Regulatory responses in contact sensitivity: afferent suppressor T cells inhibit the activation of efferent suppressor T cells

Matrix metalloproteinase deficiencies affect contact hypersensitivity: stromelysin-1 deficiency prevents the response and gelatinase B deficiency prolongs the response

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are expressed by T cells and macrophages, but there is a paucity of evidence for their role in immune responses. We have studied mice with deficiencies of stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) or gelatinase B (MMP-9) in a dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB)-induced model of contact hypersensitivity (CHS). Stromelysin-1-deficient mice showed a markedly impaired CHS response to topical DNFB, although they responded normally to cutaneously applied phenol, an acute irritant. Lymphocytes from lymph nodes of DNFB-sensitized stromelysin-1-deficient mice did not proliferate in response to specific soluble antigen dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid, but did proliferate identically to lymph node lymphocytes from wild-type mice when presented with the mitogen Con A. An intradermal injection of stromelysin-1 immediately before DNFB sensitization rescued the impaired CHS response to DNFB in stromelysin-1-deficient mice. Unlike stromelysin-1-deficient mice, gelatinase B-deficient mice exhibited a CHS response comparable to wild-type controls at 1 day postchallenge, but the response persisted beyond 7 days in contrast to the complete resolution observed in wild-type mice by 7 days. However, gelatinase B-deficient mice had a normal rate of resolution of acute inflammation elicited by cutaneous phenol. Gelatinase B-deficient mice failed to show IL-10 production at the site of CHS, an essential feature of resolution in control mice. These results indicate that stromelysin-1 and gelatinase B serve important functions in CHS. Stromelysin-1 is required for initiation of the response, whereas gelatinase B plays a critical role in its resolution.

Regulation of contact hypersensitivity by interleukin 10

Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses require the participation of T cells, along with a variety of cytokines and adhesion molecules. In the classical CHS, antigen-specific T cells are recruited to a site of antigenic challenge, where they react with antigen, release cytokines, and attract other inflammatory cells. In the mouse model of CHS, this reaction is elicited in sensitized mice by application of the immunogen 4-7 d after immunization. The reaction peaks at 24 h, is slightly reduced by 48 h, and can return to normal by 72 h. This is in spite of the fact that some antigen is still present at the site of challenge. Here we examined the hypothesis that locally produced interleukin 10 (IL-10) regulates the duration of the response. Our data show that IL-10 protein peaked 10-14 h after antigenic challenge and returned to background by 24 h. The production of IL-10 protein corresponded with, and followed IL-10 mRNA transcription as detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. During peak IL-10 production after antigenic challenge, it was not possible to transfer CHS with immune lymphoid cells, unless neutralizing antibody to IL-10 was given first. Additionally, when sensitized mice were given neutralizing anti-IL-10 antibody at the time of antigenic challenge, the duration of CHS was prolonged well beyond the natural course of the response. Finally, we demonstrate that rIL-10, when injected into the skin before antigenic challenge, prevented the elicitation of CHS in previously sensitized mice. Taken together, our data show an important role for IL-10 in the natural regulation of CHS responses in vivo.

Regulation of contact sensitivity reaction: contrasuppressor T cells and contrasuppressor factor downregulate efferent T suppressor cells

Contact sensitivity (CS) reaction mediated by CD 4+8- Th 1 cells is under the control of several antigen-specific regulatory lymphocytes. Reaction is downregulated at the induction stage by T afferent suppressor T cells (Ts-aff) that prevent immunization and at the effector stage by efferent T suppressor cells (Ts-eff) that made immune Th 1 cells inoperative. Both suppressor cells are CD 4-8+ Th 1 effector cells and are protected against the suppressive action of Ts-eff cells by CD 4+8- contrasuppressor T cells (Tcs). As has been already shown there are also regulatory interactions between regulatory cells themselves and Ts-aff cells in addition to their effect on precursors of Th 1 cells, also preventing the induction of Ts-eff cells. The present experiments extend these findings and demonstrate that Ts-eff cells are also under negative control of Tcs lymphocytes. Likewise, antigen-specific factor produced by contrasuppressor T-T cell hybridoma, used in lieu of Tcs cells, impedes the activation of Ts-eff cells. In both cases regulation is aimed at the precursors of Ts-eff cells. Our experiments demonstrate that the outcome of immunization is dependent not only on the balance between immune cells and regulatory cells, but also on interactions between regulatory cells themselves.