Analysis of quiet spontaneous breathing as measured by spirometer and electrical impedance plethysmography

Linear relation between spirometric volume and the motion of cardiac structures: MRI and clinical PET study

BACKGROUND

In cardiac PET, CT, and MRI respiration is major reason for impaired image quality of small targets such as coronary arteries. Strong correlations between heart motion and respiratory signals have been detected but quantitative relation between signals and motion of cardiac structures in MRI or PET is not reported .

METHODS

Relation between spirometric lung volume or pressure belt signal and motion of coronary vessels in MRI was studied on nine healthy volunteers. Spirometry was further applied to (18)F-FDG cardiac PET study to determine quantitative relation between volume change and motion of center of myocardium activity (CMA) on nine CAD patients.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients (CC) between vessel motions and volume or pressure changes were 0.90-0.92 or 0.86-0.84, respectively. The linear equations based on volume or pressure changes derived 2.0-2.6 or 2.9-3.3 mm mean estimation error for vessel motions. In PET CC value of 0.93 was determined between volume changes and CMA motions. The linear equation based on volume change derived maximum estimation error of 2.5 mm for CMA motion.

CONCLUSION

The spirometric volume change linearly estimates motion of myocardium in PET with good accuracy and have potential to guide selection of optimal number of respiratory gates in cardiac PET.

The intra- and interobserver variability of impedance cardiography in patients at rest and during exercise

We studied the intra- and interobserver variability in the calculation of stroke volume by the impedance technique, using the recently proposed refinements in the electrode configuration and signal processing. Three groups of patients were included in this study: ten stable cardiac patients who underwent a diagnostic heart catheterization, ten patients 24-26 h after coronary artery bypass surgery and ten patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first two groups were studied at rest and the COPD group during submaximal exercise. The intra-observer variability was 4.2%, 3.9-4.0% and 6.0-6.9% for the catheterized, surgical and COPD groups, respectively. The interobserver variability was 4.3%, 2.6% and 2.4%, respectively. It is concluded that highly reproducible data can be obtained with the newly proposed impedance technique in patients at rest and exercise which may be comparable or superior to other techniques used in clinical settings.