Receptor mediated internalization of neurotensin in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells

Affinity-Driven Aryl Diazonium Labeling of Peptide Receptors on Living Cells

Peptide-receptor interactions play critical roles in a wide variety of physiological processes. Methods to link bioactive peptides covalently to unmodified receptors on the surfaces of living cells are valuable for studying receptor signaling, dynamics, and trafficking and for identifying novel peptide-receptor interactions. Here, we utilize peptide analogues bearing deactivated aryl diazonium groups for the affinity-driven labeling of unmodified receptors. We demonstrate that aryl diazonium-bearing peptide analogues can covalently label receptors on the surface of living cells using both the neurotensin and the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor systems. Receptor labeling occurs in the complex environment of the cell surface in a sequence-specific manner. We further demonstrate the utility of this covalent labeling approach for the visualization of peptide receptors by confocal fluorescence microscopy and for the enrichment and identification of labeled receptors by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Aryl diazonium-based affinity-driven receptor labeling is attractive due to the high abundance of tyrosine and histidine residues susceptible to azo coupling in the peptide binding sites of receptors, the ease of incorporation of aryl diazonium groups into peptides, and the relatively small size of the aryl diazonium group. This approach should prove to be a powerful and relatively general method to study peptide-receptor interactions in cellular contexts.

Heterodimerization of the kappa opioid receptor and neurotensin receptor 1 contributes to a novel β-arrestin-2-biased pathway

Together with its endogenous ligands (dynorphin), the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) plays an important role in modulating various physiological and pharmacological responses, with a classical G protein-coupled pathway mediating analgesia and non-G protein-dependent pathway, especially the β-arrestin-dependent pathway, eliciting side effects of dysphoria, aversion, drug-seeking in addicts, or even relapse to addiction. Although mounting evidence has verified a functional overlap between dynorphin/KOR and neurotensin/neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) systems, little is known about direct interaction between the two receptors. Here, we showed that KOR and NTSR1 form a heterodimer that functions as a novel pharmacological entity, and this heterodimer, in turn, brings about a switch in KOR-mediated signal transduction, from G protein-dependent to β-arrestin-2-dependent. This was simultaneously verified by analyzing a KOR mutant (196th residue) that lost the ability to dimerize with NTSR1. We also found that dual occupancy of the heterodimer forced the β-arrestin-2-dependent pathway back into G_i protein-dependent signaling, according to KOR activation. These data provide new insights into the interaction between KOR and NTSR1, and the newly discovered role of NTSR1 acting as a switch between G protein- and β-arrestin-dependent pathways of KOR also suggests a new approach for utilizing pathologically elevated dynorphin/KOR system into full play for its analgesic effect with limited side effects.

Internalization and recycling properties of neurotensin receptors

The targeting, internalization and recycling of membrane receptors in response to extracellular ligands involve a series of molecular mechanisms which are beginning to be better understood. The receptor-dependent internalization of neurotensin has been widely investigated using endogenous or heterologous receptor expression systems. This review focuses on the general properties of neurotensin sequestration and on the characterization of the receptors involved in this process.

Functional domains of the subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1)

The subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1) belongs to the family of G protein coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains and mediates most of the known effects of neurotensin. In the past years, mutagenesis studies have allowed to delineate functional regions of the receptor involved in agonist and antagonist binding, G protein coupling, sodium sensitivity of agonist binding, and agonist-induced receptor internalization. These data are reviewed and discussed in the present paper.

Double-stabilized neurotensin analogues as potential radiopharmaceuticals for NTR-positive tumors

INTRODUCTION

Overexpression of neurotensin (NT) receptors in exocrine pancreatic cancer and other neuroendocrine cancers make them interesting targets for tumor imaging and therapy. Modifications at the cleavage bonds 8-9 and 11-12 led to the synthesis of NT-XII, NT-XIII and NT-XVIII, three new stabilized analogues. (NalphaHis)Ac was coupled to the N-terminus for labeling with [(99m)Tc]-tricarbonyl.

METHODS

Stability was tested in vitro in human plasma and HT-29 cells. Binding to NT1 receptors and internalization/efflux were analyzed in intact HT-29 cells. Biodistribution studies were performed in nude mice bearing HT-29 xenografts.

RESULTS

All analogues were very stable in human plasma, with half-lives of 20-21 days. Degradation in HT-29 cells was more rapid (t(1/2) of 6.5, 5 and 2.5 h for NT-XII, NT-XIII and NT-XVIII, respectively). They also showed high affinity and specificity for NT1 receptors. Bound activity was rapidly internalized at 37 degrees C. The pattern of externalization was different. NT-XII was released more slowly than NT-XIII and NT-XVIII (half of the activity still inside the cells after 24 h). Bigger differences were found in the biodistribution studies. NT-XII showed the highest tumor uptake as well as the best tumor to nontumor ratios.

CONCLUSION

The modifications introduced in NT(8-13) increased plasma stability, maintaining unaffected the in vitro binding properties. The best biodistribution corresponded to NT-XII, which shows to be a good candidate for NT1 receptors overexpressing tumors. First clinical trials are ongoing.

Cell-type-specific pathways of neurotensin endocytosis

The neurotensin receptor subtype 1 (NTS1) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) mediating a large number of central and peripheral effects of neurotensin. Upon stimulation, NTS1 is rapidly internalized and targeted to lysosomes. This process depends on the interaction of the phosphorylated receptor with beta-arrestin. Little is known about other accessory endocytic proteins potentially involved. Here, we investigated the involvement of dynamin, amphiphysin, and intersectin in the internalization of NTS1 receptor-ligand complexes in transfected COS-7 and HEK 293 cells, by using the transferrin receptor as an internal control for the constitutive endocytic pathway. We found that NTS1 endocytosis was not only arrestin-dependent, but also dynamin-dependent in both COS-7 and HEK 293 cells, whereas internalization of the transferrin receptor was independent of arrestin but required dynamin. Overexpression of the SH3 domain of amphiphysin II had no effect on receptor internalization in either cell type. By contrast, overexpression of full-length intersectin or of its SH3 domain (but not of its EH domain) inhibited NTS1 internalization in COS-7 but not in HEK 293 cells. This difference between COS-7 and HEK 293 cells was not attributable to differences in endogenous intersectin levels between the two cell lines. Indeed, the same constructs inhibited transferrin endocytosis equally well in COS-7 and HEK 293 cells. However, immunogold electron microscopy revealed that internalized NTS1 receptors were associated with clathrin-coated pits in COS-7 cells but with smooth vesicles in HEK 293 cells, suggesting that NTS1 internalization proceeds via different endocytic pathways in these two cell types.

Involvement of a cytoplasmic-tail serine cluster in urotensin II receptor internalization

Most G-protein-coupled receptors that undergo agonist-dependent internalization require the presence of specific cytoplasmic-tail residues to initiate interactions with proteins of the endocytic machinery. Here we show that the UT receptor (urotensin II receptor) undergoes internalization, and that specific serine residues of the receptor's cytoplasmic tail participate in this process. We first observed a time-dependent increase in internalization of the UT receptor expressed in COS-7 cells following binding of the agonist urotensin II. This sequestration was significantly reduced in the presence of sucrose, demonstrating that the agonist-activated UT receptor is internalized in part by clathrin-coated pits. Moreover, the sequestered receptor was co-localized in endocytic vesicles with beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2. To assess whether specific regions of the receptor's cytoplasmic tail were involved in internalization, five UT receptor mutants were constructed. In four constructs the receptor's cytoplasmic tail was truncated at various positions (UTDelta367, UTDelta363, UTDelta350 and UTDelta336), and in the other four adjacent serine residues at positions 364-367 were replaced by Ala (Mut4S). Each mutant, except UTDelta367, demonstrated a significantly reduced internalization rate, thereby revealing the importance of specific serine residues within the cytoplasmic tail of the UT receptor for its ability to be internalized efficiently.

Distinct regions of C-terminus of the high affinity neurotensin receptor mediate the functional coupling with pertussis toxin sensitive and insensitive G-proteins

The functional coupling of C-terminally truncated mutants of the high affinity rat neurotensin (NT) receptor (NTS1) was characterized in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. On cells expressing NTRDelta372 (truncated NTS1 lacking the entire 52 amino acid C-terminus), NT failed to promote [(35)S]guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]triphosphate binding whereas a robust pertussis toxin (PTx) sensitive response was observed in cells expressing a partially truncated receptor (NTRDelta401 lacking the last 23 residues). Similar results were obtained when measuring the ability of NT to induce the production of arachidonic acid. Since neither deletions impaired the NT-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis, these results indicate that the membrane proximal region of the C-terminus is specifically involved in the functional coupling of the receptor with PTx sensitive G-proteins. This region was also found to be involved in the control of receptor internalization. However, PTx failed to impair internalization, indicating that these two properties are not directly related.

Release-depletion and receptor-mediated neuronal internalization of endogenous neurotensin in the stellate ganglion of the cat

The release and depletion of neurotensin in sympathetic preganglionic axon terminals and internalization in principal ganglion cells were investigated in the cat stellate ganglion by means of combined immunohistochemical staining, image analysis and confocal microscopy. Neurotensin stored in preganglionic boutons was released by 40 or 5 Hz electrical stimulation of preganglionic nerves, being depleted to 7.4 and 19.2% of control levels by continuous stimulation lasting 20 or 160 min (both stimuli delivered 48,000 pulses). Once released, neurotensin was internalized by the principal ganglion cells as evidenced by a ring of bright spot-like granules in the perinuclear region indicating the sites of intracellular neurotensin accumulation. Neurotensin internalization was time-dependent, thus, different content was found when the time between the end of stimulation and start of perfusion was varied. The onset of neurotensin internalization appeared in the first minutes, intracellular accumulation was evident at 20 min, maximal internalization occurred at 120 min and, 24 h later internalized neurotensin content had faded. Internalization was partially blocked by the nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist SR48692. These data provide evidence of presynaptic neurotensin release and depletion by electrical stimulation with varied frequencies. They also provide evidence for in situ receptor-mediated internalization of endogenously released neurotensin, raising the possibility that internalization may represent, in addition to some kind of turnover dynamics, an important part of the mechanisms of neuropeptide signaling.

Mechanisms of regulation of neurotensin receptors

Since its discovery in 1973, the neuropeptide neurotensin has been demonstrated to be involved in the control of a broad variety of physiological activities in both the central nervous system and in the periphery. Pharmacological studies have shown that the biological effects elicited by neurotensin result from its specific binding to cell membrane neurotensin receptors that have been characterized in various tissue and in cell preparations. In addition, it is now well documented that most of these responses are subject to rapid desensitization. Such desensitization results in transient responses to sustained peptide applications, or to tachyphylaxis during successive stimulations in the same conditions. More recently, desensitization of neurotensin signalling was investigated at the cellular and molecular levels. In cultured cells, regulation at the second messenger level, receptor internalization, and receptor down-regulation processes have been reported. These are proposed to play a critical role in the control of cell responsiveness to neurotensin. This review aims to compile recent data on the different biochemical processes involved in the regulation of the neurotensin receptor and to discuss the physiological consequences of this regulation in vivo.

Agonist and antagonist modulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding in transfected CHO cells expressing the neurotensin receptor

1. The functional interaction of the cloned rat neurotensin receptor with intracellular G-proteins was investigated by studying the binding of the radiolabelled guanylyl nucleotide analogue [35S]-GTP gamma S induced by neurotensin to membranes prepared from transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. 2. The agonist-induced binding of [35S]-GTP gamma S was only detected in the presence of NaCl in the incubation buffer. However, it was also demonstrated that the binding of [3H]-neurotensin to its receptor was inhibited by NaCl. In the presence of 50 mM NaCl, the binding of the labelled nucleotide was about 2 fold increased by stimulation with saturating concentrations of neurotensin (EC50 value of 2.3 +/- 0.9 nM). 3. The stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding by neurotensin was mimicked by the stable analogue of neurotensin, JMV-449 (EC50 value of 1.7 +/- 0.4 nM) and the neurotensin related peptide neuromedin N (EC50 value of 21 +/- 6 nM). 4. The NT-induced [35S]-GTP gamma S binding was competitively inhibited by SR48692 (pA2 value of 9.55 +/- 0.28), a non-peptide neurotensin receptor antagonist. SR48692 alone had no effect on the specific binding of [35S]-GTP gamma S. 5. The response to neurotensin was found to be inhibited by the aminosteroid U-73122, a putative inhibitor of phospholipase C-dependent processes, indicating that this drug may act at the G-protein level. 6. Taken together, these results constitute the first characterization of the exchange of guanylyl nucleotides at the G-protein level that is induced by the neuropeptide neurotensin after binding to its receptor.

Neuropharmacological profile of non-peptide neurotensin antagonists

Neurotensin, an endogenous peptide widely distributed throughout the brain, fulfils neurotransmitter criteria. When administered centrally, neurotensin induces various effects and modulates the activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system. It antagonizes the behavioural action of dopamine in a manner similar, but not identical, to antipsychotic drugs. Neurotensin is even considered to be an endogenous neuroleptic. In fact, microinjection of neurotensin elicits different effects depending on both the dose and the cerebral structures into which the injection is made. Our work on the development of orally-active neurotensin antagonists has led to the identification of SR 48692, the first non-peptide antagonist of the neurotensin receptor, and some analogues. This small molecule reveals a surprising neuropharmacological profile. It antagonizes turning behaviour induced in mice and rats (after striatal or ventral tegmental area administration of neurotensin, respectively), hypolocomotion induced by intracerebroventricular injection of neurotensin in rats, and reverses the inhibitory effect of neurotensin (nucleus accumbens injection) on amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in rats. However, SR 48692 cannot reverse either dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens evoked by neurotensin injection in ventral tegmental area, or hypothermia and analgesia induced by intracerebroventricular injection of neurotensin. As direct and indirect dopamine agonists have been reported to promote neurotensin release in the cortex, behavioural studies were performed using injection of apomorphine. In these experiments, SR 48692 inhibited only turning and yawning. It did not antagonize other apomorphine-dependent effects such as climbing, hypothermia, hypo- or hyperlocomotion, penile erection and stereotypies. All together, these data raise the question of the existence of neurotensin receptor subtypes and confirm that the nature of neurotensin and dopamine interactions depends on the brain structures considered.

Binding and internalization of neurotensin in hybrid cells derived from septal cholinergic neurons

Autoradiographic studies from our laboratory have previously demonstrated a selective association of high affinity neurotensin (NT) binding sites with basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. In search of an in vitro model for further characterization of the role and regulation of these sites, we have examined the binding and internalization of 125I-Tyr3-NT (125I-NT) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated NT (fluo-NT) on SN17 hybrid cells, produced by fusion of embryonic murine septal cells with neuroblastoma. 125I-NT binding to SN17 membrane preparations was specific and saturable. Scatchard analysis of the data was suggestive of an interaction with a single population of sites, the affinity (Kd = 1.7 nM) and pharmacological profile of which were comparable to those of neural NT receptors. No specific binding was observed on the parent neuroblastoma cell line, confirming that the expression of those sites is a neuronal trait. Incubation of whole SN17 cells with 125I-NT resulted in a time- and temperature-dependent internalization of the specifically bound peptide. The t1/2 of this internalization was estimated at 13 min, a value nearly identical to that reported for neurons in culture. Confocal microscopic analyses using fluo-NT indicated that the internalization process was endocytic in nature in that: 1) it was entirely blocked by the endocytosis inhibitor phenylarsine oxide; and 2) it was mediated through small intracytoplasmic particles the size and maturation of which corresponded to that of endosomes. It is proposed that the expression and internalization of NT receptors by SN17 hybrid cells represent a new facet of these cells' cholinergic phenotype that makes them amenable to the study of NT interactions with cholinergic cells.

From receptor internalization to nuclear translocation. New targets for long-term pharmacology

Receptors involved in intercellular communication at the cell surface share the capacity to desensitize through molecular and cellular mechanisms. Cellular desensitization is a rapid and dynamic process whereby membrane receptors internalize in response to an excess of agonists. The internalized receptors may recycle rapidly or undergo down-regulation when following a degradative pathway. However, receptor internalization does not necessarily mean degradation; it also represents the initial step of a retrograde signalling system whereby an "interiorized" message, the ligand-receptor complex, can be transported in contrast to second messengers, along axons or in the cytoplasm leading to long-term effects in the nucleus. Such "third messengers" have to undergo nuclear translocation to serve as transcriptional regulators in the control of gene expression. The "third messengers" are thus cytoplasmic proteins, including the receptor itself, which may be associated with internalized vesicles and released by mechanisms which have not yet been elucidated. They represent already good targets for the development of new drugs, and multi-targeting and synergistic approaches are likely to increase their usefulness.