Antagonism of the gerbil's sweetener and Polycose gustatory responses by copper chloride

Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited

Mice are attracted to the tastes of sugar and maltodextrin solutions. Sugar taste is mediated by the T1R2/T1R3 sweet taste receptor, while maltodextrin taste is dependent upon a different as yet unidentified receptor. In a prior study sweet-sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) mice displayed similar preferences for sucrose and maltodextrin solutions in 24-h saccharide vs. water choice tests that exceeded those of sweet-subsensitive 129P3/J (129) mice. In a subsequent experiment reported here, sucrose and maltodextrin (Polycose) preference and acceptance were compared in the two strains in saccharide vs. saccharide choice tests with isocaloric concentrations (0.5-32%). The 129 mice displayed significantly greater maltodextrin preferences than B6 mice at mid-range concentrations (2-8%), while the mice displayed an opposite preference profile at the highest concentration (32%). As in prior studies, 129 mice consumed less total saccharide than B6 mice at lower concentrations. These findings show that the conclusions reached from tastant vs. water tests may differ from those pitting one tastant against another. The increased sucrose preference and intake of B6 mice, relative to 129 mice, is consistent with their sweet-sensitive phenotype.

Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains

Rodents are strongly attracted to the taste(s) of maltodextrins. A first step toward discovery of the underlying genes involves identifying phenotypic differences among inbred strains of mice. To do this, we used 5-s brief-access tests and 48-h 2-bottle choice tests to survey the avidity for the maltodextrin, Maltrin M040, of mice from 8 inbred strains (129S1/SvImJ, A/J, CAST/EiJ, C57BL/6J, NOD/ShiLTJ, NZO/HlLtJ, PWK/PhJ, and WSB/EiJ). In brief-access tests, the CAST and PWK strains licked significantly less maltodextrin than equivalent concentrations of sucrose, whereas the other strains generally licked the 2 carbohydrates equally. Similarly, in 2-bottle choice tests, the CAST and PWK strains drank less 4% maltodextrin than 4% sucrose, whereas the other strains had similar intakes of these 2 solutions; the CAST and PWK strains did not differ from the C57, NOD, or NZO strains in 4% sucrose intake. In sum, we have identified strain variation in maltodextrin perception that is distinct from variation in sucrose perception. The phenotypic variation characterized here will aid in identifying genes responsible for maltodextrin acceptance. Our results identify C57 × PWK mice or NZO × CAST mice as informative crosses to produce segregating hybrids that will expose quantitative trait loci underlying maltodextrin acceptance and preference.

Maltodextrin and fat preference deficits in "taste-blind" P2X2/P2X3 knockout mice

Adenosine triphosphate is a critical neurotransmitter in the gustatory response to the 5 primary tastes in mice. Genetic deletion of the purinergic P2X2/P2X3 receptor greatly reduces the neural and behavioral response to prototypical primary taste stimuli. In this study, we examined the behavioral response of P2X double knockout mice to maltodextrin and fat stimuli, which appear to activate additional taste channels. P2X double knockout and wild-type mice were given 24-h choice tests (vs. water) with ascending concentrations of Polycose and Intralipid. In Experiment 1, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.5-4%) Polycose solutions but preferred concentrated (8-32%) Polycose to water. In a retest, the Polycose-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, preferred all Polycose concentrations. In Experiment 2, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.313-2.5%) Intralipid emulsions but preferred concentrated (5-20%) Intralipid to water. In a retest, the fat-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, strongly preferred 0.313-5% Intralipid to water. These results indicate that the inherent preferences of mice for maltodextrin and fat are dependent upon adenosine triphosphate taste cell signaling. With experience, however, P2X double knockout mice develop strong preferences for the nontaste flavor qualities of maltodextrin and fat conditioned by the postoral actions of these nutrients.

Sweet-taste-suppressing compounds: current knowledge and perspectives of application

Sweet-tasting compounds are recognized by a heterodimeric receptor composed of the taste receptor, type 1, members 2 (T1R2) and 3 (T1R3) located in the mouth. This receptor is also expressed in the gut where it is involved in intestinal absorption, metabolic regulation, and glucose homeostasis. These metabolic functions make the sweet taste receptor a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity and related metabolic dysfunctions such as diabetes. Existing sweet taste inhibitors or blockers that are still in development would constitute promising therapeutic agents. In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge of sweet taste inhibitors, including a sweet-taste-suppressing protein named gurmarin, which is only active on rodent sweet taste receptors but not on that of humans. In addition, their potential applications as therapeutic tools are discussed.

Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal

Evidence in the literature supports the hypothesis that the T1R2+3 heterodimer binds to compounds that humans describe as sweet. Here, we assessed the necessity of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits in the maintenance of normal taste sensitivity to carbohydrate stimuli. We trained and tested water-restricted T1R2 knockout (KO), T1R3 KO and their wild-type (WT) same-sex littermate controls in a two-response operant procedure to sample a fluid and differentially respond on the basis of whether the stimulus was water or a tastant. Correct responses were reinforced with water and incorrect responses were punished with a time-out. Testing was conducted with a modified descending method of limits procedure across daily 25-min sessions. Both KO groups displayed severely impaired performance and markedly decreased sensitivity when required to discriminate water from sucrose, glucose, or maltose. In contrast, when Polycose was tested, KO mice had normal EC(50) values for their psychometric functions, with some slight, but significant, impairment in performance. Sensitivity to NaCl did not differ between these mice and their WT controls. Our findings support the view that the T1R2+3 heterodimer is the principal receptor that mediates taste detection of natural sweeteners, but not of all carbohydrate stimuli. The combined presence of T1R2 and T1R3 appears unnecessary for the maintenance of relatively normal sensitivity to Polycose, at least in this task. Some detectability of sugars at high concentrations might be mediated by the putative polysaccharide taste receptor, the remaining T1R subunit forming either a homodimer or heteromer with another protein(s), or nontaste orosensory cues.

T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice

The T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are expressed in taste receptor cells and form a heterodimer binding with compounds described as sweet by humans. We examined whether Polycose taste might be mediated through this heterodimer by testing T1R2 knockout (KO) and T1R3 KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls in a series of brief-access taste tests (25-min sessions with 5-s trials). Sucrose, Na-saccharin, and Polycose were each tested for three consecutive sessions with order of presentation varied among subgroups in a Latin-Square manner. Both KO groups displayed blunted licking responses and initiated significantly fewer trials of sucrose and Na-saccharin across a range of concentrations. KO mice tested after Polycose exposure demonstrated some degree of concentration-dependent licking of sucrose, likely attributable to learning related to prior postingestive experience. These results are consistent with prior findings in the literature, implicating the T1R2+3 heterodimer as the principal taste receptor for sweet-tasting ligands, and also provide support for the potential of postingestive experience to influence responding in the KO mice. In contrast, T1R2 KO and T1R3 KO mice displayed concentration-dependent licking responses to Polycose that tracked those of their WT controls and in some cases licked midrange concentrations more; the number of Polycose trials initiated overall did not differ between KO and WT mice. Thus, the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are individually unnecessary for normal concentration-dependent licking of Polycose to be expressed in a brief-access test. Whether at least one of these T1R protein subunits is necessary for normal Polycose responsiveness remains untested. Alternatively, there may be a novel taste receptor(s) that mediates polysaccharide taste.

T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste

In addition to their well-known preference for sugars, mice and rats avidly consume starch-derived glucose polymers (e.g., Polycose). T1R3 is a component of the mammalian sweet taste receptor that mediates the preference for sugars and artificial sweeteners in mammals. We examined the role of the T1R3 receptor in the ingestive response of mice to Polycose and sucrose. In 60-s two-bottle tests, knockout (KO) mice preferred Polycose solutions (4-32%) to water, although their overall preference was lower than WT mice (82% vs. 94%). KO mice also preferred Polycose (0.5-32%) in 24-h two-bottle tests, although less so than WT mice at dilute concentrations (0.5-4%). In contrast, KO mice failed to prefer sucrose to water in 60-s tests. In 24-h tests, KO mice were indifferent to 0.5-8% sucrose, but preferred 16-32% sucrose; this latter result may reflect the post-oral effects of sucrose. Overall sucrose preference and intake were substantially less in KO mice than WT mice. However, when retested with 0.5-32% sucrose solutions, the KO mice preferred all sucrose concentrations, although they drank less sugar than WT mice. The experience-induced sucrose preference is attributed to a post-oral conditioned preference for the T1R3-independent orosensory features of the sugar solutions (odor, texture, T1R2-mediated taste). Chorda tympani nerve recordings revealed virtually no response to sucrose in KO mice, but a near-normal response to Polycose. These results indicate that the T1R3 receptor plays a critical role in the taste-mediated response to sucrose but not Polycose.

Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins

Trpm5 and alpha-gustducin are key to the transduction of tastes of sugars, amino acids, and bitter compounds. This study investigated the role of these signaling proteins in the preference for fat, starch, and starch-derived polysaccharides (Polycose), using Trpm5 knockout (Trpm5 KO) and alpha-gustducin knockout (Gust KO) mice. In initial two-bottle tests (24 h/day), Trpm5 KO mice showed no preference for soybean oil emulsions (0.313-2.5%), Polycose solutions (0.5-4%), or starch suspensions (0.5-4%). Gust KO mice displayed an attenuated preference for Polycose, but their preferences for soybean oil and starch were comparable to those of C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) mice. Gust KO mice preferred starch to Polycose, whereas WT mice had the opposite preference. After extensive experience with soybean oil emulsions (Intralipid) and Polycose solutions, the Trpm5 KO mice developed preferences comparable to the WT mice, although their absolute intakes remained suppressed. Similarly, Gust KO mice developed a strong Polycose preference with experience, but they continued to consume less than the WT mice. These results implicate alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 as mediators of polysaccharide taste and Trpm5 in fat taste. The disruption in Polycose, but not starch, preference in Gust KO mice indicates that distinct sensory signaling pathways mediate the response to these carbohydrates. The experience-induced rescue of fat and Polycose preferences in the KO mice likely reflects the action of a postoral-conditioning mechanism, which functions in the absence of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5.

Analysis of polysaccharide taste in hamsters: behavioral and neural studies

A series of studies was carried out in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) to determine whether polysaccharides have behavioral and neurophysiological characteristics that distinguish them from simple sugars. Behavioral studies utilized solutions of glucose, maltose, sucrose, Polycose, and glycogen in two-bottle preference tests and in tests of generalization of conditioned taste aversions. Multiunit and single-unit responses of the chorda tympani nerve were studied with the same stimuli. Neural responses to Polycose and glycogen were found to be generated primarily by ionic contaminants. Dialysis or deionization dramatically reduced electrophysiological responses, a result consistent with occurrence of Polycose and glycogen sensitivity in electrolyte-sensitive nerve fibers. Effects of treatment with the Na + -channel blocker amiloride and cross-adaptation were also consistent with neural responses generated by ionic contaminants. Hamsters showed strong preferences for the sugars and Polycose, a mixture of glucose polymers with alpha-1,4 linkages, and even stronger preferences for a glycogen preparation. Conditioned flavor aversions were established to glycogen, sucrose, and maltose, but no aversion was learned to 3.2% Polycose. The learned aversion to maltose partly generalized to glycogen and sucrose, but sucrose and glycogen did not cross-generalize. Deionization did not affect the preferences for Polycose and glycogen but removal of contaminants of mol.wt. < or = 7000 Da greatly reduced preference for glycogen. In conclusion, glycogen itself, after removal of low molecular weight contaminants, is a poor taste stimulus in hamsters, both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. However, Polycose is highly preferred by hamsters but gives little chorda tympani response after removal of ionic contaminants. In alert animals, the action of salivary amylase on polysaccharides may produce simpler, detectable taste stimuli.

Differences in taste responses to Polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological studies

Behavioral and electrophysiological experiments were performed to examine the suggestion that rats have two types of carbohydrate taste receptors, one for polysaccharides (e.g., Polycose) and one for common sugars (e.g., sucrose). Qualitative difference between the tastes of Polycose and sugars including sucrose, maltose, glucose, and fructose was surveyed by means of a conditioned taste aversion paradigm in which the number of licks for 20 s to each taste stimulus was measured. Aversive conditioning to Polycose did not generalize to sugars, while aversive conditioning to sucrose generalized to other sugars, but not to Polycose. In the electrophysiological study, taste responses of the whole chorda tympani were recorded. A proteolytic enzyme, pronase E, suppressed nerve responses to both Polycose and sugars to less than 50%. A novel anti-sweet peptide, gurmarin, strongly suppressed responses to sugars, but had essentially no effect on Polycose responses. On the other hand, KHCO3 enhanced responses to sugars to about 300%, but had little effect on Polycose responses. These results have confirmed the notion that rats can differentiate the tastes between Polycose and common sugars and that rats have two types of carbohydrate receptors.

Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats

The present studies examined rats' responses to two maltodextrin preparations. One maltodextrin, a maltooligosaccharide, had an average chain length of 4.4 glucose units. The other maltodextrin was a maltopolysaccharide, having an average chain length of 22. In 24-h preference tests, rats strongly preferred 1% and 5% maltodextrin over water, regardless of the type of maltodextrin offered. When given a choice of two maltodextrins, rats preferred the maltooligosaccharide, but the degree of preference was influenced by the rats' previous experience with maltodextrins. Conditioned flavor aversion experiments were conducted to determine whether rats detect qualitative flavor differences between the these two maltodextrins. Rats trained to avoid one maltodextrin also avoided the other maltodextrin. Nevertheless, rats could be trained to drink maltooligosaccharide but avoid maltopolysaccharide; these rats showed no reliable tendency to respond to the intensity of maltooligosaccharide flavor. Therefore, maltodextrins of varying chain length differ more in flavor quality than in flavor intensity. This difference in flavor quality is not attributable to known sweet and starch flavors because neither maltodextrin contained much glucose and because rats trained to avoid the polysaccharide did not avoid starch. Because rats can discriminate between solutions containing only 0.5-1% maltodextrin, their ability to discriminate among carbohydrates must be far more acute than that of humans.

Single neuron gustatory responses of the gerbil chorda tympani to a variety of stimuli (recorded by a new method)

In most mammalian studies on gustatory single neuron recordings, the animal's chorda tympani nerve was cut and manipulated. This results in nerve trauma which may have affected the precision of the responses. In this paper, we are presenting a method whereby gustatory recordings were obtained from gerbil single chorda tympani neurons by inserting a microelectrode directly into the uncut nerve. The stimuli included 0.3 M NaCl, 0.3 M KCl, 0.3 M CaCl2, 0.3 M NH4Cl, 0.05 M acetic acid, 0.01 M quinine HCl, 32% Polycose and the sweeteners 0.5 M D-glucose, 0.5 M D-fructose, 0.02 M sodium saccharin and 0.5 M sucrose. While thirty-seven of the sixty seven neurons tested did not respond to any of the eleven gustatory stimuli applied to the gerbil's tongue, thirty positive single neuron responses were obtained to this group of compounds. The thirty positive neuron responses were grouped in two ways: (1) by observationally sorting the data according to maximum responses to four stimuli, sucrose, NH4Cl, NaCl, and acetic acid; and (2) by objectively sorting the data matrix using cluster analysis. The groups resulting from each method were then characterized and compared by discriminant function analysis. By the first grouping method, ten neurons responded best to sodium chloride, seven to acetic acid, four to ammonium chloride, and nine to sucrose. However, canonical discriminant function analysis showed that two of the four groups, acetic acid and ammonium chloride, occupied the same region of discriminant space and should be combined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Is starch flavor unitary? Evidence from studies of cooked starch

Although starch is the world's most abundant nutritive carbohydrate, its sensory properties are not as well understood as those of sugars. Previous researchers have assumed that all starches have the same flavor. The present experiments examined flavor differences among starches. Untrained rats were offered a choice of suspensions containing raw versus cooked starch. For some starches (potato and rice), rats strongly preferred cooked over uncooked starch. For other starches (regular corn, corn amylopectin, and wheat), rats showed little or no preference for cooked over uncooked starch. In order to determine whether the greater preference for cooked starch reflects a difference in flavor intensity, rats were conditioned to avoid potato or corn amylopectin starches by pairing ingestion of these substances with lithium chloride injections. Rats trained to avoid raw starch also avoided cooked starch, indicating that cooked and raw starch have similar flavors. However, when these trained rats were offered a choice between cooked and raw starch, they avoided the raw starch; this result is inconsistent with the assumption that cooking enhances the intensity of starch flavor. Similar results were obtained with corn amylopectin and potato starch, even though these starches differ greatly with regard to the effects of cooking on preference in untrained rats. However, rats trained to avoid potato starch avoided this starch to a greater degree than did rats trained to avoid corn amylopectin; conversely, rats trained to avoid corn amylopectin avoided this starch to a greater degree than did rats trained to avoid potato starch. Therefore, the flavor of starch is complex; there are specific flavor notes related to species and cooking.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Starch and sugar tastes in rodents: an update

Rats are strongly attracted to the sweet taste of sugar. Recent behavioral studies demonstrate that rats also have a well-developed taste for starch-derived polysaccharides (e.g., Polycose). In fact, rats prefer Polycose to sucrose and other sugars at low concentrations. Polycose appetite develops at a very young age (9 days) and, thus, appears to be innate. The results of conditioned taste aversion tests suggest that rats taste Polycose as qualitatively different from sucrose. Recent electrophysiological findings support the idea that rodents have separate taste channels for polysaccharides and sugars. In particular, copper chloride suppresses the chorda tympani nerve response to sucrose and other sugars but has minimal effect on the neural response to Polycose. Also, Polycose evokes a profile of neural activity in the nucleus tractus solitarius that differs substantially from that produced by sucrose. Preliminary results indicate that polysaccharide and sugar tastes also differ in their metabolic consequences, i.e., unlike sugars, Polycose does not elicit a cephalic phase insulin response. The presumed function of polysaccharide taste is to facilitate the identification of starch-rich foods. Recent findings demonstrate that rats can readily detect starch even at low concentrations, but whether polysaccharide taste receptors or other orosensory receptors mediate this response remains to be clarified.