Breath-holding in panic disorder

Hold your breath: Voluntary breath-holding time predicts defensive activation to approaching internal threat

Bodily disturbances, like dyspnea, elicit responses to regain homeostasis and ensure survival. However, this life-saving function can become hyperreactive, which may lead to the emergence of psychopathology. This study investigated whether maximal voluntary breath-holding time (mvBHT), a biobehavioral marker that characterizes sensitivity to respiratory stimulation, predicts defensive mobilization to cues signaling the proximity of a mild electric shock vs. a respiratory threat (shortness of breath elicited by forced breath-holding) and the opportunity to avoid threat delivery in 60 healthy participants. While the startle reflex, a measure of defensive mobilization, generally increased with the proximity of an inevitable threat, shorter breath-holding time was specifically associated with greater startle potentiation when anticipating a respiratory threat but not an electric shock. In contrast, when both threats were avoidable, the startle reflex was comparably inhibited, irrespective of mvBHT. This study suggests that mvBHT specifically predicts hypersensitive responding to an anticipated inevitable respiratory threat.

The Implications of the Diving Response in Reducing Panic Symptoms

Increased CO₂ sensitivity is common in panic disorder (PD) patients. Free divers who are known for their exceptional breathing control have lower CO₂ sensitivity due to training effects. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of cold facial immersion (CFI), breath holding and CO₂ challenges on panic symptoms. Healthy participants and patients with PD were subjected to four experimental conditions in a randomly assigned order. The four conditions were (a) breath-holding (BH), (b) CFI for 30 s, (c) CO₂ challenge, and (d) CO₂ challenge followed by CFI. Participants completed a battery of psychological measures, and physiological data (heart rate and respiration rate) were collected following each experimental condition. Participants with PD were unable to hold their breath for as long as normal controls; however, this finding was not significant, potentially due to a small sample size. Significant reductions in both physiological and cognitive symptoms of panic were noted in the clinical group following the CFI task. As hypothesized, the CFI task exerted demonstrable anxiolytic effects in the clinical group in this study by reducing heart rate significantly and lessening self-reported symptoms of anxiety and panic. This outcome demonstrates the promise of the CFI task for clinical applications.

Take my breath away: Neural activation at breath-hold differentiates individuals with panic disorder from healthy controls

There is neuroanatomical evidence of an "extended fear network" of brain structures involved in the etiology of panic disorder (PD). Although ventilatory distrubance is a primary symptom of PD these sensations may also trigger onset of a panic attack (PA). Here, a voluntary breath-holding paradigm was used to mimic the hypercapnia state in order to compare blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response, at the peak of a series of 18 s breath-holds, of 21 individuals with PD to 21 low anxiety matched controls. Compared to the rest condition, BOLD activity at the peak (12 - 18 s) of the breath-hold was greater for PD versus controls within a number of structures implicated in the extended fear network, including hippocampus, thalamus, and brainstem. Activation was also observed in cortical structures that are shown to be involved in interoceptive and self-referential processing, such as right insula, middle frontal gyrus, and precuneus/posterior cingulate. In lieu of amygdala activation, our findings show elevated activity throughout an extended network of cortical and subcortical structures involved in contextual, interoceptive and self-referential processing when individuals with PD engage in voluntary breath-holding.

Caffeine challenge test and panic disorder: a systematic literature review

This systematic review aimed to examine the results of studies that have investigated the induction of panic attacks and/or the anxiogenic effect of the caffeine challenge test in patients with panic disorder. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde and the ISI Web of Knowledge. The words used for the search were caffeine, caffeine challenge test, panic disorder, panic attacks and anxiety disorder. In total, we selected eight randomized, double-blind studies where caffeine was administered orally, and none of them controlled for confounding factors in the analysis. The percentage of loss during follow-up ranged between 14.3% and 73.1%. The eight studies all showed a positive association between caffeine and anxiogenic effects and/or panic disorder.

Respiratory manifestations of panic disorder: causes, consequences and therapeutic implications

Multiple respiratory abnormalities can be found in anxiety disorders, especially in panic disorder (PD). Individuals with PD experience unexpected panic attacks, characterized by anxiety and fear, resulting in a number of autonomic and respiratory symptoms. Respiratory stimulation is a common event during panic attacks. The respiratory abnormality most often reported in PD patients is increased CO2 sensitivity, which has given rise to the hypothesis of fundamental abnormalities in the physiological mechanisms that control breathing in PD. There is evidence that PD patients with dominant respiratory symptoms are more sensitive to respiratory tests than are those who do not manifest such symptoms, and that the former group constitutes a distinct subtype. Patients with PD tend to hyperventilate and to panic in response to respiratory stimulants such as CO2, triggering the activation of a hypersensitive fear network. Although respiratory physiology seems to remain normal in these subjects, recent evidence supports the idea that they present subclinical abnormalities in respiration and in other functions related to body homeostasis. The fear network, composed of the hippocampus, the medial prefrontal cortex, the amygdala and its brain stem projections, might be oversensitive in PD patients. This theory might explain why medication and cognitive-behavioral therapy are both clearly effective. Our aim was to review the relationship between respiration and PD, addressing the respiratory subtype of PD and the hyperventilation syndrome, with a focus on respiratory challenge tests, as well as on the current mechanistic concepts and the pharmacological implications of this relationship.

Caffeine challenge in patients with panic disorder: baseline differences between those who panic and those who do not

A proportion of patients with panic disorder (PD) display an increased sensitivity to the anxiogenic/panicogenic properties of caffeine. The aim of this study is to identify probable baseline differences between PD patients who panic and those who do not, after caffeine administration. In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over experiment performed in two occasions 3-7 days apart, 200 and 400 mg of caffeine, respectively, were administered in a coffee form to 23 patients with PD with or without Agoraphobia. Evaluations included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the DSM-IV 'panic attack' symptoms (visual analogue scale form), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), as well as breath-holding (BH) duration, heartbeat perception accuracy and heart rate. Only those patients who did not present a panic attack after both challenges ('no panic group', N=14, 66.7%), and those who presented a panic attack after at least one challenge ('panic group', n=7, 33.3%) were included in the analysis. The panickers, compared to the non-panickers, presented at baseline: significantly higher total score of the SCL-90-R; significantly higher scores on all the SCL-90-R clusters of symptoms, except that of 'paranoid ideation'; significantly lower BH duration. The present preliminary findings indicate that PD patients who panic after a 200 mg or a 400 mg caffeine challenge, compared to the PD patients who do not panic after both of these challenges, may present at baseline significantly higher non-specific general psychopathology--as reflected in the SCL-90-R--and significantly shorter BH duration.

Caffeine challenge and breath-holding duration in patients with panic disorder

OBJECTIVE

Breath-holding (BH) has been used as a simple probe to increase endogenous carbon dioxide (CO2). In patients with Panic Disorder (PD), lower baseline BH duration is associated with caffeine-induced panic attacks. In this paper, we assessed BH duration in PD patients in relation to panic attacks induced by caffeine intake.

METHODS

BH duration and state anxiety were assessed in 40 PD patients (12 males), both at baseline and after a 400-mg caffeine challenge test.

RESULTS

Patients panicking after caffeine administration (14 patients, 4 males) exhibited a significant reduction of their post-challenge BH duration, while no change of the BH duration was observed in non-panicking patients (26 patients, 8 males). Reduction in post-challenge BH duration was not related to higher anxiety levels--as reflected in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Form scores--independently of the occurrence of a panic attack. Panickers exhibited significantly lower baseline BH duration, compared to non-panickers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that in PD patients, caffeine-induced panic attacks are strongly associated with a significant reduction of BH duration at both pre- and post-challenge. Jointly, these findings suggest that in a subgroup of PD patients, sensitivity to endogenous CO2 accumulation may underlie both the lower BH durations and the caffeine-induced panic attacks. In this subgroup of PD patients, caffeine might exert its panicogenic properties through the exacerbation of patients' already pathological hypersensitivity to CO2 accumulation, as indicated by both the significant decrease of their BH duration at post-challenge and by their significantly lower baseline BH duration respectively.

35% Carbon dioxide and breath-holding challenge tests in panic disorder: a comparison with spontaneous panic attacks

Respiration and its control mechanisms may represent an important system involved in abnormal anxiety. Our aim was to compare the demographic and clinical features of patients with panic disorder (PD) with agoraphobia (DSM-IV) who had a panic attack after both the 35% carbon dioxide (CO(2)) test and the breath-holding test (CPA group), and compare them with PD patients who did not have a panic attack after both tests (NPA group). We examined 76 patients with PD who were administered a 35% CO(2)test and a breath-holding test within a 1-week interval. Anxiety scales were applied before and after each test. A panic attack was induced in 50 (65.8%) patients during the CO(2)test (chi(2) = 28.44, df = 1, P<.001) and in 40 (52.6%) patients during the breath-holding test (chi(2) = 15.35, df = 1, P = .036). All patients who had a panic attack during the breath-holding test also had a panic attack during the CO(2)test (n = 40; CPA group). Twenty-six (34.2%) patients with PD did not have a panic attack after both respiratory tests (NPA group). The CPA group had more (chi(2) = 21.67, df = 1, P = .011) respiratory PD subtype. In the CPA group, the disorder started earlier (Mann-Whitney, P<.001), had a higher familial prevalence of PD (chi(2) = 18.34, df = 1, P = .028), and had more previous depressive episodes (chi(2) = 23.59, df = 1, P<.001). Our data suggest that there is an association between respiratory PD subtype and the response to respiratory challenge tests: CO(2)and breath-holding. The CPA may be confirmed as a subgroup of respiratory PD subtype.

Comparison between hyperventilation and breath-holding in panic disorder: patients responsive and non-responsive to both tests

Our aim was to compare the demographic and psychopathological features of panic disorder (PD) patients who underwent hyperventilation and breath-holding challenge tests, and to describe the features of patients who had a panic attack after both tests versus those patients who did not experience panic after either test. Eighty-five PD patients were induced to hyperventilate (30 breaths/min) for 4 min, and a week later to hold their breath for as long as possible four times with a 2-min interval in between. Anxiety scales were applied before and after the tests. Patients who responded with a panic attack to both tests (BPA, n = 25) were compared with patients who experienced spontaneous panic attacks but did not panic in response to the two tests (NPA, n = 16). The BPA group had a significantly higher presence of respiratory symptoms during a panic attack. The criteria for the respiratory PD subtype were fulfilled in 18 (72.0%) BPA patients and in 6 (37.5%) NPA patients. The BPA patients had a later onset of panic disorder and a higher familial prevalence of PD. Our data suggest that there is a distinction between PD patients who were sensitive to both hyperventilation and breath-holding tests and PD patients who were not affected by the challenge tests. The panic attack may be a final common pathway for different types of stimuli, and respiratory tests may characterize different PD subgroups.

Suffocation and respiratory responses to carbon dioxide and breath holding challenges in individuals with panic disorder

OBJECTIVE

Findings showing that individuals with panic disorder (PD) are prone to experience panic attacks when inhaling CO2-enriched air have given rise to the hypothesis that physiological systems underlying the experience of suffocation may be important in the etiology of PD. In this study, we tested several predictions stemming from this view.

METHODS

Forty individuals with PD and 32 controls underwent both a breath-holding challenge and a CO2 rebreathing challenge. A wide array of physiological and psychological responses, including continuous measurements of subjective suffocation, was recorded.

RESULTS

Individuals with PD experienced elevated physiological reactivity to both challenges and greater levels of suffocation sensations during the rebreathing challenge. Furthermore, PD individuals who experienced a panic attack in response to the rebreathing challenge exhibited faster but shallower breathing during the challenge than did other PD individuals.

CONCLUSION

Findings are consistent with theories linking PD to hypersensitive brain systems underlying the experience of suffocation. The possibility that subjective suffocation was in part mediated by peripheral interoceptive disturbances (vs. brainstem dysregulation) is discussed.

CO(2) hypersensitivity in recently abstinent alcohol dependent individuals:; A possible mechanism underlying the high risk for anxiety disorder among alcoholics

Alcohol, administered acutely, is known to cause CO(2) hyposensitivity. CO(2) hypersensitivity associated with anxiogenic hyperventilation (HV) could reasonably be expected to emerge as an opponent process upon withdrawal from chronic alcohol use. To test this hypothesis, we applied two well-known methods to quantify CO(2) sensitivity in recently detoxified alcohol-dependent individuals and never alcohol-disordered individuals who are social drinkers. We found that the alcoholic group exhibited significantly greater CO(2) sensitivity than did controls in response to both challenges. Indirect evidence of chronic HV was also obtained. These findings implicate the effect of chronic alcohol use on CNS-based CO(2) sensitivity in heightening the vulnerability to disturbing anxiety symptoms and syndromes exhibited by alcoholic individuals. Future work must verify that pathological drinking actually causes the dysregulated respiratory responding observed in this study as is inferred in our conclusions.

Panic disorder: from respiration to the homeostatic brain

There is some experimental evidence to support the existence of a connection between panic and respiration. However, only recent studies investigating the complexity of respiratory physiology have revealed consistent irregularities in respiratory pattern, suggesting that these abnormalities might be a vulnerability factor to panic attacks. The source of the high irregularity observed, together with unpleasant respiratory sensations in patients with panic disorder (PD), is still unclear and different underlying mechanisms might be hypothesized. It could be the result of compensatory responses to abnormal respiratory inputs or an intrinsic deranged activity in the brainstem network shaping the respiratory rhythm. Moreover, since basic physiological functions in the organism are strictly interrelated, with reciprocal modulations and abnormalities in cardiac and balance system function having been described in PD, the respiratory findings might arise from perturbations of these other basic systems or a more general dysfunction of the homeostatic brain. Phylogenetically ancient brain circuits process physiological perceptions/sensations linked to homeostatic functions, such as respiration, and the parabrachial nucleus might filter and integrate interoceptive information from the basic homeostatic functions. These physiological processes take place continuously and subconsciously and only occasionally do they pervade the conscious awareness as 'primal emotions'. Panic attacks could be the expression of primal emotion arising from an abnormal modulation of the respiratory/homeostatic functions.

Clinical features of panic patients sensitive to hyperventilation or breath-holding methods for inducing panic attacks

Our aim was to compare the clinical features of panic disorder (PD) patients sensitive to hyperventilation or breath-holding methods of inducing panic attacks. Eighty-five PD patients were submitted to both a hyperventilation challenge test and a breath-holding test. They were asked to hyperventilate (30 breaths/min) for 4 min and a week later to hold their breath for as long as possible, four times with a 2-min interval. Anxiety scales were applied before and after the tests. We selected the patients who responded with a panic attack to just one of the tests, i.e., those who had a panic attack after hyperventilating (HPA, N = 24, 16 females, 8 males, mean age +/- SD = 38.5 +/- 12.7 years) and those who had a panic attack after breath holding (BHPA, N = 20, 11 females, 9 males, mean age +/- SD = 42.1 +/- 10.6 years). Both groups had similar (chi(2) = 1.28, d.f. = 1, P = 0.672) respiratory symptoms (fear of dying, chest/pain discomfort, shortness of breath, paresthesias, and feelings of choking) during a panic attack. The criteria of Briggs et al. [British Journal of Psychiatry, 1993; 163: 201-209] for respiratory PD subtype were fulfilled by 18 (75.0%) HPA patients and by 14 (70.0%) BHPA patients. The HPA group had a later onset of the disease compared to BHPA patients (37.9 +/- 11.0 vs 21.3 +/- 12.9 years old, Mann-Whitney, P < 0.001), and had a higher family prevalence of PD (70.8 vs 25.0%, chi(2) = 19.65, d.f. = 1, P = 0.041). Our data suggest that these two groups--HPA and BHPA patients--may be specific subtypes of PD.

A breath-holding challenge in panic disorder patients, their healthy first-degree relatives, and normal controls

Our aim was to observe the induction of panic attacks (PA) symptoms by a breath-hold test in panic disorder (PD) patients as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) and their healthy first-degree relatives. We randomly selected 26 PD patients, 28 healthy first-degree relatives of probands with PD and 25 normal volunteers with no family history of PD. They were induced to breath-hold for as long as possible four times with a two-min interval between them. Anxiety scales were applied before and after the test. Using specific PA criteria, 46.1% (n=12) PD patients, 7.1% (n=2) first-degree relatives and 4.0% (n=1) control subjects had a PA after the test (chi(2)=7.82, df=2, P=0.023). There was no heart rate, anxiety levels or breath-hold time differences among the groups. In this breath hold challenge test PD patients were more sensitive to breath-hold than first-degree relatives and normal volunteers.

Psychological and physiological predictors of response to carbon dioxide challenge in individuals with panic disorder

Past studies in nonclinical samples have found that suffocation fear, but not a behavioral index of carbon dioxide (CO2) sensitivity (i.e., breath-holding duration), predicts anxious response to CO2 challenge. These associations were examined in individuals with panic disorder while adding more sensitive indices of CO2 sensitivity. Consistent with the earlier studies, the authors found that suffocation fear predicted anxious responding to CO2 challenge but breath-holding duration did not. However, highly precise measures of CO2 sensitivity, not included in earlier studies, did predict anxious challenge responding. These findings support the predictive value and possible etiological relevance of both specific psychological variables and physiological CO2 sensitivity in panic vulnerability. Further work is still needed to determine whether the findings are specific to panic disorder.

Autonomic reactivity of panic patients during a CO2 inhalation procedure

The objectives of this study were to compare continuous subjective and physiological responses of panic disorder patients and normal controls during 5% CO2 inhalation. Psychophysiological responses of panic disorder patients (n = 42) and controls (n = 25) were monitored during baseline (20 min), 5% CO2 inhalation (20 min), and recovery (20 min). The data were compared at baseline and over periods of the experiment using analysis of variance. A subgroup of patients who experienced panic attacks during the CO2 inhalation (n = 12) were significantly different from the other subjects on baseline heart rate and on variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, skin conductance, and breathing variability (length and number of breathing pauses and length of breathing cycle variability). Inspection of the data showed that elevation in blood pressure and breathholding were present during some of the panic attacks, suggesting that some attacks may represent a complex psychophysiological response with elements of a "freezing" reaction, well described in animal experiments, which can quickly shift to a "fight/flight" reaction that is usually characterized by an increase in heart and breathing rate. However, some patients had only minimal changes in breathing and others had minimal psychophysiological changes during the time they indicated that they had a panic attack. Panic attacks are not homogeneous and may be characterized by a variety of physiological and cognitive responses. This may indicate that biological mechanisms of panic include abnormality in many functionally connected areas of the brain responsible for complex psychophysiological reactions to multiple threatening situations.

Voluntary breath holding in panic and generalized anxiety disorders

OBJECTIVE

Because breath holding causes arterial pCO2 to increase, we used it to test the hypothesis that in panic disorder (PD) a biological suffocation monitor is pathologically sensitive.

METHOD

Nineteen patients with PD, 17 with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and 22 normal controls took deep breaths on signal and held them until a release signal was given 30 seconds later. This was repeated 12 times separated by 60-second normal breathing periods.

RESULTS

PD patients reported having had in the past more symptoms of shortness of breath when anxious, and more frequent frightening suffocation experiences than the other groups. However, increases in self-rated anxiety between periods of normal breathing and periods of breath holding were similar in all three groups. Skin conductance, blood pressure, and T-wave amplitude reactions to breath holdings were also similar, but heart rate acceleration upon taking a deep breath was greater in GAD patients. Before and after individual breath holdings, end-tidal pCO2 was lower in PD patients than in normal controls; GAD patients were intermediate. Inspiratory flow rate did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our physiological results provide no direct support for an overly sensitive suffocation alarm system in PD. Lower pCO2 may be due to anxiety causing hyperventilation in patients prone to panic.

Voluntary breath holding: not a suitable probe of the suffocation alarm in panic disorder

Voluntary breath-holding duration was investigated in patients with panic disorder, patients with a mood disorder, and normal controls. There were no differences in mean breath-holding durations, but the pattern of scores was different among groups. Furthermore, the scores were influenced by motivational and cognitive factors. It is argued that voluntary breath-holding is not a suitable test to measure carbon dioxide sensitivity or suffocation alarm threshold in panic disorder.