IUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case-control studies

Reversible female contraceptives: historical, current, and future perspectives†

Contraception is a practice with extensive and complicated social and scientific histories. From cycle tracking, to the very first prescription contraceptive pill, to now having over-the-counter contraceptives on demand, family planning is an aspect of healthcare that has undergone and will continue to undergo several transformations through time. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current reversible hormonal and non-hormonal birth control methods as well as their mechanism of action, safety, and effectiveness specifically for individuals who can become pregnant. Additionally, we discuss the latest Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved hormonal method containing estetrol and drospirenone that has not yet been used worldwide as well as the first FDA-approved hormonal over-the-counter progestin-only pills. We also review available data on novel hormonal delivery through microchip, microneedle, and the latest FDA-approved non-hormonal methods such as vaginal pH regulators. Finally, this review will assist in advancing female contraceptive method development by underlining constructive directions for future pursuits. Information was gathered from the NCBI and Google Scholars databases using English and included publications from 1900 to present. Search terms included contraceptive names as well as efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action. In summary, we suggest that investigators consider the side effects and acceptability together with the efficacy of contraceptive candidate towards their development.

CT imaging of intrauterine devices (IUD): expected findings, unexpected findings, and complications

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a commonly used form of long-acting reversible contraception, which either contain copper or levonorgestrel to prevent pregnancy. Although symptomatic patients with indwelling IUDs may first undergo ultrasound to assess for device malposition and complications, IUDs are commonly encountered on CT in patients undergoing evaluation for unrelated indications. Frequently, IUD malposition and complications may be asymptomatic or clinically unsuspected. For these reasons, it is important for the radiologist to carefully scrutinize the IUD on any study in which it is encountered. To do so, the radiologist must recognize that normally positioned IUDs are located centrally within the uterine cavity. IUDs are extremely effective in preventing pregnancy, though inadvertent pregnancy risk is higher with malpositioned IUDs. Presence of fibroids or Mullerian abnormalities may preclude proper IUD placement. Radiologists play an important role in identifying complications when they arise and special considerations when planning for an IUD placement. There is a wide range of IUD malposition, affecting IUDs differently depending on the type of IUD and its mechanism of action. IUD malposition is the most common complication, but embedment and/or partial perforation can and can lead to difficulty when removed. Retained IUD fragments can result in continued contraceptive effect. Perforated IUDs do not typically cause intraperitoneal imaging findings.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and association between levonorgestrel and ectopic pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The use of levonorgestrel emergency oral contraceptives (EOCs) is one of the factors that may be associated with ectopic pregnancy. We aimed to investigate the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in EOC users and the association between EOCs and ectopic pregnancy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We searched for articles that provided the incidence of and the association between levonorgestrel EOCs and ectopic pregnancy in women of reproductive ages in CINAHL Complete, Medline, OpenDissertations, Scopus, Science Direct, and Thai Journal Online. The risk of bias was assessed by Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies or Risk of Bias 2. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

We retrieved 1839 nonredundant articles from the systematic search. The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of ectopic pregnancy was not statistically different from zero (pooled prevalence estimate = 0.029%; 95%CI: -0.006, 0.065; N = 9; I2 = 0) and rare. In addition, levonorgestrel EOCs increased the risk of ectopic pregnancy (OR = 6.17; 95%CI: 3.78, 10.08; N = 5; I2 = 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with extrauterine or ectopic pregnancy had higher odds of using levonorgestrel emergency oral contraceptives than those with intrauterine pregnancy. However, the prevalence of ectopic pregnancy is rare.

Complications of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Modalities

ABSTRACT

Long-acting reversible contraception has risen in popularity in recent decades and is becoming one of the more common modalities of contraception in the United States, with a growing adolescent population among its users. The 2 modalities of long-acting reversible contraception-intrauterine devices and subcutaneous hormonal implants/etonogestrel implants (referred to as Nexplanon in the US)-are beneficial for their excellent effectiveness, ease of use, and safety profile. This article reviews the pharmacology of these modalities, common complications and their presentations, and the initial evaluation and management in the pediatric emergency department setting. Where applicable, attention will be paid to problems unique to the adolescent population.

Ectopic Pregnancy Observed With Kyleena Intrauterine Device Use: A Case Report

Kyleena (levonorgestrel 19.5 mg), a type of intrauterine device (IUD), has an efficacy rate of 99% in preventing pregnancy. Because the overall failure rate of IUDs is low, ectopic pregnancy (EP) with IUD use is uncommon. This case reports an EP observed in a female with the Kyleena IUD in place. She had no known risk factors for an EP, which makes this case noteworthy. Ultrasound and surgery confirmed a 4 cm EP in the ampulla of the left fallopian tube. Insufficient evidence exists to conclude whether the Kyleena IUD has a higher risk of EP compared to other hormonal IUDs. As the Kyleena IUD becomes a more popular option for women in search of an effective contraceptive, patients and clinicians should be aware of this potential risk. Our case emphasizes that continued research on the prevalence of EP with Kyleena use is necessary.

The environmental risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy: An umbrella review

INTRODUCTION

Ectopic pregnancy(EP) is the implantation of a fertilized ovum outside of the uterine cavity. The incidence of EP has steadily increased around the world. The present umbrella review evaluated risk factors prior to conception associated with EP based on meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until June 25, 2021. All meta-analyses that had focused on assessing the risk factors associated with EP were included. We calculated summary effect estimates, 95% CI, heterogeneity I², 95% prediction interval, small-study effects, excess significance biases, and sensitive analysis. The quality of the meta-analyses was evaluated with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2).

RESULTS

Two risk factors including chlamydia trachomatis (OR: 3.03) and smoking (OR: 1·77) were graded as suggestive evidence (class III). IUD with pregnant control (OR: 10.63) and endometriosis for case-control studies (OR: 2·66) and tubal ligation with pregnant control (OR: 9.3) were graded as risk factors with weak evidence (class IV). Tubal ligation with non-pregnant control was a protective factor (class IV). IUD with non-pregnant control and endometriosis for cohort studies were not as risk factors for EP.

CONCLUSION

Two risk factors including chlamydia trachomatis and smoking were graded as suggestive evidence. IUD with pregnant control and endometriosis for case-control studies and tubal ligation with pregnant control were graded as risk factors with weak evidence. Strong evidence for risk factors of EP was not achieved, indicating the degree of uncertainty and bias, which bring an emergency to conduct further no-bias studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021281632).

[Evolution of contraceptive practices in France: An overview from 2014 to 2019]

OBJECTIVES

To study the use of reimbursed contraceptive methods in France between 2014 and 2019, with an analysis of the profile of users by age group and an analysis by type of prescriber.

METHODS

We conducted a national descriptive study using data from the Assurance Maladie Open Data database on the use of contraceptive methods reimbursed in France from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. We analyzed the number of users by year, by age group (<20years, 20-60years), and by prescriber (liberal general practitioner, liberal gynecologist, hospital practitioner, liberal midwife).

RESULTS

In 2019, 50.1% (5,345,122) of women of childbearing age used a reimbursed contraceptive method. Hormonal oral contraception was the leading contraceptive method used (42.3%), followed by the intrauterine device (6.2%) and the implant (1.6%). Use of combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraception had been declining since 2015 (-8.1 points), to the benefit of the micro progestin pill (+9.1 points) and the copper intrauterine device (+1.4 points). Among women under 20, the hormonal implant was the second most popular contraceptive method (1.2%), followed by the copper intrauterine device (0.8%) and the hormonal intrauterine system (0.2%). Among women over 20years of age of childbearing age, the copper IUD was the second most-reimbursed contraceptive method (2.4%), followed by the hormonal intrauterine system (1.6%) and the hormonal implant (1.2%). There are disparities in prescribing practices: in 2019, 51% of prescribers were general practitioners and 97% of them prescribed hormonal oral contraception.

CONCLUSION

The contraceptive supply in France is diversifying, although oral contraception remains predominant. Disparities exist between age groups of users and there is great heterogeneity in practices among contraceptive prescribers.

Ectopic Pregnancy in a Levonogestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device User: A Case Report

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices are considered to be a reliable contraceptive option with a low failure rate. The risk of ectopic pregnancy, however, if an unintended pregnancy occurs is significantly higher. In this study, we present a case of a tubal ectopic pregnancy in a woman with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in situ for one year. Our case emphasises the importance of having a high index of suspicion in women who have an intrauterine device in situ, presenting with a positive pregnancy test. We also discuss the importance of timely ultrasound examination and the management considerations of similar cases. The importance of urgent review and investigation of women with positive pregnancy test and intrauterine contraceptive device in situ, given the higher possibility of ectopic pregnancy, is highlighted by this case.

Case of rupture ectopic pregnancy with emergency contraception levonorgestrel 0.075 mg in a lactating woman

Levonorgestrel emergency contraception (LNG-EC) tends to make uterus unfavorable for implantation but does not prevent embryo implantation. Emergency contraceptives pills should be used with caution among lactating women who at the same time should be monitored closely for ectopic pregnancy.

Broad ligament pregnancy in the presence of an intrauterine contraceptive device: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal pregnancy though scarce is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Few cases till now have been diagnosed or managed by laparoscopy.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this study, a case of an abdominal pregnancy in a woman with intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) in situ and a history of cesarean section is described.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Our case was a brief description of a broad ligament pregnancy as a subcategory of abdominal pregnancy .It was located medial to the pelvic sidewall, lateral to the uterus, inferior to the fallopian tube and superior to the pelvic floor.

CONCLUSION

The pregnancy was in the location of the left broad ligament which was diagnosed on laparoscopic evaluation.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive

INTRODUCTION

The levonorgestrel oral emergency contraceptive is well tolerated and effective, however its use is still limited, mainly due to safety concerns.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the adverse events, and their prevalence, reported during the use of oral levonorgestrel emergency contraceptives.

METHODS

Four electronic databases and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard were searched. Studies that reported or investigated safety outcomes or adverse reactions during the use of levonorgestrel as an emergency oral contraceptive were included. Data on study design, demographics of levonorgestrel and the control cohort, and reported adverse effects were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 47 articles were included in this systematic review, from which it was shown that most of the adverse reactions were common and not serious. Uncommon adverse reactions identified included anorexia, ectopic pregnancy, exanthema, chloasma, miscarriage, and weight gain. Multiple serious adverse events, including convulsion, ectopic pregnancy, febrile neutropenia, stroke, abdominal hernia, anaphylaxis, cancer, ovarian cyst rupture, serious infections, and suicidal ideation, were reported. In addition, the prevalence of adverse events after a levonorgestrel 0.75 mg two-dose regimen and a levonorgestrel 1.5 mg single-dose regimen were not statistically different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common adverse effects of levonorgestrel were not serious. This systematic review shows that data regarding the adverse reactions of repeated use of levonorgestrel are scarce. Studies on the multiple uses of levonorgestrel emergency contraception are still required to ensure its safety.

Contraception in chronic kidney disease: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology

Even though fertility is reduced, conception and delivery are possible in all stages of CKD. While successful planned pregnancies are increasing, an unwanted pregnancy may have long-lasting deleterious effects, hence the importance of birth control, an issue often disregarded in clinical practice. The evidence summarized in this position statement is mainly derived from the overall population, or other patient categories, in the lack of guidelines specifically addressed to CKD. Oestroprogestagents can be used in early, non-proteinuric CKD, excluding SLE and immunologic disorders, at high risk of thromboembolism and hypertension. Conversely, progestin only is generally safe and its main side effect is intramestrual spotting. Non-medicated intrauterine devices are a good alternative; their use needs to be carefully evaluated in patients at a high risk of pelvic infection, even though the degree of risk remains controversial. Barrier methods, relatively efficacious when correctly used, have few risks, and condoms are the only contraceptives that protect against sexually transmitted diseases. Surgical sterilization is rarely used also because of the risks surgery involves; it is not definitely contraindicated, and may be considered in selected cases. Emergency contraception with high-dose progestins or intrauterine devices is not contraindicated but should be avoided whenever possible, even if far preferable to abortion. Surgical abortion is invasive, but experience with medical abortion in CKD is still limited, especially in the late stages of the disease. In summary, personalized contraception is feasible, safe and should be offered to all CKD women of childbearing age who do not want to get pregnant.

Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive factors and the risk of ectopic pregnancy (EP).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

United States.

PATIENT(S)

Nurses' Health Study II cohort comprising 41,440 pregnancies from 22,356 women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive factors self-reported in 1989 then updated every 2 years. Multivariable log-binomial regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ectopic pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

Incident EP was reported in 411 (1.0%) pregnancies. Former and current smokers had 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.55) and 1.73 (95% CI, 1.28-2.32) times, respectively, the risk of EP compared with never smokers. The risk of EP 10 years after quitting was similar to never smokers (aRR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.33). Women consuming ≥10 g/day of alcohol had 1.50 (95% CI, 1.08-2.09) times the risk of EP compared with never consumers. In utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (aRR 3.55; 95% CI, 2.51-5.01), earlier initiation of oral contraceptives (aRR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.70-4.09 for <16 years vs. never), intrauterine device use (aRR 3.99; 95% CI, 2.06-7.72), or history of infertility (aRR 3.03; 95% CI, 2.48-3.71) or tubal ligation (aRR 16.27; 95% CI, 11.76-22.53) also were associated with a higher risk of EP.

CONCLUSION(S)

Women who were current or former smokers, consumed ≥10 g/day of alcohol, were exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero, initiated oral contraceptives at earlier than age 16 years (which may be a marker of riskier sexual behaviors), and who had a history of infertility, intrauterine device use, or tubal ligation had a higher risk of EP.

Helping patients select long-acting reversible contraceptives

To reduce the rate of unintended pregnancies, patients should select a contraceptive option that fits their needs and lifestyle. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are a relatively safe and effective option. This article outlines the characteristics of available LARCs and identifies the appropriate method for specific patient populations.

Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy in the Presence of an Intrauterine Device

Ruptured ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of first trimester maternal mortality. The diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy should always be suspected in patients with abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding or syncope. While the use of an intrauterine device (IUD) markedly reduces the incidence of intrauterine pregnancy, it does not confer equal protection from the risk of ectopic pregnancy. In this report we discuss the case of a female patient who presented with a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum despite a correctly positioned IUD.

[Intrauterine contraception: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

To provide national clinical guidelines focusing on intrauterine contraception.

METHODS

A systematic review of available literature was performed using Pubmed and Cochrane libraries. American, British and Canadian guidelines were considered as well.

RESULTS

Intrauterine contraception (IUC) displays a wide panel of indications, including adolescents, nulliparous, patients living with HIV before AIDS (Grade B) and women with history of ectopic pregnancy (Grade C). Cervical cancer screening should not be modified in women with IUC (Grade B). Bimanual examination and cervix inspection are mandatory before device insertion (Grade B). Patients should not systematically undergo screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI) before device insertion (Grade B). Screening for STI should be preferably done before insertion but it can be performed at the time of device insertion in asymptomatic women (Grade B). Routine antibiotic prophylaxis and premedication are not recommended before insertion (Grade A). A follow-up visit may be offered several weeks after insertion (Professional consensus). Routine pelvic ultrasound examination in not recommended after device insertion (Grade B). In patients with IUC, unscheduled bleeding, when persistent or associated with pelvic pain, requires further investigation to rule out complication (Professional agreement). Suspected uterine perforation warrants radiological workup to locate the device (Professional consensus). Laparoscopic approach should be preferred for elective removal of intrauterine device from abdominal cavity (Professional consensus). In case of accidental pregnancy with intrauterine device in situ, ectopic pregnancy should be excluded (Grade B). In case of viable and desired intrauterine pregnancy, intrauterine device removal is recommended if the strings are reachable (Grade C). Detection of Actinomyces-like organisms on pap smear in asymptomatic patients with intrauterine contraception does not require further intervention (Grade B). Immediate removal of intrauterine device is not recommended in case of STI or pelvic inflammatory disease (Grade B). Device removal should be considered in the absence of clinical improvement after 48 to 72 hours of appropriate treatment (Grade B).

CONCLUSION

Intrauterine contraception is a long-acting and reversible contraception method displaying great efficacy and high continuation rate. In contrast, complication rate is low. It should thus be offered to both nulliparous and multiparous women.

Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices

Intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, also called long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), are the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. The major advantage of LARC compared with other reversible contraceptive methods is that they do not require ongoing effort on the part of the patient for long-term and effective use. In addition, after the device is removed, the return of fertility is rapid (1, 2). The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide information for appropriate patient selection and evidence-based recommendations for LARC initiation and management. The management of clinical challenges associated with LARC use is beyond the scope of this document and is addressed in Committee Opinion No. 672, Clinical Challenges of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods (3).

Pregnant with a perforated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and visible threads at the cervical os

We present a case in which a patient presented with a pregnancy of unknown location and normally rising human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels but with a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) present. The LNG-IUD had been placed 4.5 years ago. Although unintended, this pregnancy was desired. Strings were clearly visible and initial 2D ultrasound suggested intrauterine location of the LNG-IUD. The LNG-IUD could not be removed however. The patient was managed expectantly with close follow-up, serial beta-hCGs and serial ultrasounds until definitive diagnosis of the location of the pregnancy. The patient was diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy and during laparoscopy the body of the IUD was noted in the posterior cul-de-sac. When patients present with multiple competing clinical problems it is important to look at the patient as a whole, taking into account their desires, in order to construct a cohesive management plan.

Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)

Significant public health disparities exist surrounding teen and unplanned pregnancy in the United States. Women of color and those with lower education and socioeconomic status are at much greater risk of unplanned pregnancy and the resulting adverse outcomes. Unplanned pregnancies reduce educational and career opportunities and may contribute to socioeconomic deprivation and widening income disparities. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including intrauterine devices and implants, offer the opportunity to change the default from drifting into parenthood to planned conception. LARC methods are forgettable; once placed, they offer highly effective, long-term pregnancy prevention. Increasing evidence in the medical literature demonstrates the population benefits of use of these methods. However, barriers to more widespread use of LARC methods persist and include educational, access, and cost barriers. With increasing insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act and more widespread, no-cost coverage of methods, more and more women are choosing intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant. Increasing the use of highly effective contraceptive methods may provide one solution to the persistent problem of the health disparities of unplanned and teen pregnancies in the United States and improve women's and children's health.

Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review

BACKGROUND

Ectopic pregnancy is a potentially life-threatening condition occurring in 1-2 % of all pregnancies. The most common ectopic implantation site is the fallopian tube, though 10 % of ectopic pregnancies implant in the cervix, ovary, myometrium, interstitial portion of the fallopian tube, abdominal cavity or within a cesarean section scar.

FINDINGS

Diagnosis involves a combination of clinical symptoms, serology, and ultrasound. Medical management is a safe and effective option in most clinically stable patients. Patients who have failed medical management, are ineligible, or present with ruptured ectopic pregnancy or heterotopic pregnancy are most often managed with excision by laparoscopy or, less commonly, laparotomy. Management of nontubal ectopic pregnancies may involve medical or surgical treatment, or a combination, as dictated by ectopic pregnancy location and the patient's clinical stability. Following tubal ectopic pregnancy, the rate of subsequent intrauterine pregnancy is high and independent of treatment modality.

CONCLUSION

This review describes the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of tubal and non-tubal ectopic and heterotopic pregnancies, and reviews the existing data regarding recurrence and future fertility.

Association between levonorgestrel emergency contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter case-control study

Cases of ectopic pregnancy (EP) following levonorgestrel emergency contraception (LNG-EC) failure have been reported continuously, but whether there is an association between EP risk and LNG-EC is unclear. We concluded a case-control study to explore this association by recruiting 2,411 EP patients as case group, and 2,416 women with intrauterine pregnancy and 2,419 non-pregnant women as control groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounding factors. Previous use of LNG-EC was not correlated with the EP. Compared to women who did not use contraceptives, current use of LNG-EC reduced the risk for intrauterine pregnancy (Adjusted OR [AOR] = 0.20, 95%CI: 0.14-0.27), but did not increase the risk for EP (AOR2 = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.76-1.42). Furthermore, compared to women who did not have further act of intercourse, women with unprotected further act of intercourse were at a higher risk of EP (AOR1 = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.17-4.71), and women with repeated use of LNG-EC for further intercourse during the same cycle was also associated with a higher risk for EP (AOR1 = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.09-8.71; AOR2 = 2.49, 95%CI: 1.00-6.19). A better understanding of the risk of EP following LNG-EC failure can optimize LNG-EC use and thus reduce the risk of EP.

Intrauterine device quo vadis? Why intrauterine device use should be revisited particularly in nulliparous women?

Background

Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the contraceptive implant, are considered the best methods for preventing unintended pregnancies, rapid repeat pregnancy, and abortion in young women. An opinion paper of 2012 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends Mirena and Paragard for use in nulliparous and adolescent women. However, these IUDs are not designed for young women and are not optimal as they often lead to early discontinuation.

Objective

This article was written with the objective to respond to the urgent need to improve intrauterine contraception as it is likely that the objectives of LARC will not be met without significant improvement of IUD design. Anatomical variations in size and shape of the uterus are not sufficiently considered, producing harm and suffering, which often lead to early removal of the IUD.

Proposed problem solving

The article describes why IUDs should be revisited to meet the challenge of LARC and proposes how to solve these problems. The opinion statement presented here may be considered provocative but is based on hundreds of women with IUD problems who consult or are referred to the practices of the authors of this article due to the disproportion between the IUD and their small uterine cavity. The solution is simple but requires a revision of the current design of IUDs. One-dimensional (longitudinal) IUDs are likely to be the first option. Framed devices with shortened transverse arm and IUDs which adapt to the width of the given uterus are viewed as second best.

Conclusion

One of the reasons of the high unintended pregnancy rate in the USA may be the paucity of suitable IUDs. Also, the legal climate in the USA seems to be a problem for developers as many lawsuits have recently been reported. Clinical studies conducted in young nulliparous and adolescent women suggest that IUDs that fit well in the uterine cavity, like a shoe, result in better tolerance, less side effects, and last but not least, higher use continuation rates.

Contraceptive Use and the Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Multi-Center Case-Control Study

Objective

To evaluate the association between the risk of ectopic pregnancy (EP) and the use of common contraceptives during the previous and current conception/menstrual cycle.

Methods

A multi-center case-control study was conducted in Shanghai. Women diagnosed with EP were recruited as the case group (n = 2,411). Women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) (n = 2,416) and non-pregnant women (n = 2,419) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1∶1. Information regarding the previous and current use of contraceptives was collected. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs).

Results

Previous use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) was associated with a slight risk of ectopic pregnancy (AOR₁ = 1.87 [95% CI: 1.48–2.37]; AOR₂ = 1.84 [1.49–2.27]), and the risk increased with the duration of previous use (P₁ for trend <10⁻⁴, P₂ for trend <10⁻⁴). The current use of most contraceptives reduced the risk of both unwanted IUP (condom: AOR = 0.04 [0.03–0.05]; withdrawal method: AOR = 0.10 [0.07–0.13]; calendar rhythm method: AOR = 0.54 [0.40–0.73]; oral contraceptive pills [OCPs]: AOR = 0.03 [0.02–0.08]; levonorgestrel emergency contraception [LNG-EC]: AOR = 0.22 [0.16–0.30]; IUDs: AOR = 0.01 [0.005–0.012]; tubal sterilization: AOR = 0.01 [0.001–0.022]) and unwanted EP (condom: AOR₁ = 0.05 [0.04–0.06]; withdrawal method: AOR₁ = 0.13 [0.09–0.19]; calendar rhythm method: AOR₁ = 0.66 [0.48–0.91]; OCPs: AOR₁ = 0.14 [0.07–0.26]; IUDs: AOR₁ = 0.17 [0.13–0.22]; tubal sterilization: AOR₁ = 0.04 [0.02–0.08]). However, when contraception failed and pregnancy occurred, current use of OCPs (AOR₂ = 4.06 [1.64–10.07]), LNG-EC (AOR₂ = 4.87 [3.88–6.10]), IUDs (AOR₂ = 21.08 [13.44–33.07]), and tubal sterilization (AOR₂ = 7.68 [1.69–34.80]) increased the risk of EP compared with the non-use of contraceptives.

Conclusion

Current use of most contraceptives reduce the risk of both IUP and EP. However, if the contraceptive method fails, the proportions of EP may be higher than those of non-users. In the case of contraceptive failure in the current cycle, EP cases should be differentiated according to current use of OCPs, LNG-EC, IUDs, and tubal sterilization. In addition, attention should be paid to women with previous long-term use of IUDs.

The impact of copper-containing and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptives on cervicovaginal cytology and microbiological flora: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare vaginal microflora and cervical cytology before and after insertion of a copper-containing intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) or a levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

METHODS

Between April 2009 and February 2011, all women requesting insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive for family planning or noncontraceptive indications were enrolled. One hundred and eight Cu-IUDs and 42 LNG-IUSs were placed. Cervical cytological and vaginal microbiological findings before insertion and after 12 months were recorded.

RESULTS

With regard to cervical cytology, nonspecific inflammatory changes became more frequent (but not significantly so; p = 0.062) after one year of use of a Cu-IUD, whereas their prevalence remained unchanged among women fitted with a LNG-IUS. Colonisation by Candida spp. and mycoplasma infections were diagnosed significantly more often after one year of use of the Cu-IUD than at baseline. During the study period, women wearing a Cu-IUD complained significantly more frequently of vaginal discharge, pelvic pain, and increased menstrual flow.

CONCLUSION

Use of a Cu-IUD - but not that of a LNG-IUS - was associated with an alteration of the vaginal flora and showed a trend towards a higher frequency of nonspecific inflammatory changes affecting cervical cytology.

The Moral Nature and Practice of Natural Family Planning versus Contraception

The morality of contraception has not always been clear to many Catholics. Although the popes have been clear in their teaching that it is a grave evil, many theologians, priests, and Catholics either deny this teaching or, at least, are skeptical as to its truth. Many health-care providers seem unclear concerning the evil of this practice also. Many do not seem interested in discovering the possible good moral fruits of the practice of natural family planning. To understand the essential evil of contraception and how it differs from natural family planning in both theory and practice first requires a clear delineation of the sources for determining Catholic moral action. These are the object, circumstances, and intention. Each is objectively determined by the relationship of the act in question to an objective human nature which can be discovered by reason alone. To be good, all three of these factors must conform to human nature. The sexual act is evil while using artificial pills or devices to preclude birth and no circumstances or intention can justify one in doing such use. This not only denies children, but also precludes total self-giving love from being expressed in such an act. It has the further result of introducing self-fulfillment as the primary value into the most important natural act of all, the one which leads to human life. Natural family planning is not a form of contraception and so it is objectively completely different in its moral nature. The human decision to refrain from the sexual act is not contraception. When undertaken in the right circumstances and for the right intention, natural family planning is an objective cooperation with the justice due to the Creator in the transmission of life and not a denial of his rights. A physician who would assist in the performance of the sexual act in which the possibility of birth is excluded by prescribing some artificial means to preclude birth would be cooperating with the evil of contraception. One could not do this with a correct conscience.

Knowledge and likelihood to recommend intrauterine devices for adolescents among school-based health center providers

PURPOSE

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend intrauterine devices (IUDs) as safe and highly effective contraceptives for adolescents. Nevertheless, many U.S. providers do not recommend or provide IUDs to adolescents-a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to IUD provision for adolescents.

METHODS

A 36-item self-administered survey of knowledge and attitudes regarding IUDs was completed by 162 staff of New York City school-based health centers, including 69 clinicians (e.g., pediatricians and nurse practitioners) and 93 nonclinicians (e.g., social workers and health educators).

RESULTS

Half (55%) of all respondents would be likely to recommend an IUD to a patient under age 20 years. Respondents were less likely to recommend an IUD for patients with history of recent STD (31%), remote pelvic inflammatory disease (37%), and patients not in a monogamous relationship (38%). Whereas 77% of respondents indicated that IUDs are safe for adolescents, 18% of those respondents would be unlikely to recommend an IUD to a patient under age 20 years. While 86% of respondents knew that IUDs can be used in nulliparous women, 25% of those respondents would be unlikely to recommend an IUD to a patient who has never been pregnant. Additionally, 61% believed that counseling patients about IUDs would take more time than other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Misinformation about risks associated with IUDs and beliefs about patient eligibility may present barriers to provision. Apparent contradictions between knowledge and likelihood to recommend IUDs warrant further study.

A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women

Objectives Intrauterine contracepives (IUCs) are highly effective and safe for use in all women, including those who are nulliparous. However, many myths and barriers prevent more widespread utilisation. The objective of this article was to explore the health care provider (HCP), health system and user issues that prevent more widespread use of IUCs, particularly among nulliparous women, and to present the evidence that supports achieving greater utilisation of these devices.

Methods MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase were used to identify studies reporting attitudes and beliefs around IUCs, and clinical studies providing evidence of their risks and benefits.

Results HCP, health system and user factors limiting use of IUCs were identified. The most widely explored barriers in published studies are those at the HCP level. User barriers are less well documented and health system barriers are mostly assessed through indirect evidence. Many, but not all, of the barriers can be reduced through greater understanding of the evidence.

Conclusions Efforts need to be made to disseminate the evidence, which shows that few contraindications exist to IUC use. Addressing HCP lack of knowledge, training and confidence with IUC insertions, particularly in nulliparous women, could make a substantial positive impact on IUC utilisation.

Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a commonly used form of contraception worldwide. However, migration of the IUD from its normal position in the uterine fundus is a frequently encountered complication, varying from uterine expulsion to displacement into the endometrial canal to uterine perforation. Different sites of IUD translocation vary in terms of their clinical significance and subsequent management, and the urgency of communicating IUD migration to the clinician is likewise variable. Expulsion or intrauterine displacement of the IUD leads to decreased contraceptive efficacy and should be clearly communicated, since it warrants IUD replacement to prevent unplanned pregnancy. Embedment of the IUD into the myometrium can usually be managed in the outpatient clinical setting but occasionally requires hysteroscopic removal. Complete uterine perforation, in which the IUD is partially or completely within the peritoneal cavity, requires surgical management, and timely and direct communication with the clinician is essential in such cases. Careful evaluation for intraabdominal complications is also important, since they may warrant urgent or emergent surgical intervention. The radiologist plays an important role in the diagnosis of IUD migration and should be familiar with its appearance at multiple imaging modalities.

Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event

BACKGROUND

Adverse consequences of medical interventions are a source of concern, but clinical trials may lack power to detect elevated rates of such events, while observational studies have inherent limitations. Meta-analysis allows the combination of individual studies, which can increase power and provide stronger evidence relating to adverse events. However, meta-analysis of adverse events has associated methodological challenges. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and review the methodology used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event, following a therapeutic intervention.

METHODS

Using a collection of reviews identified previously, 166 references including a meta-analysis were selected for review. At least one of the primary outcomes in each review was an adverse or unintended event. The nature of the intervention, source of funding, number of individual meta-analyses performed, number of primary studies included in the review, and use of meta-analytic methods were all recorded. Specific areas of interest relating to the methods used included the choice of outcome metric, methods of dealing with sparse events, heterogeneity, publication bias and use of individual patient data.

RESULTS

The 166 included reviews were published between 1994 and 2006. Interventions included drugs and surgery among other interventions. Many of the references being reviewed included multiple meta-analyses with 44.6% (74/166) including more than ten. Randomised trials only were included in 42.2% of meta-analyses (70/166), observational studies only in 33.7% (56/166) and a mix of observational studies and trials in 15.7% (26/166). Sparse data, in the form of zero events in one or both arms where the outcome was a count of events, was found in 64 reviews of two-arm studies, of which 41 (64.1%) had zero events in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analyses of adverse events data are common and useful in terms of increasing the power to detect an association with an intervention, especially when the events are infrequent. However, with regard to existing meta-analyses, a wide variety of different methods have been employed, often with no evident rationale for using a particular approach. More specifically, the approach to dealing with zero events varies, and guidelines on this issue would be desirable.

Hypotension after medical termination of pregnancy: think outside of the uterus

BACKGROUND

Under usual circumstances, an ectopic pregnancy would not be generally considered in the initial differential diagnosis of shock after voluntary termination of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

To present a rare case of a young woman with shock after voluntary termination of pregnancy due to undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy with concealed hemorrhage.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department (ED) 3 days after termination of pregnancy with clinical features of shock. The patient had some evidence of infection and was initially managed as a case of septic shock secondary to possible complication of recent termination of pregnancy. Subsequent work-up led to suspicion of internal bleeding, and ruptured ectopic pregnancy was confirmed and managed successfully.

CONCLUSION

Ruptured ectopic pregnancy can present with a wide range of symptoms and under variable circumstances. Recognition of subtle signs of hemorrhage and consideration of the diagnosis of ruptured pregnancy in the ED will lead to early diagnosis and appropriate management.

IUDs and adolescents--an under-utilized opportunity for pregnancy prevention

Most pregnancies in adolescents are unintended and preventable if contraception were utilized. IUDs provide an under-utilized highly effective form of contraception. IUDs are appropriate for nulliparous women, including adolescents. IUDs do not increase: the incidence of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease after the 1st month of insertion, the odds of infertility, nor rate of ectopic pregnancy. Adolesecnts need more education about and increased access to IUDs. Practical points regarding IUD selection and insertion in adolescents are reviewed, including pain prophylaxis, anticipatory guidance, side effects and complications. In summary, IUDs are safe for contraception in most adolescents. IUDs are effective and eliminate the need for ongoing adherence and thus have the potential to decrease unplanned pregnancies.

The effect of patient gynecologic history on clinician contraceptive counseling

BACKGROUND

Contraceptive providers have an important influence on women's selection of contraception. Previous studies suggest that clinicians inappropriately limit use of intrauterine contraception (IUC). This study investigated the influence of patients' gynecologic histories on recommendations for IUC and other methods of contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

Videos of standardized patients varying by history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and parity were shown to clinicians at meetings of national medical societies. Participants indicated their contraceptive recommendations for the patient and whether they would have concerns were the patient to use IUC.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-four providers viewed one video of a standardized patient and completed the survey. Gynecologic history was significantly associated with recommendations for the contraceptive ring, contraceptive patch, and copper IUC. Many clinicians indicated that they had concerns about the use of IUC with respect to risks such as PID, infertility and ectopic pregnancy. Concerns about infertility and pain with use of IUC were related to gynecologic history.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient gynecologic characteristics affect recommendations for some reversible contraceptive methods. Clinicians continue to have concerns about IUC use despite evidence supporting its safety.

Ectopic pregnancy treatment by laparoscopy, a short glimpse

Ectopic pregnancy is a life-threatening emergency, the incidence of which is increasing globally. There are a number of factors predisposing to this condition; today, the most common of these is salpingitis. Due to advancements in diagnostic technology it is possible to diagnose this condition early and thus try to achieve a favourable outcome for the patient. Treatment options in the form of medical and surgical modalities are widely available. As minimally invasive therapy techniques are rapidly advancing, laparoscopic treatment has become the most popular and preferred method for treating ectopic pregnancy. Both salpingotomy as well as salpingectomy can be performed through the laparoscope. This paper gives a short glimpse at the predisposing factors and the diagnostic investigations available for ectopic pregnancy and an insight into its laparoscopic treatment. It also reviews the pregnancy outcome and laparoscopic treatment of cases at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Campus Kiel, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein.