Desensitization of neurotensin-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis in transfected CHO cells

The role of NTS2 in the development of tolerance to NT69L in mouse models for hypothermia and thermal analgesia

NT69L is a neurotensin (NT)(8-13) analog that binds the two major NT receptors, NTS1 and NTS2, and elicits similar behavioral effects as endogenous NT. Tolerance develops rapidly to some, but not to all of NT69L's effects, and to date, little is known about the mechanisms responsible for this tolerance. The development of tolerance appears to be more prevalent in behavioral effects mediated by NTS1 than by those mediated by NTS2, including hypothermia and thermal analgesia. However, we hypothesize that both NTS1 and NTS2 have important roles in mediating the effects of NT69L. Here, we investigate the role of NTS2 on NT69L-mediated hypothermia and thermal analgesia with the use of NTS2 knock-out mice. We show that tolerance develops to NT69L-mediated hypothermia and thermal analgesia following sub-chronic treatment in wild-type (WT) mice, and that NTS2 is necessary for the development of that tolerance. Additionally, we suggest potential means by which NTS2 influences these NT69L-mediated behaviors.

Mechanisms of regulation of neurotensin receptors

Since its discovery in 1973, the neuropeptide neurotensin has been demonstrated to be involved in the control of a broad variety of physiological activities in both the central nervous system and in the periphery. Pharmacological studies have shown that the biological effects elicited by neurotensin result from its specific binding to cell membrane neurotensin receptors that have been characterized in various tissue and in cell preparations. In addition, it is now well documented that most of these responses are subject to rapid desensitization. Such desensitization results in transient responses to sustained peptide applications, or to tachyphylaxis during successive stimulations in the same conditions. More recently, desensitization of neurotensin signalling was investigated at the cellular and molecular levels. In cultured cells, regulation at the second messenger level, receptor internalization, and receptor down-regulation processes have been reported. These are proposed to play a critical role in the control of cell responsiveness to neurotensin. This review aims to compile recent data on the different biochemical processes involved in the regulation of the neurotensin receptor and to discuss the physiological consequences of this regulation in vivo.

Involvement of potentially distinct neurotensin receptors in neurotensin-induced stimulation of striatal [3H]dopamine release evoked by KCl versus electrical depolarization

We intended to determine whether the effect of neurotensin (NT) on K+ and electrically evoked [3H]dopamine (DA) release from rat and guinea-pig striatal slices involved different mechanisms and/or receptors. In the two species, NT and three NT agonists were found to exhibit different relative potencies to enhance K+- and electrically-evoked [3H]DA release. NT(1-13) increased [3H]DA release with EC50 values in the nanomolar range and Emax values in the range of 100% of control. NT(8-13) and Eisai hexapeptide were both as active as NT(1-13) under K+ depolarization, but did not exceed 40% of the NT(1-13) effect under electrical depolarization. In rats, when [3H]DA release was stimulated with two successive K+ depolarizations, in the presence of NT(1-13), the NT effect during the second exposure to K+ was drastically decreased, suggesting that the NT receptor was desensitized. The desensitization process was essentially observed on Emax values, EC50 values being weakly affected. Similar results were obtained in guinea pig. In contrast, with two electrical depolarizations or with two different depolarizations (K+ followed by electrical), the NT effect during the second depolarization was not significantly affected. Concerning NT antagonists, SR 48692 antagonized with IC50 values in the nanomolar range the NT(1-13) stimulated K+-evoked [3H]DA release but did not affect, up to 10(-6) M, the NT(1-13) enhancement of electrically stimulated [3H]DA release. On the contrary, SR 142948A antagonized the NT(1-13) effect on K+- and electrically-evoked [3H]DA release. In conclusion, these results suggest the possible existence of potentially distinct neurotensin receptors differentially involved in the control exerted by NT on DA release under KCl vs electrical depolarization.