Cisplatin-induced imbalances in the pattern of chimeric marker gene expression in HeLa cells

MdmX is a substrate for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP2a

It has previously been shown that ubiquitin-specific protease 2a (USP2a) is a regulator of the Mdm2/p53 pathway. USP2a binds to Mdm2 and can deubiquitinate Mdm2 without reversing Mdm2-mediated p53 ubiquitination. Overexpression of USP2a causes accumulation of Mdm2 and promotes p53 degradation. We now show that MdmX is also a substrate for USP2a. MdmX associates with USP2a independently of Mdm2. Ectopic expression of wild-type USP2a but not a catalytic mutant prevents Mdm2-mediated degradation of MdmX. This correlates with the ability of wild-type USP2a to deubiquitinate MdmX. siRNA-mediated knockdown of USP2a in NTERA-2 testicular embryonal carcinoma cells and MCF7 breast cancer cells causes destabilization of MdmX and results in a decrease in MdmX protein levels, showing that endogenous USP2a participates in the regulation of MdmX stability. The therapeutic drug, cisplatin decreases MdmX protein expression. USP2a mRNA and protein levels were also reduced after cisplatin exposure. The magnitude and time course of USP2a downregulation suggests that the reduction in USP2a levels could contribute to the decrease in MdmX expression following treatment with cisplatin. Knockdown of USP2a increases the sensitivity of NTERA-2 cells to cisplatin, raising the possibility that suppression of USP2a in combination with cisplatin may be an approach for cancer therapy.

DNA modification with cisplatin affects sequence-specific DNA binding of p53 and p73 proteins in a target site-dependent manner

Proteins p53 and p73 act as transcription factors in cell cycle control, regulation of cell development and/or in apoptotic pathways. Both proteins bind to response elements (p53 DNA-binding sites), typically consisting of two copies of a motif RRRCWWGYYY. It has been demonstrated previously that DNA modification with the antitumor drug cisplatin inhibits p53 binding to a synthetic p53 DNA-binding site. Here we demonstrate that the effects of global DNA modification with cisplatin on binding of the p53 or p73 proteins to various p53 DNA-binding sites differed significantly, depending on the nucleotide sequence of the given target site. The relative sensitivities of protein-DNA binding to cisplatin DNA treatment correlated with the occurrence of sequence motifs forming stable bifunctional adducts with the drug (namely, GG and AG doublets) within the target sites. Binding of both proteins to mutated p53 DNA-binding sites from which these motifs had been eliminated was only negligibly affected by cisplatin treatment, suggesting that formation of the cisplatin adducts within the target sites was primarily responsible for inhibition of the p53 or p73 sequence-specific DNA binding. Distinct effects of cisplatin DNA modification on the recognition of different response elements by the p53 family proteins may have impacts on regulation pathways in cisplatin-treated cells.

Preferential platination of an activated cellular promoter by cis-diamminedichloroplatinum

This study examines how accessibility to cisplatin on various genomic regions in T47D breast cancer cells, including the retinoic acid receptor beta gene promoter and coding region and the dihydrofolate reductase gene promoter and coding region, is affected by treatment of the cells with 9-cis retinoic acid, a treatment that activates the retinoic acid receptor beta gene promoter in these cells. A PCR-based assay was used to measure cisplatin adduct density based on the inhibition of PCR amplification of templates from cisplatin treated versus untreated cells. Treatment of cells with 9-cis retinoic acid enhanced accessibility to cisplatin on the retinoic acid receptor beta gene promoter region, but not on the coding regions of that gene nor on the dihydrofolate reductase gene promoter or coding regions, where accessibilities to cisplatin remained 2-4 times lower than on the activated retinoic acid receptor beta gene promoter. Examination of smaller regions within this promoter region showed a repression of platination in the 500 bp region surrounding the TATA box in cells prior to 9-cis retinoic acid treatment, which was abolished following promoter activation. Differences in sequence composition between the various regions could not fully account for differences in platination, suggesting that structural features such as bends in retinoic acid receptor beta gene promoter DNA following gene activation, create energetically favorable sites for platination, and contribute to the cytotoxicity of the drug.

Rapid fluorescence-based reporter-gene assays to evaluate the cytotoxicity and antitumor drug potential of platinum complexes

BACKGROUND

The need for new platinum antitumor drugs is underscored by the usefulness of cisplatin and carboplatin in chemotherapy and the resistance of many tumors to these compounds. Combinatorial chemistry could aid in the search for cisplatin analogs if fast, high-throughput assays were available. Our goal was to develop rapid cell-based assays suitable for high-throughput screening that accurately predict the cytotoxicity of platinum complexes. We examined the effects of platinum complexes and other agents on reporter-gene expression in cancer cells.

RESULTS

HeLa Tet-On cells with inducible enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were prepared. Cisplatin and other cis-disubstituted platinum complexes inhibited EGFP expression, with a strong positive correlation between EGFP inhibition and cytotoxicity. By contrast, trans-[Pt(NH(3))(2)Cl(2)], other trans-platinum complexes, methyl methanesulfonate or heat shock stimulated EGFP expression. Northern and nuclear run-on analyses revealed that the changes in EGFP expression were at the level of transcription. In another reporter-gene assay in Jurkat cells, cisplatin, but not trans-[Pt(NH(3))(2)Cl(2)] or K(2)[PtCl(4)], inhibited beta-lactamase expression, as measured by hydrolysis of the fluorescent substrate CCF2.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFP results indicate that cytotoxic stress enhances transcription from the inducible promoter, whereas compounds able to form the 1,2-intrastrand platinum-DNA cross-links repress transcription. Both fluorescence-based reporter-gene assays afford promising new approaches to platinum anticancer drug discovery.

Cisplatin inhibits chromatin remodeling, transcription factor binding, and transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in vivo

The anticancer drug cis-diamminedichloro-platinum(II) (cisplatin) covalently modifies DNA, and these lesions are thought to lead to cell death by inhibiting DNA and RNA synthesis. By using in vivo analysis techniques, we have investigated the influence of cisplatin on hormone-induced transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. Cisplatin substantially reduced glucocorticoid-induced expression from the MMTV promoter stably incorporated into mouse tumor cells. The glucocorticoid-receptor-dependent chromatin remodeling and loading of transcription factors that is a signature response of this promoter in the context of chromatin were significantly reduced by cisplatin but not by the clinically ineffective trans-isomer trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (transplatin). Additional in vivo studies on transiently introduced nonchromatin MMTV templates demonstrated that cisplatin modification of DNA blocked binding of the transcription factor NF1. These results provide strong evidence that cisplatin influences transcription by interfering with the opening of repressive chromatin structures and by blocking transcription factor binding directly, each of which could contribute substantially to its toxicity.

Enhanced repair of a cisplatin-damaged reporter chloramphenicol-O-acetyltransferase gene and altered activities of DNA polymerases alpha and beta, and DNA ligase in cells of a human malignant glioma following in vivo cisplatin therapy

Current evidence suggest an important role for increased repair of drug-induced DNA damage as one of the major mechanisms involved in tumor cell resistance to cis-DDP. In this study, we examined the DNA repair capacity and the activities of three DNA repair related proteins, namely, DNA polymerases alpha and beta, and total DNA ligase in cells of a malignant oligodendroglioma obtained from a patient before therapy and compared it with those of a specimen of the tumor acquired after the patient had failed cis-DDP therapy. DNA repair capacity was quantitated as the extent of reactivation of the chloramphenicol-O-acetyltransferase (CAT) gene in a eukaryotic expression vector that had been damaged and inactivated by prior treatment with cis-DDP and then transfected into the tumor cells. The extent of DNA-platinum adduct formation in the expression vector was determined by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. The level of cis-DDP resistance of cells of the two tumors was determined with the capillary tumor stem cell assay. We observed a 2.8-fold increased capacity to repair Pt-DNA adducts and reactivate the CAT gene in cells of the tumor obtained after cis-DDP therapy, compared to cells of the untreated tumor. This was associated with increases of 9.4-fold and a 2.3-fold, respectively, in DNA polymerase beta and total DNA ligase activities in cells of the treated tumor. At 5 microM cis-DDP, there was a 5.9-fold increase in the in vitro cis-DDP resistance of post-therapy tumor cells relative to cells of the untreated tumor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential effects of cisplatin on the expression of chimeric marker genes in CV-1 cells

The effect of the antitumor drug cisplatin on marker gene expression in CV-1 monkey cells was measured. When non-replicating test genes were introduced by transient transfection, there was strong differential inhibition caused by the drug. Expression of certain genes was relatively insensitive, but expression of others was inhibited as strongly as was DNA replication. Stronger promoters led to stronger inhibition. This selective inhibition was not observed with the pharmacologically inactive isomer transplatin. The results raise the possibility that inhibition of strongly expressed genes by cisplatin may contribute to the antitumor activity of the drug.