Importance of complete system removal of infected cardioverter-defibrillators

Extracción de electrodos de marcapasos y desfibrilador mediante técnicas percutáneas

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is an increasing need for endocardial pacing and defibrillators leads to be removed. However, the procedure can be complex and it is not risk-free. We reviewed our experience between April 1989 and June 2006 with the percutaneous extraction of leads.

METHODS

In total, 314 electrodes were extracted from 187 patients. The leads had been implanted over an average period of 69.16 months (range 0.11-234.6 months, median 60.25 months). Some 115 were atrial leads, 196 were ventricular, and three were in the coronary veins; of these, 78 had been abandoned in the vascular bed.

RESULTS

Indications for removal were infection (26.1%), dysfunction (22.9%), erosion (25%), endocarditis (20.7%), and bacteremia (2.7%). Overall, 58.8% of patients were referred from other departments. In 96.8%, the electrodes were completely removed. Simple traction was used in 23.4%, and countertraction techniques (with and without radiofrequency current support) were used in 60.7%. For abandoned leads, a biopsy clamp was used in combination with countertraction (4.3%) or a femoral approach with a snare (10.1%). A sternotomy was required in three of the 10 patients with remaining electrode fragments. The complication rate was 4.6% (with major complications in 2.5%). Complications were associated with age < 60 years (odds ratio [OR]=5.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-27.23), the presence of endocarditis (OR=4.97: 95%CI, 1.04-23.70), and right side implantation (OR=17.09; 95% CI, 2.15-135.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In the majority of cases, pacing and defibrillator leads can be removed without difficulty using modern extraction techniques. However, because there is a risk of complications during extraction, even though it is low, the procedure should be carried out in specialized centers with surgical facilities.

Laser Assistance for Extraction of Chronically Implanted Endocardial Leads: Infectious versus Noninfectious Indications

BACKGROUND

Powered sheaths, including Excimer laser sheaths, were introduced for the removal of transvenous pacing and defibrillator leads. The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm to better predict which patients are likely to benefit from these devices.

METHODS

We reviewed 283 consecutive patients in whom a total of 500 leads (302 pacing and 198 defibrillator leads) were extracted over a 5-year period at our operative facilities. Laser assist was utilized whenever moderate traction failed.

RESULTS

In 128 patients, 203 leads were removed for noninfectious indication. In 155 patients, 297 leads for infectious indications, including sepsis 22% (111), pocket infection 23% (115), and erosion 14% (71). Laser assistance was required for 6%+/- 5% (+/- 95% confidence interval) of septic leads, 51%+/- 7% of leads associated with erosion or pocket infection and 60%+/- 7% of noninfected leads (P = 0.001). Laser assistance was necessary more often for leads implanted >12 months (53%+/- 5%) than 12 months or less (6%+/- 5%) (P = 0.001) and for ventricular (52%+/- 6%) compared to atrial (35%+/- 7%) leads (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronically implanted leads (>12 months), especially noninfected leads and leads associated with erosion or pocket infection, should be referred for extraction with powered sheaths to ensure successful removal. However, leads that are associated with systemic sepsis can generally be removed without powered sheaths.

Fungal infection of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Case series of five patients managed over 22 years

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), device complications are becoming more common. Fungal-related ICD infections have rarely been reported, and little is known about the presentation, prevalence, and treatment options for these morbid infections.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with fungal ICD infections.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of ICD procedures performed at a single academic center and identified all ICD-related infections managed between 1983 and 2005.

RESULTS

Among a total of 3,648 ICD-related procedures performed between 1983 and 2005, we identified 47 (1.3%) cases of ICD infections, of which 5 (0.1%) were due to a fungal pathogen. Fungal infections were more likely to be associated with abdominal devices, to have a local rather than systemic infection, and to have a longer duration from the original implant to presentation. All patients were treated with ICD system explantation and antifungal therapy.

CONCLUSION

Fungal infection of ICDs is a rare but serious complication of device implantation that must be treated aggressively with complete hardware explantation and prolonged antifungal therapy. Because most infections are late complications and have indolent onsets, a high level of clinical suspicion is required for early diagnosis.

ICD nocardiosis

We present an initial report of Nocardia asteroides implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection. Systemic infection persisted despite pulse generator explant and several years of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Without epicardial lead system removal, chronic pleuropericardial disease developed.

Nonthoracotomy Implantable Defibrillator Lead Extraction:. Results and Comparison with Extraction of Pacemaker Leads

Extraction of pacemaker leads has been demonstrated to be successful and safe in experienced hands using current tools. Whether application of such techniques and tools yield similar results among patients undergoing extraction of nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads is unknown. This report describes a retrospective analysis of indications, techniques used, and outcome of patients who had a single ventricular nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead extracted at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Results were compared to a matched population of patients undergoing extraction of ventricular pacemaker leads from a national registry and to the experience with pacemaker lead extraction at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Successful complete extraction of ventricular nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads, in the absence of major complications, was achieved in 96.9% of attempts to extract leads from 161 patients. Clinical success was achieved in 98.1% of patients. Failure occurred in three patients. Two patients had major complications, including one death. The most common indication for extraction was infection (46.6%), followed by lead failure (34.2%). Procedure (140.8 vs 171.2 minutes, P<0.01) and fluoroscopy (9.9 vs 11.0 minutes, P<0.01) times compared favorably with those obtained from the pacemaker lead extraction database. Use of LASER did not influence the safety of the procedure or fluoroscopy times. Extraction of ventricular nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads using currently available tools is a complex but effective procedure. In experienced hands, excellent success rates should be achieved with a low incidence of complications.

Laser-assist during extraction of chronically implanted pacemaker and defibrillator leads

BACKGROUND

Extraction of chronically implanted pacing and defibrillator leads has historically been difficult, occasionally requiring open surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential need for percutaneous laser-assisted sheath techniques for extraction of chronically implanted leads.

METHODS

From January 1999 to August 2001, 128 consecutive patients underwent extraction of 229 leads (138 pacing, 91 defibrillator) in the operating room 61 +/- 44 (mean +/- standard deviation) months after implantation. Common indications included erosion or pocket infection (41%), lead dysfunction (30%), and sepsis (13%).

RESULTS

Laser techniques were used for 56% +/- 4% (104 of 186) of long-term (implanted for more than 1 year) leads, compared with only 16% +/- 6% (7 of 43) of short-term (implanted for less than 1 year) leads (p < 0.001). For infected leads, laser was used in 53% +/- 5% (49 of 92) with erosion or pocket infections, compared with only 3% +/- 4% (1 of 29) with sepsis (p < 0.001). Extraction was complete in 88%, near complete (retained tip) in 10%, and incomplete in 2%. Two patients required a later percutaneous femoral venous approach to remove mobile retained segments, but no patients required cardiac surgery for extraction. Complications included sternotomy for subclavian vein injury (1), chest tube for caval perforation (1), innominate vein thrombosis (1), and partial clavicle removal for subclavian vein repair (2). There were no procedure-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-assisted lead extraction is safe, but it is best performed in the operating room; it should be available for long-term leads, except when they are grossly infected, producing sepsis. Laser techniques have essentially eliminated the need for open surgical removal of retained leads.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator endocarditis secondary to Candida albicans

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) represents an important advance in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, but infection has remained a serious complication of device implantation. Fungal infections associated with these devices are uncommon, with only 4 cases previously reported. We describe a case of ICD-associated endocarditis caused by Candida albicans that was successfully treated with complete device explantation and prolonged antifungal therapy, and we review the features of ICD-related fungal infections.

Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads

The common reasons for removal of pacing and defibrillator leads are infection, malfunction, or design defects such as fracture of J wires in Teletronics Accufix leads (Telectronics Pacing, Englewood, CO), which impose considerable risk for cardiac morbidity and mortality. Chronically implanted leads are fixed to the myocardium by fibrous tissue. Fibrous scar tissue may also encase the lead along its course. Furthermore, fragility of the lead and its tendency to break when extraction force is applied to overcome resistance imparted by the scar tissue add to the challenge of lead extraction. Thus, the extraction of chronically implanted leads is an important issue. Until a few years ago, the only methods available for the removal of chronically implanted leads were traction on the proximal segment of the lead and cardiac surgery. New techniques were developed to extract the leads by a transvenous approach using locking stylets, sheaths, snares, and retrieval baskets. Lead extraction using intravascular countertraction methods has since evolved as a specialty of its own. Progress has also been made in developing other system, such as Excimer laser energy for lead extraction. In this article, we discuss principles, techniques, and experience with these methods of extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads.

Postcardiac surgery infections

Infections following cardiac surgery, although generally uncommon, are associated with difficult management decisions and significant morbidity and mortality. They often present while the patient is either in a critical care unit, or requires CCU management. This review analyzes infections related to median sternotomy wounds, prosthetic heart valves, transvenous permanent pacemakers, automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and left ventricular assist devices. The diagnosis, microbiology, treatment and outcome of each is also discussed.