survival was evaluated until 30 days following discharge from hospital; in this period, there was one death of a woman who had been in the 'traditional oral feeding' group, cause of death was not noted. We assessed risk of bias and found no high risk of bias was identified in the methodology and reporting of the included study, although there was an increased risk of bias due to the small size of the study in which not all of the women had ovarian cancer.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although women with ovarian cancer have been shown to be at risk of malnutrition, there is a lack of evidence derived from RCTs evaluating the identification, assessment and treatment of malnutrition during the perioperative phase of treatment. There is evidence from one small study that some women with ovarian cancer undergoing surgery with associated bowel resection may safely commence oral fluids within 24 hours of surgery and solid foods on the following day. Further research is required, including a RCT, to generate guidance concerning the treatment of malnutrition in this patient group.

Comparison of different nutritional assessments and body-composition measurements in detecting malnutrition among gynecologic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed global nutritional assessment tools and body-composition measurements in gynecologic cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the convergent validity of different nutritional tools such as the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), serum albumin, skinfold-thickness measurements, and total-body potassium (TBK) and body density measurements to identify gynecologic cancer patients at risk of malnutrition.

DESIGN

We assessed the nutritional status of 194 patients with suspected or proven gynecologic cancer according to the SGA and the scored PG-SGA, and skinfold-thickness (n = 145), TBK (n = 51), and body density measurements (n = 42) before primary treatment.

RESULTS

According to the SGA and the scored PG-SGA global rating, 24% of gynecologic cancer patients were classified as malnourished. The prevalence of malnutrition was highest in ovarian (67%) and lowest in endometrial (6%) cancer patients. The ability of the PG-SGA score (P < 0.001) and albumin (P < 0.001), triceps skinfold-thickness (P = 0.041), and TBK (P = 0.005) measurements to predict the SGA was significantly better than chance. TBK significantly correlated with measurements associated with protein depletion, including age (P < 0.001), arm muscle area (P < 0.001), fat-free mass (P < 0.001), and the PG-SGA score (P = 0.009). Multiple regression analysis showed that, together, the PG-SGA score and arm muscle area adjusted for age accounted for 66% of total TBK variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The PG-SGA is significantly associated with subjective and objective parameters and is a widely recognized, clinically relevant method of evaluating nutritional status. It therefore seems most appropriate for identifying malnourishment in gynecologic cancer patients.

Do Data Support Nutrition Support? Part II. Enteral Artificial Nutrition

Artificial nutrition is widely advocated as adjunctive care in patients with a variety of underlying diseases. In recent years more emphasis has been placed on delivering it directly into the gastrointestinal tract through tubes in the stomach or proximal small intestine (enteral nutrition). Because the efficacy of any therapeutic intervention is best established by demonstrating it in one or more randomized controlled trials, this review focuses on data from such studies. The specific issue to be assessed is the ability of enteral nutrition to influence the mortality and morbidity of various diseases, a question that was addressed in depth in a recent systematic review. This article presents the highlights of that systematic review and puts it in context with the perspective of a practicing food and nutrition professional. Using established search strategies, 30 randomized controlled trials were identified that compared enteral nutrition to no artificial nutrition. In addition, other randomized controlled trials were identified that did provide some insight into the clinical utility of enteral nutrition. The randomized controlled trials were stratified by the underlying disease state. No high-quality evidence indicated that enteral nutrition had any beneficial effect on clinical outcome. Low-quality evidence, which tends to overestimate the treatment effect, suggested that enteral nutrition may be useful in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications and infection rates in intensive care units, improving mortality in chronic liver disease, and reducing length of stay when provided as trophic feeding to low-birth-weight neonates who are also receiving intravenous artificial nutrition. Enteral nutrition was not helpful when given during the first week to patients with dysphagic strokes. Thus, the randomized controlled trials that have compared enteral nutrition to no artificial nutrition have only found benefit when the methodologic rigor of the studies is inadequate to prevent bias from interfering with the interpretation of the data. No high-quality data are available to prove that enteral nutrition is of benefit.

Nutrition Society Symposium on ‘End points in clinical nutrition trials’ Death, morbidity and economics are the only end points for trials

In order to determine whether surrogate markers predict clinical outcome, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of nutrition supportv. no nutrition support that have reported at least one clinical outcome (mortality, infections, total complications, or duration of hospitalization) and at least one nutritional outcome (energy or protein intake, weight gain, N balance, albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, three anthropometric measures, skin testing, lymphocyte count) were assessed for concordance. If changes in nutritional markers predict clinical outcome, changes in both outcomes should go in the same direction. Concordance is defined as both outcomes changing in the same direction or both outcomes showing no difference. Discordance is defined as one outcome changing and the other not (partial) or both outcomes changing in opposite directions (complete). Ninety-nine RCT were identified, of which most were underpowered to see statistically significant changes, especially in clinical outcomes. Thus, the results were analysed only in relation to the direction of the respective changes in outcomes. Forty-eight comparisons (4×12) were made. The rates of concordance were ≤50% in forty-one of forty-eight comparisons; the rate was never >75%. A complete discordance rate of ≥25% was present in forty-three (≥50% in thirteen) of the forty-eight comparisons. The discordance was usually a result of the nutritional outcome being better than the clinical outcome. Changes in nutritional markers do not predict clinical outcomes. Before adopting any surrogate marker as an end point for a clinical trial, it has to be known that improving it will result in patient benefit.

Does enteral nutrition affect clinical outcome? A systematic review of the randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Both parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) are widely advocated as adjunctive care in patients with various diseases. A systematic review of 82 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PN published in 2001 found little, if any, effect on mortality, morbidity, or duration of hospital stay; in some situations, PN increased infectious complication rates.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the effect of EN or volitional nutrition support (VNS) in individual disease states from available RCTs.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review. RCTs comparing EN or VNS with untreated controls, or comparing EN with PN, were identified and separated according to the underlying disease state. Meta-analysis was performed when at least three RCTs provided data. The evidence from the RCTs was summarized into one of five grades. A or B, respectively, indicated the presence of strong or weak (low-quality RCTs) evidence supporting the use of the intervention. C indicated a lack of adequate evidence to make any decision about efficacy. D indicated that limited data could not support the intervention. E indicated either that strong data found no effect, or that either strong or weak data suggested that the intervention caused harm.

PATIENTS AND SETTINGS

RCTs could include either hospitalized or nonhospitalized patients. The EN or VNS had to be provided as part of a treatment plan for an underlying disease process.

INTERVENTIONS

The RCT had to compare recipients of either EN or VNS with controls not receiving any type of artificial nutrition or had to compare recipients of EN with recipients of PN.

OUTCOME MEASURES

These were mortality, morbidity (disease specific), duration of hospitalization, cost, or interventional complications. SUMMARY OF GRADING: A: No indication was identified. B: EN or VNS in the perioperative patient or in patients with chronic liver disease; EN in critically ill patients or low birth weight infants (trophic feeding); VNS in malnourished geriatric patients. (The low-quality trials found a significant difference in survival favoring the VNS recipients in the malnourished geriatric patient trials; two high-quality trials found nonsignificant differences that favored VNS as well.) C: EN or VNS in liver transplantation, cystic fibrosis, renal failure, pediatric conditions other than low birth weight infants, well-nourished geriatric patients, nonstroke neurologic conditions, AIDS; EN in acute pancreatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nonmalnourished geriatric patients; VNS in inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, cardiac disease, pregnancy, allergic patients, preoperative bowel preparation. D: EN or VNS in patients receiving nonsurgical cancer treatment or in patients with hip fractures; EN in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; VNS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. E: EN in the first week in dysphagic, or VNS at any time in nondysphagic, stroke patients who are not malnourished; dysphagia persisting for weeks will presumably ultimately require EN.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence for not using EN in the first week in dysphagic, and not using VNS at all in nondysphagic, stroke patients who are not malnourished. There is reasonable evidence for using VNS in malnourished geriatric patients. The recommendations to consider EN/VNS in perioperative/liver/critically ill/low birth weight patients are limited by the low quality of the RCTs. No evidence could be identified to justify the use of EN/VNS in other disease states.

Malnutrition among gynaecological cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the nutritional status of patients with gynaecological cancer.

DESIGN

A prospective study assessing the nutritional status of gynaecological patients with suspected or proven gynaecological cancer.

SETTING

Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Brisbane, Australia; a tertiary referral centre for gynaecological cancer.

SUBJECTS

One hundred forty-five patients with suspected or proven gynaecological cancer aged 20-91 years.

INTERVENTION

Scored patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and serum albumin before treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen (80%) patients were categorized as PG-SGA class A, 29 (20%) patients were PG-SGA B and none of the patients were PG-SGA C. Ovarian cancer patients had significantly lower serum albumin levels (P=0.003) and higher PG-SGA scores (P<0.001) than patients with other types of cancer and benign conditions. Sixty-seven per cent of patients with ovarian cancer were classified as PG-SGA B. After adjusting for patient's age, body mass index and albumin level, ovarian cancer patients were 19 times more likely to be categorized as PG-SGA class B compared to patients with benign conditions (95% confidence interval: 3.03-129.8; P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition in gynaecological cancer patients is a significant problem, especially among those patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

Nutrición enteral con yeyunostomía con catéter de aguja en la anastomosis esofágica. Complicaciones de la técnica

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of complications associated with the use of surgical needle catheter jejunostomy and tolerance to enteral nutrition.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We performed a retrospective study of 58 consecutive patients, who underwent esophageal or gastric resection with esophageal anastomosis and needle catheter jejunostomy. The variables studied were initiation of enteral nutrition, duration of perfusion, complications associated with the use of jejunostomy, and tolerance to enteral nutrition.

RESULTS

Mortality in the series was 1.7%. Infusion of enteral nutrition was started at mean of 4.84+/-5.01 days and lasted for a mean of 7.9+/-7.5 days. In one patient the jejunostomy could not be used due to catheter obstruction and in another 2 patients some resistance to perfusion of nutrition was observed but these patients could be fed through the tube. One patient had to undergo reintervention due to peritonitis caused by extravasation of the enteral nutrition within the peritoneal cavity. Catheter withdrawal was difficult in 2 patients; of these, 1 patient required investigation of the skin wound under local anesthetic. The overall rate of jejunostomy-related complications was 10.3%. Tolerance of enteral nutrition was acceptable in 41 patients, the infusion rate was reduced in 6 patients and infusion was discontinued due to intolerance in 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Because needle catheter jejunostomy produces low morbidity and good tolerance to enteral nutrition, it is a valid alternative in patients with esophageal anastomosis.

Early enteral supply of fiber and Lactobacilli versus conventional nutrition: a controlled trial in patients with major abdominal surgery

OBJECTIVE

Early enteral nutrition with fiber-containing solutions plus Lactobacillus may reduce bacterial translocation and minimize the incidence of infections after surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized trial in three groups (n = 30/group) of patients after major abdominal surgery, we compared our previous regimen with parenteral nutrition or fiber-free enteral nutrition (group A) with enteral fiber-containing nutrition with living Lactobacillus (group B) and heat-killed Lactobacillus (group C). The main endpoint was the development of bacterial infection. Other analyzed parameters were the durations of antibiotic therapy and hospital stay, non-infectious complications, side effects of the nutrition, and onset of bowel movement. Routine parameters, nutritional parameters, and cellular immune status in the blood were measured preoperatively and on 1, 5, and 10 d postoperatively.

RESULTS

The incidence of infections was significantly lower (P = 0.01) in groups B and C with enteral nutrition containing fibers (10% each) than in group A (30%). Patients in group B received antibiotics for a significantly shorter time (P = 0.04) than did the patients in groups A and C. The length of hospital stay and the incidence of non-infectious complications did not differ significantly. Fibers and lactobacilli were well tolerated. There were no general benefits of living Lactobacillus as opposed to heat-killed Lactobacillus in the entire study population, but benefits were observed in the patients with gastric and pancreas resections, although no statistical analysis was done due to their small numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Early enteral nutrition with fiber-containing solutions reduced the rate of postoperative infections in comparison with parenteral nutrition and fiber-free enteral formula. Addition of living Lactobacillus seemed to increase the benefits in patients with gastric and pancreatic resections.

Routine protein energy supplementation in adults: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether routine oral and enteral nutritional supplementation can improve the weight, anthropometry, and survival of adult patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of oral or enteral protein supplementation in adults. Trials were identified from Medline (Silver Platter 3.11, 1966-96), reference lists of identified studies and review articles, and communication with feed manufacturers.

SUBJECTS

Randomised controlled trials comparing oral or enteral protein supplementation with no routine supplementation. All trials of adult subjects were included except those addressing nutrition in pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in body weight and anthropometry (mid-arm muscle circumference), and all cause case fatality recorded at the end of scheduled follow up. Body weight and anthropometry were analysed as the weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals of the percentage change in these variables. Case fatality was analysed with odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

32 eligible reports (2286 randomised patients) published between February 1979 and July 1996 were identified, of which 30 (93.8%) (2062 randomised patients) reported outcomes of interest. Case fatality data were available for 1670 (81%) patients, and continuous variable data for up to 1607 (78%) patients. The treatment group receiving routine nutritional supplementation showed consistently improved changes in body weight and anthropometry compared with controls; weighted mean difference 2.06% (95% confidence interval 1.63% to 2.49%) and 3.16% (2.43% to 3.89%) respectively. The pooled odds ratio for death in the treatment group was 0.66 (0.48 to 0.91, 2P<0.01). Apparent benefits were observed in several prespecified subgroups of patients, treatment settings, and interventions, but were not evident if trials with less robust methodology were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine oral or enteral supplementation seems to improve the nutritional indices of adult patients, but there are insufficient data in trials which meet strict methodological criteria to be certain if mortality is reduced. Benefits were not restricted to particular patient groups. Further large pragmatic randomised controlled trials of routine nutritional supplementation are justified.