Effects of intraoperative plasmapheresis on blood loss in cardiac surgery

2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines reflect published literature. Because of the ever changing literature base, it is necessary to update and revise guideline recommendations from time to time. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommends review and possible update of previously published guidelines at least every three years. This summary is an update of the blood conservation guideline published in 2007.

METHODS

The search methods used in the current version differ compared to the previously published guideline. Literature searches were conducted using standardized MeSH terms from the National Library of Medicine PUBMED database list of search terms. The following terms comprised the standard baseline search terms for all topics and were connected with the logical 'OR' connector--Extracorporeal circulation (MeSH number E04.292), cardiovascular surgical procedures (MeSH number E04.100), and vascular diseases (MeSH number C14.907). Use of these broad search terms allowed specific topics to be added to the search with the logical 'AND' connector.

RESULTS

In this 2011 guideline update, areas of major revision include: 1) management of dual anti-platelet therapy before operation, 2) use of drugs that augment red blood cell volume or limit blood loss, 3) use of blood derivatives including fresh frozen plasma, Factor XIII, leukoreduced red blood cells, platelet plasmapheresis, recombinant Factor VII, antithrombin III, and Factor IX concentrates, 4) changes in management of blood salvage, 5) use of minimally invasive procedures to limit perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion, 6) recommendations for blood conservation related to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary perfusion, 7) use of topical hemostatic agents, and 8) new insights into the value of team interventions in blood management.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has changed since the previously published 2007 STS blood management guidelines and this document contains new and revised recommendations.

Platelet-rich-plasmapheresis for minimising peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have generated considerable enthusiasm for the use of technologies intended to reduce the use of allogeneic blood (blood from an unrelated donor). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis (PRP) offers an alternative approach to blood conservation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of PRP in reducing peri-operative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes such as mortality and re-operation rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified studies by searching MEDLINE (1950 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), the Internet (to March 2009) and the reference lists of published articles, reports, and reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to PRP, or to a control group which did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes measured were: the number of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion, and the amount of RBC transfused. Other outcomes measured were: the number of patients exposed to allogeneic platelet transfusions, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, post-operative complications (thrombosis), mortality, and length of hospital stay. Treatment effects were pooled using a random-effects model. Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al (Schulz 1995).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials of PRP were identified that reported data for the number of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion. These trials evaluated a total of 1589 patients. The relative risk (RR) of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion in those patients randomised to PRP was 0.73 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.90), equating to a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 27% and a risk difference (RD) of 19% (95%CI 10% to 29%). However, significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed (p < 0.00001; I² = 79%). When the four trials by Boldt are excluded, the RR is 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.93). On average, PRP did not significantly reduce the total volume of RBC transfused (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.69, 95%CI -1.93 to 0.56 units). Trials provided inadequate data regarding the impact of PRP on morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay. Trials were generally small and of poor methodological quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the results suggest that PRP is effective in reducing allogeneic RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing elective surgery, there was considerable heterogeneity of treatment effects and the trials were of poor methodological quality. The available studies provided inadequate data for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the impact of PRP on clinically important endpoints.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Platelet-rich-plasmapheresis for minimising peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have generated considerable enthusiasm for the use of technologies intended to reduce the use of allogeneic blood (blood from an unrelated donor). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis (PRP) offers an alternative approach to blood conservation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of PRP in reducing peri-operative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes such as mortality and re-operation rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified by: computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library (to June 2001). These searches were supplemented by checking the reference lists of published articles, reports, and reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to PRP, or to a control group who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Main outcomes measured were: the number of patients receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion, and the amount of RBC transfused. Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al. (Schulz 1995) and Jadad et al. (Jadad 1996).

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen trials of PRP were identified that reported data for the number of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion. These trials evaluated a total of 1452 patients. The pooled relative risk (RR) of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion in those patients randomised to PRP was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.56, 0.90), equating to a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 29%; the average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 19% (RD = -0.19: 95%CI: -0.29, -0.09). On average, PRP did not significantly reduce the total volume of RBC transfused (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.69: 95%CI: -1.93, 0.56 units). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed (p < 0.001). Trials provided inadequate data regarding the impact of PRP on morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay. The majority of trials were small and of poor methodological quality.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although the results suggest that PRP is effective in reducing allogeneic RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing elective surgery, there was considerable heterogeneity in treatment effects and the trials were of poor methodological quality. As the majority of trials were unblinded, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patient's allocation status, potentially exaggerating the true magnitude of the beneficial effect of PRP. The available studies provided inadequate data for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the impact of PRP on clinically important endpoints.

Platelet pheresis is not a useful adjunct to blood-sparing strategies in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether specific platelet pheresis (minimal plasma harvested) would contribute toward reduced blood loss and allogenic blood requirements after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

A large cardiothoracic surgical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Consenting patients undergoing routine coronary artery or valve surgery (n = 54).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the pheresis group underwent platelet pheresis in the anesthetic preparation room before general anesthesia. Pheresed platelets were stored during cardiopulmonary bypass and were returned to the patients after reversal of heparin with protamine toward the end of surgery. Control patients underwent their operations without this intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary endpoints were blood loss and transfusion requirements. There were no differences between the 2 groups (pheresis v control: median loss, 960 mL v 1100 mL, p = 0.15; median blood transfused, 896 mL v 635 mL, p = 0.71). Secondary endpoints included analysis of platelet counts, platelet function, and surface markers. Counts remained the same after retransfusion of platelets up to 2 hours after surgery. Platelet aggregation to ristocetin was well preserved, but adenosine diphosphate caused almost no aggregation of the harvested platelets. Flow cytometry revealed the platelets to have a reduced surface density of the glycoprotein 1b receptor, and 13% of them were irreversibly activated.

CONCLUSION

Platelet pheresis activates a proportion of the harvested platelets and impairs the function of the remainder; this may explain its failure to reduce postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Intraoperative use of platelet-plasmapheresis in vascular surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine, in a pilot study, whether pheresis of plasma and platelets before surgical blood loss, with reinfusion of the autologous plasma and platelets after completion of the aortic reconstruction, will result in decreased bleeding and decreased transfusion of allogenic blood components in patients undergoing elective aortic reconstruction.

DESIGN

Randomized study.

SETTING

University medical center.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to perioperative (acute) platelet plasmapheresis (APP group) versus conventional blood component therapy (control group). In the APP group, blood was withdrawn after induction of anesthesia, to sequester approximately 300 mL of platelet rich plasma (PRP); platelet poor plasma (PPP) and red blood cells (RBC) were sequestered as well. An autotransfusion device was used to collect and re-infuse autologous RBC during the course of the operation in both groups. After completion of the aortic reconstruction, autologous PRP and PPP were re-infused in the APP group. Blood loss, volume of blood component transfusions, and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), platelet, international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was no difference between groups in demographics, preoperative laboratory values, or surgical procedures, although more patients were treated for aneurysms (73% vs. 60%) and fewer for occlusive disease (20% vs. 40%) in the control versus APP group. Also, there were no differences between the control and APP groups in duration of operation, blood loss, volume of colloid infused, or volume of allogenic RBC and plasma transfused. Patients in the APP group received a greater volume of crystalloid solution (9.1 +/- 3.4 L vs. 6.8 +/- 3.0 L; p = 0.002), but fewer units of allogenic platelets than the control group (0.7 +/- 1.0 units vs. 0.2 +/- 0.4 units; p < 0.04). There were no differences in postoperative Hb, Hct, INR, aPTT, or fibrinogen. The platelet count was lower in the APP group than in the control group (123 +/- 40 x 10(3)/mm(3) vs. 182 +/- 51 x 10(3)/mm(3); p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative platelet plasmapheresis led to fewer allogenic platelet transfusions in patients undergoing elective aortic reconstruction. However, there was no decrease in blood loss and no reduction in transfusion of allogenic RBC or plasma. Perioperative platelet plasmapheresis is not recommended for routine use in elective aortic reconstruction.

Intraoperative plateletpheresis and autologous platelet gel do not reduce chest tube drainage or allogeneic blood transfusion after reoperative coronary artery bypass graft

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is postulated to decrease postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD) and allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, recent metaanalysis of the literature reveals that few good quality (therapeutic yield) trials that show a benefit have been published. The potential hemodynamic instability caused by plateletpheresis has not been emphasized. We studied the effect of plateletpheresis on MCTD, ABT, and hemodynamic stability in reoperative coronary artery bypass graft patients, a group perceived to be at high risk for ABT. Ninety patients were randomly assigned to Pheresis or Control groups. epsilon-Aminocaproic acid was given to all patients. Hemodynamic instability was assessed by degree of volume and inotrope resuscitation required. Part of the sequestered platelet volume was used to make autologous platelet gel, which was applied as a wound sealant. Mean pheresis yield was 30% +/- 7% of the circulating platelet mass or 6.4 +/- 2.2 allogeneic platelet unit equivalents. Total MCTD did not differ between the groups. There were no differences in mean packed red blood cell, platelet, and plasma transfusion rates. Overall, 52% of the Pheresis group received ABT, versus 55% of the Control group. Fifty-three percent of the Pheresis group patients exhibited significant hemodynamic instability, versus 27% of the Control group (P < 0.05). This study was unable to show any reduction in MCTD or ABT, although the plateletpheresis technique may offset platelet dysfunction caused by aspirin or increased blood exposure to nonbiologic surfaces, or it may compensate for lack of antifibrinolytic use. The significantly increased incidence of hemodynamic instability in the Pheresis group means that the risk/benefit ratio must be determined for individual cardiac surgical units.

Autotransfusion in cardiac surgery

There are a number of problems with allogeneic blood transfusion. Some of these problems are defined and can be quantified, such as the problem of rising cost or the risk of viral infection, but some of the problems are not well defined and it is only outcome data that point to allogeneic blood transfusion contributing to patient mortality and morbidity. Autotransfusion includes any technique in which the patient's own blood is collected, processed and stored, followed by reinfusion when circumstances dictate. In the perioperative period of cardiac surgery, a number of techniques are recognized as useful in this context. Preoperative autologous donation, with or without erythropoietin supplementation, intraoperative acute normovolaemic haemodilution, intraoperative cell salvage, postoperative cell salvage (reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood) and platelet rich plasmapheresis are all techniques which are used with more or less enthusiasm to reduce the need for an allogeneic blood transfusion. Modification of the priming technique of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit using an autologous blood prime is included in this review even though it does not fall strictly within the definition of autotransfusion. Although autotransfusion is not the answer to every problem, there is no doubt that it should play a significant part in the strategy of blood conservation.

Comparison of the effects of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin on blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing valve surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 important techniques of blood conservation, use of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin, in terms of blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty adult patients undergoing elective valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were divided into 3 groups of 20 each. In group 1, aprotinin in the dose of 30,000 KIU/kg was added to the pump prime, with a further dose of 15,000 KIU/kg added at the end of each hour of cardiopulmonary bypass. In group 2, a cell-saver system was used to collect all blood at the operation site for processing in preparation for subsequent reinfusion. Group 3 patients acted as a control group and underwent routine management, which included collection of autologous blood during the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass period. A hemoglobin of <8 g/dL was considered as an indication for bank blood transfusion in the postoperative period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The chest tube drainage was significantly less in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3, with total drainage (median [interquartile range]) amounting to 250 mL [105 to 325 mL] vs. 700 mL [525 to 910 mL] in group 2 and 800 mL [650 to 880 mL] in group 3 (p < 0.001). The patients in groups 1 and 2 required significantly less bank blood (median [interquartile range]) as compared with group 3 (350 mL [0 to 525 mL], 350 mL [0 to 350 mL], and 1050 mL [875 to 1050 mL]; p < 0.001), respectively. Cell saver provided 410 +/- 130 mL of hemoconcentrated blood in group 2. The average preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 11.3 g/dL, and it was around 9 g/dL on the 7th postoperative day. The hemoglobin concentration at various stages during hospitalization in all 3 groups was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin and a cell saver are effective and comparable methods of blood conservation. Aprotinin helps by decreasing the postoperative drainage, and a cell saver helps by making the patient's own blood available for transfusion.

Platelet-rich plasma sequestration, with therapeutic platelet yields, reduces allogeneic transfusion in complex cardiac surgery

Platelet dysfunction is the most common cause of nonsurgical bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We hypothesized that reinfusion of a therapeutic quantity of platelets sequestered before CPB would decrease the need for allogeneic platelet transfusion, as well as decrease bleeding and total allogeneic transfusion, in cardiac surgery patients at moderately high risk for bleeding. Fifty-five patients undergoing either reoperative coronary artery bypass (CABG) or combined CABG and valve replacement were randomized to control or platelet-rich plasma sequestration (pheresis) groups. All patients received intraoperative epsilon-aminocaproic acid infusions. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to preoperative characteristics, duration of CPB, or target postoperative hematocrit. Mean platelet yields were 6.2 +/- 2.1 units (3.1 x 10(11) platelets). Mean pheresis time was 44 min. Allogeneic platelets (range = 6-12 units) were transfused to 28% of control patients, compared with 0% of pheresis patients (P < 0.01). Allogeneic packed red blood cells were transfused to 45% of control patients (1.2 units per patient) versus 31% of pheresis patients (0. 7 unit per patient) (P = 0.35). Total allogeneic units transfused were significantly reduced in the pheresis group (P < 0.02). Mediastinal chest tube drainage was not significantly decreased in the pheresis group. In this prospective, randomized study, therapeutic platelet yields were obtained before CPB. In contrast with recent studies with low platelet yields, these data support the conclusion that platelet-rich plasma sequestration is effective in reducing allogeneic platelet transfusions and total allogeneic units transfused in cardiac surgery patients at moderately high risk for post-CPB coagulopathy and bleeding.

IMPLICATIONS

Transfusion of allogeneic blood products, including platelets, is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In the present prospective, randomized study, a significant reduction in allogeneic platelet transfusion and total allogeneic units transfused was observed after the reinfusion of a therapeutic quantity of autologous platelets sequestered before cardiopulmonary bypass.

Platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of the effect on transfusion requirements

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine whether intraoperative platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery is effective in reducing the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusions.

METHODS

A systematic search for prospective, randomized trials of platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery, using MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, Current Contents, "Biological Abstracts," and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica up to August 1997, was completed. Trials were included if they reported either the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cells or the units of allogeneic red cells transfused. Trials were abstracted by 2 independent investigators and the quality of trial design was assessed with the use of a validated scale.

RESULTS

Seventeen references met the inclusion criteria (1369 patients [675 control: 694 platelet-rich plasmapheresis]). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis reduced the likelihood of exposure to allogeneic red cells in cardiac surgery (odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.27, 0.72, P = .001). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis had a small but statistically significant effect on both the volume of blood lost in the first 24 hours (weighted mean difference -102 mL; 95% confidence interval -148, -55 mL, P < .0001) and the mean units transfused (weighted mean difference -0.33 units; 95% confidence interval -0.43, -0.23, P < .0001). However, platelet-rich plasmapheresis was only marginally effective (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.34, 2.01, P = .68) for "good" quality trials, whereas it appeared very effective in trials with poor methodologic quality (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.17, 0.62, P = .0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Although platelet-rich plasmapheresis appeared effective in decreasing the proportion of patients receiving transfusions after cardiac operations, the quality of most of the supporting trials was low and the benefit was small in trials of good quality. Further clinical trials should be completed.

Effect of aspirin in coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of aspirin (ASA) therapy on postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, reoperation for bleeding, duration of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital in a selected population undergoing a first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study in consecutive patients during a 3-month period.

SETTING

A teaching cardiothoracic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for the first time.

INTERVENTIONS

Two hundred forty consecutive patients admitted for a first CABG the day before surgery were visited. patients with an abnormal routine coagulation screen or taking drugs that might have affected their coagulation mechanisms were prospectively excluded (n = 96). The date of the last dose of ASA was recorded in the 144 remaining patients, and data were acquired prospectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Total mediastinal blood drainage, blood products usage, reopening, and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay were recorded. Patients were grouped by days free of ASA. There were no significant differences detected between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing a first CABG and with no known factors affecting their coagulation, ASA therapy did not appear to increase blood loss, reopening for bleeding, or blood products usage requirements during the hospital stay. ASA therapy did not influence the duration of stay in intensive care or in the hospital.

Preoperative autologous blood donation and plateletpheresis in patients undergoing elective cardiac operations--factors that influence the need for homologous blood transfusion

An increased awareness of the adverse effects of homologous blood transfusion prompted us to initiate a blood conservation program consisting of preoperative autologous blood donation and platelet-rich plasma-pheresis. We studied 120 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery at Aomori General Hospital between January 1991 and September 1994. If their hemoglobin values exceeded 12 g/ml, 400 g of whole blood was drawn 3 times before the operation. Platelet-poor plasma was collected 10 days before the operation and platelet-rich plasma was collected the day before the operation. However, despite participation in this program, 42 of 120 patients (35%) required homologous blood transfusion perioperatively. Factors that influenced the need for homologous blood transfusion were identified retrospectively, with the following found to be significant by univariate analysis: operative procedures performed, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and the amount of autologous blood and autologous plasma donated. Although the effectiveness of our blood conservation procedure remains to be verified, it reduced the need for the transfusion of homologous blood. Thus, additional units of autologous blood are required to obviate the need for homologous transfusion in patients undergoing long cardiopulmonary bypass procedures.

Intraoperative plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of intraoperative plasmapheresis on total transfusion requirements, mediastinal drainage, and coagulation.

DESIGN

The trial was prospective, randomized, and controlled.

SETTING

Inpatient cardiac surgery at a university medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Intraoperative plasmapheresis (IP) was performed in 147 patients before heparinization; platelet-rich plasma was reinfused immediately after heparin reversal.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mediastinal chest tube drainage during the first 12 postoperative hours was significantly less in the IP group (p = 0.022), but no difference was noted in total postoperative blood loss between the two groups. The amount of packed red cells and fresh frozen plasma transfused to the IP group in the intensive care unit was significantly lower (p = 0.02, p = 0.002, respectively); 51.4% of patients required no transfusion compared with the control group (34.5%) (p = 0.006). No differences were noted for data collected in the intensive care unit in terms of the mean duration of chest tube drainage, ventilator time, or any hematologic variables at baseline or at any subsequent time in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

After cardiac surgery, intraoperative plasma-pheresis reduces early postoperative bleeding and decreases the need for homologous transfusions.

Plateletpheresis before redo CABG diminishes excessive blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Blood conservation remains an important element for patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Preoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) harvest is an autologous blood conservation method. The efficacy of preoperative PRP harvest and post-cardiopulmonary bypass reinfusion on postoperative bleeding and need for postoperative blood transfusion was evaluated in patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass grafting in a prospective, randomized manner.

METHODS

All adult patients admitted for redo coronary artery bypass grafting entered into the study. The PRP harvest aim was 20% or more of the total estimated circulating platelets. Immediately preoperatively three sequestration cycles were performed. The PRP was reinfused after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. One hundred seven parameters/patient were recorded. There were 20 patients in the RPR group and 20 controls (without PRP harvest).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics, operative data, and preoperative hematologic parameters did not differ between the groups. In the PRP group, the mean platelet count in the PRP was 864 +/- 139 x 10(3)/microL, and the platelet yield was 27% +/- 5% (range, 20% to 37%). The average total chest tube blood loss was 423 mL (PRP) compared with 1,462 mL (controls; p < 0.001). Fourteen patients in the control group required blood transfusions postoperatively compared with only 1 patient in the PRP group (p < 0.001). Postoperative fluid requirements were also significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.001). Postextubation gas exchange was significantly better in the PRP group compared with controls (p < 0.01). Postoperative ventilation time and intensive care stay were significantly shorter in patients in the PRP group.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative PRP harvest of 20% or more of the total platelets and reinfusion of the PRP after cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in significantly less postoperative blood loss and decreased fluid and blood transfusion requirements compared with controls. Postextubation gas exchange, ventilation time, and time required in the intensive care unit were also better, and the method was found cost-effective.

Intraoperative autotransfusion reduces blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

A combination of several techniques is necessary to minimize the transfusion requirements for open heart operations. The benefit of plasmapheresis remains in doubt because of smaller and less effective platelets obtained with this technique. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of whole blood intraoperative autotransfusion as part of a blood conservation protocol.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft operations were randomized to an autotransfusion group (group A) or control group (group C). Group A patients had a 10 mL/kg of whole blood removed before cardiopulmonary bypass; they had retransfusion at the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass and heparin reversal. Both groups had intraoperative cell saving and autotransfusion of shed mediastinal blood postoperatively. The indications for blood transfusion were standardized, and the physicians ordering blood products were blinded to the study.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, patients in the autotransfusion group had a 28% reduction of chest tube drainage at 8 hours and a 45% reduction in the total homologous blood units transfused.

CONCLUSIONS

Autotransfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass provides benefit in addition to other techniques in reducing blood loss and the need for blood products in the postoperative period.

Autologous platelet-rich plasmapheresis: risk versus benefit in repeat cardiac operations

Preoperative platelet-rich plasmapheresis has been suggested as a means of reducing homologous blood transfusions in cardiac surgical patients. The current study evaluated this technique in patients undergoing repeat cardiac operations. Fifty-two patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization and/or valve replacement were evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled study design. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was harvested after the induction of anesthesia in the experimental group. After reversal of heparin, each patient received his or her autologous plasma. Patients in the control group did not have plasmapheresis and received standard transfusion therapy if coagulation variables were abnormal and a coagulopathy was clinically evident. Routine coagulation tests, thromboelastography (TEG), perioperative bleeding, and transfusion requirements were compared in the two groups. Forty-four patients completed the study. A significantly larger volume of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) was transfused in the PRP group than in the control group (P = 0.03). Platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Mediastinal tube drainage did not differ between the two groups. During PRP infusion, 60% of the patients required treatment for moderate hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 60 mm Hg). Only 16% of control patients required treatment for hypotension during the comparable time period (P < 0.05). No patient who completed the study returned to the operating room for postoperative bleeding. These data suggest that PRP did not reduce postbypass bleeding or transfusion requirements in repeat cardiac surgical patients. Moreover, the incidence of hypotension during PRP reinfusion introduces a potential risk to the procedure in the absence of any obvious benefit.

Aprotinin improves hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass better than single-donor platelet concentrate

Platelet transfusion and aprotinin administration improve platelet function and clinical hemostasis after extracorporeal circulation. To compare two methods of improving postoperative hemostasis, we preoperatively randomized 40 patients undergoing various open heart procedures into two groups. Group A included 20 patients who, immediately after bypass, received single-donor plateletpheresis concentrates collected from ABO-compatible donors (Baxter Autopheresis-C System). They were compared with 20 patients who received high-dose aprotinin (6 x 10(6) KIU) before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (group B). Group A patients showed significantly higher platelet count after single-donor plateletpheresis concentrate transfusion (157 +/- 36 x 10(9)/L compared with 118 +/- 42 x 10(9)/L (p < 0.05). However, platelet aggregation on extracellular matrix was better in group B (3.4 +/- 0.7 versus 2.8 +/- 0.9; p < 0.05). Total 24-hour blood loss and exposure to homologous blood products were significantly less in group B (396 +/- 125 mL and 1.1 +/- 1.6 units compared with 617 +/- 233 mL and 5.4 +/- 3.4 units; p < 0.01). Despite higher platelet count in patients after single-donor plateletpheresis concentrates transfusion, hemostasis in patients receiving aprotinin is better due to improved platelet function.

The haemostatic effectiveness of autologous platelet rich plasma sequestered after heparin administration and institution of cardiopulmonary bypass

Preoperative harvesting and postoperative reinfusion of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been reported to decrease blood loss as well as the requirement for homologous blood transfusion following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We have developed a technique of intraoperative PRP sequestration which occurs during the initial period of CPB after the patient's circulation is supported and heparin has been given (PRP+). This process does not require any additional hardware, personnel or expense and it is performed without difficulty or complication. To evaluate the effect of PRP+ sequestration and reinfusion on blood loss and homologous blood requirement after CPB, we randomly assigned 126 consecutive patients undergoing elective open heart surgery into the experimental group 1 (PRP+) (n = 64) or the control (no platelet pheresis) group 2 (n = 52). A third group (n = 10) were not included in the randomization. Patients in group 3 had PRP prepared by conventional techniques (PRPc) prior to heparin administration and given to the patient after protamine infusion. Aggregation and activation studies were performed on the PRP+, PRPc, and blood bank platelets (BBP). Per cent aggregation of PRP in response to ADP was superior to that of BBP. There were no significant differences in ADP induced aggregation between PRP+ and PEPc. There was no significant difference in platelet activation (CD62) or number between the three groups. Patients infused with PRP+ showed significantly increased aggregation to ADP when compared with untreated patients 120 minutes after return to the ICW. Furthermore, more homologous haemostatic components (platelets/fresh frozen plasma) were required in the control group. We have demonstrated that collection of autologous PRP+ after administration of heparin does not interfere with its haemostatic effectiveness compared with PRPc prepared before the initiation of bypass. Moreover, this can be performed universally in haemodynamically unstable patients without any additional costs.

Intraoperative hemodilution and autologous platelet rich plasma collection: two techniques for collecting fresh autologous blood

Intraoperative hemodilution (IH) and autologous platelet rich plasma (APRP) collection are two techniques used to obtain autologous blood in the operating room. They have been used to reduce allogeneic blood exposure in patients undergoing both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Both components have the advantage of providing fresh blood not subject to the storage lesion. Whole blood (IH) or platelet rich plasma is removed from the patient as anesthesia is induced and replaced with acellular fluid. The blood is transfused back after bypass or major bleeding has ceased. Although used commonly, the data supporting the use of either technique are controversial. Methodologic problems which have confounded studies evaluating their utility include: poorly defined transfusion criteria, concommitant use of other blood conservation techniques (i.e. cell salvage, pharmacologic agents, hypothermia, controlled hypotension) and changing transfusion practices with greater tolerance of normovolemic anemia. Randomized controlled studies with well defined up to date transfusion criteria are needed to identify patients likely to benefit from these techniques.

[Effects of platelet-rich plasma on hemostasis and transfusion requirement in vascular surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of intraoperative autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) transfusion on haemostasis, blood loss and blood requirements during vascular surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients undergoing elective abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysmectomy, using autologous transfusion techniques (predonation programme and/or preoperative normovolaemic haemodilution and/or intraoperative use of a cell-saver), were randomly allocated either into the PRP group (n = 10) or the Control group (n = 10).

METHOD

In patients of PRP group, 10 mL.kg-1 of PRP were obtained over 40 to 50 min, prior to induction of anaesthesia, and compensated simultaneously with an equivalent amount of hydroxyethyl starch. Each PRP unit was transfused to its donor after aortic declamping. Blood samples were obtained before induction, before incision, at wound closing and at the end of PRP unit transfusion for determination of biological variables.

RESULTS

The PRP units transfused in the patients of PRP group contained 755 +/- 117 mL of plasma with a platelet count of 62 +/- 31 G.L-1. The intra and postoperative blood losses were similar in both groups (1622 +/- 758 and 233 +/- 322 mL respectively in PRP group vs 1890 +/- 1331 and 291 +/- 303 mL respectively in Control group). In both groups, three patients required an additional transfusion of homologous blood. The results of biological tests (haematocrit, platelet and white cell counts, prothrombin time, aPTT, thrombin time, fibrinogen, D-dimers, proteins, calcium) were also similar between groups at the various times of sampling. The reinfusion of the PRP unit did not increase the platelet count.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that intraoperative infusion of autologous PRP does not decrease blood loss and homologous transfusion requirements in patients undergoing elective abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysmectomy. This result can be related to the relatively moderate enrichment in platelets obtained with the centrifugation speed used in this study.

Transfusion and surgery

In this survey of transfusion in surgery, we have attempted to provide the surgeon with an understanding of the problems associated with homologous transfusion and a practical knowledge of treatment strategies and alternatives designed to reduce homologous blood exposure. Such a review cannot be encyclopedic. Our hope is that it will serve the reader as a stimulus to examine his or her transfusion practices and as a guide for future self-learning.

Autologous plateletpheresis in cardiac surgery

Despite remarkable improvement of surgical and cardiopulmonary bypass technique, nonsurgical bleeding is still a serious complication following cardiac surgery. As nonthrombotic material or an ideal anticoagulant preventing contact activation of the blood has not been found, a method to reduce'whole body inflammatory response' and postoperative bleeding is an appealing option to improve the postoperative status of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Discussing the rationale behind preoperative leucocyte-plasmapheresis the possible benefits of this new method are explained. Reviewing the literature, possibilities of future development is outlined.

Comparison of blood reinfusion techniques used during coronary artery bypass grafting

A comparison of intraoperative autologous blood conservation techniques was carried out in 100 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. To facilitate comparisons of similar groups, patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the ratio of preoperative bleeding time to preoperative red blood cell volume. Our previous work suggested that patients with an elevated ratio have increased risk of excessive post-operative blood transfusion. We used this ratio to stratify the 100 patients to either the high-risk (39 patients) or low-risk (61 patients) strata. Within each stratum, patients were randomized to one of three groups: no intraoperative autologous blood conservation (control group), infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma obtained from intraoperative plasmapheresis (PRP group), and infusion of autologous whole blood harvested immediately before cardiopulmonary bypass (whole blood group). Variables of postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were measured in each patient. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in blood product transfusions between groups. Patients in the high-risk stratum required significantly more blood product transfusions than those in the low-risk stratum (5.4 +/- 0.7 versus 2.0 +/- 0.6 units per patient; p < 0.001). In the high-risk stratum, PRP patients required significantly less postoperative blood transfusion compared with patients in the high-risk control group (2.9 +/- 2.1 versus 8.1 +/- 2.2 units per patient; p = 0.05). In the low-risk stratum, no intraoperative blood infusion method resulted in significant improvement in postoperative blood use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Preoperative plateletpheresis does not reduce blood loss during cardiac surgery

Acute preoperative plateletpheresis has been reported to be effective in reducing blood loss and blood component transfusion while improving haematological profiles in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. However, in these studies, the concomitant use of cell saver techniques may have been responsible for the beneficial effects because they remove free haemoglobin and activated procoagulants and, therefore, could mask the deleterious effects of combined plateletpheresis and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the present study, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly divided into two groups: a control group without plateletpheresis performed, and a second group in which preoperative platelet-rich plasma 10 ml.kg-1 (PRP group) was collected and later reinfused after reversal of heparin. Standardized surgery, anaesthesia and CPB without concomitant cell saver techniques were employed. In the PRP group, blood transfusion was reduced (1.5 +/- 1.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 units, P < 0.05) but this was accompanied by lower postoperative haemoglobin concentrations. There were no differences in blood loss (992.6 +/- 327.4 vs 889.6 +/- 343.7 ml), fresh frozen plasma (2/19 vs 3/20 patients) or platelet requirements (1/19 vs 1/20 patients). Reinfusion of autologous PRP did not improve platelet count and function, nor tests of coagulation. Fibrinogen concentrations were lower in the PRP group on the operative day (P < 0.05), suggesting increased fibrinogen consumption; and more patients in the PRP group had low haptoglobin levels during CPB (8/19 vs 0/20 patients, P < 0.005), which indicated greater haemolysis in this group. We conclude that acute preoperative plateletpheresis offers no advantage in haemostasis during elective primary myocardial revascularization surgery.

RETRACTED: Influence of acute preoperative plasmapheresis on platelet function in cardiac surgery

Withdrawal of autologous plasma offers the possibility of improving patients' hemostasis and of reducing homologous blood consumption in cardiac surgery. The influence of acute, preoperatively performed plasmapheresis (APP) on platelet function was investigated in elective aortocoronary bypass patients subjected to APP producing either platelet-poor plasma (PPP; group 1; n = 12) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP; group 2; n = 12). APP-treated patients were randomly compared to patients without APP (control group; n = 12). Platelet aggregation induced by ADP (concentration 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mumol/L), collagen (4 microL/mL), and epinephrine (25 mumol/L) was determined by the turbidometric method before and after APP, as well as before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) until the morning of the 1st postoperative day. APP had no negative effects on the patients' aggregation parameters (maximum aggregation and maximum gradient of aggregation). The platelet counts in the withdrawn plasma were 25 +/- 10 x 10(9)/L (PPP-group) and 250 +/- 30 x 10(9)/L (PRP-group). Platelet counts were highest in the PRP-group at the end of the operation (after retransfusion of autologous plasma). After CPB, maximum aggregation and maximum gradient of aggregation were reduced in all groups (ranging from -6% to -25% from baseline values). Retransfusion of autologous plasma improved platelet aggregability significantly only in the PRP-group. By the first postoperative day, maximum aggregation and maximum gradient of aggregation recovered in all groups (including the control group) or even exceeded baseline values (ranging from +8% to +42% from baseline values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Con: whole blood transfusions are not useful in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Data supporting fresh whole blood transfusion or fresh component therapy are nonblinded, and although both are conceptually attractive, neither can be considered proven. Recent blinded studies reflect fresh blood ineffectiveness. Larger, blinded, randomized trials will need to be performed. Proven methods of blood conservation as well as standardized criteria for transfusion of blood components will more effectively decrease homologous blood transfusion. Transfusion of fresh or banked whole blood, or its components, has yet to be shown to decrease the usage of homologous blood products.