Effect of oral contraceptive on liver function tests of women with schistosomiasis in the Philippines

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

The effect of low-dose combined oral contraceptive pills versus injectable contraceptive (Depot Provera) on liver function tests of women with compensated bilharzial liver fibrosis

This was an open comparative trial of two types of hormonal contraceptives, a low-dose combined oral contraceptive and the injectable depot-medroxyprogerone acetate, with a control group using an intrauterine device (copper T-380). Clients were recruited from bilharzial patients attending the maternal-child health and family centers affiliated with the National Liver Institute. Clients with compensated bilharzial liver disease were chosen and were divided into three subgroups according to their own preference for the method of contraception. Baseline, 2-, and 4-months liver function tests were compared, and abdominal ultrasound scanning of the liver was done. There was a nonsignificant change in liver function tests, and the portal vein diameter measured by ultrasound scanning was not changed with steroidal contraceptives. The use of combined oral contraceptive containing low-dose estrogen or using depot medroxyprogertone acetate injectables are safe and can be prescribed in cases with compensated bilharzial hepatic fibrosis with normal function.

A synoptic inventory of needs for research on women and tropical parasitic diseases. I. Application to urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis

The determinants of major parasitic infections in women have never been studied systematically. Much work remains to be done before vital gaps in our knowledge will be filled. The protocol presented here categorizes the determinants of parasitic diseases, and functions as an inventory for research needs and priorities. In this paper, the synoptic inventory is tested by matching it against the scientific knowledge of schistosomiasis that is at hand. Available data and existing lacunae are discussed. We conclude that the environmental, economic, socio-cultural, nutritional, genetic, biological and immunological factors which determine schistosomiasis in women are largely unknown. There is an urgent need for systematic and interdisciplinary investigations before appropriate and sustainable interventions can be initiated.