Dose-finding study of a contraceptive ring releasing norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol

Advances in contraceptive vaginal rings: what does the future hold?

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptive vaginal rings (CVRs) are good contraceptive options because they do not require skilled providers, are self-administered, and show a higher stability of drug diffusion.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a review of the developments made with CVRs over the past number of years, while giving focus to the latest CVRs that have gone through clinical development. The author of the article also provides an expert perspective on the future of these useful therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that segesterone, an absorbable progestin that is used alone or in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) or E_2, is the CVR of choice at this present time. Indeed, segesterone has demonstrated safety and efficacy as a CVR and is also an appropriate option for lactating women, as they are not absorbed orally. However, good cycle control is important for improved CVR adherence. CVRs that allow the combination of more than one drug may unravel another multi-purpose use when combined with microbicides and could provide combined protection to women who wish to protect themselves from pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection.

Current status of contraceptive vaginal rings

Contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) offer a new, effective contraceptive option, expanding the available choices of hormonal contraception. Various ring prototypes have been evaluated: progestin-only rings and combined progestin-estrogen rings, as well as different combination of progestins and estrogens. The progestin-only ring is intended for continuous use, whereas the combined ring has been designed for cyclic 3-week in/1-week out use, although several studies have explored alternative schemes of extended use. However, only two ring designs have reached the market: NuvaRing, a 1-month combined ring that releases etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol, and Progering, a 3-month progesterone-releasing ring for use in lactating women. A one year Nestorone/ethinyl estradiol CVR is approaching the final stages of development, as the Population Council is preparing to submit a new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration. The main advantages of CVRs are their effectiveness (similar or slightly better than the pill), ease of use without the need of remembering a daily routine, user ability to control initiation and discontinuation, nearly constant release rate allowing for lower doses, greater bioavailability and good cycle control with the combined ring, in comparison with oral contraceptives. Current prototypes in development include rings releasing progesterone receptor modulators, which would provide estrogen-free contraception, as well as combined rings releasing estradiol, instead of ethinyl-estradiol, providing a safer profile. Furthermore, intensive efforts towards developing dual protection rings, providing both contraception and protection against reproductive tract infections, offer hope that this greatly needed technology will soon undergo clinical testing and will be in the hands of women worldwide in the near future.

Pharmacokinetic study to compare the absorption and tolerability of two doses of levonorgestrel following single vaginal administration of levonorgestrel in Carraguard gel: a new formulation for "dual protection" contraception

OBJECTIVE

The study was conducted to assess levonorgestrel (LNG) serum levels achieved after a single administration of two different doses of Carraguard vaginal gel containing LNG (CARRA/LNG), designed for use as microbicide and contraceptive for potential dual protection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized double-blind pharmacokinetic study conducted in 12 subjects enrolled at two centers. Each subject received a single vaginal administration of CARRA/LNG containing either 0.75 or 1.5 mg LNG per 4 mL of gel on Days 10-12 of the menstrual cycle. LNG serum levels were measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h after administration and for the following 7 days. LH and progesterone (for a preliminary evaluation of effect on the ovarian function) as well as SHBG were measured in the daily samples.

RESULTS

Serum LNG maximum concentrations (Cmax) were 14.1+/-2.1 and 11.7+/-2.7 nmol/L and Tmax was 12.0 and 6.0 h for the low and high dose, respectively, with large intersubject variability within the first 48 h. Mean levels at 96 h were 10% of Cmax. Differences in AUC between both doses were not statistically significant. SHBG levels decreased approximately 25% by Day 4 after administration. Luteal activity was observed in 3/6 and 5/6 of the subjects in the low- and high-dose group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the CARRA/LNG gel can sustain elevated serum levels of the contraceptive steroid for up to 96 h after a single application. The serum levels attained with the 0.75-mg formulation are in the range expected to perturb the ovulatory process as observed in some subjects. The lack of correlation between the administered dose and serum concentrations of the steroid may be related to a rate-limiting absorption of LNG from the vaginal mucosa. The results reported here suggest that the CARRA/LNG formulation has good potential to become a dual-protection method, possibly preventing conception and sexually transmitted infections.

Contraceptive vaginal rings releasing Nestorone and ethinylestradiol: a 1-year dose-finding trial

In a multicenter 1-year trial of contraceptive vaginal rings (rings) involving 150 women, three dose combinations of the progestin Nestorone (NES) and ethinylestradiol (EE) were compared with respect to effectiveness, safety and acceptability. Mean in vitro drug release rates for the three doses were 150 and 15, 150 and 20 and 200 and 15 microg/day of NES and EE, respectively. Each ring remained in situ for 21 days, removed for 7 days and then reinserted for a total of 13 cycles of use. We studied ring performance with respect to pregnancy and other termination events, adverse events, the extent of ovulation inhibition, serum drug levels and bleeding control. We also assessed the rings' effects on the vagina using a standardized colposcopy procedure. Seventy-two percent of the women completed the 1-year (> or = 350 days) study. In studied cycles, luteal activity (progesterone > or = 10 nmol/L) was noted in 17%, 7% and 12% of subjects with monitored cycles at the 150/15, 150/20 and 200/15 doses, respectively (p = .34). Two pregnancies occurred, both in subjects using the 200/15 microg/day ring. Breakthrough bleeding during ring use averaged about 2 days/year and breakthrough bleeding and spotting averaged about 7 days/year. In the entire trial, only two women discontinued because of bleeding problems. Medical conditions, chiefly vaginal problems, personal reasons and device loss or repeated expulsion were the principal reasons given for study discontinuation. Vaginal and cervical colposcopy, conducted with standardized techniques and standardized interpretations, revealed no elevated event incidence attributable to ring use. Clinical performance and adverse event profiles indicate that each of these 1-year NES/EE rings, used on a 21-day-in and 7-day-out regimen, provided women effective, acceptable and safe long-acting contraception under their own control.

Ovarian function during use of vaginal rings delivering three different doses of Nestorone

Contraceptive vaginal rings delivering various progestins alone or in combination with estrogen have been previously studied, showing adequate steroid vaginal absorption and acceptability by the users. Nestorone progestin (NES) is a potent 19-nor-progesterone derivative, inactive by the oral route, but an excellent option for vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ovarian function during 6 months of continuous use of progestin-only vaginal rings delivering 3 different doses of NES: 50, 75, and 100 microg per day. Blood samples were taken twice a week for 5 consecutive weeks during a control cycle and on months 1, 3 and 6 of use, for the measurement of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), and NES. A total of 87 volunteers randomly received each of the 3 doses. After an initial peak, NES serum levels remained fairly constant throughout the duration of the study at about 125, 200 and 250 pmol/L, respectively, decreasing slightly with time. Luteal activity occurred very rarely (1.2-2.6% of sampling periods) with no apparent difference between doses. Low E2 levels (< or =100 pmol/L) in all samples of a run were rare (5%) and only with the high dose ring (100 microg/day). E2 remained within normal levels (101-1500 pmol/L) in most of the segments studied. We conclude that the 50 and 75 microg/day NES rings provide adequate ovulation inhibition without hypoestrogenism, while the 100 microg/day ring may deliver an unnecessarily high dose.

Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis

BACKGROUND

Continued scepticism about the benefits of population pharmacokinetics and/or population pharmacodynamics, here referred to collectively as the population approach, hampers its widespread application in drug development. At the same time the sources of this scepticism have not been clearly defined. In an attempt to capture and clearly define these concerns and to help communicate the value of the population approach in drug development at Parke-Davis we conducted a survey of customers within the company. The results of this survey are presented here.

METHODS

All drug development programmes conducted over the past 10 years that included a population approach in data analysis and interpretation were identified. A brief description of the population analysis was prepared together with a brief description of how the resulting information was used in each drug development programme. These synopses were forwarded to relevant members of each drug development team together with a survey designed to solicit opinions as to the relevance and impact of these analyses.

RESULTS

The most frequent use of information derived from population-based analysis was in labelling. In all cases of drugs making to New Drug Application (NDA) submission the analyses resulted in information that was included in approved or proposed labelling. In almost half of the cases summarised here (5 of 12), population-based analysis was perceived to have resulted in information that influenced the direction of individual development programmes. In many of these cases the information was serendipitous. It is also noted that most of these analyses were not the result of clearly defined objectives and prospective analysis plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the population approach, even when applied retrospectively, may have value in complementing or supporting interpretation of other data collected during the course of a trial. Atypical systemic exposure is quickly and easily assessed for correlation with adverse events or exceptional efficacy in retrospective or ad hoc evaluation. Although we know of no direct evidence, it is possible that such use of population pharmacokinetic data has facilitated NDA review and approval by providing insight into the role of atypical systemic drug exposure in otherwise spurious events.

Efficacy, bleeding patterns, and side effects of a 1-year contraceptive vaginal ring

A combined contraceptive vaginal ring designed to last 12 months was tested at three clinic sites. This ring released approximately 1 mg of norethindrone acetate (NET-Ac) and 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol (EE) daily. A total of 60 women were enrolled to use the ring in a schedule of 3 weeks in/1 week out. Serum norethindrone (NET) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) levels were assayed twice weekly in cycles 6, 9, and 13. Mean NET concentrations between cycles 6 and 9 were relatively stable between 13 and 19 nmol/L but showed a 10%-21% decrease in all centers between cycles 9 and 13. Mean EE concentrations ranged from 75 to 103 pmol/L, but did not have the same decrease as NET between cycles 9 and 13. Cycles with progesterone peaks (> 9.6 nmol/L) compatible with some luteal activity occurred in 4% of cycles sampled in Sydney, 3% in Santo Domingo, and 26% in Los Angeles. Half of these cycles exhibited at least one progesterone value > 32 nmol/L with three of 18 occurring in noncompliant cycles. Heavier body weight was associated with increased probability of luteal activity. Based on serum estradiol peaks > 400 pmol/L, eight of 81 cycles appeared to have marked follicular activity with no luteal activity. No pregnancies occurred. Nausea was reported by about half the subjects in approximately 10% of the visits (mainly in the first 1-2 days in the first cycle immediately after ring insertion). Vomiting was reported by 20% of subjects early in the first cycle only. Headache was reported on occasion by nearly 50% of the women, but the relationship to ring use was uncertain. Vaginal discharge was reported by 17 women (82% of these were from one clinic). Of 60 women, 14 discontinued before completing the study, but only two discontinuations were for medical reasons. Small but statistically significant changes occurred in lipid levels in two of the three centers. All changes remained within normal limits and were similar to those seen with many oral contraceptives. It appears that this ring may perform slightly differently in different populations, but is a highly satisfactory method of contraception for many women. Minor modifications in design could provide higher levels of steroid release and in the later months of the ring life span would assure continuing high levels of contraceptive protection for heavier women.

A comparative study of two contraceptive vaginal rings releasing norethindrone acetate and differing doses of ethinyl estradiol

Two combined contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) each releasing approximately 1 mg norethindrone acetate (NET-Ac) and either 20 micrograms or 15 micrograms ethinyl estradiol over 24 h were tested at three clinic sites in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sydney. A total of 61 women were enrolled to use the ring on a schedule of 3 weeks in/1 week out for four treatment cycles. Serum estradiol, progesterone, norethindrone (NET), and ethinyl estradiol (EE) levels were assayed twice weekly in all four treatment cycles. Both CVR performed well, with no pregnancies occurring and only one cycle of luteal activity suggestive of ovulation (serum progesterone > 32 nmol/L) occurring with each ring (0.9% of cycles with the 1/15 ring and 1.2% of cycles with the 1/20 ring). Although there was significantly more luteal activity in women using the 1/15 CVR (5.9% compared with 1.2% of cycles), only three cycles with a marked degree of luteal activity (progesterone > 10 nmol/L) occurred among compliant women. Serum levels of NET and EE were consistently elevated during use of both rings. There was no significant difference between serum levels with the two rings because of wide interindividual variations, although both NET and EE levels tended to be higher with the 1/20 ring. However, there was a significant difference in EE levels between the women in Los Angeles and Sydney using the same dose rings. Total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL cholesterol values were not significantly changed during treatment. Triglycerides increased but remained within the normal range. Overall cycle control was good with both formulations, but there was slightly more cycle disturbance with the lower dose ring. There was no change in mean body weight during the study, and individual weight changes appeared to be idiosyncratic. Side effects were infrequent and similar to those reported with other steroidal contraceptive methods. Three women complained of vaginal discharge, one with accompanying itch and one with a vaginal Candida infection in cycle 1. Overall, both of these EE/NET-Ac rings performed well, with only minor and mainly nonsignificant differences in effect on serum EE, NET, E2, and progesterone levels and lipids, and on vaginal bleeding patterns.

Effect of different insertion regimens on side effects with a combination contraceptive vaginal ring

The study population included 159 women aged 18 to 37 years requiring contraception (60 in Sydney, 99 in Los Angeles). The design consisted of a 6 month study of a contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) releasing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg of norethindrone acetate daily over two successive cycles with a new ring on each of three different insertion regimens. A total of 831 woman-months of exposure were recorded, and 129 women completed the study. The overall incidence of side effects was similar in the two centers and differences between the insertion regimens were not observed. Transient nausea following insertion of a new ring (mainly lasting 0.5 to 48 h) was the most prominent side effect, with no significant difference between the insertion regimens (although the incidence tended to be highest with bedtime insertion [34%] and lowest with early evening insertion and temporary removal during the first night [27%]). Transient vomiting occurred in about 10% of women in the first 24 h after first insertion of a new ring. The incidence and severity of nausea was greatly reduced in cycle 2 with each regimen (6% to 9% of women). Nausea could be prevented by overnight soaking of the ring in water before use. Other side effects such as headache, dizziness, uterine cramps, breakthrough bleeding, weight gain, and ring expulsion occurred with similarly low frequency in all three insertion groups. One pregnancy occurred with probable ovulation between cycles 5 and 6, the only pregnancy recorded to date in studies with this ring. The study demonstrated that this effective and generally well tolerated CVR causes a relatively high incidence of transient nausea after insertion of a new ring, which is probably due to accumulation of ethinyl estradiol on the ring surface during storage. Acceptability is still high, and this particular CVR merits further development.