The impact of combined contraceptive vaginal ring on vaginal environment: an observational, longitudinal study

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) and vaginal microbiome using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 20 women for 8 weeks in an open-label study using CVR (NuvaRing^®) that delivered 15 mcg ethinylestradiol and 120 mcg etonogestrel daily. The vaginal microbiome was assessed at baseline and after 2 months by sequencing the 16S rRNA genes amplified from the total genomic DNA isolated from the sample.

RESULTS

Bacterial distribution richness and equity did not significantly change after 2 months, and the dominant bacterial strain was Lactobacillus crispatus. Only one woman with a history of vestibulodynia and recurrent vulvovaginitis showed an increase in bacterial biodiversity, with a switch to the relative abundance of anaerobic bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CVR does not adversely affect the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiome. However, special care should be taken in patients with a history of vestibulodynia and/or recurrent vulvovaginal infections.

Contraceptive vaginal ring-induced cholestasis in a patient with a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a heterogeneous group of liver disorders with a high recurrence rate. Patients with a history of ICP are at risk of developing contraceptive-induced cholestasis, especially if they harbour a biliary transporter mutation. We report the first case of drug-induced cholestasis associated with a contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) in a patient with a prior history of ICP.

PRESENTATION

Our patient was a women with a history of multiple pregnancies and spontaneous abortions and early and severe ICP. Two to four weeks after initiation of CVR, she developed signs and symptoms of cholestasis, which resolved after discontinuation of the CVR. A thorough investigation to exclude other plausible causes of cholestasis was performed, including a liver biopsy. Genetic testing revealed pathogenic mutations in both the ABCB11 and ABCB4 genes.

DISCUSSION

Although a history of ICP used to be an absolute contraindication for oral contraceptive pills (OCP), recent studies suggest a lower risk of cholestasis associated with low-dose oestrogen pills (20-35 mcg compared to the original 50 mcg). No previous case report could confirm the theoretical risk associated with the use of a CVR, which delivers a very low estrogen dose (15 mcg). The two biliary transporter mutations identified in our case could potentially explain the patient's susceptibility to the cholestatic effect of oestrogen.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates that CVR can trigger drug-induced cholestasis in a susceptible patient. While such cases should not discourage the trial of low-dose hormonal contraception in women with prior ICP, an appropriate follow-up is necessary to ensure early detection and treatment of drug-induced cholestasis.

Comparative randomized study on the sexual function and quality of life of women on contraceptive vaginal ring containing ethinylestradiol/etonogestrel 3.47/11.00mg or 2.7/11.7mg

The objective of the study was to evaluate the sexual function and quality of life (QoL) of healthy women on a new contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) containing ethinylestradiol (EE) 3.47 mg and etonogestrel (ENG) 11.00 mg (study group) manufactured with a new polymer composition compared to EE 2.7 mg/ENG11.7 mg CVR (control group). Fifty-eight women were randomly allocated to the study group and the control group. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) and the Short Form-36, were used to assess sexual function, sexual distress and QoL, respectively. The study included two follow-ups, at 90 days and at 180 days. The control group reported more adverse events, mainly breakthrough bleeding, than the study group. The sexual function scores in the women in the study group improved with respect to those of the control group both at the 1st (FSFI, p = .009; FSDS, p = .001) and at the 2^nd (FSFI, p = .001; FSDS, p = .002) follow-up. QoL of the study group improved at the 1^st follow-up (p < .05) and 2^nd (p < .01) follow-up. The control group improved their QoL at the 2nd follow-up (p < .01). The more gradual EE release of the new polymer composition could justify the behavioral differences of the women of the two groups.

Bone turnover markers in women participating in a dose-finding trial of a contraceptive vaginal ring releasing Nestorone and estradiol

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in the bone turnover markers CTx and P1NP during 6 months' use of novel continuous contraceptive vaginal rings delivering Nestorone (NES) 200 mcg/day and three doses of estradiol (E2) (10, 20, and 40 mcg/day).

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized trial enrolled 189 women who used two consecutive vaginal rings over 180 days. Frequent blood sampling permitted analysis of NES, E2, CTx and P1NP concentrations. The bone-turnover marker analyses included only women with complete sampling and excluded women with characteristics that might interfere with accurate measurement of bone markers such as afternoon sampling, poor ring compliance or recent pregnancy. We evaluated the change from baseline to 6 months in CTx and P1NP, stratified by ring dose and by average circulating E2 concentrations.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one women completed the study, and 82 women had complete data available for the bone marker analyses; the three dosage groups were balanced with regard to baseline characteristics. E2 concentrations remained low throughout treatment, regardless of which dose ring the participant used. Individual CTx changes from baseline averaged 27±56% (p<.01). Similarly, individual P1NP changes averaged 11±33% (p=.04). These increases were within the premenopausal reference ranges, and unrelated to treatment dose or to circulating E2 concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The low E2 dose of these rings was associated with low E2 concentrations and modest increases in serum bone turnover makers. Because we have only 6-month bone turnover markers and no direct evidence of bone loss or bone density change, these results must be interpreted with caution.

IMPLICATIONS

Nestorone, a 19-norprogesterone derivative, leads to complete ovarian suppression, which should yield excellent contraceptive effectiveness. To prevent potential adverse effects on bone, the NES contraceptive ring should be combined with higher doses of E2 than were assessed in this study.

Advances in contraceptive vaginal rings: what does the future hold?

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptive vaginal rings (CVRs) are good contraceptive options because they do not require skilled providers, are self-administered, and show a higher stability of drug diffusion.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a review of the developments made with CVRs over the past number of years, while giving focus to the latest CVRs that have gone through clinical development. The author of the article also provides an expert perspective on the future of these useful therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that segesterone, an absorbable progestin that is used alone or in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) or E_2, is the CVR of choice at this present time. Indeed, segesterone has demonstrated safety and efficacy as a CVR and is also an appropriate option for lactating women, as they are not absorbed orally. However, good cycle control is important for improved CVR adherence. CVRs that allow the combination of more than one drug may unravel another multi-purpose use when combined with microbicides and could provide combined protection to women who wish to protect themselves from pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection.

Phase II dose-finding study on ovulation inhibition and cycle control associated with the use of contraceptive vaginal rings containing 17β-estradiol and the progestagens etonogestrel or nomegestrol acetate compared to NuvaRing

PURPOSE

To identify at least one contraceptive vaginal ring that effectively inhibits ovulation and demonstrates cycle control that is non-inferior to NuvaRing^® (Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., The Netherlands) in terms of an unscheduled bleeding incidence, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%.

METHODS

This was a randomised, active controlled, parallel group, multicentre, partially blinded trial in healthy women 18-35 years of age. Subjects received one of six contraceptive vaginal rings with an average daily release rate of 300 µg 17β-estradiol (E2) and various rates of either etonogestrel (ENG; 75, 100, or 125 µg/day) or nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC; 500, 700, or 900 µg/day), or the active control NuvaRing^® (ENG/ethinylestradiol 120/15 µg), for three 28-day cycles.

RESULTS

Ovulation inhibition was observed in all groups as confirmed by absence of progesterone concentrations compatible with ovulation (>16 nmol/L) and absence of ultrasound evidence of ovulation. All investigational rings provided good cycle control, with the ENG-E2 125/300 µg/day group being associated with the best cycle control based on the numerically lowest incidence of unscheduled bleeding and absence of scheduled bleeding. Non-inferiority to NuvaRing^® with respect to the incidence of unscheduled bleeding could not be concluded for any of the investigational ring groups. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of combined estrogen/progestin contraceptives and similar across all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraceptive rings releasing 300 µg E2 and 75-125 µg/day of ENG or 500-900 µg/day of NOMAC provided adequate ovulation inhibition and cycle control and are generally well-tolerated. While non-inferiority to NuvaRing^® was not met, among the investigational rings, the ENG-E2 125/300 ring provided the best cycle control.

Continuous dosing of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing Nestorone® and estradiol: pharmacokinetics from a dose-finding study

BACKGROUND

As part of a program to develop a novel estradiol-releasing contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR), we evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CVRs releasing segesterone acetate (Nestorone® (NES)) combined with one of three different estradiol (E₂) doses.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, multi-centered study to evaluate a 90-day CVR releasing NES [200mcg/day] plus E₂, either 10mcg/day, 20mcg/day, or 40mcg/day in healthy reproductive-age women with regular cycles. Participants provided blood samples twice weekly for NES and E₂ levels during the first 60 days (ring 1) and the last 30 days (ring 2) of use. A subset underwent formal PK assessments at ring initiation, ring exchange (limited PK), and study completion.

RESULTS

The main study enrolled 197 women; 22 participated in the PK substudy. Baseline characteristics between the main and PK participants were comparable, with an average BMI of 25.8 kg/m² (SD 4.3). In the PK substudy, all three rings showed similar NES PK: mean area under the curve (AUC_(0-72)) 34,181 pg*day/mL; concentration maximum (C_max) 918 pg/mL; time to maximum concentration (T_max) 3.5 h. For E_2, the C_max occurred at 2 h, and was significantly higher with the 20 mcg/day ring (mean 390 pg/mL); 10 mcg/day, 189 pg/mL, p=.003; 40 mcg/day, 189 pg/mL, p<.001), and declined rapidly to≤50 pg/mL for all doses by 24 h. For all subjects, the median E₂ levels remained under 35 pg/mL during treatment.

CONCLUSION

PK parameters of NES were not affected when paired with different doses of E₂, but E₂ levels from all three doses were lower than anticipated and no dose response was observed.

IMPLICATIONS

While these novel estradiol-releasing combination contraceptive vaginal rings provided sustained release of contraceptive levels of Nestorone over 90 days, the E₂ levels achieved were not consistent with bone protection, and a dose-response was not observed.

"Per vaginam" topical use of hormonal drugs in women with symptomatic deep endometriosis: a narrative literature review

PURPOSE

We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of the vagina as a route for drug delivery and absorption, with a particular focus on the use of vaginal hormonal compounds for the treatment of deep infiltrating symptomatic endometriosis.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search through PubMed was performed to identify all published studies in English language on vaginal hormonal treatments for symptomatic endometriosis.

RESULTS

Main advantages of the vaginal route include avoidance of the hepatic-first pass metabolic effect, the possibility of using lower therapeutic dosages, and the reduction of side effects compared with the oral administration. Studies on endometriosis treatment mainly focused on the use of vaginal danazol (n = 6) and the contraceptive vaginal ring (n = 2). One pilot study evaluated the efficacy of vaginal anastrozole in women with rectovaginal endometriosis. Most investigations evaluated the vaginal use of hormonal agents in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis/rectovaginal endometriosis. Overall, a substantial amelioration of pelvic pain symptoms associated with endometriosis was observed, particularly of dysmenorrhea. A significant reduction in rectovaginal endometriotic nodule dimensions measured at ultrasound examination was detected by some but not all authors.

CONCLUSIONS

The vaginal route represents a scarcely explored modality for drug administration. High local hormonal concentrations might achieve a greater effect on endometriotic lesions compared with alternative routes. Future studies should focus on the use of the vagina for delivering target therapies particularly in patients with deeply infiltrating rectovaginal lesions.

Efficacy and side-effects profile of the ethinylestradiol and etonogestrel contraceptive vaginal ring: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability (side-effects profile), and compliance of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR) compared with combined oral hormonal contraceptives (COC).

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, POPLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and CINAHL databases were searched.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials comparing the CCVR with COC with a duration of at least 3 months between 01 December and 15 December 2015. The primary outcome was efficacy. The secondary outcomes were compliance, absence of withdrawal bleeding, breakthrough bleeding, nausea and headache. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistic and Cochran's Q statistic. Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models or fixed-effects models depending on the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

4368 records were identified, 2844 of which were removed after duplicates and 1524 records were screened. Of these, 1503 were excluded and 21 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. After removing another 7 articles, 14 records were finally included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The results show a trend to higher efficacy for the CCVR in preventing pregnancy (Peto OR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.26-1.04]) and a significantly lower presence of nausea (Peto OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.46-0.93]). More cycles were compliant in the CCVR group (Peto OR: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.12-1.32]) and fewer women reported breakthrough bleeding (Peto OR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.51-0.91]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that the CCVR is as effective and tolerable as the COC but with a better bleeding profile.

Coccydynia related to the use of a contraceptive vaginal ring

Coccydynia is a syndrome that rheumatologists encounter frequently in the form of tailbone pain, which is usually worse when sitting. Although the most common origin is trauma, there are several other possible causes of pain in the coccyx. We present an unusual case in which coccydynia developed shortly after the insertion of a contraceptive vaginal ring and remitted completely upon removal of this system.

Safety and efficacy of the NuvaRing® Applicator in healthy females: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study

INTRODUCTION

We assessed performance and safety of the NuvaRing® Applicator.

METHODS

We randomized women (18-45 years) to insert a placebo ring using the applicator or fingers-only and then vice versa. We assessed outcomes post-insertion and then 24-72 h later.

RESULTS

Insertion was 100% successful using both methods (applicator, n=163; fingers-only, n=162). A total of 8.6% (applicator) and 4.3% (fingers-only) of subjects reported at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (AE); all were mild. Subjects reported 5 applicator-related AEs (vulvovaginal pain, 4; abdominal cramping, 1). There was no vaginal bleeding within 15 h post-applicator use. Ring expulsions were rare (applicator, 1; fingers-only, 2).

CONCLUSION

NuvaRing Applicator is effective and well-tolerated (NCT02275546).

Quality of sexual life of women using the contraceptive vaginal ring in extended cycles: preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of the sexual life of healthy women who are using a contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) in extended cycles.

METHODS

Fifty-two women (18 to 32 years old) seeking hormonal contraception were enrolled in this prospective study. Women were to use a CVR releasing daily 15 μg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 μg of etonogestrel (ENG) for 63 days, followed by a four-day hormone-free interval, for two such extended cycles. At baseline and at the first (day 63-73) and second (day 126-134) follow-ups the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were administered to investigate, respectively, sexual behaviour and the quality of life (QoL). The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) was used to verify whether sexual dysfunction caused significant personal distress to the woman.

RESULTS

The FSFI and FSDS scores obtained at the first and second follow-up appointments detected an improvement with respect to the baseline score (p < 0.05). QoL measures of body pain, general health and emotional role improved at the first follow-up visit (p < 0.05); at the second one, all variables showed improvement (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to these preliminary data the CVR in extended cycles could improve the sexual function and the QoL of women.