Lifibrol: a novel lipid-lowering drug for the therapy of hypercholesterolemia. Lifibrol Study Group

Lifibrol as a model compound for a novel lipid-lowering mechanism of action

Lifibrol is a potent lipid-lowering drug with an unknown mechanism of action. We investigated its effects on lipoprotein and sterol metabolism in normocholesterolemic male participants. Seven participants were treated for 4 weeks with 600 mg/d lifibrol and 9 with 40 mg/d pravastatin in a double-blind randomized parallel-group trial. Kinetic studies were performed at baseline and under acute and chronic treatment. Turnover of apolipoprotein B-100 was investigated with endogenous stable-isotope labeling, and kinetic parameters were derived by multicompartmental modeling. Lathosterol and cholesterol metabolism were investigated using mass isotopomer distribution analysis (MIDA) after [1-(13)C]acetate labeling. Carbon metabolism was investigated by calculating the total isotope incorporation into newly formed sterols and measuring the disposal of acetate by (13)CO(2) breath analysis. Total- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreased by 18% and 27% under lifibrol and by 17% and 28% under pravastatin, respectively, whereas very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change. Very-low-density lipoprotein apoB fractional synthesis and production increased under lifibrol but remained unchanged under pravastatin. Low-density lipoprotein apoB fractional synthesis and production increased under pravastatin but remained unchanged under lifibrol. Mass isotopomer distribution analysis indicated that both drugs decrease endogenous sterol synthesis after acute administration, but pravastatin had more powerful effects. Carbon-13 appearance in breath was higher during pravastatin than during lifibrol treatment. Mass isotopomer distribution analysis and carbon metabolism analysis indicated compartmentalization at the site of sterol synthesis, thus suggesting differential effects of the 2 drugs. Although having comparable lipid-lowering properties, lifibrol seems to have a mechanism of action distinct from that of statins. Lifibrol could serve as a model compound for the development of new lipid-lowering agents.

Pharmacotherapy for dyslipidaemia--current therapies and future agents

Current lipid-altering agents that lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) primarily through increased hepatic LDL receptor activity include statins, bile acid sequestrants/resins and cholesterol absorption inhibitors such as ezetimibe, plant stanols/sterols, polyphenols, as well as nutraceuticals such as oat bran, psyllium and soy proteins; those currently in development include newer statins, phytostanol analogues, squalene synthase inhibitors, bile acid transport inhibitors and SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) activating ligands. Other current agents that affect lipid metabolism include nicotinic acid (niacin), acipimox, high-dose fish oils, antioxidants and policosanol, whilst those in development include microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitors, acylcoenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitors, gemcabene, lifibrol, pantothenic acid analogues, nicotinic acid-receptor agonists, anti-inflammatory agents (such as Lp-PLA(2) antagonists and AGI1067) and functional oils. Current agents that affect nuclear receptors include PPAR-alpha and -gamma agonists, while in development are newer PPAR-alpha, -gamma and -delta agonists, as well as dual PPAR-alpha/gamma and 'pan' PPAR-alpha/gamma/delta agonists. Liver X receptor (LXR), farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and sterol-regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) are also nuclear receptor targets of investigational agents. Agents in development also may affect high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) blood levels or flux and include cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors (such as torcetrapib), CETP vaccines, various HDL 'therapies' and upregulators of ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC) A1, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and scavenger receptor class B Type 1 (SRB1), as well as synthetic apolipoprotein (Apo)E-related peptides. Fixed-dose combination lipid-altering drugs are currently available such as extended-release niacin/lovastatin, whilst atorvastatin/amlodipine, ezetimibe/simvastatin, atorvastatin/CETP inhibitor, statin/PPAR agonist, extended-release niacin/simvastatin and pravastatin/aspirin are under development. Finally, current and future lipid-altering drugs may include anti-obesity agents which could favourably affect lipid levels.

Existing and investigational combination drug therapy for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

For the past 3 to 4 decades, clinical outcomes trials have shown that drugs that favorably alter serum lipid levels reduce the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events. However, despite these successes, the reduction in serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with monotherapy lipid-altering drugs does not "cure" CAD to the same degree that antibiotics "cure" many infections, nor do they "prevent" CAD in the same way that childhood immunizations "prevent" the onset of such conditions as measles, mumps, and rubella. Clinical outcome trials of monotherapy lipid-altering drugs have demonstrated a reduction in the relative risk of CAD in only a minority of patients. Thus, although safe and very effective in lowering serum LDL cholesterol levels, drugs that predominantly lower cholesterol do not "cure" atherosclerotic disease, nor have they been shown to "prevent" most CAD events in numerous clinical outcome trials. The reason for the suboptimal CAD outcomes benefits of monotherapy lipid-altering drugs is likely because atherosclerosis is a complex pathologic process with many important risk factors involved in the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions and involved in the onset of the CAD event itself. An elevated serum LDL cholesterol level is an important CAD risk factor, but it is not the only lipid risk factor. A decreased serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level is another important risk factor for CAD. Combination therapy through existing drugs (or possibly, in the future, through investigational lipid-altering drugs) may not only improve LDL cholesterol but also improve serum HDL cholesterol levels. This more global, multidimensional approach to lipid-altering drug treatment may provide the best chance to prevent CAD.

Novel agents for managing dyslipidaemia

An elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level is a strong predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Over the past seven years, equally strong evidence has accumulated that lowering LDL cholesterol with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins reduces CHD risk and there is now widespread use of these agents for the primary and secondary prevention of CHD. Treatment issues remain regarding the appropriate degree of LDL cholesterol reduction and whether, in people with very high levels, it would be preferable to achieve the LDL cholesterol goal with a powerful statin alone or combined with an agent that lowers LDL cholesterol by a different mechanism. The main focus in the development of novel agents is the patient with low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, usually associated with hypertriglyceridaemia. Already prevalent as a risk factor for CHD, this abnormality has been linked with insulin resistance, which is likely to increase greatly over the next decade, along with increasing obesity and diabetes. Agents that have potent HDL cholesterol raising capacity include cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, retinoid X receptor (RXR) selective agonists, specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists and oestrogen-like compounds. Another area of development involves agents that will lower both cholesterol and triglyceride levels, such as partial inhibitors of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and perhaps squalene synthase inhibitors and agonists of AMP kinase. Future emphasis will be on correcting all lipid abnormalities for the prevention of CHD, not just lowering LDL cholesterol.

The effects of lifibrol (K12.148) on the cholesterol metabolism of cultured cells: evidence for sterol independent stimulation of the LDL receptor pathway

Lifibrol (4-(4'-tert. butylphenyl)-1-(4'-carboxyphenoxy)-2-butanol) is a new hypocholesterolemic compound; it effectively lowers low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. We studied the effects of lifibrol on the cholesterol metabolism of cultured cells. In the hepatoma cell line HepG2, Lifibrol decreased the formation of sterols from [14C]-acetic acid by approximately 25%. Similar to lovastatin, lifibrol had no effect on the synthesis of sterols from [14C]-mevalonic acid. Lifibrol did not inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. Instead, cholesterol synthesis inhibition by lifibrol was entirely accounted for by competitive inhibition of HMG-CoA synthase. Lifibrol enhanced the cellular binding, uptake, and degradation of LDL in cultured cells in a dose dependent fashion. The stimulation of LDL receptors was significantly stronger than expected from the effect of lifibrol on sterol synthesis. In parallel, lifibrol increased the amount of immunologically detectable receptor protein. Stimulation of LDL receptor mediated endocytosis was observed both in the presence and in the absence of cholesterol-containing lipoproteins. In the absence of an extracellular source of cholesterol, both lifibrol and lovastatin induced microsomal HMG-CoA reductase. Co-incubation with LDL was sufficient to suppress the lifibrol mediated increase in reductase activity, indicating that lifibrol does not affect the production of the non-sterol derivative(s) which are thought to regulate HMG-CoA reductase activity at the post-transcriptional level. Considered together, the data suggest that the hypolipidemic action of lifibrol may, at least in part, be mediated by sterol-independent stimulation of the LDL receptor pathway. A potential advantage of lifibrol is that therapeutic concentrations do not interfere with the production of mevalonate which is required not only to synthesize sterols but also as a precursor of electron transport moieties, glycoproteins and farnesylated proteins.

Current, new and future treatments in dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis

The new therapeutic options available to clinicians treating dyslipidaemia in the last decade have enabled effective treatment for many patients. The development of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been a major advance in that they possess multiple pharmacological effects (pleiotropic effects) resulting in potent reductions of low density lipoproteins (LDL) and prevention of the atherosclerotic process. More recently, the newer fibric acid derivatives have also reduced LDL to levels comparable to those achieved with statins, have reduced triglycerides, and gemfibrozil has been shown to increase high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Nicotinic acid has been made tolerable with sustained-release formulations, and is still considered an excellent choice in elevating HDL cholesterol and is potentially effective in reducing lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, an emerging risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Furthermore, recent studies have reported positive lipid-lowering effects from estrogen and/or progestogen in postmenopausal women but there are still conflicting reports on the use of these agents in dyslipidaemia and in females at risk for CHD. In addition to lowering lipid levels, these antihyperlipidaemic agents may have directly or indirectly targeted thrombogenic, fibrinolytic and atherosclerotic processes which may have been unaccounted for in their overall success in clinical trials. Although LDL cholesterol is still the major target for therapy, it is likely that over the next several years other lipid/lipoprotein and nonlipid parameters will become more generally accepted targets for specific therapeutic interventions. Some important emerging lipid/lipoprotein parameters that have been associated with CHD include elevated triglyceride, oxidised LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) levels, and low HDL levels. The nonlipid parameters include elevated homocysteine and fibrinogen, and decreased endothelial-derived nitric oxide production. Among the new investigational agents are inhibitors of squalene synthetase, acylCoA: cholesterol acyltransferase, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, monocyte-macrophages and LDL cholesterol oxidation. Future applications may include thyromimetic therapy, cholesterol vaccination, somatic gene therapy, and recombinant proteins, in particular, apolipoproteins A-I and E. Non-LDL-related targets such as peroxisome proliferator-activating receptors, matrix metalloproteinases and scavenger receptor class B type I may also have clinical significance in the treatment of atherosclerosis in the near future. Before lipid-lowering therapy, dietary and lifestyle modification is and should be the first therapeutic intervention in the management of dyslipidaemia. Although current recommendations from the US and Europe are slightly different, adherence to these recommendations is essential to lower the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease, more specifically CHD. New guidelines that are expected in the near future will encompass global opinions from the expert scientific community addressing the issue of target LDL goal (aggressive versus moderate lowering) and the application of therapy for newer emerging CHD risk factors.

HDL steady state levels are not affected, but HDL apoA-I turnover is enhanced by Lifibrol in patients with hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia

Lifibrol (4-(4'-tert-butylphenyl)-1-(4'carboxyphenoxy)-2-butanol) is a new hypocholesterolemic drug effectively reducing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B in experimental animals and in humans. In contrast to fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors the cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of Lifibrol is not accompanied by increases in HDL cholesterol and apoA-I levels. We examined the impact of Lifibrol on the metabolism of HDL apoA-I in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia, using endogenous labeling with stable isotopes. Kinetic studies were performed in five male hypercholesterolemic individuals (type IIa), before and on treatment with 450 mg of Lifibrol daily for 4 weeks and in five male individuals suffering from mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIb), before and on therapy, for 12 weeks. Lifibrol reduced total cholesterol by 14% (P=0.02) and LDL cholesterol by 16% (P=0. 014) in all patients, and decreased triglycerides by 34% in type IIb patients. During Lifibrol therapy, HDL cholesterol and ApoA-I concentrations did not change. Tracer kinetics revealed that the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of HDL apoA-I increased by 22% (P=0. 013). This increase in the apoA-I FCR was accompanied by a 23% increase in HDL apoA-I production rate (P=0.006). We conclude that Lifibrol, although not changing HDL steady state concentrations, enhances the turnover of apoA-I containing HDL particles.

Polymorphism and preformulation studies of lifibrol

Three polymorphic modifications of lifibrol, a novel cholesterol-lowering drug substance, were detected and thoroughly investigated and characterized by thermomicroscopy, DSC, IR-spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffractometry. Mod. I (m.p. 142 degrees C) and mod. II (m.p. 135 degrees C) are stable. Furthermore, true densities, solubilities as function of temperature and pH-value as well as the behavior of the crystal forms under the influence of humid air were determined. The three modifications show distinct differences by IR-spectroscopy, through which a distinction even is possible. The density of mod. I is lower than that of mod. II. The transition of mod. II into mod. I corresponds to an endothermic reaction; from this it follows, that between mod. I and mod. II enantiotropism exists. Mod. II is at 20 degrees C by about 44% less soluble as mod. I. Mod. III, which only can be produced by crystallizing the glassy solidified melt, has a negative heat of transition. That means that mod. III behaves monotropic with regard to both enantiotropic modifications I and II. Mod. I exists in form of small lamellae, mostly of irregular forms. Mod. II consists of rhombohedron grains. Because of this difference in habit, for mod. II one can predict the best properties in case of pressing tablets.

Effect of lifibrol on the metabolism of low density lipoproteins and cholesterol

Lifibrol is a powerful cholesterol-lowering drug of unknown mechanism of action. This investigation was carried out to determine whether the major action of lifibrol is to enhance clearance of low density lipoproteins (LDL) through the LDL-receptor pathway, and if so, whether the drug exerts its action by altering the excretion of bile acids (acidic steroids), the absorption of cholesterol, or the synthesis of cholesterol. In a first study, in two patients with complete absence of LDL receptors, lifibrol therapy had essentially no effect on plasma LDL concentrations; in two others who had a marked reduction in LDL-receptor activity, response to the drug was attenuated. These findings suggest that lifibrol requires an intact LDL-receptor pathway to exert its action. In a second study, in patients with primary moderate hypercholesterolemia, isotope kinetic studies showed that lifibrol enhanced the fractional catabolic rate of LDL-apolipoprotein B (apo B), but had no effect on transport rates of LDL; these observations likewise support the probability that lifibrol acts mainly to increase the activity of the LDL-receptor pathway. However, in a third study in hypercholesterolemic patients, lifibrol therapy failed to increase acidic steroid excretion, inhibit cholesterol absorption, or reduce net cholesterol balance. Furthermore, lifibrol treatment did not significantly reduce urinary excretion of mevalonic acid. In contrast, in a parallel study, simvastatin therapy, which is known to inhibit cholesterol synthesis, gave the expected decrease in net cholesterol balance and reduction in urinary excretion of mevalonic acid. Thus, lifibrol, like statins, appears to increase the activity of LDL receptors; but in contrast to findings with statins, it was not possible to detect a significant decreased synthesis of cholesterol, either from balance studies or from urinary excretion of mevalonic acid. This finding raises the possibility that lifibrol activates the LDL-receptor pathway through a different mechanisms which remains to be determined.

Genetics of lipoprotein disorders

The study of lipoprotein metabolism has led to major breakthroughs in the fields of cellular physiology, molecular genetics, and protein chemistry. These advances in basic science are reflected in medicine in the form of improved diagnostic methods and better therapeutic tools. Perhaps the greatest benefit is the improved ability to identify at an early stage patients who are at high risk for atherosclerosis, providing clinicians the opportunity to proceed swiftly with intensive lipid-lowering therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular complications. Recent clinical trials have shown that such an approach is not only cost-effective but saves lives while improving the quality of life. They also emphasize the important role physicians can have in prevention. More than half of patients with premature CAD have a familial form of dyslipoproteinemia. This review of the genetics of atherogenic lipoprotein disorders underscores the importance of identifying major genetic defects. It also stresses the need to take into account multifactorial etiologies and clustering of risk factors, as well as gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in assessing the atherogenic potential of a lipid transport disorder. Table 2 summarizes the key points in the diagnosis, clinical implications, and treatment of the major inherited atherogenic dyslipidemias.

New targets for lipid lowering and atherosclerosis prevention

The effectiveness of plasma lipid lowering in the clinic is well supported by a growing number of contributions, indicating the significant improvement in cardiovascular risk in primary and particularly in secondary prevention. While these studies have clearly indicated that the more potent agents for cholesterol reduction can provide a very effective help, other pathways of lipid metabolism have gained interest. These should be evaluated, in the hope of providing a more complete answer to the question of regulating lipid absorption, distribution, and tissue deposition. In addition to newer more potent systemic lipid-lowering drugs (in particular hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors), nonsystemic agents, including cholesterol sequestrants, are receiving attention. Some of these are effective at low concentrations, thus providing a potentially powerful tool for plasma cholesterol regulation. Another area of development is that of acyl coenzyme A cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors, i.e., drugs interfering with cholesterol esterification in tissues, particularly in the arterial wall; the major problem with these seems to be that of poor tolerability and of lack of definitive proof of plasma cholesterol reduction in humans. At present, drugs for the treatment of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are not available, with few exceptions; in this case, a better understanding of the regulation of lipoprotein(a) metabolism and of the potential benefit of treatment seems necessary. Elevation of congenitally low high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels may also be an important target: microsomal enzyme inducers have been tested, but have not provided a clinically significant response; drugs with a mixed endocrine-hypolipidemic activity possibly may prove effective. Other targets, e.g., the correction of the lipoprotein pattern characterized by "small low density lipoprotein," and the development of drugs specifically acting on the cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lipoprotein lipase systems, are being explored. Finally, new areas of development are in recombinant apolipoproteins (apo's) and in gene therapy. One case, i.e., that of apo A-I/HDL, is entering the clinical field; the mutant apo A-IMilano might provide help because of a combined cholesterol removing/fibrinolytic activity. In the case of gene therapy, at present, data on low density lipoprotein receptor replacement are encouraging. Further options, such as gene transfer in the arterial wall to induce vascular protection/disobliteration of occlusions, are also being tested.