Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: outcomes from a case-controlled study

AIM

To assess short- and long-term outcomes of redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (redo-IPAA) for failed IPAA, comparing them with those of successful IPAA.

METHOD

This was a case-control study. Data were collected retrospectively from prospectively maintained databases from two tertiary care centres. Patients who had a redo-IPAA between 1999 and 2016 were identified and matched (1:2) with patients who had a primary IPAA (p-IPAA), according to diagnosis, age and body mass index.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine redo-IPAAs (16 transanal and 23 abdominal procedures) were identified, and were matched with 78 p-IPAAs. After a mean follow-up of 56 ± 51  (2.6-190) months, failure rates after transanal and abdominal approaches were 50% and 15%, respectively. Reoperation after the transanal approach was higher than after p-IPAA (69% vs 7%; P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the abdominal approach for redo-IPAA and p-IPAA in terms of morbidity (61% for redo-IPAA vs 38% for p-IPAA; P = 0.06), major morbidity (9% vs 8%; P = 0.96), anastomotic leakage (13% vs 10%; P = 0.74), mean daily bowel movements (6 vs 5.5; P = 0.68), night-time bowel movements (1.2 vs 1; P = 0.51), faecal incontinence (13% vs 7%; P = 0.40), urgency (31% vs 27%; P = 0.59), use of anti-diarrhoeal drugs (47% vs 37%; P = 0.70), mean Cleveland Global Quality-of-Life score (7 vs 7; P = 0.83) or sexual function.

CONCLUSION

The abdominal approach for redo-IPAA is justified in cases of pouch failure because it achieves functional results comparable with those observed after p-IPAA, without higher postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach should be chosen sparingly.

Primary ileo-anal pouch anastomosis in patients with acute ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in ulcerative colitis (UC) for emergent or urgent indications in three stages. Since the three-step procedure imposes enormous demands on a patient, there was an attempt to introduce primary IPAA for urgent indications. The aim of this study was to compare early complications after Hartmann's colectomy (HC) and IPAA in a selected group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of 274 patients who underwent surgery for UC between 1996 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Finally, a group of 77 patients with acute form of UC entered this study.

RESULTS

All patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 32 (42%) patients who underwent HC, whereas group 2 comprised 45 (58%) patients after IPAA. There was no postoperative mortality. Respiratory failure occurred in 8 (24%) patients after HC and in 6 (14%) patients who underwent IPAA. Intra-abdominal sepsis developed in 4 (12%) patients after HC and in 8 (17%) undergoing IPAA. Fascia dehiscence was present in 3 (8%) patients after HC and in 4 (9%) with IPAA. Bowel obstruction occurred in 1 (4%) patient after the former operation and in 3 (6%) patients after the latter one. Wound infection was diagnosed in 6 (20%) patients after HC and in 9 (20%) after IPAA. The differences between the investigated groups of patients were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPAA could be performed for urgent indications only in the patients with no critical dilatation of the colon or with active UC but without signs of severe malnutrition.

Nutrition considerations surrounding restorative proctocolectomy

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli syndromes. Pouch construction uses the distal 30-40 cm of ileum, and there exists a potential for postoperative nutrition consequences. These include vitamin B(12) deficiency, iron deficiency, bile acid malabsorption, and abnormalities of trace elements, fluids, and electrolytes. Patients who have undergone an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure often describe specific food sensitivities that may require diet alteration, even more so than do patients with permanent ileostomy. There may be roles for postoperative probiotic supplementation in an attempt to decrease the rate of "pouchitis" and appropriate preoperative nutrition support to minimize the risk of perioperative complications.

Ileal reservoir with ileo-anal anastomosis: long-term complications

Coloproctectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis (CP-IAA) has been in use for 30 years. This intervention is the standard technique when surgery is indicated for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and for ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the surgery is safe with mortality of less than 1%, it is associated with a morbidity of 18-70%. We thought a literature review about long-term complications would be enlightening. Pouchitis is the most common complication; it occurs in 70% of patients over 20 years follow-up; small bowel obstruction affects 25% of patients and pelvic sepsis occurs in 20-30% within 10 years. CP-IAA can impact the patient's sexual life due to erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction, dyspareunia, and incontinence of stool during sexual intercourse. Nevertheless, patients with long-standing UC describe an overall improvement in their sexual function after surgery. The failure rate varies from 3.5 to 15%; major causes of failure are sepsis, unrecognized Crohn's disease, and poor functional results. Cases of dysplasia and cancer have been reported in the reservoir, but more particularly when there is retained colonic glandular mucosa. The transitional zone should be monitored whenever there are risk factors for colon neoplasia. The relatively high morbidity of CP-IAA should not overshadow the good functional results of this technique.

Medical management of patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis after restorative procto-colectomy

Restorative procto-colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis has become the most common elective surgical procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis and is becoming popular in those with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. The procedure itself is primarily carried out in specialist surgical centres but an increasing number are being performed and followed up in district general hospitals. These patients are now filtering through general surgical and gastroenterology clinics and are frequently seen in primary care. Pouchitis, an inflammatory condition of the ileal pouch, has become the third most important form of inflammatory bowel disease. As research develops in this area, other complications are being found. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date, evidence-based approach to the clinical management of these patients.

Association between fecal hydrogen sulfide production and pouchitis

PURPOSE

The beneficial effect of antibiotics in pouchitis suggests that an unidentified fecal bacterial product causes this condition. A candidate compound is hydrogen sulfide, a highly toxic gas produced by certain fecal bacteria, which causes tissue injury in experimental models. We investigated hydrogen sulfide release and sulfate-reducing bacterial counts in pouch contents to determine whether hydrogen sulfide production correlates with pouchitis.

METHODS

During incubation at 37 degrees C, the production of hydrogen sulfide, methylmercaptan, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen were studied using fresh fecal specimens obtained from 50 patients with ileoanal pouches constructed after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (n = 45) or for familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 5). Patients with ulcerative colitis were divided into five groups: a) no history of pouchitis (pouch for at least 2 years; n = 8); b) past episode(s) of pouchitis but no active disease for the previous year (n = 9); c) pouchitis in the past year but presently inactive (n = 9); d) ongoing antibiotic treatment (metronidazole or ciprofloxacin) for pouchitis (n = 11); e) currently suffering from pouchitis (n = 8).

RESULTS

Release of hydrogen sulfide when pouchitis was active (6.06 +/- 1.03 micromol g(-1) 4 h(-1)) or had occurred in the past year (4.71 +/- 0.41 pmol g(-1) 4 h(-1)) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than when pouchitis had never occurred (1.71 +/- 0.43 micromol g(-1) 4 h(-1)) or had been inactive in the past year (2.62 +/- 0.49 micromol g(-1) 4 h(-1)). Antibiotic therapy was associated with very low hydrogen sulfide release (0.68 +/- 0.29 micromol g(-1) 4 h(-1)). Pouch contents from familial adenomatous polyposis patients produced significantly less hydrogen sulfide (0.75 +/- 0.09 micromol g(-1) 4 h(-1)) than did any group of nonantibiotic-treated ulcerative colitis patients. Sulfate-reducing bacterial counts in active pouchitis (9.5 +/- 0.5 log10/g) were significantly higher than in those who never experienced pouchitis (7.38 +/- 0.32 log10/g), and these counts fell dramatically with antibiotic treatment. No statistically significant differences in carbon dioxide and hydrogen were observed among the groups not receiving antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch contents of patients with ongoing pouchitis or an episode within the previous year released significantly more hydrogen sulfide than did the contents of patients who never had an attack of pouchitis and those with longstanding inactive disease. The response to therapy with metronidazole or ciprofloxacin was associated with marked reductions in hydrogen sulfide release and sulfate-reducing bacteria. These results provide a rationale for additional studies to determine whether the high sulfide production is a cause or effect of pouchitis. The lower hydrogen sulfide production by pouch contents of familial adenomatous polyposis vs. patients with ulcerative colitis suggests a fundamental difference in gut sulfide metabolism that could have implications for the etiology of ulcerative colitis as well as the pouchitis of patients with ulcerative colitis.

The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in what manner ageing affects functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Short-term function and QoL after IPAA is good. However, patients are usually young, and little is known about the influence of time and ageing on long-term outcomes after IPAA.

METHODS

Using a standardized questionnaire, functional outcome, QoL, and complications were assessed prospectively in a cohort of 409 patients followed annually for 15 years after IPAA.

RESULTS

Follow-up was complete in the single cohort of 409 patients and functional and QoL outcomes summarized at 5, 10, and 15 years. Daytime stool frequency changed little (mean 6), while nighttime frequency increased from 1 stool to 2 stools. Incontinence for gas and stool increased from 1% to 10% during the day and from 2% to 24% at night over 15 years. The cumulative probability of pouchitis increased from 28% at 5 years to 38% at 10 years and to 47% at 15 years. Bowel obstruction and stricture were other principal long-term complications. At 15 years, 91% of patients had kept the same job. Work was not affected by the surgery in 83%, while social activities, sports, traveling, and sexual life all improved after surgery and did not deteriorate over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These long-term results in a single cohort of 409 IPAA patients are unique and are likely a more accurate reflection of long-term outcome than has been previously reported. These data support the conclusion that IPAA is a durable operation for patients requiring proctocolectomy for CUC; functional and QoL outcomes are good, predictable, and stable for 15 years after operation.

Female fecundity before and after operation for familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about the fertility of women suffering from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is scarce and inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to investigate the fecundity of women with FAP before and after operation, and to compare the findings with those of a general population database and women with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A questionnaire concerning reproductive experiences and waiting times to pregnancy was sent to all 230 women on the polyposis registers in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway in whom primary surgery had consisted of ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Data on the general population and women with ulcerative colitis came from an existing database. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The fecundity of women with FAP before operation and after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was similar to that of the general population. However, fecundity dropped to 54 per cent (P = 0.015) following proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, although it was greater than the postoperative fecundity of women with ulcerative colitis.

CONCLUSION

The significant reduction in female fecundity after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be communicated to young women with FAP before it is decided which surgical option to follow.

Inflammatory bowel disease

Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease consists of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus, and is also known as regional enteritis, terminal ileitis, or granulomatous colitis. Ulcerative colitis is limited to the colon and rectal involvement is present 95% of the time. Ten percent to fifteen percent of patients with irritable bowel syndrome cannot be clearly defined as having either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and are termed indeterminate colitis.

Enhancing release of peptide YY after near-total proctocolectomy: jejunal pouch vs. ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis

Reconstructing the enteric tract after near-total proctocolectomy by interposing a jejunal pouch between the distal ileum and the distal rectum slows small intestinal transit and decreases the number of stools per day compared to a conventional ileal pouch-distal rectal reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that the jejunal pouch operation brings about these results by protecting the ability of the ileal mucosa to secrete peptide YY, thus augmenting the hormonal ileal brake on small intestinal transit and decreasing the stool frequency. In five jejunal pouch dogs and five ileal pouch dogs, more than 6 months after the operation, serum peptide YY concentrations were determined before and at 30-minute intervals for 180 minutes after a standard meal. Fasting serum concentrations of peptide YY, measured by radioimmunoassay, were greater in jejunal pouch dogs (mean +/- SEM, 1340 +/- 143 pg/ml) than in ileal pouch dogs (804 +/- 52 pg/ml; P < 0.01). Postprandial peptide YY concentrations in jejunal pouch dogs were also greater at 30 minutes (jejunal pouch = 1524 +/- 131 pg/ml, ileal pouch = 913 +/- 67 pg/ml; P = 0.01) and 60 minutes after the meal (jejunal pouch = 1723 +/- 250 pg/ml, ileal pouch = 1001 +/- 70 pg/ml; P = 0.05) and peaked sooner (jejunal pouch = 81 +/- 17 minutes, ileal pouch = 147 +/- 12 minutes; P = 0.01). We concluded that the jejunal pouch operation results in greater ileal fasting and postprandial secretion of peptide YY than the ileal pouch operation. The greater release may account, in part, for the slower small bowel transit and decreased number of stools after the jejunal pouch operation.

The jejunal pouch as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy

Our hypothesis was that a jejunal pouch used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy would slow enteric transit, delay defecation, and decrease stool frequency compared to an ileal pouch so used. Twelve dogs underwent proctocolectomy; six had a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and six had an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. After recovery, postprandial mouth-to-anus transit was slower in jejunal pouch dogs (253 +/- 18 minutes [mean +/- SEM]) than in ileal pouch dogs (112 +/- 7.9 minutes; P <0.05). Moreover, jejunal pouch dogs passed only 4.1 +/- 0.3 stools during the 12 hours after eating, whereas ileal pouch dogs passed 6.3 +/- 0. 9 stools (P <0.05). The mean frequency of proximal ileal pacesetter potentials after feeding was less in jejunal pouch dogs (12 +/- 0.4 cycles/min) than in ileal pouch dogs (16 +/- 0.3 counts/min; P = 0. 01), and jejunal pouches had more action potentials (jejunal = 82% +/- 4.3% of pacesetter potentials had action potentials, ileal = 61% +/- 3.0%; P <0.05). In contrast, gastric emptying and pouch motility, emptying, mucosal integrity, and bacteriologic and histologic properties were similar in the two groups of dogs. We concluded that the jejunal pouch operation slowed enteric transit, delayed defecation, and decreased postprandial stooling compared to the ileal pouch operation.

Functional outcome of conversion of ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the functional outcome in 20 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis who were converted from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

From 1985 to 1997, 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (5 males; mean age, 39.1 years) and 8 patients with ulcerative colitis (5 males; mean age, 36.7 years) underwent conversion from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Clinical and operative data were analyzed retrospectively. Functional results were obtained by telephone interview in 16 patients (94 percent) after pouch construction. Four patients were not interviewed (2 were deceased, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 was not reachable).

RESULTS

Indications for conversion were uncontrollable rectal polyps (10 patients) and colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen after ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (2 patients), intractable proctitis (5 patients), colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen of patients with ulcerative colitis after ileorectal anastomosis (2 patients), and rectal dysplasia (1 patients). Mean follow-up time was 5 (range, 1-11) years. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was handsewn in 14 patients, and the remaining cases were double-stapled in 4 patients with ulcerative colitis. No intraoperative difficulties were reported in 13 cases; technical problems were related to adhesions (3 cases), difficult rectal dissection (2 cases), and stapler-related difficulties (2 cases). Postoperative complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis included small-bowel obstruction (4 patients) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis leak (1 patient). Patients with ileorectal anastomosis vs. those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had a better functional outcome with regard to nighttime continence (14 (88 percent) vs. 6 (38 percent) patients) and average bowel movements (<6/day; 12 (75 percent) vs. 4 (25 percent) patients). Complete daytime continence, 15 (94 percent) vs. 10 (62 percent) patients, was similar in the two groups. Physical and emotional well-being were similarly rated as very good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis with ileorectal anastomosis, conversion to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may be required. In view of the risk of rectal cancer or intractable proctitis, patients seem to accept the conversion in spite of poorer bowel function.

Cumulative risk of developing polyps or malignancy at the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in an increasing number of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two techniques are currently used to construct an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: (1) a double-stapled anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal and (2) mucosectomy with a hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis at the dentate line. Although this procedure is thought to abolish the risk of colorectal adenoma, an increasing number of case reports have been published concerning the development of adenoma at the anastomotic site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall cumulative risk of developing adenomatous polyps after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to compare the cumulative risk after either anastomotic technique. A total of 126 consecutive FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy were identified from polyposis registries in The Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Germany, and New York. Life-table analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of developing polyps in 97 patients with at least 1 year of endoscopic follow-up (median 66 months, range 12 to 188 months). A double-stapled anastomosis was used in 35 patients, whereas in 62 patients a hand-sewn anastomosis with a mucosectomy was performed. In 13 patients polyps developed at the anastomotic site, four with severe and four with moderate dysplasia. None of the patients developed a carcinoma at the anastomotic site. The cumulative risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site was 8% (95% confidence interval 2% to 14%) at 3.5 years and 18% (95% confidence interval 8% to 28%) at 7 years, respectively. The risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site within 7 years was 31% for patients with a double-stapled vs. 10% for patients with a hand-sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy (P = 0.03 [log-rank test]). Because FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with either a double-stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis have a substantial risk of developing adenomatous polyps at the anastomotic site, lifelong endoscopic surveillance is mandatory in both groups.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 203 patients: the Auckland experience

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become an established operation for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The results of a 15-year experience with IPAA are reported.

METHODS

Between September 1982 and June 1997, 203 patients had IPAA surgery. From a review of the charts, data were collected on the surgical procedure, the diagnosis and early and late complications. Pouch function was assessed by means of a postal questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 201 patients (median age of 32 years; 89 women) with complete records, 122 had J pouches, 65 had W pouches and 14 S pouches were constructed. The pre-operative diagnosis in 88% was ulcerative colitis and in 10% it was FAP. During a median follow-up time of 6.1 years the diagnoses were changed for 8% of the patients; in 4% the diagnosis was changed to Crohn's disease. The overall mortality was 1.5% (early = 2, late = 1). The overall morbidity was 62% (early = 17%, late = 52%). The pouch was removed or was non-functional in 9%. All patients with a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease have had their pouch excised. The median stool frequency was 4.0 (range 1.3-8.7) during the day, and 0.7 (range 0-2.1) during the night. The fewer night-time stools (J = 1.0+/-0.6; W = 0.4+/-0.5 P < 0.0001) and the reduced requirement of the W-pouch patients for anti-diarrhoeals (P = 0.004) were offset by the need for two W-pouch patients to pass a catheter to empty their pouches.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of patients who present for IPAA surgery and the outcomes observed in this series of Auckland patients are similar to those reported from major centres elsewhere.

ESTUDO DA MUCOSA ENTERAL DE RESERVATÓRIOS EM "J" EM CÃES

A proctocolectomia total com reservatório enteral é a principal técnica utilizada para o tratamento operatório de algumas doenças do intestino grosso. Com o objetivo de estudar as características da mucosa enteral de reservatórios em J, foram operados 36 cães. Após a ressecção de 5 cm do jejunum caudalis, para estudo-controle, os cães foram separados em dois grupos (GI e GII). No GI, foi realizada anastomose êntero-enteral término-terminal; no GII, foi feito um reservatório na forma de "J" no segmento cranialis, que foi anastomosado ao segmento caudalis da mesma forma que no GI. Aos 21, 42 e 63 dias de pós-operatório, foi realizada eutanásia de 6 cães de cada grupo para estudos macroscópico e microscópico, incluindo-se contagens celulares e medidas da lâmina própria da mucosa enteral. Os resultados revelaram, aos 21 dias, edema e enantema, à macroscopia, e necrose à microscopia, em freqüências semelhantes nos dois grupos. Aos 42 e 63 dias, essas alterações diminuiram ou desapareceram no GI e persistiram no GII. Somente neste último foram observadas úlceras à macroscopia aos 21 dias (2 cães) e 42 dias (1 cão). Não houve diferença significante à presença de abscesso, à microscopia, nos dois grupos. Na contagem celular, já aos 21 dias houve aumento da densidade volumétrica de neutrófilos, macrófagos, eosinófilos, plasmócitos e linfócitos nos dois grupos. Todas as células, exceto eosinófilos, apresentavam-se com densidade volumétrica significantemente maior no GII, aos 63 dias. O diâmetro transversal da lâmina própria, excluindo a altura dos vilos, apresentou-se significantemente maior no GII aos 63 dias de pós-operatório. Concluiu-se que a mucosa enteral de reservatórios em J, em cães, apresenta modificações do padrão de normalidade macroscópica e microscópica, entre as quais o aumento da densidade volumétrica de células inflamatórias.

Surgical management of a long efferent loop after J-pouch ileoanal reconstruction

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a simple and effective repair of a poorly constructed ileal J-pouch with an extensive long efferent limb.

METHOD

A retrospective case review was performed.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure described preserves additional ileum and enlarges the ileal reservoir. The procedure succeeded in resolving the patient's complaints of partial obstruction, weight loss, and increased stool frequency. At five-month follow-up, the patient was doing well with three to six stools daily. Evaluation of the new ileal J-pouch showed no signs of inflammation, and the pouch size measured more than 20 cm compared with 12 cm preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of a long efferent limb by this simple stapling technique is feasible, simple, and effective, with an excellent clinical result. It preserves valuable small intestine and enlarges the capacity of the reservoir, leading to better functional outcome.

Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients in whom the anal mucosa is excised by handsewn techniques to those in whom the mucosa is preserved using stapling techniques.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy. Controversy exists over whether preserving the transitional mucosa of the anal canal improves outcomes.

METHODS

Forty-one patients (23 men, 18 women) were randomized to either endorectal mucosectomy and handsewn IPAA or to double-stapled IPAA, which spared the anal transition zone. All patients were diverted for 2 to 3 months. Nine patients were excluded. Preoperative functional status was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry. Twenty-four patients underwent more extensive physiologic evaluation, including scintigraphic anopouch angle studies and pudendel never terminal motor latency a mean of 6 months after surgery. Quality of life similarly was estimated before surgery and after surgery. Univariate analysis using Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were identical demographically. Overall outcomes in both groups were good. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent the handsewn technique and 35% of patients who underwent the double-stapled technique experienced a postoperative complication. Resting anal canal pressures were higher in the patients who underwent the stapled technique, but other physiologic parameters were similar between groups. Night-time fecal incontinence occurred less frequently in the stapled group but not significantly. The number of stools per 24 hours decreased from preoperative values in both groups. After IPAA, quality of life improved promptly in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled IPAA, which preserves the mucosa of the anal transition zone, confers no apparent early advantage in terms of decreased stool frequency or fewer episodes of fecal incontinence compared to handsewn IPAA, which excises the mucosa. Higher resting pressures in the stapled group coupled with a trend toward less night-time incontinence, however, may portend better function in the stapled group over time. Both operations are safe and result in rapid and profound improvement in quality of life.

Afferent limb obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

Small-bowel obstruction is a common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Acute angulation of the afferent limb at the pouch inlet is the cause of obstruction in a subset of patients requiring laparotomy.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Lahey Clinic ileoanal pouch registry, a prospective computerized database of all patients who have undergone IPAA since 1980. Records of patients who were identified as having afferent limb obstruction as a cause of bowel obstruction after IPAA were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 567 patients had undergone total proctocolectomy and ileoanal J-pouch at time of the study. Of 122 patients with one or more episodes of obstruction after IPAA, 48 required operative intervention. Afferent limb obstruction was identified as the cause of obstruction in six patients (12 percent). The most common presentation was recurrent partial obstruction (4 of 6 patients). Contrast small-bowel series and enemas were suggestive of obstruction in four of six patients, the most consistent radiographic finding being small-bowel dilation to the level of the pouch inlet. All patients underwent laparotomy for unresolved obstruction. Intraoperatively, the afferent limb was found to be adherent posterior to the pouch, causing acute angulation at the pouch inlet. Rather than risk injury to the pouch or its mesentery, the obstruction was bypassed by side-to-side anastomosis of the afferent limb to the pouch (enteroenterostomy) in five of six patients. One patient underwent ileostomy only because of technical considerations. Two patients required re-exploration and pexy of the afferent limb to the pelvic sidewall (pouchopexy) to relieve recurrent afferent limb obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Afferent limb obstruction should be suspected in patients with recurrent obstruction after IPAA. Bypass of the obstructed segment from distal ileum to the pouch is safe and effective treatment. Because of the risk of recurrent afferent limb angulation, concurrent pouchopexy should be considered.

Disconnection, pouch revision and reconnection of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the outcome of patients with a dysfunctional pelvic ileal reservoir in whom disconnection of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), pouch revision and reanastomosis had been carried out. There were 23 patients (15 women). At the revision operation functional problems were found to be due to a long efferent spout (nine patients), sepsis and/or fistula (four), a redundant blind limb (three), a twisted pouch (three), anastomotic problems (three) or no reservoir (one). The pouch was salvaged in 16 patients and a new pouch was constructed in seven. The pouch-anal anastomosis was resutured in 22 patients and stapled in one. Postoperative complications (all minor) occurred in six patients. Two patients underwent two revision of IPAA. At a median follow-up of 5 (range 1-10) years, 11 patients reported good to excellent function, five reported fair function and one reported recurrent pouchitis. Revision surgery was unsuccessful in six of 23 patients (three had gross incontinence, two excessive bowel movements and one Crohn's disease), and they subsequently underwent pouch excision. It is concluded that revision of an ileal reservoir and IPAA can be undertaken safely with good results in carefully selected patients.

Changing referral patterns for surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether referral patterns for surgical treatment among patients with chronic ulcerative colitis have changed in recent years, especially in view of the introduction of a new operation, the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 1976 and December 1986, 981 patients underwent proctocolectomy at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Brooke ileostomy (N = 300), colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (N = 33), proctocolectomy with Kock pouch (N = 180), or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) (N = 468) was performed. The indications for surgical intervention were categorized as emergent or elective, the latter including intractability, cancer, and cancer prophylaxis. For analysis, the duration from diagnosis of disease to operation, indications for surgical treatment, and types of operation were subdivided into pre-IPAA era (before 1981) and post-IPAA era (from 1981 onward) for the entire group and for distant versus local patients.

RESULTS

More continence-preserving operations were done in 1981 and thereafter (76%) than before 1981 (46%). In the later segment of the study period in comparison with before 1981, fewer operations were done for emergent reasons (4% versus 8%) and a greater percentage of operations were done for elective indications, especially intractability (74% versus 61%). With the advent of IPAA in 1981, patients underwent operation sooner after the diagnosis was made (7.4 years versus 8.6 years before 1981). A smaller proportion of patients underwent operation for cancer prophylaxis during 1981 through 1986 (19%), however, than before 1981 (28%).

CONCLUSION

Referral patterns for surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis have changed in recent years--patients are being referred for operation sooner, before complications develop that necessitate emergent procedures. Although the changed referral pattern may be due to the availability of IPAA, other factors may also have a role.

Anal transitional zone and columnar cuff in restorative proctocolectomy

The popularity of double stapling the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis probably owes more to the technical ease it brings than to histological considerations or functional results. It is preservation of a 'columnar cuff' of mucosa, rather than the restricted site of the anal transitional zone, that should be the focus of research with respect to long-term risk of malignancy and inflammatory complications. If cancer is present in colon that has been removed for ulcerative colitis, there is a 25 per cent incidence of dysplasia in the columnar cuff in the short term. In other circumstances, those who are spared from carcinoma by colectomy are likely to have a similar risk of developing dysplastic change in the columnar cuff with longer follow-up. Double stapling the pouch-anal anastomosis and preserving the anal canal mucosa improves function, but long-term surveillance of the columnar cuff is then required, including biopsies.

Long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease is, however, a contraindication. Because distinction between UC and Crohn's disease can be difficult, some patients with Crohn's disease inadvertently undergo IPAA. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone IPAA.

METHODS

A total of 37 patients (20 men) were studied. Each had undergone mucosectomy with handsewn IPAA (J-pouch, n = 35; S-pouch, n = 1; W-pouch, n = 1). Histologic examination of the resected specimen at time of IPAA showed features of ulcerative colitiis (n = 22), indeterminate colitis (n = 9), or Crohn's disease (n = 6). The stoma was closed in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 11 of 37 patients developed complex fistulas (pouch-cutaneous (n = 6), pouch-vaginal (n = 4), or pouch-vesical (n = 1). Crohn's disease has recurred in the pouch (n = 20), anal canal (n = 4), pouch and anal canal (n = 10), and elsewhere (n = 3). After ten years (range, 3-14), the pouch remains in situ in 20 patients in whom frequency of bowel movement is seven times (3-10)/24 hours, in situ but defunctioned in seven patients, and excised in ten patients (failure rate, 45 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Inadvertent IPAA for Crohn's disease is associated with a high rate of failure (45 percent) but an acceptable long-term functional result if the pouch can be kept in situ.

Long-term causes of death following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the overall long-term causes of death in a large series of patients who were undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA at the Mayo Clinic affiliated hospitals between January 1981 and October 1994 were reviewed to determine overall mortality, cause, and timing of death.

RESULTS

A total of 1,603 patients underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA reconstruction (1,407 for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC), 187 for familial polyposis (FAP), and 9 for other diagnoses). Thirty-two patients have died, with an overall mortality rate of 2 percent. Mean age at time of death was 40 (23-60) years. There was no significant difference in overall mortality between patients with CUC and patients with FAP. Three deaths occurred postoperatively (0.2 percent) because of pulmonary embolism, perforated gastric ulcer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Late deaths occurred in 29 patients (1.8 percent), 10 months to 10.4 years after the operation. The most common cause of late death was cancer, including colon and rectal carcinoma (10 patients), hematologic malignancies (4 patients), cholangiocarcinoma (3 patients), and germ-cell carcinoma (1 patient). Four patients died from unrelated sepsis, two died following myocardial infarction, two patients died from complications of subsequent orthopedic surgery, and one patient died of cirrhosis. Two additional patients committed suicide. No late deaths were directly attributable to the IPAA procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Proctocolectomy with IPAA is a safe procedure. Operative mortality is low, and late deaths are related to carcinogenic and extracolonic manifestations of underlying or unrelated coexisting diseases and events.

Anorectal and pelvic floor function. Relevance of continence, incontinence, and constipation

Anorectal tests need to be tailored to the presentation of the individual patient. Clearly the tests are most useful when they identify anatomic or physiologic abnormalities for which there are successful treatments. For the incontinent patient, anal manometry is the most useful test. Sphincter injuries should be repaired, whereas neurogenic incontinence is best treated initially with biofeedback. Three tests are more useful for the constipated patient: colonic transit time, degree of pelvic floor descent on straining, and balloon expulsion. Colonic inertia responds to total colectomy and pelvic floor dysfunction to biofeedback. Meanwhile, patients with irritable bowel syndrome require rereferral back to their physicians.

Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Relation with anal manometry and fecal continence

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to visualize supposed defects of the internal anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) by anal endosonography and to relate these findings with anal manometry and fecal continence.

METHODS

We investigated 23 patients, visualized the sphincter complex by anal endosonography, and quantified the anatomic changes of the sphincter. Anal resting and squeezing pressures as well as length of the anal canal were determined by anal manometry. Continence was objectively scored by an observer not involved in treatment of patients and subjectively by patients themselves.

RESULTS

At anal endosonography, the mean thickness of the internal anal sphincter was 1.16 mm (95 percent confidence interval, 0.98-1.33), which is significantly less than in normal volunteers. Tapering of the internal anal sphincter only occurred in six patients (of whom two had a gap in the internal sphincter). In 17 patients endosonography showed a thin internal anal sphincter without essential variation in thickness over the complete circumference. Approximately eight weeks after ileostomy closure following IPAA, maximum resting pressure (MRP) and length of the anal canal appeared to be significantly decreased compared with values before IPAA (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). These differences were less striking (P = 0.05 and 0.04, respectively) when measured six or more months after ileostomy closure. The extent of reduction of the MRP and thickness of the internal anal sphincter were not correlated with grade of continence or with subjectively scored continence.

CONCLUSIONS

IPAA leads to a reduction of thickness of the internal anal sphincter and reduction of the MRP. Tapering or gaps in the internal anal sphincter are probably caused by direct trauma to this sphincter because of mucosectomy, whereas in cases of circular reduction of thickness of the internal anal sphincter without tapering or gaps, direct trauma is an unlikely explanation; this reduction is probably caused by denervation. IPAA compromises continence to a variable degree in 18 of 23 patients. No correlations were found between the extent of reduction of the MRP and the extent of reduction in internal anal sphincter thickness or between these two parameters and objectively or subjectively scored continence. Difficulties in obtaining reliable information on continence may be a causal factor. A striking discrepancy was noticed among objective, scored disturbances in continence, and overall satisfaction concerning level of continence by patients themselves.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth. An extended evaluation

PURPOSE

Women undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are frequently within reproductive years and eager to bear children. Management issues have been raised regarding the effects of pregnancy and delivery on the pouch, particularly with respect to obstetric care. Our experience is updated to search for delayed sequelae of pregnancy and delivery and to establish whether other factors have an adverse effect on pouch function. These results are also compared with the outcome of pregnancy and delivery in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch.

METHODS

Records of 43 women who had a successful pregnancy and delivery following IPAA were reviewed, including 8 women who had more than 1 pregnancy.

RESULTS

Pregnancy was generally well tolerated, with complications being managed nonoperatively. Stool frequency (P < 0.01), incontinence (P < 0.01), and pad usage (P < 0.05; sign rank test) were significantly increased during pregnancy, but prepregnancy function was restored following delivery. Vaginal delivery, multiple births, length of labor, and birth weight had no adverse permanent effect on subsequent pouch function. Longer follow-up after vaginal delivery (mean, 2.4 years) demonstrated no compromise of pouch function.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of pouch-related complications in patients with IPAA compares favorably with incidence in patients with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Operative rate for complications was 0 percent in IPAA patients compared with 9 percent in patients with ileostomy and 19 percent in patients with Kock pouch. The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with IPAA than in those with ileostomy or Kock pouch, and this may be caused by uncertainty about how to manage delivery in patients with IPAA. Pregnancy and childbirth are well tolerated in women with IPAA, with a lower complication rate and a higher cesarean section rate than women with ileostomy or Kock pouch. Type of delivery should be influenced by obstetric considerations, with vaginal delivery avoided in patients with a noncompliant, rigid perineum.

Epidural analgesia shortens postoperative ileus after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis

PURPOSE

A retrospective study was conducted to determine whether epidural analgesia would speed recovery from postoperative ileus in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis.

METHODS

Among 85 patients who underwent proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis at the Mayo Medical Center between January 1, 1991 and October 31, 1992, 44 were treated for postoperative pain with continuous infusion of epidural fentanyl citrate supplemented by intravenous morphine on request, while 41 controls were given only systemic morphine sulfate as needed.

RESULTS

The patients in the two groups were matched and similar with regard to preoperative and operative risk factors and postoperative morbidity. No operative mortality occurred. Epidural fentanyl analgesia resulted in less need for nasogastric suction and intravenous fluids, more rapid discharge of fecal content, more rapid return to oral intake, and shorter hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Epidural analgesia with fentanyl citrate shortened postoperative ileus after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis.

Update on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: current controversies and problems

: The surgical management of ulcerative colitis has been revolutionized in recent years by the development of the ileal pouch-anal procedure. Although it is now the operation of choice for most patients, there remain several controversies. A variety of designs of ileal pouch are available each with advantages and disadvantages. The technique used to anastomose the pouch to the anal canal is also open to debate with some surgeons favoring distal mucosectomy with eradication of all disease and others choosing to perform a stapled anastomosis to achieve better functional results. The main concern for gastroenterologists, however, is the risk of development of pouchitis. The etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition will also be discussed in this review as well as the more classical options for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the value of preoperative anal manometry in predicting post-operative continence.

METHODS

Anal manometry was performed in 73 consecutive patients before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (m1), before loop ileostomy closure (m2), and at a follow-up of one (m3) and two (m4) years. Mean and maximum resting and squeezing pressures were documented at each occasion. One year after surgery, pressures were correlated (r) with an incontinence score.

RESULTS

A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean resting pressures was observed after IPAA (m1 = 66 mmHg; m2 = 42.8 mmHg), followed by a significant (P < 0.05) improvement of mean resting pressure after loop ileostomy closure (m3 = 53.8 mmHg; m4 = 54.7 mmHg). Mean squeezing pressures did not change (P > 0.05) at any time during the study (m1 = 114 mmHg; m2 = 102.9 mmHg; m3 = 103.4 mmHg; m4 = 95.8 mmHg). There was no correlation between preoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative (mI) incontinence score.

CONCLUSION

Anal manometry showed a characteristic trend in internal anal sphincter injury after IPAA followed by recovery after ileostomy closure. However, it failed to prove helpful in the prediction of clinical outcome. Thus, although this study supports the continued use of manometry in a research setting, it challenges the value of routine manometry in a clinical context.

The ileal pouch operation for ulcerative colitis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cures chronic ulcerative colitis with an acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The great majority of patients achieve satisfactory continence with an excellent quality of life. However, continence is not perfect, and fecal soilage is a troublesome problem for a small number of patients. Moreover, as many as one third of patients develop pouchitis, for which an effective means of long-term prevention or treatment has yet to be developed. Finally, controversial issues such as optimal pouch design or technique of anastomosis will be resolved only when long-term follow-up of randomized trials has been completed.

Retained mucosa after double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis

A study was undertaken to assess the incidence of inflammation and dysplasia in retained mucosa after double-stapled ileoanal reservoir (IAR) for mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC). Between September 1988 and February 1992, 56 patients with MUC underwent an IAR. Forty-five patients had a double-stapled IAR (DS-IAR), seven patients had a transanal pursestring stapled IAR (PS-IAR), and four patients had a PS-IAR with mucosectomy. Distal donuts obtained from the stapled IAR were submitted for pathologic review in 55 patients. Nine patients had only small bowel, connective tissue, and/or muscle noted on review. Mucosa was qualified as squamous epithelium (SE), transitional epithelium (TE), or columnar epithelium (CE). All samples were examined for evidence of inflammation and dysplasia. Four patients had SE only, one patient had TE, and 18 had CE. In addition, three patients had SE and CE, seven patients had SE and TE, two patients had CE and TE, and nine patients had all three types. The distance from the dentate line to the anastomosis ranged from 0 to 2.5 cm (mean, 1 cm). In 19 patients (35 percent), the distal donut revealed MUC. Of these 19 patients, six had persistent MUC (43 percent) at the time of subsequent biopsy. An additional four patients had MUC evident on follow-up biopsy but not on distal donuts; two of these four patients had no mucosa in their distal donuts. Only one of the patients with evidence of MUC on donuts and/or biopsy experienced any symptoms referable to active MUC (1.8 percent). None of the specimens examined had any evidence of dysplasia. In 31 patients, no MUC was present in the initial donuts or follow-up biopsies. Although the double-stapled technique appears safe, periodic monitoring is suggested.