Mor E, Saadat P, Kives S, White E, Reid RL, Paulson RJ, Stanczyk FZ. Comparison of vaginal and oral administration of emergency contraception.
Fertil Steril 2005;
84:40-5. [PMID:
16009155 DOI:
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.110]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2004] [Revised: 01/24/2005] [Accepted: 01/24/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare the physiologic effects of vaginally and orally administered emergency contraception.
DESIGN
Prospective, open-label, crossover study.
SETTING
University research center.
PATIENT(S)
Nine regularly menstruating volunteers.
INTERVENTION(S)
Five subjects received 1,000 microg of levonorgestrel with 200 microg of ethinyl E2 (twice the standard Yuzpe regimen dose) vaginally, and the standard Yuzpe regimen dose orally 1 week later. Four subjects received 1,500 microg of levonorgestrel (twice the standard Plan B regimen dose) vaginally and received the standard Plan B dose orally 1 week later. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at frequent intervals after each dose.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Serum gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels measured at baseline, at the time of peak levonorgestrel, and 24 hours later.
RESULT(S)
Gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels were suppressed to a similar degree among the four regimens, with a return to baseline levels after 24 hours.
CONCLUSION(S)
We conclude that high doses of levonorgestrel found in emergency contraception regimens lead to a transient direct suppression of gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels. This effect is similar after vaginal and oral administration of emergency contraception. Therefore, the vaginal route of administration of emergency contraception regimens may be as efficacious as the oral route.
Collapse