Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device

Optimal timing of heart transplantation in patients with an implantable left ventricular assist device

Heart transplantation (HTPL) has been established as the gold-standard surgical treatment for end-stage heart failure. However, the use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to HTPL has been increasing due to the limited availability of HTPL donors. Currently, more than half of HTPL patients have a durable LVAD. Advances in LVAD technology have provided many benefits for patients on the waiting list for HTPL. Despite their advantages, LVADs also have limitations such as loss of pulsatility, thromboembolism, bleeding, and infection. In this narrative review, the benefits and shortcomings of LVADs as a bridge to HTPL are summarized, and the available literature evaluating the optimal timing of HTPL after LVAD implantation is reviewed. Because only a few studies have been published on this issue in the current era of third-generation LVADs, future studies are needed to draw a definite conclusion.

Biological Response to Sintered Titanium in Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pseudoneointima, Neointima, and Pannus

Titanium alloys have traditionally been used in blood-contacting cardiovascular devices, including left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, titanium surfaces are susceptible to adverse coagulation, leading to thrombogenesis and stroke. To improve hemocompatibility, LVAD manufacturers introduced powder sintering on blood-wetted surfaces in the 1980s to induce endothelialization. This technique has been employed in multiple contemporary LVADs on the pump housing, as well as the interior and exterior of the inflow cannula. Despite the wide adoption of sintered titanium, reported biologic response over the past several decades has been highly variable and apparently unpredictable-including combinations of neointima, pseudoneoimtima, thrombus, and pannus. We present a history of sintered titanium used in LVAD, a review of accumulated clinical outcomes, and a synopsis of gross appearance and composition of various depositions found clinically and in animal studies, which is unfortunately confounded by the variability and inconsistency in terminology. Therefore, this review endeavors to introduce a unified taxonomy to harmonize published observations of biologic response to sintered titanium in LVADs. From these data, we are able to deduce the natural history of the biologic response to sintered titanium, toward development of a deterministic model of the genesis of a hemocompatible neointima.

Therapeutic Gases and Inhaled Anesthetics as Adjunctive Therapies in Critically Ill Patients

The administration of exogenous oxygen to support adequate gas exchange is the cornerstone of respiratory care. In the past few years, other gaseous molecules have been introduced in clinical practice to treat the wide variety of physiological derangement seen in critical care patients.Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is used for its unique selective pulmonary vasodilator effect. Recent studies showed that NO plays a pivotal role in regulating ischemia-reperfusion injury and it has antibacterial and antiviral activity.Helium, due to its low density, is used in patients with upper airway obstruction and lower airway obstruction to facilitate gas flow and to reduce work of breathing.Carbon monoxide (CO) is a poisonous gas that acts as a signaling molecule involved in many biologic pathways. CO's anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects are under investigation in the setting of acute respiratory distress and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Inhaled anesthetics are widely used in the operative room setting and, with the development of anesthetic reflectors, are now a valid option for sedation management in the intensive care unit.Many other gases such as xenon, argon, and hydrogen sulfide are under investigation for their neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects in post-cardiac arrest syndrome.With all these therapeutic options available, the clinician must have a clear understanding of the physiologic basis, therapeutic potential, and possible adverse events of these therapeutic gases. In this review, we will present the therapeutic gases other than oxygen used in clinical practice and we will describe other promising therapeutic gases that are in the early phases of investigation.

Heart Transplantation: A Bibliometric Review From 1990-2021

BACKGROUND

As the rapidly aging population and the rising incidence of end-stage heart failure (HF), extensive research has been conducted on heart transplantation (HTx). Bibliometrics harbors the function for describing the relationships of knowledge structures in different research fields and predicting the growth trend .

METHODS

The publications were searched and filtered based on the WOS core database. The target literature was visualized and analyzed by CiteSpace or VOSviewer .

RESULTS

In total, 19,998 published papers were obtained. There is a wave-like growth in HTx development. Most advanced research results are concentrated in a few developed countries, while the interactions with developing countries are still in infancy. The United States occupies a strong dominant position among active countries on HTx. Early research hotpots mostly focused on primary disease, survival risk factors, and complications. In recent years, the research frontiers have shifted steadily to clinical evaluation of immunosuppressants and diagnosis of acute rejection, cardiac re-injury with COVID-19, innovations in ventricular assist devices(VAD), and donation allocation strategies. The research directions of HTx are gradually shifting from observational studies to intervention research.

The evolution of long-term pediatric ventricular assistance devices: a critical review

Introduction: The gap between the number of heart failure patients and the number of potential heart donors has never been larger than today, especially among the pediatric population. The use of mechanical circulatory support is seen as a potential alternative for clinicians to treat more patients. This treatment has proven its efficiency on short-term use. However, in order to replace heart transplant, the techniques should be used over longer periods of time.Areas covered: This review aims at furnishing an engineering vision of the evolution of ventricular assistance devices used in pediatrics. A critical analysis of the clinical complications related to devices generation is made to give an overview of the design improvements made since their inception.Expert opinion: The long-term use of a foreign device in the body is not without consequences, especially among fragile pediatric patients. Moreover, the size of their body parts increases the technical difficulties of such procedure. The balance between the living cells of the body is disturbed by the devices, mostly by the shear stress generated. To provide a safe mechanical circulatory support for long-term use, the devices should be more hemocompatible, preserving blood cells, adapted to the patient's systemic grid and miniaturized for pediatric use.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

Introduction

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used as a bridge to heart transplant or destination therapy for patients with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 heart failure. Acute kidney injury (AKI) or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-LVAD implant can lead to poor outcomes. Identifying risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant can help stratify potential LVAD candidates.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients who received continuous-flow LVAD at our institution from January 2015 until August 2017. We calculated the incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant, as well as the rate of renal recovery and survival rates at 30 days and 1-year post-LVAD implant. The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and proteinuria was assessed, and kidney ultrasound results were reviewed on all patients, if available. CKD was present if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was <60 mL/min per 1.73m² for ≥3 months preceding LVAD implant and/or presence of proteinuria ≥ 20 mg/dL on two or more urine samples prior to LVAD implant and/or an abnormal kidney ultrasound with increased echogenicity, small size <9 cm or scarring. AKI was defined as per the current Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines.

Results

A total of 137 patients received LVAD during this time period. There were 112 males and 25 females with a mean age of 59.2 years. Incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant were 64% and 19.7%, respectively. Sub-group analysis was performed based on the presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage (Stage 1-2 vs 3-5), proteinuria and abnormal kidney ultrasound. The incidence of AKI post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.028), and patient had an advanced CKD stage (P = 0.008). The need for RRT post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.015), and the patient had an abnormal kidney ultrasound (P = 0.04). Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates post-LVAD implants were 4.3% and 21.1%, respectively for the entire cohort. Out of the 27 patients requiring RRT, nine (33.3%) came off RRT before one year. Compared to the eGFR on the day of LVAD implant, eGFR at 30 days post-LVAD implant was higher in 57% and lower in 42% patients. At one year, this eGFR improvement reversed and eGFR was lower in 67% and higher in 32% patients.

Conclusion

The incidence of AKI and need for RRT post-LVAD implant are very high. The presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage, and an abnormal kidney ultrasound are statistically significant risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant and/or need for RRT. Identifying these renal risk factors can help stratify the potential LVAD candidates. Only one out of three patients requiring RRT achieved dialysis independence by one-year post-LVAD implant.

A Proof-of-Concept Demonstration for a Novel Soft Ventricular Assist Device

Patients treated by current ventricular assist devices (VADs) suffer from various post implantation complications including gastrointestinal bleeding and arteriovenous malformation. These issues are related to intrinsically mismatch of generated flow by VADs and the physiological flow. In addition, the common primary drawback of available VADs is excessive surgical dissection during implantation, which limits these devices to less morbid patients. We investigated an alternative soft VAD (SVAD) system that generates physiological flow, and designed to be implanted using minimally invasive surgery by leveraging soft materials. A soft VAD (which is an application of intraventricular balloon pump) is developed by utilizing a polyurethane balloon, which generates pulsatile flow by displacing volume within the left ventricle during its inflation and deflation phases. Our results show that the SVAD system generates an average ejection fraction of 50.18 ± 1.52% (n = 6 ± SD) in explanted porcine hearts. Since the SVAD is implanted via the apex of the heart, only a minithoracotomy should be required for implantation. Our results suggest that the SVAD system has the performance characteristics that could potentially make it useful for patients in acute and/or chronic heart failure, thus serving as a bridge-to-transplantation or bridge-to-recovery.

Ambulatory Ventricular Assist Device Patient Management

Understanding the ventricular assist device (VAD) patient pump interface and developing expertise in monitoring patients with a VAD are the goals of care in the ambulatory setting. The objective is to improve long-term outcomes. The purpose of expert, focused, routine outpatient surveillance is to facilitate the integration of pulseless, electrically dependent VAD patients into the community. Other goals of outpatient care include maximizing quality of life, maintaining equipment integrity, treating heart failure symptoms, monitoring for common VAD-related complications, ensuring viability as a heart transplant candidate, consideration for patients implanted to become transplantable, and monitoring for possible cardiac recovery.

Short- and long-term mechanical cardiac assistance

With the increase in high risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the substantial mortality among patients waiting for cardiac transplantation, the need for mechanical circulatory support is growing. Several devices are currently available, ranging from the intra-aortic balloon pump to fully implantable ventricular assist devices. Each system has its own features, and proper patient selection as well as the timing of implantation is sometimes difficult. Algorithms for stepwise management in subgroups of patients remain controversial and the concepts of weaning patients after myocardial recovery during mechanical circulatory support need further evaluation for their long-term effects. Future identification of valuable prognostic and risk factors may help in decision-making and allow for improved survival of these often very ill patients. In this report we review the concepts of mechanical circulatory support at our institution with emphasis on a detailed overview of technical features of extracorporeal life support.

A case of electromagnetic interference between HeartMate 3 LVAD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to have a significant benefit in reducing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with systolic heart failure. Additionally, cardiac devices as a bridge to transplant or destination therapy are often used in patients with end-stage systolic heart failure. As a result, most patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) also have an ICD. Here, we present an electromagnetic interference (EMI) between HeartMate 3 LVAD and ICD. This issue might be critical for both electrophysiologists and advanced heart failure cardiologists to understand prior to implantation of ICD/LVADs in these patients.

False positive hepatitis C antibody test results in left ventricular assist device recipients: increased risk with age and transfusions

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been successfully used in patients with heart failure. However, LVADs may trigger immune activation, leading to higher frequencies of autoantibodies. We describe the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory characteristics of LVAD recipients with false positive hepatitis C (FPHC) serology among 39 consecutive adult LVAD recipients who bridged to heart transplantation from January 2007 to January 2013 at Montefiore Medical Center. FPHC patients were identified as those with post-LVAD positive hepatitis C ELISA antibody tests and negative confirmatory testing with hepatitis C RNA PCR and/or radioimmunoblot assay. Ten (26%) patients previously seronegative for hepatitis C were found to have FPHC after device placement. Of the 39 patients, 32 had HeartMate II devices. The mean age at LVAD placement was 55 years. FPHC correlated with older age at the time of LVAD implantation and with receipt of packed red blood cell transfusions, but not with gender, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, panel reactive antibodies, globulin fraction, rheumatoid factor, or anticardiolipin antibodies. Clinicians should be aware of this increased risk of FPHC in older LVAD patients and those more heavily transfused in order to avoid unnecessary apprehension and possible delay in transplantation. Further studies should be done to evaluate the possible relationship between transfused blood products and immunomodulation.

State of the Art of Combined Heart-Lung Transplantation for Advanced Cardiac and Pulmonary Dysfunction

Over the last several decades, significant advances and improvements in care of transplant patients have resulted in markedly improved outcomes. A number of options are available for patients with advanced cardiopulmonary dysfunction requiring transplantation. There is a debate about when isolated heart or isolated lung transplantation is no longer possible or advisable and combined heart-lung transplantation is justified. Organ availability and allocation severely limit the latter option to very few well-selected patients. We review practice patterns, trends, and outcomes after triple-organ heart-lung transplant (HLTx) worldwide, as well as our own experience with heart-lung transplant in the modern era.

DURABLE MECHANICAL CIRCULATION SUPPORT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO HEART TRANSPLANTATION

In the review a comparative analysis of the treatment of end-stage chronic heart failure using heart transplantation and durable mechanical circulatory is conducted. It shows the main advantages and limitations of heart transplantation and the prospects of application of durable mechanical circulatory support technology. The main directions of this technology, including two-stage heart transplant (bridge to transplant – BTT), assisted circulation for myocardial recovery (bridge to recovery – BTR) and implantation of an auxiliary pump on a regular basis (destination therapy, DT). 

Hospital Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalizations for elderly adults in the United States. One in 5 Americans will be >65 years of age by 2050. Because of the high prevalence of HF in this group, the number of Americans requiring hospitalization for this disorder is expected to rise significantly. We reviewed the most recent and ongoing studies and recommendations for the management of patients hospitalized due to decompensated HF. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry, together with the 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association heart failure guidelines, earlier retrospective and prospective studies including the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE), the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in the Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF), the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF), the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT) and the Comparison of Medical, Pacing and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial were reviewed for current practices pertaining to these patients. Gaps in our knowledge of optimal use of patient-specific information (biomarkers and comorbid conditions) still exist.

Mechanical Circulatory Support: Heart Failure Therapy “in Motion”

Because the first generation of pulsatile-flow devices was primarily used to bridge the sickest patients to transplantation (bridge-to-transplant therapy), the current generation of continuous-flow ventricular assist devices qualifies for destination therapy for patients with advanced heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. The first-generation devices were associated with frequent adverse events, limited mechanical durability, and patient discomfort due device size. In contrast, second-generation continuous-flow devices are smaller, more quiet, and durable, thus resulting in less complications and significantly improved survival rates. Heart transplantation remains an option for a limited number of patients only, and this fact has also triggered the discussion about the optimal timing for device implantation. The increasing use of continuous-flow devices has resulted in new challenges, such as adverse events during long-term support, and high hospital readmission rates. In addition, there are a number of device-related complications including mechanical problems such as device thrombosis, percutaneous driveline damage, as well as conditions such as hemolysis, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents. This review provides an overview of the evolution of mechanical circulatory support systems from bridge to transplantation to destination therapy including technological advances and clinical improvements in long-term patient survival and quality of life. In addition, recent changes in device implant strategies and current trials are reviewed and discussed. A brief glimpse into the future of mechanical circulatory support therapy will summarize the innovations that may soon enter clinical practice.

Anesthesia for Heart Transplantation

Although several new surgical therapies hold promise for changing the surgical approach to heart failure, the most effective therapy currently for patients with end- stage congestive heart failure is heart transplantation. The challenges posed to the anesthesiologist caring for these patients are great, and are increasing as a result of a shift toward transplanting medically unstable pa tients. The anesthetic management of patients undergo ing heart transplantation requires a knowledge of the pathophysiology of heart failure, the altered pharmacody namics of anesthetics in the patient with heart failure, treatment of right heart failure, as well as the impact of new surgical therapies on cardiovascular function.

Clinical trial design and rationale of the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) investigational device exemption clinical study protocol

The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system (LVAS; St. Jude Medical, Inc., formerly Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA) was recently introduced into clinical trials for durable circulatory support in patients with medically refractory advanced-stage heart failure. This centrifugal, fully magnetically levitated, continuous-flow pump is engineered with the intent to enhance hemocompatibility and reduce shear stress on blood elements, while also possessing intrinsic pulsatility. Although bridge-to-transplant (BTT) and destination therapy (DT) are established dichotomous indications for durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, clinical practice has challenged the appropriateness of these designations. The introduction of novel LVAD technology allows for the development of clinical trial designs to keep pace with current practices. The prospective, randomized Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HeartMate 3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HeartMate II LVAS (also St. Jude Medical, Inc.). The innovative trial design includes patients enrolled under a single inclusion and exclusion criteria , regardless of the intended use of the device, with outcomes ascertained in the short term (ST, at 6 months) and long term (LT, at 2 years). This adaptive trial design includes a pre-specified safety phase (n = 30) analysis. The ST cohort includes the first 294 patients and the LT cohort includes the first 366 patients for evaluation of the composite primary end-point of survival to transplant, recovery or LVAD support free of debilitating stroke (modified Rankin score >3), or re-operation to replace the pump. As part of the adaptive design, an analysis by an independent statistician will determine whether sample size adjustment is required at pre-specified times during the study. A further 662 patients will be enrolled to reach a total of 1,028 patients for evaluation of the secondary end-point of pump replacement at 2 years.

Understanding translational research: a play in four acts

Translational research (TR) bridges discovery to clinical delivery. All TR also requires the development of an intervention. Classical 'bench to bedside' TR is responsible for many important advances, but cannot account for many others, which begin with clinical observations. My personal involvement in TR has ranged from exploration of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices to amelioration of the progression of Alzheimer's disease to the pharmacologic cure of smallpox. This experience suggests that most TR is opportunistic and inefficient. A strategic approach to TR based on a better understanding of the processes it entails could enhance progress in TR despite its increasing complexity.

The interface between monitoring and physiology at the bedside

Hemodynamic instability as a clinical state represents either a perfusion failure with clinical manifestations of circulatory shock or heart failure or 1 or more out-of-threshold hemodynamic monitoring values, which may not necessarily be pathologic. Different types of causes of circulatory shock require different types of treatment modalities, making these distinctions important. Diagnostic approaches or therapies based on data derived from hemodynamic monitoring assume that specific patterns of derangements reflect specific disease processes, which respond to appropriate interventions. Hemodynamic monitoring at the bedside improves patient outcomes when used to make treatment decisions at the right time for patients experiencing hemodynamic instability.

The 100 most cited publications in cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study is a citation analysis of the top 100 most cited papers in adult cardiac surgery. Bibliometric analyses are viewed as a proxy marker of a paper's influence and, therefore, an analysis of the most influential papers published in recent decades.

METHODS

Impact factor ranking as of 2012 was used to decide which journals to include in our searches. The Thompson Reuters Web of Knowledge was used to search for citations of all papers relevant to cardiac surgery within selected journals. Journals in the areas of surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, general medicine, anaesthesia, perfusion and pathology were included.

RESULTS

The most frequently cited paper was found to be that of Nashef et al. (Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16(1):9-13, 1999) introducing the EuroSCORE operative risk evaluation system. A number of authors including Alderman, Carpentier and Cox had more than one paper in the top 100.

CONCLUSION

Despite the potential flaws with bibliometric analysis, and its application to cardiac surgery, there is inherent merit in an analysis of this type.

Mechanical circulatory support

The role for temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support is rapidly expanding. As the use of these technologies continues to grow, the emergency physician has an increasing opportunity to participate in the advancement of these potentially life-saving technologies. This review discusses the current role of the intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock, describes the complications and management strategies for the critically ill patient with a left ventricular assist device, and explores the emerging role of ECMO in the emergency department for patients presenting in refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest.

HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged to transplantation with HeartWare (HW-VAD) versus HeartMate II (HMII-VAD) left ventricular assist devices.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing Database was reviewed to identify first-time heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with either HW-VAD (n=141) or HMII-VAD (n=1824) from January 2009 through July 2012.

RESULTS

Recipients of HW-VAD had a higher proportion of female patients (27.0% versus 18.9%; p=0.019), a lower body surface area (2.01±0.25 m2 versus 2.06±0.25 m2; p=0.035), and a trend toward a higher peak percentage of panel reactive antibody against human leukocyte class I antigens (40.4%±32.8% versus 33.0%±30.4%; p=0.070). Pretransplantation recipient cardiac index (2.33±0.66 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2) versus 2.33±0.68 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2)), serum creatinine (1.21±0.43 mg/dL versus 1.26±0.57 mg/dL), and total bilirubin (1.34±3.45 mg/dL versus 1.06±1.84 mg/dL) were comparable between the two groups (p>0.05 for all comparisons). After transplantation, there were no significant differences in freedom from rejection or freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Posttransplant graft survival rates were similar between the HW-VAD group and the HMII-VAD group at 1, 2, and 3 years (88.4% versus 87.8%, 79.9% versus 83.8%, and 77.4% versus 79.9%, respectively; p=0.843).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest similar hemodynamic unloading, pretransplant end-organ function, and posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to transplantation with both the HW-VAD and HMII-VAD.

Left ventricular assist devices: from the bench to the clinic

The development of ventricular assist devices (VADs) over the past 5 decades as therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) has been extraordinary. Since the original VAD design by Michael DeBakey in the early 1960s, numerous devices for mechanical circulatory support have been engineered, assessed in preclinical studies, applied to human patients in large multicenter clinical trials, and now, select devices are Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for advanced HF patients. This review highlights select examples of durable VADs from the engineering aspect of design and conception to experimental studies and clinical application underscoring the remarkable progression of such technology to now becoming the standard of care for many advanced HF patients.

Right side of heart failure

The function of the right ventricle (RV) in heart failure (HF) has been mostly ignored until recently. A 2006 report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute identified a gap between RV research efforts and its clinical importance compared with that of the left ventricle. This recent shift in paradigm is fueled by the prognostic value ascribed to RV failure in HF and morbidity/mortality after myocardial infarction and surgery. In this review, we examine the significance of RV failure in the HF setting, its clinical presentation and pathophysiology, and ways to evaluate RV function using echocardiographic measurements. Furthermore, we discuss the medical management of RV failure including traditional therapies like beta-blockers and newer options like nitric oxide, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and calcium sensitizers. Mechanical support is also examined. Finally, this review places an emphasis on RV failure in the setting of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation.

Prehospital assessment and management of patients with ventricular-assist devices

Advances in the management of heart failure have led to an increasing number of patients living outside the hospital with a variety of ventricular-assist devices (VADs). These implantable pumps may be placed temporarily as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or resolution of a reversible condition, or as destination therapy for the rest of the patient's life. Emergency medical services (EMS) providers may be called to care for such patients experiencing an emergency related to the device itself, the underlying cardiac condition, or a totally unrelated medical or traumatic issue. Providers should have a basic knowledge of how these devices work and what sort of complications VAD patients may experience. In addition, they should know how to troubleshoot the devices if they alarm or malfunction, what emergency interventions can and cannot be performed, and where to turn for guidance if needed. Challenges related to management of patients with VADs include their poor baseline medical status, limitations of traditional prehospital assessment techniques, the relative infrequency with which these patients are encountered, and the rapidity with which device technology is evolving. This article presents a brief history of VADs, with an emphasis on left ventricular-assist devices (LVADs), reviews the relevant anatomy and pathophysiology, and describes the types of devices currently in clinical use. It discusses patient-specific and device-specific complications that may be encountered and concludes with an approach to prehospital patient assessment and care.

Right ventricular plasticity and functional imaging

Right ventricular (RV) function is a strong independent predictor of outcome in a number of distinct cardiopulmonary diseases. The RV has a remarkable ability to sustain damage and recover function which may be related to unique anatomic, physiologic, and genetic factors that differentiate it from the left ventricle. This capacity has been described in patients with RV myocardial infarction, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and chronic thromboembolic disease as well as post-lung transplant and post-left ventricular assist device implantation. Various echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging parameters of RV function contribute to the clinical assessment and predict outcomes in these patients; however, limitations remain with these techniques. Early diagnosis of RV function and better insight into the mechanisms of RV recovery could improve patient outcomes. Further refinement of established and emerging imaging techniques is necessary to aid subclinical diagnosis and inform treatment decisions.

Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a global phenomenon, and the overall incidence and prevalence of the condition are steadily increasing. Medical therapies have proven efficacious, but only a small number of pharmacological options are in development. When patients cease to respond adequately to optimal medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to improve symptoms, reduce hospitalizations, promote reverse remodelling, and decrease mortality. However, challenges remain in identifying the ideal recipients for this therapy. The field of mechanical circulatory support has seen immense growth since the early 2000s, and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have transitioned over the past decade from large, pulsatile devices to smaller, more-compact, continuous-flow devices. Infections and haematological issues are still important areas that need to be addressed. Whereas LVADs were once approved only for 'bridge to transplantation', these devices are now used as destination therapy for critically ill patients with HF, allowing these individuals to return to the community. A host of novel strategies, including cardiac contractility modulation, implantable haemodynamic-monitoring devices, and phrenic and vagus nerve stimulation, are under investigation and might have an impact on the future care of patients with chronic HF.

Treatment options in end-stage heart failure: where to go from here?

Chronic heart failure is a major healthcare problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite significant progress in treatment strategies, the prognosis of heart failure patients remains poor. The golden standard treatment for heart failure is heart transplantation after failure of medical therapy, surgery and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy. In order to improve patients’ outcome and quality of life, new emerging treatment modalities are currently being investigated, including mechanical cardiac support devices, of which the left ventricular assist device is the most promising treatment option. Structured care for heart failure patients according to the most recent international heart failure guidelines may further contribute to optimal decision-making. This article will review the conventional and novel treatment modalities of heart failure.

Durable mechanical circulatory support devices

Individuals afflicted with advanced systolic heart failure who have become unresponsive to standard medical and electrical therapies are categorized as having American Heart Association stage D heart failure. The high mortality rates for medically treated stage D heart failure have not improved in the last 10 years, and patients at this advanced stage require either palliative measures or surgical management of heart failure. In recent years, surgically implanted ventricular assist devices (VADs) have become available for long-term use and are now commonly used as a therapy for advanced heart failure. The data generated from this early experience have clearly shown that VADs improve survival and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure when implanted as a temporary measure or as long-term support. However, with a growing heart failure population, there is much work to be done to continually improve VAD technology, patient selection criteria, and postimplantation management to define the optimal role for assist devices in the management of systolic heart failure.

Allograft rejection in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Both pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) successfully provide patients a bridge to transplantation. Some data suggest that continuous-flow pumps increase the risk of allograft rejection, contributing to posttransplantation morbidity and mortality. We sought to analyze the relationship between LVAD flow characteristics and subsequent allograft rejection in bridge to transplant (BTT) patients.

METHODS

Patients with LVADs from the UTAH Transplant Affiliated Hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Rejection was determined pathologically according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation revised cardiac allograft rejection scale. Multimodal statistical analyses were applied.

RESULTS

Of 1,076 patients who underwent transplantation over a 26-year period, 151 had LVADs. Of these, 111 (77 pulsatile flow, 34 continuous flow) patients had pathologic data available. There was no difference in overall rejection (grades 1R to 3R) between the pulsatile-flow LVAD and continuous-flow LVAD groups (2.00 ± 1.43 versus 1.50 ± 1.16 episodes/year; p = 0.076.) Patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs had more clinically relevant (grades 2R to 3R) rejection than did patients with continuous-flow LVADs (0.49 ± 0.72 versus 0.12 ± 0.33 episodes/year; p < 0.001). There was no survival difference at 1 year (p = 0.920) or 4 years (p = 0.721) after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with continuous-flow LVADs have similar overall rejection rates and a reduced rate of clinically relevant rejection compared with patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs during the first year after transplantation. Although there is theoretical concern that nonphysiologic, nonpulsatile flow could alter the neurohormonal profile of patients in heart failure, we are encouraged that the type of LVAD circulation does not influence posttransplantation allograft survival.