Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations

Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 micrograms preparations are available. To address this issue, we conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 micrograms EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 micrograms EE) among 463 OC starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 micrograms EE as compared to 20 micrograms EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters; users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 micrograms EE users.

Benefits and risks of oral contraceptives

The major benefits of modern low-dose oral contraceptives include relative safety and a high degree of efficacy, decreasing the need for abortion or surgical sterilization; reduced risks of bacterial (but not viral) pelvic inflammatory disease and of endometrial and ovarian cancer; improved menstrual regularity, with less dysmenorrhea and blood flow; and, when low-dose combination (not progestogen-only) oral contraceptives are used, reduced acne and hirsutism. Major risks are cardiovascular. Preliminary data from nonrandomized studies suggest that oral contraceptives containing third-generation progestogens are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism, particularly in carriers of the coagulation factor V Leiden mutation. The risk of arterial thrombosis, such as myocardial infarction or stroke, may be directly related to estrogen dose, particularly in women who have hypertension, smoke, or are >35 years old. Considering that only users aged >/=30 years who smoke >/=25 cigarettes/d have a higher estimated mortality rate than that of pregnant women, the benefits of oral contraceptives appear to outweigh their risks.

Estimates of the risk of cardiovascular death attributable to low-dose oral contraceptives in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to estimate the annual risk of death in the United States from cardiovascular disease attributable to low-dose combination oral contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

Estimates of the risk of death from cardiovascular disease attributable to low-dose oral contraceptives were modeled on data from studies published through 1997 and from age-specific mortality rates in the United States for 1993 and 1994.

RESULTS

Attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease resulting from oral contraceptive use is 0.06 and 3.0 per 100,000 nonsmokers 15 to 34 years of age and 35 to 44 years of age, respectively. In smokers this risk increases, respectively, to 1.73 and 19.4 per 100,000 users in these 2 age groups; however, 97% and 85% of this risk is due to the combined effects of smoking and using oral contraceptives. The attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease in nonsmoking oral contraceptive users is lower than the risk of death from pregnancy in nonusers of oral contraceptives at all ages; however, among smoking oral contraceptive users more than 35 years of age, the excess risk of death from oral contraceptives is higher than the risk of death from pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

There is virtually no excess attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease related to oral contraceptive use in young women. However, smokers more than 35 years of age should use a nonestrogen contraceptive.

Efficacy and safety of the new antiandrogenic oral contraceptive Belara

The aim of this open, noncontrolled phase III study was the assessment of the contraceptive efficacy and the evaluation of the safety of long-term use of Belara (30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol plus 2 mg chlormadinone acetate). Furthermore, cycle stability during administration of Belara and the influence of Belara on acne and seborrhea as clinical signs of androgenization were observed. Belara was taken by 1655 women for a total of 22,337 cycles. For the theoretical Pearl index, a value of 0.269 (95% CI [0.109, 0.600]) was calculated. In 1655 of 22,337 cycles (7.4%), no withdrawal bleeding was documented, whereas in 2565 of 22,308 cycles (11.5%), spottings and, in 786 of 22,308 cycles (3.5%), breakthrough bleeding occurred. After the intake of Belara for 12 cycles, acne on the face/neck improved in 64.1% of the women (209 of 326). In 53.4% of the women (175 of 326), acne disappeared completely. Seborrhea improved after 12 cycles in 89 of 131 women (67.9%), of whom 76 women (58.0%) were completely cured. Sixty-two serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 59 of 1655 women. Accidents and injuries of the musculoskeletal system were the SAE with the highest incidence (0.66%). Two cases of deep venous thrombosis, one pulmonary embolism, and two cases of visual disturbances were observed. Only for the two cases of deep venous thrombosis could a relation to Belara be assumed. Of the adverse events commonly reported for oral contraceptives, headache was observed for the first time under study medication in 37.4%, nausea in 23.1%, breast tenderness in 21.7%, and vaginal discharge in 19.4% of the women. The frequency of adverse events decreased with longer duration of a drug consisting of intake of Belara. In conclusion, Belara can be described as an effective and safe oral contraceptive with marked antiandrogenic properties.

A multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over six treatment cycles

The aim of the trial was to demonstrate the contraceptive efficacy of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel and to observe cycle control and safety. Data from 805 treated women resulted in 4400 treatment cycles. One pregnancy occurred while on the trial medication as a result of method failure, resulting in a Pearl index of 0.29. Cycle control was good, and cycle length as well as duration and intensity of withdrawal bleeding were not significantly changed during the trial. Intermenstrual bleeding usually occurred as spotting and decreased considerably during the treatment phase. Spotting alone was reported in 12.4% of cycles, breakthrough bleeding alone in 4.5% of cycles, and breakthrough bleeding and spotting together in 1.4% of treatment cycles. The rate of absence of withdrawal bleeding declined throughout the trial to 2.4% in cycle 6. There were no serious adverse events related to treatment, and most adverse events were those commonly observed in clinical trials with oral contraceptives. Headache, breast tension, and nausea were reported by 17.3%, 11.0%, and 7.7% of the women, respectively. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters, blood pressure, or weight. In this trial, the new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel was shown to be effective, safe, and well tolerated. Cycle control was found to be good and there was a low incidence of adverse events.

Use of low-dose oral contraceptives and stroke in young women

BACKGROUND

Low-dose oral contraceptives are widely used, but there are limited data on the cerebrovascular risks associated with these medications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether use of low-dose oral contraceptives influences the risk for stroke.

DESIGN

Population-based case-control study.

SETTING

Women 18-44 years of age who resided in western Washington State between 1991 and 1995.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with ischemic stroke (n = 60), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 102), and other types of stroke (n = 11) and controls identified through random-digit dialing (n = 485).

MEASUREMENTS

Details about oral contraceptive use and other risk factors for stroke were obtained through in-person interviews.

RESULTS

The estimated incidences of hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke were 6.4 and 4.3 per 100,000 women-years, respectively. Compared with women who had never used oral contraceptives (after adjustment for risk factors for stroke), current users of low-dose oral contraceptives had estimated odds ratios of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.37 to 2.31) for hemorrhagic stroke and 0.89 (CI, 0.27 to 2.94) for ischemic stroke. Compared with past users of oral contraceptives, current users had odds ratios of 1.41 (CI, 0.67 to 2.96) for hemorrhagic stroke and 1.37 (CI, 0.49 to 3.81) for ischemic stroke. For past users compared with never users, the odds ratios were 0.59 (CI, 0.30 to 1.18) for hemorrhagic stroke and 0.57 (CI, 0.25 to 1.32) for ischemic stroke. The odds ratio for hemorrhagic stroke in current users of low-dose oral contraceptives containing norgestrel or levonorgestrel was elevated (3.23 [CI, 1.24 to 8.41]). Among patients with hemorrhagic stroke, the odds ratio for aneurysmal bleeding associated with current use of low-dose oral contraceptives containing norgestrel or levonorgestrel was 4.46 (CI, 1.58 to 12.53).

CONCLUSION

The overall risk for stroke and type of stroke was not increased among current users of low-dose oral contraceptives in the study population. Larger studies are needed to clarify both the relation of risk for stroke to past use of oral contraceptives and the possible association between current use of norgestrel-containing oral contraceptives and hemorrhagic stroke.

First-time use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism

Recent epidemiologic studies reported that the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with the use of the newer third generation oral contraceptives than with second generation agents. Although the overall findings of these studies are similar, the results, as they relate to patterns and duration of oral contraceptive use particularly among first-time users, are inconsistent. We reanalyzed data from the Transnational case-control study to assess the risk of VTE associated with first-time use of oral contraceptives as a function of its duration of use. Over the period 1993 to 1995, 471 cases of venous thromboembolism were identified in Germany and the United Kingdom. For each case, up to four controls were obtained, for a total of 1772 controls. Data on oral contraceptive use and confounding variables, including data on sociodemographic, lifestyle, medical history, and family history of disease, were obtained by interview. Data analysis was based on the 105 cases and 422 controls who were first-time users of second or third generation agents, or never users of oral contraception. Rate ratios, adjusted for confounders and approximated by odds ratios, were estimated as a continuous function of duration of oral contraceptive use by logistic regression and quadratic spline models. We found, for first-time users, that the adjusted rate ratio of VTE as a function of the duration of oral contraceptive use is essentially identical for second and third generation pills relative to never users. This rate ratio increases to around 10 in the first year of use and decreases to around two after 2 years of use, remaining at this risk level thereafter for both second and third generation agents. We conclude that second and third generation agents are associated with identical risks of venous thromboembolism when they are prescribed to women who are using oral contraceptives for the first time ever.

Effect of vitamin B6 on the side effects of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive

Analogous to recommendations for treatment of side effects of early pregnancy and premenstrual syndrome, use of vitamin B6 has been recommended for the treatment of side effects of oral contraceptive (OC) use. A randomized, triple-blinded controlled trial of 124 women was done to evaluate the effect of taking 150 mg of vitamin B6 daily for 30 days on the severity of nausea, headache, vomiting, dizziness, depression, and irritability associated with the initiation of low-dose (30 micrograms norgestrel and 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol) OG use. The severity of the symptoms was measured on a scale from 0 to 3 (not present to severe), and was evaluated at one month after admission. The two treatment groups (vitamin B, and placebo) had comparable baseline characteristics. From admission to follow up, there was a decrease in the severity of all symptoms in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the reductions found in the vitamin B6 and the placebo groups, although reductions in the severity of headache and dizziness were greater in the B6 group. The decrease in the severity of all OC side effects can be explained more by a placebo effect than by a marginal pharmacological effect of the vitamin B6.

Resistance to activated protein C, associated with oral contraceptives use; effect of formulations, duration of assumption, and doses of oestro-progestins

Resistance to activated protein C (APC-R) is at present considered the most frequent laboratory abnormality in patients with deep vein thrombosis. An increased risk for venous thrombosis is associated with the use of oral contraceptives (OCs). We recently described a statistically significant association between APC-R status and oral contraceptives use in a healthy group of women. We re-evaluated 50 healthy women taking low-dose combination OCs in order to consider a possible correlation between the APC sensitivity ratio (APC-SR) and different oral contraceptive formulations. Seven women showed an APC ratio < or = 2 (APC-resistant). Only one of the seven women was found to be heterozygous for Leiden factor V mutation. We observed no significant differences between normally sensitive and APC-resistant women in terms of duration of OC use, amount of estrogenic or progestogenic dose, or type of formulation. We conclude that APC-resistance associated with oral contraceptives use seems to occur only in predisposed subjects (in our results, about 12% of the healthy population).

Evaluating oral contraceptive use at 6 and 12 months

OBJECTIVE

To determine if oral contraceptive use necessitates more than a yearly visit.

STUDY DESIGN

Outpatient files of all patients in a gynecologic clinic were evaluated. Patients who were started on oral contraceptives were identified. The findings on their return visits at 6 months and 12 months were compared for any significant differences.

RESULTS

There was no increased incidence of elevation in blood pressure noted at the 6-month visit when compared to the 12-month visit. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of abnormal findings on breast and pelvic examinations at the 6-month visit as compared to the 12-month visit.

CONCLUSION

Annual evaluations for patients on low-dose oral contraceptives are adequate. The patients who attended this clinic were working-class, middle-aged women, and as such the data from this study may not be applicable to the population at large.

[Contraceptive use in women with heart disease]

PURPOSE

To analyse efficacy, tolerance and adverse events of reversible contraceptives in women with cardiac disease.

METHODS

We studied prospectively during 24-39 (mean = 29) months, 89 women with heart disease with a mean age of 25.6 (16-42) years. Rheumatic heart disease was present in 73 (82%) cases, congenital heart disease in 11 (11%), coronary artery disease in 2 (2%) and cardiomyopathy in 3 (3%) case. The patients were divided in three groups: GCO--35 patients taking combined oral contraceptives (30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene--COs); GIT--27 using injectable progestagens (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate-DMPA) and GUID--27 with intrauterine device (IUD).

RESULTS

In GCO occurred 4 (11.4%) cases of arterial hypertension, 1 (2.8%) of a transient cerebral isquemic attack, 3 (8.5%) of spotting, 1 (2.8%) of amnorrhea e 1 (2.8%) pregnancy. Interruption of this method occurred in 4 (11.4%) cases due to hypertension (2), pregnancy (1) and amenorrhea (1). In group GIT there were 2 (7.4%) cases of arterial hypertension, 18 (66.6%) of amenorrhea, and 3 (11.1%) of spotting. Interruption of use occurred in 5 (18.5%) due to amnorrhea (2), weight gain (2) and headache (1). In GUID there was 1 (3.7%) case of infeccion, 1 (3.7%) pregnancy and 1 (3.7%) spontaneous expulsion of IUD. Interruption of use took place in 3 (11.1%) cases due to infeccion, pregnancy and expulsion. The comparation between the groups demonstrated a difference in the incidence of amenorrhea (p < 0.005) and descontinuation of use of the method (p < 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Use of reversible contraceptives in heart disease women was associated with an acceptable cardiovascular risk. Efficacy and side effects of the methods were comparable in the groups, however intolerance was more observed in GIT.

Effect of low-dose oral triphasic contraceptives on blood viscosity, coagulation and lipid metabolism

The purpose of the study was to determine the relationship between hemorheological profile, i.e. blood viscosity, and other risk factors for cardiovascular and thrombotic diseases in women taking oral contraceptives and if blood viscosity may be considered a marker of cardiovascular risk in OC users. Plasma levels of coagulation parameters, serum lipids, blood viscosity and RBC deformability were determined in a group of 10 women taking OC vs. 10 controls. The blood parameters were evaluated before OC use and thereafter at 3 and 6 months. A significant change in the partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, HDL and apolipoprotein A-I was observed, while the other parameters remained unchanged. Plasma viscosity was significantly increased during OC treatment; whole blood viscosity and RBC deformability remained unchanged. However, although some parameters were significantly modified during OC treatment, all alterations remained within the normal range of laboratory values. The data confirm that low-dose triphasic OC therapy does not affect significantly the coagulation system, serum lipid metabolism and blood viscosity. Plasma viscosity measurement may be considered as a marker for monitoring women using OC because it is apparently the most sensitive parameter.

[Clinical effectiveness of Marvelon]

Clinical results of a new contraceptive pills--Marvelon (Organon) were studied. 32 women, ages 30 +/- 5 years, participated in the study during at least 6 cycles. Marvelon was good tolerated and subjective side-effects were very low. The cycles were regular, duration of withdrawal bleeding was 3-5 days and the amount of the blood lost were unchanged or milder. Marvelon didn't affect body weight and blood pressure. Favourable lipid profile--increased a mean level of HDL-Cholesterol and decreased a mean level of LDL-Cholesterol were noticed. Pearl Index was 0,0.

Effect of oestrogen dose on whole blood platelet activation in women taking new low dose oral contraceptives

Oral contraceptive use is known to cause changes in the haemostatic system. These changes are thought to be related to oestrogen dose and to provide a possible link between the increased risk of thromboembolic disease known to occur in women taking oestrogen containing oral contraceptives. This study measured whole blood platelet activation, serially, in women taking oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms and 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combined with desogestrel. Increased levels of ADP and arachidonic acid induced aggregation were observed in women taking the 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination. Platelet release of beta-thromboglobulin (beta TG) was also significantly increased. Increased collagen induced aggregation was observed but this failed to reach statistical significance for the individual treatment groups. In women taking the 20 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination, a significant increase was only observed when platelets were stimulated with arachidonic acid. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) levels were unchanged in both groups. Significantly higher levels of beta TG were observed in women taking the 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination compared with women taking the 20 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination. These results show that oral contraceptive use is associated with platelet activation. Women taking the 20 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination show less changes in platelet activation than women taking the 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol combination. This lower dose pill may therefore be particularly suitable for high risk women wishing to use oral contraception.

Efficacy and safety of a monophasic and a triphasic oral contraceptive containing norgestimate

Both monophasic and triphasic formulations of ethinyl estradiol plus norgestimate, a progestin with marked progesterone-receptor affinity and minimal androgen-receptor affinity, have been evaluated in numerous clinical studies designed to determine if norgestimate's receptor-binding profile provides enhanced safety without a reduction in efficacy. To date clinical trials have shown that both formulations of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate offer contraceptive efficacy equivalent to that of other oral contraceptives. Monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate was associated with an incidence of breakthrough bleeding and spotting similar to that of monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel and an incidence of amenorrhea less than that of ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel. Cycle control with triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate was similar to that with monophasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate. Weight gain and elevated blood pressure were insignificant in clinical trials with both fixed-dose and phasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations. Perhaps of greatest importance, both monophasic and triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations consistently showed favorable impact on metabolic parameters, including elevations in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and reductions in the low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein ratio, the parameter considered most sensitive for atherosclerotic risk. Both monophasic and triphasic ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate formulations were associated with minimal and clinically neutral effects on carbohydrate metabolism.

Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age

A comparative study of two low-dose oral contraceptives, gestodene (GES) 75 mcg/ethinyl oestradiol (EE) 30 mcg and desogestrel (DES) 150 mcg/EE 20 mcg, was conducted in women over 30 years of age. This randomised, open-label study was organised in Denmark, Italy, New Zealand and United Kingdom. A total of 505 women received GES/EE and 501 received DES/EE for 6 consecutive menstrual cycles. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic and gynaecologic characteristics at baseline. However, the menstrual flow length was slightly longer in the GES/EE group before the start of the treatment. The mean age (+/- SD) was 35 +/- 4 years in the GES/EE group and 35 +/- 5 years in the DES/EE group. The subjects in the GES/EE group contributed data for a total of 2800 cycles and those in the DES/EE group, data for 2796 cycles. There were no pregnancies on medication with either preparation. The results showed that there were significantly more normal cycles in the GES/EE group for cycles 1 to 6. Irregular bleeding between withdrawal bleeds occurred in 10% of GES/EE and 18.5% of DES/EE cycles. Absence of all bleeding was reported in 29 (1%) and 63 (2%) cycles, respectively. The incidence of missed pills was low in both groups (11% of cycles). No significant differences were observed in cycle length or withdrawal bleeding episode length. Withdrawal bleeding mean intensity was statistically significantly greater with GES/EE. However, for both preparations, the mean intensity was close to light bleeding. No clinically significant differences were noted in weight, blood pressure, Papanicolaou smears or laboratory data. Sixty-eight (13.5%) subjects in the GES/EE group and 64 (12.8%) in the DES/EE group discontinued before the end of the study. Among them, 37 (7%) and 40 (8%) in the respective groups withdrew because of adverse reactions. There was no difference between groups in terms of primary reasons for withdrawal. The most frequently reported complaints that led to discontinuation in both groups were headache, nausea and metrorrhagia. Breast tenderness led to the discontinuation of 1 subject in the GES/EE group and 3 in the DES/EE group. These results show excellent cycle control, efficacy and very low rate of side effects with both GES/EE and DES/EE. These low-dose oral contraceptives could be well suited to healthy nonsmoking women requiring contraception up to the age of menopause.

Effects of a low-estrogen, desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism

Fasting serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins, and fasting plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide were measured in 107 non-users and 83 users of an oral contraceptive containing the progestin desogestrel, combined with 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol. Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were measured in a subgroup of 69 non-users and 39 users. Compared with non-users, users had higher concentrations of total, high density lipoprotein (HDL), HDL subfraction 3 and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, total triglycerides, VLDL triglycerides, apolipoproteins AI and AII and fasting plasma insulin. There were no differences in HDL subfraction 2, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. OGTT glucose was 60% higher in the users and OGTT insulin response 19% higher. The OGTT C-peptide response did not differ. The effects of 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 micrograms desogestrel on lipid, lipoprotein, glucose and insulin metabolism are similar to those described previously with a 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol combination containing the same dose of desogestrel. The relatively favourable metabolic profile associated with the higher estrogen dose desogestrel combination is maintained at the lower dose.

Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol

OBJECTIVE

To compare two oral contraceptive pills, both containing 150 micrograms desogestrel, but with either 20 micrograms (Mercilon) or 30 micrograms (Marvelon/Desolett) ethinyl oestradiol (EE), regarding reliability, cycle control and side effect profile.

DESIGN

A double blind, randomised, multicentre study over one year with follow up after three, six and 12 months. The women noted tablet intake and all bleedings on specifically designed diary cards.

SETTING

University clinics, central hospitals and private gynaecological practices in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

SUBJECTS

One thousand women aged 18 to 40 years requesting oral contraceptive pills.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reliability, cycle control, side effects, blood pressure, body weight and haemoglobin.

RESULTS

In a total of 4543 cycles with the 20 micrograms EE dose pill and 4688 cycles with the 30 micrograms EE dose pill, the number of pregnancies ascribed to method failure were 0 and 2, respectively. Irregular bleeding (break-through bleeding or spotting) was significantly more frequent with the 150/20 combination in about two-thirds of the cycles randomly distributed over the one year of the study. Mean blood pressure decreased slightly, particularly in the group on the 150/20 combination (about 1 mmHg), whereas mean body weight increased approximately 0.5 kg in the group with the 150/30 combination after 12 months. Haemoglobin did not change. Side effects other than bleeding problems were rare, but dizziness and mood changes were more frequent in the group on the 150/20 combination. Due to side effects, more women on the 150/20 combination discontinued the study during the one to three and four to six month periods, and women on this pill were also less positive about continuing the study drug at the end of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Both pills have high contraceptive reliability and are well tolerated, but with the 150/20 combination the cycle control is less effective. However, in view of the potentially increased safety profile of the 150/20 combination, many women can be expected to accept some additional discomfort due to irregular bleeding.

Long-interval treatment regimen with a desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive

A randomized multicenter study was performed in order to investigate the acceptance of a low-dose OC (30 micrograms of ethinyloestradiol and 150 micrograms of desogestrel), using a 9 weeks on and 1 week off schedule (prolonged regimen, n = 198), compared to a traditional 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule (standard regimen, n = 96). Haemoglobin and blood pressure remained the same in both groups during the study. No significant differences were found in body weight changes between the two groups. There was significantly more breakthrough bleeding and spotting in the group with prolonged regimen than in the group with standard regimen, but both breakthrough bleeding and spotting decreased during the trial. Irregular bleeding was significantly less in women who were already using OC, compared to "new starters." No serious side effects occurred. Significantly more women stopped the trial because of bleeding problems in the group with prolonged regimen, while there were significantly more women who stopped the trial because of headache in the group with standard regimen. After completing 12 months, or after premature withdrawal from the study, each women completed a questionnaire. Sixty-three per cent of the women preferred the studied alternative and twenty-six per cent preferred the traditional OC.

Liver damage from low-dose oral contraceptives

OBJECTIVE

To study whether the decrease in the content of oestrogen and gestagen in modern low-dose oral contraceptives (OC) has yielded a lower incidence of adverse liver reactions, and to describe the biochemical pattern of the adverse liver reactions from low-dose OC.

DESIGN

We surveyed all liver reactions from OC reported to SADRAC (Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee) from 1966 to 1989.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incidence of reported adverse liver reactions (number of reported adverse reactions/OC sales in defined daily dose [DDD]).

RESULTS

There was a sharp decline in the number of reports during the studied period, suggesting changes in reporting habits. However, there was also a significantly lower incidence of reports for medium-compared to high-oestrogen dose OC, and a further decrease, albeit non-significant, in incidence with low-oestrogen dose OC. Furthermore, in three comparisons of pairs of OC that differed only in the gestagen dose, there was a strong trend towards a higher reporting rate with higher gestagen dose. Cholestatic and hepatocellular liver enzyme patterns were equally frequent in patients with adverse reactions from low-dose oestrogen OC. There was no report of liver tumours related to use of low-oestrogen dose OC.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be a decrease in the incidence of adverse liver reactions related to lower contents of both oestrogen and gestagens in OC of the combined-preparation type.

Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian activity under oral contraceptives

The trend towards changing the composition of the contraceptive pill in order to decrease side effects might lead to increased ovarian activity. This may decrease reliability. Therefore, a non-invasive method for monitoring the suppressive effect of the pill on ovarian function is warranted. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether or not diagnostic ultrasound might be the method of choice for studying residual ovarian activity during pill use. In 89 women on a low-dose oral contraceptive (30 mcg ethinyl-estradiol (EE)/75 mcg gestodene), the first two months of pill-intake were monitored extensively with diagnostic ultrasound. The study revealed that only one ultrasound investigation was needed during the first week of pill intake to discover all relevant cases of residual ovarian activity. Follow-up investigations are needed to quantify this activity more specifically.

A randomized trial of three oral contraceptives: comparison of bleeding patterns by contraceptive types and steroid levels

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the relationship between bioavailability of contraceptive steroids and bleeding patterns.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial evaluated 192 women on 50 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol and 1.0 mg of norethindrone (OC1), 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 1.0 mg of norethindrone (OC2), and 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 0.5 mg norethindrone (OC3) over nine cycles.

RESULTS

Intermenstrual bleeding rates were higher for OC3 when compared with OC1 (p = 0.01). The number of intermenstrual bleeding days was highest for OC3 (p = 0.001) and higher for OC2 when compared with OC1 (p < 0.006). The onset of withdrawal bleeding occurred faster in OC3 patients (p < 0.02). Bioavailability of both contraceptive steroids as measured by baseline values and 1-hour slopes did not correlate with bleeding patterns at 3, 6, and 9 months of use.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that differences in biologic responses associated with pill use cannot be explained solely on the basis of these particular hormone measurements.

Fasting plasma lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in Nigerian women using combined oral and progestin-only injectable contraceptives

Fasting plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (apo) profiles were determined in Nigerian women using a low-dose combined oral (Lo-Feminal + Fe) (n = 18), a progestin-only injectable (Depo-Provera) (n = 16) contraceptives and matched controls (n = 18). The mean of plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apo B and Lp(a) were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in women using contraceptives than the controls. The mean of total and LDL-cholesterol and apo B were also significantly higher in the oral contraceptive users than those on progestin-only injectables. Furthermore, the mean of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk indices, total/HDL-cholesterol (p < 0.05) and LDL/HDL-cholesterol (p < 0.01), were significantly higher in women on oral contraceptives than the controls. There were no statistically significant differences between the indices in the women using progestin-only injectables and the controls. Based on this finding, it is concluded that the use of steroidal contraceptives is associated with alterations of lipid and apolipoprotein profiles in Nigerian women and that the use of low-dose combined oral contraceptives may be associated with an increased CVD risk.

Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of cerebral thromboembolism in women using low dose oral contraceptives.

DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

All Danish medical, neurological, neurosurgical, and gynaecological departments.

SUBJECTS

All 794 women in Denmark aged 15-44 who had suffered a cerebral thromboembolic attack during 1985-9 and 1588 age matched randomly selected controls.

RESULTS

Of 692/1584 case/control questionnaires sent out, 590/1396 (85.3%/88.1%) were returned. Among the cases, 15 refused to participate, 69 had a revised or unreliable diagnosis, 40 had had thromboembolic disease previously, 13 were pregnant, and 152 had a disease predisposing to a cerebral thromboembolic attack. Of the 323 cases without a known predisposition, 320 reported use or non-use of oral contraception. Among the 1396 controls, eight refused to participate, were mentally retarded, or lived abroad; 18 returned an uncompleted questionnaire; 17 had had thromboembolic disease previously; 31 were pregnant; and 130 had a disease predisposing to a cerebral thromboembolic attack. Thus 1198 non-predisposed controls were available, among whom 1197 reported use or non-use of oral contraception. Among the 320 cases, 116 (36.3%) were oral contraceptive users at the time of the cerebral thromboembolic attack. By comparison there were 191 users (16.0%) among the 1197 controls, giving a crude odds ratio of 3.0. After multivariate analysis, including confounder control for age, smoking, years of schooling, and trend in use of different types of oral contraceptives during 1985-90, pills containing 50 micrograms oestrogen were associated with an odds ratio for cerebral thromboembolic attack of 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 5.4), those containing 30-40 micrograms oestrogen an odds ratio of 1.8 (1.1 to 2.9), those containing progestogen only an odds ratio of 0.9 (0.4 to 2.4). The odds ratio did not change with increasing age or with duration of oral contraceptive use. A 50% increased risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attacks among cigarette smokers (after confounder control) was independent of oral contraception status and age.

CONCLUSION

Low dose oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of cerebral thromboembolic attack. Combined or sequential pills containing 30-40 micrograms oestrogen are associated with a one third reduced risk compared with preparations containing 50 micrograms oestrogen. Progestogen only pills did not increase the risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack.

Combined oral contraceptives: risks and benefits

By the age of 25 years, more than 95% of sexually active women have been exposed to combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Any effects associated with their use, therefore, carry important public health implications. COCs exert major protective effects against ovarian and endometrial cancer, which continue many years after cessation of use. COCs increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but this risk is probably confined to current users. It is unclear whether lower dose preparations carry less risk. The precise relationship between COC use and risk of breast and cervical cancer is uncertain, although it is clear that COCs do not influence the overall risk of breast cancer. The risk-benefit equation for COC use depends crucially on assumptions about the true breast cancer risk. If there is no increased risk then COCs have a net beneficial effect on mortality, mainly due to the saving in ovarian cancer deaths. However, with more pessimistic assumptions about breast cancer, COCs have an adverse effect. The risk-benefit equation will vary for individual women. Most research has related to the developed world and extrapolation of findings to developing countries is inappropriate.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the impact of low-dose and triphasic oral contraceptives on follicular development

OBJECTIVE

This investigation tests the hypothesis that triphasic oral contraceptives are associated with the development of large, persistent ovarian cysts.

STUDY DESIGN

Weekly vaginal ultrasonography was used in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study that compared the incidence, risk, size, and time to resolution of ovarian follicles in healthy women who took Estrostep or Loestrin oral contraceptives (manufactured by Parke-Davis) or a placebo during three consecutive menstrual cycles.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent of placebo-treated subjects developed follicles greater than 18 mm, compared with 39% and 23% in the Estrostep and Loestrin groups. The risks for each group of developing a large follicle during a single cycle were not different. No dominant follicle persisted for greater than 2 weeks for any subject.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that follicular development continues during treatment with oral contraceptives. In addition, the findings fail to support the hypothesis that triphasic oral contraceptives result in persistent ovarian cysts.

A cross-over study of three oral contraceptives containing ethinyloestradiol and either desogestrel or levonorgestrel

A randomised cross-over trial was performed to compare the pharmacodynamic actions of three low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs): Marvelon (150 micrograms desogestrel (DSG)+ 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol (EE)), Mercilon (150 micrograms DSG + 20 micrograms EE) and Microgynon (150 micrograms levonorgestrel (LNG) + 30 micrograms EE). None of the OCs produced any significant changes in serum cholesterol, LDL-C and apoprotein B. Triglycerides were increased by the desogestrel OCs but not by Microgynon. The latter however increased the glucose and insulin responses to a glucose tolerance test whereas Marvelon and Mercilon had no effect. HDL-C increased with Marvelon, was unchanged with Mercilon and was decreased with Microgynon. Apoprotein AII was increased by all three OCs but only the DSG OCs increased apoprotein AI. All OCs produced similar increases in caeruloplasmin but the increase in SHBG was much greater with Marvelon and Mercilon than with Microgynon. Testosterone was reduced more with Microgynon than with the DSG OCs. Many of the changes reflect the strong anti-oestrogenic action of LNG on metabolic parameters compared to DSG. Except for the effect on HDL-C, there was little difference between Marvelon and Mercilon on metabolic parameters and this complements the findings from large-scale clinical trials of the two OCs. Mercilon, therefore provides a very satisfactory alternative to Marvelon.

Increased capillary permeability for plasma proteins in oral contraceptive users

The transcapillary fluid balance was examined in eleven women before administration of a monophasic oral contraceptive (desogestrel 0.15 mg, ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg), and after three and six months of use. The interstitial colloid osmotic pressure was measured by the "wick" method, and the interstitial hydrostatic pressure by the "wick-in-needle" method in subcutaneous tissue on thorax and leg. During the six-month observation period, the following changes were observed: Plasma colloid osmotic pressure decreased (mean 1.8 mmHg, p = 0.047), as well as serum albumin (mean 5.1 g/l, p = 0.0006), total protein concentration (mean 2.8 g/l, p = 0.0006), hemoglobin (mean 0.5 g/dl, p = 0.014) and hematocrit (mean 1.8%, p = 0.047). Blood pressure and body weight remained unchanged, but foot volume showed a significant increase. The colloid osmotic pressure gradient (plasma-interstitium) was significantly reduced. The results indicate an increase in plasma volume in addition to an increased capillary permeability to plasma proteins during oral contraceptive use. We suggest that the observed changes in transcapillary fluid balance is caused by the estrogen component of the oral contraceptive pill.

Contraceptive compliance with a levonorgestrel triphasic and a norethindrone monophasic oral contraceptive in adolescent patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to assess the impact of two low-dose oral contraceptive pills on compliance and side effects in adolescent patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The use of a levonorgestrel-containing triphasic pill (N = 114) was compared with that of a monophasic (1 + 35) norethindrone-containing pill (N = 110) at two different sociodemographic sites.

RESULTS

No significant difference in compliance or pill satisfaction was observed between the pills. Socioeconomic factors were the overriding predictors of compliance. At 3 and 12 months of follow-up, there were significantly fewer complaints of overall side effects (p less than 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively), breakthrough bleeding (p = 0.017 and p = 0.018), and pill amenorrhea (p = 0.002 and p less than 0.001) among users of the triphasic pill. Mean weight change at 12 months was +1.1 kg for the monophasic pill and -0.1 kg for the triphasic pill. All known pregnancies occurred among noncompliant city clinic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents experienced fewer side effects with the triphasic pill than with the monophasic one, but compliance was the same.

Oral contraceptive type and functional ovarian cysts

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that multiphasic, low-dose monophasic, and high-dose monophasic oral contraceptives share a common protective effect against functional ovarian cysts.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cohort study using the automatic files of Maine Medicaid to assemble a population of 7462 women between the ages of 15 and 44 who were prescribed an oral contraceptive between Jan. 1, 1987, and Dec. 31, 1988. We included as cases 32 women with a principal diagnosis of a functional ovarian cyst confirmed by medical records as being greater than 20 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

At comparison with the absence of an oral contraceptive prescription, we observed decreasing rates of functional ovarian cysts among women prescribed multiphasic pills (rate ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.3000 to 2.31), low-dose monophasic pills with less than or equal to 35 micrograms estrogen (rate ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 1.33), and high-dose monophasic pills with greater than 35 micrograms estrogen (rate ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effect of oral contraceptives against functional ovarian cysts reported previously for high-dose monophasic pills may be attenuated with newer pills of lower hormonal potency.

Clinical evaluation of a new triphasic oral contraceptive: norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol

The safety and efficacy of the triphasic oral contraceptive agent containing norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol were evaluated in a 12-month study of 661 women. Excellent contraceptive efficacy was achieved, with two pregnancies ascribed to product failure in a total of 6,511 treatment cycles. The life-table predicted pregnancy rate was 0.57 per 100 woman-years of use. The overall and theoretical Pearl indexes were 0.55 and 0.37, respectively. Good cycle control was maintained in patterns similar to those noted in previous studies. The incidence of dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome was sharply reduced. Side effects reported were typical of those associated with use of low-dose oral contraceptive agents. Acceptability was high compared with agents used previously by the subjects. Total cholesterol did not change but high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly elevated at 3 and 12 months. There were no clinically significant changes in the parameters of hematology or blood chemistry tested.

[The effect of oral ovulation inhibiting (mono-, bi- and triphase) contraceptives and of Continuin and Postinor on proteo- and steroid hormones]

Endocrinological changes due to the effect of treatment with mono-, bi- and three-phase contraceptive pills taking continuously and occasionally are reviewed. It is established that oral contraceptives based on ovulation inhibition are safe. Less side effects are produced by Ovidon tablets. Continuin and Postinor pills are not safe, and they can produce irregular bleeding. Beside their numerous advances extrauterine pregnancy frequently happens (6.4%). A three-phase preparation is expected to have a reversible effect and lack of a consequent functional infertility. This is improved by hormone level measurements.

The effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on lipids and lipoproteins in two at-risk populations: young female smokers and older premenopausal women

Young women who smoke and women over age 35 are considered to be at high risk for cardiovascular complications associated with oral contraceptive use. This study evaluated the effects of low-dose oral contraceptives on lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in 45 high-risk patients before, during, and after 6 months of treatment. Neither group showed a significant change from baseline in cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or cholesterol ratios. Triglycerides increased and HDL2a levels decreased significantly in both groups but returned to baseline after treatment was discontinued, with the largest changes in both triglycerides and HDL2a levels occurring at 1 month. The change in triglyceride and HDL2a blood levels were within the laboratories' reference range. The lipid profile of these patients, therefore, was not worsened significantly through 6 months of oral contraceptive use. The young women who smoked did have consistently lowered levels of HDL cholesterol and its HDL2a subfraction when compared to their elder non-smoking cohort.

Combined progestin and estrogen (oral), and other forms of hormonal contraception

This review examines controversies concerning serious side effects of oral contraceptives. Current concerns about the pill are with either relatively small excess risks or with very long-term effects, which need not be small. The main outstanding questions are the effects on cardiovascular disease of lowering doses and the effects on breast cancer of oral contraceptive use at a young age. In the end, the possible effects on breast cancer incidence cause the most concern. It is argued that most epidemiologic studies are too small to reliably detect effects among particular subgroups and it is possibly too soon to know what the long-term effects of using oral contraceptives while young on breast cancer actually are. However, complacency is contraindicated.

Low estrogen oral contraceptives and the hypothalamo-pituitary axis

The hypothalamo-pituitary axis in a group of 10 women (17-25 years of age) taking low-dose-estrogen oral contraceptives (20 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE) + 150 micrograms desogestrel) for at least 6 months was investigated. The subjects underwent the GnRH (50 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) stimulation tests for the evaluation of LH, FSH, Pr1, TSH and GH secretion. In the basal blood sample, E2, P, free T, A and SHBG levels were also determined. An elevation in LH response to GnRH was found, whereas FSH was inhibited. After TRH administration, the Pr1 response was the same in the oral contraceptive cycle as in the pretreatment cycle. Similar results were observed after TSH. Significantly, GH responded to TRH stimulation in the oral contraceptive cycles, but not in the pretreatment cycles. These results show that the new combination of 20 micrograms EE and desogestrel blocks hypothalamic production of GnRH. The different response to GnRH of LH and FSH reveals a differentiated sensitivity to the oral contraceptive which seems to inhibit the pituitary FSH-secreting gonadotrope cells in particular.

Effects of low and high dose oral contraceptives on blood coagulation and thrombogenesis induced by vascular subendothelium exposed to flowing human blood

We investigated the effect of oral contraceptives with low and high estrogen concentration on blood coagulation and thrombogenesis, induced by vascular subendothelium of rabbit aorta exposed to flowing human blood. Twenty healthy women intending to take oral contraceptives were studied [1] before drug ingestion (control), and subsequently during the intake of oral contraceptives with [2] low estrogen content (20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel per day) and [3] high estrogen content (50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 125 micrograms desogestrel per day). All experiments were performed between day 17 and 21 of the menstrual cycle and drug effects were studied during the third tablet cycle. Deposition of fibrin, platelets and platelet thrombi on vascular subendothelium was tested at a defined blood flow and wall shear rate (10 ml/min, 650 s-1) and was quantified by morphometrical techniques. Treatment with the low and high dose contraceptive increased the plasma levels of ethinyl estradiol (728 +/- 139 and 1438 +/- 212 vs. 0 fmol/l [low and high dose vs. control], means +/- SEM, P less than 0.001) and fibrinogen (2.3 +/- 0.1 and 2.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.1 g/l, P less than 0.05); and decreased antithrombin III activity (95 +/- 3 and 92 +/- 3 vs. 101 +/- 3 %, P less than 0.05). Fibrin deposition on vascular subendothelium was enhanced by the high dose contraceptive only (47 +/- 4 vs. 35 +/- 4 % coverage of the subendothelial surface with fibrin, high dose vs. control, P less than 0.05). The subendothelial deposition of platelets and platelet thrombi was not changed by contraceptive treatment. These results indicate that treatment with high dose contraceptives leads to an increase of fibrin-subendothelial interactions, whereas low dose contraceptives do not significantly alter the blood-subendothelium interactions. observed in this ex vivo model of thrombogenesis.

Complexion changes in oral contraceptive users. Results from a phase IV multicenter trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of ethynodiol diacetate, 1 mg, with ethinyl estradiol, 35 micrograms

An open-label, phase IV, multicenter survey of obstetrician-gynecologists was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose monophasic oral contraceptive, ethynodiol diacetate, 1 mg, with ethinyl estradiol, 35 micrograms. Surveys from 983 community-based physicians reported on 6,382 women. Most patients did not experience "clinically noticeable complexion changes" (5,695/6,382, or 89.2%). Of the 687 patients with complexion changes, nearly three-fourths reported an improvement (501/687, or 72.9%). A follow-up questionnaire was sent to 127 respondents (18.6%) who reported worsening of the complexion; 70% of the questionnaires were returned. Most complexion worsening was of slight degree (63%), reported by the patient and not the physician (84% vs. 16%), and experienced during the first two to three months (84%). Although the literature includes many references to skin condition "improvement" on oral contraceptives, this report of a descriptive study gives clinicians as estimate of the incidence and severity of complexion changes in actual use.