Morphological response of injured adult rabbit optic nerve to implants containing media conditioned by growing optic nerves

Is the capacity for optic nerve regeneration related to continued retinal ganglion cell production in the frog?

In the central nervous system of fish and frogs, some, but not all, axons can regenerate. Retinal ganglion cells are among those that can. The retinae of fish and frogs produce new retinal neurons, including ganglion cells, for months or years after hatching. We have evaluated the hypothesis that retinal axonal regeneration is obligatorily linked to continued production of new ganglion cells. We used bromodeoxyuridine immunocytochemistry to assess retinal neurogenesis in juvenile, yearling, and 10 year old Xenopus laevis. Retinal ganglion cell genesis was vigorous in the marginal retina of the juveniles, but in the yearlings and the 10 year olds, no new ganglion cells were produced there. Cellular proliferation in the central retina was evident at all three ages, but none of the cells produced centrally were in the ganglion cell layer. Regeneration was examined in vivo by cutting one optic nerve and then, weeks later, injecting the eye with tritiated proline. Autoradiographs of brain sections showed that the optic nerves of all three ages regenerated. Regeneration in vitro was assessed using retinal explants from frogs of all three ages. In all cases, the cultures produced neurites, with some age-specific differences in the patterns of outgrowth. We conclude that retinal axonal regeneration is not linked obligatorily to maintained neurogenesis.

Thrombospondin expression in nerve regeneration II. Comparison of optic nerve crush in the mouse and goldfish

Expression of the extracellular matrix molecule thrombospondin (TSP) was examined following retrobulbar crush injury of the goldfish and mouse optic nerve. TSP was present within the glia limitans and surrounding axon fascicles of the control normal goldfish optic nerve, but was absent from the normal mouse optic nerve. Following crush injury of the goldfish optic nerve, TSP expression increased dramatically along the path of regenerating axons and returned to near normal levels following axonal outgrowth. In contrast, during the unsuccessful attempt at regeneration following crush injury of the mouse optic nerve, TSP expression was present only in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-negative, macrophage-rich regions distal to ganglion cell axons. These results indicate that TSP expression is increased in a temporal pattern along the path of regenerating goldfish optic nerve axons and therefore may be involved in successful central nervous system regeneration. The absence of TSP in the environment encountered by damaged mouse optic nerve axons may correlate with the lack of regeneration observed in the mouse optic nerve.

Glial cell types, lineages, and response to injury in rat and fish: implications for regeneration

Axons of the mammalian central nervous system do not regenerate spontaneously after axonal injury, unlike the central nervous system axons of fish and amphibians and the peripheral nervous system of mammals, which possess a good regenerative ability (Grafstein: The Retina: A Model for Cell Biology Studies, Part II, 1986; Kiernan: Biol Rev 54:155-197, 1979; Murray: J Comp Neurol 168:175-196, 1976; Ramón y Cajal: Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System, 1928; Reier and Webster: J Neurocytol 3:591-618, 1974; Sperry: Physiol Zool 23:351-361, 1948). It was previously believed that intrinsic differences between the central nervous system neurons of mammals and fish account for their differences in regenerative ability. The past decade, however, has seen an accumulation of evidence, indicating that mammalian central nervous system neurons are able to regenerate injured axons, at least to some extent. This was first demonstrated by Aguayo and colleagues (David and Aguayo: Science 214:931-933, 1981; Kierstead et al: Science 246:255-257, 1989), who showed that injured mammalian central nervous system axons can grow for a considerable distance into an autograft of a peripheral nerve. It was also demonstrated that injured rabbit optic axons can regenerate into their own environment (i.e., into the distal part of the injured optic nerve), if the injured nerve is treated so as to make it conducive for growth (Lavie et al: J Comp Neurol 298:293-314, 1990; Eitan et al: Science 264:1764-1768, 1994).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Contacts between regenerating axons and the Schwann cells of sciatic nerve segments grafted to the optic nerve of adult rats

The relation between Schwann cells, basal laminae and axons during retinal ganglion cell regeneration was studied by using cellular, acellular and partially acellular sciatic nerve autografts into the optic nerve. Acellular grafts were achieved by temporary compression which eliminates living Schwann cells and axons. The compressed sciatic nerve together with the intact portion was used as a partially acellular graft. The compressed portion was anastomosed to the optic nerve and the intact portion was situated distally. After 3-21 days post-operation, the grafts were studied by thin sectioning and freeze-fracture. Axons were seen to regenerate into cellular grafts in contact with Schwann cells after one week, but not into acellular grafts for the entire period. In the partially acellular grafts, regenerating axons were first observed after two weeks and were always in contact with Schwann cells migrating from the intact portion. Moreover, membrane specializations, fuzzy materials in the space between apposed membranes, and putative tight junctions, were found between regenerated axons including growth cone and Schwann cells, and between adjoining Schwann cells. An extensive meshwork of putative tight junctions was displayed between reforming perineurial cells surrounding the groups of Schwann cells and associated axons. Gap junctions were seen between adjoining Schwann cells, and between reforming perineurial cells. These results suggest that the axonal contact with Schwann cell surfaces plays an important role in retinal ganglion cell regeneration.

Disappearance of astrocytes and invasion of macrophages following crush injury of adult rodent optic nerves: implications for regeneration

Injury to the mammalian central nervous system results in loss of function because of its inability to regenerate. It has been postulated that some axons in the mammalian central nervous system have the ability to regenerate but fail to do so because of the inhospitable nature of surrounding glial cells. For example, mature oligodendrocytes were shown to inhibit axonal growth, and astrocytes were shown to form scar tissue that is nonsupportive for growth. In the present study we report an additional phenomenon which might explain the failure of axons to elongate across the site of the injury, namely, the absence of astrocytes from the crush site between the glial scar and the distal stump. Astrocytes began to disappear from the injury site as early as 2 days after the injury. After 1 week the site was necrotic and contained very few glial cells and numerous macrophages. Disappearance of glial cells was demonstrated in both rabbit and rat optic nerves by light microscopy, using antibodies directed against glial fibrillary acidic protein, and by transmission electron microscopy. Results are discussed with reference to possible implications of the long-lasting absence of astrocytes from the injury site, especially in view of the differences between the present findings in rodents and our recent observations in fish.

Tumor necrosis factor facilitates regeneration of injured central nervous system axons

The results of this study attribute to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) a role in regeneration of injured mammalian central nervous system (CNS) axons which grow into their own degenerating environment. This is the first time that a specific factor involved in axonal regeneration has been identified. The axonal environment is occupied mostly by glia cells, i.e., astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Previous studies have shown that mature oligodendrocytes are inhibitory to axonal growth. Therefore, it seemed likely that application of a factor such as TNF, which has been shown to be cytotoxic to oligodendrocytes, would contribute to the creation of permissive conditions for axonal regeneration. In the present work, injured adult rabbit optic nerves were treated with human recombinant TNF (rhTNF). As a result, abundant newly growing axons (circa 9000, about 4% of the total estimated number of axons in an intact adult rabbit) were observed traversing the site of injury.

Soluble factor(s) produced in injured fish optic nerve regulate the postinjury number of oligodendrocytes: possible role of macrophages

Mammalian central nervous system (CNS) axons are virtually incapable of regenerating after injury. However, CNS neurons of lower vertebrates, such as fish and amphibians, are endowed with a high regenerative capacity. Lately, the glial cells have been credited with the regenerative ability of any specific CNS. We have previously demonstrated that many oligodendrocytes are recovered in cultures of injured rat optic nerve, while only a few oligodendrocytes are recovered from injured fish optic nerve in culture. We further demonstrated that medium conditioned by regenerating fish optic nerves (CM), which has been shown to cause axonal elongation in injured rabbit optic nerves, causes a decrease in the number of oligodendrocytes in rat glial cultures. In the present study, we demonstrate that soluble factors in the CM are capable of reducing the number of fish oligodendrocytes in fish optic nerve cultures. In addition, an inverse relationship was found between the number of macrophages and the number of oligodendrocytes. These results thus suggest that macrophages and/or activated resident microglial cells are directly or indirectly responsible for the presence of these soluble factor(s) that regulate the postinjury number of oligodendrocytes in the fish optic nerves.

Oligodendrocyte cytotoxic factor associated with fish optic nerve regeneration: implications for mammalian CNS regeneration

The limited capacity for regenerative axonal growth by adult mammalian central neurons has been attributed, at least in part, to the presence of mature oligodendrocytes, which are non-permissive for axonal growth. These cells do not interfere with growth during development, as developmental growth is largely completed before the maturation of the oligodendrocytes. Unlike mammals, fish central nervous system is endowed with a high regenerative capability. When soluble substances derived from regenerating fish optic nerves are applied to injured adult rabbit optic nerves, regenerative axonal growth is permitted. Therefore, in the present study, we tested whether the fish optic nerve, after injury, is endowed with a mechanism by which it avoids the possible inhibitory effect of the process-bearing mature oligodendrocytes. Specifically, we looked for the possible presence of soluble substances that can regulate the number of process-bearing mature oligodendrocytes. We found that soluble substances derived from regenerating fish optic nerve, when added to cultures of oligodendrocytes derived from newborn or injured adult rat optic nerves, caused a decrease in the number of process-bearing mature oligodendrocytes. Soluble substances derived from normal noninjured fish optic nerves, had a significantly lower effect. The observed decrease in the number of mature oligodendrocytes could not be mimicked by the addition of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), a known mitogen of oligodendrocyte progenitors which transiently inhibits their maturation. This study suggests a role to oligodendrocyte inhibitory/cytotoxic factor(s) in regeneration.

Growth of injured rabbit optic axons within their degenerating optic nerve

Spontaneous growth of axons after injury is extremely limited in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). It is now clear, however, that injured CNS axons can be induced to elongate when provided with a suitable environment. Thus injured CNS axons can elongate, but they do not do so unless their environment is altered. We now show apparent regenerative growth of injured optic axons. This growth is achieved in the adult rabbit optic nerve by the use of a combined treatment consisting of: (1) supplying soluble substances originating from growing axons to be injured rabbit optic nerves (Schwartz et al., Science, 228:600-603, 1985), and (2) application of low energy He-Ne laser irradiation, which appears to delay degenerative changes in the injured axons (Schwartz et al., Lasers Surg. Med., 7:51-55, 1985; Assia et al., Brain Res., 476:205-212, 1988). Two to 8 weeks after this treatment, unmyelinated and thinly myelinated axons are found at the lesion site and distal to it. Morphological and immunocytochemical evidence indicate that these thinly myelinated and unmyelinated axons are growing in close association with glial cells. Only these axons are identified as being growing axons. These newly growing axons transverse the site of injury and extend into the distal stump of the nerve, which contains degenerating axons. Axons of this type could be detected distal to the lesion only in nerves subjected to the combined treatment. No unmyelinated or thinly myelinated axons in association with glial cells were seen at 6 or 8 weeks postoperatively in nerves that were not treated, or in nerves in which the two stumps were completely disconnected. Two millimeters distal to the site of injury, the growing axons are confined to a compartment comprising 5%-30% of the cross section of the nerve. A temporal analysis indicates that axons have grown as far as 6 mm distal to the site of injury, by 8 weeks postoperatively. Anterograde labeling with horseradish peroxidase, injected intraocularly, indicates that some of these newly growing axons arise from retinal ganglion cells.

Glial response to axonal injury: in vitro manifestation and implication for regeneration

Crushed fish optic axons readily regenerate, while similarly injured rat optic axons do not; the reasons for the differences in regeneration ability may lie in differences in the environment of the axons. We have cultured glial cells from previously crushed optic nerves of fish and rat to determine whether a relationship exists between the ability to regenerate and the nature of the responses of the associated nonneuronal cells to injury. The glial cells were examined using indirect immunofluorescence with antibodies to known glial markers. In the rat cultures, mature GalC oligodendrocytes, which are known to be nonpermissive for axonal growth, were abundant. In contrast, in the fish cultures mature oligodendrocytes were rare, but A2B5 positive cells were abundant. The high number of A2B5 positive cells in the fish may suggest a high number of immature cells. This interpretation, however, should wait until evidence for glial cell lineage of the fish is available. Additional indication is provided also in the present study that the number of mature oligodendrocytes in the fish is regulated by elements external to the nerve. This study thus demonstrates an important difference between rat and fish optic nerves in the response of glial cells to the optic nerve injury.

Immunohistological localization of the adhesion molecules L1, N-CAM, and MAG in the developing and adult optic nerve of mice

The localization of the cell adhesion molecules L1, neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) was studied immunohistologically at the light and electron microscopic levels and immunochemically in the developing and adult mouse optic nerve and retina. The neural adhesion molecule L1 is strongly expressed on the shafts of fasciculating unmyelinated axons at all ages studied from embryonic day 15 through adulthood. Growth cones of retinal ganglion cell axons were weakly L1-positive or L1-negative when contacting glial cells. Unmyelinated axons were not only L1-positive when contacting each other but also when contacting glia, whereas contacts between glial cells were L1-negative at all developmental unmyelinated retinal nerve fiber layer or in the unmyelinated optic nerve head became L1-negative when enwrapped by myelin in the optic nerve proper. At all stages of development N-CAM showed profuse labeling on fasciculating axons, growth cones, and their contact sites with glial cells as well as contacts between glial cells. In contrast to L1, axons remained N-CAM-positive when becoming myelinated. Sometimes, N-CAM was found in compact myelin. However, N-CAM was absent from glial surfaces contacting basement membranes at the interface to meninges, blood vessels, and the vitreous body of the eye. MAG was first detectable intracellularly in oligodendrocytes associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus before it became apparent at the cell surface. There it was present on oligodendrocytes prior and during the first stages of ensheathment of axons, both on cell body and processes. After formation of compact myelin MAG remained strongly expressed periaxonally and was only weakly detectable in noncompacted myelin including inner mesaxon and paranodal loops. None of the adhesion molecules was detectable on extracellular matrix, in the meninges, or on endothelial cells. Immunochemical analysis of antigen expression at different developmental stages was in agreement with the immunohistological data. We infer from these observations that L1 is involved in stabilization not only of axon-axon, but also axon-glia contacts, while the more dynamic structure of the growth cone generally expresses less L1. A differential expression of L1 along the course of an axon--being present on its unmyelinated, but absent on its myelinated part--further supports the notion that L1 may be involved in the stabilization of axonal fascicles but not of axon-myelin contacts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)