The efficacy and tolerability of norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol (250 micrograms of norgestimate/35 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol): results of an open, multicenter study of 59,701 women

The paradigm of norgestimate: a third-generation testosterone-derivative progestin with a peripheral anti-androgenic activity and the lowest risk of venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Norgestimate (NGM) is a testosterone derivative with peculiar receptor activities.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review of the available data on the pharmacotherapy of NGM in combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in terms of contraceptive efficacy, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, safety, tolerability and bleeding patterns. A comprehensive literature review was conducted in August 2020 using PubMed with the keyword 'norgestimate'.

EXPERT OPINION

NGM shows a mild estrogenic activity associated with anti-mineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic properties, largely responsible for the cardiovascular safety profile. The anti-androgenic property depends on the androgen receptor (AR) nuclear translocation (AR trafficking and its subnuclear distribution), the inhibition of 5α-reductase activity (it possesses higher activity compared to other available progestins), and the increase on sexual hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels if combined with an estrogenic counterpart. NGM is one of the molecules that best modulates the power of ethinyl-estradiol on the thromboembolic risk, being associated with the lowest VTE risk between different CHCs. NGM has the advantage of retaining peripheral anti-androgenic activity, demonstrated by the impact on lipid and glucose metabolism, and it should be preferred if compared with other similar progestins of the same class of risk which are much more androgenic, such as levonorgestrel.

Consensus Statement on the Use of Oral Contraceptive Pills in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Women in India

Objective:

To provide consensus recommendations for health-care providers on the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women in India.

Participants:

Extensive deliberations, discussions, and brainstorming were done with different fraternities (specialists) being involved. These included endocrinologists, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, dermatologists, public health experts, researchers, and a project manager with a team to develop the guideline.

Evidence:

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 2003 to December 2017 using appropriate-controlled vocabulary (e.g., oral contraceptive pills, polycystic ovarian syndrome, long term outcomes, infertility). Clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies' publications and data were also reviewed to suggest the recommendations.

Process:

The working group for guideline committee included members from the PCOS Society (India), Indian Society for Assisted Reproduction, The Mumbai Obstetric and Gynecological Society, The Endocrine Society of India, Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists, Cosmetic Dermatology Society (India), Academicians from Medical Colleges, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, and a Research Associate. The core team included five reproductive endocrinologists, five gynecologists, five dermatologists, three endocrinologists, two public health experts and one research associate.

Conclusions:

This consensus statement provides the guidance/recommendations for Indian practitioners regarding the use of OCP in women with PCOS. PCOS is one of the common endocrinopathies encountered in gynecological/endocrine practice. The spectrum of this disorder may range from prepubertal girls with premature pubarche, young girls with hirsutism, acne and anovulatory cycles, married women with infertility, and elderly women. Although obesity is a common feature for most PCOS patients, 'lean PCOS' also exists. For several years, OCPs have played an important role in the symptom management of PCOS women. This is due to the fact that OCPs decrease the luteinizing hormone, reduce androgen production, and increase sex hormone-binding globulin, which binds androgens. Several new formulations of OCPs have been developed to decrease the side effects. This includes use of less androgenic progestins and lower doses of ethinyl estradiol. These consensus recommendations help the health provider to choose the right type of OCPs, which will alleviate the symptoms with least side effects. It also gives insight into the indications, contraindications, and concerns regarding its short, intermediate and long-term use.

Metabolic Effects of a Commonly Used Combined Hormonal Oral Contraceptive in Women With and Without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Data on combined hormonal oral contraceptives' (OCs) effects on metabolic changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have been conflicting and were predominantly based on OCs with cyproterone acetate (unavailable in the United States) Most studies did not include normal women as controls. We compared metabolic changes before and after an OC commonly used in the United States between women with and without PCOS.

METHODS

Ten PCOS and 20 control women took ethinyl estradiol 35 μg and norgestimate 0.18/0.215/0.25 mg. Fasting glucose and insulin, area-under-the-curve (AUC) glucose and insulin, insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity index [HOMA-ISI] and Matsuda index), insulinogenic index (Δinsulin0-30 minutes/Δglucose0-30 minutes), blood pressure, and lipids were evaluated at baseline and after three cycles of OC.

RESULTS

At baseline, PCOS women had lower insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index p = 0.0093, HOMA-ISI p = 0.0397), higher fasting insulin (p = 0.0495), fasting glucose (p = 0.0393), AUC insulin (p = 0.0023), and triglycerides (p = 0.0044) versus controls. Baseline AUC glucose did not differ between PCOS women and controls. After 3 months of OC use, glucose tolerance worsened in PCOS women versus controls (p = 0.0468). Higher baseline androgens were predictive of worsened glucose tolerance, and a reduction of AUC insulin during OC use. The insulinogenic index significantly decreased in PCOS women (p < 0.01), while fasting insulin and insulin resistance significantly worsened in control women.

CONCLUSION

Women with PCOS exhibited worsened glucose tolerance (demonstrated by AUC glucose) after 3 months of a commonly used OC compared with control women. Larger studies with longer follow-up should confirm these findings.

Combined hormonal contraceptive use among women with known dyslipidemias: a systematic review of critical safety outcomes

CONTEXT

Dyslipidemias represent a spectrum of lipid disorders that are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In addition, elevated triglycerides are known to be associated with pancreatitis. Though less clear, it is possible that dyslipidemias may also contribute to risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Ethinyl estradiol and progestogen, contained within combined hormonal contraception, are known to impact lipid metabolism.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate from the literature whether use of combined hormonal contraception (CHC), including combined oral contraception (COC) pills, transdermal patch, vaginal ring or injectables, modifies the relative risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, VTE or pancreatitis among women with known dyslipidemias and to determine if existing lipid abnormalities worsen with CHC use.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all articles in all languages published between inception and September 2014 relevant to dyslipidemia, CHC use and serious adverse events (MI, stroke, VTE or pancreatitis). The quality of each individual study was assessed using the system for grading evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

RESULTS

From 306 articles identified by our search strategy, 3 articles met inclusion criteria. In a poor-quality case-control study, women with hypercholesterolemia but no COC use had an increased risk of MI (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-6.8), as did women who used COCs but did not have hypercholesterolemia (adj OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8), compared with non-COC users without hypercholesterolemia; women with both COC use and hypercholesterolemia had an adjusted OR of 24.7 (95% CI 5.6-108.5) compared with women with neither risk factor. A poor-quality cohort study examined COC users and reported that women with dyslipidemia had increased risk for VTE [crude risk ratio (RR) 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85] and transient ischemic attacks or cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.51-2.06) compared to those without dyslipidemia. Another poor-quality cohort study provided direct evidence on changes in lipid levels among COC users with dyslipidemia. A minority of women with elevated total cholesterol or triglyceride levels at baseline showed normal results (25% and 28%, respectively) after 6 cycles of COC use. No evidence regarding risks associated with use of other CHC methods was identified. No evidence was identified for the outcome of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

Limited data from poor-quality observational studies suggest that women with known dyslipidemias using CHC may be at increased risk for MI and may experience a minimal increase in risk for CVA or VTE. No evidence was identified on risk for pancreatitis in this context. The impact of CHC exposure on the status of lipid abnormalities over time, an intermediate marker for disease, is also unclear. Given the significant limitations of this body of evidence, the importance of access to effective contraception and theoretical concerns raised about the use of CHCs by women with known dyslipidemias, additional rigorous studies are needed to best estimate true associations. Contraceptive decision making should include consideration of both the known and theoretical risks of a given CHC method, safety and acceptability of alternative contraceptive methods, and risks associated with unintended pregnancy.

Divergent effects of a combined hormonal oral contraceptive on insulin sensitivity in lean versus obese women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a commonly used combined hormonal oral contraceptive (OC) on carbohydrate metabolism in obese as compared with lean women.

DESIGN

6-month prospective study.

SETTING

Clinical research center at an academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Premenopausal nondiabetic women with body mass index <25 kg/m(2) (n = 15) or >30 kg/m(2) (n = 14).

INTERVENTION(S)

Ethinyl estradiol (35 μg) and norgestimate (0.18/0.215/0.25 mg) for 6 cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Insulin sensitivity by frequent sampling intravenous glucose tolerance test; other indices of insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment of insulin sensitivity index [ISI HOMA], the Matsuda index); fasting lipid panel.

RESULT(S)

Insulin sensitivity changed from 6.62 ± 3.69 min(-1)/mIU/L (baseline) to 8.23 ± 3.30 min(-1)/mIU/L (6 months) in lean women, and from 4.36 ± 2.32 to 3.82 ± 2.32 min(-1)/mIU/L in obese women. Divergent effects on insulin sensitivity were also observed with ISI HOMA and the Matsuda index. Low-density lipoprotein increased by approximately 20 mg/dL in both the lean and obese groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Lean and obese women exhibit differential changes in insulin sensitivity when given 6 months of a commonly used oral contraceptive. The mechanisms of these differences and whether these divergent effects persist in the long term require further investigation.

Tailoring combination oral contraceptives to the individual woman

BACKGROUND

Over the last 50 years, there has been intense interest in the type of progestin used in combined oral contraceptives (COC) in an attempt to exploit novel properties and minimize adverse events. At the same time, the dose of synthetic estrogen, ethinylestradiol, in COC pills has been reduced to minimize risks for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism. New formulations, including extended-cycle or continuous-use COCs or those that use a natural estrogen, estradiol, may offer improvements over their predecessors.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed to encompass studies published since 1990 that pertain to the pharmacology of estrogens and progestins used in COCs, risks and adverse events associated with COCs, and extended or continuous-use COCs.

RESULTS

New progestins structurally related to progesterone and spironolactone may exhibit more selective binding to the progesterone receptor and lack androgenic adverse effects associated with progestins structurally related to testosterone. Recently, COCs containing natural (17β-estradiol) or conjugated estrogen (estradiol valerate) rather than ethinylestradiol have been developed in order to move to a more natural estrogen. Although many of the new progestins incorporated into COCs have not demonstrated the negative effects on lipid metabolism and other adverse events associated with the traditional progestins, the goal of attaining good cycle control has yet to be achieved. Extended-cycle and continuous-use regimens are now available that reduce the frequency of menses, but breakthrough bleeding remains a problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate counseling to raise awareness of the specific characteristics of the different COC options available may optimize adherence and patient acceptability.

Enhancing oral contraceptive success: the potential of new formulations

Reductions in oral contraceptive (OC) estrogen dose and the development of new progestins have resulted in formulations that maintain acceptable cycle control while improving safety. However, the potential safety benefits of low-estrogen doses may be offset by less acceptable cycle control. These observations have led to the development of 2 triphasic OC formulations containing norgestimate and desogestrel in combination with 25 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE). Both of these 25-microg EE triphasic OCs balance fewer estrogen-related side effects with good cycle control comparable to OCs containing higher estrogen doses. However, questions remain about the risk of venous thromboembolism associated with OCs containing desogestrel. A new monophasic 30-microg EE OC contains drospirenone, a spironolactone analogue with which there is limited experience. Although initial data with this OC are intriguing, product labeling highlights safety issues related to its antimineralocorticoid effects and the potential for hyperkalemia. Further experience with this formulation will determine its role in contraceptive practice.

[Factors associated with weight gain in women using oral contraceptives: results of a French 2001 opinion poll survey conducted on 1665 women]

OBJECTIVES

To study how often women put on weight when on the pill and to analyse the relationship between that gain in weight and the characteristics of the last 2 types of pill that had been used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three thousand six hundred and nine women representative of the French female population, aged 15 to 45, were recruited thanks to a survey that took place in 2001. Our study mainly concerned the 1665 women who were actually taking the pill at the time of the survey. The data were collected from self-questionnaires.

RESULTS

Thirty per cent of women declared to have gained weight since using their latest pill - only one more kg for 4% of them, 2 kg for 10% but 3 kg or more for the remaining 16%. Gain in weight was more frequent with women less than 25 years of age (35%) than with older ones (29%). This gain in weight did not vary according to either the type of pill, which was then used, or the length of time spent in using it, or the age of first using. It was more frequent when found with other side effects such as breast pain, skin disorders or metrorrhaegias; it was less frequent among women who had already been on the pill in the past than among women using an oral contraceptive for the first time (28% vs 34%; P = 0.008). The shorter the taking the latest pill had been, the greater the frequency of gain in weight was (P = 0.005), women who had presented the most side-effects in the past having changed their pill more rapidly than other women. Finally, a gain in weight was found far more often in women who "did" put on weight with their latest pill than in those who "did not" (53% vs 14%; P = 0.0001). All in all, 8% of women who had been previously been taking the pill had given up this method over a weight problem.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Putting on weight when on the pill being in the long term independent of the type of patent medicine used, it would seem necessary to orientate new research centred both on a chemical and a biological as well as a nutritional approach, so as to answer one of the major preoccupations of oral contraceptive users to the fullest.

Serum distribution of the major metabolites of norgestimate in relation to its pharmacological properties

Norelgestromin (NGMN) and levonorgestrel (LNG) are the main active metabolites of norgestimate (NGM), but their relative contributions to the pharmacological effects of NGM are unclear. We have therefore determined the serum distribution of these NGM metabolites and assessed their steady-state concentrations in women following >or=3 cycles of oral contraceptive (OC) use. The administration of 250 microg NGM/35 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) resulted in significantly higher sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels (p = 0.002), and 30% lower serum non-protein-bound (NPB) levels of testosterone, when compared to treatment with 150 microg LNG/30 microg EE. We also confirmed that NGMN does not bind to SHBG, and found that 97.2% of this metabolite is bound to albumin while only 2.8% is in the NPB fraction. In contrast, most of the LNG was bound to SHBG (92.5% and 87.2% after NGM/EE and LNG/EE treatment, respectively), and the NPB fraction of LNG (0.7%) during NGM/EE treatment was lower (p < 0.001) than during LNG/EE treatment (1.4%). Combining these serum distributions with the C(max) and AUC(0-24h) data obtained after NGM/EE treatment gave NPB and albumin-bound values of NGMN that were much greater than the corresponding LNG values. Furthermore, the C(max) and AUC(0-24h) values for NPB LNG during NGM/EE treatment were estimated to be lower than during LNG/EE treatment. Since LNG is primarily bound by SHBG, its access to target tissues is restricted. Moreover, because SHBG does not bind NGMN, it appears to be quantitatively the more important NGM metabolite available to target tissues, and probably accounts for a substantial proportion of the progestogenic activity of NGM/EE OCs. However, it is also possible that simultaneous exposure of NGMN and LNG after treatment with NGM/EE may provide clinical benefits not seen with LNG/EE combinations.

Clinical comparative study of oral contraceptives containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg levonorgestrel, and 35 microg ethinylestradiol/250 microg norgestimate in Thai women

The study was conducted to compare cycle control, efficacy and side effects of two oral contraceptives containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol (EE)/150 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) and 35 microg ethinylestradiol (EE)/250 microg norgestimate (NGM). An open-label, randomized, comparative study was conducted in which 140 healthy women received the 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG or 35 microg EE/250 microg NGM preparation for six treatment cycles. There were no significant statistical differences between both groups in terms of cycle length and amount of withdrawal bleeding. The mean duration in the 35 microg EE/250 microg NGM group was longer than 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG group with significant statistical difference. More patients in 35 microg EE/250 microg NGM group experienced BTT at each cycle compared with the 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG group, but was not statistically significant. There was no amenorrhea nor pregnancies occurring in either group. No significant changes in body weight or blood pressure were found in both groups. The incidence of adverse events in both groups was low and tended to decrease with time. Statistically significant differences were observed for headache and dizziness, which occurred more in the 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG group. In conclusion, 35 microg EE/250 microg NGM provides reliable contraceptive efficacy. It also provides good cycle control equal to 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG with a lower incidence of minor adverse effects such as headache and dizziness compared to 30 microg EE/150 microg LNG.

Multicenter study of the efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a phasic desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a phasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol 35/30/30 microg and desogestrel 50/100/150 microg.

METHODS

A multicenter study was conducted involving 2070 healthy, fertile women, who received study treatment for six treatment cycles.

RESULTS

Most of the participants (79%) had previously been using an alternative oral contraceptive. In 10,408 treatment cycles, two women became pregnant while on treatment (Pearl index, 0.25). The incidence of irregular bleeding was 10% before treatment, rising to 27% at cycle 1, and decreasing to 11% by cycle 6. Irregular bleeding was mainly due to spotting rather than breakthrough bleeding and the incidence of breakthrough bleeding remained below 2.2% for most of the study period. Only 1.8% of women withdrew due to bleeding irregularities. First-time oral contraceptive users initially experienced more irregular bleeding than switchers but these differences lessened over time. The most common adverse events during treatment were headache, breast tenderness and nausea. The incidence of these adverse events fell to below pretreatment levels with continued use.

CONCLUSION

The phasic preparation was effective and well tolerated.

Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risks and benefits of third-generation oral contraceptives.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was done for English language articles published from 1985 through 1998 relating to the side-effect profile of third-generation oral contraceptives or their association with cardiovascular or thromboembolic disease. All articles containing original data were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The risk of venous thromboembolism appears to be 1.5- to 2.7-fold greater in users of third-generation, compared with second-generation, oral contraceptives. Compared with nonusers, women who use third-generation oral contraceptives may have a 4.8- to 9.4-fold greater risk of venous thromboembolism. Users of third-generation oral contraceptives do not appear to have an increased risk of myocardial infarction compared with nonusers and may have risk of myocardial infarction of 0.26 to 0.7 compared with second-generation users. Whether third-generation oral contraceptives are associated with a decreased stroke risk is still not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Although third-generation oral contraceptives most likely increase a user's risk of venous thromboembolism, their improved side-effect profile and their possible decreased association with myocardial infarction and stroke may make them a useful new class of oral contraceptives for most women except those at increased risk of venous thrombosis.

Clinical comparison of triphasic norgestimate/35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and monophasic norethindrone acetate/20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol. Cycle control, lipid effects, and user satisfaction

This six-cycle, multicenter, open-label, randomized study compared the clinical experience of two low-dose oral contraceptives (OC): a triphasic OC containing norgestimate (NGM) and 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) (Ortho Tri-Cyclen) and a monophasic OC containing norethindrone acetate (NETA) and 20 micrograms EE (Loestrin Fe 1/20). Cycle control, lipid and androgen profiles, and user satisfaction were studied in new-start OC users (i.e., no prior use within 60 days). Breakthrough bleeding or breakthrough spotting (BTB/BTS) occurred in a significantly smaller percentage of NGM/EE users than NETA/EE users during each of six cycles (p < or = 0.002). The incidence of BTB/BTS ranged from 3.7% to 13.5% for NGM/EE users and from 23.5% to 49.7% for NETA/EE users. Significantly fewer NGM/EE users than NETA/EE users experienced absence of menses at cycles 2 through 6 (p < or = 0.003). The percentages of women having no menses at each cycle ranged from 0.9% to 4.7% for NGM/EE users and from 10.3% to 21.3% for NETA/EE users. NGM/EE users reported a significantly (p < 0.001) higher level of satisfaction with their OC at the end of six cycles than did NETA/EE users, but there was no significant difference in compliance, discontinuation rates, or adverse events between the two groups. NGM/EE produced a significantly (p < or = 0.001) greater beneficial effect on HDL-C, HDL2, and apo A-I than did NETA/EE. No statistically significant treatment differences were found for total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides, or apo-B. Both OC increased sex hormone binding globulin and decreased free testosterone, but NGM/EE had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.009).

A comparative analysis of three methods of contraception: Effects on blood glucose and serum lipid profiles

BACKGROUND

Hormonal contraceptives are one of the major means of family planning, yet their use is not without side effects. In this study, we have tried to assess some of the metabolic effects of three hormonal contraceptives commonly used by young females.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred young, healthy, nonsmoking and normotensive women of childbearing age who were seeking contraceptive advice were randomly allocated to one of the three groups receiving ethinyl estradiol and norgestrel (group 1), medroxyprogesterone acetate (group 2), and levonorgestrel capsules (group 3). Levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), were measured prior to the initiation of therapy and after termination of the study (6 months).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the three groups as far as the mean age, height and weight were concerned. FBG increased in all three groups, but the difference in the rate of increase was not statistically significant (P=0.29). Total cholesterol, TG and LDL-C increased, while HDL-C level decreased in groups 1 and 2. These changes were, however, more profound in the group 2 cases. In those receiving levonorgestrel, all lipid parameters decreased. The amount of change for the total cholesterol and triglyceride was quite significant (P<0.001), while the reduction in HDL-C was not significantly different from the other two groups by pairwise comparisons (Tukey-HSD procedure). The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was found to be significantly increased in groups 1 and 2, but it remained almost unchanged in the group 3 cases (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Because of these favorable biochemical findings, we believe that levonorgestrel should be the contraceptive drug of choice for women of childbearing age who are seeking a safe method of contraception.

Contraception in diabetic women

Contraceptive prescription in diabetic women with current diabetic mellitus (type I or type II) or in prediabetic women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus must consider the specific metabolic effects and risks in diabetic women. This article addresses these issues, enabling the practitioner to develop individually tailored contraceptive programs to meet the changing needs and demands of the reproductive-aged diabetic woman. If focuses on the most efficacious, reversible option available--hormonal methods and intrauterine devices--both of which have been controversial for diabetic women.

The androgenicity of progestins

All steroid hormones are structurally similar, but relatively minor differences cause profound alterations in biochemical activity. The 21-carbon series (pregnane nucleus) includes the corticoids and the true progestins (e.g., medroxyprogesterone acetate). The 19-carbon series (androstane nucleus) includes all the androgens, among them the progestins used in most oral and parenteral contraceptives. The removal of carbon 19 from testosterone changes the major hormonal effect from androgenic to progestogenic, but these "19-nor" steroids retain varying degrees of androgenic activity. (They can also have limited estrogenic activity, but this is insignificant at the low doses used for contraception.) Some of the 19-nortestosterone progestins are metabolized to other compounds (e.g., norethynodrel, ethynodiol diacetate, and lynestrenol to norethindrone), and some (levonorgestrel, desogestrel) are active unchanged. The lingering androgenic effects of 19-nor progestins are dose-related, opposed by estrogen, and are manifested metabolically (e.g., glucose tolerance, lipoprotein synthesis) and symptomatically (e.g., acne, weight gain). The effect of 19-nortestosterones on lipoproteins prompted the development of less androgenic compounds, but the obvious benefit of the new progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) is a reduction in the symptoms associated with the androgenicity of the older compounds. Mitigation of androgenic effects on lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism could have long-term benefits, especially for women who are at risk of arteriosclerotic vascular disease; however, these effects remain to be epidemiologically demonstrated.

A practical approach to antibiotic treatment in women taking oral contraceptives

Clinical situations that require the use of systemic antibiotic therapy are common. Because millions of women choose oral contraceptives for birth control, the potential for interaction between these drugs frequently has to be considered. We review the available information and present a practical approach for dealing with this situation based on sharing responsibility with an educated patient.

Efficacy and safety of a monophasic and a triphasic oral contraceptive containing norgestimate

Both monophasic and triphasic formulations of ethinyl estradiol plus norgestimate, a progestin with marked progesterone-receptor affinity and minimal androgen-receptor affinity, have been evaluated in numerous clinical studies designed to determine if norgestimate's receptor-binding profile provides enhanced safety without a reduction in efficacy. To date clinical trials have shown that both formulations of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate offer contraceptive efficacy equivalent to that of other oral contraceptives. Monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate was associated with an incidence of breakthrough bleeding and spotting similar to that of monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel and an incidence of amenorrhea less than that of ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel. Cycle control with triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate was similar to that with monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate. Weight gain and elevated blood pressure were insignificant in clinical trials with both fixed-dose and phasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations. Perhaps of greatest importance, both monophasic and triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations consistently showed favorable impact on metabolic parameters, including elevations in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and reductions in the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio, the parameter considered most sensitive for atherosclerotic risk. Both monophasic and triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations were associated with minimal and clinically neutral effects on carbohydrate metabolism.

New progestogens in oral contraception

The major developments in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have been a reduction in the total dose of both the oestrogen and progestogen administered per cycle and the introduction of new progestogens which are claimed to be more 'selective' than the older ones. This review examines in detail the clinical efficacy of the new COCs, where possible in comparison with those containing levonorgestrel or norethisterone, and their pharmacological effect on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, haematological factors, pituitary-ovarian function and serum protein and androgen concentrations. Based mainly on the pharmacological evidence, the newer COCs are an improvement over the older low-dose formulations and are clearly preferable to the high-dose ones. However, the older low-dose COCs, despite many years of use, have not resulted in a high incidence of adverse effects. The increasing use of the new COCs, as evidenced by their increasing market share throughout Europe, does indicate that they have been well accepted in clinical practice.

Efficacy, cycle control and side-effects of two monophasic combination oral contraceptives: gestodene/ethinylestradiol and norgestimate/ethinylestradiol

Two monophasic oral contraceptives containing gestodene (GTD, 75 micrograms) and ethinylestradiol (EE, 30 micrograms) or norgestimate (NGS, 250 micrograms) and EE (35 micrograms) were compared during the first six cycles of use. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either type: 97 received GTD/EE and 92 NGS/EE. Six women in the GTD/EE group and nine in the NGS/EE group withdrew from the study; three (3%) and two (2%), respectively, withdrew because of adverse reactions. A total of 562 cycles for GTD/EE and 523 for NGS/EE were available. No woman became pregnant during the study. Overall, 94.4% of cycles in the GTD/EE group and 92.8% in the NGS/EE group were normal. A similar incidence of breakthrough bleeding (0.2% of cycles for GTD and 1.6% for NGS) and spotting (5.4% vs. 5.6%) was observed. Amenorrhea was never reported. Duration of withdrawal bleeding tended to be slightly longer in the NGS/EE group, significantly so for cycles 2 (0.5 days, p = 0.016), 4 (0.5 days, p = 0.031) and 5 (0.4 days, p = 0.045). Cycle 2 was significantly longer in the GTD/EE group (0.3 days, p = 0.027). Side-effects were reported by 12 (12%) women in the GTD/EE group and 13 (14%) in the NGS/EE group. The most common side-effects were headache (five cases (5%) in the GTD/EE group and two (2%) in the NGS/EE group) and breast pain (three (3%) and eight (9%) cases respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to change in body weight or changes in blood pressure and in laboratory data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)