Footshock stress facilitates self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex but not the lateral hypothalamus in the rat

Stress, depression, and anhedonia: caveats concerning animal models

Numerous animal models of depression have been advanced, each having multiple attributes and some limitations. This review provides caveats concerning etiologically valid animal models of depression, focusing on characteristics of the depressive subtype being examined (e.g. typical vs atypical major depression, dysthymia, melancholia), and factors that contribute to the interindividual behavioral variability frequently evident in stressor-related behavioral paradigms. These include the stressor type (processive vs systemic stressors), and characteristics of the stressor (controllability, predictability, ambiguity, chronicity, intermittence), as well as organismic variables (genetic, age, sex), experiential variables (stressor history, early life events) and psychosocial and personality factors that moderate stressor reactivity. Finally, a model of depression is reviewed that evaluates the effects of stressors on hedonic processes, reflected by responding for rewarding brain stimulation. Anhedonia is a fundamental feature of depression, and assessment of stressor-related reductions in the rewarding value of brain stimulation, especially when coupled with other potential symptoms of depression, provides considerable face, construct and predictive validity. Stressful events markedly impact rewarding brain stimulation, and this effect varies across strains of mice differentially reactive to stressors, is modifiable by antidepressant treatments, and allows for analyses of the contribution of different brain regions to anhedonic processes. The paradigm is sensitive to several factors known to acts as moderators of stress responses, but analyses remain to be conducted with regard to several such variables.

Effect of adrenalectomy on cocaine facilitation of medial prefrontal cortex self-stimulation

Adrenalectomy (ADX) is known to block the acquisition of intravenous cocaine self-administration. A previous study therefore examined whether ADX decreases sensitivity of the 'brain reward system' in general, or its response to cocaine in particular, by measuring thresholds for intracranial self-stimulation with and without concurrent cocaine administration. ADX had no effect on thresholds for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) and did not alter the cocaine dose-response curve for lowering the LHSS threshold. This result suggested that ADX does not affect sensitivity of the brain reward system. However, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) appears to be an important site in the mediation of cocaine reinforcing effects, and MPFC self-stimulation (MPFCSS) is mediated by a neural substrate that is largely independent of that which mediates LHSS. The present study therefore assessed whether ADX diminishes cocaine facilitation of MPFCSS. It was found that the threshold-lowering effect of cocaine (5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg/kg, i.p. ) did not differ between ADX rats maintained on 0.7% saline, ADX rats maintained on corticosterone (50 microg/ml) in 0.7% saline, and sham-operated controls. However, there was a trend toward desensitization of MPFCSS, itself, following ADX in the group that did not receive corticosterone supplementation. Based on this observation, and the similar responses of MPFCSS and cocaine self-administration to noncontingent priming stimulation, stress, and NMDA receptor antagonism, it is speculated that acquisition of MPFCSS and cocaine self-administration may be dependent upon a common sensitization process that is regulated by corticosterone.

Determinants of the slow acquisition of medical and sulcal prefrontal cortex self-stimulation: an individual differences approach

Stimulation-naive rats were tested for motor activity during noncontingent electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) or sulcal prefrontal cortex (SPC). Defecation during stimulation was also measured. The rats were then tested using a conditioned taste aversion paradigm for aversion to a novel flavor (0.1% saccharin) paired with stimulation. Finally, the rats were trained to acquire self-stimulation over 26 days of training. Large individual differences were seen in motor activity, defecation, and conditioned taste aversion to initial stimulation and in the subsequent speed of self-stimulation acquisition. In the MPC-stimulated group, acquisition speed was positively correlated with motor activity to initial stimulation and negatively correlated with defecation to this stimulation. In the SPC-stimulated group, the same correlations were evident, but only when rats suffering seizures prior to self-stimulation acquisition were excluded from the analysis. Such preacquisition seizures, which were only found in the SPC-stimulated group, retarded self-stimulation acquisition. In most rats, MPC or SPC stimulation failed to condition a taste aversion to saccharin. These results suggest that the slow acquisition of MPC and SPC self-stimulation may be partly related to the motor suppressive, aversive, and convulsive properties of initial stimulation.

Behaviourally derived estimates of excitability in striatal and medial prefrontal cortical self-stimulation sites

The refractory periods of the substrate underlying brain-stimulation reward were investigated in three rats with moveable electrodes implanted in the rostral caudate-putamen and the medial prefrontal cortex. Acquisition of caudate-putamen self-stimulation occurred within the first session, while self-stimulation for medial prefrontal cortex was observed only after three sessions of caudate-putamen stimulation. The currents required for self-stimulation ranged from 300 to 800 microA (0.1 ms pulse duration) across animals; the maximum response rates averaged roughly 40 bar presses per minute for both structures. Refractory period estimates were obtained from ten caudate-putamen and four medial prefrontal cortex sites. The time course of recovery had the following profile: the curves began to rise at 0.65 ms and 0.95 ms for caudate-putamen and medial prefrontal cortex stimulation, respectively, thereafter increasing to approach an asymptote at 6.00 ms for the caudate-putamen and 6.25 ms for the medial prefrontal cortex. The mean effectiveness value corresponding to the asymptotic portion of the curves was 73% for the caudate-putamen and 69% for the medial prefrontal cortex. Like other forebrain structures, the behaviourally derived refractory periods underlying caudate-putamen and medial prefrontal cortex stimulation, at least at these particular sites, are significantly longer than those observed in most medial forebrain bundle areas, both beginning and ending later. One interpretation for the similarity in their refractory period profiles and the apparent facilitating effect of caudate-putamen stimulation on acquisition of medial prefrontal cortex self-stimulation is that these two regions form part of the same reward substrate.

Schedule-controlled brain self-stimulation: has it utility for behavioral pharmacology?

We review evidence that schedule-controlled intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) has properties in common with conventional reinforcements, such as food and water, but unlike the latter, animals will respond for ICSS for long periods of time at a near-constant rate. Schedule-controlled ICSS has proven to be more sensitive to drug-induced changes than has ICSS on a continuous reinforcement schedule, and it permits a more fine-grained analysis of the pattern of responding that results in the reinforcement. Evidence is accumulating that the schedule of ICSS itself leads to neurochemical changes in areas of the brain, such as the nucleus accumbens, in which reward processes occur. Results obtained from schedule-controlled ICSS would complement those obtained by drug self-administration studies which generally use intermittent reinforcement. A systematic examination of ICSS schedules at different brain sites would greatly facilitate our interpretation of drug effects and this would have utility for behavioral pharmacology.

Cocaine facilitation of prefrontal cortex self-stimulation: a microstructural and pharmacological analysis

A novel self-stimulation methodology involving a fixed-interval (FI-5 s) schedule of reinforcement, microanalysis and threshold evaluation was used to investigate the effects of cocaine on rats lever pressing for electrical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex. Cocaine (15 mg/kg) increased medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) self-stimulation rates under FI-5 by a mean of 269% and reduced current thresholds for self-stimulation. A similar facilitation was evident with self-stimulation of the sulcal prefrontal cortex. Microanalysis showed that cocaine decreased inter-response times and post-reinforcement pauses, increased responding in the second and third quartiles of the inter-reinforcement interval (IRI) and decreased responding in the fourth IRI quartile. Schedule control of responding was still evident following cocaine despite the profound facilitation of response rates. Increased response rates were seen up to 48 h following a single dose of cocaine, suggesting sensitization of the PFC reinforcement substrate. The acute effects of cocaine on MPC self-stimulation were completely reversed by the dopamine (DA) D1 antagonist SCH 23390 0.02 mg/kg) and the D2 antagonist raclopride (0.3 mg/kg) but not by naloxone (0.5 mg/kg). These results are consistent with previous studies demonstrating the PFC as part of the neural substrate mediating cocaine reward. Further, these results implicate DA receptors in the reinforcing properties of both cocaine and MPC self-stimulation.

Contrasting effects of stress on medial and sulcal prefrontal cortex self-stimulation

Male Wistar rats were subjected to either 25 controllable or uncontrollable footshocks and then tested for changes in fixed-interval 5-second (FI-5) self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC), sulcal prefrontal cortex (SPC) or nucleus accumbens (NAS). Controllable footshock caused a moderate facilitation of MPC self-stimulation (30% above baseline rates) but inhibited SPC self-stimulation (32% below baseline rates). Uncontrollable footshock had no effect on MPC self-stimulation but inhibited SPC self-stimulation (52% below baseline rates). An inhibition of SPC self-stimulation was also evident 24 hours following controllable or uncontrollable footshock. NAS self-stimulation was unaffected by footshock. Changes in locomotor activity were not consistently related to changes in self-stimulation following footshock. These results are discussed in terms of the different effects of mild stress on the release of reward-relevant neurotransmitters in the MPC, SPC and NAS. The possible role of stress-induced hypoalgesia in determining the stress-induced facilitation of MPC self-stimulation is also discussed.

Stressor-like effects of FG-7142 on medial prefrontal cortex self-stimulation

The effects of uncontrollable stress and the anxiogenic beta-carboline FG-7142 were compared on rats bar-pressing for electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC). One minute of restraint stress produced an immediate 20% increase in response rates. A significant facilitation was also evident 24 and 48 h later. Similarly, FG-7142 (10 mg/kg) produced an immediate 20% elevation of self-stimulation rates and a significant facilitation 24 and 48 h following administration. Lower (3 mg/kg) and higher (20 mg/kg) doses of FG-7142 caused immediate decreases in MPC self-stimulation and no significant long-term effects. These results agree with previous findings that FG-7142, administered at certain doses, may mimic the effects of exposure to uncontrollable stress.

Controllability of prestimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex determines the facilitation of self-stimulation and kindled seizures

Electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) was administered according to the triadic design typically used to demonstrate learned helplessness. Three groups received either controllable, uncontrollable or no stimulation during the pretreatment phase. The effects of this pretreatment on the acquisition of self-stimulation at the same electrode site were investigated in the second phase of the experiment. Relative to unstimulated controls, both controllable and uncontrollable prestimulation facilitated the acquisition of self-stimulation and produced higher self-stimulation rates. In addition, compared with controllable stimulation, pretreatment with uncontrollable stimulation produced a greater facilitation in self-stimulation rate. The unambiguous demonstration of a behavioural facilitation produced by pretreatment with uncontrollable stimulation is, effectively, the inverse of the typical learned helplessness finding. It was also found, in the second phase of the experiment, that 6 of the 7 rats previously exposed to uncontrollable stimulation developed full class 5 seizures. No behavioural evidence of kindling was seen in any of the other rats or during the prestimulation procedure. These data are interpreted in terms of kindling and stress effects both proximal and distal to the site of stimulation.