Resection of the perforated segment. A significant advance in treatment of diverticulitis with free perforation or abscess

Emergency Presentations of Diverticulitis

Acute diverticulitis is a common condition that has been increasing in incidence in the United States. It is associated with increasing age, but the pathophysiology of acute diverticulitis is still being elucidated. It is now believed to have a significant contribution from inflammatory processes rather than being a strictly infectious process. There are still many questions to be answered regarding the optimal management of acute diverticulitis because recent studies have challenged traditional practices, such as the routine use of antibiotics, surgical technique, and dietary restrictions for prevention of recurrence.

A historical review of surgery for peritonitis secondary to acute colonic diverticulitis: from Lockhart-Mummery to evidence-based medicine

The management of patients with colonic diverticular perforation is still evolving. Initial lavage with or without simple suture and drainage was suggested in the late 19th century, replaced progressively by the three-stage Mayo Clinic or the two-stage Mickulicz procedures. Fears of inadequate source control prompted the implementation of the resection of the affected segment of colon with formation of a colostomy (Hartman procedure) in the 1970’s. Ensuing development of the treatment strategies was driven by the recognition of the high morbidity and mortality and low reversal rates associated with the Hartman procedure. This led to the wider use of resection and primary anastomosis during the 1990’s.

The technique of lavage and drainage regained popularity during the 1990’s. This procedure can also be performed laparoscopically with the advantage of faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. This strategy allows resectional surgery to be postponed or avoided altogether in many patients; and higher rates of primary resection and anastomosis can be achieved avoiding the need for a stoma. The three recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic peritoneal lavage alone to resectional surgery reported inconsistent outcomes.

The aim of this review is to review the historical evolution and future reflections of surgical treatment modalities for diffuse purulent and feculent peritonitis. In this review we classified the various surgical strategies according to Krukowski et al. and Vermeulen et al. and reviewed the literature related to surgical treatment separately for each period.

Is it safe and useful, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in the treatment of acute diverticulitis of octogenarian patients? A multicenter retroprospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Diverticular disease of the colon also affects older people. Generally, older patients with diverticulitis may be regarded as too risky to undergo surgery. This retroprospective multicentric observational study aims to assess the safety and benefits of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) in elderly patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We hospitalized in urgency 100 patients, aged over 75, for sigmoid diverticulitis. Sixty-nine patients were treated with conservative medical therapy, while 31 were treated surgically, in which the surgery was performed in urgency in 18 cases, while in election in 13 cases. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage was made in urgency in five cases.

RESULTS

The mean age of the sample was 81.72. Thirty-one patients underwent surgery, and five patients were treated in urgency with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Perioperative mortality was zero. None of the patients who underwent laparoscopic peritoneal lavage showed recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic laparoscopy can be useful in elderly patient, since these patients may benefit from a more conservative surgical strategy. The selection of patients to be subjected to laparoscopic lavage must be very rigorous.

Experience of General Surgery Residents in the Creation of Small Bowel and Colon Anastomoses

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of stapling devices (SDs), the proportion of hand-sewn (HS) intestinal anastomoses (IAs) has declined. As more IAs are constructed with SDs, there are fewer opportunities for general surgery residents (GSRs) to acquire the skills for HS techniques during their training.

STUDY DESIGN

Data for this study were extracted from an existing database of all IAs performed at the Department of Surgery of the Morristown Medical Center since 2003. For the purposes of this study, a 5.5-year timeframe was used between July 2006 and 2011, which contained 1659 IA operations on adult patients with resident involvement. GSRs of the 5-year general surgery residency program were grouped by postgraduate year (PGY) for further analysis.

RESULTS

The number of all IAs created by each resident during the 5-year training was 67.2 on average. Most of these operations were done in the last 2 years of the training: 45.1% of all IAs in PGY5 and 37.3% of all IAs in PGY4. Of all, 1659 IAs performed in the study period, 711 (42.9% of total) were done laparoscopically and 948 (57.1% of all IAs) were done as open operations. Laparoscopic operations had a proportionally higher rate of SD use when compared to open cases (90.9% vs 82.4%). On average, each resident constructed 9.4 HS IAs (13.98% of all IAs) and 57.8 SD IAs (86.02% of total). Out of all anastomoses, ostomy reversals (30.7%) had the highest percentage of HS suturing followed by right colectomies (27.5%), ileal pouch-anal anastomoses and total colectomies and proctocolectomies (23.3%), small bowel resection (17.0%), and left colectomies (5.5%). Regardless of the location of the operation, stapled and sutured anastomoses had similar outcomes measured by the rate of anastomotic leaks. Residents used significantly more SDs in the creation of anastomoses than HS suturing in the PGY3, PGY4, and PGY5 years. We also documented that attending surgeons who are older more often used HS suturing than their younger colleagues when creating IAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The experiences of GSRs in IA operations are heavily weighted toward the use of SDs. There are select cases, however, when HS suturing can have an advantage over stapler use in anastomosis creation. Therefore, we believe that GSRs should continue learning, perfecting, and using the both techniques.

Minimally Invasive Management of Complicated Diverticular Disease: Current Status and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis is a common condition which carries significant morbidity and socioeconomic burden (McGillicuddy et al in Arch Surg 144:1157-1162, 2009). The surgical management of diverticulitis has undergone significant changes in recent years. This article reviews the role of minimally invasive approach in management of complicated diverticulitis, with a focus on recent concepts and advances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review of past 10 years (January 2004 to September 2014) was performed using the electronic database MEDLINE from PubMed which included articles only in English.

RESULTS

We identified total of 139 articles, out of which 50 were excluded resulting in 89 full-text articles for review 16 retrospective studies, 7 prospective cohorts, 1 case-control series and 1 systematic review were included. These suggest that urgent surgery is performed for those with sepsis and diffuse peritonitis or those who fail to improve despite medical therapy and/or percutaneous drainage. In addition, 3 randomized control trials: DILALA, LapLAND and the Scandinavian Diverticulitis trial are working towards evaluating whether laparoscopic lavage is safe in management of complicated diverticular diseases. Growing trend toward conservative or minimally invasive treatment modality even in severe acute diverticulitis was noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has evolved as a good alternative to invasive surgery, yet clear indications for its role in the management of complicated diverticulitis need to be established. Recent evidence suggests that existing guidelines for optimal management of complicated diverticulitis should be updated. Non-resectional radiographic techniques are likely to play a prominent role in the initial treatment of complicated diverticulitis in the near future.

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage: a definitive treatment for diverticular peritonitis or a "bridge" to elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy?: a systematic review

To this day, the treatment of generalized peritonitis secondary to diverticular perforation is still controversial. Recently, in patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis, laparoscopic lavage and drainage has gained a wide interest as an alternative to resection. Based on this backdrop, we decided to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of peritoneal lavage in perforated diverticular disease.A bibliographic search was performed in PubMed for case series and comparative studies published between January 1992 and February 2014 describing laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with perforated diverticulitis.A total of 19 articles consisting of 10 cohort studies, 8 case series, and 1 controlled clinical trial met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. In total these studies analyzed data from 871 patients. The mean follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 96 months when reported. In 11 studies, the success rate of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, defined as patients alive without surgical treatment for a recurrent episode of diverticulitis, was 24.3%. In patients with Hinchey stage III diverticulitis, the incidence of laparotomy conversion was 1%, whereas in patients with stage IV it was 45%. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.9%. The 30-day postoperative reintervention rate was 4.9%, whereas 2% of patients required a percutaneous drainage. Readmission rate after the first hospitalization for recurrent diverticulitis was 6%. Most patients who were readmitted (69%) required redo surgery. A 2-stage laparoscopic intervention was performed in 18.3% of patients.Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage should be considered an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid diverticulitis with Hinchey stage III peritonitis; it can also be consider as a "bridge" surgical step combined with a delayed and elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in order to avoid a Hartmann procedure. This minimally invasive staged approach should be considered for patients without systemic toxicity and in centers experienced in minimally invasive surgery techniques. Further evidence is needed, and the ongoing RCTs will better define the role of the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage/drainage in the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis.

Laparoscopy in diverticular disease: Controversies

A minimally invasive approach to the management of diverticular disease has gained acceptance over the last number of years. Certainly, in the elective setting, laparoscopic sigmoid resection compares favourably with open surgery. The use of laparoscopy in the context of emergency surgery for complicated diverticular disease remains controversial however recent studies have demonstrated a defined role for laparoscopy in the acute setting.

Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease

Despite its potential advantages, laparoscopic management of diverticular disease is currently performed by a minority of surgeons on a small group of patients. However, the role for laparoscopy in diverticular disease continues to develop. At present, adequate evidence exists for the routine use of laparoscopy for uncomplicated diverticular disease. Complicated disease, including fistulizing disease and free perforation requires additional expertise and study. As the experience grows among individual surgeons and institutions, it can be expected that the complication and conversion rates will continue to decline allowing even further evolution of laparoscopy for the treatment of this challenging disease process.

Treatment of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

The supposed optimal treatment of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis has changed several times during the last century, but at present is still unclear.

METHODS/RESULTS

The first cases of complicated perforated diverticulitis of the colon were reported in the beginning of the twentieth century. At that time the first therapeutic guidelines were postulated in which an initial nonresectional procedure was provided to be the safest plan of management. After many years in which resection had become standard practice, today, one century later, again (laparoscopic) nonresectional surgery is presented as a safe and promising alternative in treatment of complicated perforated diverticulitis. The question rises what had happened to close the circle?

CONCLUSIONS

This paper includes a historic summary of changing patterns in surgical strategies in perforated diverticulitis complicated by generalized peritonitis.

Article Commentary: Current Management of Diverticulitis

Diverticulitis is classified as uncomplicated or complicated, i.e., associated with perforation, fistula, or obstruction. CT allows more reliable characterization of an acute attack of diverticulitis. Medical management is reserved for uncomplicated diverticulitis and the initial phase of treatment of diverticulitis associated with abscess formation. Percutaneous abscess drainage is a major advance, which permits one-stage resection in a majority of cases. Diverticulitis associated with free perforation can be selectively managed with resection and primary anastomosis, although a Hartmann resection is likely to be performed. A fistula associated with diverticulitis can usually be managed with a one-stage resection. Obstruction can be managed selectively with resection with on-table bowel preparation, primary anastomosis, and proximal diversion. Laparoscopic techniques permit successful performance of elective resections most of the time. Hand assistance is of particular value when the patient has dense fibrosis.

Hartmann's colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: a population-level assessment

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the costs and outcomes of colostomy and colostomy reversal in patients with diverticulitis and examine the impact of such procedures on the health care system.

METHODS

We employed a retrospective design and used a Washington State administrative database to identify patients undergoing operations with colostomy (1987-2002) who were followed over time. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed, focusing on patients with diverticulitis.

RESULTS

There were 16,556 patients who underwent colostomy and 5,420 (32.7 percent) were for diverticulitis and its related complications (mean age, 64.8 +/- 15.1 years; 53.2 percent female). In patients with diverticulitis, the rate of colostomy reversal was 56.3 percent (80 percent in patients less than 50 years, and 30 percent in patients over 77 years). The in-hospital mortality rate after colostomy reversal was 0.36 percent, and was 2.6 percent in those over 77 years of age. After colostomy reversal a second stoma was used in 3.4 percent, reoperation was required for bleeding complications in 0.6 percent, and infectious complications were noted in 2 percent. The length of time from colostomy to its reversal was approximately five months (138.1 +/- 164 days; interquartile range, 72-156). The relationship between the length of time from colostomy to reversal was evaluated and the adjusted odds of a second stoma being used at the time of colostomy reversal were 45 percent higher (odds ratio, 1.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.22, 1.73) for each increase in time interval (<3, 6-9, 9-12, >12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of all colostomies were related to diverticulitis and only 56 percent were reversed. We identified a higher than expected mortality rate among older patients undergoing colostomy reversal. The impact of colostomy and reversal operations on both patients and the health care system is significant.

Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review was designed to summarize and compare the reported outcomes of one-stage and two-stage operations for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis.

METHODS

This review identified 98 published studies (1957-2003) dealing with the surgical management of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis, either with primary resection and anastomosis or with the Hartmann's procedure. Aggregated results of adverse outcomes were calculated but statistical comparisons were not appropriate because of data and design heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Operative mortality data from patients with diverticular peritonitis undergoing Hartmann's procedure (n = 1,051) were derived from 54 studies. Considering the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal procedures together, the mortality rate was 19.6 percent (18.8 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 0.8 percent for its reversal), the wound infection rate was 29.1 percent (24.2 percent for the Hartmann's procedure and 4.9 percent for its reversal), and stoma complications and anastomotic leaks (in the reversal operation) occurred in 10.3 and 4.3 percent, respectively. Of 569 reported cases of primary anastomosis from 50 studies, the aggregated mortality rate was 9.9 (range, 0-75) percent with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.9 (range, 0-60) percent and a wound infection rate of 9.6 (range, 0-26) percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported mortality and morbidity in patients with diverticular peritonitis who underwent primary anastomosis were not higher than those in patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure were. This suggests that primary anastomosis is a safe operative alternative in certain patients with peritonitis. Despite inclusion of only patients with peritonitis in this analysis, selection bias may have been a limitation and a prospective, randomized trial is recommended.

Surgical Diverticulitis: Treatment Options

Acute diverticulitis requiring surgical intervention has conventionally been treated by resection with colostomy or delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission. Our objective was to determine the outcome for treatment of diverticulitis with resection and primary anastomosis during the same hospitalization. We conducted a retrospective review of patients (n = 74) undergoing surgery for diverticulitis. Groups included: 1) resection with primary anastomosis (n = 33), 2) resection with colostomy followed by a takedown colostomy (n = 32), and 3) delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission (n = 9). Despite local perforation primary anastomosis was often performed unless patients were clinically unstable or had fecal contamination. The operation was urgent in five (15%) patients in Group 1 as compared with 26 patients (88%) in Group 2. Serious intra-abdominal complications occurred in two patients (6%) in Group 1 as compared with nine patients (28%) in Group 2 and one patient (11%) in Group 3. Postoperative abscesses occurred in two patients in Group 1, five patients in Group 2, and one patient in Group 3. We have shown that resection with primary anastomosis for acute diverticulitis—even in selected patients requiring urgent operation—can be safely performed during the same hospital admission with a low complication rate.

Same Admission Colon Resection with Primary Anastomosis for Acute Diverticulitis

Current standard of care for complicated diverticulitis includes urgent resection with colostomy versus antibiotic treatment, followed by delayed resection with primary anastomosis at a second admission. In certain circumstances, it is possible to perform resection and anastomosis on the same admission for acute diverticulitis. A retrospective review was completed for patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis from 1991 to 1998. Groups included: 1) sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis on same admission (n = 18); 2) resection with protective end colostomy (n = 16); and 3) in-patient antibiotic treatment alone, followed by a second admission for resection with primary anastomosis (n = 5). Four patients initially treated with antibiotics worsened symptomatically or developed radiographic evidence of perforation and required resection with colostomy. Five patients in Group 1 had abscesses or contained perforations based on radiographic studies. Findings on CT scans did not predict treatment. Group 1 patients had uneventful recoveries and few minor complications (wound infections and an incisional hernia). One anastomotic leak occurred in Group 2 after colostomy closure. Although there will continue to be a role for emergent operation for diverticulitis, same admission sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis after antibiotic treatment is safe, uses a shorter course of antibiotics, and has a low complication rate.

Prognostic factors for survival in colonic perforation

Colonic perforation is an abdominal emergency with high morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the prognostic relevance of several factors and to characterize patients at high risk. One hundred and twelve patients (61 women, 51 men) were treated for colonic perforation from 1979 to 1992. Diverticulitis [65 patients (58%)] and carcinoma [24 patients (21%)] were the commonest pathology. In 62 cases (55%) perforation was found to be covered; 50 (45%) times it was free. 34 (30%) patients had diffuse peritonitis. Resection with primary anastomosis was performed 43 times (7 times with a protective colostomy). Resection without restoration of the intestinal continuity was carried out 53 times (including 49 Hartmann operations). Suture with drainage was performed 16 times mainly after iatrogenic perforation (8 times with a colostomy). The overall mortality was 19.6% (22 patients). The prognostic importance of various factors was investigated by univariate analysis (Wilcoxon and Chi-square test) and stepwise logistic regression including sex, age, underlying disease, localization and type of perforation, degree of peritonitis, pre- or postoperative organ failure, surgical procedure, reoperation, sepsis and the Mannheimer Peritonitis Index (MPI) score. Age over 65 years (relative risk 4.6, P = 0.0089), organ failure (relative risk 40, P = 0.001) and MPI (relative risk for an increase of 10 points 2.72, P = 0.001) proved to be the only risk factors of significance. The patient's course is determined by the septic state, while the underlying pathology and degree of peritonitis did not significantly influence survival.

Diverticulitis

Diverticulitis is an important complication of diverticulosis that affects only 10% to 20% of patients with this condition. Medical and surgical aspects of management of diverticulitis are discussed in this article. Some unusual and less well-known complications and manifestations of this common clinical problem are also described. This disease remains a challenging problem that demands sound clinical judgement by the internist and the surgeon.

Nonelective colon resection. Alternatives to multistage resections

Compared with the prolonged cumulative hospitalization and morbidity that accompany staged resection for the treatment of obstructing or inflammatory disorders of the left colon, our results confirm that resection with intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis is a safe alternative. In the absence of intraoperative lavage, all patients in our series would have required a multistage procedure. Intraoperative lavage with primary anastomosis does not challenge the accepted criteria for safe bowel anastomosis. Rather, it offers another means for meeting those criteria. This alternative should be considered in the management of any patient whose primary indication for colostomy is the lack of adequate mechanical preparation of the colon. Although our experience indicates that intraoperative lavage and primary anastomosis can be employed safely in the treatment of inflammatory disorders of the colon, it is not recommended in the presence of fecal peritonitis, a large contiguous pelvic abscess, or systemic sepsis. In these individuals, the additional operating time required for intraoperative lavage and the potential consequences of anastomotic dehiscence pose too great a risk.

Elective resection for diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon

From 1966 to 1987, 177 consecutive patients were operated on electively for diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. The indications for surgery were: colovesical fistula (n = 12), suspicion of residual abscess (n = 39), two or more previous attacks of acute inflammation (n = 52), chronic symptoms (n = 72) and suspicion of carcinoma (n = 2). An abscess was found at operation in 76 patients (43 per cent) and this was extracolic with local peritonitis in 52 patients (29 per cent). An unsuspected abscess was found in 25 of the 72 patients operated on for chronic symptoms. Colonic resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 95 per cent of the 177 patients and in 94 per cent of those 52 patients with an extracolic abscess. There were no postoperative deaths and no clinical anastomotic leakages. Long-term results were very good in 85 per cent of the 177 patients and in 82 per cent of the 72 patients operated on for chronic symptoms. The results of this series suggest that a one-stage procedure can be safely performed with some technical precautions in most patients operated on electively for diverticular disease, even if an extracolic abscess is found. The good long-term results in patients operated on for chronic symptoms suggest that such symptoms should be taken into account with respect to surgical indications.

Principles and limitations of operative management of intraabdominal infections

Operative management of intraabdominal infections still rests on the principles of elimination of focus, reduction of contamination of the peritoneal cavity, and treatment of residual infection. To control the source of contamination from a perforated viscus primary closure, exclusion or resection may be considered with respect to the severity of peritonitis and to the underlying disease. The principle of "peritoneal toilet" with complementary use of systemic and/or local antibiotics is generally accepted even if the value of aggressive debridement is still debated controversely. For the treatment of residual and the prevention of recurrent infection, closed and open lavage techniques, the left-open abdomen, and planned relaparotomy represent the major approaches in severe generalized peritonitis when the infectious focus might not be securely controlled. The values and disadvantages of different regimens are discussed, additional measures are briefly described, and an outlook on areas of further research is given.

Reassessment of primary resection of the perforated segment for severe colonic diverticulitis

Primary resection with colostomy has been widely adopted during the past decade for the treatment of patients with severe complications of diverticulitis. Because of this, a retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing surgery for colonic diverticular disease during the two time periods 1974 to 1978 (n = 196) and 1982 to 1986 (n = 230). Forty-three patients had abscess or peritonitis from 1974 to 1978, whereas 52 had these complications from 1982 to 1986. Colostomy and drainage alone were used for 31 of 43 patients (72%) from 1974 to 1978, while primary resection with colostomy was used for 39 of 52 patients (75%) from 1982 to 1986 (p less than or equal to 0.5). Despite this shift in treatment method, mortality increased from 14% in 1974 to 1978 to 19% in 1982 to 1986 (p = NS). Patients with peritonitis had identical mortalities (22%) during both intervals. Patients with abscess experienced an increase in mortality from 8% in 1974 to 1978 to 15% in 1982 to 1986 (p = NS). The widespread use of primary resection for patients with severe complications of diverticulitis appears not to have altered mortality for those with diffuse peritonitis and may have worsened the outcome for those with abscess.

[Prognostic factors for survival in perforated colonic diverticulitis]

In a retrospective study we attempted to find prognostic factors for the mortality in perforated colonic diverticulitis. All patients of the First Surgical Department of Vienna University from 1965-1986 with complicated diverticulitis were included in this study. 47 patients had a perforated diverticulitis with a local abscess or a generalized peritonitis. In 35 patients a resection, in 12 patients a faecal diversion was performed. The mortality was 27%. A marked influence of age and preoperative complications on the prognosis was shown statistically. The operative procedure seems of secondary importance for operative mortality.

Diverticular disease

Although most often clinically silent, colonic diverticula are responsible for a large number of gastrointestinal illnesses in our society. Complications of diverticular disease, including perforation and hemorrhage, may occur in 15% to 20% of patients with diverticula during their lifetime, and although often mild and self-limiting diseases, they too frequently cause life-threatening problems that require prompt surgical intervention. Despite a cadre of sophisticated laboratory and radiologic tests that have been developed to aid in the diagnosis of complicated diverticular disease, the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis still relies heavily on patient history, physical examination, physician judgment, and the patient's clinical response to treatment. Thus it is important for the managing physician to fully understand the pathogenesis of diverticula, the clinical consequences and modes of presentation of complicated diverticular disease, and the array of interventions available for treatment of these problems. This monograph summarizes our knowledge of diverticular disease to date and tries to give specific guidelines for the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis. However, it must be understood that the presentation and severity of these complications vary widely from patient to patient. Thus one cannot take a single approach toward a patient who has diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding. Rather, successful outcomes depend on an individual approach to each patient while maintaining certain generally accepted principles of treatment.

Safe resection for diverticular disease of the colon

A retrospective study of 83 patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease over two years at a colorectal specialty hospital was undertaken to assess the safety of resection. No patient had free perforation. Eighty-nine percent of 46 patients with neither abscess nor fistula underwent resection and primary anastomosis, the remainder undergoing other resectional therapy; there was no mortality in this group. Of the 37 patients with abscesses, fistulas, or both, all had resections with or without primary anastomoses and one of these 37 patients died (2.7 percent mortality). In the entire series of 83 patients, the operative mortality was 1.2 percent, although 69 percent had morbidity. Resection can be performed safely for diverticulitis, and primary anastomosis can be safely added in uncomplicated and selected complicated cases.

Surgical options in acute diverticulitis: value of sigmoid resection in dealing with the septic focus

The outcome of 78 patients hospitalized with acute diverticulitis was analysed to determine the indications for emergency operation and to examine the safety of sigmoid resection. Forty patients improved on medical therapy, but four relapsed soon after discharge. Forty-two (55%) patients had emergency operations for non-resolution of clinical sepsis (25), persistent symptoms or mass (14) and fistula (three). Operations performed were: sigmoid resection and primary anastomosis (23) with covering colostomy (six). Hartmann's operation (10), drainage with/without colostomy (seven) and right hemicolectomy (two). Findings at operation were: abscess (19), phlegmon (14), generalized peritonitis (six), colovesical fistula (three) and chronic diverticulitis (three). Complications included wound infections (six), respiratory complications (five) and one death. Six patients having drainage of the sigmoid inflammation alone as the first operation required subsequent resection, with prolonged and often complicated hospitalization. Minimal morbidity and shorter hospitalization were achieved when sigmoid resection was performed at the initial procedure.

Epididymitis--an unusual presentation of colovesical fistula secondary to diverticulitis. Report of a case

A case of colovesical fistula secondary to diverticulitis that had the unusual presentation of epididymitis is presented. The current literature on diverticulitis involving the urinary tract is reviewed.

Acute colonic diverticulitis

Colonic diverticulosis is truly a disease of the 20th century. A direct correlation is thought to exist between the incidence of diverticular disease and the amount of dietary fiber. Acute colonic diverticulitis occurs in approximately 25 per cent of the patients with diverticula, and 20 per cent of the patients with diverticulitis will ultimately require surgical intervention. Because of the often virulent nature of the disease in younger patients and the prevalence in the geriatric population, an aggressive approach is advocated. Primary resection of the involved segment of colon is advocated in all cases requiring operation. A primary anastomosis can be constructed in stage I and some cases of stage II disease. This results in lower morbidity and mortality rates as well as fewer days of hospitalization and disability. Newer techniques such as diagnostic CT scanning, percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscess, and greater application of surgical stapling devices have done much to improve the ultimate outcome of colonic diverticulitis.

Implications of emergency operations on the colon

The records of 137 patients undergoing elective colonic operations and 45 patients requiring emergency large bowel operations were reviewed. The mortality rate was 37.8 percent after emergency operations compared with 5.1 percent after elective operations (p less than 0.001). Patient age was not a significant prognostic variable although physiologic status of the patient had a high correlation with both morbidity and mortality. Complications followed 86.7 percent of the emergency operations and 57.7 percent of the elective operations (p less than 0.001). Respiratory failure, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and cardiac events more frequently followed emergency colonic operations. Intraabdominal complications developed after 57.8 percent of the emergency operations compared with 29.9 percent of the elective operations (p less than 0.005). Colonic resection and primary anastomosis in the elective setting was associated with a 7.9 percent mortality rate. A large bowel anastomosis during an emergency operation resulted in a 70 percent mortality rate (p less than 0.001). When emergency colonic operation included creation of a colostomy the mortality rate was 34.4 percent. Although this mortality rate was substantial, it was significantly better than the 70 percent rate that followed attempted anastomosis under unfavorable circumstances (p less than 0.02).

An ideal operation for diverticulitis of the colon

A review has been made of the records of 208 patients operated on for complications of diverticulitis of the colon. One hundred forty patients had emergency operations and 68, elective operations. Resection and anastomosis, with or without temporary diverting colostomy, practiced in the majority of emergency cases in the earlier years covered in this review, has been replaced in the past 10 years by resection without anastomosis. Transverse colostomy, first carried out as part of a three-stage procedure, has been partially replaced by descending colostomy in the past few years. A comparison of the findings at exploration in patient who underwent resection, anastomosis, and temporary transverse colostomy with the findings in those who had the Hartmann procedure showed a slightly higher incidence of free perforation or abscess in those who had the former procedure. The hospital stay was similar in the two groups, but time in the operating room and days of disability were much less in the resection group. Only 14 of the 23 patients who survived the Hartmann procedure underwent restoration of continuity, whereas all of those in the resection group did. Follow-up of the patients who had descending colostomy showed that only 6 of 11 surviving patients underwent resection and anastomosis, but that inflammation regularly subsided, and all those with continent sphincters under age 80 eventually had restoration of continuity. This is in contrast to a more than 20 percent incidence of permanent stomas in the transverse colostomy group, all of which were in patients under age 70.

Complications of diverticular disease of the colon in young people

Diverticular disease of the colon in patients under the age of 40 years is uncommon. Between 1975 and 1985, 58 patients (31 men and 27 women) were admitted for pathologically or radiographically proven acute diverticulitis. Seventeen (29.3 percent) were younger than 40 years. Fifteen of the 17 (88.2 percent) required urgent or emergent surgery for complications of diverticular disease. This represents a significantly (P less than 0.02) larger proportion of that age group than those patients older than the age of 40 (17/41 or 41.5 percent). Twelve of the patients younger than age 40 (70.6 percent) had had their symptoms for 72 hours or less, and in 13, surgery was required during the first attack. Indications for surgery included abscess, perforation, and persistence of symptoms. Six patients required surgery in less than 24 hours. In young people, the initial attack of colonic diverticulitis is frequently severe, often requiring an urgent operation for complications. Excellent results with few complications can be obtained when the index of suspicion is high, an early diagnosis is made, and timely surgical intervention is employed.

Perforated diverticulitis in a Hartmann rectal pouch

The Hartmann procedure is the surgical treatment of choice for perforated diverticulitis. Modifications leaving a long rectal pouch or mucous fistula and a variable length of bowel that contains inactive diverticula have been described. A steroid-dependent patient presented with perforated diverticulitis in residual disease in the Hartmann rectal pouch ten months after initial sigmoid resection for a perforated diverticulum. Because steroid-treated patients are at high risk for complications and recurrent disease, all diseased bowel should be resected during the initial procedure.

Perforation of the colon in renal homograft recipients. A report of 11 cases and a review of the literature

Colon perforation in renal transplant recipients is a potentially lethal condition that is amenable to appropriate medical and surgical treatment. The 11 cases seen at the Cleveland Clinic (incidence 1.1% of all renal transplant patients) and previous reports in the literature have been reviewed. The pathogenesis is related to a high incidence of diverticular disease in patients with polycystic kidneys and/or chronic renal failure, the effects of long-term immunosuppression, and the transplant procedure itself. The high mortality of this condition (61% overall) is related to the effects of immunosuppression on the response to sepsis and the surgical procedure used. Mortality has fallen from 88% (1970-1974) to 53% (1975-1979), and there are indications that it is continuing to fall. All four cases operated on here since 1980 have survived, giving a total operative mortality of 2/6, and all have maintained excellent allograft function. A high clinical index of suspicion, prompt exteriorization of the perforated colon, reduction of immunosuppression to minimal levels, and effective antibiotic coverage have all contributed to the declining mortality.

Antiseptic vs. saline lavage in purulent and faecal peritonitis

A prospective randomized trial compared antiseptic solutions and normal saline as a means of preventing morbidity and mortality from residual sepsis in patients with generalized peritonitis. Fifty-three patients, all given broad-spectrum antibiotics, were entered into the study. Twenty patients received a saline lavage, 19 lavage with chlorhexidine-gluconate and 14 a saline lavage with instillation of povidone-iodine. All deaths were due either to the severity of the presenting disease or co-existing complicating conditions. The incidence of postoperative pyrexia, wound infection and duration of hospital stay of the surviving patients were unaffected by lavage grouping.

Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: a review

There is little uniformity in either the indications for operation, the classification of the pathology or the operative management of generalized or faecal peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticular disease. Nevertheless, this review has shown a clear advantage both in terms of immediate mortality and morbidity for primary resection over conservative operations in which the colon is retained in the abdomen. We propose that, when a clinical diagnosis of localized sepsis secondary to diverticular disease is made, the management should be nonoperative with systemic antibiotics and supportive therapy. Operation should be reserved for those patients with obvious generalized peritonitis or failure of conservative treatment. When operation is necessary the affected sigmoid loop should be resected and the operation completed as a Hartmann's procedure in all but the most favourable circumstances when a primary anastomosis may be considered after on-table irrigation of the colon.

Acute diverticulitis. Comparison of treatment in immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised patients

The clinical course and required treatment of diverticulitis were reviewed in 76 nonimmunocompromised patients and 10 immunocompromised patients. The immunocompromised patients presented with either minimal or no symptoms and findings. Therefore, to make the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in this group, a high index of suspicion must be maintained. The required treatment varied considerably between the two groups. In 45 nonimmunocompromised patients (76 percent), medical therapy was successful. Medical treatment failed in the other 14 patients (24 percent). However, the compromised group had no patients in whom medical therapy was successful (100 percent failure rate). Thirty-one of the nonimmunocompromised patients (41 percent) required an operation, whereas 100 percent of the immunocompromised patients with acute diverticulitis required an operation. By relating postoperative complications, we were unable to determine the initial operative procedure of choice in the nonimmunocompromised group; however, in the immunocompromised group, colostomy and resection had fewer surgical complications than colostomy and drainage. The immunocompromised patient with acute diverticulitis requires operation. We believe the operation of choice is colostomy and resection of the involved segment.

Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of diverticular disease

This paper includes a brief historic summary of the surgical aspects of diverticular disease and of corresponding developments in the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1911 to the present. The 350 cases observed in 1974-1983 are compared with 338 seen in the previous decade. Major trends include a decrease in hospital admissions for diverticular disease but a sustained number of operations; increased severity of the disease in hospitalized patients manifested by an increased percentage of patients with immunosuppression or serious other diseases (p less than 0.001), an increased number with sepsis and general peritonitis (p less than 0.001); an increased percentage of cases with one-stage resection and anastomosis (p less than 0.02); in patients with general peritonitis, resection of the perforated segment at the time of the original operation was accompanied by the lowest mortality (p less than 0.02); incidental splenectomy appears to be dangerous, with three deaths in eight cases; and overall mortality in the last decade is 6.4%; for emergency cases 10.2%, for urgent 9.7%, and for elective cases 2.4%.

Modified Hartmann procedure in emergency sigmoid colectomy

A new technique has been added to the Hartmann procedure to suture the rectal stump to the presacral fascia using black silk sutures at the time of the initial resection and closure of rectal stump. This will prevent contraction of the rectal stump behind the bladder or vagina deep in the pelvis and makes reanastomosis of the proximal colon to the rectal stump very easy. Also discussed are the advantages of the modified Hartmann procedure in cases of emergency sigmoid colectomy as opposed to the conventional three stage procedure.

Surgical management of diverticulitis. The role of the Hartmann procedure

Presented is the authors' experience with 182 patients treated primarily by the one-stage primary resection or two-stage resection. (Hartmann operation). One hundred thirty five patients undergoing primary resection had an associated mortality rate of 2.2 per cent. Of 44 patients operated upon using the Hartmann operation for complicated diverticulitis (obstruction, perforation, abscess formation, or fistula formation) the mortality rate was 4.5 per cent. Primary resection in an elective setting is associated with the lowest mortality and morbidity; however, marked inflammation, obstruction and/or peritonitis preclude primary anastomosis. In the urgent setting the staged operation is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Management of diverticulitis of the ascending colon. 10 years' experience

Diverticulitis of the ascending colon is an uncommon disease which mimics appendicitis. The correct diagnosis is rarely made, but can be suggested by the patterns of signs and symptoms and confirmed by barium contrast study. Diverticulitis of the ascending colon should be treated by the same plan as diverticulitis of the left colon. If the diagnosis is established, nonoperative management is indicated initially. Operation is indicated when the diagnosis is in doubt, when perforation has occurred, or when the patient does not respond to nonoperative treatment. At operation, ascending colon diverticulitis can be recognized as an inflammatory mass involving the wall and mesentery of the colon. The inflammatory mass is best treated by resection with primary anastomosis of the ileum to the ascending or transverse colon in an area removed from the site of infection.

Changing concepts in diverticular disease

Conventionally, acquired diverticular disease of the colon has been regarded as a single entity, so far as complications go. Experience at St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, suggests that there are two kinds of diverticular disease, one with the classic muscle abnormality, chiefly confined to the left colon and characterized by inflammatory and perforative complications and the other without muscle abnormality, but with diverticula throughout the colon, in which bleeding is common, perhaps due to a connective-tissue abnormality which, on the one hand, allows development of diverticula in the absence of abnormal intraluminal pressure and, on the other, provides inadequate support for vessels in the diverticular wall or for vascular malformations, which are therefore likely to bleed. Clinical evidence from admissions to St. Vincent's Hospital suggests that both acute and chronic pain may be either inflammatory or associated with muscle spasm and hypertrophy. Finally, there is some evidence to suggest that perforation may be due often, or usually, to abnormal intraluminal pressures rather than to diverticular inflammation.

The Hartmann procedure

During a 10-year period, 59 patients had a Hartmann operation for diverticular disease (n = 19), carcinoma (n = 21), anastomotic disruption (n = 5), injury (n = 3) and various other conditions (n = 11). Twenty-two patients (37.3 per cent) died postoperatively. Wound infection or wound dehiscence occurred in 26 patients. Other complications inherent in this operation were colostomy necrosis or retraction (n = 12) and leakage of the rectal stump (n = 3). The mean hospital stay of the surviving patients was 28.4 days. Colorectal continuity was subsequently restored in 12 patients (32.4 per cent) and no difficulties were encountered with this procedure.

Loop transverse colostomy. The case against

All large-bowel stomas (198) performed between 1970 and 1980 in a community hospital were reviewed. Twenty-nine stomas were loop transverse colostomies. There were five deaths, a complication rate related to the stoma of 28 per cent, and only 18 patients ever achieved colostomy closure. Our conclusions are as follows: (1) transverse colostomy is a holdover from the past; (2) "temporary" loop colostomy is a misnomer; (3) all colostomies should be end-bearing and matured primarily; (4) blind surgery invites tragedy; (5) loop transverse colostomy is a risky first stage with little benefit; (6) every colostomy should be placed as near as possible to the disease process; and (7) resection of the disease is the ideal first stage.

Acute perforation of sigmoid diverticula

Forty patients underwent operative therapy for acute perforation of colonic diverticula. The group I patients had some localization of infection, group II had generalized feculent-purulent contamination with free perforation, and group III had free perforation and were treated with chronic steroids for various medical disorders. The retrospective evaluation was directed at evaluating the effect on survival of methods to treat the hole in the colon and methods to treat peritoneal contamination. It is concluded that control of the perforation in the bowel and aggressive peritoneal irrigation may decrease the high morbidity and mortality rates.

Surgical management of perforated diverticulitis

The surgical management of perforated diverticulitis remains a subject of controversy, with some workers advocating initial drainage with decompressive colostomy and others favoring primary resection of the perforated colon. To evaluate this problem, we reviewed our experience from January 1, 1960 through December 31, 1978. This retrospective study included 25 patients treated by primary resection and 32 patients treated by staged resection. The duration of postoperative fever and ileus and the incidence and type of postoperative complications were similar in the two groups. Hospital stay and the period of disability were significantly shortened when primary resection with primary anastomosis was carried out initially. Overall, the total cumulative hospital stay was long (p < 0.05) for staged resection (48 days) than for primary resection (39 days). The period of disability was also longer (p < 0.001) for staged (134 days) than for primary resection (75 days). Finally, all patients in the primary resection group left the hospital cured, that is, restored to their premorbid condition, while in the staged resection group only 75 percent were cured; 16 percent were finally discharged with colostomies and 9 percent died. These data suggest that whenever technically feasible, primary resection is the treatment of choice for perforated colonic diverticulitis.

Surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon

A retrospective review of 1353 cases of acute perforated sigmoid diverticulitis treated surgically demonstrates that those operations that resect or exteriorize the perforated segment at the first operation are associated with a lower operative mortality rate than procedures that fail to remove the perforated segment at the initial operation. These results are true for both diffuse peritonitis and localized abscess.

The management of perforated diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis

In a ten-year period 53 patients presented with perforated colonic diverticular disease with diffuse peritonitis. Eight patients died--all with uncontrolled intraabdominal sepsis. Various surgical techniques were employed. None of the 12 patients having immediate resection of the affected bowel segment died. There was no mortality from subsequent operations in any form of staged treatment. Primary resection without anastomosis is supported as the treatment of choice for this condition.