Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects

Depo Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate, DMPA) when given as 150 mg by deep intramuscular injection every 12 calendar weeks (84 days+5 days), is a highly effective contraceptive with a very low failure rate comparable to modern copper IUDs and lower than many other methods. It should be available as a first line method to all who wish to make an informed choice about reversible methods of contraception. Pre-use counselling is essential to minimise the effect of menstrual change which occurs in most patients. However there is great patient variability. Use of DMPA is independent of intercourse and also independent of the user's memory (and thus of continuing motivation), other than remembering the 12 weekly appointments. For many women this is a great advantage. Oral contraceptive methods involve remembering to take a pill each day, in the case of the progestogen only pill within the same three hours each day. This places considerable strain on women who lead irregular lifestyles, who are very busy or travel frequently. Such women often describe a constant 'fear of forgetting', especially with the POP. The main potential disadvantage of DMPA in this country are likely to be menstrual disturbance and weight gain. The combined oral contraceptive pill gives the appearance of excellent cycle control because it removes the natural cycle altogether and replaces it with an artificial one. All progestogen-only methods, whether low or high dose, lead to menstrual disturbances, so in this respect DMPA is not unique. Although troublesome, the menstrual disturbances which occur in DMPA users very rarely require operative medical intervention, and can often be improved simply by short courses of oestrogen or shorter injection intervals. Again, women need to know what can be done so that they are aware that they should seek advice early, rather than miserably waiting.for their 12 week appointment. DMPA has no appreciable effects on blood pressure or thrombosis risk. In this it has an advantage over the combined oral contraceptive pill, and provides a simple, effective alternative for women who cannot use the pill for these reasons. Similarly, it has been suggested that women who suffer from focal migraine and are therefore advised against use of the combined oral contraceptive pill can still use progestogen-only contraceptives. Although the POP is medically safe in these circumstances, in young women it is less effective, and involves strict time keeping, which will be disadvantageous for some women. Side effects, long term use and schedules of administration are also discussed. The use of local protocols to allow nurse administration is to be supported both in general practice and the clinic situation. Perhaps the most important issue surrounding the use of DMPA is that of patient information. The method has had a particularly bad public image, which naturally makes potential users anxious and subject to misinformation from poorly informed or biased sources. Also, it is temporarily irreversible during its three months duration, so the duration of any problems or anxieties resulting from side effects may be longer than for other methods. It is of paramount importance that easily understood, accurate patient information leaflets are available, since biased and inaccurate information is readily available from women's magazines, perpetuating the myths surrounding the method.

Decline in bone mineral density with stress fractures in a woman on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. A case report

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate is a popular contraceptive among young, physically active women. However, its administration has been linked to a relative decrease in estrogen levels. Since bone resorption is accelerated during hypoestrogenic states, there has been growing concern about the potential development of osteoporosis and fractures with the use of this contraceptive method.

CASE

A physically active, 33-year-old woman demonstrated a 12.4% drop in femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), 6.4% drop in lumbar BMD and 0.8% drop in total BMD with the subsequent development of a tibial stress fracture while on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Bone mineralization rapidly improved, and the stress fracture resolved with discontinuation of the medication.

CONCLUSION

The long-term effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mineralization in physically active women should be evaluated more thoroughly.

Long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density

The association between long-term use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and bone mineral density (BMD) has been controversial, as seen in three case-control studies in New Zealand, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. In the present case-controlled study of BMD, a group of 67 Chinese women who had used DMPA from 5-15 years was compared with 218 women of the same age range who had not used any steroidal hormones. DMPA users were found to have a significantly lower BMD at lumbar vertebra (L2-4) (0.93 g/cm2), neck of femur (0.69 g/cm2), trochanter (0.59 g/cm2), and Ward's triangle (0.58 g/cm2), as compared with the control group, whose corresponding BMD values were 1.03 g/cm2, 0.83 g/cm2, 0.71 g/cm2, and 0.78 g/cm2, respectively (p < 0.001). The average percentage of bone loss per year was estimated to be 1.1% in L2-4, 2.3% in neck of femur, 2.4% in trochanter, and 3.5% in Ward's triangle. The percentage of bone loss in L2-4 was found to be more pronounced with age. This study provided information that the use of DMPA in a Chinese group for > 5 years in associated with bone loss, and a prospective study is needed to confirm these data, which are different from two case-control studies.

Bone density among long-term users of medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive

The bone density (BD) of 72 women using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for at least 1 year was compared with that of 64 women who were not users of hormonal contraceptives. The BD of lumbar spine, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and trochanter was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA-LUNAR DPX). Estradiol (E2) concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). The mean age of DMPA users and nonusers was 31.8 and 31.1 years, respectively. Mean E, was 55.7 pg/mL for users and 149.9 pg/mL for controls (p < 0.001). The BD was significantly lower for DMPA users than for controls in all sites (p < 0.01). In addition, young adult T-scores in the lumbar spine were significantly lower among DMPA users than in controls (p < 0.01). Differences were maintained in a subsample of 47 women per group paired by age and body mass index (BMI). Multiple regression analysis showed that older age, lower BMI, and longer amenorrhea were associated with lower BD in the femoral neck, whereas lower BMI and use of DMPA were associated with lower BD in the lumbar spine.

Bone density in long term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To identify any adverse effect on bone density in long term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional measurement of bone density in users with amenorrhoea of more than one year or any woman using DMPA for more than five years.

SETTING

Community Family Planning Clinics in Portsmouth and Manchester.

POPULATION

One hundred and eighty-five women aged 17-52 years (mean 33.3 years) who had used DMPA for between 1 and 16 years and were attending the clinics for further injections, between August 1994 and August 1996.

METHODS

Dual energy X-ray measurement of bone density of femoral neck and lumbar spine, and venous blood sample taken just prior to the next injection of DMPA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bone density of femoral neck and lumbar spine and serum oestradiol in relationship to years of DMPA use and duration of amenorrhoea.

RESULTS

Most women (n=153) had serum oestradiol levels < 150 pmol/l. Despite this, the mean bone density of the lumbar spine compared with the population mean for women aged 20-59 years gave a Z score (95% CI) of -0.332 (-0.510 to -0.154). There was no significant difference in the mean density of the femoral neck from the normal population mean.

CONCLUSION

Despite amenorrhoea and low serum oestradiol, this sample of long term DMPA users had bone density only minimally below the normal population mean. We therefore found no clinically important adverse effect on bone density and therefore no reason to recommend bone conserving measures, such as add-back oestrogen.

Depressive symptoms and Depo-Provera

Women enrolled in a multicenter prospective study were evaluated to identify any possible relationship between depressive symptoms and the use of contraceptives. Women choosing Depo-Provera (n = 495) were evaluated before starting these contraceptives and were reinterviewed 1 year later. Women who continued the method had lower depressive symptom scores at baseline than did the women who discontinued the method or who were lost to follow-up. Among the continuing Depo-Provera users, the depressive symptom scores improved slightly at 1 year (7.4 vs 6.7). Those subjects with the highest (i.e., worst) scores at enrollment demonstrated improved scores at follow-up.

Effectiveness of Cyclofem in the treatment of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate induced amenorrhea

A total of 100 women who were using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception and who had experienced at least 6 months of drug induced amenorrhea, were randomized to either switching their method of contraception to Cyclofem, or continuing with DMPA. At the end of 6 months, 82% of the Cyclofem users had experienced some vaginal bleeding, compared with 10% of DMPA users. Time to resumption of vaginal bleeding was related to the duration of DMPA use to the duration of DMPA induced amenorrhea, and to the body mass index of the user. Over the 6 months of follow-up, 94% of Cyclofem users complained of some side effects, compared with 22% of DMPA users. The most frequently cited problems among Cyclofem users included breast tenderness, abdominal pain, and dysmenorrhea; yet a third of these women opted to stay on Cyclofem at the end of the study. It is concluded that switching to Cyclofem is a new option for DMPA users who are concerned about amenorrhea. Although using Cyclofem in this setting will not meet the needs of all such women, its effectiveness in inducing vaginal bleeding justifies a trial in those who have no contraindication to estrogen treatment.

Introductory study of the once-a-month, injectable contraceptive Cyclofem in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru

An introductory trial with the injectable contraceptive Cyclofem was carried out in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru, with participation by 3,183 women. Women were followed-up for up to 2 years of use and the data were evaluated by life table analysis. A total of 29,676 women-months were accumulated for up to 2 years. No pregnancies were observed in the 2 years. The discontinuation rates for amenorrhea in the first year ranged from 3.4 in Brazil to 8.1 in Colombia, and for menstrual disturbances from 5.1 in Chile to 9.2 in Brazil. The discontinuation rates for other medical reasons ranged from 7.8 in Brazil to 26.3 in Colombia, and for personal reasons from 17.2 in Chile to 23.5 in Brazil. Continuation rates ranged from 42.3 in Colombia to 52 in Chile. In the second year of observation the rates of discontinuation were lower than those observed in the first year, with the exception of personal reasons in Brazil, which were the same as those observed in the first year. Continuation rates ranged from 19.4 in Brazil to 36.8 in Chile. The comparison of reasons for discontinuation in selected clinics showed that the rate for amenorrhea in one clinic in Chile was more than three times that in others and in Peru was seven times more in one clinic than in another. Regarding menstrual disturbances, in Peru one clinic presented a rate three times higher than the others. The main reasons for discontinuation due to other medical reasons were headache and weight gain. In conclusion, Cyclofem presented a high contraceptive efficacy and an acceptable rate of continuation and discontinuation for up to 2 years in the four countries.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate pioneers. A retrospective study at a North Carolina Health Department

This article examines the characteristics of the first group of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) acceptors after US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the method and evaluates their continuation rates and factors associated with discontinuation. This was a population based retrospective study based on 12 months of clinic data for 510 women who began using DMPA in 1993 at a large county health department. Cumulative 12 month life table rates were calculated for the entire group and were then stratified by selected characteristics. The 4, 8, and 12 month continuation rates were 67%, 46%, and 35%, respectively. More than half of these women discontinued because of bleeding and nonbleeding side effects (25% and 28%, respectively). Almost 20% of these women were considered discontinuers because they waited longer than 16 weeks to return for an injection. As measured in this study, continuation rates for this first group of DMPA acceptors were low. The next step is to determine if the characteristics and patterns of use of these "pioneer" acceptors are representative of more recent acceptors, and if lessons learned from this group will lead to higher continuation rates.

Depot medroxyprogesterone. Management of side-effects commonly associated with its contraceptive use

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate is one of the most popular, effective methods of contraception used in the United States. Many women experience unpleasant side effects from this method, including episodic vaginal bleeding, hair loss, depression, and weight gain. This Clinical Practice Exchange describes the treatment strategies for these side-effects used by nurse-midwives from a variety of settings and locales. Contraceptive use can be more acceptable for many women if they are better able to cope with unpleasant side effects of the method. This Clinical Practice Exchange provides knowledge to enhance client coping.

New contraceptives in the 1990s

This article reviews the contraceptive methods levonorgestrel implants and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. These methods provide effective and safe contraception for adolescents and adults. This review focuses on the use of these contraceptive techniques in the adolescent population, discussing patient selection, side effects, and controversies concerning the methods. Future hormonal contraceptive methods are also discussed.

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns

Between 1988 and 1992, a randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted in China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries provided by 5098 (89%) of the subjects. In total, 902, 903 and 913 diaries were analyzed to compare bleeding patterns induced by Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. The first withdrawal bleeding usually occurs 14-20 days after the first injection for all three of these preparations. Thereafter, 50% of Mesigyna users had precisely 3 bleeding/spotting episodes every 90 days, 50% of Cyclofem users had 2-3 and 50% of Injectable No. 1 users had 3-4 episodes every 90 days. Relative to users of Mesigyna or Cyclofem, Injectable No. 1 users had 2-3 more bleeding/spotting days, and a shorter length of bleeding/spotting-free intervals in each period. 63.7%, 41.4% and 60.6% of subjects using Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively, had bleeding patterns similar to their untreated patterns in the first 90-day period. The percentages increased to 82.2% 67.8% and 75.0% in the fourth 90-day period. A total of 1815 diaries for Mesigyna and 1802 for Cyclofem were analyzed for more in depth comparison of these two methods. The number of bleeding/spotting days over four periods showed little difference between the two group, but there were more spotting days and there was greater individual variability among Cyclofem users.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fasting plasma lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in Nigerian women using combined oral and progestin-only injectable contraceptives

Fasting plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (apo) profiles were determined in Nigerian women using a low-dose combined oral (Lo-Feminal + Fe) (n = 18), a progestin-only injectable (Depo-Provera) (n = 16) contraceptives and matched controls (n = 18). The mean of plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apo B and Lp(a) were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in women using contraceptives than the controls. The mean of total and LDL-cholesterol and apo B were also significantly higher in the oral contraceptive users than those on progestin-only injectables. Furthermore, the mean of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk indices, total/HDL-cholesterol (p < 0.05) and LDL/HDL-cholesterol (p < 0.01), were significantly higher in women on oral contraceptives than the controls. There were no statistically significant differences between the indices in the women using progestin-only injectables and the controls. Based on this finding, it is concluded that the use of steroidal contraceptives is associated with alterations of lipid and apolipoprotein profiles in Nigerian women and that the use of low-dose combined oral contraceptives may be associated with an increased CVD risk.

In utero exposure to steroid contraceptives and outcome of pregnancy

A cohort study of women who used steroid contraceptives during pregnancy was conducted in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand, between 1984 and 1987. There were 1,573 pregnancies in which the fetus was exposed to the injectable contraceptive Depo-Provera (The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan) (830 accidental pregnancies and 743 infants conceived before the mother started use of Depo-Provera), 601 accidental pregnancies in women who were using oral contraceptives, and 2,578 planned pregnancies with no steroid exposures (controls). Subjects were followed up for interview, and medical records were traced for birth weight. Women using Depo-Provera had more risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes than did the other groups. The adjusted odds ratios for low birth weight were increased for accidental pregnancies with fetal exposure to Depo-Provera (odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.2-1.9) or oral contraceptives (OR = 1.5, 95% Cl 1.2-2.0). The higher risk of low birth weight among infants exposed in utero to Depo-Provera or oral contraceptives is due in part to self-selection for adverse outcomes among women with unplanned pregnancies. However, among accidental pregnancies with Depo-Provera, the risk of low birth weight was significantly increased when conception was estimated to have occurred within 4 weeks of injection. The odds ratios were 1.9 (95% Cl 1.4-3.2) for injection-to-conception intervals of less than or equal to 4 weeks, 1.5 (95% Cl 0.9-2.3) for intervals of 5-8 weeks, and 1.2 (95% Cl 0.7-1.9) for intervals of greater than or equal to 9 weeks. This trend was highly significant. Thus, the authors conclude that early, high-dose in utero exposures to Depo-Provera may affect fetal growth.

Effect of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate on coagulation factors and serum lipids in Egyptian women

The short-term (3 months) and long-term (15 months) effect of DMPA contraception on various coagulation parameters (predictive of thrombosis) and on serum lipids (predictive of atherosclerosis) were prospectively studied in 30 Egyptian women, compared to their pretreatment levels. There were no significant changes in all the coagulation parameters studied after 3 months, and there was only a significant reduction in antithrombin III (AT III) level after 15 months (p less than 0.01). Concerning serum lipids, after 3 months, there were no significant changes in total lipids (TL), total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (Tg), while there was a significant decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p less than 0.001), and a significant increase in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p less than 0.01). After 15 months there was a significant increase in TL, TC and LDL-C (p less than 0.001) and a significant decrease in HDL-C (p less than 0.001). Lipoprotein electrophoresis showed no significant change in pre-beta-lipoprotein percent, a significant decrease in alpha-lipoprotein percent and a significant increase in beta-lipoprotein percent after 3 and 15 months (p less than 0.001). Beta-lipoprotein band increased in 50% of DMPA users after 3 months and in 90% after 15 months and the type of hyperlipoproteinaemia was IIa. All calculated atherogenic indices showed significant changes (p less than 0.001) after 3 and 15 months of DMPA use. There was no significant correlation between AT III changes and changes in serum lipids. The study suggests no risk of thrombosis after 3 and 15 months of DMPA use. However, the risk of atherosclerosis appears to be possible as there were significant changes in serum lipids.

Injectable contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer: evidence of an association

In a case-control study conducted in Latin America, the relationship of injectable contraceptive (IC) use to risk of invasive cervical cancer was analyzed while controlling for a variety of other risk factors, including female and spouse sexual behavior and infection with human papillomaviruses (HPV). Thirty-two cases and 82 controls reported ever having used IC. Women reporting use of IC for less than 5 years had an adjusted RR of 0.5 (95% Cl = 0.3-0.9), but users for 5 or more years had an RR of 2.4 (95% Cl = 1.0-5.7). The effect of prolonged IC use was stronger for women reporting first use 10 or more years before interview (adjusted RR = 3.4, 95% Cl = 1.1-24.9) and more than 5 years since last use (adjusted RR = 5.3, 95% Cl = 1.1-10.0). Cervical cancer risk associated with prolonged IC use was particularly high among women who reported never having had a Pap smear or having had one 2 or more years before interview (adjusted RR = 6.3, 95% Cl = 2.1-18.7). The reduced cervical cancer risk associated with short-term use of IC may reflect intensive Pap smear screening as the method is initiated. Although hampered by small numbers, these results suggest an adverse effect of prolonged IC use on cervical cancer risk, particularly among women who cease participation in screening programs after terminating usage, and indicate that long-term IC users should be monitored for cervical disease until more conclusive results are available.

Estrogen-progestogen once-a-month injectable contraceptives and serum prolactin

To assess the effect of hormonal monthly injectable contraceptives upon the serum values of immunoreactive prolactin (Prl), three groups of women of reproductive age exposed to different estrogen-progestogen injectable formulation for a minimum of one year were studied. The first group (n = 10) received dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 150 mg and estradiol enanthate 10 mg (DHPA/E2-EN), Group 2 (n = 21) received medroxyprogesterone acetate 25 mg and estradiol cypionate 5 mg (MPA/E2-C) and Group 3 (n = 19) was exposed to norethisterone enanthate 50 mg and estradiol valerate 5 mg (NET-EN/E2-V). A group of IUD users (n = 16) served as the control group. Serum Prl and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) concentration were determined in blood samples (0 and 15 min.) on days 0 (day of last injection), 10, 20 and 30 after last contraceptive injection. The results demonstrated a slight though not significant increase (p greater than 0.05) in serum Prl in the three experimental groups as compared with the IUD control group. This increase in Prl levels observed on day 10 post-last injection never exceeded the upper limits of the normal range (20 ng/ml). Overall, the data demonstrated that the chronic administration of these estrogen/progestogen once-a-month injectable contraceptives does not affect the Prl baseline secretion in women.

Steroid contraceptive use and pregnancy outcome

Contraceptive use in relation to pregnancy outcome was studied in 8,816 births in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand, by examination of newborn infants and interviews with their mothers. Four thousand twenty-three women used no contraception before the index pregnancy, 1,229 used the injectable contraceptive Depo Provera (DMPA), and 3,038 used oral contraceptives prior to or during pregnancy. No differences were observed between these groups with respect to still births, multiple pregnancies, and birthweight. Women who used oral contraceptives had unexpectedly low rates of major defects and may have been affected by self-selection bias, whereas the noncontraceptors had rates similar to other populations. There was a significantly increased association of polysyndactyly among infants of DMPA users relative to the other groups, which was most pronounced in offspring of women under age 30 years, and persisted after exclusion of subjects with a family history or infants with multiple abnormalities. However, in five out of the ten polysyndactyly cases, the last injection of DMPA occurred more than 9 months before conception, and only three cases had definite gestational exposure. The association of chromosomal anomalies was also significantly increased in infants of mothers who used DMPA. The unrelated nature of these defects, the lack of confirmation from other studies, the distant preconceptional exposure to DMPA in many cases, and chance effects due to multiple statistical comparisons make a causal association unlikely. Other birth defects that had been previously reported in some publications to be associated with progestational steroid exposure, such as neural tube defects, heart malformations, and limb reduction defects, were not found in this study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A study of adrenal corticol function and its reserve activity in long-acting injectable contraceptive users

Adrenal function and its reserve capacity were studied in eighteen healthy non-lactating women who received depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA: 9 subjects) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN: 9 subjects) as long-acting injectable contraceptives. Methodological assessments included: (i) morning fasting concentration of serum cortisol; (ii) diurnal variation of adrenal corticol activity as evidenced by cortisol concentration in serum samples taken at 0700 and 1600 hours; (iii) urinary free cortisol excretion; and (iv) cortisol response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. None of these assessments was significantly altered by contraceptive administration. This finding indicates that the subject's ability to release cortisol in response to a stressful situation, as well as to normal day-to-day activity, was not impaired by these contraceptive steroids.

A comparative study of the metabolic effects of injectable and oral contraceptives

The metabolic effects of an injectable contraceptive, Depo-provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate), an oral contraceptive pill containing 50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 500 micrograms norgestrel and a control group (not on contraceptives) were compared in 3 groups, each comprising 32 women. The subjects were matched for race, age and parity. Mean duration of treatment was 41.7 +/- 18.3 months for Depo-provera and 59.6 +/- 29.0 months for the pill group. Glucose tolerance was impaired in both treatment groups. The combination pill showed more changes in both glucose tolerance and insulin response. Lipid levels remained unchanged in both treatment groups.

Factors associated with the perception of side-effects relating to the use of contraceptive methods

Limited research has been done in South Africa regarding the incidence of side-effects and perceptions of these among users of contraceptives. Numerous knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) surveys have been conducted by the Human Sciences Research Council (Erasmus 1981a; Erasmus 1981b; Erasmus 1982 ; Groenewald 1978 ; Lótter, Van Tonder 1976; Mostert, Malherbe 1974; Mostert 1974; Strydom 1981; Van der Merwe 1982) and in some of these studies questions concerning side-effects were included to determine reasons for discontinuation of specific contraceptive methods. The literature concerning research on side-effects related to contraceptive use usually pertains either to clinical studies

Return of fertility after use of the injectable contraceptive Depo Provera: up-dated data analysis

Seven hundred and ninety six Thai women who stopped using the long-acting injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo Provera), 437 women who stopped using oral contraceptives and 125 women who had an IUD removed to have a planned pregnancy, were followed up to ascertain the delay to conception after the end of contraception and to determine the proportion of women who did not conceive in the 4 years after discontinuation. The median delay to conception was 5·5 months plus the estimated duration of the effect of the last injection of DMPA, 3 months for oral contraceptives and 4·5 months after discontinuing the IUD. The proportion of women who did not conceive within 9 months after discontinuation of DMPA is similar to that of ex-IUD users, and by 3 years to that of the ex-pill sample. There is no evidence to suggest that prolonged use of DMPA increases the delay to conception, and the return of fertility among never pregnant ex-users resembled that of ever pregnant ex-users.

There were comparable proportions of live births among ex-DMPA users and ex-pill users and both of these showed higher proportions of live-births than ex-IUD users. There was no evidence to suggest that previous use of DMPA had any significant adverse effect on the outcome of pregnancy of the subsequent births. This study did not show any association between infertility and the previous use of DMPA or other contraceptives.

A survey of different approaches to management of menstrual disturbances in women using injectable contraceptives

This report summarises a survey of the management of menstrual disturbances occurring during injectable progestogen use (depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, DMPA, and norethisterone enanthate, NET-EN) by 35 investigators from 20 countries with ongoing experience of these contraceptives. A wide range of approaches are described. The most frequently emphasised aspect of management is thorough pre-treatment counselling with further support and counselling at follow-up visits. Oestrogens in various forms are widely used for the treatment of prolonged, frequent or heavy episodes of bleeding, but nowadays are not usually used for the induction of withdrawal bleeding in women with amenorrhoea. Heavy or "severe" bleeding appears to be very uncommon and figures of 1-2% were frequently mentioned. Anecdotal information suggests that intramuscular doses or longer courses (14-21 days) of oral oestrogen, including the combined pill, are more likely to successfully stop an episode of bleeding than short courses. However, there are no hard data to show that a course of oestrogen treatment has any beneficial effect on long-term bleeding patterns. Nevertheless, temporary cessation of spotting or light bleeding may be sufficiently reassuring to the patient to ensure continued use of the method. There appears to be very little risk associated with the short-term oestrogen regimens currently used. Dilatation and curettage is almost never necessary to stop an episode of bleeding, but may occasionally be recommended for diagnostic reasons. It is clear that the bleeding disturbances associated with DMPA and NET-EN use are poorly understood and that urgent research is necessary to clarify pathophysiological mechanisms and improve management.

Long acting injectable hormonal contraceptives

Injectable hormonal preparations can be highly effective and satisfactory contraceptives. The two main preparations available today are depot medroxy progesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone oenanthate (NET-OEN), but several other approaches are currently under clinical trial. Injectable contraceptives have some unique advantages which give them justifiably wide appeal amongst many groups of women. However, they do have a number of disadvantages including invariable menstrual disturbance and a delay in the return of fertility. One formulation of DMPA, Depo-Provera, is probably the most extensively investigated single hormonal contraceptive ever made. These studies indicate that it is remarkably safe and does not face any more unresolved issues than the combined pill, intrauterine device or tubal sterilization. However, for a number of disparate emotional and political reasons it has attracted the attention of several consumer and feminist groups, who have waged a prolonged and quite unjustified campaign against it. It is to be hoped that future debate will be conducted on a more informed, rational and less emotional basis. Injectable contraceptives should have an important place in the family planning armamentarium of all countries, and current developments should lead to a decrease in concerns about presently available agents. This should further increase the widespread acceptability of this approach to contraception.